Paper 5 (New) - Business Laws & Ethics
Paper 5 (New) - Business Laws & Ethics
Paper 5 (New) - Business Laws & Ethics
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN
Disclaimer
course, who are appearing for the BUSINESS LAWS & ETHICS exams
and omissions. Despite this, errors may still occur. Any mistake,
error, or
It is notified that neither the publisher nor the author or seller will be
action.
Unit 2: Consideration 23
Learning Outcomes –
• Types of contracts.
1. Introduction
The Law of Contract is the most important branch of mercantile law. It has an impact on trade,
commerce and industry.
• The Indian Contract Act, 1872 codifies the legal principles that govern ‘contracts’. The basically
identifies the ingredients of a legally enforceable valid contract in addition to dealing with special
type of contractual relationships.
2. Important terms
2.1 Contract
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 1
• Enforceability by law means giving rise to legal obligation. Domestic and Social obligations are
out of scope of the Contract Act, as they are not legally enforceable.
2.2 Agreement
2.3 Promise
3. Types of Agreement
Types
Domestic/
Social Political
Family
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 2
Scope It is wider term including It is used in narrow sense
both legal and social due to its legal
agreement enforceability
Nature All agreements are not All contracts are
contracts agreement
All Contracts are Agreements, but all Agreements are not Contracts
• Contract = Agreement + Enforceability by law. Thus, for a Contract, there should first be an
Agreement.
• Agreements that do not give rise to contractual obligations are not Contracts.
A invites B for his son's wedding. B accepts the invitation. This is a mere agreement, not a
Contract, there being no intention to create legal obligation.
Hence, all Agreements are not Contracts, but all contracts are in fact Agreements.
• The essential are given in Section 10 but this section is not complete and exhaustive. Therefore,
there are some general essentials apart from the essential given in Section 10.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 3
Essentials of Valid Contract
• These essential elements must be present in a contract, if these elements are not present in a
contract, then the contract is not valid.
• Both general essentials and elements given in Section 10 shall be present in a contract for it to
be a valid contract.
• A person cannot enter into a contract with himself, a contract involves at least two parties.
• A contract can be made by either natural persons or other persons having legal existence.
• There must be an intention on the part of the parties to create legal relationship between them.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 4
• Social or domestic type of agreements are not enforceable in court of law and hence they do not
result into contracts.
5.1.4 Certainty
of
meaning
Case Law: Balfour Vs. Balfour
• The Facts: A husband agreed to pay to his wife certain amount as maintenance every month
while he was abroad. Husband failed to pay the promised amount. Wife sued him for the
recovery of the amount.
Judgement: Wife could not recover the amount as it was a social agreement, and the
parties did not intend to create any legal relations.
• A contract may be written or spoken. In case of certain contracts some other formalities have to
be complied with to make an agreement legally enforceable.
•State of Gujarat
Two Parties in a
Vs. Ramanlal S
contract
&Co.
Parties must
intend to •Balfour Vs.
cretate legal Balfour
relationship
Possibility of •Possible to
performance perform
•Written contract
Other •Registered with
Formalities concerned
authority
5.2.1 Agreement
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 5
• An Agreement is the first essential element of a valid contract. It is a result of offer and
acceptance. A Contract will not come into existence if there’s no agreement.
• Consent means agreeing upon the same thing in the same sense. The consent shall be free (i.e.)
the parties must willingly enter into the contract.
• Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by Coercion, Undue Influence, Fraud,
Misrepresentation or mistake.
• Capacity to contract means the legal ability of a person to enter into a valid contract. A person is
competent to contract if he satisfies all the given conditions:
▪ He attained the age of majority
▪ He is a person of sound mind
▪ Is not disqualified by law
Disqualified by law
• The object and consideration must be lawful (i.e) it should not be prohibited by law or opposed
to public policy.
• The agreement entered into must not be which the law declares to be either illegal or void. A void
agreement is one without any legal effects.
• For a contract to be valid contract it must not be expressly declared as void by law
• It should not be
▪ Immoral
▪ Opposed to public policy
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 6
▪ Injurious
▪ Forbidden by law
6. Types of Contract
Types of Contract
The Valid Contract is an agreement that is legally binding and enforceable. It must qualify all the
essentials of a contract.
Definition:
The section 2(j) of the Act defines a void contract as “A contract which ceases to be
enforceable by law becomes void when it ceases to be enforceable”.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 7
6.1.3 Voidable Contract
• An agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the parties thereto,
but not at the option of the other or others, is a voidable contract.
• A voidable contract is a Valid Contract.
• In a voidable contract, at least one of the parties has to be bound to the terms of the contract.
• The other party is not bound and may choose to repudiate or accept the terms of the contract.
Options available to
agrreieved
Example: Punit points a gun at Hiten’s forehead and makes him enter a contract of sale of his
house to Punit for Rs. 10,00,000 only. In this situation, Hiten’s consent is not free as he is forced
to enter into the contract due to the threat to his life. The contract is voidable at Hiten’s option.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 8
Difference between Void and Voidable Contract
• Unenforceable contracts are rendered unenforceable by law due to some technical defect.
Example: Raj borrowed ₹ 1 Lakh from Rohan and promised to pay the same back within one
year. Rohan filed a case against Raj after six years and court denied the case as the same was
barred by limitation. Hence, it became an Unenforceable Contract
6.2 Formation
Types of Contract
• The terms of the Express Contract are clearly stated either orally or in writing.
• So, the main aspect of the Express Contract is that the terms of the contract are expressed clearly.
Contract form
Oral Written
Example: A person proposes to his friend an offer to sell his i-Phone 12 Pro for ₹ 4,500. His friend
agrees to buy the phone and gives confirmation over a call. This was an Express Contract.
• A contract in which the terms of the agreement are not expressed in written or oral form is an
implied contract.
• These contracts come into existence by implication.
• This implication is by action or conduct of parties or course of dealing.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 9
Example: A person boarded a bus that travelled from Kashmir to Kanyakumari. The conductor
arrived at his seat and asked to pay fare for the journey. This became an Implied Contract since
the person had boarded the bus with an intention to travel.
• Tacit Contracts: They are a sub-type of implied contracts; these contracts are inferred by the
conduct of the parties without any words spoken or written. It is not a separate type of contract;
it falls within the scope of implied contracts.
Example: A person enters the ATM and inserts the card in order to withdraw money. This is a
tacit (silent) Contract by the action of the parties.
• They are not contracts in the sense that no agreements are made between any of the parties.
• It comes into existence by a court order or under law.
• It is thus enforced by the law which also creates it.
• Most of the times the quasi-contract is created to stop any of the parties from taking unfair
advantage of the other.
Example: Finder of lost goods to return the goods to the original owner. This is a Quasi Contract
which is imposed by the law
6.2.4 E-Contract
• When a contract is formed by the use of electronic devices and means, it is called an electronic
contract or an e-contract.
• The electronic means and devices may include emails, tests, telephones, digital signatures etc.
They are also known as the Cyber contracts, the EDI contracts or the Electronic Data Interchange
contracts.
6.3 Performance
Contract on basis of
performance
Executed Executory
Contract Contract
Unilateral Bilateral
• When the parties to the contract perform their obligations under a contract, the contract is
executed in nature.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 10
Example: Mr. A goes to a general store, buys some goods, and pays to the shopkeeper for the
goods. This is an Executed Contract where both the parties have performed their respective
obligations.
7. Proposal / Offer
7.1 Definition
Makes an offer
Offeror/Promisor Offeree
Accepts an
offer
Offeree Promisee/Acceptor
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 11
7.2 Types of Offer
General
Counter
Standing
Cross
Specific
7.2.1 General Offer
• A General Offer is an offer that is made to the public at large. The genesis of a General Offer came
about from the Landmark case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
Judgement: Setting aside the arguments of the Defendant, the bench stated that in cases of such
offers i.e., general offers, there is no need for communication of acceptance, anyone who
performs the conditions of the contract is said to have communicated his/her acceptance, and
moreover, the money deposited by the Defendant in Alliance Bank clearly shows that they
intended to create a legally binding relationship.
• A Specific offer is an offer that is made to a specific or ascertained person, this type of offer can
only be accepted by the person to whom it is made.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 12
Case Law: Boulton v. Jones,
Facts: wherein the Plaintiff had taken the business of one Brocklehurst, the defendant used to
have business with Brocklehurst and not knowing about the change in ownership of business,
sent him an order for certain goods. The Defendant came to know about the change only after
receiving an invoice, at which point he had already consumed the goods. The Defendant refused
to pay the price, as he had a set off against the original owner, for which the plaintiff sued him.
Judgement: The Judges gave a unanimous judgement holding the defendant not liable.
• When two parties make an identical offer to each other, in ignorance to each other’s offer, they
are said to make cross offers. Cross offers are not valid offers
Example: If A makes a proposal to B to sell his car for ₹ 2,00,000 and B, without knowing the
proposal of A, makes an offer to purchase the same car at ₹ 2,00,000 from A, it is not an
acceptance, as B was not aware of proposal made by A. It is only cross proposal (cross offer).
• When the offeree offers a qualified acceptance of the offer subject to modifications and
variations in terms of the original offer, he is said to have made a counter offer.
• The original offer lapses as a result of a counter offer.
Example: ‘A’ offers to sell his plot to ‘B’ for ₹ 10 lakhs. ’B’ agrees to buy it for ₹ 8 lakhs. It amounts
to counteroffer. It will result in the termination of the offer of ’A’. If later on ‘B’ agrees to buy the
plot for ₹ 10 lakhs, ’A’ may refuse.
• An Offer which remains open for acceptance over a period of time is called a standing offer.
Tenders that are invited for supply of goods is a kind of Standing Offer.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 13
7.3 Essential of a valid offer
Must be made with a view to obtaining the assent of the other party
May be conditional
• An invitation to offer is only a circulation of an offer, it is an attempt to induce offers and precedes
a definite offer.
• An offer becomes an agreement when accepted.
• On the other hand, an invitation to offer becomes an offer when the public responds to it.
• The main objective of an invitation to offer is to negotiate the terms on which the contract can be
made.
Examples:
Outcomes
Accept Reject
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 14
Offer Vs. Invitation to Offer
Judgement: While plaintiffs had asked two questions, the defendant replied only to the second
question by quoting the price but reserved their answer with regard to their willingness to sell.
The mere statement of the lowest price at which the vendor would sell contained no implied
contract to sell to the person who had enquired about the price.
8. Acceptance
8.1 Definition
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 15
Offeror – Person who makes the proposal / offer
Offeree – Person to whom the proposal / offer is made
Right of Offeree – Only offeree has the right to accept the proposal
Acceptance – when Offeree gives assent / consent to the offer
Acceptor – Offeree becomes acceptor when assent is given
8.2.1 Acceptance can be given only by the person to whom offer is made:
• In the case of a specific proposal or offer, it can only be accepted by the person it was made to.
• No third person without the knowledge of the offeree can accept the offer.
• When the proposal is a general offer, then anyone with knowledge of the offer can accept it.
Example: Arjun went to his friend’s house, Chandu and made an offer to sell his I-Phone 12 Pro
for ₹ 50,000. This was accepted by another person Sonu in Chandu’s house, but Arjun refused
the contract as it was made to a specific person and had to be accepted by Offeree only.
According to Sir William Anson – Acceptance is to offer what a lighted match is to a train of
gun powder.
Example: Samar makes an offer to Andi to buy a diamond studded watch for ₹ 1 Lakh. Andi
accepts the offer but with a condition that he shall pay ₹ 85,000 only. This became qualified
acceptance and hence, not valid.
Judgement: It was held that N could not enforce his acceptance because it was not an unqualified one.
Union of India vs. Bahulal
A offers to sell his house to B for Rs. 1,00,000/-. B replied that, “I can pay Rs. 80,000 for it.” The offer of A is
rejected by B as the acceptance is not unqualified. B however changes his mind and is prepared to pay Rs.
1,00,000. This is also treated as counteroffer and it is up to A whether to accept it or not.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 16
8.2.3 Must be communicated
• For a proposal to become a contract, the acceptance of such a proposal must be communicated
to the promisor.
• One of the case law here was of Lalman Shukla Vs. Gauri Dutt
Judgement: There was no contract as the manager had not communicated his acceptance to the
supplier, B.
• Acceptance of the offer must be in the prescribed manner that is demanded by the offeror. If no
such manner is prescribed, it must be in a reasonable manner that would be employed in the
normal course of business.
Example: Raghu offered Rohan to purchase his car for ₹ 5,00,000. He asked Rohan to convey his
acceptance over a phone call. Rohan sent a WhatsApp message and this mode was not accepted
by Raghu as the prescribed mode was Phone call.
8.2.5 Time
• Acceptance must be given within the specified time limit, if any, and if no time is stipulated,
acceptance must be given within the reasonable time and before the offer lapses.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 17
Example: Ajay offers to sell 100 apples for ₹ 2,000 to Vijay. Vijay does not reply to Ajay within a
reasonable time and the apples get rot. Hence, communication of acceptance within a reasonable
time is required.
• If there is a time fixed for communication of acceptance, then it must be done within the fixed
time
• In case there is no time fixed for communication of acceptance, it must be done within reasonable
time
• What is reasonable time is nowhere defined in the law and thus would depend on facts and
circumstances of the particular case.
• The acceptance of an offer cannot be implied from the silence of the offeree or his failure to
answer, unless the offeree has in any previous conduct indicated that his silence is the evidence
of acceptance.
Example: Mr. A offers to sell Mr. B MacBook Pro for ₹ 70,000. Mr. B remains silent and does not
respond to the offer. This is a case of mere silence that does not amount to acceptance.
Judgement: F could not succeed as his nephew had not communicated the acceptance to him.
• Section 8 of Indian Contract Act 1872 provides that acceptance by conduct or actions of the
promisee is acceptable. So, if a person performs certain actions that communicate that he has
accepted the offer, such implied acceptance is permissible.
Example: A boy offers his sibling ₹ 1,000 for polishing his shoe for the next month. Sibling accepts
the money given. This is an implied acceptance that the sibling will polish his shoes for the next
month.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 18
Acceptance
Performs conditions
Accepts the consideration
imposed
• One important common requirement for both offer and acceptance is their effective
communication. Effective and proper communication prevents avoidable revocation and
misunderstanding between parties.
• When the contracting parties are face-to-face, there is no problem of communication because
there is instantaneous communication of offer and acceptance. In such a case the question of
revocation does not arise since the offer and its acceptance are made instantly.
• The difficulty arises when the contracting parties utilize services such as post or email etc, in such
cases it becomes very important to ascertain what is the exact time of communication of offer
and acceptance.
In terms of Section 4 of the Act, the communication of offer is complete when it comes to the
knowledge of the person to whom it is made.
Example: A writes to B offering to fix his roof for five thousand rupees. He posts the letter on 2nd
July. The letter reaches B on 4th July. So, the communication is said to complete on 4th July. In
case B reads the letter on 5th July, then the date of communication of offer will be 5th July as that
is the date when the offeree comes to know about the offer.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 19
9.2 Communication of Acceptance
Communication of Acceptance
By Act By conduct
• This would include communication via words, whether oral or written. So, this will include
communication via telephone calls, letters, e-mails, telegraphs, etc.
• The offeree can also convey his acceptance of the offer through some action of his, or by his
conduct.
So, say when a person boards a bus, he is accepting to pay the bus fare via his conduct.
• Sometimes there are situations where there are contracts with special conditions.
• These special conditions are conveyed tacitly and the acceptance of these conditions are also
conveyed by the offeree again tacitly or without him even realizing it.
• In term of Section 4, communication of revocation (of the proposal or its acceptance) is complete.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 20
▪ as against the person who makes it (Person making revocation) when it is put into a course
of transmission to the person to whom it is made so as to be out of the power of the person
who makes it, and
▪ as against the person to whom it is made, when it comes to his knowledge.
• As per Section 5 of the Act, offer can be revoked at any time before communication of
acceptance is completed as against the offeror.
• As per Section 5 of the Act, acceptance can be revoked at any time before the communication
of acceptance is complete against the acceptor.
Example: Anil send a letter of offer to Sunil on 10th August, the letter reaches Sunil of 14th August
and he reads it on the same day. Sunil posts his letter of acceptance on 17th August. In this case, the
communication of acceptance from Anil’s point is completed on 17th August, therefore, Anil can
revoke his offer at any time before 17th August.
In the above situation, if the letter of acceptance reaches Anil on 20th August, if Sunil wants to
revoke his acceptance, he can do so before 20th August (i.e) before the communication of acceptance
is complete from Sunil’s point of view.
Notice of Revocation
Lapse of Time
Non-fulfilment of conditions
attached to offer
Counter Offer
Subsequent illegality
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 21
12. Overview
Contract
[Section 2(h)]
Essentials Communicatio
Elements Types of
of valid n of Offer and Revocation
of contract contracts
contract acceptance
Promise Void
Consideration
[Section 2(b)]
Voidable
Offer Illegal
Acceptance
[Section 2(a)]
Unenforceable
Rules to a valid
Invitation Based on
Types acceptance
to offer Formation
Can be given Express
General only by the
person to Implied
Specific whom offer is
made Quasi
Cross Absolute and
E-contract
unqualified
Counter Based on
Communicated Performance
Standing In the Executed
prescribed
mode Executory
Within
specified time
limit
Mere silence is
not acceptance
Implied
acceptance
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 22
CH-1: UNIT 2 – CONSIDERATION
Learning Outcomes –
• Importance of consideration.
1. Introduction
2. What is Consideration?
Consideration is the price agreed to be paid by the promisee for the obligation of the promisor.
Example : A college promises students, who will score above 95% for the job in MNC.
Consideration need not to be monetary. Here the promise for recruitment of candidate will be
considered as consideration for the act of students scoring above 95%.
Example : Abhishek promises Bharti not to file a suit against him if she (Bharti) would pay him
(Abhishek) ₹ 1,00,000. Here abstinence on the part of Abhishek would constitute consideration
against Bharti’s payment of ₹ 1,00,000 in favour of Abhishek.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 23
Consideration = Promise / Performance that parties exchange with each other.
Consideration must be offered by the promisee or the third An act done at the desire of a
party at the desire or request of the promisor. third party is not a
consideration.
In India, consideration may proceed from the promisee or any other person who is not a party to
the contract. The words “…promisee or any other person…” in the definition u/s 2(d) makes this
proposition clear.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 24
Case Law: Chinnayya vs. Ramayya (1882)
Facts: An old lady made a gift of her property to her daughter with a direction to
pay a certain sum of money to the maternal uncle by way of annuity. On the same
day, the daughter executed a writing in favour of the brother agreeing to pay
annuity. The daughter did not, however, pay the annuity and the uncle sued to
recover it.
Judgement: There was sufficient consideration for the uncle to recover the money
from the daughter.
• The promise by one party may be the consideration for an act by some other party, and
vice versa.
Example : A pays ₹5,000 to B and B promises to deliver to him a certain quantity of wheat
within a month. Here, the promise by B to deliver the wheat within a month is the
consideration for A to pay ₹5,000. Thus, the consideration paid by A is executed, whereas the
consideration promised by B is executory.
The words “…has done or abstained from doing…” [as contained in Section 2(d)] are a recognition
of the doctrine of past consideration.
Example : ‘A’ performed some services to ‘B’ at his desire. After a week, ‘B’ promises to
compensate ‘A’ for the work done by him. This is a past consideration and A can sue B for
recovering the promised money.
A past consideration may be the motive but cannot be the real consideration of a
subsequent promise.
Example : A agrees to supply wheat bags to B and B agrees to pay for them on a future date. This
consideration is the future consideration.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 25
3.5 Consideration need not be adequate
The value of the consideration need not be equal to the value of the promise, act, or
abstinence for which it is given. However, consideration must be something which the law
considers as having some value.
Example : X promises to sell a house worth ₹6 lacs for ₹1 lacs only, the adequacy of the price in
itself shall not render the transaction void, unless the party pleads that transaction takes place
under coercion, undue influence, or fraud.
• The performance of an act by a person who is legally bound to perform the same cannot be
consideration for a contract.
• But where a person promises to do more that he is legally bound to do, such a promise
provided it is not opposed to public policy, is a good consideration.
Consideration must be something to which the law attaches some value. If it is legally or
physically impossible it is not considered valid consideration.
Example : A man promises to discover treasure by magic, bringing the dead person to live again.
This transaction can be said to be void as it is illusory.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 26
4. Suit by a third party to a contract
In case of a trust, the contract is between the settler and the trustee. However, a beneficiary can
enforce his right under the trust, though he is not a party to the contract.
• In the case of a family settlement, the members of family who originally had not been
parties to the settlement may enforce the agreement.
• However, the terms of settlement must have been reduced into writing.
Example : Two brothers X and Y agreed to pay an allowance of ₹20,000 to mother on partition
of joint properties. But later they denied to abide by it. It was held that their mother although
stranger to contract can require their sons for such allowance in the court of law.
In the case of certain marriage contracts/arrangements, a provision may be made for the
benefit of a person. Such a person may file the suit though he is not a party to the agreement.
Example : Mr. X’s wife deserted him for ill-treating her. Mr. X promised his wife’s father Mr. Puri
that he will treat her properly or else pay her monthly allowance. But she was again ill-treated by
her husband. It was held that she has all right to sue Mr. X against the contract made between
Mr. X and Mr. Puri even though she was stranger to contract.
• In the case of assignment of a contract, when the benefit under a contract has been assigned,
the assignee can enforce the contract
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 27
4.2.7 Acknowledgement or Estoppel
Where the promisor by his conduct acknowledges himself as an agent of the third party, it
would result into a binding obligation towards third party.
Example : L gives to M ₹20,000 to be given to N, and M informs N that he is holding the money
for him. Afterwards M refuses to pay the money to N. In that case, N will be entitled to recover
the same from M.
In the case of covenant running with the land, the person who purchases land with notice that
the owner of land is bound by certain duties affecting land, the covenant affecting the land
may be enforced by the successor of the seller.
Example : One owner of the land having two land adjacent to each other. One was agricultural
land. He sold the other land containing a condition that it can never be used for Industrial
purpose so as to protect the other agricultural land from pollution. Such condition is attached
with the land so who so ever is the successor of land has to abide by it. Such are called restrictive
covenants and all successors are bound to it.
The principal can enforce the contracts entered by his agent where the agent has acted within
the scope of his authority and in the name of the principal.
Assignment
In case of certain of contract
marriage Acknowledgement
contracts or or estoppel
arragements
In case of a Covenant
family running with
settlement a land
Exceptions
Contracts
In case of to the Doctrine through
trust of Privity of
agent
Contract
The general rule is that an agreement made without consideration is void (Section 25). However,
the Indian Contract Act contains certain exceptions to this rule.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 28
In the following cases, the agreement though made without consideration, will be valid and enforceable
–
i) Natural Love and Affection - A written and registered agreement based on natural love and
affection between the parties standing in near relation (e.g., husband and wife) to each other is
enforceable even without consideration [Section 25(1)].
Example : A husband by a registered deed, promises to bring a diamond necklace for his wife. This
agreement is valid, though it is without consideration and can be enforced.
ii) Compensation for past voluntary services – A promise to compensate, wholly or in part, a person
who has already voluntarily done something for the promisor, is enforceable [Section 25(2)].
However, following conditions need to be satisfied
c. The promisor must be in existence at the time when services were rendered.
Example : Peter finds Sameer’s wallet on the road and returns it to him. Sameer is happy to find his
lost wallet and promises to pay Peter ₹ 2,000. In this case, too, the no consideration no contract rule
does not apply. This contract is a valid contract.
iii) Promise to pay time barred debt – Where a promise in writing, signed by the person making it or
by his authorised agent, is made to pay a debt barred by limitation, it is valid without consideration
[Section 25(3)].
Example : Pratik owes ₹1,00,000 to Hari. He had borrowed the money 5 years ago. However, he
never paid a single rupee back. He signs a written promise to pay ₹50,000 to Hari as a final settlement
of the loan. In this case, ‘the no consideration no contract’ rule does not apply either. This is a valid
contract.
v) Completed gift – In case of completed gifts, the rule no consideration no contract does not apply
[Explanation (1) to Section 25]
vi) Bailment – Bailment means the delivery of goods from one person to another for some purpose
[Section 148]. Such delivery is made upon a contract that after accomplishment of the purpose, the
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 29
goods will either be returned or disposed of, according to the directions of the person delivering
them. No consideration is required to affect a contract of bailment.
Example : Mr. Y deposits his goods in the godown of Mr. A for free. Mr. A hand over the keys of his
godown to Mr. Y. Mr. Y gets possession of godown but not the ownership. As soon as Mr. Y lifts his
goods from godown he is liable to hand over the keys back to Mr. A..
vii) Charity – If a promisee undertakes the liability on the promise of the person to contribute to
charity, there the contract shall be valid.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 30
6. Summary
Consideration
[Section 2(d)]
Must not be
unlawful, immoral
or opposed to
public policy
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 31
CH-1: UNIT 3 – OTHER ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A CONTRACT
Learning Outcomes –
1. Introduction
2. Capacity to Contract
Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states who is competent to contract –
“Every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which
he is subject, and who is of sound mind and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to
which he is subject”
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 32
2.1 Age of Majority
The age of majority in India is governed by The Indian Majority Act, 1875. Every person domiciled in
India shall attain the age of majority on the completion of 18 years of age and not before. The
following are the laws relating to minor’s agreement/position of minor –
A minor cannot ratify the agreement on attaining majority as the original agreement is void ab
initio and a void agreement can never be ratified.
Example : X, a minor makes a promissory note in the name of Y. He cannot ratify it on attaining
majority. Also, if he makes a new promissory note in place of old one, here the new promissory
note which he executed after attaining majority is also void being without consideration.
Though a minor is not competent to contract, he can be a beneficiary to the contract i.e., entitled
to the benefits of the contract.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 33
2.1.5 Liability for necessaries
▪ The contract must be for goods which are necessary for life, and
▪ The minor must not have already a sufficient supply of these necessaries.
Example : Shruti being a minor purchased a laptop for her online classes of ₹70,000 on credit
from a shop. But her assets could pay only ₹20,000. The shop keeper could not hold Shruti
personally liable and could recover only amount recoverable through her assets i.e., up to ₹
20,000.
• Where the guardian makes a contract for the minor, which is within his competence and
which is for the benefit of the minor, there will be valid contract which the minor can
enforce.
• However, all contracts made by guardian on behalf of a minor are not valid.
Example : The guardian of a minor has no power to bind the minor by a contact for the
purchase of immovable Property. But a contract entered into by a certified guardian
(appointed by the Court) of a minor, with the sanction of the court for the sale of the minor’s
property, may be enforced by either party to the contract.
No court can allow specific performance of a contract with minors because it is void altogether.
2.1.8 No insolvency
• A minor cannot be declared insolvent as a minor cannot incur any liability personally.
• He can never be held personally liable. Dues are payable from the personal properties of
minor
2.1.9 Partnership
A minor cannot become a partner in a partnership firm, but he can be admitted to the benefits
of partnership with the consent of all the partners [Section 30 of the Indian Partnership Act].
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 34
2.1.10 Minor can be an agent
A minor can draw, deliver, and
• A minor can act as an agent and bind the principal
endorse negotiable instruments
• But he will not be liable to his principal for his without himself being liable.
acts.
A minor is not capable of binding his parent or guardian, even for necessaries. They will be held
liable only when the minor acts as their agent.
Example : Richa, a minor entered into contract of buying a scooty from the dealer and mentioned
that her parents will be liable for the payment of scooty. The dealer sent a letter to her parents
for money. The parents will not be liable for such payment as the contract was entered by a minor
in their absence and out of their knowledge.
In case a joint Contract is made by minor and an adult, the adult will be liable on the contract
and not the minor.
When an adult gives a guarantee on behalf of a minor, then the adult is liable to the third party
as if there is direct contract between the surety and the third party.
Example : Mr. X guaranteed for the purchase of a mobile phone by Krish, a minor. In case of
failure for payment by Krish, Mr. X will be liable to make the payment.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 35
2.1.15 Liability for torts
Section 12 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states who is a person of sound mind
–
“A person is said to be of sound mind for the purposes of making a contract if, at the
time when he makes it is capable of understanding it and of forming a rational
judgement as to its effect upon his interests.”
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 36
Person who is usually of unsound
He may make a contract
mind, but occasionally of sound
when he is of sound mind
mind
• Besides minors and persons of unsound mind, there are also other persons who are disqualified
from contracting, partially or wholly. The contracts by such person are void.
• Incompetency to contract may arise from political status, corporate status, legal status, etc.
The following persons fall in this category:
▪ Convicts,
▪ Insolvent etc.
3. Free Consent
3.1 Consent
“Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing
in the same sense.”
Example : If two persons enter into an apparent contract concerning a particular person or ship,
and it turns out that each of them, misled by similarity of name, had a different person or ship in
his mind, no contract would exist between them as they were not ad idem, i.e., of the same mind.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 37
• Free consent is necessary for the validity of a contract.
Contract is Voidable
“Coercion’ is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal
Code or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain any property, to the prejudice of any
person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.”
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 38
4.1.1 The essential ingredients of Coercion
✓ It is immaterial whether the India Penal Code is or is not in force at the place where the
coercion is employed.
Example : Where husband obtained a release deed from his wife and son under a threat of
committing suicide, the transaction was set aside on the ground of coercion, suicide being
forbidden by the Indian Penal Code. The threat of suicide amounts to coercion within Section 15.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 39
i) Relation between the parties – A person can dominate other when there is near relation
between them.
ii) Position to dominate the will – The relation between the two parties is such that one is in
a position to dominate the other. A person is deemed to dominate the will of other in these
situations:
d) Where one of the parties to a contract is in a position to dominate the will of the other
and the contract is apparently unconscionable i.e., unfair. [Unconscionable
bargains are witnessed mostly in money-lending transactions and in gifts.]
Examples :
• Real and apparent authority : A father, by reason of his authority over the son can
dominate the will of the son.
• Fiduciary relationship : By reason of fiduciary relationship, a solicitor can dominate the
will of his client and a trustee can dominate the will of the beneficiary.
• Mental distress : A doctor is deemed to be in a position to dominate the will of his patient
enfeebled by protracted illness.
iii) The object must be to take undue advantage - The person in a position to influence the
will of the other in getting consent, must have the object to take advantage of the other.
Example : A teacher asks her daughter to get married to one of his brilliant students. Both
the girl and boy were smart, settled, and intelligent. Here the teacher had a relation which
can have influence on both of them. But, as no undue advantage of such influence was taken
such contract of marriage is said to be made by free consent.
iv) Burden of proof - The dominant party will have to prove that they have not used their
dominant position to take unfair advantage of the other and induce them to enter a contract.
4.2.2 Power to set aside contract induced by undue influence [Section 19A]
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 40
• Such contract may be set aside either absolutely, or, if the party who was entitled to avoid
it has received any benefit thereunder, upon such terms and conditions as to the Court
may seem just.
Case Study
Facts: A student was induced by his teacher to sell his brand-new car to the latter at less than the purchase price to
secure more marks in the examination. Accordingly, the car was sold. The student’s father persuaded him to sue his
teacher.
Judgement: The student can sue his teacher on the ground of undue influence under the provisions of Indian Contract
Act, 1872.
Position of benefits Any benefit already received must The court has discretion to direct
received be returned once the contract is the aggrieved party to return the
rescinded. benefit in whole or in part.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 41
Definition of Fraud [Section 17]
‘Fraud’ means and includes any of the following acts committed by a party to a contract, or with his connivance,
or by his agent, with an intent to deceive another party thereto or his agent, or to induce him to enter into the
contract:
• the suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true,
• the active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact,
• a promise made without any intention of performing it,
• any other act fitted to deceive,
• any such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent.
i) Duty of the person to speak – Where the circumstances of the case are such that it is
the duty of the person observing silence to speak. For example, in contracts of uberrimae
fidei i.e., contracts of utmost good faith.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 42
Contracts of Share
Fiduciary Contracts of Contracts of
Family Allotment
Relationship Insurance Marriage
Settlement Contracts
▪ Fiduciary Relationship - The person in whom confidence is reposed is under a duty to act
with utmost good faith and make full disclosure of all material facts concerning the
agreement, known to him.
▪ Contracts of Insurance - In contracts of marine, fire and life insurance, there is an implied
condition that full disclosure of material facts shall be made. Otherwise, the insurer is entitled
to avoid the contract.
▪ Contracts of marriage - Every material fact must be disclosed by the parties to a contract of
marriage (Hazi Ahmed v. Abdul Gassi)
▪ Contracts of family settlement - Full disclosure of material facts within the knowledge of
the parties is required.
▪ Share Allotment contracts - Persons issuing ‘Prospectus’ at the time of public issue of
shares/debentures by a joint stock company have to disclose all material facts within their
knowledge.
ii) Where the silence itself is equivalent to speech – Mere silence as to facts likely to
affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is fraud where his silence is, in
itself, equivalent to speech.
Examples :
• B is A’s daughter and has just come of age. Here, the relation between the parties would
make it A’s duty to tell B if the horse is unsound.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 43
• When B says to A – “If you do not deny it, I shall assume that the horse is sound”. A says
nothing. Here A’s silence is equivalent to speech.
i) the positive assertion, in a manner not warranted by the information of the person making it,
of that which is not true, though he believes it to be true,
ii) any breach of duty which, without an intent to deceive, gains an advantage to the person
committing it, or anyone claiming under him; by misleading another to his prejudice or to the
prejudice of anyone claiming under him,
iii) causing, however, innocently, a party to an agreement to make a mistake as to the substance
of the thing which is the subject of the agreement.
• Maker of the statement of fact, which is false, believes it to be true, even though such fact
is not justified by the information he possesses.
Example : A makes a positive statement to B that C will be made the director of a company.
A makes the statement on information derived, not directly from C but from M. B applies for
shares on the faith of the statement which turns out to be false. The statement amounts to
misrepresentation, because the information received second-hand did not warrant A to make
the positive statement to B.
• Breach of duty by a person without the intention to deceive and such breach brings an
advantage to him.
Examples :
▪ ‘A’ believed the engine of his motorcycle to be in an excellent condition. ‘A’ without getting
it checked in a workshop, told to ‘B’ that the motorcycle was in excellent condition. On this
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 44
statement, ‘B’ bought the motorcycle, whose engine proved to be defective. Here, ‘A’s
statement is misrepresentation as the statement turns out to be false.
▪ A buy an article thinking that it is worth ₹1000 when in fact it is worth only ₹500. There
has been no misrepresentation on the part of the seller. The contract is valid.
• A party causes, even though done innocently, the other party to the agreement to make a
mistake as to the subject matter.
