j 1
j 1
j 1
net/publication/228333036
CITATIONS READS
134 8,101
3 authors:
Vahid Khatibikamal
University of Tehran
5 PUBLICATIONS 535 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Vahid Khatibikamal on 14 October 2017.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study describes an electrocoagulation process for treating laundry waste-water using aluminum
plates. The effect of various parameters such pH, voltage, hydraulic retention time (HRT), and number of aluminum plates
between the anode and cathode on efficiency of treatment are investigated.
RESULTS: Experimental results showed that by increasing HRT, treatment efficiency increases but beyond 45 min changes are
negligible. Among the results for chemical oxygen demand (COD), phosphorus, detergent, colour and turbidity, the lowest
decrease was found for phosphorus. The larger the HRT, the greater the electrical current needed to achieve constant voltage
and temperature in the system. The pH of the influent is a very significant variable which affects the treatment of laundry
waste-water considerably, the optimal range being 6.0–8.0. In addition, it was found that the pH increases from 8.3 to more
than 10 over the first hour of treatment after which the pH remains relatively constant. Finally, kinetic analysis indicates that
the adsorption system obeys a second-order kinetic model.
CONCLUSION: The aluminum hydroxide generated in the cell decreases the concentration of pollutants in laundry waste-water
to a permissible level. It is concluded that, compared with other treatment processes, electrocoagulation is more effective in
treating laundry waste-water under appropriate conditions.
c 2011 Society of Chemical Industry
Keywords: electrocoagulation; laundry waste-water; aluminum plates; hydraulic retention time; adsorption kinetics
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
c 2011 Society of Chemical Industry J Chem Technol Biotechnol (2011)
Treatment of laundry waste-water by electrocoagulation www.soci.org
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
c 2011 Society of Chemical Industry J Chem Technol Biotechnol (2011)
Treatment of laundry waste-water by electrocoagulation www.soci.org
Table 2. Removal efficiencies of COD, phosphorus, detergent, colour and turbidity as a function of voltage (two extra plates; distance between
plates, 1.5 cm)
Phosphorus removal Detergent removal
COD removal (%) (%) (%) Colour removal (%) Turbidity removal (%)
Time (min) 10 V 20 V 30 V 10 V 20 V 30 V 10 V 20 V 30 V 10 V 20 V 30 V 10 V 20 V 30 V
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 41.4 47.1 79.7 39.1 43.5 53.6 34.3 47.1 59.8 33.1 49.4 69.1 26.7 47.3 88.4
30 52.7 67.2 81.6 55.1 54.7 66.3 44.7 67.2 75.8 42.4 56.6 73 45.7 63.4 91.4
45 56.1 73.2 88.6 69.2 73.6 83.3 51.2 73.2 89.6 48.1 71.2 85.2 51.4 69.1 92.8
60 61.4 79.5 89.3 79 84.1 88.4 55.9 79.5 93.3 55.4 78.9 88 57.2 70.8 94.4
75 66 82.1 89.8 76.8 87.3 90.6 60.7 82.1 95 61.4 80.1 93.1 62.1 74.1 96.7
90 67.3 82.7 89.9 81.2 88 90.9 62 82.7 95.5 65.3 81 94 65.4 75 97
operational parameter, affecting not only the system’s response electrocoagulation, two distinct processes take place: generation
time, but also strongly influencing the dominant mode of pollutant of flocs (electro-dissolution) and adsorption of pollutant on the
separation. Second, these results indicate that running the reactor generated flocs (physical adsorption). The removal of pollutant by
at the highest allowable current density may not be the most adsorption onto flocs is very similar to conventional adsorption
efficient mode of operation. For any specific application, the except for the generation of flocs. The electrode consumption and
optimal current density will invariably involve a trade-off between concentration of generated flocs can be estimated according to
operating costs and efficient use of the introduced coagulant. Faraday’s Law. Since the amount of coagulant can be determined
Moreover, changes in electrical current with fixed voltage were for a given time, the pollutant removal can be modeled by
evaluated and with voltages of 5, 10, 20 and 30 V, the current adsorption phenomenon. Experimental isotherms provide a useful
would be 0.15, 0.49, 0.81 and 1.32 A, respectively. tool to describe the adsorption capacity of a specific adsorbent and
moreover, play a vital role for the analysis and design of adsorption
systems and for modeling and simulation of adsorption processes.
