costs-of-gastroenteritis-in-the-netherlands
costs-of-gastroenteritis-in-the-netherlands
costs-of-gastroenteritis-in-the-netherlands
W. E. V A N D E N B R A ND HO F 1*, G. A. D E W IT 2, M. A. S. D E WI T 1
1
A N D Y. T. H. P. V A N DU Y N HO V E N
1
Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment
(RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
2
Department for Health Services Research, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM),
Bilthoven, The Netherlands
SUMMARY
In order to target the most important cost components of gastroenteritis in The Netherlands
and to indicate which change of policy yields the largest decrease in costs, the cost of illness of
gastroenteritis and the number of Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) in the Dutch
population in 1999 were determined. The costs of gastroenteritis were estimated using data
mainly from a community-based cohort study. For calculating DALYs, data on the number of
deaths due to gastroenteritis were used from Statistics Netherlands. On average, the costs for
gastroenteritis were 77 Euro (E) per case. For all patients in The Netherlands, the costs were
estimated at E345 million (ranging between E252 and E531 million). Indirect costs made up 82 %
of this total. An estimate of costs for patients with campylobacter, salmonella or norovirus
infections was, in total, 10–17% of the costs of gastroenteritis. Gastroenteritis was associated
with a loss of approximately 67 000 DALYs.
been adopted as a basis for Dutch public health daily about specific gastrointestinal symptoms, bed
policy [6]. rest, absence from work or school (of the patient
or someone taking care of the patient), use of medi-
cation, and use of the health-care system (GP, out-
METHODS patient department, hospital, alternative treatment).
It was clearly stated that only medical care use,
Data sources
absence, or bed rest due to their gastroenteritis epi-
To calculate the cost of illness from the societal per- sode should be reported. All gastroenteritis cases
spective, we needed data on the total number of cases from the CB study who completed the medical diary
of gastroenteritis per age group, the volumes for use were included in the analyses for this study. Gastro-
of resources such as medication, health services and enteritis was defined as : three or more loose stools
the indirect costs, and the actual economic costs of in 24 h, or three or more times vomiting in 24 h, or
each of these items. With this, the average costs per diarrhoea with at least two additional symptoms,
case in a certain age group could be calculated and or vomiting with at least two additional symptoms.
subsequently multiplied by the total number of cases Additional symptoms could be abdominal pain,
in each age group in The Netherlands. Then, the total abdominal cramps, nausea, blood in stool, mucus in
absolute costs of gastroenteritis could be calculated stool, fever, diarrhoea or vomiting.
by summing costs over all age groups. To calculate Since all stool samples in the CB study were tested
DALYs, we needed age-specific data on the number for enteropathogens, with the test results available
of deaths of gastroenteritis patients, duration and to GPs, the frequency of requesting stool tests by the
severity of symptoms and the disability weight for GP could not be determined in this study. However,
gastroenteritis in The Netherlands. We needed the in 2001, GPs of the sentinel network of NIVEL
information per age group, because of differences in completed a questionnaire whenever they ordered
incidence and type of costs (e.g. absence from work) laboratory diagnostics for a gastroenteritis patient.
between age groups. They also reported all consulting cases. These data
Results from a community-based prospective were used to estimate the order frequency of a GP
cohort study (CB study) on gastroenteritis were used for laboratory diagnostics. The age groups on the
to calculate the incidence and the absolute number of NIVEL questionnaire were just slightly different (e.g.
gastroenteritis patients per age group. This study was 10–19 years instead of 12–17 years) from the cat-
performed in The Netherlands in 1999, in cooper- egories of the CB study and were therefore used as
ation with the sentinel general practice (GP) network proxies for our age groups.
of The Netherlands Institute for Health Services To examine whether the number of cases admitted
Research (NIVEL) [1]. This network consists of ap- to a hospital, a rather rare event, in the CB study
proximately 44 practices that cover 1 % of the Dutch differed from the number expected, we used data
population, representative regarding age, gender, from the National Medical Register (NMR) in The
regional distribution, and degree of urbanization. In Netherlands. This registry collects data on hospital
short, the cohort consisted of two consecutive, age- discharge diagnoses from all hospitalized patients in
stratified samples of individuals registered at GPs in The Netherlands, including information on duration
this network. Twenty-seven GPs participated in the of stay. Hospitalizations with a primary or any of the
first cohort and 31 in the second. Persons were invited secondary diagnoses coded with ICD-9 codes 001-009
by mail, and after 3 weeks, a reminder was sent to and 558 (codes related to gastroenteritis) [7, 8] for
non-respondents. At the start of the follow-up, all 1999 were obtained for analyses. The costs for only
participants in the cohort completed a baseline ques- hospital admissions with primary diagnosis gastro-
tionnaire. Cases with gastroenteritis identified in enteritis were calculated separately.
