How to succeed in EPSO verbal reasoning tests, volume 2
How to succeed in EPSO verbal reasoning tests, volume 2
How to succeed in EPSO verbal reasoning tests, volume 2
1. Introduction
2. About the author
3. Summary of methods and strategies
3.1. Overview on EPSO verbal tests
3.2. Methods to solve verbal reasoning questions
3.3. Strategies to improve your performance
4. Sample questions
5. Analysing and solving questions
Exercise 1
Exercise 2
Exercise 3
Exercise 4
Exercise 5
Exercise 6
Exercise 7
Exercise 8
Exercise 9
Exercise 10
Exercise 11
Exercise 12
Exercise 13
Exercise 14
Exercise 15
Exercise 16
Exercise 1 7
Exercise 18
Exercise 19
Exercise 20
6. Conclusions and recommendations
Appreciation to the reader
1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this book is to help prepare verbal reasoning tests for
competitions or selection procedures, especially those ones organised by the
European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), like Administrators (AD),
Assistants (AST), and contract agents (CAST), to get a job in the EU
institutions.
The book is a follow-up to our first guide on this subject, but can be used
independently. However, we recommend the acquisition of the first book in
order to revise and practise different methods to solve these exercises, some
considerations on the language that you should choose for this test, and all
details about EPSO verbal reasoning tests, which we will not repeat here,
with the purpose of offering only fresh content to our readers. We will only
present a brief reminder about these EPSO tests, the methods that we
analysed in the previous book, and a review of our strategies to improve your
performance.
For this reason, we will dedicate the core part of this book to show and study
in detail a new series of sample exercises, carefully selected and very close to
the ones that we usually find in the actual exams.
Again, after my long experience in teaching and coaching, I consider that,
instead of a large amount of exercises with a quite short explanation of each
solution, as you can find in other handbooks and platforms (which are good
to practise when you feel more confident), it is much more effective, in order
to reach a full understanding for many candidates with difficulties in quick
reading or text analysis, to focus on a smaller number of exercises and
explain each one in depth, guiding you step-by-step along the process –
mental and technical – that will allow you to get to the right answer of every
question .
Our main goal with this second book is to increase your reading and
comprehension speed, together with your ability to detect keywords in the
text passages and answer options. Besides, we will offer new tips and tools,
as well as potential ‘shortcuts’, to facilitate your task of solving the exercises
as fast as possible. All this will raise your marks, making you achieve top
scores in verbal reasoning tests.
In the last part of the book, I will summarise my conclusions and
recommendations about these tests, with the aim of easing your study and
review.
Finally, I encourage you to devote enough time and effort to prepare your
selection procedures. No professional success of your life will be comparable
to the satisfaction and excitement of passing an open competition, and getting
a job at the public administration.
I wish my readers the best of luck.
2. ABOUT THE AUTHOR
- Do not forget to check the standard question : even though the vast
majority of EPSO verbal reasoning tests ask you to select the correct
or true answer, we cannot completely dismiss the possibility of
finding a question about choosing the incorrect or false statement.
Option B: The new full regulatory framework has been postponed until
2025 to allow the public consultation process.
The seventh sentence of the text provides the information that we need here:
The updates , proposed following public consultation , were described as an
interim measure to support the early adoption of the technology and a full
regulatory framework is planned to be implemented by 2025 .
We can clearly separate two assertions:
- The updates were proposed following public consultation.
- A full regulatory framework is planned to be implemented by 2025.
So the public consultation process was already carried out to propose the
updates, and it is not the reason of the postponement of the adoption of the
new framework. We must discard this answer option.
Option A: Using mobile phones while driving is currently legal , provided
that hands-free devices are utilised.
By searching for ‘mobile phones’ in the text, we soon check that using these
devices while driving is illegal, and will remain so:
However, using mobile phones while driving will remain illegal.
This alternative has to be rejected too.
Exercise 12
The fact that diet can impact an individual’s health is well acknowledged
by healthcare providers worldwide. People who have access to adequate
nutrition are more likely to have strong immune systems, safer
pregnancy and childbirth, lower risk of diabetes and cardiovascular
disease, and they live longer. The reasons for this are myriad, complex,
and not yet well understood. Some research has shown that a diet rich in
added sugars, saturated and trans fats and excess sodium may induce
chronic inflammation — an underlying risk factor in the development of
heart disease, type 2 diabetes, poor gut health, and other chronic
diseases. Likewise, the American Heart Association recently made diet
and lifestyle recommendations that included a diet rich in fruits,
vegetables, whole grains, legumes, low-fat dairy, and plant-based or lean
animal protein to support cardiovascular health. Experts think that this
diet supports good health through its potential to reduce harmful risk
factors of cardiovascular disease, including inflammation, elevated
cholesterol, high blood pressure, and poor sleep. ( Medical News Today )
Which of the following statements is correct?
A) Some research has shown that a diet low in sugars, saturated fats and
sodium protects against heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and poor gut
health.
B) The reasons for the impact of diet on individual’s health are all well
known by healthcare providers worldwide.
C) Experts think that a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes,
low-fat dairy, and plant-based or lean animal protein supports good
health.
D) Some harmful risk factors of cardiovascular disease are sedentary
lifestyle, elevated cholesterol, and high blood pressure.
Solution :
Option D: Some harmful risk factors of cardiovascular disease are
sedentary lifestyle , elevated cholesterol , and high blood pressure .
As we explained in the strategies in chapter 3, some statements are especially
difficult for candidates, because they are correct if we use common and
general knowledge, so one has a natural tendency to agree with them and
mark them as the fine answer. However, even if they are correct and true in
real life, we can only accept them when they are fully proven by the
information from the passage.
This answer option is a good example of this. We need to verify in the text
whether or not this assertion is grounded on the data provided.
We look for references to ‘cardiovascular disease’ and get to the last sentence
of the article:
Experts think that this diet* supports good health through its potential to
reduce harmful risk factors of cardiovascular disease , including inflammation
, elevated cholesterol , high blood pressure , and poor sleep .
*The diet is detailed in the previous sentence: a diet rich in fruits, vegetables,
whole grains, legumes, low-fat dairy, and plant-based or lean animal protein
.
