Module-4 Notes -Selection and Interview Strategy
Module-4 Notes -Selection and Interview Strategy
STRUCTURED INTERVIEW:
A structured interview involves asking a fixed set of questions in the same format and order
to all candidates attending the interview.
These interviews may begin just like how a traditional interview does but may focus more
on a fixed set of questions rather than specific experience-based questions.
The responses of candidates are recorded and graded against a suitable scoring system.
Asking the same set of questions in the same order helps the recruiter collect similar
information from candidates in a uniform context and thus grade them in an unbiased
manner.
Structured formats, as discussed above, is based purely on a predetermined set of questions
in a specific order and format. On the other hand, an unstructured interview is spontaneous
and conversational in nature. While this is a time-tested and traditional interviewing
method, it is not very useful for comparing the performance of candidates.
SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEW
A semi-structured interview combines the best of both interviewing formats.
It uses the organised format of a structured question list to evaluate candidates equally but
also adds a human touch via a set of questions that are not predetermined.
Most interviews conducted by companies are examples of semi-structured interviews.
4. Candidates are scheduled for individual in-person interviews with the hiring
manager/selection committee, preceded by a visit to the HR department to complete a
formal job application.
6. Candidates are scheduled for follow-up interviews and/or testing and other selection
requirements. Subsequent to this step in the process would be a narrowing down of
candidates for the determination of a hiring decision.
Panel interview refers to a type of interview which includes one applicant and several
interviewers, often representatives of different departments within a company like the hiring
manager and a member of the human resource recruitment team.
There are a few reasons an employer may use a group interview instead of a one-on-one
meeting. Depending on their goals, employers might decide to conduct a group interview with
several candidates or a panel interview with one candidate and several interviewers.
Group interviews offer several unique advantages to other interview formats. Therefore, if your
organization utilize group interviews with these advantages in mind, you’re most likely to find
them effective.
If you have advance notice of the interview, make sure to review the job description
and do a bit of research on the company.
2. Prepare in Advance
Prepare for a phone interview just as you would for a regular in-person interview.
Compile a list of your strengths and weaknesses, as well as a list of answers to typical
phone interview questions. In addition, have a list of questions ready to ask the
interviewer.
Take the time to match your qualifications to the job description so that you can speak
to why you're a strong candidate for the position. Review your resume as well. Know
the dates when you held each of your previous jobs, and what your responsibilities
were.
You should feel comfortable and ready to discuss your background and skills
confidently during a phone conversation. Have a copy of your resume nearby, so that
you can refer to it during the interview. Also have a copy of the job posting and a copy
of your cover letter if you sent one.
3. Video Interview
A video interview is a job interview that takes place remotely and uses video technology
as the communication medium.
For example, in the early stages, the hiring manager might pose a set of questions and
ask job seekers to record their responses in a video .
2. Screen Size
Currently, there are several viable device options for video communication: laptops, tablets,
and smart phones. The smaller the device, the smaller the screen, and this is an important
element to think about in terms of your interaction as both a sender and a receiver. If you
are using a small device such as a smartphone, less of your immediate area will be in view,
and you will be the main focus. For the interviewee, this may not be an issue. For example,
I have participated in many video calls using my smartphone positioned at shoulder height
on my desk to communicate and my laptop available to have information readily accessible,
such as my resume or a website for reference. On the employer side, the use of a
Smartphone may be problematic if the plan is to have multiple interviewers on the call. The
phone will have to be set back a fair distance for everyone to be on-screen, and the
interviewers may not only appear small and far away but voices may not carry as well in
order to reach the microphone on the
Device, and the interviewee may find it difficult to hear everyone. A better option for
multiple interviewers is a laptop that has a sufficiently large screen to capture every
participant both visually and audibly.
3. Screen Placement
Related to the consideration of device screen size is screen placement. Ideally, each person
should be visible from the upper body/shoulder level. In most cases, there is no need for
either the interviewee or the interviewer(s) to have to be visible on-screen from head to toe.