the cohorts during the 6 months of follow-up were
requested to submit stool samples, complete a ques-
Costs
tionnaire on risk factors, and complete a medical
diary for 4 weeks. In retrospect, a research nurse Costs were divided into direct medical costs, including
checked whether a reported GP visit was actually due medication (both over-the-counter and prescriptions),
to gastroenteritis. Consultations for other complaints GP costs, outpatient department costs, hospital in-
were not counted. In the medical diary, cases reported patient costs, and laboratory tests, direct non-medical
costs (transport costs) and indirect non-medical Table 1. Cost vectors in The Netherlands, 1999 (in E)
costs (productivity losses, costs of informal care). All
Costs (E)
costs were calculated per age group (age groups :
<1, 1–4, 5–11, 12–17, 18–64 and 65+ years) and were Direct medical costs
measured in Dutch guilders, but were converted to Prescription charges 5.26
Euros (E) for this study (1 NLG=E0.45, as of GP visit 16.59
Alternative treatment 40.60–50
1 January 2002).
Outpatient department visit 40.84
Hospital admission (per day) 235.97
Stool test* 58.20
Direct medical costs
Direct non-medical costs
Whenever a patient reported taking medication pre- Transport – private transport by 0.11
scribed by a doctor, a surcharge for the pharmacy was car (per km)
added to the price of the medication. Drugs included Indirect costs
antibiotics, oral rehydration solutions (ORS), pain- Average costs of absence from 120.06
work (per day)
killers, anti-diarrhoeic medication and other pre-
Average costs of informal care (per day) 112.43
scribed drugs. Full details and dosage were unknown.
Therefore the guidelines for average daily dosages * Assuming that in general one stool sample is tested for
from the Dutch pharmaco-therapeutical precept were campylobacter, yersinia, salmonella and shigella.
used. For antibiotics the average tariffs for macrolides
were used. The national average costs for different
types of drugs were taken from this precept [9]. Non- transportation by taxi or other public transport and
specified over-the-counter medication was disregarded parking fees. The average costs per kilometre by car,
in the cost calculations. were used in the cost calculation [10].
Each consultation with a GP or specialist in an Transport costs to and from the practice for
outpatient department and admission to a hospital alternative treatment were not calculated since no
generated consultation fees and transport to and from data were available on the average distance to such
the practice or hospital. Guidelines for average costs practices. These costs are likely to be only a very small
of the above components to be used in pharmaco- proportion of total costs and including them would
economic research, as issued by the Dutch National not significantly change the total cost estimate. Other
Health Insurance Board, were used in the cost calcu- transport costs, e.g. transport to a pharmacy, were
lation [10]. not calculated. Direct out-of-pocket expenses (such as
A consultation with a specialist in alternative the purchase of cleaning materials and replacements
treatment generated only consultation fees. For a for items spoilt as a result of the illness) were not
homeopath this was E50, for an acupuncturist this taken into consideration due to lack of reliable data.
was E40.60 per consultation (guidelines from the
Dutch Association of Classic Homeopaths and the
Indirect costs
Dutch Acupuncture Association).
The average costs of laboratory faeces tests for a Productivity losses were calculated for cases over 18
range of enteric pathogens were taken from the years old, using the friction cost method. In the Dutch
guidelines of the National Health Tariffs Authority. guidelines for cost research [10], age and sex are taken
into consideration, but no distinction is made by type
of occupation or education. Time lost from school
Direct non-medical costs
was estimated. However, in the absence of proper cost
The average distance from a Dutch household to their estimates for this, no societal costs were placed upon
GP was estimated to be 1.8 km [10]. We further as- it. For productivity losses due to informal care we
sumed (because of lack of data) that half of the also used the friction cost method. Age and sex of the
patients used a car for transport, while the other half carer could not be taken into account due to lack of
used a bicycle. The average distance from a Dutch data. We therefore used the average costs for a person
household to the nearest general hospital was esti- between 30 and 49 years old.
mated to be 7.0 km [10]. We assumed that all patients All cost vectors that were used in the cost estimate
used a car to go to the hospital. We disregarded are given in Table 1.