So the risk factors of cardiovascular disease listed in the passage are the
following: inflammation, elevated cholesterol, high blood pressure, and poor
sleep. As you can see, they do not match the ones enumerated in this answer
option, because ‘sedentary lifestyle’ does not appear here.
Still, we should check the rest of the passage, in case that this factor is
mentioned in another phrase.
We can only find a reference to ‘lifestyle recommendations’ by the American
Heart Association that could certainly make us deduce that lifestyle has an
influence on cardiovascular disease, but there is no mention about what type
of lifestyle constitutes a risk factor and we cannot prove that this is, in
particular, a ‘sedentary lifestyle’.
Therefore, we must delete this option.
Option C: Experts think that a diet rich in fruits, vegetables , whole grains,
legumes, low-fat dairy, and plant-based or lean animal protein supports
good health.
Our analysis in depth for the previous answer option already showed that this
is precisely the diet recommended to support a good cardiovascular health,
more specifically this paragraph:
Likewise, the American Heart Association recently made diet and lifestyle
recommendations that included a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains,
legumes, low-fat dairy, and plant-based or lean animal protein to support
cardiovascular health.
We can conclude that this is the right alternative.
Option B: The reasons for the impact of diet on individual’s health are all
well known by healthcare providers worldwide.
‘Reasons’, ‘impact’, and ‘diet’ are good keywords here to find the relevant
information:
The fact that diet can impact an individual’s health is well acknowledged by
healthcare providers worldwide. People who have access to adequate
nutrition are more likely to have strong immune systems, safer pregnancy
and childbirth, lower risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and they
live longer. The reasons for this are myriad, complex, and not yet well
understood .
Note that the fact that diet has an impact on health is well known, but the
reasons why this happens are complex and not yet well understood. So this
option is incorrect .
Option A: Some research has shown that a diet low in sugars , saturated fats
and sodium protects against heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and poor gut
health.
This option is visibly wrong: according to the text, ‘[s]ome research has
shown that a diet rich in added sugars , saturated and trans fats and excess
sodium may induce chronic inflammation — an underlying risk factor in
the development of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, poor gut health, and other
chronic diseases’.
The passage does not explain the effects of a diet low in sugars, so we cannot
admit this alternative.
Exercise 13
A paper published last month by researchers in Spain documents the
effects of an online math tutoring program provided for about 175
socioeconomically disadvantaged students 12 to 15 years old in Madrid
and Catalonia in the spring of 2021, when schools had reopened after
COVID-19 shutdowns. The tutors were math teachers who’d undergone
15-20 hours of additional training in skills that included tutoring
techniques. Each tutor worked with groups of two students for eight
weeks. After school, when students were at home, they went online to
connect with their tutors for three 50-minute sessions per week. They
worked on math skills and concepts, but the tutors also helped students
build good work routines and supported their emotional well-being. The
researchers found that compared to a control group, students in the
tutoring program had higher standardized test scores and grades, and
were less likely to repeat a grade. They also were more likely to report
putting increased effort into their schoolwork. Researchers estimated
that the rise in the students’ grades was equivalent to the bump that six
additional months of learning would produce. ( Education Week )
Which of the following statements is correct?
A) The tutoring program provided for disadvantaged students included math
skills, study routines, and support to physical and mental well-being.
B) Each student under this programme had 1200 minutes of online tutoring
in total.
C) In comparison with the rest of the students of their schools, students in
the tutoring program were less likely to repeat a grade and more likely to
put increased effort into their tasks.
D) The progress in the students’ grades was sufficient to compensate six
months of the lost time in learning.
Solution :
Option D: The progress in the students’ grades was sufficient to
compensate six months of the lost time in learning.
Our text scanning shows (via ‘six months’) that the relevant data is located in
the last sentence of the article:
Researchers estimated that the rise in the students’ grades was equivalent to the
bump that six additional months of learning would produce.
We can observe that this is not comparable to the statement. The effect of six
additional months of learning (that is, when the students have already learned
for some time) does not have to necessarily equal the effect of six months of
lost time (when maybe they had no initial knowledge). Starting situations are
different, so the effect of six months of training could differ too.
We cannot accept this option.
Option C: In comparison with the rest of the students of their schools,
students in the tutoring program were less likely to repeat a grade and
more likely to put increased effort into their tasks.
The relevant information is again in the final part of the passage, just before
the last sentence that we already analysed:
The researchers found that compared to a control group , students in the
tutoring program had higher standardized test scores and grades, and were
less likely to repeat a grade. They also were more likely to report putting
increased effort into their schoolwork.
As you can see, the main difference between both assertions is at their
beginning: a ‘control group’ is not the same as ‘the rest of the students of
their schools’.
Note that a control group is usually a group with a similar number of
individuals but not subjected to the conditions of the research (a tutoring
programme in this case), so it allows researchers to better study effects and
consequences on the group under these conditions. For operational reasons, it
would rarely be composed of the entire remaining population.
Anyway, this would be ‘outside knowledge’ (basic statistics) that we do not
need – and must not use – to solve the question. The mere fact that both
concepts (the control group and the rest of the students) do not have to
necessarily be equal is reason enough to reject this option.
Option B: Each student under this programme had 1200 minutes of online
tutoring in total.
In order to check this option, we need to calculate how much online tutoring
time each student had.
We can extract from the passage numerical data that could be helpful for this
purpose:
So, the total number of students is irrelevant too, as we have the length of the
sessions (50 minutes), the number of sessions per week (3), and the total
number of weeks (8) of the tutoring programme. We only need to multiply
these figures to obtain the total time of online tutoring:
50 minutes/session * 3 sessions/week * 8 weeks = 1 200 minutes
We recommend writing down the specific item to which each figure is
referred (minutes, hours per week, lessons, students per room…) in your
calculations, because they can be helpful to ch eck that your operations were
correct, just by using the simplification of numerators and denominators that
we know. For example, in this case:
50 minutes/session * 3 sessions /week * 8 weeks = 1 200 minutes
We can validate this option and mark it as true.
Option A: The tutoring program provided for disadvantaged students
included math skills, study routines , and support to physical and mental
well-being .
This is the paragraph of the text that contains the pertinent information:
They worked on math skills and concepts, but the tutors also helped students
build good work routines and supported their emotional well-being .
