The United States District Court for the Central District of California encourages settlement of civil litigation through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes before trial. Parties are required to participate in ADR unless exempted, and must discuss their preferences for mediation in their Joint 26(f) Report. The court will provide a referral to ADR during the initial scheduling conference.
The United States District Court for the Central District of California encourages settlement of civil litigation through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes before trial. Parties are required to participate in ADR unless exempted, and must discuss their preferences for mediation in their Joint 26(f) Report. The court will provide a referral to ADR during the initial scheduling conference.
Original Description:
ASIM NAJEE ASMAR BEY, ESTATE & TRUST
Vs.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM
The United States District Court for the Central District of California encourages settlement of civil litigation through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes before trial. Parties are required to participate in ADR unless exempted, and must discuss their preferences for mediation in their Joint 26(f) Report. The court will provide a referral to ADR during the initial scheduling conference.
The United States District Court for the Central District of California encourages settlement of civil litigation through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes before trial. Parties are required to participate in ADR unless exempted, and must discuss their preferences for mediation in their Joint 26(f) Report. The court will provide a referral to ADR during the initial scheduling conference.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(CASE NUMBER:
ASIM NAJEE ASMAR BEY See gee
Plaintifi(s)
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ef a
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF
Defendant(s) COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM.
NOTICE TO PARTIES:
tis the policy of this Court to encourage settlement of civil litigation when such is in the
best interest of the parties. The Court favors any reasonable means, including alternative
dispute resolution (ADR), to accomplish this goal. See L.R. 16-15. Unless exempted by the
trial judge, parties in all civil cases must participate in an ADR process before trial. See LR.
16-15.1.
The district judge to whom the above-referenced case has been assigned is participating in
an ADR Program that presumptively directs this case to either the Court Mediation Panel or to
private mediation. See General Order No. 11-10, §5. For more information about the Mediation
Panel, visit the Court website, www.cacd.uscourts.gov, under “ADR.”
Pursuant to L.R. 26-1(c), counsel are directed to furnish and discuss with their clients the
attached ADR Notice To Parties before the conference of the parties mandated by Fed.R.Civ.P.
26(f). Based upon the consultation with their clients and discussion with opposing counsel,
counsel must indicate the following in their Joint 26(f) Report: 1) whether the case is best
suited for mediation with a neutral from the Court Mediation Panel or private mediation; and 2)
when the mediation should occur. See L.R. 26-1(c).
At the initial scheduling conference, counsel should be fully prepared to discuss their
preference for referral to the Court Mediation Panel or to private mediation and when the
mediation should occur. The Court will enter an Order/Referral to ADR at or around the time
of the scheduling conference.
Clerk, U.S. District Court
By i
Date Deputy Clerk
DROS ‘NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM
Gmail -Gmail Natalie Calkins, your Department and/or Agency is advised that the Bonding and/or Bond/s info, data or reports in total ARE NO LONGER EXEMPT
Amended Complaint ORIGINALLY FILED 11/19/2024, YET INTENTIONALLY BLOCKED BY MARK B BUSBY - CV 24 5588 AMO HOWELL v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDONG INC.
UPS Confirmed Signature Delivery of AFFIDAVIT OF TREASON BY CITY OF SAINT PETERSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT D-U-N-S® NUMBER: 787343615, Assistant Chief David Gerardo Et Al, Respondents
JUDICIAL NOTICE: NOTICE UNDER 18 U.S. CODE § 1505 OBSTRUCTION OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE DEPARTMENTS, AGENCIES, AND COMMITTEES WITH DEMAND CLAIM BE MADE WITH COMMERCIAL BONDING COMPANY AGAINST PUBLIC HAZARD / DAMAGE COMMITTED BY JUDGE ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN [CV24 5588 AMO]