Jefferson as Speaker 1

Good evening honorable judges, esteemed opponents, and

respected audience,

I stand before you as the first speaker of the Anti-abortion team, and
today, we argue against the legalization of abortion. The act of abortion is
not just a medical procedure—it is the deliberate termination of a potential
human life. It is not a matter of choice, but a matter of profound moral,
ethical, and societal implications. As we delve into this important issue, let us
not lose sight of the two fundamental aspects at play: the right to life of the
unborn child, and the responsibility we have to protect that life.

1. The Unborn Have a Right to Life

First and foremost, we must acknowledge a fundamental truth: life begins

at conception. Every human life, from the moment of fertilization, holds
intrinsic value and dignity. It is the position of the anti-abortion side that this
unborn life is not just a clump of cells or a potential being—it is a unique,
living entity with the right to live.

This right to life is enshrined in both moral philosophy and legal frameworks
around the world. Whether we refer to it from a scientific, ethical, or religious
standpoint, the truth remains that the unborn child is a living human being
with the potential to grow, learn, and contribute to society. To terminate that
life is to strip it of the most basic human right: the right to live.

2. The Moral and Ethical Responsibility

Secondly, legalizing abortion encourages a dangerous precedent where we

allow the state to sanction the termination of life based on subjective
reasons, such as inconvenience or personal choice. The question we must
ask ourselves is this: Where do we draw the line? If we allow abortion
based on a woman’s personal circumstances, what is next? Are we prepared
to accept the termination of life under other circumstances as well, like the
elderly or those with disabilities?

By legalizing abortion, we send the message that human life can be

discarded when it is deemed inconvenient, and that morality is negotiable.
The ethics of respecting life should not depend on one's stage of
development. Just as we protect the lives of individuals after birth, so should
we protect the lives of the unborn.
3. Psychological and Physical Harm to Women

Our opponents may argue that legalizing abortion is necessary for the health
and well-being of women, but we must ask: At what cost? Abortion does
not come without consequences. Many studies indicate that women who
undergo abortions experience higher rates of mental health problems,
including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The
emotional toll of terminating a pregnancy often lingers long after the
procedure is done.

Furthermore, there are physical risks associated with abortion. While medical
procedures have advanced, no medical intervention is without risk. Abortion
can lead to complications such as infections, heavy bleeding, and future
infertility. No woman should be put in a position where her physical and
emotional health is jeopardized for the sake of convenience or expediency.

4. The Value of Adoption as a Viable Option

Instead of abortion, there is an alternative that we should advocate for:

adoption. Adoption allows the child to live, while also providing an
opportunity for families who are unable to have children to raise a child in a
loving and supportive environment. Many children are waiting to be adopted
by families who long to give them a home. In fact, there are countless
families who would cherish the opportunity to raise a child, and adoption is a
beautiful alternative to ending a life.

If we legalize abortion, we will be telling women that terminating their

pregnancy is the easiest solution. We must instead encourage a culture of
support, offering alternatives to abortion such as adoption and providing
resources to women facing unexpected pregnancies.

5. Societal Implications: The Impact on Society

Finally, we must consider the broader societal implications of legalizing

abortion. What does it say about our society if we condone the deliberate
ending of life? Legalizing abortion reinforces a culture of disposability, where
human life is viewed as expendable when it does not fit a desired outcome.
In the long term, such attitudes can erode the fabric of our society,
diminishing respect for life in all its forms.

Furthermore, we risk promoting a society that neglects its most vulnerable

members—those who are unborn and voiceless. By protecting the unborn,
we build a society that values life, that promotes responsibility, and that
fosters compassion for those who cannot speak for themselves.
6. The Role of Government in Protecting Life

As a society, it is the role of the government to protect its citizens. While we

recognize the importance of personal freedom, there are limits to that
freedom when it comes to actions that harm others. Abortion is one such
action. The government has a duty to protect the most vulnerable members
of society, and that includes the unborn. By upholding the sanctity of life, we
demonstrate a commitment to protecting all citizens, from the youngest to
the oldest.

Conclusion: The Case Against Abortion Legalization

In conclusion, the legalization of abortion is not a simple matter of personal

choice—it is a profound moral, ethical, and societal issue. We cannot ignore
the inherent value of the unborn, nor the potential harm that legalizing
abortion poses to women, to families, and to society as a whole.

We call on the judges to consider the consequences of legalizing abortion—

not only for the unborn child but also for the future of our society. We ask you
to choose life, to choose compassion, and to protect the most vulnerable
among us. Abortion should not be legalized, for the sake of our values, our
health, and the future of our society.

Thank you.