We can quickly see that ‘physical well-being’ was not included in the
tutoring programme, so we must eliminate this option.
Exercise 14
A ridge etched into the ice sheet of Greenland provides an unexpected
hint that plentiful pockets of water may be trapped just underneath the
surface of Jupiter's ice-covered moon Europa, one of the solar system's
likeliest candidates to host microbial life. The surface of Europa, one of
Jupiter's four main moons, is covered with a 15-mile-thick (20
kilometers) ice crust, underneath which scientists believe an ocean
swashes. The ice crust is latticed with so-called double ridges, pairs of
long parallel raised lines with a vale in between, as much as hundreds of
miles or kilometers long. But there might be scientific promises much
closer to the frozen moon's surface, according to a new study that found
similarities between processes shaping the surface of the distant moon
and Earth's own icy Greenland. A recent analysis of satellite images
revealed that a strikingly similar ridge formed in the ice sheet covering
Greenland about 10 years ago. "This is the first time that we've seen a
double ridge like this on Earth," Riley Culberg, a lead author of the new
study, told Space.com. ( Space.com )
Which of the following statements is incorrect?
A) Europa, one of Jupiter’s moons, is covered with an ice crust that could
contain an ocean underneath.
B) A double ridge like this had never been seen on Earth before the finding
in the ice sheet of Greenland.
C) If plentiful pockets of water were trapped underneath its surface, as
scientists believe, Europa is likely to host microbial life.
D) Double ridges in the ice crust with a vale in between are a good sign of
the potential existence of water below.
Solution :
We should pay special attention to this question because, when we have a
look at the standard question to verify if we are looking for the correct or
incorrect answer, we observe that this is one of the very rare cases in which
you must select the incorrect statement.
As we explained in our previous book on verbal reasoning, the vast majority
of EPSO tests ask about the true or correct answer, but we want to cover the
opposite case at least once in this book too, in order to always keep the
candidate watchful on this, and insisting in our recommendation of a quick
check of the standard question.
Let us start our study of the options from A to D, taking into account that, in
this exercise, we will have to reject three ‘correct’ answer options.
Option A: Europa , one of Jupiter’s moons, is covered with an ice crust that
could contain an ocean underneath .
It is easy to find the relevant sentence, through keywords such as ‘ice crust’
or ‘ocean’ (note that the noun ‘Europa’ is expected to be repeated more times
in an article on this moon, although it eventually appears only twice):
The surface of Europa , one of Jupiter's four main moons, is covered with a 15-
mile-thick (20 kilometers) ice crust , underneath which scientists believe an
ocean swashes.
Note that the expression ‘could contain’ (in the statement) fits the assertion of
the text: ‘scientist believe’.
So this option is right; it is not our target.
Option B: A double ridge like this had never been seen on Earth before the
finding in the ice sheet of Greenland .
We need to scan the full passage to get to the essential data here :
A recent analysis of satellite images revealed that a strikingly similar ridge
formed in the ice sheet covering Greenland about 10 years ago. "This is the
first time that we've seen a double ridge like this on Earth ," […].
Both pieces of information are equivalent. This implies that this option is
correct too.
Option C: If plentiful pockets of water were trapped underneath its
surface , as scientists believe, Europa is likely to host microbial life .
The first lines of the article give us the key to evaluate this alternative:
A ridge etched into the ice sheet of Greenland provides an unexpected hint
that plentiful pockets of water may be trapped just underneath the surface of
Jupiter's ice-covered moon Europa , one of the solar system's likeliest
candidates to host microbial life .
This is a good moment to remind our readers one of our tips and
recommendations: do not presume a cause-and-effect relationship just
because two facts are presented together or in chronological order. This is
what happens here.
This option presents a possibility (that plentiful pockets of water were
trapped underneath its surface ) as a condition (the word ‘if’ is key) to make
Europa likely to host microbial life, while the text passage just displayed this
information (Europa, one of the solar system's likeliest candidates to host
microbial life ) in a way unrelated to that possibility: there are no expressions
of causality such as ‘because’, ‘due to’, etc.
For this reason, we must select option C as the incorrect statement and our
answer to this question.
Option D: Double ridges in the ice crust with a vale in between are a good
sign of the potential existence of water below .
We should first focus on this sentence in the middle of the passage :
The ice crust is latticed with so-called double ridges , pairs of long parallel
raised lines with a vale in between , as much as hundreds of miles or
kilometers long.
Then, combining this with the information that we already read for the
previous options (‘A ridge etched into the ice sheet of Greenland provides an
unexpected hint that plentiful pockets of water may be trapped […]’) and
other sentences (‘according to a new study that found similarities between
processes shaping the surface of the distant moon and Earth's own icy
Greenland’), as well as the general idea of the article that we should extract
by our own verbal reasoning, we can conclude that the statement in option D
is also true.
Exercise 15
On Sunday, 18-year-old Spaniard Carlos Alcaraz won the Miami Open,
beating Casper Ruud in the final to become the youngest winner of the
tournament in its 37-year history. After winning his first Masters 1000
title, Alcaraz was congratulated by his country's most famous tennis
player — 21-time grand slam winner Nadal, who earned his "King of
Clay" moniker due to his dominance on Roland Garros' red stuff.
"Many congratulations Carlitos for your historic triumph in Miami,"
Nadal wrote on Twitter. "The first of many to come, for sure." Alcaraz
was also lauded by Spain's King Felipe VI. "I was more nervous for that
call than the match," a smiling Alcaraz said after winning the Miami
Open. "It's pretty amazing that the Spanish king congratulates you on
the hard work that you put every day and your win. It's something that
you never thought you were going to receive, a Spanish king call. It's
amazing." ( CNN/ Sports )
Which of the following statements is correct?
A) Nadal congratulated Alcaraz for his Miami Open title, which had also
been won previously by Nadal, but being older than Alcaraz.
B) Carlos Alcaraz, a young tennis player from Murcia, Spain, beated the
Norwegian Casper Ruud to become the youngest winner of the Miami
Open tournament in its history.
C) Despite his short tennis career, Alcaraz has already won some Masters
1000 titles, but never the Miami Open.