Effect of distance between anode, cathode and extra plates
Many theoretical models have been developed to describe the
The effect of distance between anode, cathode and extra plates experimental data corresponding to adsorption isotherms, but
is presented in Table 3. The results show that, with all other one of these, the Lagergren model, has been widely used to
parameters constant, removal efficiencies of all pollutants increase describe the behaviour of adsorbent–adsorbate. So, in this study
when the distance between the plates is decreased. The main the adsorption kinetic data for COD, phosphorus and detergent
reason for this is that resistance between plates at constant are analyzed using the Lagergren rate equation. The first-order
voltage is decreased so the current increases thus increasing the Lagergren model is:35
concentration of coagulants and bubbles.
dq
= k1 (qe − q) (11)
Effect of extra plates between cathode and anode on dt
performance of electrocoagulation process where qe and q are the adsorption capacities at equilibrium and
The variation of COD, phosphorus, detergent, colour and turbidity at time t (min), respectively; k1 (min−1 ) is the rate constant of
with electrolysis time and the effect of increasing the number first-order adsorption. The integrated form of the above equation
of plates between electrode plates is shown in Fig. 4. Increasing is:
the number of plates increases the removal efficiencies of the k1 t
log(qe − q) = log(qe ) − (12)
pollutants. When two and four extra plates are located between 2.303
anode and cathode, the performance of the electrocoagulation The values of qe and k1 were calculated from the slope of the
process is enhanced because the amount of coagulants rises plots of log (qe − q) versus time (t). A straight line was obtained
and so the removal efficiencies increase. It is clear that this suggesting the applicability of this kinetic model. However, it was
increase in efficiency in a bipolar reactor is better than those found found that the calculated qe values were not compatible with the
with a monopolar reactor, and is connected to concentration of experimental values (data not shown), so the adsorption does not
coagulants produced in both cells. Increasing the number of plates obey first-order kinetics adsorption.36
in a bipolar reactor has a negative influence on removal efficiency The linearized second-order kinetic model is expressed as:
because the extra plates increase the resistance of the system
and consequently the current and concentration of coagulants dq
= k2 (qe − q)2 (13)
decrease. Thus, in each investigation, determination of optimum dt
number of extra plates is essential.
where k2 is the rate constant for second-order adsorption. The
integrated form of Equation (13) is
Adsorption kinetics
Contrary to conventional batch adsorption processes in which the 1 1
= + k2 t (14)
adsorption capacity and pollution concentration reach a maximum qe − q qe
simultaneously, in an electrocoagulation process the amount of t 1 t
= + (15)
insoluble Al(OH)3 particles starts from zero. As stated earlier, in q k2 q2e qe
Table 3. Effect of distance between anode, cathode and extra plates on performance of electrocoagulation (two extra plates; voltage, 30 V)
Phosphorus removal Detergent removal Turbidity removal
COD removal (%) (%) (%) Colour removal (%) (%)
Time
(min) 1.5 cm 3 cm 1.5 cm 3 cm 1.5 cm 3 cm 1.5 cm 3 cm 1.5 cm 3 cm
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 79.7 61.3 53.6 50.4 59.8 38.3 69.1 46.8 88.4 84.8
30 81.6 79.6 66.3 64.3 75.8 55.9 73 57.1 91.4 90.3
45 88.6 85.6 83.3 79.3 89.6 67.6 85.2 72.8 92.8 91.3
60 89.3 87.3 88.4 83.3 93.3 71.5 88 78.6 94.4 92.7
75 89.8 87.6 90.6 89.5 95 72.0 93.1 78.9 96.7 95.0
90 89.9 87.6 90.9 89.2 95.5 72.3 94 79.2 97 95.5
Figure 4. Effect of varying number of extra plates on COD (a), phosphorus (b), detergent (c), colour (d), and turbidity (e) removal (voltage, 30 V; distance
between plates, 15 mm).
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
c 2011 Society of Chemical Industry J Chem Technol Biotechnol (2011)
Treatment of laundry waste-water by electrocoagulation www.soci.org
Figure 5. Second-order kinetic model of COD (a), phosphorus (b), detergent (c) removal with electrolysis time (voltage, 30 V; distance between
plates, 15 mm).
Table 4. Comparison between calculated qe and K2 for COD, phosphorus and detergent in second-order adsorption isotherm (voltage, 30 V;
distance between plates, 15 mm)
The plots of t/q versus time (t) (Fig. 5) are straight lines and the The experimental results show that COD, phosphorus, detergent,
values of qe and k2 were calculated from the slope and intercept colour, and turbidity removal efficiencies were enhanced by in-
of these plots. Correlation coefficients for the second-order kinetic creasing voltage, HRT, and the addition of extra aluminum plates
model obtained in bipolar reactor studies were >0.96. Table 4 between the anode and cathode. After treatment, the removal
shows the computed results obtained and these indicate that the percentages of COD, phosphorus, detergent, colour, and turbidity
adsorption system follows a second-order kinetic model. Also, it is were 93.2%, 96.7%, 93.5%, 90.1% and 95.9%, respectively, from
obvious that the kinetic of electrocoagulation is fast, so coagulant initial concentrations of 4155 mg L−1 , 27.6 mg L−1 , 463 mg L−1 ,
generation and the adsorption of pollutants are started rapidly. 1430 mg L−1 , and 245 mg L−1 , respectively. The adsorption ki-
netic data analyzed using the Lagergren rate equation showed
that the adsorption follows second-order kinetics.
CONCLUSION
In this study the performance of a parallel-plate electrocoagulation
process with aluminum electrodes for the treatment of laundry
REFERENCES
waste-water were investigated. The effect of variation of pH, volt- 1 Wei F, Bing S, Zheng Z, Bio Z, Shu L and Chun T, Treatment of tannery
age, hydraulic retention time, distance and number of aluminum wastewater by electrocoagulation. J Environ Sci 19:1409–1415
plates between the anode and cathode were studied in detail. (2007).
2 Ge J, Qu J, Lei P and Liu H, New bipolar electrocoagula- wastewater by electrocoagulation using aluminum and iron plate
tion–electroflotation process for the treatment of laundry wastew- electrodes. Sep Purif Technol 52:218–223 (2006).
ater. J Sep Purif Technol 36:33–39 (2004). 20 Irdemez S, Yildiz Y and Tosunoglu V, Optimization of phosphate
3 Wang C, Decolorization of congo red with three-dimensional flow-by removal from wastewater by electrocoagulation with aluminum
packed bed electrodes. J Environ Sci Health A38:399–413 (2003). plate electrodes. Sep Purif Technol 52:394–401 (2006).
4 Brillas E, Calpe J and Casado J, Mineralization of 2,4-D by advanced 21 Jewel A, Gomesa G, Praveen D, Kesmeza M, Weira M and Morenoa H,
electrochemical oxidation processes. Water Res 34:2253–2262 et al, Arsenic removal by electrocoagulation using combined Al–Fe
(2000). electrode system and characterization of products. J Hazard Mater
5 Lissen G, Pieters J, Verhaege M, Pinoy L and Verstraete W, 139:220–231 (2007).
Electrochemical degradation of surfactants by intermediates of 22 Merzouka B, Gourichb B, Sekkic A, Madanid K and Chibane M, Re-
water discharge at carbon-based electrodes. Electrochem Acta moval of COD from laundry wastewater by electrocoagula-
48:1655–1663 (2003). tion/electroflotation. J Hazard Mater 164:81–86 (2009).
6 Holt P, Barton G, Wark M and Mitchell C, A quantitative comparison 23 Wanga C, Choub W and Kuoa Y, Removal of COD from laundry
between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation. Colloids Surf wastewater by electrocoagulation/electroflotation. J Hazard Mater
A22:223–248 (2002). 164:81–86 (2009).
7 Leu H, Lin S and Lin T, Enhanced electrochemical oxidation of anionic 24 MY M, JR P and DL C, Electrocoagulation (EC) – science and
surfactants. J Environ Sci Health A33:681–699 (1998). applications. J Hazard Mater 84:29–41 (2001).
