Pm(Khu 702) Unit-3 Notes
Pm(Khu 702) Unit-3 Notes
Pm(Khu 702) Unit-3 Notes
Project Management
What is Project?
Projects are temporary, no matter how many years they last. This is because
projects exist to solve particular problems and achieve specific goals efficiently.
As Joseph M. Juran rightly put it, “A project is a problem scheduled for solution.”
The size of the project is thus determined by the nature of the problem it is intended to
solve. That said, the benefits of project management in organizations go beyond
merely keeping within the project’s allocated resources, including timelines, cost,
deliverables, and scope. The difference is in the value and efficiency that project
management delivers. The project manager is in full control of the project and works to
keep all stakeholders on the same page. This accords project teams the opportunity to
collaborate on tasks and own the project’s vision and align with it in the course of
executing their tasks.
Definition of Project
In the field of project management, a project is a brief undertaking that is carried out to
produce a special good, service, or outcome. There are several planned tasks involved
all with clear outputs, boundaries, and restrictions. This article focuses on discussing
Projects in Project Management.
A project is a well-planned and controlled endeavor that follows a defined set of goals,
constraints, and time frames to produce a desired result.
1. It usually has a defined scope, budget, and resources.
5. These are defined by the output they produce which can be a product, a service,
or a particular outcome.
1. Clear Goals: Projects are one of a kind of projects with clear, quantifiable goals
to meet within a defined time frame in line with an organization’s strategic
priorities.
2. Scope Definition: The scope defines the scope of the project, defines the scope
of work, and defines what is not included in the scope of work.
3. Engineering Projects: This category includes projects that involve the design,
development, and construction of machinery.
1. Initiation
A project officially begins when it enters the initiation phase. A project beginning is
known as the commencement phase. Stakeholder identification, goal-setting, scope
definition and purpose and goal definition are all part of it. Creating a project charter
which describes the goals, limitations and preliminary requirements of the project is a
common step in this phase. To make sure the project fits with organizational objectives.
In the initiation phase there are some tasks we have to follow them:
1. Definition of project’s purpose and goal: Clear the reasons behind project
existence and set the available goals.
2. Planning
Planning is a critical phase, where a detailed roadmap for the project is developed. It
involves breaking the project down into smaller tasks, the creation of a thorough
project plan resource allocation and timetables. The project execution and
management throughout its lifecycle are defined in part by planning phase.
1. Task division and planning: Breakdown the project into subdivisions or tasks
and setting timelines for their completion.
3. Execution
The project planning is executed in execution phase. Tasks are completed, resources
are used effectively and team members participation is crucial. Project managers make
ensures that the project proceeding according to the planned schedule and allocated
resources.
1. Task execution: Completing the assigned work as per the schedule and quality
standards.
Monitoring and Controlling stage involves monitoring the progress of the project
against the plan. Monitoring allows for the identification of deviations from the project
plan and take corrective actions to ensure the project stays on track. Control measures
are implemented to manage changes effectively and ensure project success.
5. Closure
The closure phase is when all project activities are completed and project results are
delivered to project stakeholders and lessons learned are documented for future work.
The closure activities ensure a seamless transition of project outputs and a formal end
to the project.
Project manager
A PM is a leader who guides projects from the drawing board to the finish line. They
make sure everything runs smoothly and stays on schedule. They gather necessary
resources, unite team members, and work on continuous improvement.
PMs connect the day-to-day work with the bigger picture. They support the broader
objectives of the company and satisfy stakeholder needs.
PMs juggle a variety of core responsibilities to lead a project through hurdles and
changes. Mastery in each of these areas contributes to a smoother experience from the
perspective of both team members and stakeholders:
Project planning: PMs initiate the planning process, clearly defining the
project's scope, goals, and objectives. They develop detailed plans outlining
tasks, resources, timelines, and deliverables, creating a solid foundation for
project execution.