Example : A, intending to deceive B, falsely represents that 500 maunds of indigo are made
annually at A’s factory, and thereby induces B to buy the factory. The contract is voidable at the
option of B as consent is caused by fraud.
• Exception-
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 45
b) A fraud or misrepresentation which did not cause the consent to a contract of
the party on whom such fraud was practiced, or to whom such misrepresentation was
made, does not render a contract voidable.
Example : When a seller of specific goods deliberately conceals a fault in order that the
buyer may not discover it even if he inspects the goods, but the buyer does not in fact,
make any inspection, the buyer cannot avoid the contract, as he is not in fact deceived by
the conduct of the seller.
A party to contract, whose consent was so caused by fraud or misrepresentation may, if he thinks
fit, insist that the contract shall be performed, and that he shall be put in the position in which
he would have been if the representation made had been true.
4.6 Mistake
• Mistake may be defined as innocent or erroneous belief which leads the party to
misunderstand the others.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 46
Mistake
Identity
Title
Price
Quantity
• This mistake may relate to the mistake of the Indian laws, or it can be a mistake of foreign
laws.
• Mistake of Indian Law – If the mistake is regarding Indian laws, it does not render a
contract void as Ignoratia Juris Non Excuta i.e., ignorance of the law is not a good enough
excuse.
• However, if the mistake of law is caused through the inducement of another, the contract
may be avoided.
• Mistake of Foreign Law – Mistake of foreign law is excusable and is treated like a mistake
of fact. Contract may be avoided on such mistake.
• Bilateral Mistake –
o Where the contracting parties misunderstood each other and are at cross
purposes, there is a bilateral or mutual mistake.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 47
o Where both the parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact
essential to the agreement, the agreement is void.
• Unilateral Mistake –
o Unilateral mistake is not allowed as a defence to avoid a Contract. So, if only one party
has made a mistake of fact the contract remains a valid contract.
Example : A offers to sell his Ambassador Car to B, who believes that A has only Fiat Car, agrees
to buy the car. Here, the two parties are thinking about different subject matter so that there is
no real consent, and the agreement is void.
Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 describes which considerations are lawful and
those which are not –
1. It is forbidden by law; or
2. Is of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law; or
3. Is fraudulent; or
4. Involves injury to the person or property of another; or
5. The court regards it as immoral; or
6. Opposed to public policy.
Examples :
• ‘A’ promises to B to abandon a prosecution which he had instituted against B for robbery and B
promises in lieu thereof to restore the value of the property robbed. The agreement is void as its
object, namely, the stifling of prosecution, is unlawful.
• ‘A’ promises to obtain for B an employment in the public service and B promises, in return, to pay
₹1,00,000 to A. The agreement is void. The consideration, being opposed to public policy, is
unlawful.
• When the object of a contract or the consideration of a contract is prohibited by law, then they
are not lawful consideration or object anymore. They then become unlawful in nature. And
so, such a contract cannot be valid anymore.
• Unlawful consideration of object includes acts that are specifically punishable by the law.
This also includes those that the appropriate authorities prohibit via rules and regulations.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 48
But if the rules made by such authorities are not in tandem with the law, then these will not
apply.
Example : A licence to cut grass is given to X by the Forest Department under the Forest Act. One
of the terms of licence is that the licencee should not assign his interest under the licence without
the permission of the Forest Officer, and a fine is prescribed for a breach of this condition. But the
observance of the conditions of the licence is not obligatory under the Forest Act. If X in breach of
the condition, agrees to assign his interest under the licence to B, that agreement will be valid.
Here, the assignment is not prohibited by law, the condition against assignment has been imposed
only for administrative purpose or solely for the protection of revenue.
This means that the contract is trying to defeat the intention of the law. If the courts find that
the real intention of the parties to the agreement is to defeat the provisions of the law, it will put
aside the said contract.
Example : A and B enter into an agreement, where A is the debtor, that B will not plead limitation.
This, however, is done to defeat the intention of the Limitation Act, and so the courts can rule the
contract as void due to unlawful object.
Example : A decides to sell goods to B and smuggle them outside the country. This is a fraudulent
transaction hence, it is void. Now B cannot recover the money under the law if A does not deliver
on his promise.
5.4 Consideration or object defeats any rule for the time being in force in India
If the consideration or the object is against any rules in effect in the country for the time being,
then they will not be lawful consideration or objects. And so, the contract thus formed will not
be valid.
In legal terms, an injury means a criminal and harmful wrong done to another person. So, if the
object or the consideration of the contract does harm to another person or property, this will
amount to unlawful consideration.
Example : An agreement to publish a book that is a violation of another person’s copyright would
be void. This is because the consideration here is unlawful and injures another person’s property,
i.e. his copyright.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 49
If the object or the consideration are regarded by the court as immoral, then such contract is not
valid.
For the betterment of the community, there are certain restriction on contracts in the name
of public policy. But we do not use public policy in a wide sense in this matter. If that was the case
it would curtail individual freedom of people to enter into contracts. So, for the purpose of lawful
consideration and object public policy is used in a limited scope.
Some of the agreements which are held to be opposed to public policy are as follows-
Entering into an agreement with a person from a country with whom India is at war is void, as
the object is opposed to public policy.
Example : India entered in war like situation with China. Mr. A from India entered into contract
with China for import of toys. Such contract is void as China is alien enemy of India. The contract
if made before such war like situation may be suspended or dissolved.
• This is a pervasion of the natural course of law, and such contracts are void.
• The principle is that one should not make a trade of felony (i.e., a serious crime). The
compromise of any public offence is generally illegal.
• The agreement for supplying funds by way of Maintenance or Champerty is valid unless
Examples : ‘A’ offer B ₹ 2000, if he sues C for a case which they could have settled mutually under
provisions of law, just to annoy C. Such agreement is maintenance agreement.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 50
▪ A agrees to pay expenses to B if he sues C and B agrees to pay half of the amount received
from result of such suit. This is an agreement of champerty.
An agreement to trafficking in public office is opposed to public policy, as it interferes with the
appointment of a person best qualified for the service of the public. Public policy requires
that there should be no money consideration for the appointment to an office in which the public
is interested.
Example : Harish paid ₹15,000 to the officer to give his son the job in the Forest department of
India. On failure by officer he couldn’t recover the amount as such contract amounts to trafficking
in public office which is opposed to public policy.
Agreements having for their object the establishment of monopolies are opposed to public
policy and therefore void.
Example : XYZ and ABC were only the manufactures of oxygen cylinders in West Bengal. They
both entered into contract of supplying the same at very high rates and enjoy the monopoly rates
during the COVID-19 period in the country. Such contract is opposed to public policy as they
intended to create monopolies.
Marriage bureau only provides information and doesn’t negotiate marriage for reward;
therefore, it is not covered under this point.
An agreement whose object is to induce any judicial officer of the State to act partially or
corruptly is void, as it is opposed to public policy. Also, an agreement which contemplates the
use of under-hand means to influence legislation is void.
Examples :
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 51
• A, who is the manager of a firm, agrees to pass a contract to X if X pays to A ₹200,000 privately;
the agreement is void.
o any one or any part of any one of several considerations for a single object, is
unlawful, the agreement is void.
▪ where the legal part of a contract can be severed from the illegal part, the bad part
may be rejected, and the good one can be retained.
▪ But, where the illegal part cannot be severed, the contract is altogether void.
Agreements
tending to create
monopolies
Trafficking relating Marriage
to Public Offices brokerage
and titles agreements
Maintenance Interference
and with the course
Champerty of justice
Interest
Stifling
against
prosecution
obligation
Agreements
Trading with opposed to Consideration
enemy public Unlawful in Part
policy
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 52
6. Void Agreements
Every agreement in restraint of marriage of any person other than a minor, is void. So, if a
person, being a major, agrees for good consideration not to marry, the promise is not binding and
considered as void agreement.
An agreement of service by which an employee binds himself, during the term of his
agreement, not to compete with his employer is not in restraint of trade.
▪ Sale of goodwill – Where a person sells the goodwill of a business and agrees with the
buyer to refrain from carrying on a similar business, within specified local limits, so
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 53
long as the buyer or his successor in interest carries on a like business therein, such
an agreement is valid.
▪ In case of outgoing partner – Under Section 36 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 if
an outgoing partner makes an agreement with the continuing partners that he will not
carry on any business similar to that of the firm within a specified period or within
specified local limits, such an agreement, thought in restraint of trade, will be valid, if
the restrictions imposed are reasonable.
▪ Agreement between partners – Under Section 11 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932
an agreement between partners not to carry on competing business during the
continuance of partnership is valid.
Statutory Judicial
provisions Interpretations
Indian LLP
Sale of
Partnership Act,
goodwill
Act, 1932 2008
Sole or
Trade Service Exclusive
combinations agreements dealing
agreements
and
franchise
a) by which any party thereto is restricted absolutely from enforcing his rights under
a contract through a Court or
a) A contract by which the parties agree that any dispute between them in respect of
any subject shall be referred to arbitration and that only the amount awarded in such
arbitration shall be recoverable is a valid contract.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 54
b) A contract by which the parties agree to refer to arbitration any question between
them which has already arisen, or which may arise in future, is valid; but such a
contract must be in writing.
• But, where the meaning thereof is capable of being made certain, the agreement is valid.
Example : A agrees to sell B “a hundred tons of oil”. There is nothing whatever to show what kind
of oil was intended. The agreement is void for uncertainty. But the agreement would be valid if A
was dealer only in coconut oil; because in such a case its meaning would be capable of being made
certain.
• But if one of the parties has control over the event, agreement is not a wager.
Example : A agrees to pay ₹ 50,000 to B if it rains, and B promises to pay a like amount to A, if it
does not rain, the agreement will be by way of wager.
Promise to
pay money
or money's
worth Conditional
No interest
on an event
in the event
happening
except for
or not
stake
Essentials happening
of a
Common wager
intention to
bet at the Uncertainity
time of of event
making the
agreement Two parties
- each must
stand to win
or lose
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 55
6.5.1 Transactions similar to Wager (Gambling)
Lottery transactions
• A game of chance.
• Where prime motive is gambling - it is wager.
• Even a lottery authorised by GOI is wagering - only effect of such sanction
is thatperson running the lottery is not punished under IPC
Crossword puzzles and Competitions
• Crossword puzzles in which prizes depend upon the correspondence of
the competitor’s solution with a previously prepared solution kept with
the editor of a newspaper is a lottery and therefore, a wagering
transaction.
• State of Bombay vs. R.M.D. Chamarbangwala
Speculative Transactions
• An agreement or a share market transaction where the parties intend to
settle the difference between the contract price and the market price of
certain goods or shares on a specified day, is a gambling and hence void.
Horse Race Transaction
• A horse race competition where prize payable to the bet winner is less
than Rs. 500, is a wager.
Facts: A crossword puzzle was given in magazine. A solved his crossword puzzle and his
solution corresponded with previously prepared solution kept with the editor.
Judgement: This was a game of chance and therefore a lottery (wagering transaction).
6.5.2 Transactions resembling with wagering transaction but are not void
a) Chit fund: Chit fund does not come within the scope of wager u/s 30. In case of a chit fund,
a certain number of persons decide to contribute a fixed sum for a specified period and at
the end of a month, the amount so contributed is paid to the lucky winner of the lucky draw.
c) Games of skill and Athletic Competition: Crossword puzzles, picture competitions and
athletic competitions where prizes are awarded on the basis of skill and intelligence are
the games of skill and hence such competition are valid.
According to the Prize Competition Act, 1955 prize competition in games of skill are not
wagers provided the prize money does not exceed ₹1,000.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 56
d) Contract of insurance: A contract of insurance is a type of contingent contract and is valid
under law and these contracts are different from wagering agreements.
Insurable Interest Insured party has insurable interest There is no property in case of
in the life or property sought to be wagering agreement. There is betting
insured. on other’s life and properties.
Contract of Indemnity Except life insurance, the contract of Loser has to pay the fixed amount on
insurance indemnifies the insured the happening of uncertain event.
person against loss.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 57
7. Overview
Lawful
Capacity to Not expressly
Free Consent consideration
contract declared void
& Object
Agreements
Major Not caused by where
consideration or
object is unlawful
Sound mind
Coercion
Forbidden by law
Not
disqualified Undue
Influence Defeats the
provision of law
Fraud
Fraudulent
Mis-
representatio
Defeats any rule
n
Injury to the
Mistake person or
property of
another
Immoral
Opposed to public
policy
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 58
CH-1: UNIT 4 – PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT
Learning Outcomes –
• Refusal of performance.
• Appropriation of payments.
• When two or more persons have made a joint promise, then unless a contrary intention appears
by the contract, all such persons must jointly fulfil the promise.
• If any of them dies, his legal representatives must, jointly with the surviving promisors,
fulfil the promise.
• If all of them die, the legal representatives of all of them must fulfil the promise jointly.
Example : ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’ jointly promised to pay ₹6,00,000 to ‘D’. Here ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’ must jointly
perform the promise. If ‘A’ dies before performance, then his legal representatives must jointly with
‘B’ and ‘C’ perform the promise, and so on. And if all the three (i.e. ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’) die before
performance, then the legal representatives of all must jointly perform the promise.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 59
Succession Assignment
9. Discharge of a Contract
• By Performance
• By Mutual Agreement
• By Impossibility of Performance
• By Lapse of Time
• By Operation of Law
• By Breach of Contract
• By waiver or remission of performance by promisee
• By neglect of promisee to afford the promisor reasonable
facilities for performance
• By merger of rights
When the parties to the contract fulfil their obligations arising under the contract within
the time and in the manner prescribed. Discharge by performance may be
• Actual performance; or
• Attempted performance.
Example : Actual performance – A contracts to sell his car to B on the agreed price. the contract
comes to an end by performance as soon as the car is delivered to B and B pays the agreed price
for it.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 60
11.2 Discharge by mutual agreement
If the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to rescind or remit or
alter it, the original contract need not be performed [Section 62].
• The impossibility may exist from the very start. In that case, it would be impossibility ab
initio.
• Alternatively, impossibility may supervene. Supervening impossibility may take place owing
to:
A contract should be performed within a specified period as prescribed by the Limitation Act,
1963. If it is not performed and if no action is taken by the promisee within the specified
period of limitation, he is deprived of remedy at law.
Example : If a creditor does not file a suit against the buyer for recovery of the price within three
years, the debt becomes time-barred and hence irrecoverable.
A contract may be discharged by operation of law which includes by death of the promisor, by
insolvency etc.
• If a party to a contract fails to perform his obligation according to the time and place
specified, then he is said to have committed a breach of contract.
• Breach can be of two types – actual breach or anticipatory breach. In both cases, the
breach discharges the contract.
When a person repudiates a contract before the stipulated time for its performance has
arrived, he is deemed to have committed anticipatory breach.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 61
Example : A contracted with B to supply 100 kgs of rice on 1st June. But A failed to deliver the
same on said date. This is actual breach of contract. If time is not essential essence of contract B
can give him another date for supply of goods and he will not be liable to claim for any damages
if prior notice for the same is not given to A while giving another date.
Every promisee may dispense with or remit, wholly or in part, the performance of the
promise made to him, or may extend the time for such performance or may accept instead
of it any satisfaction which he thinks fit [Section 63].
11.8 Effects of neglect of promisee to afford promisor reasonable facilities for performance
If any promisee neglects or refuses to afford the promisor reasonable facilities for the
performance of his promise, the promisor is excused by such neglect or refusal as to any
non-performance caused thereby [Section 67].
In some situations, it is possible that inferior and superior right coincides in the same person.
In such cases, both the rights combine leading to a discharge of the contract governing the
inferior rights.
Example : A took a land on lease from B. Subsequently, A purchases that very land. Now, A
becomes the owner of the land and the ownership rights being superior to rights of a lessee, the
earlier contract of lease stands terminated.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 62
10. Overview
Refusal to accept
offer of
Obligations of performance [Sec.
parties to 38]
contracts
[Sec. 37] Refusal to perform
wholly [Sec. 39]
Promisor, Agent,
Legal Rep.
[Sec. 40]
By whom a
contract may be Liability of Joint
Third person promisor and
performed
[Sec. 41] promisee
[Sec. 42, 43 &
Time and place Joint promisors 44]
for performance [Sec. 42]
Performance [Sec. 46 to 50]
Rights of joint
of a Contract promisees
Reciprocal
Agreement to do [Sec. 45]
promises [Sec.
impossible acts
51 to 55, 57 &
[Sec. 56]
58]
Appropriation of
payments [Sec.
59, 60 & 61] Novation,
Recission,
Alteration
Contracts which
[Sec. 62]
need not be
performed
Waiver by
promisee [Sec. 63]
Discharge of a
Contract
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 63
CH-1: UNIT 5 – BREACH OF CONTRACT AND ITS REMEDIES
Learning Outcomes –
● Measurement of Damages
1. Introduction
Breach means failure of a party to perform his or her obligation under a contract.
Breach of Contract
Actual Anticipatory
● An anticipatory breach of contract is a breach of contract occurring before the time fixed for
performance has arrived.
● Anticipatory breach of a contract may take either of the following two ways:
Examples :
1) Where A contracts with B on 15th July 2020 to supply 10 bales of cotton for a specified sum on
14th August 2020 and on 30th July informs B, that he will not be able to supply the said cotton on
14th August 2020, there is an express rejection of the contract.
2) Where A agrees to sell his white horse to B for ₹ 50,000/- on 10th of August 2020, but he sells this
horse to C on 1st of August 2020, the anticipatory breach has occurred by the conduct of the
promisor.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 64
2.1 Effect of anticipatory breach
“When a party to a contract has refused to perform or disable himself from performing, his
promise in its entirety, the promisee may put an end to the contract, unless he has signified, but
words or conduct, his acquiescence in its continuance.”
i) He can rescind the contract and sue the other party for damages immediately without
waiting till the due date of performance.
ii) He may decide not to rescind the contract and treat it as still operative and wait till the
time of performance and then hold the other party responsible.
● While an anticipatory breach is before the time of performance, an actual breach of contract is on
the scheduled time of performance of the contract.
Example : A agrees to deliver 100 bags of sugar to B on 1 Feb 2020. On the said day, he failed to supply
100 bags of sugar to B. This is actual breach of contract. The breach has been committed by A at time
when performance becomes due.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 65
4. Suit for Damages
“When a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such a breach is
entitled to receive, from the party who has broken the contract, compensation for
any loss or damage caused to him thereby, which naturally arose in the usual course
of things from such breach, or which the parties knew, when they made the contract,
to be likely to result from the breach of it”.
● On the breach of the contract, the party who suffers from such a breach is entitled to
receive, from the party who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage
caused to him by breach.
● Special damages, if any, can be claimed only if the suffering party has given notice about it
earlier. Also, the party suffering a loss is expected to take reasonable steps to minimize it.
● While estimating the loss incurred, all the means which existed to remedy the inconvenience
caused by the non-performance of the contract should be considered.
Example : Yash agrees to sell and deliver 50 kilograms of rice to Rohan for ₹ 5,000. The amount
is to be paid on delivery. However, he fails to perform the promise. Rohan buys 50 kilograms of
rice from a neighbourhood trader for ₹ 7,500. Rohan can claim compensation from Yash. The
compensation amount is the additional amount that Rohan had to pay to procure the
same quantity of rice of similar quality from the market. In this case, it is ₹2,500.
4.2 Compensation for failure to discharge obligation resembling those created by contract
When an obligation resembling those created by contract has been incurred and has not been
discharged, any person injured by the failure to discharge it is entitled to receive the same
compensation from the party in default, as if such person had contracted to discharge it and
had broken his contract.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 66
4.3 Kind of Damages
Damages
Damages for
General/Or Vindictive or Pre-fixed
Special Nominal deterioration
dinary Exemplary damages
caused by delay
The damages which arise naturally in the usual course of things from breach of contract.
Example : ‘A’ delivered a machine to ‘B’, a common carrier, to be conveyed to ‘A’s mill without
delay. ‘A’ also informed ‘B’ that his mill was stopped for want of the machine. ‘B’ unreasonably
delayed the delivery of the machine, and in consequence ‘A’ lost a profitable contract with the
Government.
● In this case, ‘A’ is entitled to receive from ‘B’, by way of compensation, the average amount
of profit, which would have been made by running the mill during the period of delay.
● But, he cannot recover the loss sustained due to the loss of the Government contract, as
‘A’s contract with the Government was not brought to the notice of ‘B’.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 67
i) for breach of promise to marry, and
ii) for wrongful dishonour by a banker of his customer’s cheque (Gibbons v West Minister
Bank).
● Nominal damages are awarded where the plaintiff has proved that there has been a breach
of contract, but he has not in fact suffered any real damage.
In the case of deterioration caused to goods by delay, damages can be recovered from carrier
even without notice.
The word ‘deterioration’ not only implies physical damages to the goods, but it may also mean
loss of special opportunity for sale.
Section 74 of the Act provides that if a sum is named in a contract as the amount to be paid
in case of a breach, the aggrieved party is entitled to receive from the party at fault a reasonable
compensation not exceeding the amount so named.
Example : If the penalty provided by the contract is ₹ 1,00,000 and the actual loss because of
breach is ₹ 70,000, only ₹ 70,000 shall be available as damages, i.e., the amount of actual loss and
not the amount stipulated. But if the loss is, say, ₹ 1,50,000, then only, ₹ 1,00,000 shall be
recoverable.
● English Law makes distinction between liquidated damages and penalty, whereas Indian Law does
not make any distinction between the two.
● If the sum fixed in the contract represents a genuine pre-estimate by the parties of the loss, which
would be caused by a future breach of the contract it is liquidated damages.
● Where the sum fixed in the contract is unreasonable and is used to force the other party to
perform the contract, it is penalty.
● Section 74 of the Contract Act lays down if the parties have fixed what the damages will be, the
courts will never allow more. Thus, a person complaining of breach of contract is entitled to get
reasonable compensation and is not entitled to realise anything by way of penalty.
▪ Exception: If a party enters into a contract with the State or Central government for the
performance of an act in the interest of the general public, then a breach of such a
contract makes the party liable to pay the entire amount mentioned in the contract.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 68
Examples :
● A borrows ₹ 10,000 from B and gives him a bond for ₹ 20,000 payable by five yearly instalments
of ₹ 4,000 with a stipulation that in default of payment, the whole shall become due. This is a
stipulation by way of penalty.
● A undertakes to repay B, a loan of ₹ 10,000 by five equal monthly instalments with a stipulation
that in default of payment of any instalment, the whole shall become due. This stipulation is not
by way of penalty and the contract may be enforced according to its terms.
▪ If the sum payable is far in excess of the probable damage on breach of the contract, then it is a
penalty.
▪ If a contract mentions an amount payable at a certain date and an additional amount if a default
happens, then the additional sum is a penalty.
▪ Even if the contract specifies a sum as ‘penalty’ or ‘damages’, the Court needs to discern this from
the facts of the case
▪ In penalty, the payment intended to threaten (i.e., as a terrorem to) the offending party, whereas
Liquidated damages is a genuine pre-estimate of the damage.
▪ The Indian Courts focus on awarding a reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount fixed
in the contract and does not distinguish between the two.
5.2 Other remedies available for the breach of contract, besides claiming damages
When a contract is broken by one party, the other party may treat the contract as rescinded.
In such a case he is free from all his obligations under the contract and is entitled to
compensation for any damages that he might have suffered.
Example : A promises B to deliver 50 bags of cement on a certain day. B agrees to pay the amount
on receipt of the goods. A failed to deliver the cement on the appointed day. B is discharged from
his liability to pay the price.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 69
5.2.2 Quantum Meruit
● It covers a case where the party injured by the breach ‘Quantum Meruit’ means as
had at time of breach done part but not all of the work much as is earned/as much as
which he is bound to do under the contract and seeks the party doing the service has
to be compensated for the value of the work done. deserved.
Damages are compensatory in nature while quantum merit is restitutory (i.e., seeking to restore
the person to the position which he was in earlier).
Where damages are not an adequate remedy in the case of breach of contract, the court may
in its discretion on a suit for specific performance direct party in breach, to carry out his promise
according to the terms of the contract.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 70
5.2.4 Suit for injunction
A person who rightfully rescinds a contract is entitled to compensation for any damage which he
has sustained through non-fulfilment of the contract [Section 75].
Example : A, a singer, contracts with B, the manager of a theatre, to sing at his theatre for two
nights in every week during the next two months, and B engages to pay her ₹ 100 for each night’s
performance. On the sixth night, A wilfully absents herself from the theatre, and B, in consequence,
rescinds the contract. B is entitled to claim compensation for the damage which he has sustained
through the non-fulfilment of the contract.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 71
6 Overview
Expressly
Anticipatory
Breach
Impliedly
Ordinary
damages
Breach of
Contract
Special
damages
Vindictive
Suit for Damages
damages
Recission of Nominal
contract damages
Liquidated
damages
Remedies for Suit for Specific Prefixed
Breach of Contract performance damages
Penalty
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 72
CH-1: UNIT 6 – CONTINGENT AND QUASI CONTRACTS
Learning Outcomes –
1. Contingent Contracts
A contract may be absolute or a contingent. An Absolute contract is one where the promisor
undertakes to perform the contract in any event without any condition.
• In simple words, contingent contracts, are the ones where the promisor perform his obligation only
when certain conditions are met.
• The contracts of insurance, indemnity, and guarantee are some examples of contingent
contracts.
Collateral event – An event which is neither a performance directly promised as part of the
contract, nor the whole of the consideration for a promise [Pollock and Mulla].
Example : A contracts to pay B ₹100,000 if B’s house is burnt. This is a contingent contract.
▪ Here the burning of the B’s house is neither a performance promised as part of the contract nor
it is the consideration obtained from B. Thus, the burning of the house is the collateral event.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 73
i) The performance of a contingent contract would depend upon the happening or non-
happening of some event or condition.
ii) An event collateral to the contract - The event is not part of the contract. The event should
be neither performance promised nor a consideration for a promise.
Examples :
▪ A agrees to deliver 100 bags of wheat and B agrees to pay the price only afterwards. This
is a conditional contract and not contingent because the event on which B’s obligation is
made to depend is part of the promise itself and not a collateral event.
▪ A agreed to construct a swimming pool for B for ₹ 200,000. And B agreed to make the
payment only on the completion of the swimming pool. It is not a contingent contract as
the event (i.e. construction of the swimming pool) is directly connected with the contract.
iii) The contingent event should not be a mere ‘will’ of the promisor - The event should be
contingent in addition to being the will of the promisor.
Example : If A promises to pay B ₹100,000 if it rains on 1st April and A leave Delhi for Mumbai on
a particular day, it is a contingent contract, because going to Mumbai is an event no doubt within
A’s will, but raining is not merely his will.
iv) The event must be uncertain - If the performance of the contract is dependent on an event,
which is although a future event, but certain and sure to happen, then it will not be considered
as a contingent contract.
Example : A agreed to sell his agricultural land to B after obtaining the necessary permission
from the collector. As a matter of course, the permission was generally granted on the fulfilment
of certain formalities. It was held that the contract was not a contingent contract as the grant of
permission by the collector was almost a certainty.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 74
Example : A contracts to pay B a sum of money when B marries C. C dies without being married to
B. The Contract becomes void.
Where a contingent contract is made to do or not do anything if an uncertain future event does not
happen, it can be enforced only when the happening of that event becomes impossible and
not before.
Example : Where Rohit agrees to pay Mohan, ₹10,000 if a particular ship ‘Titanic’ does not return,
the contract becomes enforceable only if the ship sinks so that it cannot return.
2.3 A contract which is contingent upon the conduct of a living person [Section 34]
If a contract is contingent upon as to how a person will act at an unspecified time, the event
shall be considered to have become impossible when such person does anything which renders
it impossible that he should so act within any definite time or otherwise than under further
contingencies.
Example : ‘A’ agrees to pay ‘B’ a sum of money if ‘B’ marries ‘C’. ‘C’ marries ‘D’. This act of ‘C’ has
rendered the event of ‘B’ marrying ‘C’ as impossible; it is though possible if there is divorce between
‘C’ and ‘D’.
2.4 Contingent on happening of specified event within the fixed time [Section 35]
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 75
Example : Rohit promises to pay Mohan ₹10,000, if a certain ship ‘Titanic’ returns within a year. The
contract may be enforced if the ship returns within the year, and becomes void if the ship is burnt
within the year.
2.5 Contingent on specified event not happening within fixed time [Section 35]
Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything, if a specified uncertain event does not happen
within a fixed time, may be enforced by law when
• The time fixed has expired, and such event has not happened or
• Before the time fixed has expired if it becomes certain that such event will not happen.
Example : Rohit promises to pay Mohan ₹10,000, if a certain ship ‘Titanic’ does not return within a
year. The contract may be enforced if the ship does not return within the year, or is burnt within the
year.
Example : ‘A’ agrees to pay ‘B’ ₹1,00,000/- if sun rises in the west next morning. This is an impossible
event and hence void.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 76
collateral event happening or to an uncertain event
not happening. happening or not happening.
Reciprocal May not contain reciprocal Consists of reciprocal
promises promises. promises.
Uncertain event Uncertain event is collateral. Uncertain event is the core
factor.
Nature of contract Contingent contract may not A wagering agreement is
be wagering in nature. essentially contingent in
nature.
Interest of Contracting parties have Contracting parties have no
contracting parties interest in the subject matter interest in the subject matter.
in contingent contract.
Doctrine of Contingent contract is not A wagering contract is a
mutuality of lose based on doctrine of game, losing and gaining
and gain mutuality of lose and gain. alone matters.
Effect of contract Valid Void
4. Quasi Contracts
• Even in the absence of a contract, certain social relationships give rise to certain specific
obligations to be performed by certain persons. These are known as quasi contracts as they
create same obligations as in the case of regular contract.
• Such cases are not contract in the strict sense, but the Court recognises them as relations
resembling those of contracts and enforces them as if they were contracts. Hence the term Quasi-
contracts (i.e. resembling a contract).
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 77
✓ Salient features of quasi contracts
Under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, the relationship of quasi contract is deemed to have
come to existence in five different circumstances. In none of these cases there comes into existence
any contract between the parties in the real sense. Due to peculiar circumstances in which they are
placed, the law imposes in each of these cases the contractual liability.
Obligation of a
person enjoying
benefit of a non-
gratutious right
Payment by an [Sec. 72] Responsibility of
interested finder of good
person [Sec. 69] [Sec. 71]
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 78
4.1.1. Claim for necessaries supplied to persons incapable of contracting [Section 68]
If a person, incapable of entering into a contract, or anyone whom he is legally bound to support,
is supplied by another person with necessaries suited to his condition in life, the person who
has furnished such supplies is entitled to be reimbursed from the property of such
incapable person.
Example : A supplies B, a lunatic, or a minor, with necessaries suitable to his condition in life. A
is entitled to be reimbursed from B’s property. To establish his claim, the supplier must prove
that –
✓ The goods were supplied to the person who was minor or a lunatic and
✓ Also, that they were suitable to his actual requirements at the time of the sale and delivery.
A person who is interested in the payment of money which another is bound by law to pay,
and who therefore pays it, is entitled to be reimbursed by the other.
Example : B holds land in Bengal, on a lease granted by A, the zamindar. The revenue payable by
A to the Government being in arrear, his land is advertised for sale by the Government. Under
the revenue law, the consequence of the sale will be the annulment of B’s lease.
B, to prevent the sale and the consequent annulment of his own lease, pays to the government
the sum due from A. A is bound to make good to B, the amount so paid.
• Where a person lawfully does anything for another person, or delivers anything to him
not intending to do so gratuitously and such other person enjoys the benefit thereof,
the latter is bound to pay compensation to the former in respect of, or to restore, the thing
so done or delivered.
▪ That he had done the act or had delivered the thing lawfully,
Example : A, a tradesman, leaves goods at B’s house by mistake. B treats the goods as his own. He
is bound to pay A for them.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 79
Case Law: Shyam Lal vs. State of U.P.
Facts: ‘K’ a government servant was compulsorily retired by the government. He filed a writ
petition and obtained an injunction against the order. He was reinstated and was paid salary
but was given no work and in the meantime government went on appeal.
Judgement: Appeal was decided in favour of government and ‘K’ was directed to return the
salary paid to him during period of reinstatement.
A person who finds goods belonging to another and takes them into his custody is subject to
same responsibility as if he were a bailee. Thus, a finder of lost goods has:
i) to take proper care of the property as man of ordinary prudence would take,
Example : ‘P’ a customer in ‘D’s shop puts down a brooch worn on her coat and forgets to pick it
up and one of ‘D’s assistants finds it and puts it in a drawer over the weekend. On Monday, it was
discovered to be missing. ‘D’ was held to be liable in the absence of ordinary care which a prudent
man would have taken.
A person to whom money has been paid or anything delivered by mistake or under coercion,
must repay or return it.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 80
Judgements made in few Cases
Shivprasad Vs Sirish Chandra - Every kind of payment of money or delivery of goods for every
type of ‘mistake’ is recoverable.
Sales tax officer vs. Kanhaiyalal - A payment of municipal tax made under mistaken belief or
because of mis-understanding of the terms of lease can be recovered from municipal
authorities.
Seth Khanjelek vs National Bank of India - Any money paid by coercion is also recoverable. The
word coercion is not necessarily governed by section 15 of the Act, rather, it is interpreted to
mean and include oppression, extortion, or such other means.
Facts: ‘T’ was traveling without ticket in a tram car and on checking he was asked to pay ₹5/- as
penalty to compound transaction. T filed a suit against the corporation for recovery on the
ground that it was extorted from him.
Judgement: The suit was decreed in T’s favour.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 81
5. Overview
Contingent
Quasi Contracts
Contracts
Contingent on an Payment by an
event not happening interest person
[Sec. 33] [Sec. 69]
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 82
CH 1 - UNIT 7: CONTRACT OF INDEMNITY AND GUARANTEE
Learning Outcomes –
• Identify special type of contracts i.e., Indemnity contracts and guarantee contracts and also the
nature of obligations and rights of each of the parties to the contracts.
• Explain distinction between these contracts.
INTRODUCTION
Contract of Indemnity and Guarantee are the specific types of contacts provided under Sections 124 to
147 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. In addition to the specific provisions, the general principles of
contracts are also applicable to such contracts.
CONTRACT OF INDEMNITY
Section 124 and 125 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides provisions relating to contract of
indemnity.
The term Contract of Indemnity is defined u/s 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as “a contract
by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor
himself, or by the conduct of any other person.”
→ “Existence of loss” is essential – unless the promisee has suffered a loss, he cannot hold
the promisor liable on the contract of indemnity.