D) The young winner, Carlitos, never expected to receive one day a call
from the Spain’s King.
Solution :
The background colour of this sport article is the orange of the clay on the
tennis court. Let us analyse the four answer options.
Option A: Nadal congratulated Alcaraz for his Miami Open title, which
had also been won previously by Nadal , but being older than Alcaraz.
We can use the not common word ‘congratulated’ to find the relevant part of
the passage:
After winning his first Masters 1000 title, Alcaraz was congratulated by his
country's most famous tennis player — 21-time grand slam winner Nadal
, who earned his "King of Clay" moniker due to his dominance on Roland
Garros' red stuff.
To verify the specific title (Miami Open ), we need to analyse the first
sentence too:
On Sunday, 18-year-old Spaniard Carlos Alcaraz won the Miami Open ,
beating Casper Ruud in the final to become the youngest winner of the
tournament in its 37-year history.
This introduction in the article is useful to obtain relevant information for one
or more answer options.
You can observe in most exercises that reading the first lines of the articles is
usually a good strategy. That is why we recommended doing so in our
combined method, as we explained in our first book.
In this case, however, we still need to validate the second part of the
statement (being older than Alcaraz ). The fact that Alcaraz was the youngest
winner of the title ever does not imply that Nadal was one of the previous
winners (regardless his amazing winning record, which is outside
knowledge).
We proceed to scan the full text, looking for some evidence, but we cannot
find anything to support it: no mention to Nadal’s victories, except for
Roland Garros tournament. So we must refuse this option.
Option B: Carlos Alcaraz , a young tennis player from Murcia, Spain ,
beated the Norwegian Casper Ruud to become the youngest winner of the
Miami Open tournament in its history.
Again here, the statement provides additional data that are not proven by the
text. According to the first lines that we have read, we cannot know the
hometown of Alcaraz or the nationality of Ruud. In this case, using external
knowledge, it turns out that both data are correct, so this could be a trap for
candidates who are tennis fans or just familiar with the subject.
Therefore, this is a ‘cannot say’ statement that we must remove from our
possible answers.
Option C: Despite his short tennis career , Alcaraz has already won some
Masters 1000 titles, but never the Miami Open .
According to the information that we already analysed (‘After winning his
first Masters 1000 title, Alcaraz […]’), we know that this player never won a
Masters 1000 title before, so this answer option is false.
Option D: The young winner , Carlitos , never expected to receive one day
a call from the Spain’s King .
The second half of the article shows the relevant data to check this statement:
Alcaraz was also lauded by Spain's King Felipe VI. "I was more nervous for
that call than the match," a smiling Alcaraz said after winning the Miami
Open. "It's pretty amazing that the Spanish king congratulates you on the hard
work that you put every day and your win. It's something that you never
thought you were going to receive , a Spanish king call. It's amazing. "
By the comments of Alcaraz, we can say with certainty that the young player
never expected to receive that call from the Spain’s King.
The nickname ‘Carlitos’ – applied to the player who won in Miami – can be
verified in a previous sentence:
"Many congratulations Carlitos for your historic triumph in Miami,"
Nadal wrote on Twitter.
All this proves that option D is correct.
Exercise 16
Keeping our eyes focused on what we reach for, whether it be an item at
the grocery store or a ground ball on the baseball field, may appear
seamless, but, in fact, is due to a complex neurological process involving
intricate timing and coordination. In a newly published study in the
journal Nature , a team of researchers sheds additional light on the
machinations that ensure we don't look away from where we are
reaching. The work centers on a form of coordinated looking and reach
called "gaze anchoring" — the temporary stoppage of eye movements in
order to coordinate reaches. "Our results show that we anchor our gaze
to the target of the reach movement, thereby looking at that target for
longer periods," explains Bijan Pesaran, a professor at NYU's Center for
Neural Science and one of the paper's authors. "This is what makes our
reaches much more accurate.” The study, conducted with Maureen
Hagan, a neuroscientist at Australia's Monash University, explores the
frequently studied but not well understood process of gaze anchoring. (
Science Daily )
Which of the following statements is correct?
A) The process of gaze anchoring, or the temporary stoppage of eye
movements to coordinates reaches, is more complex than it may seem.
B) Maureen Hagan, one of the study’s authors, is a neuroscientist at
Australia's Monash University.
C) The professor at NYU’s Center for Neural Science has a different
opinion than the neuroscientist at Australia’s Monash University.
D) It is more complex to keep our eyes focused on an item at the grocery
store than on a ground ball on the baseball field.
Solution :
Option A: The process of gaze anchoring , or the temporary stoppage of
eye movements to coordinates reaches , is more complex than it may seem
.
Once more, our strategy of reading the first lines of the article to get an
overview of the topic and even directly answer some questions would save us
valuable time in this exercise. Nevertheless, we can also employ the keyword
‘complex’ for our search of the corresponding paragraph – the first one:
Keeping our eyes focused on what we reach for, whether it be an item at the
grocery store or a ground ball on the baseball field, may appear seamless,
but, in fact, is due to a complex neurological process involving intricate timing
and coordination.
This initial information is more than enough to consider this option as a very
good candidate to be the right one.
In any case, we should have a look to the rest of the passage to confirm this
view and discard potential surprises.
By the middle of the text, it mentions a work centred on a form of
coordinated looking and reach called " gaze anchoring " — the temporary
stoppage of eye movements in order to coordinate reaches .
Then, at the end of the article, it says that the study explores the frequently
studied but not well understood process of gaze anchoring .
With all these pieces of information, we can corroborate that our initial
overview is accurate and this is the correct answer option.
In your exam, you could move on to the next question and save a precious
time. Only if you still had time available after finishing the last question, you
could spend it checking the previously discarded options .
Option B: Maureen Hagan , one of the study’s authors , is a neuroscientist
at Australia's Monash University .
In our analysis of option A, we already read the data that we need to assess
this option, in the last sentence of the article:
The study , conducted with Maureen Hagan , a neuroscientist at Australia's
Monash University , explores […].
