0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views4 pages

Government of Russia

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 4

1

Political Analysis Assignment:

Government of Russia

??? ???

Saint Peter’s University

Perspectives on Politics

Dr. ??? ???

November 26, 2024


2

​ Every nation in the world seeks to be efficient & civilized. For this, you of course need
government. All modern nations of course have adopted a government, often however varying in
their specific structures and implications of power. Everyone has a slightly different opinion on
what is a perfect government. Some advocate for tighter government power & control, while
others hold more individualistic ideas, rather weary of extensive government ideas. Especially in
countries where the general populous is given freedom of speech as well as some say over their
leadership, governing is an extensively debated & ratiocinated matter. One such instance is
Russia.
Early Russia was founded in 862. When starting out, Russia employed a feudalistic
political and economic structure. This structure, while imperfect, aided them through the major
hardships of the second millennium. Russia seemed to stay an outlier to the other successful
European nations. While the nomadic European nations who would go on to conquer other
nations, they would very often take up their lifestyles due to necessity. However, Russia, was a
sore exception. This was because of how Russia was fundamentally structured. Russia had an
abundance of peasants to supply the princes, like most states. Though, when a period of
instability came for the working class, most countries did not react well for the peasants.
However, Russia began paying the peasants for their labor, a foreign concept. This began the root
of the monarchy that Russia would thrive on; one built on & utterly dependent on the labor of the
lowest class in order to appease the elites.
Following reform in the late 20th century when the Russian Federation emerged, modern
Russia is a proclaimed presidential, federal democracy. However, it is more a semi-presidential
state rather than presidential, as there are partially parliamentary systems in place. The president
would now serve six year terms, in which he would serve as the head of state as well as
commander of chief. The president would remain dominant, with the prime minister right below
him, who serves as the head of government. Similar to the United States, Russia also employs a
thee branch system. There is the Judicial branch, which is primarily comprised of the
Constitutional Court, Supreme Court, and lower federal courts. There is the Executive branch in
which the president & prime minister serve. There is also a Legislative branch. Also like the
United States, there is a multi-party system in place for elections, however, there is one dominant
party. While this reform was structurally fact, Russia remains reminiscent of its ways. For
example, Since the Soviet Union fell, Russia has struggled to employ a new political system,
seeing as they just exited a seventy five year period of Soviet reign. In one implication of this,
legislative and executive leaders had polarizing views of Russia's political future and how they
should pursue it. This ensued a conflict in 1993, when President Boris Yeltsin authorized military
force to advance against the parliament, calling for new legislative elections. As time passes,
Russia only embodies a more absolute political ideology; the ruling man is put into a position of
absolute power, above the law and any accountability. Also, Russia still has a major conflict of
interest throughout its hierarchy, which only seems to devolve. Due to the systems in place
which reward Russian governors who appease the central government with tax exemptions,
leaders are inclined to squeeze the aristocracy dry; working the laborers to the bone and acting
mostly in self interest. As long as they managed to make meets end for the central government,
there was no limit to their demands of the working class. This corruption only increases as you
go up in Russian hierarchy, seeing as the fruits for the leader only increase. This is a common
them in Russia, old and new; the economical ambitions of the Russian state, who are
increasingly exempt, falls on the general peasantry to realize. Much of this system is thanks to
Peter The Great. His great reform had set up intense punishment for any peasant to flee, as well
3

as for any leaders who allowed too free a reign for the peasants. This bound Russian hierarchy
into the centralized government, in which no one would dare face the repercussions of stepping
out of line.
While Russia seems to seek change, there is evidently a ways to go. In 1993, the new
constitution did certainly resolve many issues and contradictions regarding the decentralization
under the Russian Republic 1978 constitution of the. Most of these solutions favored
concentration of power to the central government. However, this type of change only reinforces
the stigmatized and lopsided structure which Russia has been living on. Currently, the President
of Russia, Vladimir Putin is following interests which are hard to call a step in the right
direction. Federation Council officials have went on record criticizing the State for its lack of
coverage regarding regional interests as much as they should be. Vladimir Shumeyko, the
speaker of the Federation Council in 1995 went on to criticize the electoral system for
overlooking Russia receiving imbalance representation varying by regions. One federal politician
expressed that such misdemeanor pipelined discontent among parliament and politicians. One
implication which has remained in Russia is its extreme censorship. Regional reporters who
would attempt to cover the corruption of governers and such leaders, most often were killed for
their efforts. This was a practice about as old as corruption itself among the Russian government.
However, Peter the Great’s reform in the 20th century was to mend this practice among others.
Alas, the phenomenon continues, as in the 2010s reporters are continually murdered for their
attempts.
Following his come up to presidency, Putin is extensively pursuing foreign affairs as well
as militarization. While the largest country in the world acts in order to further their land, the
current land suffers need of reform, and a rebalance of responsibility & security. Since taking
office in 2000, Putin has utilized the Russian presidential system to its fullest, being re-elected
for four more six year terms, and counting. Putin has cultivated his “United Russia” political
party, which has remained extremely dominant since founding. While his presidency has solved
some of Russia’s issues, this sovereign party brews the issue of a lack of competition. With
minimal trouble being elected, Putin is in a position of extensive power of little question which
should be alarming to Russian politicians.
While Russia proves to be in a favorable state compared to some decades prior, there is
evidently much to be desired. Russia could certainly continue to operate has it has been, and
likely without issue. However, I believe if Russia seeks to be a genuine democracy, leadership
must be reevaluated in order to reform Russia into a nation with proper checks and balances in
order to adequately spread influence and maintain a unity which is founded in mutual interest
and security.
4

References

Miate, L. (2023 October 12). The Reforms of Peter the Great. World History Encyclopedia.

Retrieved November 21, 2024, from

https://www.worldhistory.org/article/2304/the-reforms-of-peter-the-great/

Politics of Russia. (2024, October 20). Wikipedia. Retrieved November 21, 2024, from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Russia#:~:text=Executive%20branch,-Main%2

0office-holders&text=The%201993%20constitution%20created%20a,in%20the%20Fren

ch%20Fifth%20Republic.

You might also like