Team coordination: Project managers assemble and direct project teams,
assigning tasks based on members' skills and experience. PMs focus and unify
team efforts by promoting collaboration, resolving conflicts, and leading effective
team meetings.
Risk management: PMs identify potential risks early, analyze their possible
impact, and develop mitigation strategies. This proactive approach minimizes
disruptions to the project’s schedule, quality, and budget.
Budget oversight: PMs estimate costs, establish budgets, track spending, and
adjust as necessary to keep the project within financial boundaries while
achieving fiscal efficiency.
Client communication: They maintain open and transparent communication
with clients and stakeholders. PMs provide updates, respond to inquiries, and use
feedback to adapt project scope to meet or exceed client expectations.
Maintaining quality standards: PMs implement quality control processes to
ensure deliverables meet agreed-upon standards and satisfy client requirements.
This helps maintain project integrity.
The success of any project depends heavily on the unique blend of soft and hard skills
possessed by the PM. Here are some of the critical soft skills that PMs need to excel in
their role:
Project appraisal
Project appraisal is the analysis of costs and benefits of a proposed project with the
purpose of ensuring a rational allocation of limited funds among alternative investment
opportunities in view of the specified goals.
1. Financial appraisal.
2. Economic appraisal.
3. Technological appraisal.
5. Managerial appraisal.
6. Environmental appraisal.
FINANCIAL APPRAISAL
One of the most commonly used techniques for appraisal of capital investment
proposal is the cash payback or simply, the payback. It attempts to calculate the
period, known as payback period, required to recover the initial investment out of
inflow of net cash flows/savings or profits as a result of the investment. Payback period
is defined as the number of years required for the savings in costs or net cash inflow
after tax but before depreciation) to recoup the original cost of the project. In other
words, it represents the number of years in which the investment is expected to "pay
for itself". In the words of
Coge Tago a ncame k rs a ee of Firaneing to arcenine th dat
This method is based on the principle that every capital expenditure pays itself back
over a number of years. It is called by different names Payoff Period, Payout Period,
Breakeven Period or Recoupment Period.
Payback period is the time required to recover the original investment through income
from the project. For example, if the capital investment on the project is & 20,00,000
and annual income/cash inflow is constantly
* 4,00,000 during its economic life of four years, the payback period will be 5 years (&
20,00,000 ÷ 7 4,00,000). The following formula can be applied to calculate the Payback
period :
The annual cash inflows will be computed as gross earnings less total operating costs
excluding depreciation. However, if the annual income is not uniform, the payback
period will be counted as the number of years over which the income accumulated
together will equal the capital invested. As a rule, the shorter the payback period, the
better is the investment proposal.
(iv) the project carries high risk and only the immediate future can be forecast with
certainty:
(v) the concern is likely to suffer from a shortage of cash, per funds are difficult to
obtain when tight monetary conditions are prevailing in the country and a quick return
is essential for rapid repayment:
(vi) the industry is experiencing rapid technological change and the shorter pay-off
period offers some protection from the danger of obsolescence; and only a limited
number of years.
(i) It is a highly suitable method when the project has shorter gestation period and the
project cost is also less.
(iv) It is useful to the firm which is cager to get back the cash invested in a capital
expenditure project as early as possible.
(v) Since this method considers the cash flows during the payback period of the project,
the estimates are likely to be reliable and the results accurate.
(vi) It enables the entrepreneur to select an investment proposal which would yield
quick return of funds invested.
Limitations of Payback Period Method: Payback period method suffers from the
following limitations :
(i) Payback period method emphasises more on liquidity than profitability aspect. It is
because of the fact that this method gives importance to an early recovery of cash
outlay and liquidity. (ir) It does not take into account the cash inflows earned after the
payback period and hence the actual profitability of the project cannot be correctly
assessed.
(in) It ignores the time value of money and does not consider the magnitude and
timings of cash inflows. It assesses all cash flows a equal though they occur in different
periods.
(iv) It avoids the cost of capital which is a very important factor in making
(vi) It suits only small projects requiring small investment and a short period of time.