Note that the verb ‘to conduct’ can mean ‘to lead’ or ‘to guide’, but also ‘to
organise’ or ‘to present’. In addition, the preposition ‘with’ is essential here,
because ‘conducted with’, in this context, can mean ‘carried out with’ or
‘organised with’, so Maureen Hagan could likely be one of the collaborators
in the research, but not necessarily one of the study’s authors (as it is the case
of Bijan Pesaran, a professor at NYU's Center for Neural Science, mentioned
in a previous sentence with this role). Therefore, we must delete this option.
Option C: The professor at NYU’s Center for Neural Science has a different
opinion than the neuroscientist at Australia’s Monash University.
We have no references or comments on the opinion of Maureen Hagan, the
neuroscientist at Australia’s Monash University, so we do not even need to
read the views of the NYU professor: this is a ‘cannot say’ statement that we
must reject too.
Option D: It is more complex to keep our eyes focused on an item at the
grocery store than on a ground ball on the baseball field .
Contrary to this statement, the first lines of the passage equated both actions
(‘whether it be an item at the grocery store or a ground ball on the baseball
field’), when considering the complex process of keeping our eyes focused.
This answer option cannot be accepted either.
Exercise 17
The language sciences have for a long time assumed that the sound of a
word should tell us nothing about what it means. This is meant to explain
why different languages often use very different sound patterns to
express the same meaning. For example, the perennial woody plant that
we refer to in English as “tree” is “ Baum ” in German, “ arbre” in
French, and “shù” ( 樹 ) in Mandarin Chinese. Of course, languages
contain onomatopoeia such as beep, bang and buzz – but many scholars,
like Steven Pinker, have argued that such sound-meaning relations are
mere exceptions that prove the rule. However, as language scientists
have looked more closely at the world’s more than 7,000 languages, they
have discovered that sound symbolism is no rare exception but arises in
many shapes and forms. For example, if you pick a language at random
that has the concept of “red”, the corresponding word is more likely than
not to have an “r” sound in it — such as “ rød ” in Danish, “ rouge ” in
French, and “ krasnyy ” ( красный ) in Russian. This doesn’t mean that
an “r” sound always means “red”, only that words for red often have “r”
sounds in them the world over. ( The Conversation )
Which of the following statements is correct?
A) An “r” sound in a word for a colour usually means that the colour is
“red”, if you pick a language that has this concept of “red”.
B) It is more likely than not to have an “r” sound in the words for red.
C) Onomatopoeia implies sound-meaning relations, which are mere
exceptions in the world’s more than 7,000 languages.
D) It is easier to learn a language with many onomatopoeic words than with
few.
Solution :
We can see that option D is much shorter than A, so it is reasonable to start
analysing the answer options in reverse order here.
Option D: It is easier to learn a language with many onomatopoeic words
than with few.
Maybe when you did this exercise, you selected the term ‘onomatopoeic’ to
scan the text, and this is a good try indeed – it is a quite uncommon word that
only appears once:
Of course, languages contain onomatopoeia such as beep, bang and buzz –
but many scholars, like Steven Pinker, have argued that such sound-meaning
relations are mere exceptions that prove the rule. However, as language
scientists have looked more closely at the world’s more than 7,000
languages, they have discovered that sound symbolism is no rare exception
but arises in many shapes and forms.
Unfortunately, neither the corresponding sentence nor the subsequent one is
related to the issue that we have to verify.
In this sense, and considering that we are already advanced students in verbal
reasoning (!), our advice to speed up the process of evaluating the answer
options is to refine your selection of keywords for your search as much as
possible: if there is a word that necessarily has to appear in the article to
confirm the validity of the statement, our best strategy is choosing this word
(and its synonyms) to find the relevant data or, in case it does not appear, to
reject the answer option.
Note that, in this case, to validate this option, you need to prove that
something is easier to learn than something else. So the verb ‘to learn’ (or its
synonyms) would have to appear in the passage, and consequently it is a
better keyword to search.
We can see in a quick text scanning that this word or other similar (‘training’,
‘courses’, ‘lessons’) are not mentioned in the article .
Therefore, there is no way to prove the statement in option D with the
information provided, and we must delete it.
Option C: Onomatopoeia implies sound-meaning relations , which are
mere exceptions in the world’s more than 7,000 languages .
The terms ‘onomatopoeia’ or ‘exceptions’ will lead us to the same paragraph
that we presented above:
Of course, languages contain onomatopoeia such as beep, bang and buzz –
but many scholars , like Steven Pinker, have argued that such sound-meaning
relations are mere exceptions that prove the rule. However , as language
scientists have looked more closely at the world’s more than 7,000 languages,
they have discovered that sound symbolism is no rare exception but arises in
many shapes and forms.
As you can see, the first part of the statement (onomatopoeia implies sound-
meaning relations ) matches the content of the article, but the second one
does not: according to language scientists , after studying more than 7,000
languages , they discovered that sound symbolism is no rare exception , but,
on the contrary, it is presented in many forms.
We must abandon option C too.
Option B: It is more likely than not to have an “r” sound in the words for
red .
The last lines of the passage, which can be located through red or “r” sound
as keywords, show us the information required to verify this statement:
For example, if you pick a language at random that has the concept of “red”
the corresponding word is more likely than not to have an “r” sound in it —
such as “ rød” in Danish, “ rouge” in French, and “ krasnyy” ( красный) in
Russian. This doesn’t mean that an “r” sound always means “red”, only that
words for red often have “r” sounds in them the world over .
We can observe that this information (words for red are more likely than not
to have an “r” sound) perfectly matches the assertion in option B, so this is
the right answer.
Option A: An “r” sound in a word for a colour usually means that the colour
is “red”, if you pick a language that has this concept of “red”.
This statement can be soon eliminated by using the same paragraph that we
analysed for the previous option: an “r” sound does not mean that a colour is
“red”. The cause-effect relationship described in the article works in the
opposite way, as we said (words for red often have “r” sounds ).
Exercise 18
Representation in film and television is something that so many people
have been striving for decades now. There’s still work to be done within
the industry to ensure that diverse experiences are being portrayed on
screen, but Hollywood has made strides in recent years. The deaf
community is such a group that has experienced an increase in visibility
over the years, which has been a true joy to witness. Viewers have gotten
to see some incredible movie and TV characters played by deaf actors,
plenty of stellar performances. Looking back at one of these truly
fantastic characters, it’s honestly hard not to think about Sarah Norman
from Randa Haines’ 1986 romance, Children of a Lesser God , and the
person who brought the character to life on screen – Marlee Matlin, then
aged 21. This film was actually the actress’ first movie role, and it earned
her an Oscar for Best Actress, making her the first deaf performer to
even win an Academy Award. ( Cinema Blend )
Which of the following statements is correct?
