169549690-JEDM-0607
169549690-JEDM-0607
169549690-JEDM-0607
Vol. 30 • No. 6
WHO’S
WHO IN
EUROPEAN EW
pg 2/ifc
276184
KOR Electronics
4/c
pg 3
Technology Survey:
News RWR/ESM/ELINT Systems 49
Ollie Holt
The Monitor 16 JED offers a detailed look at specifications for more
B-52 Jamming Variant than 40 RWR/ESM/ELINT receivers available from
Again Seeks DOD Blessing companies worldwide.
4
Book Review 58
Washington Report 26 Stormjammers: The Extraordinary Story of
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
Ups and Downs for EW In HASC FY08 Electronic Warfare Operations in the Gulf War
Defense Budget
8 Calendar
Features
12 From the President
Interview 30
Gérard Christmann, General Manager of 14 Letters
Electronic Combat Solutions, Thales Aerospace
56 New Products
Who’s Who in European EW 34
Gábor Zord 60 EW 101
After a period of market correction, European
companies have reorganized, reformed
65 AOC News
and emerged with a new spirit of regional
collaboration. JED takes a look at the varied
landscape of European EW programs and the 69 JED Sales Offices
European companies that support them.
69 Index of Advertisers
Interview 46
COL Laurie Buckhout, Chief, Electronic Warfare 70 JED Quick Look
Division, Army Asymmetric Warfare Office
Cover photos courtesy Eurofighter GmbH, Dassault Aviation, Gripen International
KB, Northrop Grumman, Eurocopter and Rheinmetall Landsysteme.
321053
Booz Allen
4/c
pg 5
the view
f ro m h e re
T
his month, most of big players in the defense market will descend on Sales Administration: Esther Biggs
Paris for a week of serious business. At Le Bourget, on the northern
EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD
edge of the city, the trade halls will be brimming with exhibitors and Roy Azevedo
attendees, while the bigger deals will be discussed in the corporate Deputy, Tactical Airborne Systems, and Manager,
EW, Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems
chalets that overlook the flight demonstrations. Mr. Edward Bair
In keeping with JED tradition, our cover story this month is about PEO Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Sensors, USA
Mr. Chris Bernhardt
Europe. I hope you enjoy reading Gábor Zord’s article about “Who’s Who” in Euro- President, ITT Electronic Systems
pean EW – a different spin from our previous feature stories about the region. Brig Gen Bruno Berthet
General Engineer of the Armament, DGA, French Air Force
European EW is going through an interesting period in its history. As with COL Laurie Buckhout
the United States, many European militaries are gaining a new appreciation for Chief, EW Division, Army Asymmetric Warfare Office, USA
CAPT Bill Chubb
EW. This is typical in any sustained military operation, where the enemy has the Program Manager, ATAPS Program Office
time and opportunity to locate and exploit weaknesses. Improvised explosive (PMA-272), NAVAIR, USN
Mr. Björn Erman
devices (IEDs) and IR threats are the major worries for European forces deployed President, Saab Avitronics
to Afghanistan and Iraq. In response, there has been significant investment in Mr. Gabriele Gambarara
General Manager, Elettronica S.p.A.
missile warning systems and flares for aircraft, as well as IED jammers for ground Mr. Hal Gershanoff
forces. Past Publisher, JED
Mr. Tony Grieco
While Europe’s EW spending is stronger today than it has been since the end Former Deputy for Electronic Warfare, OSD
6 of the Cold War, I wonder if these experiences will affect the way European gov- Mr. Walt Havenstein
President and CEO, BAE Systems Inc.
ernments view EW in their future strategic planning. Will EW achieve the level COL Gary Hopper
of importance it held during the Cold War? Or will EW planning fade into the Deputy Director, AFRL Sensors Directorate
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
Naylor, LLC
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, FL 32607
Phone: (800) 369-6220 • Fax: (352) 331-3525
www.naylor.com
©2007 Association of Old Crows/ Naylor, LLC. All rights reserved. The
contents of this publication may not be reproduced by any means, in
whole in part, without the prior written authorization of the publisher.
Editorial: The articles and editorials appearing in this magazine do not
represent an official AOC position, except for the official notices printed
in the “Association News” section or unless specifically identified as an
AOC position.
pg 7
www.dilabs.com
OCTOBER
AUSA Annual Meeting
October 8-10
Washington, DC
8 www.ausa.org
AOC 44th Annual Convention
October 28-31
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
Orlando, FL
Unclassified and Secret Sessions
316363 www.crows.org
DECEMBER
EW Symposium
December 5-6
Shrivenham, UK
www.dcmt.cranfield.ac.uk/
symposia/ew07 a
aaicorp.com
Innovation That Works is a registered trademark of AAI Corporation.
c ale ndar course s & seminars
JUNE Writing Solid CONOPS for US Advanced Electro-Optics for EW
Government Programs and Engineers and Managers Course
Operational Capability of Projects Course August 13-17
Helicopter EW Course July 24-26 Alexandria, VA
June 12-14 Alexandria, VA www.crows.org
Alexandria, VA www.crows.org
www.crows.org SEPTEMBER
AUGUST
JULY Advanced RF Electronic Warfare
ELINT/EW Databases Course Principles Course
Fundamental Principles of August 7-9 September 10-14
Electronic Warfare Course Alexandria, VA Atlanta, GA
(optional classified day) www.crows.org www.pe.gatech.edu
July 9-13
Alexandria, VA Advanced EW Course
www.crows.org (optional classified day)
September 17-21
Alexandria, VA
www.crows.org
Digital Radio Frequency Memory
(DRFM) Course
September 25-27
Atlanta, GA
www.pe.gatech.edu
ELINT and Modern Signals Course
September 25-28
Alexandria, VA
www.crows.org
OCTOBER
Operational Capability of
Helicopter EW Course
10 October 2-4
Alexandria, VA
www.crows.org
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
DECEMBER
Writing Solid CONOPS for US
Government Programs and
Projects Course
December 4-6
Alexandria, VA
www.crows.org
EO/IR Fundamentals for EW
Engineers and Managers Course
December 10-14
Alexandria, VA
www.crows.org a
Products
8000 Series Radar
Threat Simulator
Modular, scalable solutions
with enhanced UMOP
signal generation from 100
MHz to 40 GHz
RES 329964
(Radar Environment Simulators)
EWST
High fidelity radar, target,
ECM, and clutter modeling 4/c
for direct injection with
a radar using DRFM or
DSP technology
pg 11
MERTS
(Mobile EW and Radar Test System) Proven Microwave
Performance
The transportable and
www.herley.com
complete solution for radar
threat and ECM/target Herley EW Simulation Technology, Unit B9 Armstrong Mall, Southwood Business Park, Farnborough,
signal generation Hants, GU14 0NR, UK • Telephone: +44 01252 512951 • FAX: +44 01252 512428
www.herley.com • E-Mail: info@ewst.co.uk
Micro Systems Inc., a division of Herley, 35 Hill Avenue, Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548 • Telephone: 714-258-7675
FAX: 714-258-7609 • www.herley.com • E-Mail: RFsimulation@herley.com
message
f ro m the pre s ide nt
Association of Old Crows
1000 North Payne Street, Suite 300
Alexandria, VA 22314-1652
Phone: (703) 549-1600
Fax: (703) 549-2589
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Walter E. Wolf
President
F
or many the month of June is the finish to another academic year. For
Tony Brees
some it represents the graduation from student to the work force. For William “Buck” Clemons
those who have chosen to enter our high technology field, I welcome each Hal Gershanoff
Christopher Glaze
of you to an exciting time. Extreme technology is evident in every aspect Scott Martin
of the world around us and nothing could be truer than in the universe of Linda Palmer
Steven Umbaugh
an Old Crow – Electronic Warfare and Information Operations.