Accounting rate of return (ARR) is based on accounting profits rather han cash inflows.
It is defined as the percentage of average profit after tax to average investment
calculated over the life of the project. For this purpose, capital employed or average
investment and profit earned are determined according to commonly accepted
principle of accounting. The following formula is used to calculate ARR :
The average return (or profit) is calculated by adding all the earnings after taxes and
dividing them by the project's economic life. Average investment is the simple average
of the values of assets at the beginning and end of the useful life of the asset, which
would be zero.
If ARR is more than the predetermined rate of return, chen the project will be accepted.
If ARR is less than the predetermined rate of return, then it will be rejected. However,
ranking of mutually exclusive projects would depend on the higher ARR.
(i) It is simple to calculate ARR and this method is easily understandable. (ii) It is based
on readily available accounting information. (ili) It considers total benefits during the
entire life of the project.
(i) It places more emphasis on profit and not on cach inflows flows which are more
relevant for appraising an investment proposal.
(iii) It does not consider the reinvestment of profits earned over a period of time.
(iv) It fails to differentiate between the size of the investment required for each project.
Competing investment proposals may have the same ARR, but may require different
average investment.
Since money has a time-value, time factor in investment is fundamental rather than
incidental for the purpose of evaluating investments. Cash flows received in different
years should not be treated to have uniform value. The nominal value of a rupee
received today is more than a rupee to be received a year later. The Discounted Cash
Flow (DCF) method takes the time factor of income into consideration while the
foregoing methods (viz., Payback and Return on Investment methods) do not take into
account the time factor.
Thus, DCF technique considers the net cashflow as representing the recovery of original
investment, plus a return on capital invested. The analysis under DCF method may be
made in two ways :
(a) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) or Discounted Return Rate (DRR)
Method.
(b) Net Present Value (NPV) or Excess Present Value (EPV) Method.
The main feature of both the methods is that the return obtained from a number of
capital projects with different life assessments and having an uneven pattern of cash
flow of return from year to year, can be brought down to a common base with the help
of the Present Value Tables, (Table A and Table B given at the end of this book) so that
the results are comparable with a fair degree of accuracy. But there is one major
difference between these two methods.
Under the first method, no discount rate is assumed ; it is found out by trial of a given
rate of discount and error. But in the second method, the calculations are made with
the help of a given rate of discount.
Net Present Value (NPV)
Net Present Value is the value obtained by discounting all estimated cash outflows and
inflows of an investment proposal by a chosen hypothetical target rate of return or cost
of capital. Thus, it requires the computation of the present values of all future cash
inflows using some predetermined minimum desired rate of return, also called cut-off
rate. It is generally based on the cost of capital.
NPV takes into consideration the time value of money and attempts to calculate the
return on investments by introducing the factor of time element.
It recognises the fact that a rupee earned today is worth more than the same rupee
earned tomorrow. Thus, the cash flows arising at different periods of time differ in value
and are not comparable unless their equivalent present values are found.
Under this method the discount rate is assumed. Usually, the assumed discount rate
should be equal to be company's weighted average cost of capital.
Unless a capital project is expected to yield atleast as much as the cost of capital, the
project should not be accepted. Otherwise by getting into such uneconomical projects,
the company runs the risk of lowering its profits and the earnings per share in the long-
run.
NPV may be defined as the excess of present value of project cash inflows (stream of
benefits) over that of outflows (cash outlays). The present ralue (PV) of a future cash
flow is calculated with the help of following formula:
PV=S x 1/(1+r)t
where,
Net Present Value of any project is the aggregate present value of net cash flows over the operating
the project.
(ii) It indicates the value added to the total assets of the firm by undertaking the proposed
(iii) It allows for the recovery of the initial investment and interest, cost of investment.