A) Many people have been striving for decades to play good characters in
film and television, although this is harder for deaf actors.
B) The deaf community has raised its visibility in film over time, which
allowed viewers to enjoy amazing characters played by deaf actresses,
like the Oscar-winner Marlee Matlin.
C) Randa Haines was the character played by Marlee Matlin in the film
Children of a Lesser God .
D) Marlee Matlin was the first deaf performer to win an Academy Award,
and the youngest winner in the Best Actress category.
Solution :
Option D: Marlee Matlin was the first deaf performer to win an Academy
Award , and the youngest winner in the Best Actress category.
Good fans of cinema or this actress’ followers will probably know that this
assertion is completely true. However, when we drafted this statement, we
wanted to draw your attention again about not using outside knowledge to
evaluate the options: you must always stick to the information provided in the
text.
So let us study this option with our usual care.
The word ‘first’ is a necessary term in the passage in order to confirm this
statement. It appears twice in the last sentence:
This film was actually the actress’ first movie role, and it earned her an Oscar
for Best Actress , making her the first deaf performer to even win an Academy
Award .
We also need to check the name of the actress, which is in the previous
sentence, accompanied by her age (this is potentially useful to verify if she
was the youngest winner): Marlee Matlin , then aged 21 .
The initial part of the statement is correct, as Marlee Matlin was the first deaf
performer to win an Academy Award. But, in the rest of the article, there is
no confirmation on the second part: we cannot know, by the information
provided, whether she was the youngest winner in the Best Actress category
or not.
This is a ‘cannot say’ statement, according to the data from the passage, so
we must refuse this option.
We offer our readers an additional tip here. Note that, in several exercises,
when we look for the information associated to option D in the passage, the
relevant sentences are many times located at the final part of the article. In a
similar way, the data corresponding to option A is quite often placed at the
beginning of the text.
This is because many test designers have a natural tendency towards the
progressive creation of the four options by extracting information along the
passage in a structured way, and also with the target of avoiding
concentrating all data required to solve the question in one or two paragraphs
and facilitating too much the candidates’ task.
So, when you decide carrying out your analysis of the options from D to A, it
could be helpful to scan the article in a ‘reverse way’, that is, starting with the
final sentences, in order to speed up your search; while you should better
keep the natural way – starting from the beginning of the passage, when you
perform your analysis from A to D.
Option C: Randa Haines was the character played by Marlee Matlin in
the film Children of a Lesser God .
The name of the actress easily guides us to the lines that we should study:
Looking back at one of these truly fantastic characters , it’s honestly hard not
to think about Sarah Norman from Randa Haines’ 1986 romance, Children
of a Lesser God , and the person who brought the character to life on screen
Marlee Matlin , then aged 21.
So it is clear that Sarah Norman was the character played by Marlee Matlin,
and not Ronda Haines (Ms Haines was the director of the film). This answer
option is wrong.
Option B: The deaf community has raised its visibility in film over time,
which allowed viewers to enjoy amazing characters played by deaf
actresses , like the Oscar-winner Marlee Matlin .
‘Deaf community’ and/or ‘visibility’ conduct the candidate to the third and
fourth sentences of the text:
The deaf community is such a group that has experienced an increase in
visibility over the years, which has been a true joy to witness. Viewers have
gotten to see some incredible movie and TV characters played by deaf actors
plenty of stellar performances.
When we put this information together with the data already seen about
Marlee Matlin and her Oscar for Best Actress, we can conclude that option B
is correct.
Option A: Many people have been striving for decades to play good
characters in film and television, although this is harder for deaf actors.
The initial lines of the articles, which we had not analysed yet, correspond to
the assertion presented in this option:
Representation in film and television is something that so many people have
been striving for decades now. There’s still work to be done within the industry
to ensure that diverse experiences are being portrayed on screen, but
Hollywood has made strides in recent years.
About the situation of the deaf actors, we already saw that the ‘deaf
community is such a group that has experienced an increase in visibility over
the years’, although nothing is said about how hard it is for them to strive to
play good characters.
So the first phrase of the statement is true (‘[m]any people have been striving
for decades to play good characters in film and television’), but the second
one is not: we cannot prove that this is harder for deaf actors only with the
data extracted from the text. We have to dismiss this option.
Exercise 19
Japan has one of the oldest national anthems in the world. ‘Kimigayo’ is
the country’s single-verse national anthem, based on the words of a
classical Japanese waka poem written by an unknown author during
Japan’s Heian period (794–1185). As well as being one of the oldest
known national anthems, it is also the world’s shortest, standing at just a
single verse. The melody for the Japanese national anthem today uses
music composed by court composers Yoshiisa Oku and Akimori
Hayashi, arranged by the German composer Franz Eckert in 1880. The
title of the anthem is usually translated as ‘His Imperial Majesty’s
Reign’ and the short hymn really is about the worship of Japan’s
emperor, wishing their reign to be a long and prosperous one. As a
result, it’s shrouded in controversy. Many in Japan and other Asian
countries raise an eyebrow at the song’s association with militarism, and
the virtual worship of the emperor encouraged by its lyrics. ( Classic fm )
Which of the following statements is correct?
A) Japan has not only the second oldest national anthem, but also the
world’s shortest, standing at just a single verse.
B) All Japanese people unreservedly support the lyrics of their national
anthem.
C) Japan had the oldest national anthem in the world until its melody was
arranged by a German composer in 1880.
D) ‘Kimigayo’, the title of the anthem, is usually translated as ‘His Imperial
Majesty’s Reign’.
Solution :
Option D: ‘Kimigayo’ , the title of the anthem , is usually translated as
‘His Imperial Majesty’s Reign ’.
Normally, as we saw in previous exercises, a word as ‘Kimigayo’ would be a
good keyword for your text scanning, because it is expected to be uncommon
and not repeated (as it happens in this article, in fact).