→ Such loss is caused by:
• Conduct of the promisor himself, or
• Conduct of any other person
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 83
Note: The loss occasioned by an accident not caused by any person, or an act of God/ natural event, is not
covered.
case law:
In case of Gajanan Moreshwar v/s Moreshwar Madan (1942), decision is taken on the basis of
English Law. As per English Law, Indemnity means promise to save another harmless from the
loss. Here it covers every loss whether due to negligence of promisee or by natural calamity or by
accident.
Mode of
Contract of
Indemnity
Express Implied
contract contract
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 84
2.5 Rights of Indemnity holder when sued [Section 125]
Note: These rights are not exhaustive. Indemnity holder may claim any other liability (absolute in
nature) that he has incurred.
The liability of an indemnifier commences as soon as the liability of the indemnity holder
becomes absolute and certain.
CONTRACT OF GUARANTEE
Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides provisions relating to contract of guarantee.
A contract of guarantee is a contract to perform the promise made or discharge the liability, of
a third person in case of his default.
Principal debtor
Creditor - Person
Surety - Person - Person in
to whom the
who gives the respect of whose
guarantee is
guarantee default the
given
gurantee is given
Hence, the contract of guarantee is a triplicate agreement between principal debtor, creditor, and
surety. There are, in effect 3 contracts –
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 85
3) An implied contract between the surety and the principal debtor whereby principal debtor
is under an obligation to indemnify the surety.
Principal debt
• It is the essence of the guarantee that there should be someone liable as a principal
debtor and surety undertakes to be liable on his default. If there is principal debt,
there can be no valid guarantee.
Consideration
• A guarantee without consideration is void, but there is no need for direct a direct
consideration between surety and the creditor.
• Consideration received by the principal debtor is sufficient consideration to the
surety for giving the guarantee, but past consideration is no consideration for the
contract of guarantee. [Sec. 127]
Existence of a liabilty
• There must be an existing liability or a promise whose performance is guaranteed.
• Such liability or promise must be enforceable by law and not time barred
No misrepresentation or concealment
• Any guarantee which has been obtained by the means of misrepresentation made
by the creditor, or with his knowledge and assent, concerning a material part of the
transaction, is invalid [Sec. 142]
• Any guarantee which the creditor has obtained by means of keeping silence as to
material circumstances, is invalid [Sec. 143]
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 86
TYPES OF GUARANTEE
Types of
guarantee
Continuing
Specific
guarantee
guarantee
[Sec. 129]
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 87
Competency to All parties must be competent In case of a contract of
contract to contract. guarantee, where a minor is a
principal debtor, the contract is
still valid.
Section 128 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides provisions relating to the liability of the surety.
✓ The liability of the surety is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor unless it is otherwise
provided by the contract. This means that the surety is liable for what the principal debtor is
liable.
✓ The liability of a surety arises only on default by the principal debtor. If there is a condition
precedent for surety’s liability, the surety would be liable only when such condition is fulfilled.
✓ Where a debtor cannot be held liable on account of any defect in the document, the liability
of the surety also ceases.
✓ Surety’s liability continues if the principal debtor has not been sued or omitted from being sued
i.e., the creditor has a right to sue the surety directly without first proceeding against
principal debtor.
Where two persons contract with a third person to undertake a certain liability, and also contract
with each other that one of them shall be liable only on the default of the other (Guarantee), the
creditor cannot sue the guarantor, even if he is aware of such second contract because he is
not party to such contract. The two debtors shall hold the same liability as per primary contract.
Section 132 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states the liability of a guarantor in a case where creditor is not a
party to a guarantee.
Example: A and B make a joint and several promissory note to C. A makes it, in fact, as surety for
B, and C knows this at the time when the note is made. The fact that A, to the knowledge of C,
made the note as surety for B, is no answer to a suit by C against A upon the note.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 88
DISCHARGE OF A SURETY
Modes of discharge of
surety
By revocation of On invalidation
By conduct of
the contract of of contract of
the creditor
guarantee guarantee
Revocation of specific guarantee: only if liability to principal debtor has not accrued.
Example: A guarantees to B, to the extent of 100,000 rupees, that C shall pay all the bills that B shall draw
upon him. B draws upon C Rs. 20000. C accepts the bill. A gives notice of revocation. C dishonours the bill at
maturity. A is liable upon his guarantee to pay Rs. 20000.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 89
8.1.3 Revocation by novation [Sec. 62]
The surety under original contract is discharged if a fresh contract is entered into either
between the same parties or between the other parties, the consideration being the mutual
discharge of the old contract.
Note: Variation which is not substantial or material or which is beneficial to the surety will not discharge him
of his liability [M.S Anirudhan v Thomco’s Bank Ltd.]. This exception has however, got limited application in
situations similar to facts of this case.
a) Enters into a fresh/new contract with principal debtor, by which the principal debtor is
released, or
b) Does any act or omission, the legal consequence of which is the discharge of the
principal debtor.
8.2.3 Discharge of surety when creditor compounds with, gives time to, or agrees not to sue,
principal debtor [Sec. 135]
• Composition: If the creditor makes a composition with the principal debtor, without
consulting the surety, the latter is discharged.
• Promise to give time: When the creditor allows the principal debtor more time for payment
of debt, the surety is discharged.
• Promise not to sue: If the creditor under an agreement with the principal debtor promises
not to sue him, the surety is discharged.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 90
8.2.4 Discharge of surety by creditor’s act or omission impairing surety’s eventual remedy [Sec. 139]
If the creditor does any act/omits to do an act, which is inconsistent with the rights of the surety,
then the surety is discharged.
In a Supreme Court Case, it was decided that - A bank granted a loan on the security of the
stock in the godown. The loan was also guaranteed by the surety. The goods were lost from the
godown on account of the negligence of the bank officials. The surety was discharged to the
extent of the value of the stock so lost.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 91
RIGHTS OF SURETY
Rights of a surety
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 92
CH 1 - UNIT 8: BAILMENT AND PLEDGE
Learning Outcomes –
WHAT IS BAILMENT?
Parties to
bailment
Bailor Bailee
1.3.1 Contract
• Bailment is based upon a contract.
• The contract may be express or implied.
• No consideration is necessary to create a valid contract of bailment.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 93
1.3.3 Purpose
• The goods are delivered for some purpose.
• The purpose may be express or implied.
1.3.4 Possession
• In bailment, possession of goods changes. Change of possession can happen by physical
delivery or by any action that has the effect of placing the goods in the possession of
bailee.
• The change of possession does not lead to change of ownership.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 94
2.1.1 Disclose known facts [Section 150]
→ In case of gratuitous bailment: The bailor is bound to disclose to the bailee faults in the goods
bailed of which the bailor is aware, and which materially interfere with the use of them, or expose
the bailee to extraordinary risks.
If he does not make such disclosure, he is responsible for damage arising to the bailee directly
for such faults
→ In case of non-gratuitous bailment: If the goods are bailed for hire, the bailor is responsible
for such damage, whether or not he was aware of the existence of such faults in goods bailed.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 95
2.2 Rights of bailor
A contract of bailment is
voidable at the option of the
Right to terminate
bailor, if the bailor does any act
the bailment [Sec.
with regard to the goods bailed,
153]
inconsistent with the conditions
of bailment
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 96
→ Exception: In the absence of any special contract, the bailee is not responsible for the loss,
destruction or deterioration of the thing bailed, if he has taken reasonable care as required
u/s 151 [Sec. 152]
3.1.2 Not to make inconsistent use of goods [Sec. 153 & 154]
→ If the bailee makes use of any goods bailed, which is not according to the terms & conditions
of the bailment, he is liable to compensate the bailor for any loss or destruction of goods
[Sec. 153]
→ A contract of bailment is voidable at the option of the bailor, if the bailee uses the goods
inconsistently [Sec. 154]
3.1.3 Not to mix the goods [Sec. 155, 156 & 157]
→ If the bailee mixes the goods bailed with his own goods, with the consent of the bailor:
Both the parties shall have an interest in proportion to their respective shares in the mixture
thus produced [Sec. 155].
→ If the bailee mixes the goods bailed with his own goods without the consent of the
bailor,
o Goods can be separated or divided: The property of goods remains in the parties
respectively.
However, the bailee shall bear the expenses of separation or division and any damage
arising from the mixture [Sec. 156].
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 97
3.2 Rights of a bailee
Note: Duties of bailee corresponds with rights of bailor and duties of bailor relates to the rights of bailee.
If a third person wrongfully deprives the bailee of the use or possession of the goods bailed,
or does them any injury, the bailee is entitled to use such remedies as the owner might have used
in the like case if no bailment had been made; and either the bailor or the bailee may bring a suit
against a third person for such deprivation or injury [Sec. 180].
Whatever is obtained by way of relief or compensation in any such suit shall, as between the bailor
and the bailee, be dealt with according to their respective interests [Sec. 181].
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 98
TERMINATION OF BAILMENT
On expiry
of
stipulated
period
Destruction On
of the fulfillment
subject of the
matter Circumstances purpose
where contract
of bailment is
terminated
By death
in case of
By notice*
gratuitious
bailment
* where bailee acts in manner inconsistent with terms or where it is gratuitous bailment
6.1 Right of finder of lost goods to sue for specific reward offered [Sec. 168]
✓ The finder of goods has no right to sue the owner for compensation for trouble and expense
voluntarily incurred by him to preserve the goods and to find out the owner.
✓ but he may retain the goods against the owner until he receives such compensation.
✓ and, where the owner has offered a specific reward for the return
of goods lost, the finder may sue for such reward, and may retain the Right to collect
goods until he receives it. reward is a primary and
6.2 When finder of thing commonly on sale may sell it [Sec. 169]: a superior right even
more than the right to
→ Owner: seek reimbursement of
o cannot with reasonable diligence be found, or expenditure.
o if he refuses, upon demand, to pay lawful charges of the finder, and
→ when the thing is in danger of perishing or of losing the greater part
of its value, or
lawful charges of the finder in respect of the thing found amount to two-thirds of its value.
1FIN BY INDIGOLEARN 99
GENERAL AND PARTICULAR LIEN
RIGHT OF LIEN: Lien is the right of a person to retain the goods belonging to another until his claim is
satisfied or some debt due to him is repaid.
Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 170 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
confer on the bailee the right to general lien. confer on the bailee the right to particular
lien.
Examples: Examples:
• X becomes insolvent. Y is appointed as • A delivers a rough diamond to B, a
the official assignee to recover value from jeweller, to be cut and polished, which is
the assets of X. Here Y has general lien on all accordingly done. B is entitled to retain the
the assets of X. stone till he is paid for the services he has
rendered.
• A took a loan of Rs. 5 lacs from bank
against a security worth Rs. 7 lacs. On • A gives cloth to B, a tailor, to make into a
defaulting to repay the loan, the bank sold coat. B promises A to deliver the coat as
the security and recovered only 4 lacs from soon as it is finished, and to give a three
market. The Bank can now recover months’ credit for the price. B is not entitled
remaining 1 lac from general lien on other to retain the coat until he is paid.
assets of A.
General lien relates to the right to keep Particular lien implies a right of the bailee to
possession of goods belonging to another retain specific goods bailed for non-
against general balance of account. payment of amount.
It can be exercised against goods even It comes into play in situations involving
without involvement of labour or skill. exercise of labour or skill in respect of
goods bailed.
Only such persons as are specified u/s 171, Bailee, finder of goods, pledgee, unpaid
e.g., Bankers, factors, wharfingers, policy seller, agent, partner etc. are entitled to
brokers etc. are entitled to general lien. particular lien.
The bailment of goods as security for payment of a debt or performance of a promise is called
pledge.
Parties to pledge
Pawnor Pawnee
There shall be a
There shall be
bailment for
The subject Goods pledged the delivery of
security against
matter of for shall be in goods from
payment or
pledge is goods existence pledger to
performance of
pledgee
the promise
•Pawnee may retain the goods pledged, not only for payment of debt or performance of
the promise, but for the interest, of the debt, and all necessary expenses incurred by him
in respect of the possession or preservation of the goods pledged
•Pawnee has a right to retain the goods pledged towards subsequent advances as well,
however subject to such right being specifically contemplated in the contract.
•Pawnee is entitled to receive from the pawnor extraordinary expenses incurred by him
for the preservation of the goods pledged.
•If pawnor makes default in payment of the debt, or performance, at the stipulated time
of the promise, in respect of the goods pledged, pawnee may bring a suit against the
pawnor, and retain the goods pledged as a collateral security; or he may sell the thing
pledged on giving the pawn or reasonable notice of the sale.
•If the proceeds of such sale are less than the amount due in respect of the debt or
promise, the pawnor is still liable to pay the balance. If the proceeds of the sale are
greater than the amount so due, the pawnee shall pay over the surplus to the pawnor.
To take
reasonable
care of the
pledged
goods Not to make
To return
unauthorised
accretion to
use of
the goods, if
pledged
any
goods
Duties of
the pawnee
To return goods
Not to do any
when the debt
act which is
has been repaid
inconsistent
or the promise
with the terms
has been
of the pledge
Not to mix performed
his own goods
with goods
pledged
As a bailor of goods pawnor has all the rights of the bailor. Along with that he also has the right
to redemption to the pledged goods which is enumerated u/s 177.
Right to redeem [Section 177] : If a time is stipulated for the payment of the debt, or performance
of the promise, for which the pledge is made, and the pawnor makes default in payment of the
debt or performance of the promise at the stipulated time, he may redeem the goods pledged
at any subsequent time before the actual sale of them; but he must, in that case, pay, in addition,
any expenses which have arisen from his default.
To compensate the
To pay the deficit, if pawnee for any
the pawnee sells the extraordinary
goods due to default expenses incurred by
by the pawnor him for preserving the
goods
To indemnify the
To disclose all the
pawnee if any loss
faults which may put
occurs to the pawnee
the pawnee under
due to defect in
extraordinary risks
pawnor's title to goods
PLEDGE BY NON-OWNERS
Ordinarily it is the owner of goods, or any other person authorized by him in that behalf, who can
pledge the goods. But in order to facilitate mercantile transactions, the law has recognised certain
exceptions –
Pledge by
person in Pledge where
Pledge by Pledge by
possession pawnor has Pledge by a
mercantile seller or
under only a limited co-owner in
agent buyer in
voidable interest possession
[Sec. 178] possession
contract [Sec. 179]
[Sec. 178A]
Basis of
Bailment Pledge
distinction
Meaning Transfer of goods by one person Transfer of goods by one person
to another for some specific to another as security for
purpose. repayment of debt.
Right to sell the Bailee has no right to sell the Pawnee has the right to sell the
goods goods even if charges of bailment goods if the pawnor fails to
are not paid to him. Bailee’s rights redeem the goods.
are restricted to suing the bailor
or exercising lien.
Right to use of Bailee can use the goods only for Pawnee cannot use the goods
goods specified purpose and not pledged.
otherwise.
• Learning Outcomes –
• Understand the relationship between agent and principal and the intention behind adoption of
such course of agency.
• Understand rights and obligations of an agent as well as the circumstances under which the agent
is personally liable for the acts done by him on behalf of the principal and the legal position of
the agent, the principal and the third parties involved.
• Identify with the terms ‘sub-agent’ and ‘substituted agent’ and to distinguish between the two.
INTRODUCTION
A relationship of agency is established when one party (agent) is authorized by another party (principal)
to act on his/ her behalf. Such relationships are initiated when one party desires to extend his/her
activities beyond his/her present limits or capacity. The law of agency is contained in sections 182 to
238 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
WHAT IS AGENCY?
Section 182 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines Agent and Principal.
Principal
Test of agency:
a) Whether the person has the capacity to bind the principal and make him answerable to
the third party.
b) Whether he can establish privity of contract between the principal and third parties.
If the answer to these questions is in affirmative, then there is a relationship of agency.
* According to Sec. 184, any person may become an agent i.e. a minor or a person of unsound mind may
become an agent and the principal shall be bound by his acts. But in case of his misconduct or negligence, the
principal shall not be able to proceed against him.
CREATION OF AGENCY
Agency by When an agent has without authority done acts or incurred obligations to
estoppel third persons on behalf of his principal, the principal is bound by such acts or
[Sec. 237] obligations if he has by his words or conduct induced such third parties to
believe that such acts and obligations were within the scope of the agent’s
authority.
Agency by Where an agent is authorised to do certain act, and while doing such an act,
necessity an emergency arises, he acquires an extra-ordinary or special authority to
prevent his principal from loss.
Example: Raja has a large farm on which Shyam is the caretaker. When Raja
is in Canada, there is a huge fire on the farm. Shyam becomes an agent of
necessity for Raja so as to save the property from being destroyed by fire.
Raja (the principal) will be liable for any expenses, Shyam (his agent of
necessity) incurred to put out the fire.
Agency by Ratification means approving a previous act or transaction. Where acts are
ratification done by one person on behalf of another, but without his knowledge or
[Sec. 196] authority he may elect to ratify or disown it. Ratification will make the agency
valid. Ratification may be express or implied by the conduct.
Example: X who is Y’s agent has on 10th January 2019 purchases goods from
Z on credit without Y’s permission. After the purchase, on 20th January 2019,
Y tells X that he will accept responsibility to pay for the purchases although at
the time of purchase the agent had no authority to buy on credit.
✓ The authority of an agent means his capacity to bind the principal to third parties. The
agent can bind the principal only if he acts within the scope of his authority.
✓ The agent’s authority is governed by two principles –
o In normal circumstances and
o In emergency.
Scope of agent's
authority
SUB-AGENTS
A sub-agent is a person employed by, and acting under the control of, the original agent in the
business of agency.
An agent cannot lawfully employ another person to perform acts which he has expressly or
impliedly undertaken to perform personally, unless by the ordinary custom of trade a sub-agent may,
or from the nature of the agency, sub-agent must be employed.
Original
appointment
authorises such
appointment
Circumstances
where sub-
agents can be
appointed
Customs of trade
Unforeseen
may allow sub
emergency arises
agency
Substituted agent is a person appointed by the agent to act for the principal, in the business of
agency, with the knowledge and consent of the principal. They are not sub-agents. They are agents
of the principal.
7.1 Relation between principal and person duly appointed by agent to act in business
of agency [Section 194]:
Where an agent, holding an express or implied authority to name another person to act for the principal
in the business of the agency, has named another person accordingly, such person is substitute agent
for the business entrusted. Principal is bound by his actions.
Example: A directs B, his solicitor, to sell his estate by auction, and to employ an auctioneer for the
purpose. B names C, an auctioneer, to conduct the sale. C is not a sub-agent but is A’s agent for the conduct
of the sale.
Example: A instructs B, a merchant, to buy a ship for him. B employs a ship surveyor of good reputation to
choose a ship for A. The surveyor makes the choice negligently and the ship turns out to be unseaworthy and
is lost. B is not, but the surveyor is, responsible to A.
In selecting such agent for his principal, an agent is bound to exercise the same amount of discretion
as a man of ordinary prudence. If done so, agent is not responsible to Principal in case of negligence
of the substituted agent.
Note: Both a sub-agent and a substituted agent are appointed by the agent.
Agent
Note: Secret profit means any advantage obtained by the agent over and above his agreed
remuneration and which he would not have been able to make without his position as an agent.
9.1.9 Duty not to use confidential information received in the course of agency against the principal
Right to indemnity
Right of Where one person employs another
Right of indemnification against acts
indemnification for to do an act which is criminal, the
done in good faith upon instructions
lawful acts employer is not liable to the agent
of principal [Section 223]
[Section 222] [Section 224]
9.2.1 Conditions subject to which agent can exercise the right of lien on principal’s property
a) Agent should be lawfully entitled to receive remuneration/commission from the
principal.
b) Property belongs to the principal.
c) Property have been received by the agent in his capacity as agent and during the course
of his ordinary duties as agent.
d) Agent has only a particular/specific lien.
Note: Agent’s right to lien is lost when possession of property is lost, when agent waives his right
or when agent’s lien is subject to a contrary contract.
Principal is liable for, or bound by, the acts of the agent as per authority given in contract. Legal
consequences and obligations born by principal as if he entered into contract himself.
10.2 Principal not bound, when agent exceeds authority [Section 227]
In such situation part of the contract, which is as per authority, shall be binding on the principal.
10.3 Principal is not bound when excess of agent’s authority is not separable [Section
228].
Where an agent does more than he is authorised to do, and what he does is beyond the scope of his
authority cannot be separated from what is within it, the principal is not bound to recognize the
transaction.
Exception: Principal shall be liable to third parties for inducing belief that agent’s
unauthorized acts were authorized [Section 237].
Any notice given to or information obtained by agent during course of business, shall have the same
legal consequence as if it had been given to or obtained by the principal.
→ Misrepresentation by agents acting in the course of their business for their principals,
have the same effect as if such misrepresentations or frauds had been made, or committed,
by the principals.
→ Misrepresentations made, or frauds committed, by agents, in matters which do not
fall within their authority, do not affect their principals.
11.1 Agent cannot personally enforce, nor be bound by, contracts on behalf of principal
[Section 230]
Section 230
Exceptions - When
agent is personally
bound
Sale or purchase of
Principal is
goods for a merchant Agent does not Pretended agent or
minor/incompeten
resident abroad/ disclose the name agent exceeds
t to contract/non-
foreign principal by of his principal. authority
existent.
agent.
✓ If an agent makes a contract with a person who does not know/suspect that he is an agent,
the other contracting party has, as against the principal, the same right as he would have
had as against the agent if the agent had been the principal.
✓ If the principal discloses himself before the contract is completed, the other
contracting party may refuse to fulfil the contract, if he can show that, if he had known who
the principal in the contract was, he would not have entered into the contract.
Where one man makes a contract with another, neither knowing nor having reasonable ground to
suspect that the other is an agent, the principal, if he requires the performance of the contract, can
only obtain such performance subject to the rights and obligations subsisting between the agent
and the other party to the contract.
11.4 Option of the third person to sue the agent or the principal
→ and thereby including a third person to deal with him as such agent,
→ is liable, if his alleged employer does not ratify his acts,
→ to make compensation to another in respect of any loss or damage which he has
incurred by so dealing.
11.6 Person falsely contracting as agent, not entitled to performance [Section 236]
A person with whom a contract has been entered into in the character of agent, is not entitled to
require the performance of it if he was acting, not as agent, but on his own account.
Death or
On expiry of time
Renunciation insanity of
Completion Principal's for which agent
Revocation by agents the
of business insolvency has been
[Sec. 206]* principal or
appointed
agent
*An agent may renounce the business of agency in the same manner in which the principal has the right of
revocation
Example: A gives authority to B to sell A’s land, and to pay himself, out of the proceeds, the debts due to
him from A. A cannot revoke this authority, nor can it be terminated by his insanity or death.
The termination of the authority of an agent does not, so far as regards the agent, take effect before
it becomes known to him, or so far as regards third persons, before it becomes known to them.
12.4 Agent’s duty on termination of agency by principal’s death or insanity [Section 209]
When an agency is terminated by the principal dying or becoming of unsound mind, the agent is bound
to take on behalf of the representatives of his late principal, all reasonable steps for the protection
and preservation of the interests entrusted to him.
The termination of the authority of an agent causes the termination (subject to the rules herein
contained regarding the termination of an agent’s authority) of the authority of all sub-agents
appointed by him.
Learning Outcomes –
● Ascertainment of Price.
1. Introduction
● Sale of Goods Act, 1930 is an Act to define and amend the law relating to the sale of goods.
● It extends to the whole of India. Since 2019, it also applicable to Jammu & Kashmir
● The provisions of the Act are applicable to the contracts related to the sale of goods.
The Act is not applicable for the sale of immovable properties like land, shop, or house etc.
Sale of immovable properties comes under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Contract of Sale of Goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in
goods to the buyer for a price (consideration).
The general provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 apply to a Contract of Sale of Goods in so far as they
are not inconsistent with the express provisions of the Sale of Goods Act.
● Contract of Sale of Goods - A contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers
or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price [Section 4(1)].
o Where under a contract of sale, the property in the goods is transferred from the seller to
the buyer, the contract is called a sale,
o But where the transfer of the property in the goods is to take place at a future time or
subject to some condition thereafter to be fulfilled, it is called an agreement to sell.
[Section 4(3)]
● An agreement to sell becomes a sale when the time elapses or the conditions are fulfilled
subject to which the property in the goods is to be transferred. [Section 4(4)]
Example : X agrees to sell his car to Y for ₹ 2,00,000 after one month. Y agrees to buy the car and
make the payment after one month. This is an agreement to sell and it will become a sale after one
month when X makes the payment and gets the ownership of the car .
The following elements must co-exist so as to constitute a contract of sale of goods under the
Sale of Goods Act, 1930 –
Two parties The seller and the buyer are the two must be parties and
should be different persons.
Subject Matter Goods, covering only moveable property can be the subject
matter of contract. May be existing goods or future goods.
Absolute or
Conditional A contract of sale may be absolute or conditional.
Transfer of property The property in the goods passes to Property in the goods passes to the
the buyer immediately. buyer on future date or on fulfilment
of some condition.
Remedies for breach The seller can sue the buyer for the The aggrieved party can sue for
price of the goods because of the damages only and not for the price
passing of the property therein to unless the price was payable at a
the buyer. stated date.
Burden of risk Risk of loss is that of the buyer since Risk of loss is that of the seller.
risk follows ownership.
Nature of rights Creates Jus in rem i.e. right against a Creates Jus in personam i.e. right
thing. against a person.
Right of resale The seller cannot resell the goods. The seller may sell the goods since
ownership is with the seller.
In case of insolvency of The official assignee will not be able The official assignee will acquire
seller to take over the goods but will control over the goods, but the price
recover the price from the buyer. will not be recoverable.
In case of insolvency of The official assignee will have The official assignee will not have
buyer control over the goods. any control over the goods.
4. Definitions
✔ includes stock (bundle of shares) and shares, Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDR)
growing crops, grass, and things attached to or are considered as goods under
forming part of the land, which are agreed to be Section 176 of the Indian
severed before sale or under the contract of sale. Contract Act read with Section
2(7) of the Sale of Goods Act.
✔ Eg: Cars, food, mobiles, clothes, crops, trees that can
be severed from earth, timber, etc
● ‘Actionable claims’ are claims, which can be enforced only by an action or suit [E.g., Debt i.e
debts on which some action can be claimed]. Actionable claims can be transferred but cannot
be sold.
● Money in circulation cannot be goods but currency notes and coins not in circulation and
collected by numismatists shall be considered as goods.
● “Goods” include both tangible goods and intangible goods like goodwill, copyrights, patents,
trademarks etc.
● Stock and shares, gas, steam, water, electricity, and decree of the court are also considered
to be goods.
Classification of Goods
Contingent
Existing Goods Future Goods
Goods
● Existing Goods are such goods which are in existence at the time of the contract of sale,
i.e., those owned or possessed or acquired by the seller at the time of contract of sale
[Section 6].
b) Ascertained Goods –
Those goods which are identified in accordance with the agreement after the
contract of sale is made. When from a lot or out of large quantity of unascertained
goods, the number or quantity contracted for is identified, such identified goods are
called ascertained goods.
Example : Raj has 500 apples. Out of these 500 apples, Raj decides to sell 200 apples. To
sell these 200 apples, Raj will need to separate them from the 500 (larger set). Thus, Raj
selects 200 apples from a larger group of unspecified apples. These 200 apples are now
the ascertained goods.
c) Unascertained goods –
Goods which are not specifically identified or ascertained at the time of making of the
contract. They are indicated or defined only by description or sample.
Example : Say, from Raj’s 500 apples, he decides to sell 200 apples but doesn’t specify
which ones he wants to sell. A seller will have the liberty to choose any 200 apples from
the lot. These are thus the unascertained goods.
Future Goods means goods to be manufactured or produced or acquired by the seller after
making the contract of sale.
A contract for the sale of future goods is always an agreement to sell. It is never actual
sale because a person cannot transfer what is not in existence.
Example : P agrees to sell to Q all the milk that his cow may yield during the coming year. This is
a contract for the sale of future goods.
Example : Amit is a manufacturer of chairs. Shyam ordered Amit to manufacture 200 units of
chairs of specific design and they made an agreement for the same. This is the sale with respect
to future goods.
● The acquisition of which by the seller depends upon an uncertain contingency (uncertain
event) are called contingent goods.
● Like the future goods, in the case of contingent goods also, the property does not pass to
the buyer at the time of making the contract.
Example : A agrees to sell to B a Picasso painting provided he is able to purchase it from its
present owner. This is a contract for the sale of contingent goods.
Example : P contracts to sell 50 pieces of particular article provided the ship which is bringing
them reaches the port safely. This is an agreement for the sale of contingent goods.
● The transfer of possession is the end result of the whole delivery process. The delivery
could occur even when the goods are transferred to a person other than the buyer but
who is authorized to hold goods on behalf of the buyer.
Actual Delivery Goods are physically delivered to the buyer or to a third person
who is authorised to hold goods on behalf of the buyer.
Example : Where a warehouseman holding the goods of A agrees to hold them on behalf of B,
at A’s request, it is Constructive Delivery.
Example : Delivery of goods in the course of transit may be made by handing over documents of
title to goods, like bill of lading or railway receipt or delivery orders or the key to a warehouse
containing the goods is handed over to the buyer . Such handing over of documents of title or
a key etc., are Symbolic deliveries.
Example : When ‘A’ contracts to sell timber and make bundles thereof, the goods will be in a
deliverable state after A has put the goods in such a condition.
● bill of lading,
There is difference between ‘Document showing title’ and ‘Document of Title’. A document showing
title merely shows that the person named in the document is its owner. It does not allow that
person to transfer the ownership by mere endorsement of the document. For example, a share
certificate is a ‘document’ showing title but not a document of title.
An agent who in the customary course of business has, as such agent, authority either to sell
goods or to consign goods for the purpose of sale or to buy goods or to raise money on the
security of the goods.
Example : If A who owns certain goods pledges them to B, A has general property in the goods,
whereas B has special property or interest in the goods to the extent of the amount of advance he
has made.
A person is said to be insolvent when he ceases to pay his debts in the ordinary course of
business, or cannot pay his debts as they become due, whether he has committed an act of
insolvency or not.
● Contract of sale resembles with contracts of hire purchase very closely, and indeed the real
object of a contract of hire purchase is the sale of the goods ultimately.
● Hire-Purchase agreement – means an agreement under which goods are let on hire and
under which the hirer has an option to purchase them in accordance with the terms of the
agreement and includes an agreement under which –
o The property in the goods is to pass to such person on the payment of the last of
such instalments, and
Termination of Buyer cannot terminate the The hirer may terminate the
contract contract and is bound to pay contract by returning the
the price of the goods. goods to its owner without any
liability to pay the remaining
instalments.
Burden of Risk of The seller takes the risk of The owner takes no such risk,
insolvency of the any loss resulting from the for if the hirer fails to pay an
buyer insolvency of the buyer. instalment, the owner has the
right to take back the goods.
Transfer of title The buyer can pass a good The hirer cannot pass any
title to a bona fide purchaser title even to a bona fide
from him purchaser.
Resale The buyer in sale can resell The hire purchaser cannot
the goods. resell unless he has paid all the
instalments.
o Such person has a right to terminate the agreement at any time before the property
so passes.
Basis of
Sale Bailment
difference
A contract of sale of goods is one in which some goods are sold or are to be sold for a price. But
where no goods are sold, and there is only the doing or rendering of some work of labour,
then the contract is only of work and labour and not of sale of goods.
Example : Where gold is supplied to a goldsmith for preparing an ornament or when an artist is
asked to paint a picture.
● A contract of sale is made by an offer to buy or sell goods for a price and the acceptance of such
offer [Section 5(1)].
▪ In writing or
▪ By word of mouth, or
● Ex: Ram agrees to deliver his old bike valued at Rs.50,000 to Sam in exchange for a new model of
Triumph and agrees to pay the difference in cash, it is a Contract of Sale – as there are two parties,
subject matter is goods, sold for price (part money and part kind), it’s a valid contract and goods are
agreed to be delivered.
Situation IV Situation V
Delivery and Delivery or payment
payment both in or both made at a
instalments future date
Where there is a contract for the sale of specific goods, if the goods without the knowledge of
the seller have, at the time when the contract was made, perished or become so damaged as no
longer to answer to their description contract - the contract is void.
Example : A agrees to sell B 50 bags of wheat stored in the A’s godown. Due to water logging, all the
goods stored in the godown were destroyed. At the time of agreement, neither parties were aware
of the fact. The agreement is void.
Where there is an agreement to sell specific goods, and subsequently the goods without any
fault on the part of the seller or buyer perish or become so damaged as no longer to answer to their
description in the agreement before the risk passes to the buyer - agreement is thereby
avoided or becomes void.
If the future goods are specific, the destruction of such goods will amount to supervening
impossibility and the contract shall become void.
Goods
Perishing
Amounts to
Contract can be Supervening
Contract is Void
avoided Impossibility, becomes
void
8. Ascertainment of Price
● Where the price is not determined in accordance with the foregoing provisions, the buyer
shall pay the seller a reasonable price.
Price is mutually agreed by the parties to the contract. But in some cases price is determined by
third person like experts and valuers.
● Agreement is avoided.
● If the goods or any part thereof have been delivered to, and appropriated by, the
buyer, he shall pay a reasonable price therefore.
ii) In case the third party is prevented by the default of either party from fixing the price -
the party not in fault may maintain a suit for damages against the party in default.
Example : P is having two bikes. He agrees to sell both of the bikes to S at a price to be fixed by
the Q. He gives delivery of one bike immediately. Q refuses to fix the price. As such P asks S to
return the bike already delivered while S claims for the delivery of the second bike too. In the
given instance, buyer S shall pay reasonable price to P for the bike already taken. As regards the
second bike, the contract can be avoided.
Contract of Sale
Transfer of
Agreement Subject matter Price
property
Immediately - Money
Two parties Goods
Sale consideration
Future date -
Seller Existing Agreement to Ascertainment of
Sell price
Buyer Specific
Agreement to sell
at valuation
May be Ascertained
absolute or
conditional
Unascertained
Future
Contingent
Learning Outcomes –
• Stipulation as to Time.
1. Introduction
At the time of selling the goods, a seller usually makes certain statements or representations
with a view to induce and influence the intending buyer to purchase the goods.
Such representations are generally about the nature and quality of goods, and about their eligibility to
suit buyer’s purpose or requirement.
When these statements or representations do not form a part of the contract of sale, they are not
relevant and have no legal effects on the contract.
But, when these form part of the contract of sale and the buyer relies upon them, they are relevant and
have legal effects on the contract of sale.
Stipulation - A representation which forms a part of the contract of sale and affects the
contract.
• As regard to time for the payment of price, unless a different intention appears from the terms of
contract, stipulation as regard this, is not deemed to be of the essence of a contract of sale.