BCR method is a modified form of the NPV method. It is the ratio of gross discounted benefits to
gross discounted costs. Hence, this method may be used as an extension of NPV and expressed in
terms of co-efficient or percentage. The following formula may be used to calculate the BCR :
(or)
where,
In this method, higher the benefit cost/ratio, the better is the project. Projects to be accepted must
have benefit/cost ratio higher than 1. BCR method is highly useful for ranking the projects on the
basis of their profitability. It suffers from the same limitations as the PV technique.
IRR method is known by many names like yield on investment method, marginal efficiency of capital
method, marginal productivity of capital method, rate of return method, time adjusted rate of return
method, discounted cash flow method, yield method, etc. This method is used when the cost of
investment and the annual cash inflows are known and the unknown rate of return is to be
calculated. It takes into account time value of money by discounting inflows and cash flows.
Internal Rate of Return is defined as the interest rate that equates the present value of the
expected future receipts (net profit plus depreciation) to the cost of the investment outlay. It is the
time adjusted rate of return as well as the maximum rate of interest that could be paid for the capital
employed over the life of an investment without loss on the project. To put it differently, it is the
discount rate that equates or breaks evenly the present value of initial outlay with the present value
of the expected net cash flows or reduces the net present value to zero.
This method is popularly known as the "trial and error" method because it involves making a series
of trial calculations in an attempt to compute the correct interest which discounts the cash flows to
(ii) The intermediate cash inflows are financed at a cost of capital equal
(iii) The reinvestment rates and future costs of capital are equal to each other, and the rates remain
(a) List the annual sales and costs other than depreciation, and deduct the latter from the former to
(b) Obtain the capital cost. Often this will be at present value because the amount spent is spent in
(c) Calculate the present value of the net cash flow by using an appropriate rate of interest. This rate
is found by trial and error from the present value tables. The object is to make the cash flow equal to
ECONOMIC APPRAISAL
Economic appraisal is done from the view point of society or economy as a whole. Thus, it is done
from a wider angle not merely in financial terms. The economic appraisal should cover whether it fits
into national priorities, contributes to the development of that sector of economy and benefits justify
the consumption of scarce resources of the nation. Hence, economic appraisa! is also called Social
Cost Benefit Analysis (SCBA). The concept of SCBA was evolved in 1844 when Jules Dupuit, a
French engineer, referred to it in his paper on the measurement of 'Utilities of Public Works.' In 1936,
Flood Control Act, 1936 of USA provided that a project should be deemed feasible only it sum-total of
benefits to whomsoever they may accrue exceeds the estimated costs, highlighting the social nature
of investment decision. In UK, this concept was applied first time in 1917, for evaluating M1
Motorway project and the nationalised industries were also directed to use SCBA. India has also been
SCBA is an assessment of expected total costs to be incurred and benefits derived out of a project
that is under consideration from the society or community point of view. A project is considered to be
socially viable if the benefits which accrue from the project serve the larger social purpose. The main
feature of these benefits is serving the interest of those who have no stake in that project. The
benefits resulting from a project are enjoyed ›y the people who do not directly contribute or pay for
such benefits. Such benefits are like creation of additional employment opportunities, development
of backward areas or districts, growth of village and rural industries, or development of ancillary
projects of substantial advantage to rural areas and community in general. Social costs like harmful
effects of industrialisation, environmental pollution, scarcity of resources etc. are taken into account
In social cost benefit analysis, all costs and benefits irrespective to whom they accrue and regardless
of whether they are paid for or not are relevant. The society's concern for savings and investments is
reflected in social cost benefit analysis where savings are valued higher than consumption. So the
acceptance or rejection of a project is viewed in term of total social or national impact like its effect
SCBA is primarily used for evaluating public investments to be financed by the government. SCBA is
also relevant to private investments which have to be approved by various governmental and quasi-
governmental agencies which bring to bear larger national considerations in their decisions.
SCA aids in evaluating individual projects within the planning framework which spells out national
economic objectives and broad allocation of resources to various sectors. SCBA is concerned with
tactical decision making within the framework of broad strategic choices defined by planning at the
macro level. The perspectives and parameters provided by the macro level plans serve as the basis
SCBA Approaches
There are two important approaches for SCBA, namely, UNIDO approach and Little-Mirrlees approach.
The UNIDO approach was first articulated in the guidelines for project evaluation by United Nations in
TECHNOLOGICAL APPRAISAL
Technological appraisal refers to the review of product mix, production capacities, process of
manufacture, engineering know-how and technical collaboration, sources of raw materials and
consumables, location and site, plant size, building, plant and equipment, manpower requirements,
water and steam, gas, fuel electricity, infrastructural facilities like roads, bridges, railways, airways,
latest technology to be adopted, availability of research and development facilities, etc. In other
words, technological appraisal evaluates technological alternatives and helps in choice of most
(i) To examine the rationale of proposed technology and provide an insight into future technological
developments.
(ii) To assess the possibility of goal achievement with the preferred technology.
(iti) To avail better available technology in terms of cost effectiveness and efficiency.
(iv) To search a technology which can be adjusted with present level of technical skills by initiating
as follows :
(ii) training needs of personnel for the present technology and the new technology ;
(iv) input base for the technology or its compatibility with the input substitutes ;
(x) other considerations such as side effects of technology transfer on layoff of labour.
The following factors need to be considered for the purpose of technological appraisal.
(i) Type of Technology: It is important that adopted technology should be assessed in terms of
(ii) Scale of Operations : A minimum scale of operation is required to ensure economic viability of
the unit. Productivity can also be ensured by allowing economic operation at minimum scale. For
example, minimum cane crushing capacity is required for the launch of a sugar project.
(iii) Location: It has an important bearing with regard to the sources of raw materials, availability of
power, fuel, transport, skilled and unskilled labour and in relation to the markets to be served by the
project.
(iv) Layout Plan: Plant layout at the location site should be assessed in terms of the present need
and possible need of future expansion. It should also be examined with reference to the site plan.
(v) Construction Schedule: It requires scrutiny of physical elements of the project from
engineering design to installation and testing of equipment and commercial production. Estimated
project cost is largely affected by the realistic assessment of the construction schedule.
(vi) Supply of Water, Power and Fuel : Plant operation needs adequate supply of water, power
and fuel, etc. Full assurance of these supplies has to be obtained from different government agencies
and other suppliers. Alternative arrangements like diesel generating sets should be examined with
(vii) Waste, Effluents and Byproducts Disposal : Certain industries like sugar, chemical, etc. are
responsible for release of effluents, waste etc. and they are harmful to human and marine life. In
such cases, effluent may require proper treatment before it can be discharged in a river. Waste and
(viii) Cost Estimates : Cost estimates need careful examination of the assumptions on which they
have been based. It has to be done with regard to plant and machinery, buildings and other fixed
assets. Similarly, provision for escalation in the prices of imported and indigenous machinery made
in the project report need to be examined with regard to current economic situation and market
conditions. Arrangement of components and spare parts should also be examined in the context of
operational requirements.
COMMERCIAL APPRAISAL
All human activities, may be economic, social or anything else, are essentially
directed at satisfying, weeds and wants of human beings through the use of
environmental resources. Broadly, there are two types of projects viz., production
oriented projects and service oriented projects. Production oriented projects refer to
those projects that produce physical goods like cement, paper, steel, chemicals,
fertilizers, etc. These projects convert the natural resources endowments into saleable
and exchangeable products and involve a large number of physical changes and
disruptions on environment and, thus, cause environmental and ecological imbalance.
Environmentalists are very much concerned with such projects. The second type of
projects are concerned which producing or rendering different kinds of services such as
health, education, transport, energy, defence, law and order etc. These projects are
non-physical in nature and they do not directly cause any physical changes in the
environment.
Environmental management refers to environmental planning, protection,
monitoring, assessment, research, education, conservation and substantial use of
resources. For effective environment management, a wide network of legislation is also
in force. Now, environmental clearance for all the major projects on the basis of their
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been made legally mandatory.