In fact, positioning the screen in a manner that allows a participant's entire body to be in
view may take the focus off what is being said as well as facial expressions. For example,
I once participated in a videoconference call in which all the participants were in a large
room. Not only were they seated far apart from each other, their screen was placed far away
so that they could all appear full body on the screen. From the receiver's perspective, it was
challenging for me to hear what on-screen was talking at various points on the call. I had
4. Lighting
The fluorescent overhead lighting that is typical among most work environments is the least
video friendly type of lighting, as it can create a harsh washed out on screen appearance of
the participants. Very few people are able to maintain a healthy and vibrant appearance
under the least video-friendly type of lighting, as it can create a harsh, washed out on-screen
appearance fluorescent lights. A change in lighting can breathe life back into an on-screen
appearance. Try to avoid a stark white background, which can causes glare. If having a
solid white background wall is unavoidable, then switching fluorescent light for soft lamp
lighting should also alleviate the glare factor. Again, it is advisable to do a practice video
call internally before conducting the actual interviews to determine what elements for more
visually appealing lighting.
5. Personal Appearance
Each participant should be prepared to make just as professional of an impact on a vide
Interview as they would expect to make during an in-person interview. Businessappropriate
attire is essential for both the interviewer(s) and the interviewee. This typically translates a
suit or a jacket and tailored pants or skirt, with a button-down shirt or business-appropriate
blouse underneath the jacket. Of course, the organizational culture will impact the norm for
business attire among interviewers but should always be neat and professional. You may
be thinking, wait a minute, why does appearance matter from the waist down if only the
head and shoulders or upper body will be visible onscreen? Consider the possibility of
having move from the table or desk on-screen during the video interview. What if you need
to get to locate a file folder, book, or some other resource, or attend to an unscripted need
while you are on the call, and you are dressed in a suit jacket, jeans, and sneakers? This
may soul silly, but it actually happens more often than you might think, as there is always
the possible that you may need to move around and away from your on-screen “set” during
the video cal. As an interviewer, you want to be taken seriously and give a job candidate
the impression de you are a respected and professional representative of the organization.
As an interview you want to make as strong of a first impression as possible, that you are
a well-organised and prepared professional, focused and detail oriented, and ready to step
into the opportunity and succeed.
6. Body Language
It is probably stating the obvious that body language, also referred to as nonverbal
communication, is critical to participating in a video interview. Mastering on screen body
7. Background Distractors
A neutral setting with minimal distractors is ideal for the focus to remain on the verbal
exchange between the interviewer(s) and interviewee during a video call. A setting in a
cluttered, messy, high-traffic, and/or noisy area will diminish the clarity and attention paid
to the dialogue. This can negatively impact both sides of the interview experience, as
participants may lose their train of thought, get flustered, or forget key information they
had intended to convey.
STRUCTURED INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
Question #1: Have you ever had a difficult customer at the bar? (Yes/No)
If yes, proceed with Question #2: Can you give me an example of a difficult customer you had
to take care of on your shift? What was the issue, and how did you handle it?
Question #1: Do you have experience with making tropical specialty drinks? (Yes/No) If yes,
proceed with Question #2: Can you describe your process for making a mai tai?
Open-ended and closed-ended questions are both valuable to the interview process but are not
necessarily interchangeable, and neither should be relied on exclusively in the question design.
Both types of questions can be built into the interview structure to enable the interviewer to
obtain the most-detailed information needed from each interviewee in a clear, non
overwhelming, and logical manner.
Background/Chronology Questions
Background/chronology-based questions are the most basic type of Background/ question and
relatively self-explanatory. These questions are designed to Chronology Question obtain
additional information and/or validation about an interviewee's background pertaining to
anything supplied on his or her resume and job application.
An interview question designed to obtain validation and/or ad about candidates qualifications
as provided by his or her resume and job application.
Background questions can be integrated in a way that additional information about candidate's
career path and sequence of events in terms of job movement, education, and other professional
endeavors. Going back to qualifications as provided the example of the bartender job, consider
the following background chronology interview question:
Question #1:
From your resume, it appears that you worked for two employers at the same time, a hotel and
a conference center, during the date range of May through August 2015. Were these both full-
time jobs, part-time jobs, or a combination of full-and part-time? Could you provide
clarification of your employment around this time frame?