Nonetheless, when we read the first two lines to corroborate the title of the
anthem (‘ Kimigayo’ is the country’s single-verse national anthem ), we can
observe that the topic of the article is precisely this, the national anthem of
Japan. So we can reasonably think that this word could probably appear more
often in this case, and we can try other keywords, such as ‘translated’ or
‘Imperial Majesty’, to locate the information that we need.
One way or another, we smoothly get to the fifth sentence of the passage:
The title of the anthem is usually translated as ‘His Imperial Majesty’s Reign
[…].
This accurately matches the statement, so option D is right. Now we only
need to have a quick look to the other options in order to discard a potential
mistake.
Option C: Japan had the oldest national anthem in the world until its
melody was arranged by a German composer in 1880 .
According to the first lines that we already read, the article is unambiguous:
Japan has one of the oldest national anthems in the world .
This is stated in present , so the anthem is still considered one of the oldest in
the world, regardless the arrangements made in the melody. We have to
discard this option .
Option B: All Japanese people unreservedly support the lyrics of their
national anthem .
The final part of the article says:
As a result, it’s shrouded in controversy . Many in Japan and other Asian
countries raise an eyebrow at the song’s association with militarism , and the
virtual worship of the emperor encouraged by its lyrics .
Therefore, on the contrary of the assertion in this option, not everybody in
Japan supports the lyrics of their anthem; we must eliminate it too.
Option A: Japan has not only the second oldest national anthem , but also
the world’s shortest , standing at just a single verse .
This statement provides additional information (‘the second oldest national
anthem’) that it is not supported by the article, which just declared:
As well as being one of the oldest known national anthems , it is also the
world’s shortest , standing at just a single verse .
We do not know how to rank Kimigayo among the oldest national anthems
(whether second, third, fourth, or somewhere else), so we must also delete
this option.
Exercise 20
Guinness World Records – originally the Guinness Book of Records –
the ultimate authority on record-breaking achievements, started out as
an idea for a book of facts to solve arguments in pubs. The idea came
about in the early 1950’s when Sir Hugh Beaver (1890- 1967), Managing
Director of the Guinness Brewery, attended a shooting party in County
Wexford. There, he and his hosts argued about the fastest game bird in
Europe and failed to find an answer in any reference book. In 1954,
recalling his shooting party argument, Sir Hugh had the idea for a
Guinness promotion based on the idea of settling pub arguments and
invited the twins Norris (1925-2004) and Ross McWhirter (1925-75) who
were fact-finding researchers from Fleet Street to compile a book of facts
and figures. After an initial research phase, work began on writing the
book, which took 13 and a half 90-hour weeks, including weekends and
bank holidays. Little did the McWhirters know that taking shape was a
book that would go on to become an all-time best seller. ( Guinness World
Records )
Which of the following statements is correct?
A) The Guinness Book of Records started out as an idea for a book to solve
arguments in pubs then frequented by journalists and researchers from
Fleet Street.
B) The McWhirter twins worked on the book for 13.5 weeks, 90 hours per
business week, plus weekends and bank holidays.
C) Ross McWhirter outlived his twin brother by almost 30 years.
D) Writing the book took the McWhirters around 1200 hours in total.
Solution :
When we have a look at the answer options, we detect that options D and C
are shorter, so, once again, we will start checking options from D to A.
Option D: Writing the book took the McWhirters around 1200 hours in
total .
Note that the relevant information to check option D is again at the final part
of the article. We can locate it by the term ‘hour’:
After an initial research phase, work began on writing the book , which took
13 and a half 90-hour weeks , including weekends and bank holidays. Little
did the McWhirters know that taking shape was a book that would go on to
become an all-time best seller.
We will need a bit of numerical reasoning – linked to verbal skills – in this
exercise.
According to the passage, writing the book took 13.5 weeks, employing 90-
hours per week.
So, to calculate the total number of hours employed in this task, we have to
multiply both figures:
13.5 weeks * 90 hours/weeks
You can verify that, with this operation, you will obtain a figure measured in
hours (your target):
13.5 weeks * 90 hours/weeks = ???? hours
We have to face the obstacle of (most likely) not having a calculator available
in our verbal reasoning test. And of course we recommend that you never use
calculators in your practice of verbal exercises.
So we need to perform some mental calculations, or at least estimations, to
solve the operation above: 13.5 * 90 .
In principle, to avoid working with decimals , we can eliminate the 0.5 and
simply estimate 13 * 90.
This operation could be done without difficulty with your pen and paper,
which are always allowed for all reasoning tests [3] . This way, you could
multiply 13 * 9 and then add a zero to your result.
Still, we want to simplify even more your calculations in order to ensure that
all candidates, no matter how hard they find arithmetic, are able to mentally
solve their exercises.
Our advice is to round figures when possible by using multiples of 10 .
So we can break down the previous multiplication, 13 * 90, into two parts:
10 * 90, and
3 * 90
We can do this because of the basic properties of multiplications, but, even if
you do not remember them since your school days, you can deduce this
through the particular exercise: for example, we can suppose that the authors
of the Guinness book were first working for 10 weeks, 90 hours per week,
and then other 3 weeks, 90 hours per week too. The total amount of time has
to match the initial problem, that is, (10 + 3) * 90.
Using this little ‘shortcut’, we have simplified a lot our calculation, which can
be performed now mentally and in a few seconds:
10 * 90 = 900
3 * 90 = 270 (you can do 3 * 9 and then add a zero)
Total time of work: 900 + 270 = 1170 hours
(This addition is equivalent to 900 + 200 + 70, if you need to see it more
clearly) .
Finally, this result (1170 hours) is close enough to the statement in option D
(around 1200 hours), and we can select it as the correct answer.
If you still have some available time in your exam, you can be more precise
and add to your result the half week (0.5) that we skipped before to avoid
working with decimals.
You only need to reason this way: if the authors worked for 90 hours per
week, for how long did they work in half a week?
Obviously, 45 hours (that is, 90/2).
Then, we are ready to put the icing on the cake; we add these 45 hours to our
previous result and get the exact total time it took these authors to write the
book:
1170 + 45 = 1215 hours
(This is equivalent to 1170 + 40 + 5).