All conditions given in the contract have to be abided by both, buyer and seller.
Stipulation as to Time
(1) A stipulation in a contract of sale with reference to goods which are the subject thereof may be a
Condition or a Warranty.
(2) A Condition is a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which
gives rise to a right to treat the contract as repudiate.
(3) A Warranty is a stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which
gives rise to a claim for damages but not to a right to reject the goods and treat the contract as
repudiated.
Condition Warranty
Example : Breach of Condition – Prakash wants to purchase a baking oven from Qadir, which should
have a capacity of 5 trays with 4 cakes per tray. Qadir, shows the drawing of the oven and says, “There
are 5 trays which can bake 4 cakes per tray.” Later Prakash buys the oven but finds out later on that the
oven had only 2 trays.
This amounts to a breach of condition because the seller made a stipulation which forms the essence of
the contract. In this case, the 5-tray capacity was a stipulation that was essential to the main purpose of
the contract and hence its breach is a breach of condition. Prakash is therefore entitled to reject the
oven and have a refund of the price.
Example : Breach of Warranty – Ram buys a new Maruti car from the showroom and the car is
guaranteed against any manufacturing defect under normal usage for a period of one year from the
date of original purchase and in the event of any manufacturing defect there will be replacement of
defective part if it cannot be properly repaired. After six months, Ram finds that the horn of the car is
not working.
Here, in this case Ram cannot terminate the contract. The manufacturer can either get it repaired or
replace it with a new horn. Ram gets a right to claim for damages, if any, suffered by him but not the
right of repudiation.
Basis of
Condition Warranty
differences
Meaning A condition is an essential A warranty is a collateral
stipulation to the main purpose stipulation, which is additional
of the contract. [Sec 12(2)] to the main purpose of the
contract. [Sec12(3)]
Right in case of The aggrieved party can The aggrieved party can claim
breach repudiate (cancel) the contract only damages.
or claim damages or both.
In the following cases, a contract is not avoided even on account of a breach of a condition –
Voluntary Compulsory
waiver waiver
[Sec. 13(1)] [Sec. 13(2)] Buyer accepts the
Buyer waives the goods or part
condition thereof in a non-
severable contract
Buyer elects to
treat the breach Any condition
of condition as a whose fulfillment
breach of is excused by law
warranty
Example : A agrees to supply B 10 bags of first quality sugar @ ₹ 625 per bag but supplies only second
quality sugar, the price of which is ₹ 600 per bag. There is a breach of condition and the buyer can reject
the goods. But if the buyer so elects, he may treat it as a breach of warranty, accept the second quality
sugar and claim damages @ ₹ 25 per bag. – Voluntary waiver.
Example : Mrs. Kumar agrees to buy one six seater dining table from Banta Furnitures looking at
brochure. Banta furniture delivers 6 chairs and six seater table as the chairs are attached to the table
and part of the model chosen. There is a breach of condition but the chairs are non-severable. If Mrs.
Kumar accepts it, the condition would be treated as warranty. – Compulsory waiver.
Agreed upon between the parties at the time of contract and are expressly provided in the
contract.
Those which are presumed by law to be present in the contract. Implied conditions are
incorporated by law in the contract of sale.
Following are the implied conditions in a contract of sale unless otherwise agreed in the contract –
Sale by
Sample as
well as Conditionas
Sale by
Description to quality or
Sample
fitness
Sale by Condition as to
Description merchantability
• In every contract of sale, the condition implied is that the seller has the right to sell the
goods at the time when the property is to pass. i.e.,
▪ In the case of an agreement to sell, he will have the right to sell the goods at the
time when the property is to pass.
• If Seller’s title is defective – Then, buyer must return the goods to the true owner and
recover the price from the seller.
Example : If A sells to B tins of condensed milk labelled ‘C.D.F. brand’, and this is proved to be an
infringement of N Company’s trademark, it will be a breach of implied condition that A had the
right to sell.
B in such a case will be entitled to reject the goods or take off the labels, and claim damages for
the reduced value. If the seller has no title and the buyer has to hand over the goods to the true
owner, he will be entitled to a refund of the price.
• If there is a contract of sale of goods by description, a default implied condition is that these
goods must correspond with this description.
• The buyer is not bound to accept and pay for the goods which are not in accordance with the
description of goods. The buyer is entitled to reject the goods whether the buyer is able
to inspect them or not.
Example : A ship was given as “copper-fastened vessel” in description but actually it was only
partly copper-fastened. It was held that goods did not match with the description and hence
could be returned or if the buyer took the goods, he could claim damages for breach.
i) Where the class or kind to which the goods belong has been specified, e.g.,
‘Egyptian cotton’, “java sugar”, etc., and
When the goods are to be supplied on the basis of a sample the following conditions are implied:
ii) The buyer shall have a reasonable opportunity of comparing the bulk with the
sample I,e. inspect the final goods.
iii) The goods shall be free from any latent defect i.e. a hidden defect.
Example : In a case of sale by sample of two parcels of wheat, the seller allowed the buyer an
inspection of the smaller parcel but not of the larger parcel. In this case, it was held that the
buyer was entitled to refuse to take the parcels of wheat.
Example : A company sold certain shoes made of special sole by sample for the French Army.
The shoes were found to contain paper not discoverable by ordinary inspection. Held, the
buyer was entitled to the refund of the price plus damages.
Where the goods are sold by sample as well as by description the implied condition is that the
bulk of the goods supplied shall correspond both with the sample and the description.
Example : A agreed with B to sell certain oil described as refined sunflower oil, warranted only
equal to sample. The goods tendered were equal to sample, but contained a mixture of hemp oil.
B can reject the goods.
• Ordinarily, there is no implied condition as to the quality or fitness of the goods sold for any
particular purpose.
• However, there is implied condition on the part of the seller that the goods supplied shall be
reasonably fit for the purpose for which the buyer wants them, provided the following
terms are fulfilled:
a) The buyer should have made known to the seller the particular purpose for which
goods are required.
b) The buyer should rely on the skill and judgement of the seller.
• Where the goods can be used for only one purpose, the buyer need not tell the seller the
purpose for which he requires the goods.
Example : ‘A’ bought a set of false teeth from ‘B’, a dentist. But the set was not fit for ‘A’s mouth.
‘A’ rejected the set of teeth and claimed the refund of price. It was held that ‘A’ was entitled to do
so as the only purpose for which he wanted the set of teeth was not fulfilled.
Example : ‘A’ went to ‘B’s shop and asked for a ‘Merrit’ sewing machine. ‘B’ gave ‘A’ the same and
‘A’ paid the price. ‘A’ relied on the trade name of the machine rather than on the skill and
judgement of the seller ‘B’. In this case, there is no implied condition as to fitness of the machine
for the buyer’s particular purpose.
Where goods are bought by description from a “Merchantable Quality” – goods of such
seller who deals in goods of that description a quality and in such a condition a man
(whether he is the manufacturer or producer or not), of ordinary prudence would accept
there is an implied condition that the goods shall be of them as goods of that description.
merchantable quality.
Essential
requirements
To be merchantable, a good for sale must be usable for the purpose it is made for. Goods should
be in such condition that an ordinary man would purchase and use
It must be of average worth (not necessarily special) in the marketplace and must not be broken,
unworkable, damaged, contaminated or flawed.
Example: A bought a black velvet cloth from C and found it to be damaged by white ants. Held,
the condition as to merchantability was broken.
In the case of eatables and provisions, there is another implied condition that the goods shall
be wholesome, in addition to the implied condition as to merchantability.
Example : A supplied F with milk. The milk contained typhoid germs. F’s wife consumed the milk
and was infected and died. Held, there was a breach of condition as to fitness and A was liable to
pay damages.
It is the stipulation which has not been included in the contract of sale in express words, but the
law presumes that the parties have incorporated it into their contract. Implied warranties are read
into every contract of sale unless they are expressly excluded by the express agreement of the
parties.
Implied warranties may also be excluded by the course of dealings between the parties
or by usage of trade [Section 62].
Warranty as Warranty as
Warranty as Disclosure of
to Non- to Quality or
to Dangerous
existence of Fitness by
Undisturbed nature of
Encumbrance usage of
Possession goods
s trade
If express agreement negates the implied warranties, express agreement will prevail.
• There is an implied warranty that the buyer shall have and enjoy quiet possession of the
goods.
• This means that, after receiving the title of ownership from the true owner the buyer should
not be disturbed either by the seller or any other person claiming superior title of the
goods. In such a case, the buyer is entitled to claim compensation and damages from the seller
as a breach of implied warranty.
Example : X buys a laptop from Y. After the purchase, X spends some money on its repair and
uses it for some time. Unknown to the parties, it turns out that the laptop was stolen and was
taken from X and delivered to its rightful owner.
Y shall be held responsible for a breach and X is entitled to damages of not only the price but also
the cost of repairs.
Example : A pledges his car with C for a loan of ₹15,000 and promises him to give its possession
the next day. A, then sells the car immediately to B, who purchased it on good faith, without
knowing the fact.
B may either ask A to clear the loan or himself may pay the money and then file a suit against A
for recovery of the money with interest.
In case the goods are inherently dangerous, or they are likely to be dangerous to the buyer
and the buyer is ignorant or unaware of the danger, an implied warranty on the part of the seller
emerges. The seller must warn the buyer duly about the dangerous nature of the goods if any. In
case of a breach of this warranty, the seller will be liable in damages.
Example : X purchases a bottle of disinfectant from a person Y. Y knows that the cap of the bottle
is defective or cheap and if opened by a novice without care, it may spill and result in partial
burning or other damages of the person. When X opens the bottle, he is injured.
In this case, X is liable in damages to Y as Y should have been duly warned of the probable danger.
6. Caveat Emptor
In case of sale of goods, the doctrine ‘Caveat Emptor’ means ‘let the buyer beware’.
“Subject to the provisions of this Act or of any other law for the time being in force, there is no
implied warranty or condition as to the quality or fitness for any particular purpose of goods
supplied under a contract of sale”.
• It is the duty of the buyer to satisfy himself before buying the goods that the goods will serve the
purpose for which they are being bought.
• If the goods turn out to be defective or do not serve his purpose or if he depends on his own skill or
judgment, the buyer cannot hold the seller responsible.
Example : A sold pigs to B. These pigs being infected, caused typhoid to other healthy pigs of the
buyer. It was held that the seller was not bound to disclose that the pigs were unhealthy. The rule of
the law being “Caveat Emptor”.
Example : A purchases a horse from B. A needed the horse for riding but he did not mention this
fact to B. The horse is not suitable for riding but is suitable only for being driven in the carriage.
Caveat emptor rule applies here and so A can neither reject the horse nor can claim compensation
from B.
• The doctrine of Caveat Emptor is, however, subject to the following exceptions –
Sale by Sample
Trade Usage
There is an implied condition that goods shall be reasonably fit for a particular purpose, if –
• The buyer had made known to the seller the purpose of his purchase, and
Example : An order was placed for some trucks to be used for heavy traffic in a hilly country. The
trucks supplied by the seller were unfit for this purpose and broke down. There is a breach of
condition as to fitness.
Goods which can be used for multiple purposes – Where the article can be used for only one
particular purpose, the buyer need not tell the seller the purpose for which he required the goods.
But where the article can be used for a number of purposes, the buyer should tell the seller the
purpose for which he requires the goods, if he wants to make the seller responsible.
Case Law: Bombay Burma Trading Corporation Ltd. vs. Aga Muhammad
Facts: Timber was purchased for the express purpose of using it as railways sleepers and it was
found to be unfit for the purpose.
Judgement: The Court held that the contract could be avoided.
6.2 Goods purchased under patent or brand name [Proviso to Section 16(1)]
In case where the goods are purchased under its patent name or brand name, there is no implied
condition that the goods shall be fit for any particular purpose.
Where the goods are sold by description there is an implied condition that the goods shall
correspond with the description. If it is not so then the seller is responsible.
• Where the goods are bought by description from a seller who deals in goods of that
description there is an implied condition that the goods shall be of merchantable quality.
The rule of Caveat Emptor is not applicable.
• But, where the buyer has examined the goods this rule shall apply if the defects were
such which ought to have not been revealed by ordinary examination.
Where the goods are bought by sample, this rule of Caveat Emptor does not apply if the bulk
does not correspond with the sample.
Where the goods are bought by sample as well as description, the rule of Caveat Emptor is not
applicable in case the goods do not correspond with both the sample and description or
either of the conditions.
An implied warranty or condition as to quality or fitness for a particular purpose may be annexed
by the usage of trade and if the seller deviates from that, this rule of Caveat Emptor is not
applicable.
Example : In readymade garment business, there is an implied condition by usage of trade that the
garments shall be reasonably fit on the buyer.
• Where the seller sells the goods by making some misrepresentation or fraud and the
buyer relies on it, or
• When the seller actively conceals some defect in the goods so that the same could not
be discovered by the buyer on a reasonable examination.
In such a case the buyer has a right to avoid the contract and claim damages.
Stipulation Doctrine of
as to Time Conditions Warranties Caveat
[Sec 11] Emptor
Learning Outcomes –
• Appropriation of goods.
1. Introduction
Passing of Delivery of
Passing of Risk
Property Goods
• The general rule is that risk prima facie passes with the property.
• If the goods are lost or damaged, the burden of loss is borne by the person who is the owner at the
time when the goods are lost or damaged.
• Where the goods are damaged by the act of the third party, it is the owner who can take action.
Suit for price by the seller can be filed only when the property has passed to the buyer.
Ownership and possession are two different aspects. Ownership gives Passing or transfer of
right in goods whereas possession gives right only to use goods in the property is the most
manner allowed by the owner. important element to
decide legal rights and
• Once the property has passed to the buyer, the risk in the goods sold liabilities of sellers and
is that of the buyer and not of the seller, though the goods may still be in buyers.
the seller’s possession.
o Identification of Goods [Section 18] – Where there is a contract for sale of unascertained goods,
the property in goods cannot pass to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained.
o Intentions of parties [Section 19] - The property in goods is transferred to the buyer at such
time as the parties to the contract intend it to be transferred. This can be ascertained based
on terms of contract, conduct of parties and circumstances.
2.1 Property (Specific or ascertained goods) passes when intended to pass [Section 19]
• Transfer of Property in case of a contract for sale of Specific or Ascertained Goods – The
property in them is transferred to the buyer at such time as the parties to the contract intend
it to be transferred
[Section 19(1)].
• Ascertaining the Intention of Parties – The intention of the parties shall be ascertained with
due regard to –
➔ Where there is an unconditional contract for the sale of specific goods in deliverable state,
➔ the property in goods passes to the buyer when the contract is made.
This rule holds true even if the time of payment of price, or the time for delivery of the goods, or
both, is postponed.
Example : X goes into a shop and buys a television and asks the shopkeeper for its home delivery.
The shopkeeper agrees to do it. The television immediately becomes the property of X.
Example : Peter buys a laptop from an electronics store and asks for a home delivery. The
shopkeeper agrees to it. However, the laptop does not have a Windows operating system
installed. The shopkeeper promises to install it and call Peter before making the delivery. In this
case, the property transfers to Peter only after the shopkeeper has installed the OS making the
laptop ready for delivery, and intimated the buyer about it.
2.1.3 Specific goods in a deliverable state, when the seller has to do anything thereto in order
to ascertain price [Section 22]
➔ Where there is a contract for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state,
➔ but the seller is bound to weigh, measure, test or do some other act or thing with
reference to the goods for the purpose of ascertaining the price,
➔ the property does not pass until such act or thing is done and the buyer has notice
thereof.
Example : Vikas purchases wallpaper from Sneh, however the price of the same will be
determined only after Sneh takes the measurement of the wall in order to ascertain the quantity
of wallpaper required to cover the wall. In this case, property will pass to Vikas only when Sneh
takes the measurements, ascertains the price and informs Vikas about the same.
• Where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained goods, property in the goods is not
transferred to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained [Section 18].
In case of contract of sale of unascertained/ future goods by description and such goods
are unconditionally appropriated [i.e., set aside] to the contract, either by seller with the
assent of the buyer or vice versa, the property in goods thereupon passes to the buyer.
Assent may be express or implied and may be given before or after the appropriation is
made.
Appropriation of goods involves selection of goods with the intention of using them in
performance of the contract and with the mutual consent of the seller and the buyer.
In Deliverable state
When, in pursuance of the contract, the seller delivers the goods to the buyer or to a
carrier or other bailee (whether named by the buyer or not) for the purpose of
transmission to the buyer, and does not reserve the right of disposal, he is deemed to
have unconditionally appropriated the goods to the contract.
Example : A bill of lading of a railway parcel is made out in the name of the buyer and is
sent to him, the ownership in the goods passes from the seller to the buyer. In case the
goods are subjected to accidental loss or by theft, the seller will not be liable.
Example : M places an order for a book with a book seller in Mumbai. He asks him to send
the book by courier. Payment of the book was to be made by cheque. The seller sends the
book by courier. The book is lost in the way. The seller wants the buyer to bear the loss.
According to Section 23 (2), it is an unconditional appropriation of goods because of which
buyer M has become the owner of the goods. Therefore, he will bear the risk of loss of the
book in the way.
A sale on approval, as applicable to the Sale of Goods Act, is a conditional sale of goods that is
made on a trial basis. A buyer who enters into a sale of approval agreement receives the goods
and has to deciding whether to buy within a given time period.
When goods are sent on 'Sale or Approval' basis property in them passes to the buyer when –
Example : P brought a musical instrument from a musical shop on a condition that he will
purchase it if he likes that instrument. After a week he has informed the shop owner that he
has agreed to purchase the musical instrument. The ownership is transferred when he has
decided to purchase the instrument as his own.
• If a time had been fixed for rejection – Such time has expired, or
• If no time had been fixed for rejection – A reasonable time has expired, or
Example : ‘A’ sends to ‘B’ a water motor on approval or return in March 2020. ‘B’ returns it
after trial in August 2020. The water motor has not been returned within a reasonable time,
and therefore, ‘A’ is not bound to accept it and ‘B’ must pay the price.
iii) Buyer does something to the good which is equivalent to accepting the goods or does
any act adopting the transaction.
Example : ‘A’ delivered some jewellery to ‘B’ on sale or return basis. ‘B’ pledged the jewellery
with ‘C’. It was held that the ownership of the jewellery had been transferred to ‘B’ as he had
adopted the transaction by pledging the jewellery with ‘C’. In this case, ‘A’ has no right against
‘C’. He can only recover the price of the jewellery from ‘B’.
When goods are delivered by a person on ‘Sale or return’ on the condition that the goods will
remain the property of the seller till they are paid –
• Property in such goods does not pass to the buyer until the condition is complied
with, i.e., cash is paid for.
Example : ‘A’ delivered his jewellery to ‘B’ on sale for cash only or return basis. It was expressly
provided in the contract that the jewellery shall remain ‘A’s property until the price is paid.
Before the payment of the price, ‘B’ pledged the jewellery with ‘C’. It was held that at the time
of pledge, the ownership was not transferred to ‘B’. Thus, the pledge was not valid, and ‘A’
could recover the jewellery from ‘C’.
• In certain cases, the seller may reserve the right of disposal of goods until certain conditions
are fulfilled, in such a case irrespective of delivery of goods to a buyer the property in goods
does not pass to the buyer until conditions imposed by seller are fulfilled.
Example : X sends furniture to a company by a truck and instructs the driver not to deliver the
furniture to the company until the payment is made by the company to him. The property
passes only when the payment is made.
i) If the goods are shipped or delivered to a railway administration for carriage and
by the bill of lading or railway receipt, the goods are deliverable to the order of the
seller or his agent, then the seller is prima facie deemed to reserve the right of disposal.
“Unless otherwise agreed, the goods remain at the seller’s risk until the property
therein is transferred to the buyer,
but when the property therein is transferred to the buyer, the goods are at the buyer’s
risk whether delivery has been made or not”.
• Thus, in ordinary circumstances, risk is borne by the buyer only when the property in the
goods passes over to him. However, the parties may, agree to the contrary.
For instance, the parties may agree that risk will pass sometime after or before the property
has passed from the seller to the buyer.
Example : ‘A’ bids for an antique painting at a sale by auction. After the bid, when the auctioneer
struck his hammer to signify acceptance of the bid, he hit the antique which gets damaged. The
loss will have to be borne by the seller, because the ownership of goods has not yet passed
from the seller to the buyer.
i) Where delivery of the goods has been delayed through the fault of either buyer or
seller, the goods are at the risk of the party in fault as regards any loss which might not
have occurred but for such fault [First Proviso to Section 26].
ii) The duties and liabilities of the seller or the buyer as bailee of goods for the other
party remain unaffected even when the risk has passed generally.
Example : ‘A’ contracted to sell 100 bales of cotton to ‘B’ to be delivered in February. ‘B’ took the
delivery of the part of the cotton but made a default in accepting the remaining bales.
Consequently the cotton becomes unfit for use. The loss will have to be borne by the buyer ‘B’.
“Subject to the provisions of this Act and of any other law for the time being in force, where goods
are sold by a person who is not the owner thereof and who does not sell them under the
authority or with the consent of the owner, the buyer acquires no better title to the goods than
the seller had, unless the owner of the goods is by his conduct precluded from denying the seller’s
authority to sell”.
• The general rule regarding the transfer of title is that the seller cannot transfer to the buyer
of goods a better title than he himself has. If the seller is not the owner of goods, then the
buyer also will not become the owner i.e. the title of the buyer shall be the same as that of the
seller.
• This rule is expressed in the Latin maxim ‘Nemo dat quod non habet’ which means ‘No one can
give what he has not got’.
Example : If A sells some stolen goods to B, who buys them in good faith, B will get no title to
that and the true owner has a right to get back his goods from B.
Example : P, the hirer of vehicle under a hire purchase agreement, sells them to Q. Q, though a
bona fide purchaser, does not acquire the ownership in the vehicle. At the most he acquires the
same right as that of the hirer.
4.2 Exceptions to the rule that Non-owner cannot convey a better Title to the Buyer
If this rule is strictly followed, then the innocent buyers may be put to loss in many cases. Therefore,
to protect the interests of innocent buyers, a number of exceptions have been provided to this rule
as follows –
The sale by a mercantile agent of the goods for document of title to goods would pass a good
title if –
Where any one of several joint owners has the possession of the goods with the permission
of the other co-owners, the property in goods is transferred to the buyer if –
• Has no notice, at the time of the contract of sale, of the fact that the seller has no
authority to sell.
Example : A, B, and C are three brothers and joint owners of a TV and VCR and with the consent
of B and C, the VCR was kept in possession of A. A sells the TV and VCR to P who buys it in good
faith and without notice that A had no authority to sell. P gets a good title to VCR and TV.
When a seller who has obtained goods under a voidable contract sells the goods; the buyer will
get a good title to the goods he has bought provided that the contract has not been
rescinded until the time of sale.
Example : X fraudulently obtains a diamond ring from Y. This contract is voidable at the option
of Y. But before the contract could be terminated, X sells the ring to Z, an innocent purchaser. Z
gets the good title and Y cannot recover the ring from Z even if the contract is subsequently set
aside.
4.2.4 Sale by one who has already sold the goods but continues in possession thereof [Section
30(1)]
When even after selling the goods the seller continues to be in possession of the goods/
documents of title to them, he may sell them to a third person, and if such person obtains the
delivery in good faith and without notice of previous sale, he will get a good title to the
goods.
A pledge or other disposition of the goods or documents of title by the seller in possession are
equally valid.
Example : During IPL matches, P buys a TV set from R. R agrees to deliver the same to P after
some days. Meanwhile R sells the same to S at a higher price, who buys in good faith and without
knowledge about the previous sale. S gets a good title.
4.2.5 Sale by buyer obtaining possession before the property in the goods has vested in him
[Section 30(2)]
Where the buyer obtains possession of the goods before property in them has passed to him, he
may sell, pledge, or dispose the goods to a third person, and if such person obtains delivery in
good faith and without notice of the lien or other right of the original seller, he will get a
good title to the goods.
A person in possession of goods under a ‘hire-purchase’ agreement which gives him only
an option to buy is not covered within this section unless it amounts to a sale.
Example : A took a car from B on this condition that A would pay a monthly instalment of ₹5,000
as hire charges with an option to purchase it by payment of ₹1,00,000 in 24 instalments. After the
payment of a few instalments, A sold the car to C. B can recover the car from C since A had neither
bought the car, nor had agreed to buy the car. He had only an option to buy the car.
Where the owner is estopped by the conduct from denying the seller’s authority to sell, the
transferee will get a good title as against the true owner.
Example : ‘A’ said to ‘B’, a buyer, in the presence of ‘C’ that he (A) is the owner of the horse. But
‘C’ remained silent though the horse belonged to him. ‘B’ bought the horse from ‘A’. Here the
buyer (B) will get a valid title to the horse even though the seller (A) had not title to the horse. In
this case, ‘C’, by his own conduct, is prevented from denying ‘A’s authority to sell the horse. Here,
‘C’s silence has induced ‘B’ to believe that ‘A’ is the owner of the horse.
Where an unpaid seller, who had exercised his right of lien or stoppage in transit resells
the goods, the buyer acquires a good title to the goods as against the original buyer.
• Sale by an Official Receiver or Liquidator of the Company will give the purchaser a valid
title.
• Purchase of goods from a finder of goods will get a valid title under circumstances [Section
169 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872]
• A sale by pawnee can convey a good title to the buyer [Section 176 of the Indian Contract
Act, 1872]
5.1 Delivery
• Delivery means voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another [Section 2(2)]
• If the possession is taken through unfair means, there is no delivery of the goods.
▪ Actual Delivery
▪ Symbolic delivery
▪ Constructive Delivery
Symbolic Constructive
Actual Delivery Delivery Delivery
• Duty of the Buyer – To accept the goods and pay for them.
• Delivery, acceptance, and payment should be in accordance with the terms of the Contract of
Sale.
• Unless otherwise agreed, delivery of the goods and payment of the price are concurrent
conditions.
o The seller shall be ready and willing to give possession of the goods to the buyer in
exchange for the price, and
The buyer shall be ready and willing to pay the price in exchange for possession of
the goods.
Goods in Delivery of
Time for Installment
possession Expenses Wrong
Tender of Deliveries -
of Third for Delivery Quantity -
Delivery Sec 38
Party Sec 37
• Which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any
person authorised to hold them on his behalf.
• If a part-delivery of the goods is made in progress of the delivery of the whole, then it
has the same effect for the purpose of passing the property in such goods as the delivery
of the whole.
• However, a part-delivery with an intention of severing it from the whole does not
operate as a delivery of the remainder.
Example : Certain goods lying at godown were sold in a lot. The seller instructed the godown
keeper to deliver them to the buyer who had paid for them and the buyer, thereafter,
accepted them and took away part. Held, there was delivery of the whole.
Apart from any express contract, the seller of goods is not bound to deliver them until the
buyer applies for delivery.
Depends on the
whether buyer to take possession of goods
contract, express
or seller to send them to the buyer
or implied
Place of Delivery
Goods not in
Delivered at place where
existence at
they are manufactured or
the time of
produced
agreement
Where under the contract of sale, the seller is bound to send the goods to the buyer, but no time
for sending them is fixed, the seller is bound to send them within a reasonable time.
Where the goods at the time of sale are in possession of a third person, there is no delivery
unless and until such third person acknowledges to the buyer that he holds the goods on
his behalf. However, this shall not affect the operation of the issue or transfer of any document
of title to goods.
The seller shall bear all expenses pertaining to putting the goods into a deliverable state unless
the parties agree to some other terms in the contract.
• Delivering lesser quantity – Where the seller delivers to the buyer a quantity of goods less
than he contracted to sell,
• Delivering larger quantity – Where the seller delivers to the buyer a quantity of goods larger
than he contracted to sell,
➔ the buyer may accept the goods included in the contract and reject the rest, or
➔ he may reject the whole.
If the buyer accepts the whole of the goods so delivered, he shall pay for them at the contract
rate.
• Delivers goods contracted mixed with goods of different description – Where the seller
delivers to the buyer, the goods he contracted to sell mixed with goods of a different
description not included in the contract,
➔ the buyer may accept the goods which are in accordance with the contract and
reject the rest, or
➔ may reject the whole.
The provisions of this section are subject to any usage of trade, special agreement, or course of
dealing between the parties.
Example : A agrees to sell 1000 quintals of wheat to B at ₹1,000 per quintal. A delivers 1,100
quintals. B may reject the whole lot, or accept only 1,000 quintals and reject the rest or accept
the whole lot and pay for them at the contract of sale.
Lesser quantity
- Accept goods and pay at contract price
Mix goods with - May accept goods as per contract and reject
different rest
description - Reject the whole
The buyer does not have to accept delivery in instalments unless he has agreed to do so in
the contract. If such an agreement exists, then the parties are required to determine the rights
and liabilities and payments themselves.
Subject to the terms of contract, the delivery of the goods to the carrier for transmission to
the buyer, is prima facie deemed to be delivery to the buyer.
Where goods are delivered at a distant place, the liability for deterioration necessarily
incidental to the course of transit will fall on the buyer, though the seller agrees to deliver at
his own risk.
Example : P sold to Q a certain quantity of iron rods which were to be sent by proper vessel. It
was rusted before it reached the buyer. The rust of the rod was so minimal and was not affecting
the merchantable quality and the deterioration was not necessarily incidental to its transmission.
It was held that Q was bound to accept the goods.
The buyer has the right to ascertain that the goods delivered to him are in conformity with
the contract. The seller is bound to honor the buyer’s request for a reasonable opportunity of
examining the goods unless the contrary is specified in the contract.
Where goods are delivered to the buyer and he refuses to accept them, having the right so to do,
he is not bound to return them to the seller, but it is sufficient if he intimates to the seller that
he refuses to accept them.
When the seller is ready and willing to deliver the goods and requests the buyer to take delivery,
and the buyer does not within a reasonable time after such request take delivery of the goods,
he is liable to the seller
• For any loss occasioned by his neglect or refusal to take delivery and
• Also for a reasonable charge for the care and custody of the goods.
The provisions of this section shall not affect the rights of the seller where the neglect or refusal
of the buyer to take delivery amounts to a repudiation of the contract.
Transfer of Ownership
Learning Outcomes –
• Unpaid Seller.
• Rights of Unpaid Seller.
• Effect of Sub-sale or Pledge by the Buyer.
• Right of Lien Vs. Right of Stoppage in Transit.
• Remedies of Buyer against the Seller.
• Sale by Auction.
• Inclusion of Taxes.
i) The whole of the price has not been paid or tendered and the seller had an immediate right of
action for the price.
Example : X sold certain goods to Y for ₹ 50,000. Y paid ₹ 40,000 but “Unpaid Seller”
fails to pay the balance. X is an unpaid seller.
➢ Part payment
ii) When a bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument has been
done
received as conditional payment, and the condition on which it was
➢ No payment
received has not been fulfilled by reason of the dishonour of the
done at all.
instrument or otherwise [Section 45(1)].
Example : P sold some goods to R for ₹ 60,000 and received a cheque for
the full price. On presentment, the cheque was dishonoured by the bank. P is an unpaid seller.
Negotiable instrument is an instrument issued by parties to fulfil their payment obligations. It serves
as an unconditional undertaking or promise that the person signing shall be under an obligation to
pay. It is transferable. The different types of negotiable instruments are Bills of exchange, Promissory
Note and Cheque.
The term ‘seller ‘ here includes any person who is in the position of a seller, such
as, an agent of the seller to whom the bill of lading has been endorsed, or a consignor
or agent who has himself paid, or is directly responsible for, the price [Section 45(2)].
An unpaid seller has been expressly given the rights against the goods as well as the buyer
personally.
The right of unpaid seller against goods can be categorized under two headings with respect to
property being passed to the Buyer –
• The unpaid seller of goods who is in possession of them is “Lien” – A right to keep
entitled to retain possession of them until payment or possession of property until
a debt owed is paid off.
tender of the price.
• The seller may exercise his right of lien even where he is in possession of the goods as
agent or bailee for the buyer.
• The unpaid seller’s lien is a possessory lien i.e., the lien can be exercised as long as the seller
remains in possession of the goods.
• Right of lien is exercised only to recover the unpaid amount of the Price, no other expense.
Example : A sold certain goods to B for a price ₹ 50,000 and allowed him to pay the price within one
month. B becomes insolvent during this period of credit. A, the unpaid seller, can exercise his right
of lien.
The term insolvent refers to “a person is said to be insolvent who has ceased to pay his debts in
the ordinary course of business, or cannot pay his debts as they become due, whether he has
committed an act of insolvency or not”.
Where an unpaid seller has made part delivery of the goods, he may exercise his right of lien
on the remainder, unless such part delivery has been made under such circumstances as to
show an agreement to waive the lien.
• The unpaid seller loses his right of lien under the following circumstances –
i) When he delivers the goods to a carrier or other bailee for the purpose of
transmission to the buyer without reserving the right of disposal of the goods.
ii) Where the buyer or his agent lawfully obtains possession of the goods.
• Once seller has parted with goods, right to lien cannot be exercised.
• Exception: The unpaid seller of the goods, having a lien thereon, does not lose his lien by
reason only that he has obtained a decree for the price of the goods.
Example : A, sold a car to B for ₹ 1,00,000 and delivered the same to the railways for the
purpose of transmission to the buyer. The railway receipt was taken in the name of B and
sent to B. Now A cannot exercise the right of lien.
“Subject to the provisions of this Act, when the buyer of goods becomes insolvent, the unpaid
seller who has parted with the possession of the goods has the right of stopping them in transit,
that is to say, he may resume possession of the goods as long as they are in the course of transit,
and may retain them until paid or tendered price of the goods”.
The goods are deemed to be in course of transit from the time when they are delivered to
a carrier or other bailee for the purpose of transmission to the buyer, until the buyer or his
agent in that behalf takes delivery of them from such carrier or other bailee.
• Goods rejected by the buyer when the carrier continues to be in possession – The transit
is not deemed to be at an end, even if the seller has refused to receive them back.
• Part delivery has been made to the buyer or his agent - The remainder of the goods may
be stopped in transit unless such part delivery has been given in such circumstances as to
show an agreement to give up possession of the whole of the goods.
The right of stoppage in transit is lost when transit comes to an end. Transit comes to an
end in the following cases –
Where part delivery has been made to the buyer, transit ends for the
remaining goods (in the course of transmission).
By taking Actual
Possession of the By giving Notice to
goods the carrier not to
deliver the goods.
• When giving a notice, to be effectual, it shall be given at such time and in such
circumstances, that the principal, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, may
communicate it to his servant or agent in time to prevent a delivery to the buyer.