Age (years)
or work due to illness. Of these, 65 were younger than 1 and 11 years had relatively low costs per case
5 years, 71 were children going to school, 3 were (Table 3). Using the costs for hospital admissions
adults going to school and only 7 were adults with based on data from the NMR, the highest costs per
jobs. These adults were absent from work for an case were found in cases between 18 and 64 years old
average of 5 days (range 2–10 days). Eighty-two cases (Table 3).
(13 %), of which 79 were children, reported absence For the 4.5 million case episodes in the Dutch
from work by a carer in the same household. This population in 1999, the societal costs were estimated
was on average for 2 days (range 1–12 days) (Table 2). at E345 million (Table 4). Using the data from the
Indirect costs were in total E284 million. Despite a NMR did not significantly change this estimate.
small proportion of cases being absent from work
(1 %), the costs for absence from work were higher
Sensitivity analyses
than costs for informal care, because of the high
number of cases between 18 and 64 years old and the Confidence intervals were calculated per age group
higher costs per day (Table 4). The average costs were for the incidence rate, the number of GP consul-
E63.5 per case, 82% of the total average costs per case tations, the number of hospital admissions, the num-
(using the hospital data from the CB study) (Table 3). ber of days absent from work and the number of days
of informal care. With these CIs, the minimum and
maximum of the total number of cases and of related
Total costs
costs for these cost vectors were estimated per age
On average, the total costs per case were E77. In- group. Varying the incidence rates led to a range in
dividuals 18 years and older had relatively higher the total costs of E249–439 million. Of the four major
costs per person, with the highest costs being for cases cost components, varying the number of hospital ad-
over 65 years (E114 per case). Children aged between missions had the greatest impact on the total costs,
Table 3. Average costs (in E) per case in a prospective population-based cohort study in The Netherlands,
December 1998 to December 1999, by age group
Age (years)
* Based on data from the National Medical Registry, 1999. Patients with both a primary or secondary diagnosis. Total costs
for patients with only gastroenteritis as a primary diagnosis were estimated at E71.9 per case.
# Including costs from hospital admissions based on data from the CB study.
$ Including costs from hospital admissions based on data from the National Medical Registry, 1999.
leading to a range of E327–436 million. Varying all consulting cases with a campylobacter, salmonella
four cost vectors at the same time, led to a range in the and norovirus infection were E4.8, E2.8 and E2.1
total costs of E252 million (if all four minimum esti- million respectively. Of the cases in the CB study who
mates were taken) to E531 million (for the maximum did not consult the health-care system, 1.4, 0.5 and
estimates) (Table 5). 17.4% had a campylobacter, salmonella and noro-
virus infection, leading to the total costs of these
patients of E4.4, E1.3 and E44.0 million respectively.
Costs for specific pathogens causing gastroenteritis
The total costs of campylobacter, salmonella and
Using the direct method, the costs of norovirus in- norovirus infections (both consulting and non-
fections were estimated to be 6% of the total costs consulting) were E9, E4 and E46 million ; 3, 1 and
of gastroenteritis. In order to calculate the costs of 13 % of the total costs respectively. Using the costs of
campylobacter, salmonella and norovirus using the norovirus estimated with the direct method and the
indirect method, the costs for cases from the CB study costs of campylobacter and salmonella estimated with
were divided into costs for cases using the health-care the indirect method, the costs of these three pathogens
system [in total E62 million (18 %), average E148 per combined were 10 % of the total costs of gastroen-
case] and costs for cases not using the health-care teritis (Table 6).
system [in total E281 million (81 %), average E70 per
case]. Eighty-five per cent of the costs for cases using
DALYs
the health-care system were direct medical costs. In
10 % of the cases in the GP study a campylobacter In 1999, 241 persons died of gastroenteritis, with
infection was detected, in 4 % a salmonella infection relatively the highest percentage in cases 65 years and
and in 5 % a norovirus infection [1]. Taking the older (51 deaths/100 000 persons). As a result of this
age distribution into account, the total costs for premature death, 2563 years of life were lost.
