Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Comparison Sheet

    Uploaded by

    Pawan Kumar

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Comparison Sheet

    Uploaded by

    Pawan Kumar
    11 views10 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    11 views10 pages

    Comparison Sheet

    Uploaded by

    Pawan Kumar

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 10

    As per Alignment Sheet

    Span No. of Submerged Weight


    SL.NO PIPELINE Installation Flooded Operation Anode Installation Flooded Operation
    1 SF-BHS 23.1 23.7 18.2 11 1414.3 2180.2 2026.3
    2 SQ-BHS 23.1 23.7 18.2 21 1414.3 2176.2 202.5
    3 HRG-HX 13.9 14.1 11.3 16 780.9 942.9 974.9
    4 HSC-HRG 27.5 28.5 23.9 25 1310.3 2424.1 2249
    5 HSD-HRC 28.8 29.6 24.9 25 2285.2 3398.4 3282.2
    6 HS-HRG 21.8 22.5 18.7 11 1152.6 1844.4 1784.4
    7 IU-ICG 28.6 29.6 22.8 20 1310.9 2492.2 2914.1
    8 NM-MNP 21 26.4 27.2 31 1586.4 2491.5 2313.8
    9 SB-SA 21 21.6 16.4 9 1092 1614.1 1510.5
    10 SE-MSP 22.7 23.4 17.9 17 1152.6 1899.9 1748.8
    11 SJ2-SA 22.7 23.4 17.9 10 1153.8 1899.9 1748.8
    12 SV-SHD 22.7 23.4 17.9 38 1152.6 1899.9 1748.8
    13 ZB-ICD 28.6 29.6 22.8 22 1310.9 2492.2 2670.9
    14 WI2-N3 24.6 24.3 17.4 71 1153.8 1899.9 1748.8
    15 HE-HRG 25 25.8 21.6 23 1297.3 2129.1 2007.8
    16 N16-MNP 24.1 24.7 17.7 27 1413.1 2176.2 2291.3
    17 MNW-N15 24.7 25.4 18.3 57 1152.6 2096.3 1899.9
    18 N12-NS 18.6 19 13.5 24 982.7 1310.4 1310.4
    19 RS8-ID 21 21.6 16.4 49 1092 1614.1 1510.5

    As per Reports
    As per Pipeline Span Report As per CP As per On-Bottom Stability Report
    Span No. of Submerged Weight Dry
    SL.NO PIPELINE Installation Flooded Operation Anode Installation Flooded Operation Weight
    1 NM-MNP 26.6 26.8 19.2 31 1578.1 2487.3 2305.6
    2 IU-ICG 27.9 28.1 22.4 20 1310.9 2492.2 2914.1
    3 SV-SHD 20.7 20.8 16.5 38 1152.6 1899.9 1748.8
    4 N16-MNP 25.6 26.0 18.4 28 1413.1 2104.9 2025.0
    5 WI2-N3 24.1 24.5 17.1 51 1153.8 1845.6 1748.8
    6 SJ2-SA 21.3 21.5 17.1 10 1153.8 1899.9 1748.8
    7 SQ-BHS 20.9 21.0 16.8 21 1414.3 2176.2 2025.0
    8 SF-BHS 20.9 21.0 16.8 11 1413.1 2176.2 2022.1
    9 SB-SA 19.5 19.6 15.6 9 1092.0 1614.1 1510.5
    10 RS8-ID 19.3 19.4 15.5 56 1092.0 1614.1 1510.5
    11 ZB-ICD 26.6 26.8 19.6 22 1310.9 2492.2 2670.9
    12 SE-MSP 21.1 21.3 17.0 17 1152.6 1899.9 1748.8
    13 MNW-N15 25.0 25.4 17.5 44 1152.6 2040.8 1899.9
    14 N12-NS 19.2 19.4 12.9 24 982.7 1310.4 1310.4
    15 HSD-HRC 29.0 29.7 25.9 21 2285.2 3521.5 3401.7
    16 HSC-HRG 27.8 28.5 25.0 25 1452.6 2547.2 2304.8
    17 HS-HRG 22.3 22.8 19.8 11 1152.6 1844.4 1748.8
    18 HE-HRG 25.3 25.9 22.6 23 1297.3 2129.1 2007.8 2851.37
    19 HRG-HX 14.6 14.8 12.3 18 780.9 942.9 942.9
    As per Reports
    As per Pipeline Span Report As per CP Report As per On-Bottom Stability Report
    Span Submerged Weight
    No. of Anode
    SL.NO PIPELINE Installation Flooded Operation Installation Flooded
    1 NM-MNP 26.6 26.8 19.2 31 1578.1 2487.3
    2 IU-ICG 27.9 28.1 22.4 20 1310.9 2492.2
    3 SV-SHD 20.7 20.8 16.5 38 1152.6 1899.9
    4 N16-MNP 25.6 26.0 18.4 28 1413.1 2104.9
    5 WI2-N3 24.1 24.5 17.1 51 1153.8 1845.6
    6 SJ2-SA 21.3 21.5 17.1 10 1153.8 1899.9
    7 SQ-BHS 20.9 21.0 16.8 21 1414.3 2176.2
    8 SF-BHS 20.9 21.0 16.8 11 1413.1 2176.2
    9 SB-SA 19.5 19.6 15.6 9 1092.0 1614.1
    10 RS8-ID 19.3 19.4 15.5 56 1092.0 1614.1
    11 ZB-ICD 26.6 26.8 19.6 22 1310.9 2492.2
    12 SE-MSP 21.1 21.3 17.0 17 1152.6 1899.9
    13 MNW-N15 25.0 25.4 17.5 44 1152.6 2040.8
    14 N12-NS 19.2 19.4 12.9 24 982.7 1310.4
    15 HSD-HRC 29.0 29.7 25.9 21 2285.2 3521.5
    16 HSC-HRG 27.8 28.5 25.0 25 1452.6 2547.2
    17 HS-HRG 22.3 22.8 19.8 11 1152.6 1844.4
    18 HE-HRG 25.3 25.9 22.6 23 1297.3 2129.1
    19 HRG-HX 14.6 14.8 12.3 18 780.9 942.9