• Where the notice of stoppage in transit is given by the seller to the carrier or other bailee in
possession of the goods, he shall re-deliver the goods to, or according to the directions
of, the seller. The expenses of such redelivery shall be borne by the seller.
• The main intention of stoppage in transit is to receive the payment due but not to recover
other expenses.
Right of stoppage in transit begins when the right of lien ends. Thus, the end of the right of lien
is the starting point of the right of stoppage in transit.
• The right of lien or stoppage in transit is not affected by the buyer selling or pledging the
goods unless the seller has assented to it.
Example : A sold certain goods to B of Mumbai and the goods are handed over to railways for
transmission to B. In the meantime, B sold these goods to C for consideration. B becomes
insolvent. A can still exercise his right of stoppage in transit.
Case Law: Mount D. F. Ltd. vs Jay & Jay (Provisions) Co. Ltd
Facts: A entered into a contract to sell cartons in possession of a wharfinger to B and agreed
with B that the price will be paid to A from the sale proceeds recovered from his customers.
Now B sold goods to C and C duly paid to B. But anyhow, B failed to make the payment to A.
A wanted to exercise his right of lien and ordered the wharfinger not to make delivery to C.
Judgement: The Court held that the seller had assented to the resale of the goods by the
buyer to the sub-buyers. As a result A’s right to lien is defeated.
• When a document of title to goods has been transferred to the buyer and the buyer
transfers the documents to a person who has bought goods in good faith and for a
consideration, then –
– The unpaid seller’s right of lien or stoppage be exercised subject to the rights
of the pledgee.
However, the pledgee may be required by the unpaid seller to use in the first instance, other
goods or securities of the pledger available to him to satisfy his claims.
• The contract of sale is not rescinded when the seller exercises his right of stoppage in transit.
• The contract still remains in force and the buyer can ask for delivery of goods on payment of
price.
The unpaid seller can exercise the right to re-sell the goods under the following conditions:
Seller gives
Right of resale
notice to the
is expressly
buyer of his
reserved in the
intention to re-
contract of sale
sell
Where the goods are of a perishable nature, the buyer need not be informed of the intention
of resale.
3.6.2 Where he gives notice to the buyer of his intention to re-sell the goods
If after the receipt of such notice the buyer fails within a reasonable time to pay or tender
the price, the seller may resell the goods.
• In such cases, on the resale of the goods, the seller is also entitled to:
a) Recover the difference between the contract price and resale price, from the original
buyer, as damages.
b) Retain the profit if the resale price is higher than the contract price.
• If the goods are resold by the seller without giving any notice to the buyer –
3.6.3 Where an unpaid seller who has exercised his right of lien or stoppage in transit resells
the goods
The subsequent buyer acquires the good title thereof as against the original buyer, despite
the fact that the notice of re-sale has not been given by the seller to the original buyer.
• In such cases, the seller is said to have reserved his right of resale, and he may resell the
goods on buyer’s default.
3.6.5 Where the property in goods has not passed to the buyer
The unpaid seller has in addition to his remedies a right of withholding delivery of the goods.
This right is similar to lien and is called “Quasi-lien”.
Under this, both ownership and possession are with the seller as the property has not passed to
the buyer.
• Rights of unpaid seller against the buyer are otherwise known as seller’s remedies for breach of
contract of sale. These are in addition to his right against the goods.
i) Property has passed to the buyer – Where under a contract of sale, the property in the goods
has passed to the buyer and the buyer wrongfully neglects or refuses to pay for the goods
according to the terms of the contract, the seller may sue him for the price of the goods.
ii) Price payable on a certain day irrespective of delivery – Where under a contract of sale, the
price is payable on a certain day irrespective of delivery and the buyer wrongfully neglects or
refuses to pay such price, the seller may sue him for the price although the property in the
goods has not passed and the goods have not been appropriated to the contract.
Where the buyer repudiates the contract before the date of delivery, the seller may treat the
contract as rescinded and sue for damages for the breach [Rule of Anticipatory Breach of
Contract].
• Where there is specific agreement between the seller and the buyer as to interest on the price
of the goods from the date on which payment becomes due, the seller may recover
interest from the buyer.
• However, in case there is no specific agreement to this effect, the seller may charge interest
on the price when it becomes due from such day as he may notify to the buyer.
• In the absence of a contract to the contrary, the court may award interest to the seller in
a suit by him at such rate as it thinks fit on the amount of the price from the date of tender of
goods or from the date on which the price was payable.
Example: Ramesh sells shoes to Suresh on 10th March and agrees to deliver on 12th of March
but fails to send the shoes even till 15th March.
Example: Ramesh sells shoes to Suresh, on 10th March and agrees to deliver on 12th of March
but later decides to sell it to Ravi and delivers the shoes to Ravi on 13th March.
• Delivers non-configuring goods and the buyer rejects and revokes the acceptance of such
goods
Example: Ramesh sells running shoes to Suresh, on 10th March and agrees to deliver on 12th
of March but later delivers normal canvas shoes on 13 th March which Suresh rejects to
accept.
Where the seller commits a breach of contract, the buyer gets the following rights against the seller
Where the seller wrongfully neglects or refuses to deliver the goods to the buyer, the buyer
may sue the seller for damages for non-delivery.
Example : ‘A’, a shoe manufacturer, agreed to sell 100 pairs of shoes to ‘B’ at the rate of ₹1,050/-
per pair. ‘A’ knew that ‘B’ wanted the shoes for the purpose of further reselling them to ‘C’ at the
rate of ₹1,100/- per pair. On the due date of delivery, ‘A’ failed to deliver the shoes to ‘B’. In
consequence, ‘B’ could not perform his contract with 'C’ for the supply of 100 pairs of shoes. In
this case, 'B’ can recover damages from ‘A’ at the rate of ₹ 50/- per pair (the difference between
the contract price and resale price).
[The damages could be recovered based on current market price in case the resale is not done.]
Where the seller commits of breach of the contract of sale, the buyer can appeal to the court
for specific performance. This remedy is allowed by the court subject to following conditions –
• The contract must be for the sale of specific and ascertained goods.
• The power of the court to order specific performance is subject to provisions of Specific
Relief Act of 1963.
Example : ‘A’ agreed to sell a rare painting of Mughal period to ‘B’. But on the due date of
delivery, ‘A’ refused to sell the same. In this case, ‘B’ may file a suit against ‘A’ for obtaining an
order from the Court to compel ‘A’ to perform the contract.
When there is breach of warranty by the seller, or when the buyer elects to treat breach of
condition as breach of warranty, the buyer is prevented from rejecting the goods only on
that basis.
i) Set up against the seller the breach of warranty in diminution or extinction of the price;
or
When either party to a contract of sale repudiates the contract before the date of delivery the
other party may either –
• Treat the contract as subsisting and wait till the date of delivery, or
• Treat the contract as rescinded and sue for damages for the breach.
The Act specifically states that nothing in this Act will affect the right of the seller or the buyer
to recover interest or special damages due to him by the contract.
In the absence of a contract to the contrary, the court may award interest at such rate as it
thinks fit on the amount of the price to the buyer in a suit for the refund of the price in a case
of a breach of the contract on the part of the seller from the date on which the payment was
made.
Example : In case of a sale of cigarettes which turned out to be mildewed and unfit for
consumption, damages were awarded on the basis of the difference between the contract price
and the price released.
Example : In case of absence of transfer of title or registration, the purchaser cannot claim
damages for breach of conditions and warranties relating to sale.
• ‘Auction Sale’ is a mode of selling property by inviting bids publicly and the property is sold to the
highest bidder.
People
Highest
gather and
Sale done bidder gets
bid
publicly the
different
property
prices
• The Auctioneer may also sell his own property as the principal and need not disclose the fact
that he is so selling.
Sale not • In that case it shall not be lawful for the seller to bid
notified to be himself/employ any person to bid at such sale, or
subject to a for the auctioneer knowingly to take any such bid.
right to bid by • A sale in contravention of this rule shall be treated
the seller as fraudulent by the buyer.
• This Section deals with the event where any tax is being imposed, increased, decreased, or remitted
in respect of any goods after the making of a contract of sale
• Unless a different intention appears from the terms of the contract, in the event of any tax is being
o imposed,
o increased,
o decreased, or
o remitted
in respect of any goods after the making of any contract for the sale without stipulation / terms
as to the payment of tax [i.e. where tax was not chargeable at the time of the making of the contract]-
(a) if such imposition or increase increases the amount due - the seller may add so much to the
contract price as will be equivalent to the amount paid or payable in respect of such tax or
increase of tax, and he shall be entitled to be paid and to sue for and recover such addition; and
(b) if such decrease or remission decreases the amount due - the buyer may deduct so much
from the contract price as will be equivalent to the decrease of tax or remitted tax, and he shall
not be liable to pay, or be sued for, or in respect of, such deduction.
• The buyer would have to pay the increased price where the tax increases and may derive the
benefit of reduction if taxes are curtailed.
• The effect of provision can, however, be excluded by an agreement to the contrary. It is open
to the parties to stipulate anything or agree on terms with regard to taxation.
Increased or Remedies of
Rights of an Auction Sale
decreased Buyer against
Unpaid Seller [Sec. 64]
taxes [Sec. 64A] the Seller
Learning Outcomes –
● Concept of Partnerships & its essentials
● ‘Principal – Agent’ relationship among partners
● Distinction with other forms of organization
● Kinds of Partnerships
● Types of Partners
1. Definitions [Section 4]
2. Elements of Partnership
2.2 Agreement
● The agreement from which relationship of partnership arises may be express. It may be oral or
in writing.
2.3 Business
o The term ‘business’ includes every trade, occupation and profession, and
Therefore, there can be no partnership where there is no intention to carry on the business
and to share the profit thereof.
Existence of
Business
Acquisition of Gains
● There can be no partnership where only one of the partners is entitled to the whole of the profits
of the business. Partners must agree to share the profits in any manner they choose.
o However, in the event of losses, unless agreed otherwise, these must be borne in the
profit-sharing ratio.
Example : Co-owners who share amongst themselves the rent derived from a piece of land are not
partners, because there does not exist any business.
Example : X and Y buy certain bales of cotton which they agree to ‘Partnership Agreement’ is
sell on their joint account and to share the profits equally. In also known as ‘Partnership
thesecircumstances, X and Y are partners in respect of such cotton Deed’.
business
Existence of a
business
Result of an Agreement to
agreement share profits
In determining whether a group of persons is or is not a firm, or whether a person is or not a partner in
a firm, regard shall be had to the real relation between the parties.
3.1 Agreement
Example : The members of a Hindu Undivided family carrying on a family business as such, or a
Burmese Buddhist husband and wife carrying on a business as such are not partners in such
business.
● The sharing of profits or of gross returns arising from property by persons holding a joint or
common interest in that property does not of itself make such person partners.
(d) by a previous owner or part owner of the business, as consideration for the sale of the
goodwill or share thereof,
does not of itself make the receiver a partner with the persons carrying on the business.
• To share the profit of a business and the business is being carried on by all or any of them acting
for all, if there is –
● According to Section 6, regard must be had to the real relation between the parties as shown
by all relevant facts taken together.
● Cumulative effect of all relevant facts such as written or verbal agreement, real intention and
conduct of the parties, other surrounding circumstances etc., are to be considered while
deciding the relationship between the parties and ascertaining the existence of
partnership.
3.3 Agency
● Each partner carrying on the business is the principal as well as an agent of other
partners. So, the act of one partner done on behalf of firm, binds all the partners.
● If the elements of mutual agency relationship exist between the parties constituting a group
formed with a view to earn profits by running a business, a partnership may be deemed
to exist.
In this case, the following factors weighed upon the Supreme Court to reach the conclusion that
there is no partnership between the parties:
➔ Parties have not retained any record of terms and conditions of partnership.
➔ Partnership business has maintained no accounts of its own, which would
be open to inspection by both parties.
➔ No account of the partnership was opened with any bank.
➔ No written intimation was conveyed to the Deputy Director of Procurement
with respect to the newly created partnership.
Winding up Can be dissolved at any time if all Either wound up by the NCLT or its
the partners agree. name is struck off by the ROC.
Interest in the Partner has interest in the property A member of club has no interest in
property of the firm. property of club.
Management All the partners are equally entitled The right of management of joint
to take part in the partnership family business generally vests in the
business. Karta.
Liability The liability of a partner is unlimited. Only the liability of Karta is unlimited,
and other coparceners are liable only
to extent of their share in profits of
family business.
Calling for A partner can bring a suit against On separation of the joint family, a
accounts on firm for accounts, provided he also member is not entitled to ask for the
closure seeks the dissolution of the firm. account of family business.
Minor’s capacity A minor cannot become a partner, A minor becomes a member of the
though he can be admitted to ancestral business by the incidence
benefits of partnership. of birth.
Continuity A firm gets dissolved by death or A Joint Hindu family has continuity till
insolvency of a partner. it is divided.
Share in the Each partner has a defined share by In a HUF, no coparceners have a
business agreement between the partners. definite share. The share fluctuate.
Co-Ownership or joint ownership is the relation which subsists between persons who own property
jointly or in common.
Formation Partnership always arises out of a Co-ownership may arise either from
contract, express or implied. agreement or by the operation of
law, such as by inheritance.
Implied agency A partner is the agent of the other A co-owner is not the agent of other
partners. co-owners.
Partnership Association
Partnership means and involves setting up Association evolves out of social cause where
relation of agency between two or more there is not necessarily a motive to earn and
persons who have entered into a business share profits. The intention is not to enter in a
for gains, with the intention to share profits business for gains.
of such a business.
5. Kinds of Partnerships
a) No fixed period has been agreed upon for the duration of the partnership, and
● Where a partnership entered into for a fixed term is continued after the expiry of such
term, it is to be treated as having become a partnership at will.
● A partnership at will may be dissolved by any partner by giving notice in writing to all the
other partners of his intention to dissolve the same.
● Where a person becomes a partner with another person in any particular adventure or
undertaking, the partnership is called ‘particular partnership’.
● Particular partnership is, subject to any agreement, dissolved by the completion of the
adventure or undertaking.
● The document in writing containing the various terms and conditions as to the
relationship of the partners to each other is called the ‘partnership deed’.
● Where the partnership comprises immovable property, the instrument of partnership must be
in writing, stamped and registered under the Registration Act.
Partnership deed should be drafted with care and be stamped according to the provisions
of the Stamp Act, 1899.
6. Types of Partners
Sleeping or Partner by
Nominal
Dormant holding out
Sub-partner Outgoing
● It is a person who has become a partner by agreement, and who actively participates in the
conduct of the partnership.
● In the event of his retirement, he must give a public notice in order to absolve himself of liabilities
for acts of other partners done after his retirement.
● It is a person who is a partner by agreement, and who does not actively take part in the
conduct of the partnership business.
● A person who lends his name to the firm, without having any real interest in it, is called a
nominal partner.
● He is, however, liable to third parties for all acts of the firm.
A partner who is entitled to share the profits only without being liable for the losses is known
as the partner for profits only and also liable to the third parties for all acts of the profits only.
● A person who is admitted as a partner into an already existing firm with the consent of all
the existing partners is called an “incoming partner”.
● Such a partner is not liable for any act of the firm done before his admission as a partner.
● A partner who leaves a firm in which the rest of the partners continue to carry on business is
called a retiring or outgoing partner.
● Such a partner remains liable to third parties for all acts of the firm until public notice is
given of his retirement.
● It is only the person to whom the representation has been made and who has acted
thereon that has right to enforce liability arising out of ‘holding out’.
Example : A partnership firm consisting of P, Q, R and S. S retires from the firm without giving
public notice and his name continues to be used on letterheads. Here, S is liable as a partner by
holding out to creditors who have lent on the faith of his being a partner.
• For fixing liability on a person who has, by representation, led another to act, it is not
necessary to show that he was actuated by a fraudulent intention.
7. Overview
Partnership
Learning Outcomes –
• Relations of Partners to one another and with Third Parties
• Implied Authority of a Partner
• Situations – Change in the constitution of a Firm and its effects
• Rights and Obligations of Transferee of a Partners’ Share
• To carry on the business of the firm to the greatest common advantage of the firm and its
partners.
• To observe utmost good faith in his dealings with the other partners.
• To render to any partner or his legal representatives full information of all things affecting
the firm.
Where some of the accounts are kept by one of the partners, prima facie he would be
the proper person to explain and give full information about them.
Example : In a transaction between partners for the sale and purchase of a share in the business,
if one of them is better acquainted with the accounts than the other, it is his duty to disclose all
material facts.
Every partner shall indemnify the firm for any loss caused to it by his fraud in the conduct of the
business of the firm. The amount so brought in the partnership should be divided between the
partners.
An act of a partner imputable (i.e., chargeable) to the firm or the principles of agency, which
is a fraud on his co-partners, entitles the co-partners as between themselves, to make the partner
responsible for consequences.
1.3 Determination of Rights and Duties of Partners by Contract between the Partners [Section
11]
• The rights and duties of the partners may be determined by contract between the partners,
whether express or implied.
• Agreements in restraint of trade – The contract of partnership may provide that a partner
shall not carry on any business other than that of the firm while he is a partner.
Every partner has the right to take part in the conduct of the
business
Every partner is bound to attend diligently to his duties in the
conduct of the business
Every partner has the right to express opinion on difference
arising as to ordinary matters
Every partner has the right to have access to and inspect the
books of the firm
In the event of death of any partners, legal representative or
heir or authorised agents shall have right to access and inspect
the books.
1.4.1 Right to take part in the conduct of the Business [Section 12(a)]
Every partner has the right to take part in the business of the firm, provided there is no contract
to the contrary between the partners.
Every partner whether active or sleeping is entitled to have access to any of the books of the
firm and to inspect and to copy any of the books thereof.
1.4.4 Right of legal heirs/ representatives/ their duly authorised agents [Section 12(e)]
In the event of the death of a partner, his heirs or legal representatives or their duly authorised
agents shall have a right of access to and to inspect and copy any of the books of the firm.
Right to
Right to receive Right to be
Remuneration Interest on Indemnified
Capital
Right to
Right to
Right to Share receive
Indemnify the
Profits Interest on
Firm
Advances
Partners are entitled to share in the profits earned and so also to contribute to the losses
sustained by the firm.
Where a partner makes an advance to the firm in addition to the amount of capital to be
contributed by him, he shall be entitled to claim interest thereon @ 6% per annum, unless
agreed otherwise.
Interest on capital account ceases to run on dissolution, whereas, the interest on advances keep
running even after dissolution and up to the date of payment.
b) Payment made in the performance of an act in an emergency for protecting the firm
from any loss, if the payments, liability, and act are such as a prudent man would make,
incur, or perform in his own case, under similar circumstances.
A partner must indemnify the firm for any loss caused to it by wilful neglect in the conduct of
the business of the firm.
2. Partnership Property
ii. All the property, rights and interest acquired or purchased by or for the firm, or for
the purposes and in the course of the business of the firm, and
Mere fact that property of a partner is being used for purposes of the firm shall not by
itself make it partnership property, unless it is intended to be treated as such.
o Any partner may upon the sale of the goodwill of a firm, make an agreement with the
buyer that such partner will not carry on any business similar to that of the firm within a
specified period or within specified local limits.
Subject to contract between partners, the property of the firm shall be held and used exclusively
for the purpose of the firm.
During the subsistence of the partnership, a particular partner does not have any proprietary
interest in the assets of the firm.
1) Where a partner derives any profit for himself from any transaction of the firm or from the use
of the property or business connection of the firm or firm name, he must account for that profit
and pay it to the firm. This rule, however, is subject to a contract between partners.
Example : A, B, C & D established partnership business for refining sugar. A, who was himself a
wholesale grocer, was entrusted with the work of selection and purchase of sugar. As a wholesale
grocer, A was well aware of the variations in the sugar market and had the suitable sense of propriety
as regards purchases of sugar. He had already in stock sugar purchased at a low price which he sold
to the firm when it needed some, without informing the partners that the sugar sold had belonged
to him. It was held that A was bound to account to the firm for the profit so made by him.
2) Where a partner carries on a competing business, he must account for and pay to the firm all
profits made by him in that business. This rule is also subject to a contract between the partners.
Example : A, B, C and D started a business in partnership for importing salt from foreign ports and
selling it at Chittagong. A struck certain transactions in salt on his own account, which were found to
be of the same nature as the business carried on by the partnership. It was held that A was liable to
account to the firm for profits of the business so made by him.
4. Rights and Duties of Partners after a Change in the Constitution of the Firm [Section 17]
• Where a firm constituted for a fixed term continues to carry on business after the expiry of
that term, the mutual rights and duties of the partners remain the same as they were before the
expiry.
• Where a firm constituted to carry out one or more adventures or undertakings carries out other
adventures or undertakings, the mutual rights and duties of the partners are the same as
those in respect of the original adventures or undertakings.
Subject to the provisions of the Act, a partner is the agent of the firm for the purpose of the
business of the firm.
The rule that a partner is the agent of the firm for the purpose of the business of the firm cannot
be applied to all transactions and dealings between the partners themselves. It is applicable only
to the act done by partners for the purpose of the business of the firm.
• Subject to the provisions of section 22, the act of a partner which is done to carry on, in the
usual way, business of the kind carried on by the firm, binds the firm. The authority of a
partner to bind the firm conferred by this section is called his “implied authority”.
• Section 22: In order to bind a firm, an act or instrument done or executed by a partner or other
person on behalf of the firm shall be done or executed in the firm name, or in any other
manner expressing or implying an intention to bind the firm
Example : X, a partner in a firm of solicitors, borrows money and executes a promissory note in
the name of firm without authority. The other partners are not liable on the note, as it is not part
of the ordinary business of a solicitor to draw, accept, or endorse negotiable instruments.
o Borrow money, contract debts and pay debts on account of the partnership,
• Under the following conditions, restrictions imposed on the implied authority of a partner by
agreement shall be effective against third party –
o The third party does not know that he is dealing with a partner in a firm.
• However, such extension or restriction is only possible with the consent of all the partners.
Any one partner, or even a majority of the partners, cannot restrict or extend the implied
authority.
In case of an emergency, a partner has authority to do all such acts for the purpose of protecting
the firm from loss as would be done by a person of ordinary prudence, in his own case, acting
under similar circumstances, and such acts bind the firm.
• An admission or representation made by a partner concerning the affairs of the firm is evidence
against the firm if it is made in the ordinary course of business.
• However, an admission or representation by a partner will not bind the firm if his authority on the
point is limited and the other party knows of the restriction.
Example : X and Y are partners in a firm dealing in spare parts of different brands of motorcycle
bikes. Z purchases a spare part for his Yamaha motorcycle after being told by X that the spare part
is suitable for his motorcycle. Y is ignorant about this transaction. The spare part proves to be
unsuitable for the motorcycle and it is damaged. X and Y both are responsible to Z for his loss.
• Notice to a partner who habitually acts in the business of the firm of any matter relating to the
affairs of the firm operates as notice to the firm.
• The only exception is in the case of a fraud on the firm committed by or with the consent of
that partner.
Example : P, Q, and R are partners in a business for the purchase and sale of second-hand goods. R
purchases a second-hand car on behalf of the firm from S. In the course of dealings with S, he comes
to know that the car is a stolen one and it actually belongs to X. P and Q are ignorant about it. All the
partners are liable to X, the real owner.
Example : A, a partner who actively participates in the management of the business of the firm,
bought for his firm, certain goods, while he knew of a particular defect in the goods. His knowledge
as regards the defect, ordinarily, would be construed as the knowledge of the firm, though the other
partners in fact were not aware of the defect. But because A had, in league with his seller, conspired
to conceal the defect from the other partners, the rule would be inoperative and the other partners
would be entitled to reject the goods, upon detection by them of the defect.
• Every partner is liable, jointly with all the other partners and also severally, for all acts of the
firm done while he is a partner.
• The expression ‘act of firm’ connotes any act or omission by all the partners or by any
partner or agent of the firm, which gives rise to a right enforceable by or against the firm.
To bring a case under Section 25, it is necessary that the act of the firm, in respect of which
liability is brought to be enforced against a party, must have been done while he was a
partner.
Example : Certain persons were found to have been partners in a firm when the acts
constituting an infringement of a trademark by the firm took place, it was held that they were
liable for damages arising out of the alleged infringement, it being immaterial that the damages
arose after the dissolution of the firm.
8.2 Liability of the Firm for Wrongful Acts of a Partner [Section 26]
The firm is liable to the same extent as the partner for any loss or injury caused to a third party
by the wrongful acts of a partner, if they are done by the partner while acting –
• Where-
a) a partner acting within his apparent authority receives money or property from a
third party and misapplies it, or
b) a firm in the course of its business receives money or property from a third party, and
the money or property is misapplied by any of the partners while it is in the custody of
the firm,
• If receipt of money by one partner is not within the scope of his apparent authority, his
receipt cannot be regarded as a receipt by the firm and the other partners will not be liable,
unless the money received comes into their possession or under their control.
Example : A, B, and C are partners of a place for car parking. P stands his car in the parking place,
but A sold out the car to a stranger. For this loss, the firm is liable for the acts of A.
A share in a partnership is transferable like any other property, but as the partnership relationship is
based on mutual confidence, the assignee of a partner’s interest by sale, mortgage or otherwise
cannot enjoy the same rights and privileges as the original partner.
On Dissolution of
• Entitled to receive the share of the assets of
the firm/
the firm, and
Retirement of
• for this purpose, to an account as from the
transferring
date of the dissolution.
partner
A minor cannot become a partner in a firm; however, he can be admitted to the benefits of
partnership under Section 30 of the Act, with the consent of all the partners for the time being.
i) A minor partner has a right to his agreed share of the profits and of the firm.
ii) He can have access to, inspect and copy the accounts of the firm.
iii) He can sue the partners for accounts or for payment of his share but only when severing
his connection with the firm, and not otherwise.
iv) On attaining majority he may within 6 months elect to become a partner or not to
become a partner.
• If he elects to become a partner, then he is entitled to the share to which he was entitled
as a minor.
• If he does not, then his share is not liable for any acts of the firm after the date of the
public notice served to that effect.
o Liability is confined only to the extent of his share in the profits and the property
of the firm.
o Minor has no personal liability for the debts of the firm incurred during his minority.
o Minor cannot be declared insolvent, but if the firm is declared insolvent his share in
the firm vests in the Official Receiver/Assignee.
Before attaining
No personal liability for debts of
majority
Liabilities of the minor
the firm
• Subject to a contract between partners and to the provisions regarding minors, no person
shall be introduced as a partner into a firm without the consent of all the existing
partners.
o The liabilities of the new partner ordinarily commence from the date when he is
admitted as a partner, unless he agrees to be liable for obligations incurred by the
firm prior to the date.
o The new firm, including the new partner who joins it, may
agree to assume liability for the existing debts of the
old firm, and creditors may agree to accept the new
firm as their debtor and discharge the old partners. The The technical term in a
contract for substituted
creditor’s consent is necessary in every case to make
liability is Novation.
the transaction operative.
[refer chapter 1]
o An agreement between the partners and the
incoming partner that he shall be liable for existing
debts will not ipso facto give creditors of the firm any
right against him.
This section does not apply to a partnership of two partners which is automatically dissolved by
the death of one of them.
• A partner is said to retire when he ceases to be a member of the firm without bringing to an
end the subsisting relations between the other members, or between the firm and third
parties.
Example: Mere retirement of a partner, who was the tenant of the premises in which the
partnership business was carried out, would not result in assignment of the tenancy rights in
The Supreme Court held that the expression ‘if any partner wants to dissociate from the partnership
business’, in a clause of the partnership deed which was being construed, comprehends a situation where
a partner wants to retire from the partnership. The expression clearly indicated that in the event of
retirement, the partnership business will not come to an end.
▪ A retiring partner continues to be liable to third party for acts of the firm after his
retirement until public notice of his retirement has been given either by himself or by
any other partner.
▪ But the retired partner will not be liable to any third party if the latter deals with the firm
without knowing that the former was partner.
▪ As regards the liability for acts of the firm done before his retirement, the retiring
partner remains liable for the same, unless there is an agreement made by him with
the third party concerned and the partners of the reconstituted firm. Such an
agreement may be implied by a course of dealings between the third party and the
reconstituted firm after he had knowledge of the retirement.
• If the partnership is at will, the partner by giving notice in writing to all the other
partners of his intention to retire will be deemed to be relieved as a partner without giving
a public notice to this effect.
The expulsion is not deemed to be in bona fide interest of the business of the firm, unless all
the following conditions are present –
The expulsion of partners does not necessarily result in dissolution of the firm. The invalid
expulsion of a partner does not put an end to the partnership even if the partnership is at will
and it will be deemed to continue as before.
Example : A, B and C are partners in a Partnership firm. They were carrying their business successfully
for the past several years. Spouses of A and B fought in ladies club on their personal issue and A’s
wife was hurt badly. A got angry on the incident and he convinced C to expel B from their partnership
firm. B was expelled from partnership without any notice from A and C. According to the test of good
faith as required u/s 33(1), expulsion of Partner B is not valid.
The provisions of Section 32(2), 32(3), 32(4) shall apply to an expelled partner as if he were a
retired partner.
• Ordinarily, but not invariably, the insolvency of a partner results in dissolution of a firm,
but the partners are competent to agree among themselves that the adjudication of a
partner as an insolvent will not give rise to dissolution of the firm.
• The estate of such partner (which thereupon vests in the official assignee) ceases to be
liable for any act of the firm done after the date of the order.
• The firm also is not liable for any act of such a partner after such date.
Ordinarily, the effect of the death of a partner is the dissolution of the partnership, but the
partners are competent to agree that the death of one will not have the effect of dissolving
the partnership as regards the surviving partners unless the firm consists of only two partners.
Where under a contract between the partners, the firm is not dissolved by the death of a partner,
the estate of a deceased partner is not liable for any act of the firm done after his death. It
is not necessary to give any notice either to the public or the persons having dealings with the
firm.
Example : X was a partner in a firm. The firm ordered goods in X’s lifetime; but the delivery of the
goods was made after X’s death. In such a case, X’s estate would not be liable for the debt; a
creditor can have only a personal decree against the surviving partners and a decree against the
partnership assets in the hands of those partners. A suit for goods sold and delivered would not
lie against the representatives of the deceased partner. This is because there was no debt due in
respect of the goods in X’s lifetime.
• An outgoing partner may carry on business competing with that of the firm and he may advertise
such business.
o solicit the custom of persons who were dealing with the firm before he ceased to be a partner.
• The partner may agree with his partners that on his ceasing to be so, he will not carry on a
business similar to that of the firm within a specified period or within specified local limits.
13. Right of Outgoing Partner in certain cases to Share Subsequent Profits [Section 37]
• Where any person ceases to be a partner because of his death or retirement, and the other partners
continue the business of the firm without final settlement of accounts, in such a situation the
outgoing partner or his representatives are entitled to either –
i) Share in the profits of the firm made since he ceased to be a partner as attributable to the use
of his share of property of the firm, or
ii) Interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the amount of his share in the property of the firm.
• Where, by a contract between the partners, an option is given to surviving or continuing partners
to purchase the interest of a deceased or outgoing partner, and that option is duly exercised,
the estate of the deceased partner/ outgoing partner/ his estate, is not entitled to any further
or other share of profits.
Example : A, B and C are partners. C retires after selling his share in the partnership firm. A and B
fail to pay the value of the share to C as agreed to. The value of the share of C on the date of his
retirement from the firm would be pure debt from the date on which he ceased to be a partner as
per the agreement entered between the parties. C is entitled to recover the same with interest.
Mere changes in the constitution of the firm, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary,
operates to revoke a continuing guarantee given to a firm or a to a third party as to all future
transactions.
Learning Outcomes –
• Mode of Registration of a Firm
• Effect of Registration
• Consequences of Non-Registration
• Circumstances when a firm is dissolved
• Consequences of Dissolution
1. Registration of Firms
The registration of a partnership is optional, and one partner cannot compel another partner to join
in the registration of the firm.
It is not essential that the firm should be registered from the very beginning. When the partners
decide to get the firm registered as per the provisions of Section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act,
1932, they have to file the statement in the prescribed form.
• The registration of a firm may be effected at any time by sending by post or delivering to
the Registrar of the area in which any place of business of the firm is situated or proposed to
be situated, a statement in the prescribed form and accompanied by the prescribed fee.
Other
Date on Full name
place(s)
Principal which and Duration
Firm's where
place of each address of the
name firm
business partner of each firm
carries on
joined partner
business
• The statement shall be signed by all the partners, or by their agents specially authorised in this
behalf. Each person signing the statement shall also verify it in the manner prescribed.
• Subsequent alterations in the name, place, constitution, etc., of the firm that may occur during
its continuance should also be registered.
“The statement under sub-section (1) [i.e., for the purpose of registration of firm] shall be sent
or delivered to the Registrar within a period of one year from the date of constitution of the
firm”.
In case of failure to send and deliver the statement within a time specified in sub-section (1A) of
Section 58, the firm may get registration on payment of ₹ 100/- per year of delay or part thereof
as penalty to the Registrar of Firms.
The Indian Partnership Act does not make the registration of firms compulsory nor does it impose any
penalty for non-registration. However, u/s 69 non-registration of partnership gives rise to a number
of disabilities which are as follows –
The firm or any other person on its behalf cannot bring an action against the third party for
breach of contract entered into by the firm, unless –
✓ The persons suing are or have been shown in the register of firms as partners in the
firm.
If an action is brought against the firm by a third party, then neither the firm nor the partner
can claim any set-off, if the suit be valued for more than ₹ 100 or pursue other proceedings to
enforce the rights arising from any contract.
2.3 Aggrieved partner cannot bring legal action against other partner or the firm
A partner of an unregistered firm (or any other person on his behalf) cannot bring any legal action
against the firm or any other partner.
Even if the firm is unregistered, a third party may bring an action against the firm.
No suit in a
civil court by a No relief to
firm or other partners for
co-partners set-off of
against third claim
party
Aggrieved
partner
Third party cannot bring
can sue the legal action
firm against other
partner or the
firm
✓ The power of an Official Assignees, Receiver of Court to release the property of the
insolvent partner and to bring an action.
✓ The right to sue or claim a set-off if the value of suit does not exceed ₹ 100 in value.
✓ The right to suit and proceeding instituted by legal representatives or heirs of the
deceased partner of a firm for accounts of the firm or to realise the property of the firm.
Example: A & Co. is registered as a partnership firm in 2017 with A, B and C partners. In 2018, A
dies. In 2019, B and C sue X in the name and on behalf of A & Co. without fresh registration. To
decide whether the suit is maintainable, the test applied was whether the plaintiff satisfied the only
two requirements of Section 69 (2) of the Act namely –
• the suit must be instituted by or on behalf of the firm which had been registered,
• the person suing had been shown as partner in the register of firms.