Of all the types of questions, background/chronology interview questions are perhaps the best
questions to ask during a pre-screening phone interview, essentially to confirm all the details
about a candidate's qualifications and back story prior to coordinating an in-person interview.
These are not the questions to spend an inordinate amount of time on in a face-to-face
individual or group interview session when you really need to ask the more critical and
impactful job knowledge, behavioral, and situational questions. It can also be a good idea for
a recruiter and/or HR representative to ask background questions as an initial step so they ma
provide a comprehensive candidate packet with any ambiguities clarified to whomever will be
conducting follow-up interviews.
Question #1: What are the most common types of craft beers currently requested by bar
customers?
Question #2: What is the appropriate glassware in which to serve the following types of beers:
wheat beers, stouts, lagers, IPAs, and pilsners?
Job knowledge questions can also be valuable for group interviews and structured in such a
way that one interviewer opens up a new topic with the simpler question, and the next
interviewer with the more complex question. This is where a pre interview meeting of all the
interviewers may be useful to organize all the questions, their sequence, and which interviewers
will ask certain questions.
Behavior-Based/Experiential Questions
Behavior-based/experiential interview questions are strategically designed to elicit a response
from interviewees that includes an example Experiential Question: of how they behaved or
performed in a specific past situation that is directly related to the job for which they have
applied. The premise designed to determine the likelihood of a behind behavior based or
experiential interview questions is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. A
job candidate is performance on the job likely to engage in a similar behavior or perform in a
similar manner in based on his or her past a future job as they did in a past job. Asking
interviewees to articulate behavior/performance, their actual experience in a particular situation
and how they behaved in their job role in that context can yield valuable insight into critically
important performance dimensions. Let's take a look at examples of behavior-based interview
questions for several different jobs:
The key to success with behavior-based interview questions is for the interviewers to have an
understanding of the behaviors that would be considered desired and acceptable for a specific
job, as well as those behaviors that would be considered red flags and potentially unacceptable.
Again, this is where a preinterview meeting with the recruiter/HR representative and hiring
manager to discuss performance expectations that would be provided to the interviewers
involved would be a valuable use of time.
Situation-Based Question:
Situation-based questions are nearly identical to behavior-based questions in that they are
designed to obtain information from candidates about how they would behave or perform
in a specific job- question designed to related situation. The key differentiating factor in
using these two types of questions is whether or not candidates have real examples
performance on the job based on his or her from their past experience they are able to share.
If the candidate is response to a entry-level, for example, or does not have specific past
experience in a particular situation to refer to, then a situation-based question can be
hypothetical job scenario a reasonable alternative to a behavior-based question.
A situation- based interview question is structured to pose a hypothetical scenario relevant
to the job and ask the interviewee to describe how he or she would handle or perform in
that situation Rather than wording the question as "Tell me about a time in which you
effectively handled an irate customer and successfully resolved his or her issue," a situation-
based question may be worded as "Imagine you are confronted with an angry customer who
bought an expensive product that broke after 2 days of use. How would you create a positive
customer experience in which you are able to calm him or her down and take care of the
issue to the customer's satisfaction?" It is likely that interviewees will have a similar
behavioral response to a hypothetical scenario in a situation-based question as they would
have if they had an actual personal experience to share.
Interview question content, format, and sequence should be predetermined by the recruiter
and/or HR representative involved in the selection process, as well as the hiring manager
and any other key contributors or stakeholders such as a search committee, external
consultant, or search firm. The questions should be constructed based on the qualification
requirements, performance dimensions, and essential job tasks and responsibilities as stated
in the job description, which hopefully has been developed and validated following a
thorough job analysis.
1. Halo Effect
The tendency to assume that a person possesses multiple positive characteristics based on
the observation of one perceived desirable or appealing attribute. Have you ever met a new
person, someone you knew little to nothing about, and noticed something about him or her
that you would typically perceive in a positive manner? Perhaps that positive attribute was
2. Contrast Error
The order in which the candidates are interviewed may affect the interviewers' initial
impressions and perceptions of them. For example, a candidate whose interview is just
average may be perceived much more favorably if he or she is interviewed after a candidate
who interviewed poorly.
Conversely, a candidate who is interviewed immediately after a stellar, amazing candidate
may come across as unimpressive or inadequate by comparison, even though that individual
is well-qualified and presented appropriately in the interview.