    anode KP
    0.00/146.4/1.859/2.005
    ottom Stability Report
    merged Weight Dry anode KP
    Operation Weight
    2305.6
    2914.1
    1748.8
    2025.0
    1748.8
    1748.8
    2025.0
    2022.1
    1510.5
    1510.5
    2670.9
    1748.8
    1899.9
    1310.4
    3401.7
    2304.8
    1748.8
    2007.8 2851.37
    942.9
    SL.NO PIPELINE No. of Anode IN ALS No. of Anode in CP report rev C3
    1 SF-BHS 11 11
    2 SQ-BHS 2+17+2=21 2+17+2=21
    3 HRG-HX 2+14+2=18 2+14+2=18
    4 HSC-HRG 2+20+2=24 2+21+2=25
    5 HSD-HRC 2+17+2-21 2+17+2-21
    6 HS-HRG 11 11
    7 IU-ICG 2+16+2=20 2+16+2=20
    8 NM-MNP 3+26+2=31 3+26+2=31
    9 SB-SA 9 9
    10 SE-MSP 17 17
    11 SJ2-SA 10 10
    12 SV-SHD 4+31+3=38 4+31+3=38
    13 ZB-ICD 2+18+2=22 2+18+2=22
    14 WI2-N3 2+26+19+2+21=71 3+26+20+2=51
    15 HE-HRG 2+19+2=23 2+19+2=23
    16 N16-MNP 2+23+2=27 2+24+2=28
    17 MNW-N15 44 1+14+28+1=44
    18 N12-NS 2+20+2=24 2+20+2=24
    19 RS8-ID 3+25+21+2=51 3+30+21+2=56
    PART REPLACEMENT PIPELINE PROJECT
    QA/QC FOR CROSSING DRAWING

    DATE : 31/05/2024

    Sl No. Questions oceanergy WERL


    How can we give space of 350mm between
    proposed and existing pipeline without any
    1 open
    information of burial depth and exposed
    height.

    As per standards, crossing angle need to be


    2 greater than equal to 30 deg which is not open
    everywhere possible.

    3 Grout bags need to be installed at mimimum open


    distance of 1m from existing pipeline is not
    possible due to small crossing angles which
    are less than 30 deg

    4 350mm gap has taken from OD of existing open


    pipeline, there must be cwc coating and
    marine growth over the OD of pipeline.

    We suggest sleepers or hole type grout bags


    5 at some crossing which are less than 30 deg open
    crossing angle
    diameter of existing pipeline
    concrete coatting of the existing pipeline
    marine growth of the existing pipeline
    minimum space
    TOTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED PIPELINE AND SEABED
    IPELINE PROJECT

    TIME :

    ONGC REMARKS

    457.2
    350
    807.2

    457.2
    100
    100
    350
    1007.2

    You might also like