Table 4. Estimated costs (rE1000) for The Netherlands of gastroenteritis, by age group
Age (years)
Incidence rate (per 1000 person-years)* 740 900 481 157 234 194 283
Estimated total number of cases 147 799 698 802 663 629 173 750 2 379 018 413 401 4 476 399
Medication 296 841 528 401 4 733 1 889 8 687
GP visit 413 1 054 648 192 774 572 3 653
Alternative treatment 40 0 0 0 0 3 497 3 537
Outpatient department visit 33 226 0 0 0 0 258
Hospital admission CB 2 274 0 0 0 0 40 645 42 920
Hospital admission NMR# 4 025 4 270 1 027 508 10 849 19 277 39 956
Stool tests 105 347 188 53 454 418 1 565
Direct medical sub-total$ 3 162 2 469 1 363 646 5 961 47 020 60 620
Direct medical sub-total· 4 913 6 738 2 390 1 154 16 810 25 652 57 657
Transport costs 9 17 8 2 10 34 81
Direct non-medical sub-total 9 17 8 2 10 34 81
Absence by case 0 0 0 0 201 971 0 201 971
Absence of other person for 4 606 18 943 21 945 15 628 20 978 0 82 100
informal care
Indirect sub-total 4 606 18 943 21 945 15 628 222 949 0 284 070
Total$ 7 777 21 429 23 316 16 276 228 919 47 055 344 771
Total· 9 527 25 699 24 343 16 784 239 769 25 686 341 808
* Standardized for age, gender and cohort. Standardized for the Dutch population, 1999.
# Based on data from the National Medical Registry, 1999. Both patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis. Total costs
for patients with only gastroenteritis as a primary diagnosis were estimated at E20 million.
$ Including costs from hospital admissions based on data from the CB study.
· Including costs from hospital admissions based on data from the National Medical Registry, 1999.
Table 5. Estimated ranges of the total costs (rE1000) for the cases with more severe gastroenteritis 50 332
for The Netherlands of gastroenteritis, by age group (0.03r37 % of the estimated total number of cases).
The total number of YLD was therefore 64 326 (95 %
5th 95th
CI 32 998–90 620). The total number of DALYs was
percentile percentile
thus 66 889 (95 % CI 35 561–93 183).
Varying the incidence rate* 249 223 439 448
Varying the cost vectors
GP consultations 342 494 352 182 DISCUSSION
Hospital admissions 326 789 435 909
In this study, the average costs per patient with
Absence from work 302 482 376 960
Informal care 314 350 400 088 gastroenteritis were E77. The total costs of patients
with gastroenteritis in The Netherlands were esti-
Varying all four cost vectors 251 802 530 825
mated at E345 million in 1999. The combined costs
* 95 % CI of incidence per 1000 person-years : <1 year, of campylobacter, salmonella and norovirus were
606–875 ; 1–4 years, 766–1034 ; 5–11 years, 389–575 ; 12–17 approximately 10–17 % of the total costs of gastroen-
years, 95–219 ; 18–64 years, 169–298 ; 65+ years, 126–262. teritis. In 1999, gastroenteritis was associated with a
loss of approximately 67 000 DALYs.
In the CB study, duration of illness was known for Even with relatively low costs per case (E77), the
619 persons. A total of 387 (63 %) cases had com- total costs are high because of a high incidence of gas-
plaints less than 2 weeks (on average 5.2 days) and for troenteritis in The Netherlands (283/1000 person-
232 (37 %) cases the complaints lasted longer than 2 years). Varying this incidence per age group resulted
weeks (on average 23.7 days). The number of YLD in a range of the costs of E249–439 million. However,
for the cases with mild gastroenteritis were 13 993 this range should probably be smaller, since it is un-
(0.005r63 % of the estimated total number of cases), likely that the incidences are either all in the highest
Table 6. Estimated costs (rE1000) for including non-infectious and chronic diseases [17, 18],
The Netherlands for specific pathogens causing or on specific pathogens [19–22]. Therefore, their re-
gastroenteritis, by age group sults are difficult to compare with ours. A recent study
in England (the IID study), similar to ours, estimated
% of total
the total costs of gastroenteritis at E1039 million [2].
costs for
gastroenteritis When the number of inhabitants of England is taken
Costs (E344 771) into account, these costs are almost equal to ours :
about E22 per inhabitant.
Direct method
The use of ICD codes in mortality statistics and
Norovirus 19 579 6
Direct costs* 4 192 1 hospital discharge diagnoses has some limitations,
Indirect costs 15 386 4 because the ICD codes are not very specific. Most
Indirect method hospitalizations and deaths were found for the rather
Patients using the 62 147 18 non-specific code 558 (other non-infectious gastroen-
health-care system teritis and colitis). Exclusion of this ICD code would
Direct costs* 53 023 15 produce a fall in the number of hospitalizations from
Indirect costs 9 124 3
17 978 to 5906, the number of deaths from 241 to 40
Patients not using the 280 921 81
health-care system and the number of DALYs from 67 000 to 65 000.
