unit1notes
unit1notes
unit1notes
The economic problem, often referred to as the "basic economic problem," arises
because resources are scarce, while human wants and needs are virtually unlimited. This
creates a fundamental issue of how to allocate limited resources to satisfy as many
wants and needs as possible.
1. Scarcity: Resources such as land, labor, and capital are finite and insufficient to
meet the unlimited desires of people. Scarcity forces individuals, businesses, and
governments to make choices about how to use resources efficiently.
2. Choice: Since not all wants can be satisfied, individuals and societies must
choose which wants to fulfill. This involves prioritizing the allocation of resources.
3. Opportunity Cost: Every choice has a trade-off. The opportunity cost is the value
of the next best alternative that is foregone when a decision is made. For example,
if a government spends money on healthcare, the opportunity cost might be the
reduction of spending on education or infrastructure.
This problem is universal and is the foundation of many economic theories and decision-
making processes across households, businesses, and governments.
Concept of Economies (capitalist, socialist and mixed economies),
• Key Features:
• Key Features:
o Central Planning: The government decides what goods and services are
produced, how they are distributed, and at what prices.
Mixed Economy:
• Key Features:
• Examples: Most countries today, including India, France, the UK, and many
Scandinavian nations, follow a mixed economic system.
• microeconomics
• macroeconomics.
For example, microeconomics studies how individual consumers make choice of goods
and services they want to consume and how they allocate their limited income between
the goods and services of their choice to maximize their total economic welfare.
It studies what factors and forces determine the level of national output or national
income, rate of economic growth, employment, price level, and economic welfare.
The microeconomic theories and tools of analysis that provide a logical basis and ways
and means to find a reasonable solution to business problems constitute the
microeconomic scope of managerial economics. The main microeconomic theories that
fall within the scope of managerial economics are following: Theory of Consumer
Demand, Theory of Production, Theory of Cost, Theory of Price Determination and Theory
of Capital and Investment Decisions.
The primary function of managers is to take appropriate decisions and implement them
effectively to achieve the objective of the organization to maximum possible extent, given
the resources. Application of economics contributes a great deal to managerial decision-
making as it provides guidance in finding an appropriate solution to the business
problem.
economic theories, concepts and tools of analysis are applied as roadmap to find
solution to business problems.
• Elastic Vs. Inelastic Goods: Economists can decide price sensitivity of products using
a price elasticity analysis. This will ensure that it becomes easy to take decisions related
to marketing and pricing of goods.
• Investments: Many managerial economic tools and analysis models are used to assist
in making investing decisions both for corporations as well as individual investors. These
tools are used to make stock market investing decisions and decisions on capital
investments for a business.
• Risk: Uncertainty exits in every business and managerial economics can help reduce
risk through uncertainty model analysis and decision-theory analysis. Statistical
probability theory is largely used to provide potential scenarios for business enterprises
while making decisions.
The concept of a firm refers to a business organization or entity that engages in the
production, purchase, and sale of goods or services to generate profit. Firms operate
within the broader context of the economy, playing a key role in producing goods,
providing employment, and creating value for consumers and shareholders. Firms are
central to economic activity and decision-making, and they vary in size, structure, and
purpose, depending on their industry, goals, and ownership.
1. Production:
2. Profit Maximization:
o A firm typically operates with the objective of maximizing profit. This means
that firms seek to produce goods or services at the lowest cost possible
while selling them at the highest price that the market will allow,
considering competition and demand.
3. Decision-Making Unit:
5. Market Interaction:
o Firms interact with both consumers (to whom they sell goods and services)
and suppliers (from whom they buy inputs). In addition, firms compete with
other firms in their industry, influencing prices and innovation.
1. Sole Proprietorship:
2. Partnership:
3. Corporation:
5. Cooperatives:
6. Government-Owned Firms:
o These firms are owned and operated by the government. They often provide
essential public services like transportation, healthcare, or utilities.
Functions of a Firm:
1. Production of Goods and Services:
2. Employment Generation:
o Firms aim to generate profit, which can be reinvested in the business for
growth or distributed to shareholders as dividends. Profitability is crucial
for the sustainability and expansion of the firm.
5. Resource Allocation:
o Firms allocate resources like labor, capital, and raw materials to produce
goods and services. Efficient resource allocation leads to greater
productivity and better economic outcomes.
6. Risk Management:
Goals of a Firm:
1. Profit Maximization:
2. Growth:
3. Survival:
o Especially for new or smaller firms, survival is a key goal, which involves
ensuring sufficient revenue to cover costs and weather market
fluctuations.
4. Social Responsibility:
5. Customer Satisfaction:
3. Oligopoly: A few large firms dominate the market, and each firm’s decisions affect
the others.
4. Monopoly: A single firm dominates the market, controlling prices and supply.
The concept of a market refers to any structure or system where buyers and sellers
interact to exchange goods, services, or resources. Markets can take different forms,
from physical locations like shops or farmer’s markets to digital platforms such as e-
commerce websites. They play a critical role in determining the price and quantity of
goods or services based on the forces of supply and demand.
o These are the commodities or offerings that are being exchanged. Markets
exist for both tangible products (e.g., food, clothing, electronics) and
intangible services (e.g., banking, consulting, healthcare).
3. Price Determination:
4. Exchange Mechanism:
o A market facilitates the exchange of goods and services, often through the
use of money. However, bartering or credit-based exchanges also occur in
some markets.
5. Competition:
o Sellers compete with each other to attract buyers by offering better prices,
quality, or services. Buyers also compete when there is a limited supply of
goods or services.
Types of Markets:
o Local Markets: Buyers and sellers are from the same area, and
transactions take place within a limited geographical region (e.g., local
grocery stores, farmers' markets).
o Product Market: A market where final goods or services are traded (e.g.,
consumer goods, electronics, food).
o Factor Market: A market where factors of production such as labor, land,
and capital are bought and sold (e.g., labor market, real estate market).
3. Based on Structure:
4. Based on Time:
o Spot Market: Where goods or assets are traded for immediate delivery.
o Futures Market: Where goods or assets are traded for future delivery at a
predetermined price.
5. Digital or Physical:
Functions of a Market:
1. Price Discovery: Markets help determine the price of goods and services based
on the interactions of buyers and sellers.
2. Efficient Allocation of Resources: Resources are allocated where they are most
valued, as buyers and sellers respond to price signals.
3. Facilitating Trade: Markets enable the exchange of goods and services, creating
opportunities for buyers and sellers to meet and transact.
This concept aligns with the theory of laissez-faire economics, where the market finds
equilibrium through the people engaging in it instead of through the intervention of
government or other governing bodies. Invisible hand economics provides context for
how a market can stabilise itself by people acting with their own interests in mind, which
benefits everyone within the economy. As a foundational element in rational choice
theory, the invisible hand concept suggests that consumers are rational in making
economic decisions, leading to balance within the economy.
The concept of the “invisible hand” was invented by the Scottish Enlightenment
thinker, Adam Smith. It refers to the invisible market force that brings a free market to
equilibrium with levels of supply and demand by actions of self-interested individuals.
The concept was first introduced by Smith in “The Theory of Moral Sentiments” in 1759
and he used it again in his book, “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of
Nations,” which was published in 1776. The theory states that individuals that trade in a
free market pursuing their own interests will end up maximizing social benefits.
Furthermore, the benefits derived from the free market are maximum and more than
those in a regulated and planned economy.
According to the theory, the motivation to maximize profits drives a free economy. Every
individual, acting in their self-interest, generates a demand or supply which compels
others to buy or sell goods or services. In return, he either receives or pays compensation
and one party makes a profit. In this process of exchange in a free economy, resources
are allocated in the most efficient manner.
The invisible hand theory basically tries to convey that without any intervention, if all
individuals in the economy act in their best self-interest, the result is automatically in the
best interests of the economy. The results will always be better than those of a centrally
planned and regulated economy.
If each consumer is allowed to choose what and how much to buy and each producer is
free to choose its production quantity, technique, and prices, it will be beneficial, as a
whole, to the economy. Producers would use an efficient method of production to cut
costs and charge low prices to maximize revenue. Consumers would buy from sellers
who offer the lowest price. Also, investors would invest in industries that maximize their
return. All this would take place automatically if the economy is set free.
Working on the principle of segregation of managers from owners, Marris proposed that
owners (shareholders) aim at profits and market share, whereas managers aim at better
salary, job security and growth. These two sets of goals can be achieved by maximising
balanced growth of the firm (G), which is dependent on the growth rate of demand for the
firm's products (gD) and growth rate of capital supply to the firm (gC). Hence growth rate
of the firm is balanced when the demand for its product and the capital supply to the firm
grow at the same rate.
Maximise g = gD = gC
Marris further said that firms face two constraints in the objective of maximisation of
balanced growth, which are explained below:
The utility of managers is a function of salary, power, status and job security which they
aim to maximize.
On the other hand the utility of owners which they aim to maximize, is a function of profits
, capital , output , market share, public esteem.
Marris feels that the conflict between the maximizing behavior of owner’s and
shareholders is not so great as the variables in the two utility functions are strongly
correlated to the size of the firm. They have a common interest in the size of the firm, and
therefore, are primarily concerned with maximization of the rate of growth of size.
Policy variables: The model identifies several policy variables that a firm can use to
achieve balanced growth, including:
o Financial policy: The firm can choose its financial policy, which determines
the liquidity ratio, debt ratio, and retention ratio
o Diversification rate: The firm can decide to expand its product range,
change the style of its existing products, or both
o Advertising and R&D: The firm can decide how much to spend on
advertising and R&D
Prof. Baumol in his book Business Behaviour, Value and Growth (1967) has presented a
managerial theory of the firm based on sales maximisation. He discusses two models of
sales maximisation: a static model and a dynamic model.
2. The firm aims at maximising its total sales revenue in the long run subject to a profit
constraint.
3. The firm’s minimum profit constraint is set competitively in terms of the current
market value of its shares.
4. The firm is oligopolistic whose cost curves are U-shaped and the demand curve is
downward sloping. Its total cost and revenue curves are also of the conventional type.
The Model:
Baumol’s findings of oligopoly firms in America reveal that they follow the sales maximisation
objective. According to Baumol, with the separation of ownership and control in modern
corporations, managers seek prestige and higher salaries by trying to expand company sales
even at the expense of profits. Revenue or sales maximisation rather than profit maximisation
is consistent with the actual behaviour of firms.
Baumol cites evidence to suggest that short-run revenue maximisation may be consistent with
long-run profit maximisation. But sales maximisation is regarded as the short-run and long-run
goal of the management. Sales maximisation is not only a means but an end in itself.
1. A firm attaches great importance to the magnitude of sales and is much concerned about
declining.
2. If the sales of a firm are declining, banks, creditors and the capital market are not prepared
to provide finance to it.
3. Its own distributors and dealers might stop taking interest in it.
5. Firm reduces its managerial and other staff with fall in sales.
6. But if firm’s sales are large, there are economies of scale and the firm expands and earns
large profits.
7. Salaries of workers and management also depend to a large extent on more sales and the
firm gives them bonus and other facilities.
By sales maximisation, Baumol means maximisation of total revenue. It does not imply the
sale of large quantities of output but refers to the increase in money sales (in rupee, dollar, etc.).
Sales can increase up to the point of profit maximization where the marginal cost equals
marginal revenue.
If sales are increased beyond this point money sales may increase at the expense of profits. But
the oligopolistic firm wants its money sales to grow even though it earns minimum profits.
Minimum profits refer to the amount which is less Quantity than maximum profits. The
minimum profits are determined on the basis of firm’s need to maximize sales and also to
sustain growth of sales.
Minimum profits are required either in the form of retained earnings or new capital from the
market. The firm also needs minimum profits to finance future sales. Further, they are essential
for a firm for paying dividends on share capital and for meeting other financial requirements.
The output OK will not maximise sales as the minimum profits OM are not being covered by
total profits KS. For sales maximisation the firm should produce that level of output which not
only covers the minimum profits but also gives the highest total revenue consistent with it.
This level is represented by OD level of output where the minimum profits DC (=OM) are
consistent with DE amount of total revenue at the price DE/OD, (i.e., total revenue/total
output). Baumol’s model of sales maximisation points out that the profit maximisation output
OQ will be smaller than the sales maximisation output OD, and price higher than under sales
maximisation.
Baumol’s sales maximisation model has some important implications which make it superior
to the profit maximisation model of the firm.
1. The sales maximising firm prefers larger sales to profits. Since it maximises its revenue when
MR is zero, it will charge lower prices than that charged by the profit maximising firm.
2. It follows from the above that the sales maximising output will be larger than the profit
maximising output. In Figure 43.4, the profit maximisation firm produces OQ output while the
sales maximisation firm produces OQ1 output, OQ1 > OQ.
3. The sales maximiser would spend more on advertisement in order to earn larger revenue than
the profit maximiser subject to the minimum profit constraint.
4. There may be a conflict between pricing in the short-run and long-run. In the short-run, when
output cannot be increased, revenue can be increased by raising the price. But in the long- run,
it would in the interest of the sales maximisation firm to keep the price low in order to compete
more effectively for a large share of the market to earn more revenue.
5. The profit maximization firm is assumed to act rationally which goes against the actual
behaviour of firms. On the other hand, the Baumol firm behaves satisfactorily for the purpose
of earning minimum profits at a fair sales maximization output.
Criticism:
Model 1: A single–product model without advertising The total cost (TC) and total revenue
(TR) curves under the above assumptions are shown below in Figure 12.1. The curve (inverted
U) below the TR and TC curves is the total profit curve, obtained by deducting TC from TR
for every level of output (X). The maximisation of sales revenue for a firm occurs at a point
where the marginal revenue equals zero.
Model 2: A Single-product model with advertising In this model, the firm maximises sales
revenue subject to a minimum profit constraint, which is exogenously determined. An
important addition into this model is that of advertising expenditure and a crucial assumption
is that sales revenue rises with advertising expenditure (that is, ∂R a∂ > 0, where R = sales
revenue, a = advertising expenditure). Baumol also assumes that price remains constant, and
production costs are independent of advertising.
The dynamic model is an improvement over the static single-period model. The most serious
weakness of the static model is the short time-horizon of the firm and the treatment of the profit
constraint as an exogenously determined variable. These problems have been solved in the
dynamic model by incorporating an extended time-horizon and endogenizing the profit
constraint.
Assumptions 1) The firm maximises the rate of growth of sales over its lifetime. 2) Profit is the
main source of finance for growth of sales. It is an instrumental variable whose value is
endogenously determined. 3) Demand is downward sloping and costs curves are U-shaped.