This phenomenon is called contrast error, or contrast effect, and is a common issue because
we as humans like to categorize, compare, rank, and perform other cognitive processes that
help us make sense of the information and surroundings with which we are presented.
It can challenge to focus solely on the information presently in front of us without factoring
in or comparing any information or influences that were previously provided to us.
3. Inappropriate Substitutes
The tendency to mistakenly exchange one behaviour for another even though they are not
similar or relevant to one another. This is a fascinating phenomenon, though not as
commonly known or referred to as often some of the other errors in rater judgment.
Inappropriate substitutes occurs when a person mentally exchanges one behavior for
another even though they are not similar or relevant to one another.
The substitution may be made in an effort to depict someone in a positive or negative light.
In the context of an interview, a candidate may not demonstrate adequate knowledge
required to effectively perform the job they are not send but shares how much he or she
enjoys baking and tends to bring relevant to one another homemade baked goods such as
muffins and cakes to the office for coworkers to snack on.
Interviewers may like the idea of having someone bring delicious treats into the office for
everyone, and this attribute could overshadow that candidate's lack of job related
Interview evaluation forms are to be completed by the interviewer to rank the candidate's
overall qualifications for the position for which they have applied. Under each heading, the
interviewer should give the candidate a numerical rating and write specific jobrelated
comments in the space provided.
It is a tool for documenting notes during the interview and rating interview resonses to a
strucutured set of questions
Interview questions can also be weighted based on the importance of the tasks and
responsbilities.
2. Millennials prefer shorter hiring process and the use of sophisticated hiring
techniques:
• Several studies in the marketing literature have demonstrated that millenni also
reflected in other spheres of millennials' lives such ity to delay gratifications (11, 12).
These tendencies a as their preference for shorter hiring processes.
• In a case study conducted by KPMG, it was observed that more than one-third of the
400 job applicants found the hiring process excessively long to the point of frustration.
On the one hand, millennials demand a reduction in the length of the hiring process. On
the other hand, the length of the entire recruitment process has increased from an
average of 13 days in 2011 to 23 days millennials experience due to the length of the
hiring in 2015.
• Given the frustration and uneasiness respond process, organizations are trying to
concerns through a host of strategies. First, organizations are using sophisticated
technologies such as applicant tracking systems (ATS) to automate the hiring process.
• ATS offers a range of benefits such as easy job postings, quick filtering capabilities,
time and cost savings, and a broader reach. Technologies such as ATS reduce the manual
effort often consumed in activities such as screening resumes, which in turn helps in
shortening the hiring process. Second, organizations are doing away with traditional
interaction methods such as face-to-face interviews and are taking the help of
technology to screen potential hires.
• Organizations such as Goldman Sachs are replacing the initial rounds of campus
interviews and opting for virtual meetings such as to these Skype interviews. The
adoption of such techniques is a crucial step in the direction of shortening the hiring
process and meeting millennial expectations.
3. Millennials are increasingly focused on corporate culture:
Having deliberated upon the needs and expectations of millennials during recruitment and
selection, we now elaborate needs and expectations. Some of the strategies that organizations
needs and expectations.
Interviewer training is a sound practice for preparing interviewers and ensuring the understand
how they are expected to perform in the role not only accurately and reliably also ethically and
legally. A foundational yet effective interviewer training session may inclusthe following
components:..
INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES:
While interviewing is not always easy, whether it's face to face or through a virtual interview,
there are a few things you can do to universally increase your chances of getting a call back,
and ultimately, scoring an offer.
1. Be positive.
You'll be a more attractive candidate (and coworker!) if you're upbeat and optimistic about
your career outlook. One of the biggest tricks to interviewing is sounding enthusiastic about
the position. Mastering that skill is a big payoff, though-- the interviewer is reassured that
you are interested in the job and that you'll be a good team player.
2. Set goals.
There are many different types of job interviews and numerous different interviewing
techniques.
If you ask HR professionals and experienced recruiters, each of them will have its own
favorite interview technique and interviewer hacks, tips and tricks.