Jie as Speaker 2

Good [morning/afternoon/evening], honorable judges, esteemed

opponents, and respected audience,

As the second speaker of the Anti-abortion team, I stand here to

strengthen the foundation laid by my teammate and address the arguments
that the opposition might raise in favor of abortion legalization. My speech
will focus on reinforcing the sanctity of life, debunking the opposition's claims
about women's rights and autonomy, and highlighting the dangerous
precedent that abortion legalization sets for our society.
1. The Right to Life: A Non-Negotiable Principle

Our first speaker has eloquently established that life begins at conception
and that every unborn child holds the right to life. The opposition may argue
that the fetus is not a "person" yet and therefore does not have rights
comparable to those of the mother. Let me make this clear: the essence of
human rights is that they are universal, inalienable, and inviolable.
These rights are not contingent on one's size, stage of development, or level
of independence.

The opposition might claim that a fetus is dependent on the mother and
therefore not a separate being. To this, I say: dependency does not
diminish humanity. A newborn baby is entirely dependent on its parents
for survival, yet no one would question its right to live. If we begin to assign
value to life based on autonomy or functionality, we are walking a dangerous
path where the worth of individuals is measured by their utility, not their
inherent dignity.

2. Rebuttal: Women’s Rights and Bodily Autonomy

The opposition will undoubtedly argue that abortion is about protecting

women’s rights and their bodily autonomy. Let us acknowledge that a
woman’s rights are important—but they are not absolute. When another life
is at stake, rights must be balanced.

Abortion is not solely a matter of a woman’s body; it involves another body,

another life. The fetus is a distinct human being, with its own DNA,
heartbeat, and potential. To prioritize a woman’s autonomy to the extent that
it permits the termination of another human life is an extreme and morally
indefensible position.

Furthermore, true empowerment for women means providing them with

resources and support during pregnancy, not offering abortion as the default
solution. Let us not forget that many women seek abortions due to
socioeconomic pressures or lack of support. Instead of legalizing abortion, let
us focus on addressing these root causes—through better healthcare,
counseling, education, and adoption services.

3. Rebuttal: Cases of Rape or Danger to the Mother

The opposition may attempt to evoke the most emotionally charged cases,
such as pregnancies resulting from rape or those endangering the life of the
mother. While these situations are undeniably tragic, they are also rare.
Legalizing abortion across the board because of these exceptional cases is
like legalizing theft because someone stole out of hunger. Difficult cases
demand compassionate solutions, not sweeping policies that disregard the
value of life.

In cases of rape, we must provide the woman with extensive support—

psychological, medical, and legal—without punishing the innocent child for
the crime of its father. And in cases where the mother’s life is at risk, modern
medicine often allows us to prioritize saving both lives, rather than framing it
as an either-or situation.

4. Rebuttal: Unsafe Abortions

The opposition might also argue that legalizing abortion will reduce the
number of unsafe, back-alley abortions. But this argument rests on the
assumption that we must legalize harmful practices simply because they
occur illegally. Should we legalize drug use because illegal drugs harm
people? The solution is not to legalize abortion but to ensure that women
receive the care, education, and resources they need to avoid unwanted
pregnancies in the first place.

Moreover, legalizing abortion does not eliminate harm—it institutionalizes it.

Abortion is always harmful because it ends a life. We must ask ourselves: is it
ethical to solve one form of harm by legalizing another, even greater harm?

5. Rebuttal: The “My Body, My Choice” Argument

The opposition will likely emphasize the slogan “my body, my choice.” But let
us dissect this claim. Does autonomy grant us the right to harm others? No.
Rights come with responsibilities. A woman’s choice ends when it infringes
upon the rights of another human being—in this case, the unborn child.

Additionally, the very act of conceiving a child comes with responsibilities.

Pregnancy is not an unexpected consequence of choices made—it is a
natural process. As a society, we must foster a sense of accountability rather
than promote a culture of escapism where life is discarded when it is
inconvenient.
6. Abortion Harms Society

Finally, let us not ignore the broader implications of legalizing abortion. When
society permits the deliberate termination of life, it erodes the value we
place on human dignity. If we dehumanize the unborn today, what stops us
from dehumanizing other vulnerable groups tomorrow?

Legalizing abortion creates a slippery slope where the sanctity of life

becomes negotiable. It teaches future generations that life’s value is
subjective, determined by convenience or circumstance. Is this the legacy we
want to leave behind?

7. Closing Statement

In conclusion, honorable judges, our stance against abortion is rooted in a

commitment to life, dignity, and responsibility. We reject the arguments of
the opposition that trivialize the profound ethical, emotional, and societal
implications of abortion.

Instead of promoting the legalization of abortion, let us advocate for

solutions that protect both mother and child. Let us work toward a society
that values life in all its forms, that supports women through challenges, and
that upholds the rights of the most vulnerable among us.