In view of this position of law, the suit is in the case by B and C against X in the name and on behalf
of A & Co. is maintainable.
Now, in this example, if in 2019 B and C had taken a new partner, D, and then filed a suit against X
without fresh registration, it will not be valid. The firm cannot sue as D’s (new partner’s) name has
not been entered in the register of firms.
3. Dissolution of Firm
The dissolution of partnership between all partners of a firm is called the ‘dissolution of the
firm’.
• Thus, the dissolution of firm means the discontinuation of the legal relation existing
between all the partners of the firm.
• But, when only one or more partners retires or becomes incapacitated from acting as a
partner due to death, insolvency or insanity, the partnership, i.e. the relationship between
such a partner and other is dissolved, but the rest may decide to continue. In such
cases, there is in practice, no dissolution of the firm.
Dissolution by Compulsory
Agreement Dissolution
Dissolution on Dissolution by
happening of notice of
certain partnership at
contingencies will
✓ by the adjudication of all the partners or of all the partners but one as insolvent,
or
Example: A firm is carrying on the business of trading a particular chemical and a law is
passed which bans on the trading of such a particular chemical. The business of the firm
becomes unlawful and so the firm will have to be compulsorily dissolved.
Where more than one separate adventure or undertaking is carried on by the firm – the illegality
of one or more shall not of itself cause the dissolution of the firm in respect of its lawful
adventures and undertakings.
Subject to contract between the partners, a firm can be dissolved on the happening of any
of the following contingencies –
• Where the firm is constituted for a fixed term, on the expiry of that term.
• Where the firm is constituted to carry out one or more adventures or undertaking,
then by completion thereof.
Where the partnership is at will, the firm may be dissolved by any partner giving notice in
writing to all the other partners of his intention to dissolve the firm.
Court may, at the suit of the partner, dissolve a firm on any of the following ground –
a) Insanity/unsound mind
b) Permanent incapacity
When a partner, other than the partner filing the suit, has become in any way permanently
incapable of performing his duties as partner, then the court may dissolve the firm. Such
permanent incapacity may result from physical disability or illness etc.
c) Misconduct
e) Transfer of interest
Where a partner, other than the partner filing the suit, has transferred whole of his interest
to a third party or has allowed his share to be charged or sold by the court for recovery
of arrears of land revenue due by him, the courts may dissolve the firm at the instance of
any other partner.
f) Continuous/Perpetual losses
Where the business of the firm cannot be carried on except at a loss in future also, the
court may order for its dissolution.
• Loss of substratum
Insanity
Just and
Permanent
equitable
Incapicity
ground
Grounds
for
dissolution
Continuous by Court Misconduct
loss
Persistent
Transfer of
breach of
Interest
agreement
4. Consequences of Dissolution
Consequent to the dissolution of a partnership firm, the partners have certain rights and liabilities,
as are discussed –
4.1 Liability for acts of partners done after dissolution [Section 45]
• Even after the dissolution of a firm, the partners continue to be liable as such to third parties
for any act done by any of them which would have been an act of the firm if done before the
dissolution, until public notice is given of the dissolution.
i) It seeks to protect third parties dealing with the firm who had no notice of prior
dissolution and
• Exceptions – Even where notice of dissolution has not been given, there will be no liability for
subsequent acts in the case of –
o An insolvent partner, or
o A dormant partner, i.e., a partner who was not known as a partner to the person dealing
with the firm.
On the dissolution of a firm every partner or his representative is entitled, as against all the
other partners or their representative –
• To have the property of the firm applied in payment of the debts and liabilities of the
firm, and
• To have the surplus distributed among the partners or their representatives according to
their rights.
After the dissolution of a firm the authority of each partner to bind the firm, and the other
mutual rights and obligations of the partners, continue so far as may be necessary
• to complete transactions begun but unfinished at the time of the dissolution, but not
otherwise.
However, the firm is in no case bound by the acts of a partner who has been adjudicated
insolvent.
Prima facie, accounts between the partners shall be settled in the manner prescribed by
partnership agreement. However, any such agreement cannot affect the rights of the creditors of
the firm.
In settling the accounts of a firm after dissolution, the following rules shall, subject to
agreement by the partners, be observed –
Example : X and Y were partners sharing profits and losses equally and X died. On taking
partnership accounts, it transpired that he contributed ₹ 6,60,000 to the capital of the firm and Y
only ₹40,000. The assets amounted to ₹ 2,00,000. In such situation, the deficiency (₹ 6,60,000 + ₹
40,000 – ₹ 2,00,000 i.e. ₹ 5,00,000) would have to be shared equally by Y and X’s estate.
However, if the agreement provided that on dissolution surplus assets would be divided between
the partners according to their respective interests in the capital, then the assets would be divided
between the partners in proportion to their capital with the result that X’s estate would be the main
loser.
Where there are joint debts due from the firm and also separate debts due from any partner, it shall
be settled in the following manner –
Partners' property
First First
Firm's Property
Registration of Dissolution of
the Firm the Firm
Liabilities to third
parties [Sec. 25-27]
Relations of Not allowed
Partners
Minor as Partner
Can be admitted to
the benefits of a
firm [Sec. 30]
Retirement [Sec.
32]
Legal
Consequenses of
Expulsion [Sec. 33]
Partner coming in
and going out
Learning Outcomes –
• Meaning and characteristics of Limited Liability Partnership
• Incorporation of LLP
• Partners and their relations
• Financial Disclosures
• Conversion into LLP
• Winding up and Dissolution of LLP
• Difference with other forms of organisations
1. Introduction
• The Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 is applicable to the whole of India.
First Schedule Mutual rights and duties of partners, as well limited liability
partnership and its partners where there is absence of a
formal agreement with respect to them.
Second Schedule Conversion of a firm into LLP.
Third Schedule Conversion of a private company into LLP.
Fourth Schedule Conversion of unlisted public company into LLP.
• The Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Registrar of Companies (ROC) are entrusted with the
task of administrating the LLP Act, 2008.
• The Central Government has the authority to frame the Rules with regard to the LLP Act, 2008,
and can amend them by notifications in the Official Gazette, from time to time.
In order to meet the contemporary growth of the Indian Economy, the lawmakers contemplated
the need for bringing out the new legislation for creation of LLP.
LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability company
and the flexibility of partnership. In order to enable professional expertise and entrepreneurial
initiative and combine, organize and operate in flexible, innovative and efficient manner, the LLP Act,
2008 was enacted.
LLP as a form of business organization is an alternative corporate business vehicle. LLPs allow for
a partnership structure where each partner’s liability is limited to the amount they put in the
business. Owing to flexibility in its structure and operation, LLP is a suitable vehicle for small
enterprises and for investment by venture capital. LLPs are common in professional business like
law firms, accounting firms, and wealth managers.
Section 2(n) of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 defines Limited Liability Partnership –
“Limited Liability Partnership means a partnership formed and registered under this Act”.
The LLP is a separate legal entity and, while the LLP itself will
Since LLP contains elements of both ‘a
be liable for the full extent of its assets, the liability of the corporate structure’ as well as ‘a
partners will be limited. partnership firm structure’ LLP is called
a hybrid between a company and a
partnership.
(i) Contribution of which does not exceed ₹ 25 lakh or such higher amount, not exceeding ₹ 5 crore,
as may be prescribed; and
(ii) Turnover of which as per Statement of Accounts and Solvency for immediately preceding financial
year, does not exceed ₹ 40 lakh or such higher amount, not exceeding ₹ 50 crore, as may be
prescribed; or
(iii) Which meets other requirements as may be prescribed, and fulfils such terms and conditions as
may be prescribed.
“Partner, in relation to a LLP, means any person who becomes a partner in the LLP in accordance
with the LLP agreement”.
b) he is an undischarged insolvent, or
If at any time the number of partners of a LLP is reduced below 2 and the LLP carries on
business for more than 6 months while the number is so reduced, the person, who is the
only partner of the LLP during such time and has the knowledge of the fact that it is carrying
Section 2(1)(e) of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 defines business-
“Business” includes every trade, profession, service and occupation except any activity
which the Central Government may, by notification, exclude.
Section 2(1)(j) of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 defines Designated Partner–
• Every LLP shall have at least 2 designated partners who are individuals and at least one of
them shall be a resident in India. [Section 7(1)]
• If in LLP, all the partners are bodies corporate or in which one or more partners are individuals
and bodies corporate, at least 2 individuals who are partners of such LLP or nominees of
such bodies corporate shall act as designated partners.
• Resident in India – A person who has stayed in India for a period of not less than 120 days during
the financial year.
Example: There is an LLP by the name Indian Helicopters LLP having 5 partners namely Mr. A
(Non-resident), Mr. B (Non-resident), Ms. C (resident), Ms. D (resident) and Ms. E (resident).
In this case, at least 2 should be named as Designated Partner out of which 1 should be resident.
Hence, if Mr. A and Mr. B are designated then it will not serve the purpose. One of the designated
partners should be there out of Ms. C, Ms. D and Ms. E.
• An individual shall not become a designated partner in any limited liability partnership unless he
has given his prior consent to act as such to the limited liability partnership in such form and
manner as may be prescribed.
• An individual eligible to be a designated partner shall satisfy such conditions and requirements
as may be prescribed.
• Every designated partner of a limited liability partnership shall obtain a Designated Partners
Identification Number (DPIN) from the Central Government and the provisions of sections 153
to 159 (both inclusive) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall apply mutatis mutandis for the said
purpose.
Section 3 of LLP Act provides that a LLP is a body corporate formed and incorporated under this
Act and is a legal entity separate from that of its partners.
Section 2(1)(d) of the LLP Act states that Body Corporate means –
“A company as defined in clause (20) of Section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 and includes –
i) a LLP registered under this Act,
ii) a LLP incorporated outside India, and
iii) a company incorporated outside India,
The LLP can continue its existence irrespective of changes in partners. Death, insanity,
retirement or insolvency of partners has no impact on the existence of LLP.
The LLP as a separate legal entity, is liable to the full extent of its assets but liability of the
partners is limited to their agreed contribution in the LLP. Creditors of LLP shall be the creditors
of LLP alone.
Partners act as agents of the LLP but not of the other partners. No partner is liable on
account of the independent or un-authorized actions of other partners. Thus, all
• Mutual rights and duties of the partners within a LLP are governed by an agreement
between the partners.
• In the absence of any such agreement, the mutual rights and duties shall be governed by
the provisions of the LLP Act, 2008.
Section 2(1)(o) of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 defines Limited Liability partnership agreement as
–
“Any written agreement between the partners of the LLP or between the LLP and its partners which determines
the mutual rights and duties of the partners and their rights and duties in relation to that LLP“.
• A LLP is an artificial legal person because it is created by a legal process and is clothed with
all rights of an individual.
• It can do everything which any natural person can do, except of course that, it cannot be sent
to jail, cannot take an oath, cannot marry or get divorce nor can it practice a learned
profession like CA or Medicine.
• A LLP is invisible, intangible, immortal (can be dissolved by law alone) but not fictitious
because it really exists.
• The LLP may have a common seal if it decides to have one [Section 14(c)]. Thus, it is not
mandatory for a LLP to have a common seal.
• It shall remain under the custody of some responsible official and it shall be affixed in the
presence of at least 2 designated partners of the LLP.
The essential requirement for forming LLP is carrying on a lawful business with a view to earn
profit. Thus, LLP cannot be formed for charitable or non-economic purpose.
2.4.12 Investigation
The Central Government shall have powers to investigate the affairs of an LLP by appointment
of competence authority for the purpose.
A firm, private company, or an unlisted public company are allowed to be converted into LLP
in accordance with the provisions of LLP Act, 2008.
Every form or application of document required to be filed or delivered under the act and rules
made thereunder, shall be filed in computer readable electronic form on its website
www.mca.gov.in and authenticated by a partner or designated partner of LLP by the use of
electronic or digital signature.
Compromise
Mutual LLP Investigation
or
Agency Agreement by CG
Arrangement
Organised Provides
All
and flexibility Flexible
partners
operates without Easy to Capital Easy to
enjoy
on the imposing legal form Structur dissolve
limited
basis of and procedural e
liability
agreement requirements
3. Incorporation of LLP
1. For a LLP to be incorporated two or more persons associated for carrying on a lawful
business with a view to earn profit shall subscribe their names to an incorporation
document. [Sub-section 1(a)]
2. It shall be filed in such manner and with such fees, as may be prescribed with the Registrar of
the State in which the registered office of the LLP is to be situated. [Sub-section 1(b)]
3. Statement to be filed –
Name and
Address of the
Address of the
Name of the registered
proposed
LLP office of the
designated
LLP
partners
Name and
Proposed Such other
Address of
business of the information as
proposed
LLP prescribed
partners
If a person makes a statement which he knows to be false or does not believe to be true, shall
be punishable with –
• Fine which shall not be less than ₹ 10,000 but which may extend to ₹ 5 lakhs.
• Where the Incorporation Document has been filed and complies with the requirements of
Section 11 the Registrar shall retain the incorporation document and, he shall, within a period
of 14 days –
b) Give a certificate, signed by the Registrar and authenticated by his seal, that the LLP is
incorporated by the name specified therein.
• The certificate shall be conclusive evidence that the LLP is incorporated by the name specified
therein.
1. Every LLP shall have a registered office to which all communications and notices may be
addressed and where they shall be received.
2. Serving documents on LLP or its partner or designated partner – A document may be served
on a LLP or a partner or designated partner thereof –
• at the registered office and any other address specifically declared by the LLP for the
purpose in such form and manner as may be prescribed.
3. Change of Registered Office – A LLP may change the place of its registered office and file the
notice of such change with the Registrar in such form and manner and subject to such
conditions as may be prescribed and any such change shall take effect only upon such filing.
4. Punishment for contravention – If the LLP contravenes any provisions of this section, the LLP
and its every partner shall be liable to a penalty of ₹ 500 per day during which the default
continues, subject to maximum of ₹ 50,000.
• Every LLP shall have either the words “Limited Liability Partnership” or the acronym “LLP”
as the last words of its name.
• No LLP shall be registered by a name which, in the opinion of the Central Government is—
✓ Undesirable, or
• A person may apply in such form (e-Form 1) and manner and accompanied by such fee as may
be prescribed to the Registrar for the reservation of a name set out in the application as –
• Upon receipt of an application and on payment of the prescribed fee, the Registrar may, if he
is satisfied that the name to be reserved is not one which may be rejected on any ground
referred to in section 15, reserve the name for a period of 3 months from the date of
intimation by the Registrar.
• If through inadvertence or otherwise, a LLP on its first registration or on its registration by a new
body corporate, is registered by a name–
the Central Government (CG) may direct such LLP to change its name.
• The LLP shall comply with such direction within 3 months from the date of issue of such
direction.
• An application of the proprietor of the registered trade mark shall be maintainable within a
period of 3 years from the date of incorporation or registration or change of name of the LLP
under this Act.
• Where LLP changes its name or obtains a new name, it shall within a period of 15 days from the
date of such change, give notice of the change to Registrar along with the order of the Central
Government, who shall carry out necessary changes in the certificate of incorporation and within
30 days of such change in the certificate of incorporation, such LLP shall change its name in
the LLP agreement.
• If the LLP defaults in complying with direction of the CG, the CG shall allot a new name to the
LLP in such manner as may be prescribed and Registrar shall enter the new name in the register
of LLP and issue a fresh Certificate of Incorporation.
• The LLP can subsequently change its name in accordance with the provisions of Section 16.
Name Reservation
Incorporate LLP
Applicant shall file e-
Form 1 for LLP Agreement
File e-Form 2 for
ascertaining the
incorporating a new
availability and To be filed with the
LLP, containg details of
reservation of the Registrar in e-Form 3
proposed LLP, partners
name of the LLP. within 30 days of
and designated
incorporation.
partners and their
consent Mandatory u/s 23.
• On the incorporation of a LLP, the persons who subscribed their names to the incorporation
document shall be its partners.
• Any other person may become a partner of the LLP by and in accordance with the LLP
agreement.
• The LLP agreement and any changes, if any, made therein shall be filed with the Registrar
in such form, manner and accompanied by such fees as may be prescribed.
• An agreement in writing made before the incorporation of a LLP between the persons who
subscribe their names to the incorporation document may impose obligations on the LLP.
However, such agreement should be ratified by all the partners after the incorporation
of the LLP.
• In the absence of agreement with the other partners as to cessation of being a partner, by
giving a notice in writing of not less than 30 days to the other partners of his intention to
resign as partner.
3. Where a person has ceased to be a partner of a LLP such partner (to be called ‘former partner’)
shall be regarded by a person dealing with the LLP as still being a partner of the LLP unless
–
✓ The person has notice that the former partner has ceased to be a partner of the LLP; or
✓ Notice that the former partner has ceased to be a partner of the LLP has been delivered
to the Registrar.
• The cessation of a partner from the LLP does not by itself discharge the partner from
any obligation to the LLP or to the other partners or to any other person which he
incurred while being a partner.
• The former partner or a person entitled to his share in consequence of the death or
insolvency of the former partner, shall be entitled to receive from the LLP –
✓ An amount equal to the capital contribution of the former partner actually made to
the LLP; and
✓ His right to share in the accumulated profits of the LLP, after the deduction of
accumulated losses, determined as at the date the former partner ceased to be
a partner.
o Shall be signed by the designated partner of the LLP and authenticated in a manner
as may be prescribed, and
Penalty
• Any person who ceases to be a partner of a LLP may himself file the notice with the
Registrar –
o If he has reasonable cause to believe that the LLP may not file the notice with
the Registrar and
o In case of any such notice filed by a partner, the Registrar shall obtain a
confirmation to this effect from the LLP unless the LLP has also filed such notice.
However, where no confirmation is given by the LLP within 15 days, the registrar
shall register the notice made by a person ceasing to be a partner under this
section.
Every partner of a LLP is, for the purpose of the business of the LLP, the agent of the LLP, but not
of other partners.
✓ An obligation of the LLP whether arising in contract or otherwise, shall be solely the
obligation of the LLP [Sub-section (3)].
✓ The liabilities of the LLP shall be met out of the property of the LLP. [Sub-section (4)]
• A partner is not personally liable, directly or indirectly for an obligation referred to in section
27(3) solely by reason of being a partner of the LLP.
• A partner shall be personally liable for his own wrongful act or omission, but a partner
shall not be personally liable for the wrongful act or omission of any other partner of the
LLP.
i) Any person,
• given credit to the LLP, whether the person representing himself or represented to be
a partner does or does not know that the representation has reached the person so
giving credit.
ii) However, where any credit is received by the LLP as a result of such representation, LLP
shall, without prejudice to the liability of person so representing himself or represented to be a
partner, be liable to extent of credit received by it or any financial benefit derived thereon.
iii) Where after a partner’s death the business is continued in the same LLP name, the continued
use of that name or of the deceased partner’s name as a part thereof shall not of itself
make his legal representative or his estate liable for any act of the LLP done after his
death.
• Where the LLP or any of its partners act with the intent to defraud creditors of the LLP or any
other person, or for any fraudulent purpose, the liability of the LLP and partners who acted
with intent to defraud creditors or for any fraudulent purpose shall be unlimited for all or any
of the debts or other liabilities of the LLP.
• However, in case any such act is carried out by a partner, the LLP is liable to the same extent
as the partner unless it is established by the LLP that such act was without the knowledge or
the authority of the LLP.
• Punishment –
1. Every person who was knowingly a party to the carrying on of the business in the
fraudulent manner or with the intention to defraud shall be punishable with
✓ Fine which shall not be less than ₹ 50,000 but which may extend to ₹ 5 lakhs.
2. Apart from the criminal proceedings which may arise, the LLP and any such partner or
designated partner or employee shall be liable to pay compensation to any person who
has suffered any loss or damage by reason of such conduct.
However, such LLP shall not be liable if any such partner or designated partner or employee
has acted fraudulently without knowledge of LLP.
1. Reduced Penalty –
The Court or Tribunal may reduce or waive any penalty leviable against any partner or
employee of a LLP, if it is satisfied that –
• When any information given by any partner or employee (whether or not during
investigation) leads to LLP or any partner or employee of such LLP being convicted
under this Act or any other Act.
No partner or employee of any LLP may be discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed or
in any other manner discriminated against the terms and conditions of his LLP or employment merely
because of his providing information or causing information to be provided.
6. Financial Disclosures
Audit of Accounts
To be audited in accordance with CG may, by notification in the Official Gazette, exempt
the prescribed rules. any class or classes of LLP
➔ Fine in case of non-compliance with provisions of Sec 34(1), 34(2) and 34(4) –
The Central Government may, in consultation with the National Financial Reporting Authority
constituted under section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013,—
as recommended by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India constituted under section 3 of the
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, for a class or classes of limited liability partnerships.
the period from the 1st day of April of a year to the 31st day of March of the following year.
Provided that in the case of a limited liability partnership incorporated after the 30th day of
September of a year, the financial year may end on the 31st day of March of the year next
following that year.
In keeping with the Income tax law, the financial year for LLP should be from 1st April to 31st
March each year.
Unlisted Public
Firm to LLP Private Company to LLP
Company to LLP
1. Certificate of Registration –
The Registrar, on satisfying that a firm, private company, or an unlisted public company, as the
case may be, has complied with the provisions of the various Schedules, provisions of this Act
and the rules made thereunder, register the documents and issue a certificate of
registration in such form as the Registrar may determine stating that the LLP is, on and from
the date specified in the certificate, registered under this Act.
The LLP shall, within 15 days of the date of registration, inform the concerned Registrar of
Firms or Registrar of Companies, as the case may be, with which it was registered under the
provisions of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 or the Companies Act, 2013 about the
conversion and of the particulars of the LLP in such form and manner as may be prescribed.
3. Effects of conversion –
• Upon such conversion, the partners of the firm, the shareholders of private company
or unlisted public company, as the case may be, the LLP to which such firm or such
company has converted, and the partners of the LLP shall be bound by the provisions
of the various Schedules, as the case may be, applicable to them.
4. Effect of Registration –
i) There shall be a LLP by the name specified in the certificate of registration registered
under this Act.
ii) All tangible and intangible property vested in the firm or the company, all assets,
interests, rights, privileges, liabilities, obligations relating to the firm or the company,
as the case may be, and the whole of the undertaking of the firm or the company, as
the case may be, shall be transferred to and shall vest in the LLP without further
assurance, act or deed.
iii) The firm or the company, as the case may be, shall be deemed to be dissolved and
removed from the records of the Registrar of Firms or Registrar of Companies, as the
case may be.
• The Central Government may make rules for the provisions in relation to winding up and
dissolution of LLP [Section 65].
10. Miscellaneous
A partner may lend money to and transact other business with the LLP and has the same rights
and obligations with respect to the loan or other transactions as a person who is not a
partner.
• The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, direct that any of the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013specified in the notification –
▪ shall apply to any LLP with such exception, modification and adaptation, as may be
specified, in the notification.
▪ If both Houses agree in disapproving the issue of the notification or both Houses
agree in making any modification in the notification, the notification shall not be
issued or, as the case may be, shall be issued only in such modified form as may
be agreed upon by both the Houses.
(1) Central Government may, for the purpose of providing speedy trial of offences under this Act, by
notification, establish or designate as many Special Courts as may be necessary for such area (s), as may
be specified in notification.
(a) single judge holding office as Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge, in case of offences
punishable under this Act with imprisonment of 3 years or more; and
(b) Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class, in the case of other
offences, who shall be appointed by Central Government with concurrence of Chief Justice of the
High Court:
➔ Provided that until Special Courts are designated or established under sub-section (1), the Courts
designated as Special Courts in terms of section 435 of Companies Act, 2013 shall be deemed to
be Special Courts for the purpose of trial of offences punishable under this Act
➔ Provided further that notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,
any offence committed under this Act, which is triable by a Special Court shall, until a Special Court is
established under this Act or the Companies Act, 2013, be tried by a Court of Sessions or the Court of
Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class, as the case may be, exercising
jurisdiction over the area.]
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, all offences specified
under section 67A(1) shall be triable only by the Special Court established or designated for the area in
which the registered office of the LLP is situated in relation to which the offence is committed or where
there are more than one Special Courts for such area, by such one of them as may be specified in this
behalf by the High Court concerned.
(2) While trying an offence under this Act, a Special Court may also try an offence other than an
offence under this Act with which the accused may, under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 be
charged at the same trial.
➔ Provided that in the case of any conviction in a summary trial, no sentence of imprisonment for a
term exceeding 1 year shall be passed
➔ Provided further that, when at commencement of or in course of a summary trial, it appears to the
Special Court that nature of the case is such that the sentence of imprisonment for a term exceeding
1 year may have to be passed or that it is, for any other reason, undesirable to try the case summarily,
the Special Court shall, after hearing the parties, record an order to that effect and thereafter recall
any witnesses who may have been examined and proceed to hear or re- hear the case in accordance
with the procedure for the regular trial.
The High Court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all powers conferred by Chapters XXIX and
XXX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on a High Court, as if a Special Court within the local limits
of the jurisdiction of the High Court were a Court of Sessions trying cases within the local limits of the
jurisdiction of the High Court.
• Any document required to be filed, recorded or registered under this Act may be filed,
recorded or registered in such manner and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed.
• A copy of or an extract from any document electronically filed with or submitted to the
Registrar which is supplied or issued by the Registrar and certified through affixing digital
signature to be a true copy of or extract from such document shall, in any proceedings, be
admissible in evidence as of equal validity with the original document.
• Any information supplied by the Registrar that is certified by the Registrar through
affixing digital signature to be a true extract from any document filed with or submitted
to the Registrar shall, in any proceedings, be admissible in evidence and be presumed,
unless evidence to the contrary is adduced, to be a true extract from such document.
(2) Central Government may appoint such Registrars, Additional Registrars, Joint Registrars, Deputy
Registrars and Assistant Registrars as it considers necessary, for the registration of LLPs and discharge
of various functions under this Act.
(4) Central Government may direct Registrar to prepare a seal or seals for the authentication of
documents required for, or connected with registration of LLP.
If any document or return required to be filed or registered under this Act with the Registrar is not filed
or registered in time provided therein –
✓ It may be filed or registered after that time on payment of such additional fee as may be
prescribed in addition to any fee as is payable for filing of such document or return,
✓ Such document or return shall be filed after due date of filing, without prejudice to any other action
or liability under this Act.
✓ A different fee or additional fee may be prescribed for different classes of LLP or for different
documents or returns required to be filed under this Act or rules made thereunder.
Regulating The Limited Liability Partnership The Indian Partnership Act, 1932.
Act Act, 2008.
Body It is a body corporate. It is not a body corporate
corporate
Separate legal It is a legal entity separate from It is a group of persons with no
entity its members. separate legal entity.
Creation By a legal process called By an agreement between the
registration under the LLP Act, partners.
2008.
Registration Registration is mandatory. Registration is voluntary.
Perpetual The death, insanity, retirement Death, insanity, retirement or
succession or insolvency of the partner(s) insolvency of the partner(s) may
does not affect existence of LLP. affect its existence. It has no
perpetual succession.
Name Name of the LLP to contain the No guidelines. The partners can
word limited liability partners have any name as per their
(LLP) as suffix. choice.
Liability Liability of each partner limited Liability of each partner is
to the extent to agreed unlimited. It can be extended up
contribution except in case of to the personal assets of the
willful fraud. partners.
12. Overview
Characteristics
Minimum 2 designated partners and
one should be resident in India
Name Reservation
LLP Agreement
Annual Return
Firm to LLP
Conversion into LLP
Company to LLP
Voluntary
Winding Up and
dissolution
By tribunal
Learning Outcomes –
• Company as a form of business organisation
• Corporate Veil Theory
• Classes of Companies
• Incorporation of Companies
• Classification of Capital and Shares
• Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association
• Doctrine of Ultra Vires and Indoor Management
1. Introduction
• The Companies Act, 2013 was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to the companies.
• The Companies Act, 2013 was preceded by the Companies Act, 1956.
• The Companies Act, 2013 contains 470 sections and 7 schedules. The entire Act has been divided
into 29 chapters.
• The Companies Act, 2013 aims to improve corporate governance, simplify regulations, strengthen
the interests of minority investors and for the first time legislates the role of whistle-blowers and
provisions relating to class action suit.
Insurance Companies
•Except where the Act is inconsistent with the provisions of the
Insurance Act, 1938 or the IRDA Act, 1999
Banking Companies
•Except where the Act is inconsistent with the provisions of the
Banking Regulation Act, 1949
Any other companies governed by any Special Act for the time
being in force
Such body corporate which are incorporated by any Act for time being in
force, and as the Central Government may by notification specify in this
behalf.
“Company means a company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law”.
Note: Above case law is not mentioned in ICAI study material. It is given here for better understanding.
• A company can own property, have bank account, raise loans, incur liabilities, and
enter into contracts.
• Even members can contract with company, acquire right against it, or incur liability to it.
• A member does not even have an insurable interest in the property of the company.
• Members may die or change, but the company goes on till it is wound up on the grounds
specified by the Act. The shareholders keep changing but that does not affect the existence
of the company.
• The existence of a company is not affected by the death or insolvency of its members.
Example : Many companies in India are in existence for over 100 years. This is possible only due
to the fact that the company has perpetual existence.
The liability of a member depends upon the kind of company of which he is a member.
• In case of a limited liability company – The liability of the members of the company is
limited to the extent of the nominal value of shares held by them.
• Further, a company is a separate legal entity. It can do everything which any natural
person can do except be sent to jail, take an oath, marry, or practice a learned profession.
• As the company is an artificial person, it can act only through some human agency, (i.e.)
directors. The directors can act as a company’s agency but are not the agents of the
members of the company. They can either on their own or through a common seal
authenticate the formal acts of the company.
• Common seal is the official signature of a company, which is affixed by the officers and
employees of the company on its every document.
• The common seal is a seal used by a corporation as the symbol of its incorporation.
• However, the Companies Amendment Act, 2015 has made the common seal optional.
• In case a company does not have a common seal, the authorization shall be made by two
directors or by a director and the Company Secretary, wherever the company has appointed
a Company Secretary
Perpetual Succession
• Not affected by the death or insolvency of its members
Limited Liability
• Liability of Company is different from that of its members
Common Seal
• Official signature of a company affixed on every document
(optional)
‘Corporate Veil’ is a legal concept which separates the identity of the company from its members.
Members of a company are shielded from liability connected to the company’s actions. If the
company incurs any debts or contravenes any laws, the corporate veil concept implies that
members should not be liable for those errors. Thus, the shareholders are protected from the
acts of the company.
Salomon Vs. Salomon and Co Ltd. laid down the foundation of the concept of corporate veil or
independent corporate personality.
Lifting the Veil means looking behind the company as a legal person, i.e., disregarding the
corporate entity and paying regard, instead, to the realities behind the legal facade.
Where the Courts ignore the company and concern themselves directly with the members or
managers, the corporate veil may be said to have been lifted.
The following are the cases where company law disregards the principle of corporate
personality or the principle that the company is a legal entity distinct and separate from its
shareholders or members –
A company does not have mind or conscience; therefore it cannot be a friend or a foe. It may be
characterized as an enemy company if its affairs are under control of people of an enemy
country. For this purpose, the court may determine the character of persons who are in charge
of the affairs of the company.
Case Law: Daimler Co. Ltd. vs. Continental Tyre & Rubber Co.
Facts: A company was formed in England (Continental Tyre & Rubber Co.) for the purpose of selling tyres made by a
German Company. The German Company held the entire share capital of the English Company and majority directors
of the company were German residents. During the First World War, the English Company commenced an action to
recover trade debt from other English Company (Daimler Co. Ltd.). To which the other company refused to pay the
amount.
Judgement: It was held that the corporate personality of the company be ignored and persons in ultimate control of
the company shall be considered and in this situation the persons controlling the company i.e., Continental Tyre &
Rubber Co. were enemies and hence the amount is not payable.
Where corporate entity is used to evade or circumvent tax, the Court can disregard the
corporate entity.
Case Law: Workmen of Associated Rubber Industry ltd., v. Associated Rubber Industry Ltd.
Facts: ‘A Limited’ purchased shares of ‘B Limited by investing a sum of ₹4,50,000. The dividend in respect of these
shares was shown in the profit and loss account of the company, year after year. It was considered for the purpose
of calculating the bonus payable to workmen of the company. Sometime in 1968, the company transferred the
shares of ‘B Limited’, to ‘C Limited’ a subsidiary, wholly owned by it. Thus, the dividend income did not find place in
the Profit & Loss Account of ‘A Limited’, with the result that the surplus available for the purpose for payment of
bonus to the workmen got reduced.
Judgement: It was found that the sole purpose for the formation of the company was to use it as a device to reduce
the amount to be paid by way of bonus to workmen. Thus, the Supreme Court brushed aside the separate existence
of the subsidiary company.
The legal personality of a company may also be disregarded in the interest of justice where the
company has been incorporated for some fraudulent purpose like defrauding creditors or
defeating or circumventing law.
Lifting of
For trading Corporate For
with the Veil - where fraudulent
enemy company is purpose
formed
When the liability of the members of a company is limited by its memorandum of association to
the amount (if any) unpaid on the shares held by them, it is known as a company limited by
shares [Section 2(22)].
Thus, for meeting the debts of the company, the shareholder may be called upon to contribute
only to the extent of the amount, which remains unpaid on his shareholdings. His separate
personal property cannot be used to meet the company’s debt.
• The right of a guarantee company to refuse to accept the transfer by a member of his
interest in the company is on a different footing than that of a company limited by
shares. The membership of a guarantee company may carry privileges much different from
those of ordinary shareholders [Narendra Kumar Agarwal vs. Saroj Maloo (SC)].
• A company not having any limit on the liability of its members [Section 2(92)].
• The liability of each member extends to the whole amount of the company’s debts and
liabilities, but he will be entitled to claim contribution from other members.
• In case the company has share capital, as long as the company is a going concern the
liability on the shares is the only liability which can be enforced by the company.
Member can be called upon to contribute only in the event of winding up of the Company.
• OPC is a private limited company with the minimum paid up share capital as may be
prescribed*and has at least one member
[Section 3(1)(c)].
* No limit prescribed
OPC differs from sole proprietary concern in an aspect that OPC is a separate legal entity with a limited liability of
the member, whereas in the case of sole proprietary, the liability of owner is not restricted, and it extends to the
owner’s entire assets both official and personal.
ii) Except in case of one person company, limits the number of its members to 200.
iii) Prohibits any invitation to the public to subscribe for any securities of the
company.
• Where two or more persons hold one or more shares in a company jointly, they shall, for
the purposes of this clause, be treated as a single member.
No Maximum
Prohibition OPC can be
minimum number of
on invitation formed only
paid-up Members -
to subscribe as a Private
capital 200 (except
to securities Company
requirement OPC)
ii) Turnover as per the profit and loss account for the immediately preceding financial
year does not exceed ₹ 20 crores.
Exceptions –
Paid up share capital and turnover limits for small company may be increased to such
higher amount as may be prescribed, but which shall not be more than ₹10 crore and
₹100 crore, respectively.
No minimum
Maximum No.
Not a Private paid up
of Members -
Company capital
No limit
prescribed
Subsidiary of
a public
Shares are Minimum No.
company -
freely of Members -
Deemed
transferable 7
Public
Company
ii) exercises or controls more than one-half of the total voting power either at its own
or together with one or more of its subsidiary companies [Section 2(87)].
b) The composition of a company’s Board of Directors shall be deemed to be controlled by another company
if that other company by exercise of some power can appoint or remove all or a majority of the directors.
Example : B Ltd. controls the composition of the Board of Directors of A Ltd. Thus, A Ltd. will be a
subsidiary of B Ltd.
Example : B Ltd. holds more than 50% of the share capital of A Ltd. A Ltd. will be subsidiary of B Ltd.
Example : B Ltd. is a subsidiary of A Ltd. and C Ltd. is a subsidiary of B Ltd. In such a case, C will be the
subsidiary of A.
The shares held by a company in another company in a ‘fiduciary capacity’ shall not be counted
for the purpose of determining the relationship of ‘associate company’ under section 2(6) of the
Companies Act, 2013.
Total Share Capital = Paid-up Share Capital + Convertible Preference Share Capital
Example : A Ltd. is a Public Company and holds 23% of share capital in B Ltd. and 15% share
capital of C Ltd. By virtue of the shareholding pattern –
✓ B Ltd. will be known as the Associate Company of A Ltd. (as the holding is more than 20%)
, whereas
✓ C Ltd. will not be Associate as the required 20% holding is not there and hence no
significant influence.
Listed company is a company which has any of its securities listed on any recognised stock
exchange.
Provided that such class of companies, which have listed or intend to list such class of securities,
as may be prescribed in consultation with the Securities and Exchange Board, shall not be
considered as listed companies.
Example : Tata Motors Limited is a Public Limited Company whose shares are listed in the Stock
Exchange – NSE and BSE. Hence, Tata Motors Limited is a Listed Company.
• Where these conditions specified above are satisfied, the Central Government may
register such person or association of persons as a company with limited liability
without the addition of words ‘Limited’ or ‘Private limited’ to its name, by issuing
licence on such conditions as it deems fit.
• Upon registration the company shall enjoy same privileges and obligations as of a limited
company.
• Before such revocation, the Central Government must give it a written notice of its
intention to revoke the licence and opportunity to be heard in the matter.
• Upon revocation the ROC shall put ‘Limited’ or ‘Private Limited’ against the
company’s name in the register.
• Where a licence is revoked there the Central Government may, in the public interest
order –
• The following companies may make an application to the ROC for obtaining the status of
a dormant company –
i) Inactive company,
✓ A future project or
o has not made any significant accounting transaction during the last 2 financial
years, or
ii) Payments made by it to fulfil the requirements of this Act or any other law,
• The Life Insurance Corporation of India, established under the Life Insurance
Corporation Act, 1956,
• Specified company referred to in the Unit Trust of India (Transfer of Undertaking and
Repeal) Act, 2002,
Established or
At least 51% of the
constituted by or
paid-up share
under any Central
capital is held by -
or State Act
Partly by the CG
By any State
and partly by one
The CG, or Government(s),
or more State
or
governments
a) who has been named as such in a prospectus or is identified by the company in the
annual return referred to in section 92; or
b) who has control over the affairs of the company, directly or indirectly whether as a
shareholder, director or otherwise; or
• They conceive the idea of forming the company and take all necessary steps for its
registration.
• However, persons acting in a professional capacity such as, the solicitor, banker,
accountant etc. are not regarded as promoters.
by subscribing their names to Memorandum of Association and complying with the requirements
of this Act in respect of registration.
Public Private
OPC
Company Company
7 or more 2 or more
1 person
persons persons
Filing of
Issue of
documents and
Certificate of Allotment of CIN
information with
Incorporation
the ROC
Effect of Maintenance of
Order of the furnishing false or copies of all
Tribunal incorrect documents and
information information
The following documents and information shall be filed with the registrar within whose
jurisdiction the registered office of the company is proposed to be situated –
MOA and AOA The Memorandum of Association (MOA) and the Articles of
Association (AOA) signed by all the subscribers.
Declaration • By a person engaged in the formation of the company
(like advocate, CA, CS etc.) and a person named in the
AOA (director, manager etc).
• Declaration that all the requirements of this Act and
the Rules in respect of Registration have been
complied with.
Declaration from • He is not convicted of any offence in connection with
each of the the promotion, formation, or management of any
Subscribers and company,
First Directors
The Registrar shall, on the basis of documents and information filed, register all the documents
and information in the register and issue a certificate of incorporation in the prescribed
form to the effect that the proposed company is incorporated under this Act.
• On and from the date mentioned in the certificate of incorporation, the Registrar shall
allot to the company a corporate identity number (CIN).
• CIN shall be a distinct identity for the company and shall also be included in the certificate.
5.3.5 Furnishing of false or incorrect information or suppression of material fact at the time of
incorporation
If any person furnishes any false or incorrect particulars, or suppress any material information,
of which he is aware, in any of the documents filed with the ROC in relation to registration of a
company, he shall be liable for fraud u/s 447.
Where, at any time after the incorporation of a company, it is proved that the company has
been got incorporated by
the promoters, the persons named as the first directors of the company and the persons
making declaration under this section shall each be liable for action for fraud u/s 447.
Where a company has been got incorporated by furnishing false or incorrect information or
representation or by suppressing any material fact or information in any of the documents or
declaration filed or by any fraudulent action, the Tribunal may, on an application made to it,
on being satisfied that the situation so warrants,—
a) Pass such orders, as it may think fit, for regulation of the management of the
company including changes, if any, in its memorandum and articles, in public interest or
in the interest of the company and its members and creditors; or
c) Direct removal of the name of the company from the register of companies; or
• The company shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in the matter;
and
• The tribunal shall take into consideration the transactions entered into by the
company, including the obligations, if any, contracted or payment of any liability.
In a step towards easy setting up of business, MCA has simplified the process of filing of forms for incorporation
of a company through Simplified Proforma for incorporating company electronically. Now, SPICe+ form has also
been launched that further eases the registration process.
✓ The subscribers to the memorandum and all other persons, who may from time to time
become members of the company, shall be a body corporate by the name contained in
the memorandum,
✓ Capable of exercising all the functions of an incorporated company under this Act, and
✓ With power to acquire, hold and dispose of property, both movable and immovable,
tangible, and intangible, to contract and to sue and be sued, by the said name.
State Trading Corporation A company on registration acquires a separate existence and the
of India vs. Commercial law recognises it as a legal person separate and distinct from its
Tax Officer members.
Spencer & Co. Ltd. Madras Merely because a company purchases all shares of another
vs. company it will not serve as a means of putting an end to the
CWT Madras corporate character of another company and each company is a
separate juristic entity.
Heavy Electrical Union The mere fact that the entire share capital has been contributed by
vs. the Central Government and all its shares are held by the President
State of Bihar of India and other officers of the Central Government does not
make any difference in the position of registered company and it
does not make a company an agent either of the President or the
Central Government.
• Memorandum and articles when registered, shall bind the company and the members thereof
to the same extent as if they respectively had been signed by the company and by each member,
and an agreement to observe all the provisions of the memorandum and of the articles.
• All monies payable by any member to the company under the memorandum or articles shall
be a debt due from him to the company.
• In relation to a company limited by shares, the word capital means share-capital, i.e., the capital
or figure in terms of so many rupees divided into shares of fixed amount.
• The proportion of the capital to which each member is entitled, is his share.
• A share is not a sum of money; it is rather an interest in the company measured by a sum of
money and made up of various rights contained in the contract.
• Thus, it is the maximum amount which the company is authorised to raise by issuing shares,
and upon which it pays the stamp duty.
‘Subscribed capital’ means such part of the capital which is for the time being subscribed by
the members of a company.
Where any notice, advertisement or other official communication or any business letter, bill head or letter paper
of a company states the authorised capital, the subscribed and paid-up capital must also be stated in equally
conspicuous characters.
A default in this regard will make the company and every officer who is in default liable to pay penalty extending
₹ 10,000 and ₹ 5,000 respectively. [Section 60].
‘Called-up capital’ means such part of the capital, which has been called for payment.
Authorised Capital
Issued Capital
Subscribed Capital
Called-up Capital
Paid-up Capital
7. Shares
• Section 2(84) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines the term ‘share’ which means a share in the share
capital of a company and includes stock.
• Share is an interest in the company [Borland Trustees vs. Steel Bors. & Co. Ltd.]
• It represents such proportion of the interest of the shareholders as the amount paid up thereon
bears to the total capital payable to the company.
• It is a measure of the interest in the company’s assets to which a person holding a share is entitled.
• The shares or debentures or other interests of any member in a company shall be movable
property transferable in the manner provided by the articles of the company [Section 44].
• Every share in a company having a share capital, shall be distinguished by its distinctive number
[Section 45]. (Doesn’t apply in the case of shares held in dematerialised form in the depository)
‘Equity share capital’, with reference to any company limited by shares, means all share capital
which is not preference share capital. It comprises shares
Note: Tata Motors in 2008 introduced equity shares with differential voting rights called ‘A’ equity
shares in its rights issue. In the issue, every 10 ‘A’ equity shares carried only one voting right but
would get 5 percentage points more dividend than that declared on each of the ordinary shares.
Since ‘A’ equity share did not carry the similar voting rights, it was being traded at discount to other
common shares having full voting. Such shares are called equity shares with differential voting
rights (DVRs).
• ‘Preference share capital’, with reference to any company limited by shares, means that part of
the issued share capital of the company which carries or would carry a preferential right
with respect to—
• Capital shall be deemed to be preference capital despite that it is entitled to either or both of
the following rights –
ii) that in respect of capital, in addition to the preferential right to the repayment, on a
winding up, of the amounts specified above, it has a right to participate with capital
In case of private company, Section 43 shall not apply where memorandum or articles of
association of the private company so provides.
8. Memorandum of Association
The Memorandum of Association defines the company’s constitution and the scope of the powers
of the company with which it has been established under the Act. It is the very foundation on which the
whole edifice of the company is built.
• A company cannot enter into a contract or engage in any trade or business, which is
beyond the power confessed on it by the memorandum. If it does so, it would be ultra vires
the company and void.
• The memorandum of the company shall state, in relation to the name clause, the name of the
company with the last word
• Section 8 company –
o Also, for the Companies under section 8 of the Act, the name shall include the words
foundation, Forum, Association, Federation, Chambers, Confederation, council,
Electoral trust, and the like etc.
• Government Company – A Government company’s name must end with the word
‘Limited’.
• One Person Company – In the case of One Person Company, the words ‘One Person
Company’, should be included below its name.
• The objects for which the company is proposed to be incorporated and any matter
considered necessary in furtherance thereof.
• If Company has changed its activities which are not reflected in its name – It shall
change its name in line with its activities within a period of 6 months from the change of
activities after complying with all the provisions as applicable to change of name.
This clause covers details on liability of members of a company, whether limited or unlimited,
and also state –
• In the case of a company limited by guarantee, that the liability of its members is limited
to the amount up to which each member undertakes to contribute –
o to the assets of the company in the event of its being wound-up, for payment of
the debts and liabilities of the company
o to the costs, charges, and expenses of winding-up and for adjustment of the rights of
the contributories among themselves
Every subscriber to the memorandum shall take at least one share and shall write against his
name the number of shares taken by him.
In the case of OPC, the name of the person who, in the event of death of the subscriber, shall
become the member of the company.
The above clauses of the Memorandum are called compulsory clauses, or ‘Conditions’. In addition
to these a memorandum may contain other provisions, for example rights attached to various
classes of shares.
• It should be signed by at least 7 persons (two in the case of a private company and one in the
case of One Person Company) in the presence of at least one witness, who will attest the
signatures. The particulars about the signatories to the memorandum as well as the witness, as
to their address, description, occupation etc., must also be entered.
• The term ultra vires means ‘beyond (their) powers’. The legal phrase “ultra vires” is applicable only
to acts done in excess of the legal powers of the doers.
• When an act is performed, which though legal in itself, is not authorized by the object clause of
the memorandum, or by the statute, it is said to be ultra vires the company, and hence null and
void.
• An act which is ultra vires (i.e., beyond the powers of) is void and does not bind the company.
Neither the company nor the contracting party can sue on it.
▪ If the ultra vires loan has been utilised in meeting lawful debt of the company then the lender
steps into the shoes of the debtor paid off and consequently he would be entitled to recover
his loan to that extent from the company.
o If the act is ultra vires the power of the directors, the shareholders can ratify it,
o If the act is ultra vires the articles of the company, the company can alter the articles,
o If the act is within the power of the company but is done irregularly, shareholder can
validate it.
Judgement: It was held that the contract was null and void. The Court held that the word 'general contractors' had
to be given a restricted meaning. Only such contracts could be covered in the term 'general contractors' as are in
some way related or connected with mechanical engineering. Therefore, the company could not finance the
construction of a railway line by alleging that such a business falls under the business of general contractors.
• The articles of association (AOA) of a company are its rules and regulations, which are framed to
manage its internal affairs.
• Just as the memorandum contains the fundamental conditions upon which the company is allowed
to be incorporated, so also the articles are the internal regulations of the company [Guiness vs. Land
Corporation of Ireland].
• It regulates domestic management of a company and creates certain rights and obligations
between the members and the company [S.S. Rajkumar vs. Perfect Castings (P) Ltd.].
• AOA are the bye-laws of the company according to which director and other officers are required to
perform their functions as regards the management of the company, its accounts and audit
• The articles of a company shall contain the regulations for management of the company.
• The articles shall also contain such matters, as are prescribed under the rules.
• However, a company may also include such additional matters in its articles as may be
considered necessary for its management.
• The articles may contain provisions for entrenchment (to protect something). It is such
provision in AOA that makes certain amendments either more difficult or impossible to
pass, making such amendments inadmissible.
• Where the articles contain provisions for entrenchment, the company shall give notice to the
Registrar of such provisions in such form and manner as may be prescribed.
• A company may adopt all or any of the regulations contained in the model articles applicable
to such company.
• Where the registered articles of a company registered after the commencement of this Act
do not exclude or modify the regulations contained in the model articles applicable to
such company, those regulations shall, so far as applicable, be the regulations of that
company as if they were contained in the duly registered articles of the company.
Basis of
Memorandum of Association (MOA) Articles of Association (AOA)
Difference
Objectives Defines and delimits the objectives of the Lays down the rules and regulations for
company. the internal management of the
company. AOA determine how objectives
of company are to be achieved.
o Every person dealing with the company not only has the constructive notice of the
memorandum and articles, but also of all the other related documents, such as Special
Resolutions etc., which are required to be registered with the Registrar.
Thus, if a person enters a contract which is beyond the powers of the company as defined
in the memorandum, or outside the authority of directors as per memorandum or articles,
he cannot acquire any rights under the contract
against the company.
It is duty of every person dealing
11.2 Doctrine of Indoor Management with a company to inspect its
documents and make sure that
• The Doctrine of Indoor Management is the exception to his contract is in conformity with
the doctrine of constructive notice. their provisions.
• It can be explained with the help of a landmark case: The
Royal British Bank vs. Turquand, and thus, is popularly
known as Turquand Rule.
Judgement: It was decided that the bond was valid as the bank was deemed to be aware that the
directors could borrow only up to the amount resolutions allowed. AOA were registered with Companies
House, so there was constructive notice. But the bank could not be deemed to know which ordinary
resolutions passed, because these were not registrable. The bond was valid because there was no
requirement to look into the company’s internal workings. This is the indoor management rule, that the
company’s indoor affairs are the company’s problem.
Suspicion of
Irregularity
Forgery
Where the person dealing with the company has knowledge of irregularity within the
company, the benefit under the doctrine of indoor management would not be available.
Example : The directors cannot not defend the issue of debentures to themselves because they
should have known that the extent to which they were lending money to the company required
the assent of the general meeting which they had not obtained [Howard vs. Patent Ivory
Manufacturing Co.].
• If there are suspicious grounds surrounding a transaction, but the person dealing with
company fails to make reasonable inquiry, the benefit of doctrine of indoor management
will not be available.
• The doctrine in no way, rewards those who behave negligently. Where the person dealing
with the company is put upon an inquiry, for example, where the transaction is unusual or
not in the ordinary course of business, it is the duty of the outsider to make the necessary
enquiry.
Example : A person accepted a transfer of a company’s property from its accountant. The
transfer was held void as such person could not have supposed, in absence of a power of attorney
that the accountant had authority to effect transfer of the company’s property [Anand Bihari Lal
vs. Dinshaw & Co.].
Case Law: Haughton & Co. v. Nothard, Lowe & Wills Ltd.
Facts: A person holding directorship in two companies agreed to apply the money of one company
in payment of the debt to other.
Judgement: It was held that the situation was something so unusual that the plaintiff (company
which filed the case and for whose debt, payment was applied), should have made an inquiry to
ascertain whether the person (director who had ownership in both companies) making the
contract had any authority in fact to make it.
• The rule of indoor management does not extend to transactions involving forgery.
• In case of forgery, it is not that there is absence of free consent but there is no consent at
all. Since there is no consent at all there is no transaction. Consequently, it is not that the title
of person is defective but there is no title at all.
Learning Outcomes –
• Explain the formation & incorporation of a company (Private Limited/ Public Limited), One Person
company (OPC) and the formation of not for profit organization (Section 8 company).
• Identify the need for Memorandum of Association (MOA) and Articles of Association (AOA) and
changes incidental thereto.
• Know the effect of registration.
• Explain and identify the concept related to registered office of company.
• Know how the service of documents is effected.
• Know about Authentication of documents, proceedings and contracts and Excecution of bills of
exchange, etc.
1.1 Incorporation
The registration procedure is undertaken by ‘Promoters’ of the company. They are the founders of the
company & they pitch the initial ideas for business.
Section 2(69) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines the term “Promoter” which means a person-
a) Who has been named as such in a prospectus or is identified by the company in the annual
return referred to in section 92; or
b) Who has control over the affairs of the company, directly or indirectly whether as a
shareholder, director or otherwise; or
FORMATION OF COMPANY
Section 3 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the basic requirement with respect to the constitution of the
company.
Section 2(62) defines a One Person Company means a company which has only one person as a
member.
One
Public Private
Person
Company Company
Company
7 or more 2 or more
1 person
persons persons
Section 2(22) defines a “company limited by shares” which means a company having the liability
of its members limited by the memorandum to the amount, if any unpaid on the shares
respectively held by them.
Section 2(21) defines a “company limited by guarantee” which means a company having the
liability of its members limited by the memorandum to such amount as the members may
respectively undertake to contribute to the assets of the company in the event of its being
wound up.
Section 2(92) defines an “unlimited company” which means a company not having any limit on
the liability of its members.
Unlimited Company
→ Every person
o who is a member of the company during the time that it so carries on the
business after those 6 months and
o who is cognizant (i.e., aware) of the fact that it is carrying on business with less
than 7 members or 2 members, as the case may be
→ shall be
o severally liable for the payment of the whole debts of the company contracted
during that time (i.e., after 6 months) and
o may be severally sued therefore.
Ltd. by shares
with capital
Ltd. by
Private guarantee without
(including
capital
OPC)
with capital
Unlimited
Company without
capital
Ltd. by shares
with capital
Limited by
guarantee without
Public
capital
with capital
unlimited
without
capital
Section 4 of the Companies Act, 2013 seeks to provide for the requirements with respect to memorandum
of a company.
3.1 Memorandum
Memorandum is the base document for the formation of the company and along with, the Articles of
Association (AOA) is regarded as the Constitution of the Company.
Schedule I):
Shareholders
Every person entering
understands the
into a contract with the
purposes for which his
company is presumed to
money can be used by
have the knowledge of
the company and the
the conditions contained
risk he is taking by
therein
making such investment
The company cannot depart from the provisions contained in the memorandum however
imperative (i.e., utmost imperative) may be the necessity for the departure. If it does so, it would
be ultra-vires the company and void.
• Name Clause
• Object Clause
• Liability Clause
• Capital Clause
• Domicile/ Situation Clause
• Subscription Clause
• Nomination Clause
The memorandum of the company shall state, in relation to the name clause, the name of the
company with the last word
• “Limited” in the case of a public limited company, or
• “Private Limited” in case of a private limited company.
3.4.1 Restrictions on Name of the company
Name of the company should not be:
✓ Offensive
✓ Identical to existing Name of another company
✓ Similar to existing Name of another company
✓ Undesirable w.r.t. the objects of the company
✓ Indicating association with government of India (unless approved by government)
✓ Containing word “national” unless specific permission obtained from central
government
✓ Containing word “bank” unless it is involved in banking business.
A person may make an application in SPICe+ (Simplified Proforma for Incorporating Company
Electronically Plus: INC-32) accompanied by fee, as provided in the Companies (Registration Offices
and Fees) Rules, 2014, to the Registrar for reservation of a name set out in the application as name of
the proposed company.
A person may make an application, using web service RUN (Reserve Unique Name) along with fee as
provided in the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 201
b) Upon receipt of the application, the Registrar may, reserve the name of the company for a
period of 20 days from the date of approval or such other period as may be prescribed.
c) In case of an application for reservation of name or for change of its name by an existing
company, the Registrar may reserve the name for 60 days from the date of approval.
It contains the objects for which the company is proposed to be incorporated and any matter
necessary in furtherance thereof.
Specified IFSC Public Company & IFSC Private company shall state its objects to do financial services
activities as permitted under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 read with SEZ Rules, 2006 and any
matter considered necessary in furtherance thereof in accordance with license to operate, from
International Financial Services Centre located in an approved multi services Special Economic Zone,
granted by the RBI, SEBI, or IRDA
This clause covers details on liability of members of a company, whether limited or unlimited
In case of an OPC, this clause covers the name of the person (i.e., nominee) who in the event of death
of subscriber, shall become the member of the company.
This clause mentions the name of the federal state where the registered office of the company is to
be situated.
It states the purpose of the subscribers to incorporate the company wherein they agree to take the
shares in the company based on the number written in the Memorandum. It contains signatures of
such subscribers.
Section 5 of the Companies Act, 2013 seeks to provide the contents and model of articles of association.
4.1 Articles
Section 2(5) defines “Articles” which means the articles of association of a company as originally framed
or as altered from time to time or applied in pursuance of any previous company law or of this Act.
The articles of a company shall be in respective forms as outlined below (Model Articles -specified
in Schedule I)
✓ The AOA shall contain the regulations for management of the company.
✓ The AOA shall also contain such matters, as are prescribed under the Rules.
✓ However, a company may also include such additional matters in its AOA as may be
considered necessary for its management.
✓ It is such provision in AOA that makes certain amendments either more difficult or
impossible to pass, making such amendments inadmissible.
✓ Time of Entrenchment:
• On formation of a company, or
• By an amendment in the articles
o agreed to by all the members of the company in case of a private company;
and
o by a special resolution in the case of a public company.
✓ Notice to the registrar:
Where the AOA contains provisions for entrenchment, whether made on formation or by
amendment, the company shall give notice to the ROC in such form and manner as may be
prescribed.
The company shall give notice to the Registrar of entrenchment provisions included in article
a. In the SPICe+(Simplified Proforma for Incorporating company Electronically Plus: INC-32), along
with the fee as provided in the Companies (Registration offices and fees) Rules, 2014 at the
time of incorporation of the company, and
b. In case of existing companies, in Form No. MGT-14 within thirty days from the date of
entrenchment of the articles, along with the fee as provided in the Companies (Registration
offices and fees) Rules, 2014
Act done
Act ultra vires
against the Act done against the Act done against the
the directors
Companies Act MOA AOA only
2013
✓ The doctrine of constructive notice is a doctrine where all persons dealing with a company are
deemed (or "construed") to have knowledge of the company's articles of association and
memorandum of association.
✓ The doctrine of indoor management is an exception to this rule.
✓ According to this doctrine, persons dealing with the company cannot be assumed to have
knowledge of internal problems of the company. All stakeholders can simply assume that all
the required things were get done properly in the company.
✓ This doctrine helps protect external members from the company and states that the people
are entitled to presume that internal proceedings are as per documents submitted with the
Registrar of Companies.
The Doctrine of Indoor Management was first laid down in the case of Royal British Bank v.
Turquand
The directors of a company were authorised by the articles to borrow on bonds such sums of
money as should from time to time, by a resolution of the company in general meeting, be
authorised to be borrowed. The directors gave a bond to Turquand without the authority of any
such resolution. The question arose whether the company was liable on the bond. Held, the
company was liable on the bond, as Turquand was entitled to assume that the resolution of the
company in general meeting had been passed
• Knowledge of irregularity: Where the outsider has knowledge of irregularity within the
company, the benefit under the doctrine of indoor management would not be available.
• Negligence: If, with minimum effort, the irregularities within a company could be
discovered by the outsider, the benefit of doctrine of indoor management would not apply.
• Forgery: Where a person relies upon a document that turns out to be forged, the benefit
of doctrine of indoor management would not apply.
Section 6 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that the provisions of this Act shall have an overriding effect.
(b) any provisions contained in the memorandum, articles, agreement, or resolution shall, to the
extent to which it is repugnant (i.e., in conflict) to the provisions of this Act, become or be
void, as the case may be.
Section 10 of the Companies Act, 2013 covers the effects of registration of the memorandum and articles.
1) MOA and AOA shall bind the company and the members thereof and
2) All monies which are payable by any member to the company under the memorandum
or articles shall be a debt due from him to the company.
Thus, based on MOA and AOA:
Hence, a company can recover calls in arrear from a member as forcefully as it is recovering a loan.
INCORPORATION OF COMPANY
Section 7 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for the procedure to be followed for incorporation of a
company.
10.1.2 Drafting and signing of MOA and AOA and its submission to ROC.
✓ Predefined formats given in Schedule I can be used for drafting the MOA and AOA.
✓ These documents have to be e-filed and e-stamped.
On and from the date mentioned in the certificate of incorporation, the Registrar shall allot to
the company a corporate identity number, which shall be a distinct identity for the company
and which shall also be included in the certificate of incorporation.
The first character – L (reveals listing status, L for listed and U for unlisted, for instance Infosys is
Listed one)
The next two letters – KA (reveals the Indian state where the company is registered, for instance
KA is for Karnataka)
The next four digits – 1981 (reveals the year of incorporation of a company)
The next three characters – PLC (reveals the company classification - PLC for public, PTC for
private, FTC for foreign, and GOI for government)
The last six digits – 013115 (reveals registration number with concerned ROC
For the registration of the company, the following documents and information are to be filed with
the registrar within whose jurisdiction the registered office of the company is proposed to be
situated –
i. The MOA and AOA duly signed by all the subscribers to the memorandum.
ii. A declaration that all the requirements of this act and rules thereunder in respect of
registration and related matters have been complied with. This declaration is to be made
by:
• Person who is engaged in the formation of the company (i.e., an advocate, a CA, CS, or CWA in
practice) and
• A person named in the articles (director, manager, or secretary of the company)
iii. A declaration from each of the subscribers and from the persons named as first
directors, if any, in the articles, stating that –
• He is not convicted of any offence in connection with the promotion, formation, or
management of the company, or
• He has not been found guilty of any fraud or misfeasance or of any breach of duty to any
company during the last 5 years, and
• That all the documents filed with the registrar for registration of the company contains
information that is correct, complete, and true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
vi. The particulars (name, DIN, residential address, nationality) of persons mentioned in the
articles as the first directors and such other particulars as may be prescribed.
vii. The particulars of interests of the persons mentioned in the AOA as first directors in other
firms or body corporates along with their consent to act as directors in such form and
manner as may be prescribed.
The duly signed memorandum of association and articles of
association (Ch2a)
Note:
Form No. INC-8 is prescribed form for Declaration of Compliance by Professional & Director,
Manager or Secretary of company
Form No. INC-9 is prescribed form for Declaration by subscribers to the memorandum and
persons named as the first directors
Following particulars of every subscriber to the memorandum shall be filled;
a. Name (including surname or family name) and recent Photograph affixed
b. Father’s/Mother’s name
c. Nationality, Proof of nationality in case the subscriber is a foreign national
d. Date and Place of Birth (District and State)
e. Educational qualification and Occupation
f. Permanent Account Number
g. Email id and Phone number of Subscriber
h. Permanent residential address and also Present address
i. Residential proof such as Bank Statement, Electricity Bill, Telephone / Mobile Bill, provided
that Bank statement Electricity bill, Telephone or Mobile bill shall not be more than two
months old
j. Proof of Identity (For Indian Nationals - Voter’s identity card, Passport copy, Driving License
copy, Unique Identification Number (UIN) & for Foreign nationals and Non Resident Indians –
Passport)
k. If the subscriber is already a director or promoter of a company(s), the particulars relating to
name of the company; Corporate Identity Number; Whether interested as a director or
promoter
Where the subscriber to the memorandum is a body corporate, then the following particulars
shall be filed with the Registrar
a. The name of the body corporate and Corporate Identity Number of the Company or
Registration number of the body corporate, if any
b. GLN, if any
c. The registered office address or principal place of business
d. E-mail Id
An application for registration of a company shall be filed, with the Registrar within whose
jurisdiction the registered office of the company is proposed to be situated, in SPICe+(Simplified
Proforma for Incorporating company Electronically Plus: INC32) along with the fee as provided
under the Companies (Registration offices and fees) Rules, 2014 accompanied by following
documents and information;
SPICe+ is an integrated Web form offering 10 services by 3 Central Govt. Ministries &
Departments. (Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Ministry of Labour & Department of Revenue in the
Ministry of Finance) thereby saving as many procedures, time and cost for starting a business in
India. SPICe+ is initiatives towards Ease of Doing Business. Students may refer to FAQs on
SPICe+ form at MCAs’ website for more details
https://www.mca.gov.in/MinistryV2/spicefaq.html
The memorandum (e-MOA in Form No. INC-33) and article (e-AOA in Form No. INC-34) of
company so furnished shall be duly signed by all the subscribers to the memorandum in the
manner prescribed by rule 13 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014 as stated below:
a. Each subscriber shall add his name, address, description & occupation, if any, in the
presence of at least one witness who shall attest the signature, shall sign and add his
name, address, description and occupation, if any.
b. Where a subscriber is illiterate, he shall affix his thumb impression or mark which shall be
described as such by the person, writing for him, who shall place the name of the subscriber
against or below the mark and authenticate it by his own signature and he shall also write
against the name of the subscriber, the number of shares taken by him.
Note: The type written or printed particulars of the subscribers and witnesses shall be allowed as if it
is written, so long as appends signature or thumb impression.
c. Where the subscriber is a body corporate, the memorandum and articles of association shall
be signed by director, officer or employee of the body corporate duly authorized in this
behalf by a resolution of the board of directors.
d. Where the subscriber is a Limited Liability Partnership, it shall be signed by a partner of
the Limited Liability Partnership, duly authorized by a resolution approved by all the
partners of the Limited Liability Partnership:
Note: In either case c or d stated above, the person so authorized shall not, at the same time, be
a subscriber to the memorandum and articles of Association.
In case any of the objects of a company requires registration or approval from sectoral regulators such
as the RBI and SEBI, then such registration or approval shall be obtained by the proposed company
before pursuing such objects and a declaration in this behalf shall be submitted at the stage of
incorporation. In case of a Company being incorporated as a Nidhi, the declaration by the Central
Government under Section 406 of the Act shall be obtained by the Nidhi before commencing the
business and a declaration in this behalf shall be submitted at the stage of incorporation by the
Company
The company shall maintain and preserve at its registered office copies of all documents and
information as originally filed, till its dissolution under this Act.
10.4 Furnishing of false or incorrect information or suppression of material fact at the time of
incorporation
✓ If any person furnishes any false or incorrect information or suppresses any material information,
of which he is aware in any of the documents filed with the Registrar in relation to registration of
company, he shall be held liable for action for fraud u/s 447.
✓ If the company has already been incorporated by furnishing false or incorrect information
or suppressing any material fact: - the promoters, persons named as first directors, persons
making declaration shall each be held liable for fraud u/s 447.
✓ Order of the Tribunal: The Tribunal may, on an application made to it, on being satisfied that
the situation so warrants –
o Pass such orders as it thinks fit for regulation of management of the company
including changes, if any, in its MOA and AOA; or
o Direct that liability of the members shall be unlimited; or
o Direct the removal of name of company from the Register of companies; or
o Pass an order for winding up of the company; or
o Pass such orders as it thinks fit.
EFFECT OF REGISTRATION
Section 9 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the effect of registration of a company.
From the date of incorporation, the subscribers to the memorandum and all other persons, who may
from time to time become members of the company,
Section 10A of the Companies Act, 2013 covers the provisions relating to commencement of
business after incorporation of a company.
A company incorporated after the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019
and having a share capital shall not commence any business or exercise any borrowing power unless –
(a) A declaration is filed by a director within a period of 180 days of the date of incorporation of
the company with the Registrar that every subscriber to the memorandum has paid the value
of the shares agreed to be taken by him on the date of making such declaration: and
(b) The company has filed with the Registrar a verification of its registered office.
Rule 23A of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014 states that the declaration u/s 10A by the director shall
be in the prescribed form with prescribed fees and the contents of the form shall be verified by a CS/CA/CWA, in
practice.
Where no declaration has been filed with the registrar u/s 10A(1)(a) within 180 days and
→ the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe that the company is not carrying on any
business or operations,
→ he may initiate action for removal of name of Company from the register of
Companies.
Section 21 of the Companies Act, 2013 covers the provisions relating to authentication of
documents or proceedings or contracts made by or on behalf of a company.
13.1 Authentication
ii. An officer or employee of the company duly authorized by the Board in this behalf.
Section 2(51) defines “Key managerial personnel”, (KMP) in relation to a company, which means-
Section 22 of Companies Act, 2013 covers provisions relating to execution of Bills of exchange,
hundi and promissory note and other deeds.
(1) A bill of exchange, hundi, or promissory note shall be deemed to have been made, accepted,
drawn or endorsed on behalf of a company, if –
→ If the company has common seal: Company may, by writing under its common seal,
authorize any person, either generally or for specified matters, as its attorney to execute
other deeds on its behalf in any place in or outside India.