REGIONAL DIRECTORS
Military electronics is more digital than it ever has been, and has the promise Northeastern: Nino Amaroso
to provide systems that have what it takes to be truly multi-functional. In the near Mountain-Western: Ronald Poland
future, the difference between a radio, jammer or even a radar, will only be a matter Mid-Atlantic: Harvey Dahljelm
International I: René Kaenzig
of what the software or firmware is doing at that particular slice of time – it will be International II: Vacant
the same hardware. Southern: Michael “Mick” Riley
Central: Judith Westerheide
With the advances in digital technology, today’s Young Crows will be able to de- Northern Pacific: Joe Johnson
12 sign and produce systems that are smaller, use less power, are more reliable and more Southern Pacific: Vince Battaglia
operationally suitable than the systems on which many Old Crows cut their beaks. In APPOINTED DIRECTORS
David Hime
the past, EW systems were limited by the state of RF components, with many designs
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
Paul Westcott
restricted in growth capability – a must-have for the military to stay one step ahead PAST PRESIDENT
of our adversary’s advances in radar and threat systems. Next-generation systems Austin “Pepper” Thomas, Jr
will not only provide growth capability measurable in orders of magnitude, they also AOC STAFF
Don Richetti
will challenge Young Crows to upgrade capabilities much faster than ever before. Also Executive Director
inherent in digital EW systems is the ability to control much more of the system from richetti@crows.org
a distance. Andy Vittoria
Deputy Executive Director
As high-speed broadband networks emerge that connect our forces, so will EW vittoria@crows.org
systems be connected to not only to each other, but also to reachback capabilities, Carole H. Vann
such as real-time operation and reprogramming. Today’s UAV operators can literally Director of Administration
vann@crows.org
sit on the other side of the globe and operate nearly all aspects of the UAVs under
Shelley Frost
their control. Therefore, it is conceivable that in the future Young Crows will remotely Director, Convention and Education Programs
control many aspects of EW system operations in certain concepts of employment. frost@crows.org
This is not such a stretch of imagination, given that the flexible digital designs of Ken Miller, Director
Government and Industry Affairs
many deep-space systems have been just what were needed to work around an “in- kmiller@crows.org
flight” problem and save the mission. Jackie Kelly
The Old Crow force will need to pass on to the Young Crow generation the wisdom Conference Manager
kelly@crows.org
garnered from many experiences that tasked our brightest engineers to come up with
Glorianne O’Neilin
those “mission saving” solutions. What has really changed with time is the speed at Membership Manager
which Crows will be able to develop, test, field and update our systems. oneilin@crows.org
Clearly, as Old Crows have conquered many challenges in their time, the future of- Tanya Miller
Conference Assistant
fers equally exciting challenges for many Young Crows to experience and master. It is tmiller@crows.org
the heritage of Crows to rise to technical challenges and to solve the hard problems. Jennifer Bahler
My challenge to each Young Crow is to continually seek out new ways to dominate the Conference Registrar
bahler@crows.org
electromagnetic spectrum and remain ahead of our adversaries.
Andrew Schappert
– Walter Wolf IT Manager
schappert@crows.org
YOU’D BE SURPRISED
WHERE YOU FIND US
pg 13
Thales is a world
leader in mission-
critical information
systems, working for
aerospace, defence and
security markets. We
support government agencies
and major corporations with
comprehensive management services. The group’s civil and
military businesses develop in parallel, to serve a single objective:
the security of people, property and nations.
www.thalesgroup.com/aerospace
JED welcomes letters to the editor. Please send to editor@
crows.org. Letters should include a phone number and contact e-
letters mail. All letters will be verified prior to publication. Letters may be
f ro m o u r re ade r s edited for length, accuracy, clarity and to conform to JED style.
CONSIDERING CROSS-EYE JAMMING because during war operations thousands of decoys may be
I read with a great interest the article “Airborne Towed De- necessary. CE jamming has a negligible life cycle cost: once
coys” in the JED issue of December 2006. installed it will work forever.
In the past I was involved in the “competition” between the In the past the competition was won by Towed Decoys because
“Cross-Eye” (CE) and the “Towed Decoy” Jamming techniques. I Cross-Eye appeared much too risky. In fact, we have to admit
can summarize the comparison in the following lines: that the Towed Decoy functioning principles are much easier to
1. Miss distance: Naturally, the Towed Decoy can provide understand than that of Cross-Eye jamming. And though Towed
better miss distance in beam directions, where, unfortunately, Decoys may limit aircraft maneuvering performances, Cross-Eye
very few missiles can operate due to the poor clutter-target dis- jamming required the implementation of advanced technology.
crimination (target and clutter will have the same Doppler!). On Fortunately, the Italian Air Force had a chance to demon-
the contrary, Cross-Eye will provide the maximum miss distance strate both the feasibility and the effectiveness of the CE jam-
in the front/rear sectors where mostly missiles are. ming technique by flying successfully with an MB-339 equipped
2. Applicability: Repeater type Towed Decoys are practically appli- with a prototype of an ECM capable of Cross-Eye jamming.
cable only to CW waveforms and therefore only to semi-active missiles. The JED article was asking why the business around Towed
Better chance to be valid against Pulse Doppler radar will exist for Decoys is decreasing: Can it be because operators are beginning
Fiber Optic Towed Decoys, when they will be ready with enough ERP. to understand that there are other more effective jamming
On the contrary, Cross-Eye jamming can be applicable against all the techniques? (In the article itself, it is mentioned that some
practical threats, including semi-active missiles (last CE generation). improvement to Towed Decoys can come from Cross-Eye!).
Moreover it should be noted that, where the Towed Decoy It appears that the CE jamming performances are superior
will not tell you if it will work, CE jamming provides immediate to that of Towed Decoys. From the industrial point of view, the
tell-back if the threat has been engaged. cost of CE could be less than that achieved with Towed Decoys.
3. Acquisition cost: Towed Decoy systems can be cheaper Is it the appropriate time to discuss seriously, without preju-
(depending on the number of decoys) than CE jamming, which dices, the opportunity to adopt Cross-Eye jamming?
requires two transmitters. Filippo Neri
4. Life cycle cost: Towed Decoys can be very expensive, President, Virtualabs srl.
14
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
www.drs.com
In 2006:
EXHIBIT TODAY! 1,280 registered attendees
Government spending in EW and IO has never been visited the exhibit floor
stronger. The Global War on Terrorism is driving 24 countries were represented
major investment in areas such as IED jammers and
IR countermeasures. In addition, the DOD is ramping
up new programs in airborne electronic attack, signals
Current Sponsors:
intelligence and communications jamming. You can reach
those customers when you exhibit at the AOC’s 44th BAE Systems
International Symposium and Convention. Raytheon
Northrop Grumman
We are five months from the show and exhibit space is
more than 75 percent sold. Last year in Washington, DC, ITT Electronic Systems
the exhibition floor sold out early and several companies SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems
were unable to reach potential customers. Secure your L-3 Communications
exhibit space ASAP! Terma A/S
Symetrics Industries, LLC
www.crows.org Esterline Defense Group
t he monit or
news
B-52 JAMMING VARIANT AGAIN SEEKS
DOD BLESSING
The US Air Force’s proposed B-52 Core Compo-
nent Jammer (CCJ) program was set for another
high-level Pentagon review as this issue of JED
went to press. The Office of Program Analysis & NEXT-GENERATION USAF HIGH-ALTITUDE
Evaluation (PA&E) within the Office of the Sec- SIGINT SYSTEM ON TRACK
retary of Defense was slated to brief the Deputy The Airborne Signals Intelligence Payload (ASIP) successfully
Advisors Working Group (DAWG) on May 23. The completed its sensor and aircraft calibration flight tests on the Air
DAWG is chaired by the deputy secretary of de- Force’s high-altitude U-2 reconnaissance aircraft in late April and
fense and includes each service’s vice chief of began full SIGINT performance testing. Flight testing of ASIP, the
staff. The Air Force hoped to gain the body’s next-generation SIGINT system for the Air Force’s “high-fliers” (U-2
support for launching the B-52 CCJ develop- and Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle), began on the U-2 last
ment effort, currently an unfunded priority, in December. Northrop Grumman Missions Systems-ESL (Sacramento,
FY09 or FY10. CA) is the ASIP prime contractor and is delivering five develop-
A few years ago, the Air Force committed it- ment systems. The bulk of these will enter operational service next
self to provision of a manned stand-off jamming year with the U-2 fleet, which the Air Force now plans to retire
(SOJ) aircraft (as a key piece of the DOD’s planned completely by FY13. Production systems, to be ordered initially in
airborne electronic attack (AEA) “system of sys- FY09, will be fielded on the Global Hawk beginning in 2012. The
tems”) after the Navy retires its carrier-based first of nearly a year of ASIP flight tests on the first new RQ-4B
16 EA-6B Prowlers in 2012 and fields new EA-18G Global Hawk Block 30 SIGINT variant, currently being assembled by
Growlers dedicated only to Navy missions. B-52s Northrop Grumman Integrated Systems (San Diego, CA), is sched-
fitted with long-range jamming pods have been uled in December of this year. The Air Force plans to buy 24 ASIP
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
the Air Force’s preferred solution, but its first at- systems for the Global Hawk.
tempt at starting a program was cancelled in 2005 On April 24, the Air Force issued a pre-solicitation notice an-
because its projected cost was unaffordable. The nouncing its intention to award Northrop Grumman Mission Systems
subsequent B-52 CCJ proposal featured stripped- a sole-source contract to develop scaled-down versions of ASIP, called
down requirements and a halved price tag. Last ASIP 1C and 2C, respectively, for its MQ-1 Predator and larger MQ-9
October, an AEA briefing to the DAWG by a PA&E Reaper (Predator B) UAVs.– G. Goodman
official that supported the B-52 CCJ plan was tor-
pedoed unexpectedly by the then-vice chief of
naval operations, ADM Robert Willard. As a result,
the DAWG directed PA&E to reexamine the SOJ SIGINT AIRCRAFT DO YEOMAN’S WORK
requirement and to report back in the spring. In testimony before the House Armed Services Air and Land Forces
A summit of the Navy and Air Force chiefs, Subcommittee April 19, Air Force and Navy flag officers touted the criti-
which will include discussions of each service’s cal roles being played by their respective signals intelligence (SIGINT)
contribution to meeting the DOD’s AEA require- aircraft. Lt Gen David Deptula, the Air Force’s first deputy chief of staff
ments, was scheduled in late April but has been for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, noted that his ser-
put off indefinitely. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen vice’s RC-135 Rivet Joint aircraft are operating at “above max surge”
Michael Moseley plans to ask Chief of Naval Op- levels and require a sustained investment to keep their sophisticated
erations ADM Mike Mullen for his interim help capabilities effective in the global war on terrorism (GWOT).
in meeting expeditionary AEA re- quirements “Spiral modernization of the Rivet Joint SIGINT fleet is necessary,”
post-2012 with the new EA-18G Growlers he said, “to keep pace with the wide-ranging and continu-
until the B-52 CCJ can be fielded in FY15 or ously evolving threat, particu- larly in light of advancements
FY16. – G. Goodman in commercially available per-
sonal communication systems.”