8 Balmer L and Foulds A, Separation oil from oil-in water emulsions by 25 Chen G, Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Sep
electroflocculation/electroflotation. Filtr Sep 23:366–369 (1986). Purif Technol 38:11–41 (2004).
9 Hu C, Lo S and Kuan W, Effects of co-existing anions on fluoride 26 APHA, Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater,
removal in electrocoagulation (EC) process using aluminum 17th edn. Washington DC (1992).
electrodes. Water Res 37:4513–4523 (2003). 27 Holt P, Barton G, Wark M and Cynthia A, A quantitative comparison
10 Kumar P, Chaudhari S, Khilar K and Mahajan S, Removal of arsenic from between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation. J Colloid Surfaces
water by electrocoagulation. Chemosphere 55:1245–1252 (2004). A 211:233–248 (2002).
11 Do J and Chen M, Decolourization of dye-containing solutions by 28 Daneshvar N, Oladegaragoze A and Djafarzadeh N, Decolorization of
electrocoagulation. J Appl Electrochem 24:785–790 (1994). basic dye solutions by electrocoagulation: an investigation of the
12 Kim T, Park C, Shin E and Kim S, Decolorization of disperse and reactive effect of operational parameters. J Hazard Mater 129:116–122
dyes by continuous electrocoagulation process. Desalination (2006).
150:165–175 (2002). 29 Chen X, Chen G and Yue P, Anodic oxidation of dyes at novel Ti/B-
13 Kobya M, Can O and Bayramoglu M, Treatment of textile wastewaters diamond electrodes. J Chem Eng Sci 58:995 (2003).
by electrocoagulation using iron and aluminum electrodes. J Hazard 30 Mouedhena G, Fekia M, Weryb M and Ayedi H, Behavior of aluminum
Mater B100:163–178 (2003). electrodes in electrocoagulation process. J Hazard Mater
14 Daneshvar N, Ashassi-Sorkhabi H and Tizpar A, Decolorization of 150:124–135 (2008).
orange II by electrocoagulation method. Sep Purif Technol 31 Pletcher D and Walsh F, Industrial Electrochemistry, 2nd edn, Chapman
31:153–162 (2003). and Hall, London (1990).
15 Daneshvar N, Ashassi-Sorkhabi H and Kasiri M, Decolorization of dye 32 Dobolyi E, Experiments aimed at the removal of phosphate by
solution containing Acid Red 14 by electrocoagulation with electrochemical methods. Water Res 12:1113–1116 (1978).
a comparative investigation of different electrode connections. 33 Murugananthan M, Raju G and Prabhakar S, Separation of pollutants
J Hazard Mater B112:55–62 (2004). from tannery effluents by electro flotation. J Sep Purif Technol
16 Zaroual Z, Azzi M, Saib N and Chainet E, Contribution to the study of 40:69–75 (2004).
electrocoagulation mechanism in basic textile effluent. J Hazard 34 Jiantuan G, Jiuhui Q, Pengju L and Huijuan L, New bipolar
Mater B131:73–78 (2006). electrocoagulation–electroflotation process for the treatment of
17 Larue O, Vorobiev E and Durand C, Electrocoagulation and laundry wastewater. Sep Purif Technol 36:33–39 (2004).
coagulation by iron of latex particles in aqueous suspensions. 35 Celekli A, Yavuzatmaca M and Bozkurt H, Kinetic and equilibrium
Sep Purif Technol 31:177–192 (2003). studies on the adsorption of reactive red 120 from aqueous solution
18 Gao P, Chen X, Shen F and Chen G, Removal of chromium (VI) on Spirogyra majuscule. Chem Eng J 152:139–145 (2009).
from wastewater by combined electrocoagulation–electroflotation 36 Subramanyan V, Jothinathan L, Jeganathan J and Ganapathy S,
without a filter. Sep Purif Technol 43:117–123 (2005). Remediation of 367 phosphate contaminated water by
19 Irdemez S, Demircioglu N, Yildiz Y and Bingül Z, The effects of current electrocoagulation with aluminium, aluminium alloy and mild steel
density and phosphate concentration on phosphate removal from anodes. J Hazard Mater 164:1480–1486 (2008).
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
c 2011 Society of Chemical Industry J Chem Technol Biotechnol (2011)
View publication stats