This final result is even closer to the answer option that we have selected.
Note that, despite our long, detailed explanation of this procedure to simplify
figures and calculations, you would not need more than 30 or 40 seconds to
carry out the simple operations presented here, if you use our tips and
shortcuts.
We remind you that our two books on numerical reasoning are at your
disposal to help you improve and practise your skills in this field.
Option C: Ross McWhirter outlived his twin brother by almost 30 years .
With the aim of assessing this statement, we must check the death dates of
both brothers. This information is noticeably provided by the text: ‘the twins
Norris (1925-2004 ) and Ross McWhirter (1925-75 )’ .
Thus, Ross McWhirter did not outlive his twin brother; in fact, he died first,
in 1975. It was Norris who outlived Ross by almost 30 years (more precisely,
2004 – 1975 = 29 years). This option is wrong.
Option B: The McWhirter twins worked on the book for 13.5 weeks , 90
hours per business week , plus weekends and bank holidays .
According to the data that we already analysed, this option is adding some
information not supported by the text. It says ‘business week’ and it assumes
that the twins worked additional hours during weekends and bank holidays.
As we explained in our initial recommendations, we are not allowed to make
assumptions or add external information to answer these verbal exercises. So
we cannot accept this alternative either.
Option A: The Guinness Book of Records started out as an idea for a book
to solve arguments in pubs then frequented by journalists and researchers
from Fleet Street .
The validity of the first assertion in this option can be confirmed literally in
the first lines of the article:
Guinness World Records – originally the Guinness Book of Records – the
ultimate authority on record-breaking achievements, started out as an idea for
a book of facts to solve arguments in pubs .
Then, we have to verify if pubs were frequented at that time by journalists
and researchers from Fleet Street.
Note that this place in London is well-known worldwide because most British
national newspapers operated from here for centuries, and its pubs were
frequented by journalists, so the term ‘Fleet Street’ remains a metonym (a
concept used to refer to another closely associated) for the British national
press. This is, of course, common knowledge, so using this term here could
be a ‘trap’ for the candidate, if this link between concepts is not included in
the passage too. We proceed to scan the text to look for this term:
In 1954 , […] Sir Hugh had the idea for a Guinness promotion based on the
idea of settling pub arguments and invited the twins Norris (1925-2004) and
Ross McWhirter (1925-75) who were fact-finding researchers from Fleet
Street to compile a book of facts and figures.
Thus, the only reference to Fleet Street is made about the origin of the
McWhirters, and we cannot use the external knowledge on this famous street
to affirm that its pubs were then (in 1954) frequented by journalists and
researchers, even if this is completely true, as it is.
For this reason, we must discard this option too.
Interestingly, we, ‘verbal reasoners’, are also ‘fact-finders’ (like the
McWhirter twins!), but – fortunately for us – our search scope is limited to
the lines of the articles that we have to scan and analyse: we can only accept
facts that are fully proven by the passage.
By the way, you can see that, along this book, we have set more ‘D correct
answers’ than the average, as a little gift to our most creative readers and,
especially, to those ones who acquired this second volume to deepen and
progress in solving techniques and new shortcuts for verbal reasoning tests.
Still, we consider that analysing the options in the natural or reverse order
will not have an additional advantage in your exam and it is just a matter of
personal choice, unless one of them is shorter and can be assessed faster , as
we have described and practised in our book.
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In this last chapter, we are going to summarise our method and strategies to
solve verbal reasoning questions, and bring together all the tips and
recommendations that we have presented throughout our two books in this
field.
We propose this systematic method to deal with these exercises:
1) Read the first sentence of the text passage, to get an outline of the
topic, and especially if you are going to check the answer options from A
to D.
2) Read the standard question, to verify if it asks you for the correct or
incorrect answer.
3) Read the answer options, taking mental notes of their keywords. You
can do this separately for each option and proceed to step 4 (our
recommendation for most candidates) or with the four options in a row.
Analysing them from A to D, or from D to A, is a matter of personal
preference, unless one of them is shorter; in that case, we recommend
starting with that option, because it can be assessed faster.
4) Check the answer options against the information provided by the
passage, using the scanning technique, to eliminate the ones that cannot
be proven by using only that information.
5) Select the response option fully supported by the text.
Next, after combining our experience and practice throughout our two books,
we suggest some strategies and recommendations that will be helpful to
improve your performance in these tests.
We have classified them into two groups :
a) Practical tips:
- Be cautious with insufficient information or ‘cannot say’
statements; never use outside knowledge and do not make
assumptions .
- In line with the previous, be careful with topics that are familiar to
you , because of your studies or professional experience.
- Highlight the keywords that take the meaning of a statement to an
extreme point, that is to say, not admitting any exceptions : e.g.,
“always”, ”never”, “all”, “none”… For this reason, they are more
likely to be incorrect and are frequently used as pitfalls.
- Pay attention to keywords that limit the scope of the information
provided in the text passage, for example: particular, specific,
various, certain… To select the right answer, you should avoid
making generalisations on a larger group that the one specified in the
text.
- Do not forget to check the standard question : even though the vast
majority of EPSO verbal reasoning tests ask you to select the correct
or true answer. In the opposite case, the incorrect answer will be the
one that is fully disproven by the information in the text passage.
- After finding your right answer to the exercise , have a quick look at
the other options , unless you are running out of time at the exam:
sometimes more than one interpretation is possible, or the precision
of a statement could be improved by others.
b) General recommendations:
[1]
We recommend our books on numerical reasoning in case you wish to improve your skills in this
essential field:
How to succeed in EPSO numerical reasoning tests: https://www.amazon.es/succeed-EPSO-numerical-
reasoning-tests/dp/1096623943 .
How to succeed in EPSO numerical reasoning tests, volume 2 : ( https://www.amazon.es/succeed-
EPSO-numerical-reasoning-tests/dp/1679061488 ).
[2]
This is different from some strategies that we explained in our books for numerical and abstract
reasoning tests, e.g., distributing some right items over several options is hard to avoid if the test
designer wants to keep them ‘attractive’ to the candidate.
[3]
You should check any potential change in future competitions by carefully reading the respective
Notice of Competition.