Thank you.

Marco as Speaker 3

Good evening honorable judges, esteemed opponents, and

respected audience,

As the third speaker of the Anti-Abortion team, my role is to address the

rebuttals brought forward by the opposition and consolidate the arguments
made by our team. I will demonstrate why our stance, grounded in the
defense of life and human dignity, is the most ethical, logical, and just
position. Let us review, counter, and ultimately show why the Anti-Abortion
team must prevail in this debate.
1. Rebuttals to the Opposition's Arguments

The opposition has presented several points in favor of abortion, but each of
these arguments falls short when we examine them closely. Let me address
their main claims.

a. "Abortion is about women's rights and bodily autonomy."

The opposition continues to emphasize bodily autonomy as the cornerstone

of their argument. However, as my colleague has explained, autonomy is not
absolute—it is limited by the rights of others. When a new human life is
formed, that life holds its own rights, independent of the mother’s. The claim
“my body, my choice” fails to recognize that the fetus is not merely a part of
the woman’s body—it is a distinct and developing human being.

Moreover, true empowerment for women comes from addressing the

systemic causes of unplanned pregnancies—poverty, lack of education, and
inadequate healthcare—not from promoting abortion as the ultimate
solution. Legalizing abortion reduces women’s choices to a quick fix, rather
than empowering them to make informed and supported decisions.

b. "Legalizing abortion prevents unsafe, illegal procedures."

The opposition suggests that legalizing abortion reduces harm, but this
argument is flawed. The solution to unsafe abortions is not to legalize the
harm but to invest in better healthcare, comprehensive sex education, and
access to contraception. Let us not solve a tragedy by creating another.
Abortion itself is harmful, not only to the unborn child but also to the physical
and psychological well-being of many women who undergo it.

c. "Abortion is justified in extreme cases, such as rape or danger to

the mother."

These situations are indeed tragic and deserve compassion and support.
However, they represent a small fraction of abortion cases and should not
dictate policy for the majority. Even in these difficult circumstances, abortion
is not the solution. Support for the mother, alternatives like adoption, and
advancements in medical care can address these issues without resorting to
the termination of life.

Furthermore, using rare cases to justify widespread legalization opens the

door to abuse and trivialization of abortion as a mere convenience.

d. "Abortion is necessary to prevent overpopulation or poverty."

The opposition might argue that abortion helps control population growth or
addresses economic hardship. However, this argument reduces human life to
a statistic. No one’s existence should be deemed expendable due to financial
difficulties or societal strain. The solution to poverty is economic reform,
better social services, and stronger community support—not the elimination
of innocent lives.

2. Consolidating Our Team’s Case

Now, let me summarize why our team stands firmly against the legalization
of abortion.

a. The Right to Life is Fundamental and Non-Negotiable.

Life begins at conception, and every human being, regardless of their stage
of development, deserves protection. To legalize abortion is to devalue
human life and deny the unborn their basic right to exist. This is a dangerous
precedent that undermines the foundation of human rights.

b. Legalizing Abortion Harms Women and Society.

Abortion is not a solution; it is a symptom of deeper societal issues. Instead
of addressing the root causes of unplanned pregnancies, it offers a
superficial and harmful "solution." Women deserve better than a choice
between ending a life and enduring hardship. By legalizing abortion, society
fails to provide real support and instead perpetuates a culture of
disposability.

c. Ethical and Moral Responsibility to Protect the Most Vulnerable.

As a society, we are judged by how we treat the most vulnerable among us.
The unborn child is the most defenseless member of our society, and it is our
moral duty to protect them. Abortion is not just a medical procedure; it is the
deliberate ending of a life. By rejecting abortion, we uphold the principles of
justice, compassion, and responsibility.

3. Why the Anti-Abortion Side Should Win

The opposition's case ultimately falls short because it prioritizes convenience

and autonomy over the sanctity of life. In this debate, the Anti-Abortion team
has consistently shown that:

 The fetus is a human life deserving protection, regardless of

dependency or development.
  Abortion is harmful—to the child, to the mother, and to society as a
whole.

 Alternatives exist to abortion, including adoption, education,

healthcare reform, and support systems that address the root causes
of unplanned pregnancies.

Legalizing abortion undermines the fundamental values of our society. It

teaches us to prioritize the easy way out over responsibility, to discard life
when it is inconvenient, and to ignore the long-term consequences of our
decisions.

Honorable judges, our case is not just about winning a debate—it is about
standing for the inherent dignity of every human being. The Anti-Abortion
team has made it clear that life is precious, that women deserve better
solutions, and that society must uphold its moral responsibility to protect the
vulnerable. Let us build a future where every life is valued, every woman is
supported, and every child is given the chance to live.

Thank you.