Here are the top 5 interview techniques HR professionals use to choose the right candidate
for the job:
You’ve probably most familiar with the traditional job interview technique - you know, the
one where you ask your candidates about their skills and experiences in order to find out
if they’re a good fit for your open job position.
Traditional interviews come in many shapes and sizes. For example, a traditional interview
can be structured, unstructured or semi-structured. It can also be a one-onone
interview, a panel interview or even a group interview. A traditional interview can be
conducted in the form of a phone screening interview, video interview or a face to face
interview.
The problem with traditional interview technique is that is has been proven ineffective in
certain areas. According to LinkedIn’s report, which surveyed over 9,000 recruiters and
hiring managers, the traditional interviewing technique has many weaknesses.
For example, traditional interview technique is especially bad at assessing soft skills and
understanding candidate weaknesses. It also leaves room for recruitment bias, takes a lot
of time, and relies on asking the right interview questions to get a clear picture of a
candidate.
This is why many HR professionals have started experimenting with innovative, out-
ofthe-box interview techniques.
2. Job simulation
Job simulation (sometimes also called job audition) is the most popular innovative
interview technique. Job simulations are becoming increasingly popular among employers
because they help companies predict if a candidate if a good fit for a role more accurately.
3. Casual interview
4. Virtual interview
In the last few years, we heard a lot about VR (virtual reality) and AR (augmented
reality). These technologies have been announced as the next big thing that will
completely change the way we live - and interview. Using VR and AR, employers can now
engage with candidates in a virtual job interview.
Virtual interview technique was first used at college career fairs to attract the attention of
a younger generation of innovative, tech-savvy talent.
However, the use of this interview technique has quickly evolved way beyond career fairs.
For example, General Mills created a virtual tour of its headquarters
and Deutsche Bahn uses virtual reality to show candidates what it’s like to work at their
company, especially at hard to fill roles such as train conductor and electrician.
Another good example is the use of virtual reality by Jaguar Land Rover. This company
created a virtual reality app that test candidates skills.
The legal and ethical needs that are important in the interview process are essentially
the same as the considerations for the recruitment process and the other practices that
encompass the overall selection strategy.
Again, a structured interview approach is not only more efficient to administer and more
effective in terms of process accuracy and consistency, but it is also amore ethical and
legally minded practice. It is easier for an organization to legally justify a component
or method in a standardized, structured interview compared to an unstructured
interview that may contain inconsistent, ambiguous, and/or subjective elements.
Use of standardized forms and materials, such as a set of interview questions that were
developed using the job description and a weighted rating and evaluation form, are
valuable for legal compliance needs
BEIs are very focused, clinical-type, recorded interviews which can take from 2-2 1/2
hours to complete.
They require working with a candidate to develop a series of "behavioral events." After
each interview, the recording is analyzed for evidence of competencies.
The total process of recording the interview, creating transcripts and analyzing them for
competencies can take up to six hours per interview.
The major step in the BEI interview is to elicit behavioral events. The interviewee is
asked to describe, in detail,
Like: the five or six most important situations he or she has experienced in a specific
job.
The situations should include two or three high points, or major successes, and two
or three low points, or key failures.
"What did you (the interviewee) think, feel, or want to do in the situation?"
How was the person thinking about others (e.g., positively or negatively) or about the
situation (e.g., problem-solving thoughts)?
What did the person want to do - what motivated him or her in the situation (e.g.,
to do something better, to impress the boss)?
"What did you actually do or say?" Here you are interested in the skills that the person
showed.
Trained specialists analyze the BEI transcripts to identify competencies that appear in
the Behavioral Events.
If the goal is to build a competency model, the process must be repeated with 8-12
"star" performers and 8-12 average performers, each providing five or six events.
This means that 80-144 events must be generated and analyzed for each job.
In today's busy, lean organizations, few interviewers have the time or resources for the
level of individual analysis of each candidate using the Behavioral Event Interviewing
methodology.
Step 1. Explanation
Everyone will want to know why he or she is being interviewed. Your explanation might
go something like this:
“This is part of a program which should lead to better selection and training for the job. If
we can identify the competencies needed for a job, we can select people who have those
competencies needed for the job or train job incumbents to develop the necessary
competencies to a fuller extent”.