He said the spiral mod-
ernization will entail a
series of incremental base-
continued on page 18
IT COULD BE REAL.
326497
Electtronica
4/c
pg 17
When you can’t see something, it doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist.
It may simply have a huge strategic advantage.
DESIGN AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC DEFENCE SYSTEMS.
t h e m o n i t o r | n e ws
continued from page 16
line upgrades, which will ensure that the RC-135 “does not require recapitalization AARGM CONTINUES LIVE-FIRE
until 2023 and, with relatively minor service-life extensions, will remain a viable FLIGHT TESTING
platform until 2040.” The US Navy’s Advanced Anti-
The Rivet Joint also will receive the Network-Centric Collaborative Targeting Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) sys-
(NCCT) capability, which links multiple intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance tem development and demonstration
(ISR) aircraft, such as RC-135s and U-2s. The platforms rapidly exchange and correlate (SDD) program, which began in June
disparate multi-INT sensor data “machine-to-machine” to pinpoint the locations of 2003 and has Italian air force partici-
enemy forces and emitters in seconds. Deptula said the Rivet Joint also is gaining a pation, was set to begin live-fire flight
reachback capability, which allows it to send a portion of its collected signals intel- tests from F/A-18C/D fighters as this is-
ligence to ground-based worldwide analysts who can help process the data. sue went to press in late May.
Rear ADM Bruce Clingan, deputy chief of naval operations for air warfare, told AARGM reuses the warhead, wings,
the subcommittee that the Navy’s EP-3E Aries II SIGINT aircraft has flown more than fins and rocket motor of the current
8,000 mission hours in support of maritime component commander and regional Navy-Air Force AGM-88 High-Speed
combatant commander GWOT missions worldwide. The joint Army-Navy Aerial Com- Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM) and
mon Sensor (ACS) development program was slated to provide an EP-3E replacement adds a new multi-mode guidance seek-
for the Navy, but the two services went their separate ways two months ago. Clin- er section, a GPS/Inertial Navigation
gan revealed that a DOD-directed joint ISR study, completed prior to the Army-Navy System and other improvements. The
split, had “reexamined the multi-INT requirements that were the core of the ACS new missile is designed to improve le-
program, and considered potential manned and unmanned solutions. [It] validated thal suppression of enemy air defenses
the need for a manned, multi-INT platform to meet the tactical commander’s direct- (SEAD), particularly those that shut off
support ISR needs and highlighted the specific attributes required to be effective their radars to foil HARM’s ability to
in this regard.” passively home in on radar emissions.
The Navy is fully committed to sustaining the EP-3E airframe and keeping its AARGM is scheduled to enter low-rate
mission systems effective until its replacement, now called the EPX, is fielded, initial production by ATK Missile Sys-
Clingan said. The service plans three spiral upgrades to the mission system and in- tems in the third quarter of FY08 and
stallation of Special Structural Inspection Kits, which will carry the EP-3E through to achieve an initial operational capa-
2019. – K. Chaisson bility in late FY09. Production of 1,750
18
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
modified missiles for the Navy and Air onstration, as well as three Quick Bolt JED WELCOMES NEW
Force is planned. Advanced Concept Technology Demon- ASSISTANT EDITOR
The new seeker section has a more stration firings. Seven live firings of Marianne Kunkel has joined JED
sensitive digital anti-radiation homing engineering development model (EDM) as an assistant editor. She recently
(ARH) receiver and an active millime- missiles will occur in FY07, and an Op- received her master’s degree in Eng-
ter-wave (MMW) radar, which is used erational Assessment with two more lish from the University of Florida in
after launch for terminal guidance live EDM firings employing realistic Gainesville and has served as an edi-
when a radar shuts down. The GPS/INS operational scenarios is slated in early torial intern for the University Press
is added to the HARM control section. 2008. An independent Operational Eval- of Florida, and as both a writer and
Navy CAPT Larry Egbert, program man- uation with 11 firings of production- editor for the magazine Gainesville To-
are being layered on top of the SLQ-32’s do for SEWIP Block 2 is essentially go- IN BRIEF
1970s-vintage RF technology. (Block 2 ing to be the same technology that will Northrop Grumman Integrated
improvements are expected to include go on those ship classes, with the pos- Systems (El Segundo, CA) said May 16
a major receiver upgrade to improve sible exception of the Littoral Combat that it had delivered the center/aft fu-
system sensitivity and provide precise Ship.” He said his office has been work- selage section for the first production-
measurement of threat signal angle ing with the future ship program man- configured development model of the
of arrival, according to a Navy budget agers to define their EW requirements Boeing EA-18G Growler. The EA-18G is
document.) based on their ship’s planned missions. an airborne electronic attack (AEA) de-
The Block 2 plan also will outline A future SEWIP Block 3 phase will sig- rivative of the US Navy’s new two-seat
the way ahead in EW for future ship nificantly improve the electronic at- F/A-18F Super Hornet and will begin
classes, including the planned DDG- tack capabilities of the SLQ-32, while replacing the service’s EA-6B Prowler
1000 Zumwalt-class guided-missile de- Block 4 envisions adding an infrared jamming aircraft in 2009. Northrop
stroyer, Small said, adding, “What we jamming capability. – G. Goodman Grumman previously delivered that sec-
tion for two Growler flight test aircraft,
and the latest delivery is the first of
four under the system development and
demonstration phase of the program.
The Navy’s current plan is to buy a to-
tal of 84 EA-18Gs. Northrop Grumman
(Bethpage, NY) is the Growler’s AEA
system integrator.
✪ ✪ ✪
327672
EWA
1/2h
pg 22
✪ ✪ ✪
✪ ✪ ✪
✪ ✪ ✪ pg 23
Raytheon Electronic Warfare (Goleta, CA) received a Naval
Air Systems Command contract May 2 that marked the first in-
ternational sale of its state-of-the-art ALR-67(V)3 digital radar
warning receiver (RWR). The contract includes 24 systems for
the Navy and 55 for the Royal Australian Air Force. The ALR-
67(V)3 is used on new Navy carrier-based F/A-18E/F fighters
and will now be installed on RAAF F/A-18A+ aircraft as part
of Australia’s Hornet Upgrade program. Deliveries under the
contract will begin in October 2008 and be completed by March
2010. (The RAAF also has ordered 24 F/A-18F fighters that will
come equipped with the ALR-67(V)3.) The contract represents
the ninth full-rate production lot awarded to Raytheon; more
than 400 of the RWRs plus spares have been ordered.
✪ ✪ ✪
for upgrading the P-3C aircraft’s mission jammed by the aircraft’s ALQ-99 system. sole-source IDIQ contract on July 23 to
avionics. The test took place on the Atlantic Test L-3 Communications’ Titan Systems
Range near the Naval Air Warfare Center, (Mount Laurel, NJ) for engineering,
✪ ✪ ✪ Patuxent River, MD. ARINC and its sub- technical and programmatic support
contractor, Porter Technical, developed services for maintaining and updating
ARINC (Annapolis, MD) said May 1 test procedures, drafted the flight and simulations and intelligence databases
that a team of its engineers had played a directed the flight test for the Navy. for the Airborne Electronic Attack/EA-
key role in the Navy’s first live electronic 6B Prowler Integrated Product Team
attack mission of a Boeing EA-18G devel- ✪ ✪ ✪ located at the Naval Air Warfare Center
opment aircraft in January. The Growler’s Weapons Division at Point Mugu, CA.
ALQ-218 receiver successfully detect- The Naval Air Warfare Center Weap-
ed, identified and located a simulated ons Division at China Lake, CA, said May ✪ ✪ ✪
threat emitter, which was subsequently 2 that it intends to award a two-year
LaBarge (St. Louis, MO) said May 2
that it had received contracts valued at
$2 million from BAE Systems (Nashua,
NH) to produce ruggedized circuit card
assemblies for the AN/AAR-57 Common
Missile Warning System. The CMWS,
deployed on a variety of Army, Navy,
Marine Corps and Air Force aircraft, de-
Because tomorrow’s fends military helicopters and transport
platforms… and tactical aircraft from heat-seeking
missiles by detecting and warning crews
of missile threats and cuing counter-
measures. The electronic assemblies,
built by LaBarge in Tulsa, function in
24 the CMWS’ electro-optic missile sensors
and in its electronic control unit (ECU),
which processes data from the sensors
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
pg 25
of an updated processor for the ALQ-213 Georgia Tech saw $8 million more for ad- tal focused on the development of a stra-
EW Management System. The upgrade vanced SAM hardware simulator develop- tegic plan for JIEDDO, and it directed the
program had received no funding in the ment; $5 million extra was allotted for DOD to finalize the JIEDDO strategic plan
initial bill. tactical SIGINT technology development, no later than August 17, 2007. The Senate
Air Force SIGINT programs also emerged while development of advanced pack- also directed JIEDDO to provide a staff-
with mixed results. The HASC allotted aging and direction finding for JTWS ing report to the congressional defense
$6 million for research and development netted an additional $2.3 million. The committees by May 18, 2007.
(R&D) to continue growth of the Rivet PATENT HAMMER next-gen SIGINT sensor A report by House-Senate confer-
Joint Network Interface Program, which received an extra $1 million in devel- ence members that accompanied the
supports in-theater network geolocation opment funds. – E. Richardson subsequent compromise supplemen-
collaboration. And the C-130 Senior Scout tal contained even stronger language.
program received an additional $7 million CONGRESS WANTS The lawmakers said they “remain con-
for production of a fourth roll-on/roll-off BETTER RESULTS FROM cerned with the organization’s finan-
shelter for the SIGINT aircraft. In its bud- COUNTER-IED FUNDING cial management practices, including
get submission, the DOD had requested The Defense Department’s its continued failure to provide a plan
$3.9 million to upgrade the three existing Joint Improvised Explosive De- for obligation and expenditures for pre-
Senior Scout shelters. vice Defeat Organization (JIEDDO) viously approved and for currently re-
However, the committee cut $10.9 was the target of criticism from quested funding,” and believe that the
million from the Airborne Signals Intel- Congress for the first time in the JIEDDO “is not effectively managing its
ligence Enterprise – specifically for the House and Senate versions of the resources to deliver effective counter-IED
Global Hawk Unmanned Aerial System FY2007 wartime supple- solutions to theater.” The report warned
– indicating the amount duplicated fund- mental funding bill that that without changes, the program may
ing requested elsewhere. was vetoed by Presi- not receive full funding. – G. Goodman
323055
L-3 Electron Devices
4/c
pg 27
world
repor t
THALES CAPTURES UK SUB WORK IN BRIEF
The UK Royal Navy has awarded a £21 mil- m Australia’s Department of Defence awarded BAE Systems Australia a
lion contract to Thales UK (Crawley, Sussex) to $76.1 million contract on May 14 to supply an upgraded electronic sup-
upgrade the radar ESM systems for its Trafal- port measures (ESM) system for the nation’s AP-3C Orion maritime patrol
gar-, Vanguard- and Astute-class submarines. aircraft. The contract requires BAE Systems to replace existing sub-
Awarded as part of the Submarine Ad- systems and associated ground support systems. The upgraded system
vanced RESM Technology (SMART) program, will enter service in 2011. The ESM contract is part of a series of AP-3C
the contract calls for the company to update upgrades worth up to $600 million that are anticipated over the next
the submarines’ existing ESM systems with an seven years.
open architecture and digital receivers. The
SMART system leverages MINERVA and PALAN- m New Zealand’s Cabinet on May 2 approved awarding L-3 Communica-
TIR signal processing used on the Navy’s Type tions SPAR Aerospace (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) a $21.2 million con-
45 frigate ESM systems. tract to design, integrate and install a new EW self-protection system on
The Royal Navy operates seven Trafalgar- the Royal New Zealand Air Force’s (RNZAF’s) five C-130 aircraft. The con-
class nuclear attack subs, which entered ser- tract is an add-on to the six-year Life Extension Program for the C-130s
vice in the 1980s; four Vanguard-class ballistic awarded to L-3 SPAR in December 2004 by the New Zealand Ministry of
missile subs; and it is building four Astute- Defence, which entails comprehensive avionics, mechanical and struc-
class nuclear attack submarines. The program tural refurbishment. SPAR previously installed the same self-protection
28 will help to establish radar ESM commonality suite on Canada’s C-130s. In 1998, the Three of New Zealand’s C-130s were
across the Royal Navy’s submarine fleet and equipped with a self-protection capability comprising a radar warning
provide greater interoperability with surface receiver, a missile warning system and a countermeasures dispenser.
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
ships, like the Type 45. But improved self-protection is deemed essential due to the increasing
In other company news, Thales France has sophistication and availability of ground-based anti-aircraft missiles in
won a contract to retrofit new radar ESM on locations such as Afghanistan. SPAR’s system also will be fitted on New
the French Navy’s six Rubis-class nuclear at- Zealand’s new NH90 helicopters.
tack submarines. – J. Knowles
m The Indian Navy is installing indigenous electronic warfare systems on
its surface ships and other platforms as part of a modernization drive,
TERMA TO EQUIP DUTCH CHINOOKS india-defense.com reported last month. The new Sangraha EW system
The Royal Netherlands Air Force has tapped was jointly developed by the Indian Navy and DRDO’s Electronics Re-
TERMA (Lystrup, Denmark) to supply EW sys- search Laboratory. It comprises a family of electronic support measures
tems for its Chinook helicopters. Under the (ESM) suites for different platforms that can detect and classify emis-
Chinook Aircraft Survivability Equipment sions from pulsed, continuous-wave, PRF-agile, frequency-agile and
(CHASE) program, the company will deliver a chirp radars. The system’s modularity facilitates deployment on a broad
variant of the Apache Modular Aircraft Surviv- array of platforms, including small ships and helicopters. Certain San-
ability Equipment (AMASE) pods installed on graha-fitted platforms also have electronic countermeasures capabili-
the stub wings of the RNLAF’s Apache helos. ties, employing multiple-beam phased-array jammers for simultaneous
The CHASE suite will comprise the AAR- handling of multiple threats.
54 missile warning system from Northrop
Grumman, the AAQ-24 Directional IR Coun- m Singapore announced that it has decided to replace its four US E-2C
termeasures (DIRCM) system from Northrop Hawkeye airborne early-warning aircraft by 2010 with US Gulfstream
Grumman and Selex, a chaff and flare dis- 550 long-range twin-engine business jets equipped with the Phalcon
penser, and Terma’s ALQ-213(V) EW Manage- phased-array radar system and other Israeli-made electronics. Singa-
ment System. The components of the CHASE pore will receive its first Gulfstream 550 later this year. The Israeli air
suite were evaluated during flight tests ear- force last year fielded its first similar Gulfstream 500 jet equipped with
lier this year at the country’s Vliehors range. the Phalcon conformal radar and signals-intelligence equipment. It also
– J. Knowles has six older Boeing 707 Phalcon aircraft. a
324344
EDO Recon & Surveillance
Systems
4/c
pg 29
interview
GÉR A RD CHRIST MANN,
G ENER A L M A N AGER OF ELECT RONIC CO MBAT
SOLU TIONS, THALES AEROSPACE
When he was named to head Thales’ RF EW business line in early 2005, Gérard Christmann had already garnered decades of experience
in EW, missile and communications programs within the company. After graduating from the Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Télécom-
munications (SUP TELECOM) in Paris, he joined the Telecomunication Division of Thomson-CSF in 1975 as a technical engineer. He was
appointed director of the division’s EW department and then promoted to marketing and sales director of the division. In 1993, he was
appointed Vice President of Thomson-CSF’s International Department. He then joined the company’s Detection and Missile Systems Group
as director of the medium-range missile systems business. In 2000, he became Director of the Missile Electronics Business Unit within
Thales Airborne Systems before being named Director of Electronic Combat Solutions, within the newly formed Thales Aerospace division.
In the month before the Paris Air Show, JED Editor John Knowles interviewed Christmann for his unique perspective on the EW market.
pg 31
int e r v iew | Gérard Christmann
continued from page 30
ELINT systems is named VIGILE. VIGILE was co-developed be- to organize European cooperation, and we expect to be able
tween France and UK. When there is no security issue, we can to launch something – an actual program – in the following
offer products such as these. years. This is based not only on technologies demonstrated
under CARBONE, but on those technology demonstration proj-
What are some of the EW projects that Thales is working on ects that were contracted to us after CARBONE. The French Air
right now? Force is very interested in obtaining a support jammer. The
As I mentioned, we are developing a new system for the operational requirement is clear, and we expect the program to
FREMM. In the UK, we have just won a contract for the ret- begin in France within the next few years.
rofit of radar ESM [Submarine Advanced Radar ESM Technol-
ogy – SMART] on the Royal Navy’s submarines. This contract Would other nations become involved in the cooperative
is important for us and represents confirmation from the UK development of a support jammer or would you be looking
MoD, in the face of open competition from the world’s major to develop this strictly within France?
EW suppliers, of Thales’ position as the predominant naval EW It would be a European collaborative program. It could
supplier in Europe. There will also be a competition within the be developed and bought between two or three European air
next three years for the replacement of the electronic warfare forces.
systems on all of the surface ships of the British Royal Navy.
And, we have developed the VIGILE family for export oppor- What are some of the new product areas that Thales is
tunities such as Greece, Indonesia, Malaysia, Oman, Qatar and pursuing in the EW market?
so on. For combat aircraft, we don’t have a generic system to UAVs are a new requirement we are following, mainly for
offer. payloads – SIGINT payloads. And there is a need to protect
them. So, for instance, we are looking into development of
How is Thales approaching the airborne EW market? small jammers. We are also developing for France the payloads
In France, we provide the self-protection systems for Mirage for the ELISA [Electronic Intelligence Satellite]. It is a black
2000 and Rafale aircraft. But we are not “the” supplier for the program. Of course, this is not for the export market.
British platforms. For the export market, we have developed
32 CATS [Compact Airborne Threat Surveyor]. The first CATS sys- At the technology and component level, do you feel that
tems were made for slow-moving aircraft like transports, he- Thales is very competitive with the other top companies in
licopters and UAVs. We are now offering a version for fighter the market?
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
aircraft. For the retrofit market, we have developed a podded Yes. It is not possible to be competitive if you do not have
jammer PAJ. It is very small – say close to the size of an infra- the right technology. And part of our main activity is to
red missile – and it can fit easily on many different fighters. In integrate the components more and more, to be able to put
addition to CATS and PAJ, we have integrated suites for more more functions in the same size and to lower the price for the
advanced aircraft. The best example is the EW suite for the equipment.
Mirage 2000-9. The customer wanted something very similar or
better than the F16 Block 60. On what areas does Thales focus its research and
development dollars these days? Do you focus more on the
Within the radar technology area, are you looking at AESA software expertise or in the component technology?
radars that can perform EW functions? Both. Of course, we feel that the performance is linked to
Absolutely. In fact, for the active radar we have developed the technology – the receiver and so on. But more and more,
a European technology within a European company, which is the performance is also linked to the algorithms that run the
UMS [United Monolithic Semiconductors]. UMS is a joint ven- EW systems. And as you know, increasingly the performance
ture between Thales and EADS, and we have developed the of a self-protection system onboard an aircraft is the result of
technologies to provide an RF system that be perform radar data fusion between different sensors.
functions, as well as ESM and jamming. So we have developed
the right knowledge and have a European source for the tech- As a final question, what is the strategic objective of your
nology, so we are not dependent on the US. Some AESA proto- EW business in the near future?
types are already flying, and this type of technology is going We represent the merger of Thomson-CSF and RACAL and
to be used on the French RAFALE. Dassault Electronique, and our target is clearly to take advan-
tage of our experience in the EW market. Our goal is to main-
Is Thales developing a support jamming system? In the past tain our market share and, if possible, to increase our market
there has been a project CARBONE. share. We are in a very strong position in the market. And
CARBONE was started by the Air Force to enable the devel- our goal is to take advantage of that position and to continue
opment of a support jammer. An arrangement has been made building on it. a
Threat ID
Immediately
311220
Wide Band Systems
4/c
pg 33
European
After a period of market
correction, European
companies have
reorganized, reformed
and emerged stronger
than before. JED takes a
look at these companies
and the European
EW programs they’re
supporting.
By Gábor Zord
EW
I
35
In last year’s July issue, JED assessed the state of Eu- The Euro Hawk program reached a milestone in Feb-
ropean EW. After a decade of intense consolidation, ruary when EADS and Northrop Grumman (together Eu-
Europe’s EW industry has reshaped itself to be more roHawk GmbH) signed a €430 million contract for the
competitive within Europe and abroad. The interna- development, test and support of this high-altitude UAV
tional makeup of EW companies, such as Saab Avitron- system. The platform itself is a derivative of the lat-
ics, Selex, Thales and EADS, also has helped perpetuate est RQ-4 Block 20 aircraft. However, it will be equipped
cooperation among European governments on many EW with an indigenous, EADS-developed SIGINT payload
programs. The result is a stronger European EW industry capable of performing standoff ELINT and COMINT. The
that can support the needs of its domestic customers European consortium, which integrates all relevant EW
and effectively compete in international programs. This capabilities under the roof of EADS Defence Electronics,
month, JED is taking a look at “who’s who” in European also will provide ground stations that will receive and
EW – European companies and the European EW pro- analyze the “take” from the aircraft.
grams they are supporting. According to the contract, the first demonstrator is
slated for delivery in 2010, and four additional platforms
Euro Hawk will be delivered by 2014. The Euro Hawk will replace
Not counting the French ESSAIM SIGINT satellite 1970s-vintage German Navy Br. 1150 Atlantique SIGINT
constellation launched together with the Helios 2A IM- aircraft, which have become increasingly difficult to
INT satellite, the German Euro Hawk program is Europe’s support due to Germany’s replacement of Atlantique
most significant SIGINT program because of its strategic MPAs with ex-Netherlands Navy Orions last year. Ste-
importance. It’s a step in the right direction to make fan Zoller, a member of the EADS Executive Committee
the common European Security and Defence Policy for Defence & Security Systems, welcomes the program,
(ESDP) possible and relevant in the future. saying it enables the Luftwaffe to assume control of its
continued on page 38
the power
ELECTRONIC WARFARE
RADAR SYSTEMS
SATELLITE
COMMUNICATION
Cobham 313212
Cobham Defence Electronics
4/c
COMMERCIAL
AVIATION
Defense
SMART MUNITIONS
AND MISSILES
pg 36 HOMELAND SECURITY
SEARCH AND
Systems...
SURVEILLANCE
OVERHAUL AND
REPAIR
Positioners for RF & Positioning Systems Ground Based Platform and Soldier Slotted Arrays Waveguide Assembl
Microwave Applications for EO Applications Antennas Combat Management
Systems
ATLANTIC MICROWAVE www.atlanticmicrowave.com 978-779-6963 ATLANTIC POSITIONING SYSTEMS www.atlanticpo
CONTINENTAL MICROWAVE www.contmicro.com 603.775.5200 KEVLIN www.kevlin.com 978-557-2400 NURAD www.nurad.com
of integration
the whole is far greater
than the sum of its parts
313212
Cobham Defence Electronics
4/c
pg 37
lies Rotary Joints Airborne Antennas Filters Control Components Integrated Microwave MMIC
Assemblies
ositioners.com 727-299-0150 COBHAM DEFENSE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. www.cobhamdcweb.com +44 0 1254 292020
410-542-1700 REMEC DEFENSE & SPACE www.remecrds.com 858.560.1301 SIVERS LAB AB www.siverslab.se +46 8 477 6811
continued from page 35
intelligence activities, and shows how moved forward during the last year as the newest technology to cover both
the Bundeswehr is transforming and ac- subassemblies from different produc- symmetrical and asymmetrical threats.
quiring network-enhanced capabilities. tion sites across the continent (wings Of the planned 180-aircraft production
Before its approval by the German – Filton, UK; fuselage – Breben, Ger- run, 85 will be outfitted with a Defensive
Budget Committee, the system under- many; nose – Saint Nazaire, France) Aids Subsystem (DASS), which includes
went an intensive evaluation in 2003, came together in Seville, Spain, where the Multicolor Infrared Alerting Sen-
which included six successful test flights the production line and test facility are sor (MIRAS), a two-color missile launch
of a Global Hawk at the Nordholz Naval located. Airbus recently dispelled ru- warning system from EADS and Thales.
Air Station, carrying an “ELINT-type sen- mors of a half-year flight delay that had The two-color infrared technology will
sor” for wide area surveillance missions. leaked from a contractor, and the first enable the MIRAS to detect long range
flight is expected next year. air-to-air and shorter range SAM threats
A400M According to Lothar Belz, EADS senior with a very low false alarm rate.
The European transport aircraft has media manager, the A400M will receive The ALR-400 radar warner, co-pro-
duced by Indra and EADS, has a perfor-
mance more similar to an ESM system
,OWER THE 2ISK than that of a simple RWR, according
to Belz. Its MBDA Expendable Dispenser
System is specifically designed for the
A400M and can fire a wide variety of
payloads, including Modular Expendable
Blocks (MEBs). This technology enhanc-
es protection by increasing the effective
payload in the dispensers. Moreover, the
design of the DASS computer (DAC) in-
corporates data fusion using both on-
board sensors and external data sources
to provide the crew with full situational
38 awareness. According to EADS, growth
potential includes a directed infra-
red countermeasures system (DIRCM),
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
SAAB AVITRONICS
www.saabgroup.com
Rafale
The French government’s Rafale program reached an impor-
tant milestone this past March, when the aircraft underwent
its “baptism of fire” over Afghanistan. Although Rafales saw
this theatre in 2002, during the early stages of the coalition
operations, the basic F1 standard Marine aircraft only per-
formed combat air patrol missions and did not provide close
air support (CAS) for ground forces. This time, the air force’s 317588
1/7 squadron, based in Provence, deployed to Tajikistan with
three F2 standard aircraft cleared to carry typical stores: GBU-
Crane Aerospace & Electronics
12 and -22 laser guided bombs. Operating simultaneously on 1/2lv 41
the Arabian Sea, the air wings of carrier Charles de Gaulle re-
ceived three F2 Marine versions, complementing nine F1s al-
ready deployed. pg 41
Besides modern RF detection and jamming modules, which
employ interferometric AOA techniques with an accuracy of
1 degree and have phased array active antennas that provide
compatible narrow beamwidth, the Spectra system from Thales
and MBDA also comprises optronic and laser warners. The DAL
(French for LWR) has three sensors that provide 360 azimuth
and 90 degrees elevation coverage against laser range find-
ers, designators and beam-riders. The DMM (French for missile
launch warner) is a dual-color sensor mounted on the top of a
fin, providing 360 degree azimuth cov-
erage. The DDM-NG
(French for new gen-
eration) is already in
production for new
F3 standard aircraft
and retrofits from
2008 to prevent parts of
the original DDM from becom-
ing obsolete. The DDM-NG also will pro-
vide new capabilities, like full-sphere
detection and high angular resolu-
tion, which are compliant with future
DIRCM installation.
Editorial AD
AUVSI JED sa ying…
ar e
1/2v e es
nd “ All the leading
companies in
e
att
unmanned systems
pg 42 were present.”
August 6-9, 2007
h at
“ Good variety of attendees
w
and exhibitors.”
Washington Convention Center • Washington, DC, USA
Here’s
“ There were so many different
nations represented.”
More exhibition space More exhibitors More visitors
■ Over 230,000 gross square feet ■ 265 exhibitors ■ Over 4,000 visitors “ Great event…best ever for
the industry.”
(over 70,000 square meters) in 2006 expected in 2007
“ Very good opportunity to
develop new teaming
opportunities and
review new products.”
For more information, please call +1 703 845 9671 or visit www.auvsi.org
42
AUVSI.indd 1 5/22/07 5:40:04 PM
manufacture of:
Microwave Amplifiers & Transmitters
Ultra Compact MPMs
High Voltage Power Supplies
327678
TMD Technologies
1/2h
Winner of two UK Queen’s
pg 42 Awards for Enterprise:
2004 International Trade
2005 Innovation
For EW Applications; Airborne,
Naval & Ground Based
TMD Technologies Ltd
Swallowfield Way Hayes Middlesex UB3 1DQ UK
TMD 44 (0)20 8573 5555
…the power in microwaves! www.tmd.co.uk
CONFERENCE
When: Friday, August 10 Clearance: Secret, U.S. Only
Conference Chair: Dyke Weatherington, Deputy,
Where: Washington, DC Unmanned Aircraft Planning Task Force, OUSD (AT&L)
Air Warfare
Keynote Address: The Honorable Claude M. Bolton,
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics
Editorial and
ADTechnology) (invited)
UAV Payloads
Don’t miss this one-day, OSD-led, SECRET/U.S-only
UAS Payloads Conference! Expect in-depth
1/2v insight into current UAS payload
performance in support
of Operations
pg 44
Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom,
noted shortfalls and future National-
level UAS payload requirements.
This conference is presented by AOC in
cooperation with the AUVSI’s Unmanned Systems North
America Symposium and Exhibition.
Visit www.crows.org for more information about the
conference agenda and to register.
What is your organization’s charter? that doesn’t offer upward mobility and
Our EW Division is the Army’s career progression. It’s looking very
central focal point for coordinating promising for the final development
and synchronizing all things involv- of that MOS. We also expect to have a
ing EW. Our job is to formulate EW more in-depth training school for non-
policy, validate and prioritize EW commissioned officers in place by the
requirements, allocate resources and end of this year.
integrate EW missions, functions We also want to leverage more of
46 and materiel solutions. The rest of the existing joint EW courses and EW-
our charter is to fulfill the vision of related competencies within the other
the chief of staff and the vice chief services. One of our directives from
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
to make EW something every soldier the vice chief is to keep our EW efforts
– from initial-entry privates all the joint. The Army realizes that EW is not
way up to senior officers – is familiar something it does on its own; like most
with. They all will eventually receive missions today, we are closely tied to
some level of EW training. the joint services. So we want to capi-
talize on their EW training and educa-
What were some of your EW tion, materiel and operations so we all
Division’s accomplishments during its first year? can work together in a seamless joint EW environment.
One of the major things we’ve done is establish training
for Army EWOs to perform ground EW missions. With the help GEN Cody directed that you operationalize Army EW as a
of Army Training and Doctrine Command [TRADOC], we estab- form of “fires.” Why is this the right place to put it?
lished training courses for Army EWOs. We currently have a For decades, EW has largely been hidden from the opera-
three-week tactical course at Fort Huachuca, AZ, for EWOs at tional warfighting Army, whose soldiers are out there deliver-
battalion level and below, and a six-week operational course at ing lethal effects on the enemy. They haven’t known much
Fort Sill, OK, for EWOs at the brigade level and higher. about EW because it has been hidden in security classifications
Leader training is significant and a big pillar we have to where the primary warfighters can’t necessarily access it, so
achieve. In order to really use the EWOs in the right way, lead- EW has been very mysterious to them. I believe what the vice
ers need to understand the value they bring to the organiza- chief wants to do is to demystify it and put EW in the hands
tion and the fact that they have to be smart, highly motivated of the combat warfighters – the commanders of brigade combat
and trusted individuals. We are working on developing a func- teams and divisions – so they can understand what effects EW
tional area qualification course so that officers and warrant can provide non-kinetically and sometimes non-lethally, and
officers can get a more intense, more in-depth, longer period thus [EW] might be more effective and less risky than using
of EW training. TRADOC is working on establishing an MOS kinetic weapons systems in some situations. That’s a big sea
[military occupational specialty] for enlisted personnel. That change for Army EW because we’ve run it largely as an intel-
takes time to develop all the job tasks and to do the analysis ligence-based operation for so long. EW will provide a new set
that goes into it. What we don’t want to do is build an MOS of capabilities in the maneuver commander’s tool kit.
int e r v iew | COL Laurie Moe Buckhout
What is the role of the Army Proponent for EW in TRADOC’s partment of the Army and joint-services level. On the bat-
Combined Arms Center [CAC] at Fort Leavenworth, KS? tlefield, however, military intelligence still plays a very
That office builds the Army’s EW requirements and assesses large role in EW in terms of performing electronic recon-
them. It also is responsible for developing EW DOTMLPF [doc- naissance and surveillance to find targets, and has power-
trine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and educa- ful capabilities that we’re going to leverage. The integrator
tion, personnel and facilities] solutions for ground EW. [It is] for all those capabilities on the battlefield is really going
building our new EW force structure, including the EWO billets to be the fire support coordinator, who understands the
at different levels with personnel of different ranks, from bat- targeting process and the integration of fires, as well as
talion on up. [It is] doing the painstaking analysis and legwork their effects. Two Navy Captain EWOs in Iraq integrated
330366
ERA Corp
4/c
Passive Surveillance Range Management
Deployable ACCS Component (DAC).
pg 48 Improved Situational Awareness.
Passive ESM Tracker (PET). Broadband Detection. Precise Aircraft Identification. PRM. PAR.
www.erabeyondradar.com
Era is the pioneer and world leader in next generation surveillance and
flight tracking technology with more than 100 military, homeland security, and
air traffic control customers throughout the U.S., Canada, Europe, the Middle
East, Africa, South America, and Asia.
TECHNOLOGY SURVEY
SAMPLING OF RWR/ESM/ELINT RECEIVERS
By Ollie Holt
F
ollowing our March 2007 survey on anten- quency range than the typical RWR, and they serve a
nas, this month’s survey continues the pro- slightly different purpose. The ELINT receiver usually
EDO Reconnaissance and Surveillance Systems, Morgan Hill, CA; (408) 201-8000; www.edorss.com
ES 3701 Tactical Radar Phase DF / AutoHet 2-18 GHz * -65 dBm 60 dB 60 dB
ESM and Surveillance
System
AN/SLD 4 (V) 1 Tactical 14-bit, 2-18 GHz DIFM 2-18 GHz 50 MHz -65 dBmi 60 dB 60 dB
Radar ESM and
Surveillance System
selectable SHet BW
ELT/160 family IFM E to J & K wide open medium * medium
ELT/740 family IFM / SHet C to J wide open & high * high
2 selectable BW
ELT 888 family multiband SHet / DIG B to J many selectable very high * very high
SHet BW
Elisra Electronic Systems Ltd., Bene Beraq, Israel; +972 3 6175522; www.elisra.com
AES-210 IFM .5-18 GHz * * * *
NS-9003A-V2 IFM / DIG * * * * *
SPS-65V-5 DIG * * * * *
SPS-1000V-5 IFM .5-20 GHz * * * *
Era Corporation, Alexandria, VA; +1 (703) 914-1430 / +1 421 461 004 150; www.erabeyondradar.com
VERA-RL SHet / CHNLZ / IFM / DIG 1-18 GHz 250/20 MHz -81/85 dBm 80 dB 60 dB
VERA-UHF/SIF SHet / CHNLZ / IFM / DIG 380-1000 MHz 16/4 MHz -86/88 dBm 80 dB 60 dB
and 1090 MHz and 28 MHz and -86 dBm
SMR-5550i Low Cost SHet set-on 0.5-20 GHz 100 MHz -80 dBm 60 dB *
Microwave Receiver extnd to 40 GHz
SMR-5800 Extended SHet set-on 0.5-40 GHz 100 MHz 0.5-18 GHz, -97 dBm 60 dB *
Tuning Range 18-26.5 GHz, -95 dBm
Microwave Receiver 26.5-40 GHz, -94 dBm
TU-3840 Wideband SHet sweeping or set-on 0.5-20 GHz 500 MHz -101 dBm ≥90 dB *
Microwave Tuner extnd to 40 GHz
TU-6401 Microwave SHet 0.5-18 GHz 500 MHz -99 dBm >90 dB *
VME Tuner extnd to 40 GHz
DF CHNL PWR SIZE PLATFORM WEIGHT
Various config: AZ/EL Mono-Pulse scalable 6 to 24 90W (config dep) config dep air/grd/shp/sub 60-160lbs
Phase Interferometers to Phase/ (config dep)
Amplitude all TDOA capable
yes 8 * * shp *
51
Amplitude monopulse (4 to 8 antennas) * * 2 ATR air 46-71kg
Amplitude monopulse (4 to 8 antennas) * * n/a shp *
& TDOA
Amplitude monopulse (4 antennas) * * 1 ATR air 15-20kg
Amplitude monopulse (4 antennas) * * 2 ATR air 55kg
IFM * * * air/shp *
* * * * shp *
yes * * * air *
* * * * air *
CS-6070 IFM Receiver IFM 2-18 GHz 2-18 GHz Better than 65 dB 65 dB
52 - 90 dBm
typical
Wideband Digital Receiver DIG 1 GHz 500 MHz Better than 70 dB 55 dB min
- 90 dBm
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
typical
CS-5111/RC-5800 SHet 0.4-18 GHz 500 MHz @ 1GHz IF / Better than 80 dB 80 dB
VME Microwave Tuners 85 MHz @ 160 MHz IF - 90 dBm
typical
HES21 SHet / IFM / DIG 0.7-2, 2-18, 18-40 100 MHz SHet, 2-18 -68 dBmi, 70 dB 55 dB
GHz (SHet and IFM), GHz IFM / 500 MHz SHet and IFM /
2-18 GHz digital in 25 channels, digital -75 dBmi digital
Amplitude (growth to phase/time 4 270W dig rec: 3.7 x 11.3 x air 79 lbs
DF planned) 13 / proc: 7.6 x
4.8 x 13.5 / quad
rec 6.2 x 1.7 x 7
Amplitude phase and time 4 100W 4 radar rec: 1.72 air 42 lbs
x 6.7 x 7.5 / 1 sig proc:
5 x 7.63 x 14.6
Amplitude, time 1 285W max 3.5 x 8.5 x 21.5 air/grd/shp/sub 25 lbs max
Spinning DF/Monopulse/ 1-8 (config dep) <1.0 kW for rec rec sys: 10.5 (6U) x air/grd/shp <110kg
Scanning Amplitude sys / <0.5 kW for 19 x 24 / ELINT server:
ELINT server 1.75 (1U) x 19 x 24 or
3.5 (2U) x 19 x 24
Spinning DF/Monopulse/ 1-8 (config dep) <1.0 kW for rec rec sys: 10.5 (6U) x air/grd/shp <100kg
Scanning Amplitude sys / <0.5 kW for 19 x 24 / ELINT server: entire sys
ELINT server 1.75 (1U) x 19 x 24 or
3.5 (2U) x 19 x 24
n/a 1-4 (config dep) <1.0 kW for rec rec sys 1U (1.75”) h air/grd/shp <15kg
sys / <0.5 kW or 2U (3.5”) h x 19
for ELINT server x 20-22”
MODEL TYPE FREQ INST SENSE TDR INSTDR
54
TECHNOLOGY SURVEY
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
Amplitude only / Opt: Phase / multiple 144W Receiver Controller air 10kg
Time / Geolocation (basic config) Unit (RCU): 194 x 157 (basic config)
x 318 mm / Radar
Sensor Unit (RSU):
100 x 100 mm
Phase, time 2 (addtl opt) 600W (2 ch) 550 x 780 x 600 mm air/shp 50kg
Amplitude and Phase * * * shp 250kg
comparison DF
Amplitude and Phase * * compact air/grd/shp/sub 60kg (air) to
150kg (shp)
comparison DF
55
pg 57
book
rev iew
STORMJAMMERS:
The Extraordinary Story of
Electronic Warfare Operations
in the Gulf War
W
e Crows are familiar with the EC-130H Compass Call and its impressive ability to jam enemy com-
mand and control systems, and we know EC-130s have participated in every significant combat
operation US forces have been involved in for nearly two decades. Now, thanks to a book by
former Compass Call “crew dog” Robert Stanek, readers can ride along with Stanek and his Grey
Lady Compass Call crew during 32 combat missions from January to March 1991, during Opera-
tion Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm.
Based on the author’s daily diary, Stormjammers: The Extraordinary Story of Electronic Warfare Operations in
the Gulf War, published in 2006, allows the reader to experience the hours of boredom punctuated with moments
of terror that are typical of combat flying. Although the many of the stories
are somewhat repetitive, this is what Compass Call life is like, and
the book quickly becomes hard to put down. Even though the reader
58 can anticipate what a mission will be like, the tedium gives over to
an adrenalin rush of anticipation when things begin to happen. It is
impossible not to share the relief and pride of the individual crew mem-
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
bers when the attack missions they protect exit Iraq safely because the
Iraqi air defenses command and control nets were completely defeated
by Compass Call’s powerful, targeted jamming.
Stanek, whose Gulf experiences are given credit for launching his
successful career as an international writer, bookends his story by relat-
ing a gut-wrenching experience many of us can relate to, telling one’s
wife that you are off to war. He shares arriving in Turkey to temporary
quarters (old military classrooms) that “quickly began to smell like an
old sweat sock,” getting to the showers before the hot water runs out, as
well as the joy of finding out that the commissary got a shipment of real
steaks and trying to coordinate a mission to get there while they last.
Another side of the book lets the reader ride along when Stanek’s EC-
130H has two engines quit in the war zone, and just when bailing out
seems a certainty milking the hobbled airplane back to base only to have
to argue with the tower over who has the worse emergency, Grey Lady or
the aircraft critically low on fuel just ahead of it. There are also the mis-
sions when AWACS, the key to Compass Call’s protection, had to bug out
because of maintenance problems, and the entire crew gives a thumbs-up
to stay on station and continue their protective mission even though the
risk is much, much higher. Stanek also talks about what it is like to listen
in, from his unique radio-monitoring position, and hear the final screams of
the enemy as they are attacked by missions made possible by the Compass
Call. – Kernan Chaisson
Stormjammers, by Robert Stanek, is an RP Books Regent Press book published by Virtual Press, Inc., in 2006.
ISBN 1-57545-083-6.
Analog & Mixed-Signal ICs, Modules & Subsystems
Communications
Electronic Warfare
Part 1
By Dave Adamy
E
lectronic Warfare (EW) is mitter and receiver are generally (but antenna is called the effective radiated
the art and science of deny- not always) in the same location, with power (ERP) in dBm. Note that the use
ing an enemy the benefits transmitted signals reflecting from tar- of dBm units is not really correct; in fact
of the electromagnetic spec- gets. In communications systems, the the signal at this point is a power den-
trum while preserving those transmitter and receiver are in different sity, properly stated in μv/m. However,
benefits for friendly forces. locations. The purpose of communica- if we were to place a theoretical ideal
This, of course, means the whole spec- tion systems of all types is to take in- isotropic antenna next to the transmit
trum. In this series, we will be focusing formation from one location to another. antenna (ignoring the near field issue)
on part of the spectrum most commonly Thus, communication uses the “one- the output of that antenna would be
used for tactical communications. We way” communications link as shown in the signal strength in dBm. Using the
take tactical communication to be more Figure 1. artifice of this assumed ideal antenna
than military point-to-point radio com- The one-way link includes a trans- allows us to talk about signal strength
munication; it also includes command mitter, a receiver, transmit and receive through its whole link in dBm without
and data links between base stations antennas, and everything that happens converting units, and is thus commonly
60 and remote military assets, broadcast to the signal between those two anten- accepted practice. The EW 101 in the
transmissions to multiple receivers and nas. Figure 2 is a diagram that repre- January 2007 JED has the formulas to
remote detonation of weapons. sents the one-way link equation. The convert back and forth between signal
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
We will start with a brief review of abscissa of this diagram is not to scale; strength in dBm and field density in
radio propagation in VHF, UHF and low it merely shows what happens to the μv/m.
microwave bands. Then, we will cover level of a signal as it passes through the Between the transmit and receive
some principles and examples of elec- link. The ordinate is the signal strength antennas, the signal is attenuated by
tronic support (ES), electronic attack (in dBm) at each point in the link. The the propagation loss. We will talk about
(EA) and electronic protection (EP) in transmitted power is the input to the the various types of propagation loss in
those bands. transmit antenna. The antenna gain is detail starting next month.
shown as positive, although in practice The signal arriving at the receiving
One Way Link any antenna can have positive or nega- antenna does not have a commonly used
The most dramatic difference be- tive gain (in dB). It is important to add symbol, but we will call it PA for conve-
tween EW against radars and EW against that the gain shown here is the antenna nience in some of our later discussions.
communications is that radars typically gain in the direction of the receiving Because PA is outside the antenna, it
use two-way links – that is the trans- antenna. The output of the transmit should really be in μv/m, but using the
same ideal antenna artifice, we use the
units dBm. The receiving antenna gain
is shown as positive, although it can be
INPUT
either positive or negative (in dB) in real
XMTR
INFO world systems. The gain of the receiving
antenna shown here is the gain in the
direction of the transmitter.