Direct costs* 6 070 2 This code (558), however, strongly correlates with,
Indirect costs 274 851 80 for example, the incidence of laboratory-confirmed
Campylobacter 9 209 3 rotavirus [8]. To obtain more reliable estimates of the
Salmonella 4 044 1 true number of hospitalizations due to gastroenteritis,
Norovirus 46 059 13 specific hospital studies into the use of ICD codes are
* Including transport costs.
needed.
For the estimates of the costs for specific pathogens
it was assumed that within the groups of cases con-
or all in the lowest percentiles for all age groups at the sulting and not consulting the health-care system,
same time. A variation in the major four cost com- patients have the same costs, regardless of their aeti-
ponents also lead to substantial variation in the costs. ology. However, for example, duration of illness is on
For example, the costs for hospital admissions range average longer in patients with a campylobacter in-
between E25 000 and E134 000 in total. fection when compared to patients with a norovirus
We consider the costs (and DALYs) estimate a infection [23]. Therefore, costs of absence from work
minimum because of several reasons. In our study we and informal care are probably higher for patients
did not measure any cases with complicated gastro- with a campylobacter infection. Also duration of
enteritis, leading to haemolytic uraemic syndrome, hospital admission might vary between pathogens.
Guillain–Barré syndrome, sepsis, or arthritis. Neither This might explain the difference in the costs of noro-
costs of hospitalizations and deaths, nor costs of virus infection calculated with the direct and the in-
treatment and long-term health consequences for direct method. The costs calculated with the indirect
these relatively expensive conditions are included in method are probably too high for cases with a noro-
our calculations. Also, we disregarded several cost virus infection and too low for cases with campylo-
vectors, such as non-specified over-the-counter medi- bacter and/or salmonella infection. Consequently, the
cation, direct out-of-pocket expenses, taxi use and pathogen-specific costs should be considered as rough
parking fees, although we believe that the effect of estimates. Although often regarded as a mild disease,
these aspects on the total would be limited. In order to the costs of a norovirus infection are substantial (E20
quantify the costs of informal care more precisely million, calculated with the direct method), mainly
more information on carers should be obtained in due to absence from work by a carer (79 % of the total
further studies (e.g. who was the carer, and what was costs).
his/her work). The number of DALYs calculated by us (67 000),
This is the first cost-of-illness study of gastroenter- indicates that the public health burden of gastroen-
itis in The Netherlands. There have been studies in teritis is substantial. In the Dutch Public Health
other countries, but mainly focusing on only food- Status and Forecasts (PHSF), published in 1997,
borne illness [3, 4, 15, 16], on gastrointestinal diseases the number of DALYs for a large number of diseases
19. Powell M, Ebel E, Schlosser W. Considering uncer- in the Netherlands and the related economic costs
tainty in comparing the burden of illness due to food- [in Dutch]. Infectieziekten Bulletin 2000 ; 11 : 4–8.
borne microbial pathogens. Int J Food Microbiol 2001 ; 23. Chin J, ed. Control of communicable diseases manual,
69 : 209–215. 17th edn. Washington : American Public Health As-
20. Frühwirth M, Berger K, Ehlken B, Moll-Schüler I, sociation, 2000.
Brösl S, Mutz I. Economic impact of community- 24. Ruwaard D, Kramers PGN, eds. The Dutch Public
and nosocomially acquired rotavirus gastroenteritis in Health Status and Forecasts Report 1997. Overview [in
Austria. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001 ; 20 : 184–188. Dutch]. Bilthoven/Utrecht : National Institute of Public
21. Morales RA, McDowell RM. Economic consequences Health and the Environment/Elsevier/de tijdstroom,
of Salmonella enterica serovar enteriditis infection 1997.
in humans and the U.S. egg industry. In : Saeed AM, ed. 25. Havelaar AH, Wit MAS de, Koningsveld R van,
Salmonella enterica serovar enteriditis in humans and Kempen E van. Health burden in the Netherlands
animals. Epidemiology, pathogenesis and control. due to infection with thermophylic Campylobacter
Ames : Iowa State University Press, 1999 : 271–290. spp. Epidemiol Infect 2000 ; 125 : 505–522.
22. Pelt W van, Giessen AW van de, Leeuwen WJ van, 26. Bartelds AIM. Continuous morbidity registration
et al. Origin, extent and costs of human salmonellosis. sentinel network the Netherlands, 2001. NIVEL,
Part 2 : estimate of the extent of human salmonellosis Utrecht, 2002.