At this point you should get the permission of the interviewee for you to tape-record the
interview. You can explain it this way:
“With your permission, I would like to record parts of this interview to help me with my
notes. Everything you say will be kept confidential and will not be shared with anyone else
in (interviewee’s organization). But if there is anything you want to say off the record or
don’t want me to record, just let me know and I’ll turn off the tape”.
It is a good idea to break the ice by getting the interviewee talking about what he or she
does in a general way, that is, about what his or her duties and responsibilities are.
“Let’s begin by taking about what your responsibilities are in your job. I really know
nothing about what it takes to be a good (policeman, naval officer, manager, etc.). What do
you do? Where do you work? Whom do you work with? What are your hours? Whom do
you report to? Who reports to you?”
The objective here is to get the interviewee talking in as free and relaxed a way as possible
about his or her job. Sometimes interviewees have difficulty getting started, but most of
them find it easy to talk about their work and they like telling others what they do. It is wise
not to push the behavioral event approach on them too soon; lead into it gradually.
Often in the course of describing their work, interviewees will say things that puzzle you
or that you want clarified. For example, a police captain may say, “Well, I supervise the
lieutenants”. Here he is simply quoting a job description to you and your problem is to find
out what he means. So you say “Could you explain a little more what you mean by
‘supervise’? Do they write reports for you to read? Do they come in to talk with you first
thing in the morning, or when they leave? Do you observe them working with the
patrolmen? What is the chance you would get to know they were doing something wrong
or to give them some direction? It helps most if you can describe an actual case where you
supervised someone”.
Hopefully this questioning about duties will lead to a critical event which you can ask the
interviewee to describe in detail so that you can get a better idea of how the job is done and
what characteristics it takes to do it well. You may say something like:
“To get a better idea of what supervision consists of, can you think of an instance where
you were able to help someone do his or her job better, or keep him or her from making a
mistake? I need an example of just how you operate”.
It is hard to generalize about just how you will hit on the first incident since it should come
up naturally in the course of discussing various responsibilities. But once you have got the
interviewee talking about a particular event, you should push hard for behavioral detail.
“Now let me get the setting straight. Let’s begin at the beginning. Where were you? What
time of day was it? What had you been doing when this came up? What was in your mind?”
You may want to ask what kind of day it was (raining?) or how the interviewee was feeling,
to recreate the whole scenario. Here you become an investigative reporter, pushing to get
clear in your mind just what happened. Asking for time, place and mood often helps the
interviewee recall the episode, since all the person has left in his or her mind usually is
some memory of how it all turned out which he or she told you first anyway. You should
have in mind the following questions as the interviewee begins to tell the story:
Try to get the interviewee to begin at the beginning and take you through the story as it
unfolded. Otherwise you may get confused about what happened and who did what. This
may be difficult because the interviewee will usually start by remembering the outcome of
an event. Just say, “That’s exactly what I had in mind. Now let’s start at the beginning so
that I can understand what happened”. As the interviewee tells you all this, you are learning
things about him or her, and you should ask questions that will verify or doublecheck
inferences you are beginning to draw about his or her competencies. In all questioning,
however, be sure that you are giving the interviewee plenty of reinforcement for what he
or she is telling you. You are not the FBI. You should laugh with the interviewee, tell stories
Your objective is to get the interviewee to tell you little vignettes, scenarios of things that
happened to him or her. Some people need a lot of encouragement and stimulation to really
get into the process of telling a story.
You may find it easy in talking about an event in the area of supervision to move on to an
example of when things didn’t go well:
“That helps me understand much better what supervision involves. Now, can you think of
an instance in which you feel you didn’t carry out supervision as well as you might have?
That will help me also, because it will identify the characteristic one ought to show in
such situations”.
If the interviewee can’t think of one, you can make a few suggestions (“Did you ever have
to fire somebody?” “Did you ever have problems with any of your subordinates?”) and if
the interviewee still blocks (an unusual occurrence!) you can go to some other area (“Well,
can you think of a time when things didn’t go well on the job?”). Again, when the
interviewee comes up with and event, ask first for time, place and setting, and then go into
detail.