OUTPUT
The output of the receiving antenna
RCVR INFO is the input to the receiver system in
dBm. We call it the received power (PR).
The one-way link equation gives PR in
Figure 1: A one-way communication link includes a transmitter, a receiver, two antennas and
everything that happens between those antennas. terms of the other link components. In
dB units, it is:
continued on page 62
> www.MegaPhase.com
2098 West Main Street, Stroudsburg, PA 18360-9526 | Phone (570) 424-8400 | Email: Warrior@MegaPhase.com
E W101
continued from page 60
XMTR
PROPAGATION RCVR PR = P T + GT – L + GR
PATH Where: PR = the received signal power
ERP in dBm
GT
P T = the transmitter output power in
Signal Strength (in dBm)
PT
dBm
GT = the transmit antenna gain in dB
L
L = the link loss from all causes in
dB
PR = the transmitter output power in
PR
dBm
In some literature, the link loss
GT
is dealt with as a “gain,” which is, of
PA course, negative (in dB). When this no-
tation is used, the “Propagation Gain” is
added in the formula rather than sub-
Figure 2: The one-way link equation calculates the received power as a function of all other link tracted. In the EW 101 columns, we will
elements. consistently refer to loss as a negative
number in dB, and therefore subtract
loss in link equations.
k
cept Lin In linear (i.e., non-dB) units, this
Inter formula is:
Gain Toward INTERCEPT PR = (P T GT GR) / L
Intercept Rcvr
RCVR The power terms are in Watts, kilo-
Gain Toward
Xmtr watts, etc – and must be in the same
units. The gains and losses are pure
62 XMTR (unitless) ratios. Because the link loss is
Gain Toward Gain Toward
Desired Rcvr Xmtr in the denominator, it is a ratio greater
than 1. In subsequent discussions, the
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
63
14disney cruise.indd 1 5/14/07 9:22:32 AM
VOL II
___________________
___________________
U.S. MEMBER
$28.00 each / NON-MEMBER $46.00
INT’L. MEMBER $31.00 each / NON-MEMBER $46.00
VOL III
$35.00 each / NON-MEMBER $49.00
____________________
____________________
____________________
INT’L. MEMBER $40.00 each / NON-MEMBER $54.00 ____________________
Editorial AD
Only 300 Volume one’s left. History
THREE VOLUME SET HISTORY BOOKS
1/2h(U.S. & CANADA)
$75.00 MEMBERS
$100.00 MEMBERS (ALL OTHER ADDRESSES)
____________________
____________________
$100.00 NON-MEMBERS (U.S. & CANADA) ____________________
$125.00 NON-MEMBERS (ALL OTHER ADDRESSES) ____________________
pg 63
PLEASE PAY BY CASH, CHECK, VISA, MASTERCARD OR AMERICAN EXPRESS, MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE
TO THE AOC. SHIPPING AND HANDLING ARE INCLUDED IN PRICES ABOVE. VIRGINIA RESIDENTS ADD
4.5% SALES TAX.
NAME_____________________________________________________________________________________
ADDRESS__________________________________________________________________________________
For further information, please see the detailed course outline available at www.crows.org
association news
Experience in non-profit organiza- 2nd Place: Nick Kinzer, Lakeview High School –
tions and understanding of Congres- $250 US Savings Bond
sional and Executive Branch operations Honorable Mention: Christopher Chochon, Lakeview High School –
are each a plus. Salary commensurate AOC Student Membership
with experience. Must be a US citizen Honorable Mention: Madison Grinnell, Brownell-Talbot School –
and eligible to hold a security clearance. AOC Student Membership
Resume and references should prefera- Honorable Mention: Tony Jacobsen, Laurel-Concord High School –
bly be e-mailed to vittoria@crows.org, AOC Student Membership
or can be mailed to: Association of Old
Crows, 1000 N. Payne St., Alexandria, VA JUNIOR HIGH DIVISION
22314. a Co-1st Place: Kara Einspahr, St. John Lutheran –
$100 US Savings Bond
Co-1st Place: Brett Sasse, Lourdes Central Catholic –
$100 US Savings Bond
rg
baccalaureate degree is in computer information systems and
. o
AARGM, live-fire flight tests ............................................ 18 MBDA, Expendable Dispenser System ................................ 38
AC-130, LAIRCM funding increase ..................................... 26 Mercury Computer Systems, Echotek ECV4-2 receiver.......... 56
Aerial Common Sensor, Army and Navy program cuts ......... 26 MQ-1 Predator ................................................................. 16
Aethercomm, power amplifier .......................................... 56 MQ-9 Reaper (Predator B) ................................................. 16
Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA) system of systems.......... 16 Network-Centric Collaborative
Airborne Signals Intelligence Payload (ASIP) flight tests ... 16 Targeting (NCCT) for RC-135 ......................................... 18
ALQ-213, additional budget funding for ............................ 26 Northrop Grumman, ASIP testing ..................................... 16
ARINC, EA-18G electronic attack mission .......................... 24 Northrop Grumman, DIRCM for CH-53E helicopters ............. 23
B-52 Core Component Jammer .......................................... 16 Northrop Grumman, EA-18G Growler fuselage delivery ....... 22
BAE Systems, ESM for Australian AP-3C Orion.................... 28 Northrop Grumman, SEWIP Block 1A subsystems ............... 21
CAPTOR Radar ................................................................. 39 Phalcon phased-array radar system for
Singapore Gulfstream 550s .......................................... 28
Chemring Countermeasures .............................................. 44
Raytheon, ALR-67(V)3 for US Navy and RAAF .................... 23
COL Laurie Buckhout, US Army ......................................... 47
Raytheon, MALD-J risk reduction contract........................ 23
Cross-Eye Jamming .......................................................... 14
Raytheon, SLQ-32 ............................................................ 20
Deputy Advisors Working Group (DAWG)............................ 16
EADS, AAR-60 ................................................................. 43 RC-135 Rivet Joint, need for fleet modernization ............... 16
EADS, Defensive Aids Subsystem (DASS) for A400M ........... 38 Rising Edge Technologies, data recorder ............................ 56
EADS, SIGINT payload for Euro Hawk................................. 35 RQ-4B Global Hawk Block 30 SIGINT variant ...................... 16
EDO Corp, ALR-95 ESM for Navy P-3C patrol aircraft............ 23 Saab Avitronics, EWS 39................................................... 40
70 Saab Microwave Systems, MIDAS ...................................... 41
Elettronica, EuroDASS ..................................................... 38
European EW industry ..................................................... 35 Saab Microwave Systems, NORA ........................................ 40
The Journal of Electronic Defense | June 2007
European Security and Defense Policy .............................. 35 SAEC SIGINT System ........................................................ 44
Force Protection Jammer ................................................. 44 Selex, EuroDASS .............................................................. 38
FREMM EW ...................................................................... 44 Stormjammers, book review .............................................. 58
General Dynamics, AN/SSX-1 Small Ship ESM ..................... 21 Surface Ship EW Improvement Program (SEWIP) ................ 20
General Dynamics, SEWIP integration ............................... 21 Terma, ALQ-213 EWMS ..................................................... 43
Gérard Christmann, Thales Aerospace ............................... 30 Terma, CHASE ................................................................. 28
Horizon Frigate EW.......................................................... 44 Thales and EADS, Multicolor Infrared
Alerting Sensor (MIRAS) ............................................. 38
House Armed Services Committee, FY2008 Defense
Authorization Bill ....................................................... 26 Thales, CARBONE ............................................................. 43
Indian Navy, Sangraha EW system .................................... 28 Thales, Spectra ............................................................... 41
Indra and EADS, ALR-400 radar warner ............................. 38 Thales, submarine ESM contracts ...................................... 28
Indra, EuroDASS .............................................................. 38 TWE, for Tigre ................................................................. 43
JIEDDO, Congressional criticism for................................... 26 US Air Force, sourcing for medium-
L-3 Communications, EA-6B Prowler support services ......... 24 and high-altitude UAVs ............................................... 20
pg 3/ibc
Electronic Warfare Systems
328400
Raytheon
4/c
pg 4/obc
Protecting the lives of warfighters — it’s the driving force behind all that we do at Raytheon. And our electronic warfare
systems have been doing it for over 50 years. From decoys and jammers, to radar warning receivers and new digital
technology, our comprehensive range of products enables today’s pilots to detect and defeat the threat. But what
separates us from the others is our commitment to program execution. We deliver combat-proven performance you
can count on, where you need it and when you need it. Because we’re just as serious about his successful mission as
we are about our own.
www.raytheon.com