0% found this document useful (0 votes)
0 views19 pages

03(3)_-_Acceptance

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 19

Formation of contract I

—— Acceptance
Objectives

01 Acceptance

02 Commuicaiton of Acceptance
01 Acceptance

Definition

Acceptance must be an unqualified agreement to all the terms of


the offer.

'A positive act by a person to whom an offer has been made


which, if unconditional, brings a binding contract into effect.'
01 Acceptance

Consequence

The contract comes into effect once the offeree has accepted the
terms presented to them. This is the point of no return.
After acceptance, the offeror cannot withdraw their offer and both
parties will be bound by the terms that they have agreed.
01 Acceptance
Key point
(a) Acceptance may be by express words, by action or inferred
from conduct.
Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co 1877
The facts: For many years the claimant supplied coal to the
defendant. He suggested that they should enter into a
written agreement and the defendant's agent sent a draft to
him for consideration. The parties applied to their dealings
the terms of the draft agreement, but they never signed a
final version. The claimant later denied that there was any
agreement between him and the defendant.
Decision: The conduct of the parties was only explicable on
the assumption that they both agreed to the terms of the
draft.
01 Acceptance

(b) Acceptance must be unqualified agreement to the terms of


the offer.
(c) A purported acceptance which introduces any new terms is a
counter-offer, which has the effect of terminating the original
offer.
(d) Acceptance is generally not effective until communicated to
the offeror.
(e) Silence of the offeree is not an acceptance.
01 Acceptance

Felthouse v Bindley 1862


The facts: The claimant wrote to his nephew offering to buy
the nephew's horse, adding 'If I hear no more about him, I
consider the horse mine'. The nephew intended to accept his
uncle's offer but did not reply.
He instructed the defendant, an auctioneer, not to sell the
horse. Owing to a misunderstanding the horse was sold to
someone else. The uncle sued the auctioneer.
Decision: The action failed. The claimant had no title to the
horse.
01 Acceptance
(f) Acceptance 'subject to contract': Acceptance 'subject to
contract' means that the offeree is agreeable to the terms of the
offer but proposes that the parties should negotiate a formal
contract. eg:sale of land in England
Neither party is bound until the formal contract is signed.

(g) Letters of intent: an indication by one party to another that


they may place a contract with them.
01 Acceptance
(h) Cross-offers
If two offers, identical in terms, cross in the post, there is no
contract.
For example, if A offers to sell their car to B for ₤1,000 and B
offers to buy A's car for ₤1,000, there is no contract, because
there is no acceptance.
02 Commuicaiton of Acceptance

The general rule is that acceptance must be communicated to the


offeror and that it is not effective (and hence there is no contract)
until this has been done.

However, this rule does not apply in all cases.


02 Commuicaiton of Acceptance
Prescribed mode of communication

The offeror may call for communication of acceptance by


specified means.
Communication of acceptance by some other means equally
expeditious generally constitutes a valid acceptance unless
specified otherwise. This would probably apply also to
acceptance by fax machine or email.
The offeror would have to use very precise wording if a
specified means of communication is to be treated as mandatory.
02 Commuicaiton of Acceptance
Unilateral offer
A unilateral offer is one where one party promises something in
return for some action on the part of another party. In relation to
unilateral offers, revocation is not permissible once the offeree has
started performing the task requested.

Reward cases are examples of such unilateral promises.


The offeror may dispense with the need for communication of
acceptance. Such a waiver may be express or may be inferred from
the circumstances. In Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1893, it
was held that it was sufficient for the claimant to act on the offer
without notifying her acceptance of it.
02 Commuicaiton of Acceptance
Postal rules
When the postal rules apply acceptance is completed as soon as the
letter has been posted, even though it may be delayed or even lost
altogether in the post.

• The use of the post is within the contemplation of both the parties
• Letter must be properly addressed and stamped
• If the offer stipulates a particular mode of communication, the
postal rule may not apply.
02 Commuicaiton of Acceptance
Adams v Lindsell 1818
The facts: The defendants made an offer by letter to the
claimant on 2 September 1817 requiring an answer 'in course
of post'. It reached the claimants on 5 September; they
immediately posted a letter of acceptance, which reached
the defendants on 9 September. The defendants could have
expected a reply by 7 September, and they assumed that the
absence of a reply within the expected period indicated
nonacceptance and sold the goods to another buyer on 8
September.
Decision: The acceptance was made 'in course of post' (no
time limit was imposed) and was effective when posted on 5
September.
02 Commuicaiton of Acceptance
Collateral contracts
A collateral contract is a contract where consideration is provided
by the making of another contract. There is a contract despite the
absence of direct communication between them.

For example, if there are two separate contracts, one between A


and B and one between A and C, on terms which involve some
concerted action between B and C, there may be a contract
between B and C.
02 Commuicaiton of Acceptance
Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd 1951
The facts: The defendants gave assurances to the claimants
that their paint would be satisfactory and durable if used to
repaint the claimant's pier. The claimants in their contract
with X for the repainting of the pier specified that X should
use this paint. The paint proved very unsatisfactory. The
claimants sued the defendants for breach of undertaking.
The defendants argued that there was no contract between
the claimants and themselves.
Decision: The contract between the claimants and X
requiring the use of the defendant's paint was the
consideration for a contract between the claimants and the
defendant.
Example Question
Which Two of the following statements describe the rules on
acceptance of an offer ?
A. Once an offer has been accepted a contract comes into
existence
B. Acceptance can be inferred from the conduct of the parties
C. Acceptance only takes place once it has been communicated to
the offeror
D. A counter-offer may constitute acceptance
Answer
A. Once an offer has been accepted a contract comes into
existence
B. Acceptance can be inferred from the conduct of the parties
Thank You
感谢您选择高顿网校 本节结束!

http://www.gaodun.com

You might also like