In all, it is best to try to get detailed descriptions of three events where the interviewee was
effective and three events where the interviewee was ineffective. but there is nothing
magical about these numbers. The crucial question is whether you are learning what it takes
to do this job well.
Occasionally you will run into someone who blocks when you ask him or her for an
example of something that went particularly well or poorly. The interviewee just can’t seem
to think of anything important. In that case, don’t keep pressing him or her; your main goal
of getting the interviewee to talk about how he or she performs on the job may only be
interfered with as he or she gets more frustrated or annoyed about not being able to do what
you want. Then you should use other approaches to get the interviewee to talk, such as
asking the person to take you through what he or she did yesterday or probing in detail, or
just how he or she goes about supervising someone through an example.
Remember, the goal is to get the interviewee to talk about the way he or she does the job.
Any method of doing that is legitimate.
It is often useful at the end of the interview to ask the interviewee what characteristics he
or she thinks a person ought to have to do his or her job well. This serves the double purpose
of establishing good relations by asking the interviewee’s opinion and also of giving you
some further insight into what he or she thinks is important. For example, if none of the
good incumbents thinks to mention interpersonal skills, you may want to infer that
incumbents in this job can get along without caring much about interpersonal relationships.
After the interview is over it is a good plan to sit down quietly for an hour and summarize
what you have learned. This may include a brief characterization of the person you have
just interviewed. It also helps you define things about which you are still unclear. In other
words, it is a time to make your budding hypotheses explicit so that you can check them in
later interviews. If you have the time, this is the best point to write up the entire interview,
while your memory is still fresh.
SIMULATIONS
A job related activity designed to assess a job candidate's proficiency and ability to
perform specific job task.
It is one of the most valuable methods for witnessing candidate perform actual job tasks
without yet having that individual employed in the job. The hands-on type of simulation
exercise may also be referred to as a work sample assessment, and this is indeed a major
category of simulation exercise
Job simulations are employment tests that ask candidates to perform tasks that they
would perform on the job. By using job simulations, employers can evaluate whether
a job candidate can do the job, rather than guess based on interview answers and
personality questionnaires.
TYPES:
High fidelity :
In general terms, a role play exercise is used to assess your “fit” to the job at hand, by
simulating real life situations, in which either the assessors at the assessment centre or
hired actors take part in the simulation. There are many different types of role play
exercises and these are tailored to specific jobs.
These statements are used to build out a realistic work sample simulation exercise
Communication skills
Professionalism
ASSESSMENT CENTRES
Assessment centers are often used for jobs that are senior level in an organization as
may also be implemented for managerial and non managerial jobs that have complete
performance dimensions and certain elements of criticality, high risk, and/or a high
level of financial responsibility. Because the assessment center is designed to measure
multiple and often complete performance dimensions, an array of exercises will be
developed that target different performance dimensions and behavioral competencies
to form an overall picture.
An assessment center will often use multiple assessors to enable multiple rounds of
exercises to happen simultaneously with all the candidates, which ensures efficiency
the process and having all the candidates move through the entire schedule together.
The assessment center is designed to measure multiple and often complex performance
dimensions, an array of exercises will be developed that target different areas. A
consideration in the development of an assessment center is to determine the most
critical performance identified performance dimensions and their associated behavioral
competencies in as dimensions and behavioral competencies to examine.
The goal should be to integrate the organized and logical manner as possible to ensure
the outcome is worth the cost and effort involved. The above text box highlights some
relevant performance dimensions that would be included in an assessment center.
It is important to only include those performance dimensions that are relevant to the
job, thus ensuring validity right from the beginning of the process
Again, the name of the game here is leverage: tests, simulation exercises, interview
questions, and other selection methods may already exist for a particular job (or even a
similar job) that can be integrated into an assessment center with little to no
modifications needed.
Once the performance dimensions and related competencies are determined, the
logistical considerations for the assessment center should be worked out.
For example, if an organization has five job candidates at least that many trained
assessors, and five private rooms in which individual assessment exercises can be
conducted simultaneously, then perhaps a 1-day assessment center approach may be
feasibly accomplished. However, if there are more than three or four exercises involved,
Or if the logistical requirements exceed what is available, a multiday assessment center
structure may be necessary.
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS: