Proposed Unloading Area for SBEC

#ONESOL
Comparison of Unloading Area

Materials: PCC, CAP, Asphalt, and
HDPE Mat
A comparison of materials for optimizing temporary unloading
area.
September 23, 2024

Propose Laydown Area
AGENDA
 Introduction
 Material 1: Portland Cement Concrete Pavement
(PCCP)
 Material 2: Compacted Aggregate Pavement (CAP)
 Material 3: Asphalt
 Material 4: HDPE Mat
 Comparative Analysis
 Cost Considerations
 Environmental Impact
 Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
An unloading area is essential for solar projects,

enabling the acceptance of deliveries at any time, in any
weather condition. This ensures that critical materials and
equipment are offloaded efficiently, preventing delays and
keeping the project on schedule. A dependable unloading
zone helps protect valuable solar components from damage
due to weather, while also ensuring smooth logistical
operations, vital for maintaining project momentum and
meeting deadlines.
MATERIAL 1: PCCP
Description: Mixture of cement, water, and aggregates.

 Advantages:
Highly durable
Resistant to heavy loads and environmental factors
Low maintenance once set
 Disadvantages:
Expensive and time-consuming to install
Hard to remove after use
Higher environmental footprint (cement production)
MATERIAL 2: CAP
Description: A surface layer made primarily from compacted aggregates,

such as crushed stone, gravel, or recycled concrete.
 Advantages:
Cheaper compared to PCC or Asphalt
Quick installation
Environmental benefits
 Disadvantages:
Not as durable compared to PCC or Asphalt
Periodic maintenance (re-compaction & additional aggregates
MATERIAL 3: ASPHALT
Description: Bitumen-bound aggregate mix, commonly used for roadways.

 Advantages:
Faster installation compared to PCC
Flexible, can handle minor ground movement
Recyclable and easier to remove or repurpose
 Disadvantages:
Less durable than PCC (subject to weathering and heat)
Regular maintenance required
Emissions during production and installation
MATERIAL 4: HDPE MATS
Description: Lightweight, portable mats made of plastic for temporary surfaces.

 Advantages:
Rapid installation and removal
Reusable and highly portable
Minimal environmental disturbance (less ground compaction)
 Disadvantages:
Less durable for heavy, long-term use
Can become slippery in wet conditions
Initial costs may be high
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
PROPERTY PCC CAP ASPHALT HDPE MATS
Durability High Medium Medium Low-Medium
Installation Speed Slow Medium Medium Fast
Maintenance Low Low-Medium Medium-High Low
Reusability Low Low-Medium Medium High
Environmental Impact High Low Medium-High Low

COST CONSIDERATIONS
 PCC:
High upfront cost, but low long-term maintenance.
 CAP:
Low-Medium cost, occasional maintenance needed.
 Asphalt:
Medium upfront cost, but more frequent maintenance is needed.
 HDPE Mat:
High initial cost but offers flexibility and reusability which could lower costs over time.
COST COMPARISON
MATERIAL COST FOR 2500 sqm REMARKS
PCC Php 8,562,560 Quote from JDMM
CAP Php 3,340,000 Quote from JDMM
ASPHALT Php 9,600,000 Estimate only
HDPE MAT Php 6,702,500 Quote from Quiyuan

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
 PCC:
High carbon emissions during cement production.
Difficult to remove and recycle.
 CAP
Low impact because of natural materials
Can use recycled concrete
 Asphalt:
Bitumen emits harmful pollutants during production.
Recyclable but not without environmental costs.
 HDPE Mat:
Low impact during production and installation.
Reusable, with minimal disturbance to the ground.
CONCLUSION
 PCC: Best for heavy loads and long-term durability,
but installation and environmental costs are high.
 CAP: Much cheaper to install due to the lower cost
of raw materials (crushed stone, gravel) and
simpler construction techniques.
 Asphalt: Offers balance between cost, durability,
and installation speed, but requires regular
maintenance.
 HDPE Mat: Ideal for short-term or flexible use, easy
to install, remove, and reuse, but not as durable for
heavy loads.

Proposed Unloading Area for SBEC

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Proposed Unloading Area for SBEC

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Proposed Unloading Area for SBEC

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

#ONESOL

Comparison of Unloading Area

September 23, 2024

An unloading area is essential for solar projects,

Description: Mixture of cement, water, and aggregates.

Description: A surface layer made primarily from compacted aggregates,

Description: Bitumen-bound aggregate mix, commonly used for roadways.

MATERIAL 4: HDPE MATS

Description: Lightweight, portable mats made of plastic for temporary surfaces.

Durability High Medium Medium Low-Medium

Installation Speed Slow Medium Medium Fast

Maintenance Low Low-Medium Medium-High Low

Reusability Low Low-Medium Medium High

Environmental Impact High Low Medium-High Low

MATERIAL COST FOR 2500 sqm REMARKS

PCC Php 8,562,560 Quote from JDMM

CAP Php 3,340,000 Quote from JDMM

ASPHALT Php 9,600,000 Estimate only

HDPE MAT Php 6,702,500 Quote from Quiyuan

You might also like