(3) A deed signed by such an attorney on behalf of the company and under his seal shall bind the
company.
Yes No
Authorisation shall be
Company may, in writing made by
under its common seal,
authorize any person as its 2 directors If company has
attorney to execute other company secretary
deeds on its behalf in any
place in or outside India.
By a director+ CS
SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS
Section 20 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the mode in which documents may be served on the
company, on the members and on the registrars.
A document may be served on a company or an officer thereof by sending it to the company or the
officer at the registered office of the company by-
→ A member may request for delivery of any document through a particular mode, for
which he shall pay such fees as may be determined by the company in its AGM.
→ Where the Act or Rules made thereof provided for filing of documents with the Registrar
in electronic mode, it shall only be filed in electronic mode.
15.3 Time when service is effected
In case of delivery by post, such service shall be deemed to have been effected-
→ In case of notice of meeting : at the expiration of 48 hours after the notice is posted; and
→ In other case: at the time at which the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of
post.
Section 19 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to holding of shares by
subsidiary company in its holding company.
Holding company in relation to one or more other companies, means a company of which such
companies are subsidiary companies.
Subsidiary company or subsidiary, in relation to any other company, means a company in which the
holding company –
16.3 Subsidiary company not to hold shares in the Holding Company [Section 19]
Exceptions:
Example:
→ RPIP Ltd. has invested 51% in the shares of SSP Pvt. Ltd. on 31st March 2019.
→ SSP Pvt. Ltd. have been holding 2% equity of RPIP Ltd. since 2013.
→ SSP Pvt. Ltd. cannot increase its equity beyond that 2% on or after 31st March 2019.
→ However, it could continue to hold or reduce its initial 2% stake.
If a company on its first registration, or on its registration by a new name, is registered by a name which,
in the opinion of the Central Government (CG),
→ is identical with or too nearly resembles the name by which a company in existence had
been previously registered,
Section 16 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to rectification of the
name of a company.
If a company on its first registration, or on its registration by a new name, is registered by a name
which, on an application by a registered proprietor of a trademark,
Where a company changes its name or obtains a new name, it shall within a period of 15 days from
the date of such change, give notice of change to the Registrar along with the order of CG, who
shall carry out necessary changes in the certificate of incorporation and the memorandum.
17.4 Default
• Central Government shall allot new name to company in such manner as may be prescribed
and
• Registrar shall enter new name in register of companies in place of old name and issue a fresh
certificate of incorporation with new name, which the company shall use thereafter
• Provided that it shall NOT prevent a company from subsequently changing its name in
accordance with the provisions of section 13
Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013 seeks to provide for the registered office of the companies for the
communication and serving of necessary documents, notices, letters etc.
The registered office of a company should be a physical office where the corporation will receive service
of legal documents from ROC or in case of lawsuit, etc. This address cannot be a P.O. box but must be
a physical location where someone is present, to receive service of legal documents during normal
business hours.
✓ Paint, or affix its name and the address of its registered office, and keep the same
painted and affixed, on the outside of every office or place in which its business is
carried on, in a conspicuous position, in legible letters, and
→ If the characters employed are not those of the language in general use in that
locality, then also in the characters of that language.
✓ Have its name engraved in legible characters on its seal, if any.
✓ Get its name, registered office address, CIN, telephone number, fax number, email, and
website address, if any, printed in all its business letters, bill heads, letter papers and in
all its notices and other official publications.
✓ Have its name printed on hundis, promissory notes, bills of exchange and such other
documents as may be prescribed.
The alteration of the memorandum relating to the place of the registered office from one State to
another shall not have any effect unless it is approved by the Central Government (power delegated to
Regional Director by Central Government) 30 on an application in Form No. INC-23 along with the fee
and shall be accompanied by the following documents, namely;
b. Copy of the minutes of the general meeting at which the resolution authorising such alteration
was passed, giving details of the number of votes cast in favour or against the resolution;
c. Copy of Board Resolution or Power of Attorney or the executed vakalatnama, as the case may
be.
Change in Place
Board Reolution Special Resolution Special Resolution Clause [covered
by Section
13(4),(5),(6)]
Permission of
Notice to ROC Notice to ROC
Regional Director
within 30 days within 30 days
(RD)
30/60/30
RD/Co./ROC
Certificate -
Conclusive
evidence
✓ If any default is made in complying with the requirements of this section, the company and
every officer in default shall be punishable with a penalty of
→ Rs. 1,000/- for each day during which the default continues
→ but not exceeding Rs. 1,00,000/-. [Sub-section (8)]
✓ If the ROC has reasonable cause to believe that company is not carrying on any business or
operations,
→ He may cause a physical verification of the registered office of the company in
prescribed manner and
→ If any default is found to be made in complying with the requirements of sub-section
(1),
→ He may without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (8), initiate action for the
removal of the name of the company from the register of companies.
Section 18 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to conversion of a company to
some other class of company.
Where such conversion is required to be done, the company shall file an application to the
Registrar.
The Registrar shall, after satisfying himself that the provisions applicable for registration of
companies have been complied with, close the former registration of the company.
After registering the required documents, the Registrar shall issue a certificate of
incorporation.
The conversion of companies shall not affect any debts, liablities, obligations or contracts
incurred or enterd into, by or on behalf of the company before the conversion. Such debts
etc may be enforced in the manner as if such registration had not been done.
ALTERATION OF ARTICLES
Section 14 of the Companies Act, 2013 vests companies with power to alter or add to its articles.
a) Subject to the provisions of the Act and the conditions contained in the MOA, a company may, by
a special resolution, alter its Articles.
b) Alteration of Articles include the alterations having the effect of conversion of-
c) An alteration having the effect of conversion of a public company into a private company
shall be valid only if it is approved by the Central Government, on an application made by
the company.
d) Every alteration of AOA and a copy of the order of the Central Government approving the
order, shall be filed with the Registrar, together with a copy of the altered AOA, within 15 days,
who shall register the same.
e) Every alteration made in the AOA shall be noted in every copy of the AOA.
f) ALTERATION BY SPECIAL RESOLUTION
Any alteration having the effect of conversion of a public company into a private company shall
not be valid unless it is approved by an order of the Central Government on an application
made within sixty days from the date of passing of special resolution, be filed with Regional
Director in e-Form No. RD-1 along with the fee as provided in the Companies (Registration
Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 and shall be accompanied by the following documents, namely;
g) Penalty on default: The company and every officer in default shall be liable to a penalty of Rs.
1,000/- for every copy of AOA issued without such alterations.
ALTERATION OF MEMORANDUM
Section 13 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions that deal with the alteration of the
memorandum.
Section 15 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that the alteration of MOA/AOA shall be noted in every copy
of the MOA/AOA.
Company may alter the provisions of its MOA with the approval of the members by a Special
resolution.
✓ Name change shall be effected only with the approval of the CG in writing.
→ However, such approval of CG is not necessary where the change in the name is
related only to addition/ deletion of the word “Private” upon conversion of any class
of company into another.
✓ Name change is not allowed to a company which has not filed annual returns or financial
statements with the Registrar or failed to pay or repay matured deposits or debentures or
interest thereon.
✓ On change of name, the ROC shall
→ enter the new name in the Register of companies, in the place of the old name and
→ shall issue a fresh certificate of incorporation with the new name, and
→ the change in name shall be complete and effective only on the issue of such a
certificate.
✓ The alteration of the MOA with respect to place of registered office from one State to
another shall not have any effect unless it is approved by the Central Government on an
application filed to it.
✓ Once the Central Government is satisfied upon these verifications, it shall dispose off the
application within 60 days.
✓ The Registrar of the State to which the registered office is being shifted to, shall issue a
fresh certificate of incorporation indicating the alteration.
The change in liability which results in increase in liability of any shareholder shall not be valid
without the consent of such shareholder.
Every alteration of MOA should be approved by the company by passing a Special resolution u/s 13.
Apart from this, Section 61 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the power of limited company to
alter its capital clause.
→ A limited company having a share capital may, if so authorized by its Articles, alter its
share capital by passing an ordinary resolution.
→ The notice of such alteration must be given to the registrar within 30 days of such
alteration in Form SH-7 with the certified true copy of ordinary resolution along with the
explanatory statement and altered copy of the MOA.
→ A company, which has raised money from the public through prospectus and still has
any unutilized amount out of the money so raised, shall not change its objects for which
it raised the money unless a special resolution through postal ballot is passed by the
company.
→ Also, the details of such resolution shall be placed on the website of the company, if any,
indicating therein the reason for such change.
→ The registrar shall register any alteration of the MOA with respect to the objects of the
company and certify the registration within 30 days from the date of filing the special
resolution.
✓ Every alteration made in the MOA /AOA of a company shall be noted in every copy of the
memorandum or articles, as the case may be.
✓ If the company defaults: The company and every officer in default shall be liable to a
penalty of Rs. 1,000/- for every copy of the MOA/AOA issued without alteration.
Section 17 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions that deal with providing the members of
the company with the copies of MOA/AOA.
In case of default: The company and every officer in default shall be liable for each default, to a penalty
of Rs. 1,000/- for each day during which the default continues, subject to a maximum of Rs. 1,00,000/-
✓ The MOA of a One Person company shall indicate the name of the other person (i.e.,
Nominee), with his prior consent in the prescribed form, who shall, in the event of death of
the subscriber or his incapacity to contract become the member of the company, and
✓ Such nominee may, at any time, withdraw his consent in such manner as may be
prescribed.
✓ The member of OPC may, at any time, change the name of the Nominee by giving a notice
in such manner as may be prescribed.
✓ It shall be the duty of the member of OPC to intimate the company the change, if any, in
the name of the Nominee by indicating in the MOA or otherwise within such time and in such
manner as may be prescribed. However, any change in the name of Nominee shall not be
deemed to be an alteration of the MOA.
i. A natural person,
ii. An Indian citizen, whether resident in India or
otherwise Can a minor start a OPC for
(Resident in India means a person who has stayed in India his benefit through his
for a period of not less than 120 days during the guardian?
immediately preceding financial year). Ans: No. A minor cannot hold
iii. Not a minor. shares of OPC with beneficial
interest.
23.3 Member/ Nominee of not more than one OPC
✓ A natural person shall not be a member of more than one OPC at any point of time and the
said person shall not be a nominee of more than one OPC.
This means that a person can be the member of one OPC and nominee of another one OPC at the same time.
However, no person can be the member/nominee of more than one OPC at the same time.
ii. OPC cannot carry out Non-Banking Financial Investment activities including
investment in securities of any body corporate.
Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the formation of not-for-profit companies.
✓ To promote the charitable objects of commerce, art, science, sports, education, research,
social welfare, religion, charity, protection of environment etc.
✓ Such company intends to apply its profit in promoting its objects.
✓ Section 8 company prohibits the payment of any dividend to its members.
24.2 Power of Central Government to issue the license
The Central Government shall register such person or association of person as a company with limited
liability without the addition of the words ‘Limited’ or ‘Private Limited’ to its name, by issuing
license on such conditions as it deems fit.
The Registrar shall on application register such person or association of persons as a company under
this Section.
A person or an association of persons desirous of incorporating a company with limited liability under
section 8(1), shall make an application to registrar in Form SPICe+ (Simplified Proforma for
Incorporating company Electronically Plus: INC- 32) along with the fee as provided in the Companies
(Registration offices and fees) Rules, 2014.
The application furnished as specified above shall be accompanied by the following documents;
a. The memorandum and articles of association of the proposed company in the Form No. INC-
13 and Form No. INC-31, respectively;
b. An estimate of the future annual income and expenditure of the company for next three
years, specifying the sources of the income and the objects of the expenditure;
c. The declaration in by an Advocate, a Chartered Accountant, cost accountant or Company
Secretary in practice Form No. INC-14 and by each of the persons making the application in
Form No. INC-15, that;
the memorandum and articles of association have been drawn up in conformity with
the provisions of section 8 and rules made thereunder and
all the requirements of the Act and the rules made thereunder relating to registration
of the company under section 8 and matters incidental or supplemental thereto have
i. On registration, the Section 8 company shall enjoy same privileges and obligations as of
a limited company.
iii. Shall not alter the provisions of its MOA/AOA except with the previous approval of the
Central Government.
iv. Section 8 company which intends to convert itself into a company of any other kind shall
pass a special resolution at a general meeting for approving such conversion.
v. Can call its general meeting by giving a clear 14 days notice instead of 21 days.
vi. Requirement of minimum number of directors, independent directors does not apply.
vii. Need not constitute Nomination and Remuneration Committee and Shareholders
Relationship Committee.
Before such revocation the Central Government must give it a written notice of its intention to revoke
the license and opportunity of being heard.
✓ The Registrar shall put the words ‘Limited’ or ‘Private Limited’ against the companies
name in the register.
✓ The Central Government may, by order, if it is satisfied that it is essential in the public
interest, direct that the company be wound up under this Act or amalgamated with
another company registered under this Section and having similar objects, after giving the
company an opportunity of being heard.
✓ If upon winding up or dissolution, there remains, after the satisfaction of its debts and
liabilities, any asset,
→ they may be transferred to another company registered under this Section and
having similar objects, subject to such conditions as Tribunal may impose, or
→ may be sold and proceeds thereof credited to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fund.
A company registered under this section may convert itself into company of any other kind only after
complying with such conditions as may be prescribed in rule 21 and 22 of the Companies
(Incorporation) Rule 2014 as described below;
a. A company shall pass a special resolution at a general meeting for approving such
conversion
b. An explanatory statement to notice of such general meeting must set-out the details on
reason of such conversion.
c. The company shall file an application in Form No. INC-18 with the Regional Director with the
fee along with a certified true copy of the special resolution and a copy of the Notice
convening the meeting including the explanatory statement for approval for conversion.
Also attach the proof of serving of the notice served by registered post or hand delivery,
to:
1. the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax having jurisdiction over the company,
2. Income Tax Officer who has jurisdiction over the company,
4. the Chief Secretary of the State in which the registered office of the company is situated,
5. any organisation or Department of the Central Government or State Government or other
authority under whose jurisdiction the company has been operating.
Note: If any of these authorities wish to make any representation to Regional Director, it shall do so
within sixty days of the receipt of the notice, after giving an opportunity to the Company.
d. A copy of the application with annexures as filed with the Regional Director shall also be
filed with the Registrar.
The company shall, within a week from the date of submitting the application to the Regional
Director, publish a notice at its own expense, and a copy of the notice, as published, shall be sent
forthwith to the Regional Director and the said notice shall be in Form No. INC-19 and shall be
published;
1. at least once in a vernacular newspaper in the principal vernacular language of the district
in which the registered office of the company is situated, and having a wide circulation in that
district, and at least once in English language in an English newspaper having a wide
circulation in that district; and
2. on the website of the company, if any, and as may be notified or directed by the Central
Government.
e. The company should have filed all its financial statements and Annual Returns upto the
financial year preceding the submission of the application to the Regional Director and all
other returns required to be filed under the Act up to the date of submitting the application
to the Regional Director
f. On receipt of the application, and on being satisfied , the Regional Director shall issue an order
approving the conversion of the company into a company of any other kind subject to such
terms and conditions as may be imposed in the facts and circumstances of each case.
g. Before imposing the conditions or rejecting the application, the company shall be given a
reasonable opportunity of being heard by the Regional Director
h. On receipt of the approval of the Regional Director, the company shall convene a general
meeting of its members to pass a special resolution for amending its memorandum of
association and articles of association and the Company shall thereafter file these with the
Registrar (with declaration to adhere conditions if any, imposed by Regional Director)
i. On receipt of the documents referred above, the Registrar shall register the documents and
issue the fresh Certificate of Incorporation.
• Company:
→ Fine: varying from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 1 Crore.
• Director and every officer in default:
→ Fine: varying from Rs. 25,000/- to Rs. 25 lakhs,
→ Where the affairs of the company were conducted fraudulently, every officer in
default shall be liable for action u/s 447.
Memorandum
Incorporation Documents Other Provisions
and Articles
Documents Commence
Article (AOA) Authentication
required Business
[Section 5] [Section 21]
[Section 7] [Section 10A]
Learning Outcomes –
• Define prospectus
• Understand various types of prospectus
• Explain the procedure for issue of prospectus and other related concepts
• Know abot the criminal and civil liability for mis-statements in prospectus and punishment fr
fraudulently inducing persons to invest money
• Understand the procedre for allotment of securities by companies
• Know the procedure of private placement of securities.
INTRODUCTION
The provisions relating to raising of capital such as issue of prospectus, allotment of securities etc., and
other matters incidental thereto are contained in Chapter III of the Companies Act, 2013. This Chapter
is divided into two parts:
The provisions contained in Part I and II are supplemented by the Companies (Prospectus and
Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014.
Section 23 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to public offer, private placement,
right issue and bonus shares issue.
Bonus Issue ✓ ✓
Private Placement ✓ ✓
Public offer
Note:
To bring ease to doing business for corporates, Sub-section 3 and 4 to section 23 of the Act inserted
vide, the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 (enforced w.e.f 28th September 2020) Prior to
Amendments of 2020
Indian companies can access the overseas equity markets only through depository receipts (e.g.
American Depository Receipts (ADRs) or Global Depository Receipts (GDRs) or by listing their debt
securities (such as, foreign currency convertible bonds, masala bonds, etc.) on foreign markets.
Since more and more businesses are going global & capital raised from across the border is cost
effective, hence section 23(3) is inserted to open ways of overseas direct listing for notified class of
In a direct listing, a domestic company can enlist itself with the stock exchanges of other countries
without an intermediary. Unlike American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) and Global Depositary Receipts
(GDRs), the Indian company can directly offer their shares in foreign markets instead of giving them to
a foreign depository bank. Direct listing excludes intermediaries, decreases the overall transaction
cost, and increases transparency.
Section 23(4) of the Act empowers the Central Government to exempt any class or classes of public
companies from complying with the provisions of Chapter III (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities),
Chapter IV (Share Capital and Debentures), section 89 (Declaration in respect of a beneficial interest in
any share), section 90 (Register of significant beneficial owners in a company) or section 127
(Punishment for failure to distribute dividends) of the Act, by issuing notification.
Securities and Exchange Board of India is empower to administer those provisions under chapter III
and IV of the Act, which pertains to issue & transfer of securities and non-payment of dividend; by
listed companies or those companies which intend to get their securities listed on any recognised
stock exchange in India, by making regulations in this behalf.
All other matters (including matters relating to prospectus, return of allotment, redemption of
preference shares) specifically provided in this Act, shall be administered by the Central Government,
Tribunal or the Registrar, as the case may be.
SECURITIES
Section 2 (81) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines the term Securities which means the securities as
defined in clause (h) of Section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 [SCRA].
PROSPECTUS
Prospectus
Section 26 of the Companies Act, 2013 mentions the various matters which are to be stated in a prospectus.
4.2.1 Prospectus to be dated and signed and to state specified information, etc.
Every prospectus issued by or on behalf of
Exceptions:
A prospectus issued shall not include a statement purporting to be made by an expert unless 2
conditions are satisfied:
i) The expert is a person who is not, and who has not been, engaged or interested in the
formation or promotion or management of the company, and
ii) He has given his written consent to the issue of the prospectus and
→ has not withdrawn such consent before the delivery of a copy of the prospectus to
the Registrar and
→ a statement to that effect has been included in the prospectus.
Every prospectus issued shall, on the face of it, state the following matters:
→ State that a copy has been delivered for filing to the ROC
→ Specify any documents required to be attached to the copy delivered or refer to the
statements included in the prospectus which specify these documents.
No prospectus shall be valid if it is issued more than 90 days after the date on which a copy
thereof is delivered to the ROC
Fine:
Any person who is knowingly a
party to such issue Not less than Rs. 50,000 but which
may extend to Rs. 3,00,000.
Section 29 of the Companies Act, 2013 along with the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules,
2014 [PAS Rules] contain provisions which require public offer of securities to be in dematerialised form.
→ Following companies shall issue securities only in dematerialised form by complying with the
provisions of Depositories Act, 1996:
• Every company making public offer, and
• Such other class/ classes of companies as may be prescribed.
→ In case of such class or classes of unlisted companies as may be prescribed, the securities shall
be held or transferred only in dematerialised form in the manner laid down in the Depositories
Act, 1996 and the regulations made thereunder [Sub-section (1A)].
→ Any company, other than a company mentioned above, may convert its securities into
dematerialised form or issue its securities in physical form in accordance with the provisions
of this Act or in dematerialised form in accordance with the provisions of the Depositories Act,
1996 and the regulations made thereunder [Sub-section (2)].
Section 30 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the rules relating advertisement of the prospectus.
• Objects,
• The liability of members and amount of share capital of the company,
• The names of subscribers to the MOA,
• The number of subscribers,
• The number of shares subscribed by each subscriber to the memorandum,
• The capital structure of the company.
Section 31 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions relating to Shelf Prospectus.
It is the prospectus with the shelf life, i.e., a validity period. In this type of public offering,
company is allowed to offer and sell securities to the public without a separate prospectus for
each act of offering.
→ Any class or classes of companies as provided may file a shelf prospectus with the ROC at
the stage of the first offer of securities which shall indicate a period not exceeding 1 year
as the period of validity and,
→ in respect of subsequent offer within that validity period, not further prospectus is
required.
The period of validity shall commence from the date of opening of the first offer of securities
under that prospectus.
Section 32 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions relating to Red-herring Prospectus.
In this kind of public offering, the Price and quantity of shares to be allotted are not included
in prospectus. Thus the prospectus is incomplete.
Developments taking place in the financial markets from time to time allow innovative methods of
raising funds so as to avail the most of favourable market conditions. Timing the issue and book
building of issue are facilitated by the concept of red herring prospectus whereby the price per
security and number of securities are left open to be decided post closure of the issue.
Upon closing of the offer, the prospectus stating the total capital raised (by debt/share capital)
and closing price of securities along with other prescribed details, shall be filed with the ROC
and SEBI.
As per Section 2(1), ‘Abridged Prospectus’ means a memorandum containing such salient
features of a prospectus as may be specified by the SEBI.
In fact, ‘Abridged Prospectus’ is a summarized form of actual prospectus, containing the salient
features of a prospectus to cut the cost involved in the publication of large number of
prospectus which has to accompany the application forms for shares or debentures in case
of public offer.
Section 33(1) provides that every application form for shares or debentures has to be accompanied
with the abridged prospectus.
Proviso to sub-section 1 provides exceptions, when the requirement of abridged prospectus does not
apply;
a. When application form is issued in connection with a bona fide invitation to a person
to enter into an underwriting agreement with respect to shares or debentures:
b. In relation to shares or debentures which were not offered to the public; or
c. Where offer is made to existing members of the company.
4.7.4 Right to receive prospectus [Sub-section 2]
A company who makes any default in complying with the provisions of section 33, shall
be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees for each default.
Section 25 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that a document by which offer of securities to
the public is made, shall be a deemed prospectus.
→ Where a company allots or agrees to allot any securities of the company (i.e., private
placement)
→ with a view to all or any of those securities being offered for sale to the public,
→ any document by which the offer for sale to the public is made shall be deemed to be a
prospectus issued by the company.
→ All the enactments and rules of law as to the contents of prospectus shall apply to the
deemed prospectus.
Any private placement of securities made by a company shall be considered as securities offered
for sale to the public, if it is shown that –
a) An offer of the securities or any of them for sale to the public was made within 6
months of allotment or agreement to allot; OR
b) At the date when the offer was made, the whole consideration to be received by the
company in respect of the securities has not been received by it.
CASE LAW
Above Sub-section of section 25 are not exhaustive in nature, there may be certain other
situations when issuing document may construe as deemed prospectus.
SEBI v Kunnamkulam Paper Mills Ltd Where a rights issue is made to existing members with
a right to renounce in favour of others, if the number of such others exceeds fifty, it also
becomes a deemed prospectus
4.8.2 Additional matters to be stated in the prospectus in an offer for sale to the public
a) The net amount of consideration received or to be received by the company in respect of
the securities to which the offer relates.
b) The time and place at which the contract where under the said securities have been or
are to be allotted may be inspected.
Where a person making the OFS to the public is a company / firm, the deemed prospectus shall
be signed by:
Since the provisions of the Act relating to prospectus and the penal provisions are attracted only when
The term public is not restricted to the public at large. It includes any section of the public, it is
immaterial howsoever such section is selected.
Public connotes persons not personally known to the promoter as distinguished from his own
friends, relatives, connections and acquaintances.
Re, South of England Natural Gas and Petroleum Co. Ltd
Facts – 3000 copies of a document which was offered for subscription of shares in a company and
which was headed “For Private Circulation only,” circulated to the members of certain number of gas
companies only.
Legal Question – Was this a prospectus? Should it contain the particulars required by the Act?
– It was decided that though the offer was only to limited class, it was not less than an offer to the
public in any sense, because those persons from limited class were nonetheless the public. Hence,
the distribution of a document entitled, “For Private Circulation only” offering the company shares was
an offer to the public and their document was a prospectus. Therefore, it must contain the particulars
required by the Act.
2. Whether a single private communication tantamount to issue; can it be construe to a
prospectus to attract the provisions of the Act?
The term "issue" is not satisfied by a single private communication. There must be some measure of
publicity, however modest. A private communication is not thus open and does not construe to be a
prospectus, hence not attracting the provisions of the Act.
Nash Vs Lynde
Facts – Nash applied for certain shares in a company on the basis of a document sent to him by Lynde,
the managing director of the company. The document was marked ‘strictly private and confidential’.
The document did not contain all the material facts required by the Act to be disclosed. Nash filed a
suit for compensation for loss suffered by him by reason of the Omissions.
Decision – Suit was dismissed.
Viscount Summer’s landmark dictum in this case is worth to consider here as basis of above
answer. “The public in the definition is of course a general word, no particular number are prescribed.
Anything from two to infinity may serve, perhaps even one if he is intended to be the first of a series of
subscribers but made further proceedings needless by himself subscribing the whole. The point is
that the offer is such as to be opened to anyone who brings his money and applies in due from,
whether the prospectus was addressed to him on behalf of the company or not. A private
communication is not thus open and does not construe to be a prospectus.”
Red-herring Abridged
Shelf prospectus Deemed
prospectus Prospects
[Section 31] propsectus
[Section 32] [Section 2(1)
Section 28 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions which regulate the offer for sale of
securities by certain members of company.
→ Members may offer whole or part of their shareholding for sale to public provided BOD
approves.
→ Document offered to public inviting subscription shall be Deemed Prospectus. All provisions
applicable to normal prospectus shall apply.
(1) The provisions of Prospectus and Allotment of Securities and rules made thereunder shall be
applicable to an offer of sale referred to in Section 28 except for the following: -
(2) The prospectus issued u/s 28 shall disclose the name of the person or persons or entity
bearing the cost of making the offer of sale along with reasons.
Section 27 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions relating to variation in terms of contract or
objects in prospectus.
The company shall not use any amount raised by it through prospectus for buying, trading or otherwise dealing
in equity shares of any other listed company.
(2) The advertisement of the notice for getting the SR passed shall be in Form PAS – 1. It shall
be published simultaneously with dispatch of Postal Ballot notices to the shareholders.
(3) The notice shall also be placed on the website of the company, if any.
Rule 9A of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 mentions about
securities in dematerialised form by unlisted public companies.
Every unlisted public company (excluding Nidhi Company, Government Company, and a wholly owned
subsidiary) shall issue the securities only in dematerialised form and also facilitate
dematerialisation of all existing securities.
5.3 Responsibility of every holder of securities of an unlisted public company [Rule 9A(3)]
→ Who intends to transfer such securities shall get the securities dematerialised before
the transfer or
5.5 Obligations of every unlisted public company [Rule 9A(5 & 6)]
Maintain security deposit, at all times, of not less than 2 years fees
No unlisted public company which has failed to comply with above obligations shall make an
offer of any securities or buyback its securities or issue any bonus or right shares till the payments
to depositories or registrar or share transfer agent are made. [Sub-rule 6]
The provisions of –
✓ Grievances of the security holders of unlisted public companies under Rule 9A shall be filed
before the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF).
✓ The IEPF authority shall initiate any action against a depository or participant or registrar
to an issue and share transfer agent after prior consultation with the SEBI.
Section 40 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions in respect of securities which are to be dealt with in
recognised stock exchanges.
→ Every company, making public offer, shall before making such offer, make an application to
one or more recognised stock exchange and obtain permission for the securities to be dealt
with in such stock exchanges.
→ The prospectus shall state the names of the stock exchange in which securities shall be
dealt with.
→ Default in compliance:
➢ Company: Fine- minimum Rs. 5 lakh and
Maximum Rs. 50 lakhs.
➢ Defaulting officer:
o Fine of minimum Rs. 50,000/- and maximum Rs. 3 lakh, or
A company my pay commission to any person in connection with the subscription to its securities.
→ Authorized by AOA.
→ May be paid out of proceeds of issue or out of profits of the company or both.
→ Disclosure in prospectus:
Underwriting is the process
• The name of underwriters,
through which an individual or
• The rate and amount of commission payable
institution takes on financial risk
to the underwriters,
for a fee. In this case, such
• The number of securities which is to be
underwritten or subscribed by the institutions agree to take over
underwriter absolutely or conditionally. the un-subscribed portion of
securities offered to public to
→ No commission shall be paid to any underwriter on meet minimum subscription.
securities which are not offered to the public for
subscription.
→ A copy of the contract for payment of commission is delivered to the ROC at the time of
delivery of prospectus for registration.
Section 39 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions in respect of allotment of securities when there
is a public offer.
Allotment of securities
Amount stated in
Sum payable on application for Application money shall not be
prospectus as
the amount stated have been <5% or such other % or amount
minimum amount has
paid to & received by company as may be specified by SEBI
been subscribed
Return of allotment
Shall be filed by the company with the ROC within 30 days of allotment in Form PAS-3
Company and its officer in default shall be liable to a penalty of Rs. 1,000/- for each day
during which such default continues or Rs.1 lakh, whichever is less.
Note:
• As per the regulation 45(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and
Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 201827, the minimum subscription is 90% of the entire
issue.
• As per the regulation 47(4) of the 28Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and
Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018, the minimum sum payable on application per
specified security shall be at least twenty five percent of the issue price.
• Further, proviso to regulation 47(4) provides that in case of an offer for sale, the full issue price
for each specified security shall be payable at the time of application
a) A list of allottees stating their names, address, occupation, and number of securities allotted
and shall be certified by the signatory as being complete and correct as per records of the
company [Sub-rule (2)]
b) Where the securities are issued for consideration other than cash:
→ A copy of the contract duly stamped, pursuant to which the securities have been
allotted [Sub-rule (3)].
→ If such contract for issue of securities for consideration other than cash is not reduced
in writing, the company shall furnish complete particulars of contract stamped with
the same stamp duty as would have been payable if the contract had been reduced in
writing [Sub-rule (4)].
c) In case of issue of bonus shares, a copy of the resolution passed in the GM authorizing
the issue of such shares [Sub-rule (6)].
d) In case shares have been issued in pursuance of section 62(1)(c) (i.e., Preferential issue of
shares) by a company other than listed company whose equity shares or convertible
preference shares are listed on any recognized stock exchange,
→ the valuation report of registered valuer shall be attached along with PAS – 3 [Sub-
rule (7)].
MISSTATEMENT IN PROSPECTUS
A contract of shares in a company is a contract of Uberrimae fides (Latin), which means ‘utmost
good faith’. The legal doctrine of Uberrimae fides provides that all parties to contract must deal in
good faith, making a full declaration of all material facts. The intending purchasers of shares are
entitled to true and correct disclosures of all the facts in the prospectus.
Sections 34 and 35 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions relating to punishment in case of
misstatement in prospectus.
In the prospectus, it is stated that the company had regularly paid dividends, in actual, company has
been incurring substantial losses during all those years. Company used to write back some of the past
provisions to the credit of the profit and loss account. It was held that the prospectus did not disclose
the true picture of the company.
The prospectus of a manufacturing company contain, ‘the present value of turnover is £1million
sterling per annum,’ the statement was true only if production capacity is considered but untrue if it
meant the present production level (capacity in utilisation). It was held that, such a statement which
director knew may bear multiple meaning out of which any can be false to their knowledge, considered
to be furnishing of misleading statement
The fear of heavy liability and criminal sanctions have controlled the directors' tendency of "using
extravagant terms and flattering description". But if the prospectus contains a misleading or false
statement or omits to disclose a material fact which amounts to misrepresentation, the aggrieved
shareholder has the remedies. The law allows the following remedies for misrepresentation
Remedies for
Misrepresentation
in Prospectus
Against the
Against the
Against the persons
Company &
Company authorised to
others
issue prospectus
RIGHT OF RESCISSION
When to seek rescission? A person who has purchased shares from the company on the basis of the
prospectus containing untrue and misleading statement of material facts is entitled to apply to the
Effect of rescission
The agreement to take up shares is voidable at the option of the subscriber to the shares, it will remain
valid unless he actually rescinds it. If the court accepts his application for the repudiation of the
contract, company will remove his name from the register of members and return his money with
interest and other incidental cost.
Entitlement to compensation for any damages which he sustained through the nonfulfilment of the
contract arises under section 75 of the Indian Contract Act 1872.
a. Right to rescind allotment of shares will not be available to the subsequent purchasers of shares
from the market.
b. A subscriber to the Memorandum of Association cannot also seek any relief, as the company cannot
be considered to be in existence at the time when he appended his signatures to the Memorandum of
Association. He cannot be said to have been influenced by any statement in the prospectus.
When to evoke?
In the cases where mis- statement amounts to fraud, aggrieved investor also gets a right of action for
damages against the company. This right is available even after the company has gone into liquidation.
c. Person suffered the damages as consequences of acting upon such fraudulent misrepresentation.
Exception:
a) Immaterial Liability:
Exception:
Misstatement pay damages
-consent is withdrawn before issue of
b) Reasonable grounds for loss
prospectus+ it was issued without his
to believe that the caused
authority.
statment was -penalty u/s
-it was published without his knowledge, &
true/ommission was 36
necessary he published notice in newspaper on being
aware of it after issue.
-person relied on a competent expert's
statement included in prospectus & such
expert has not withdrawn the consent
before filing prospectus with RoC
Note
a. Loss from mis-statement is not essential, to held a person guilty under section 34.
b. Liability for offence under section 34, is strict liability, hence it is immaterial where the omission is
intentional or unintentional, in both case person will be held guilty under section 34 and liable for
punishment under section 447 of this Act.
Persons responsible for the issue of prospectus can also be held liable in an action for deceit, under
general law as provided by section 19 of the Indian Contract Act. This remedy shall be available even
where the remedy by way of rescission as against the company is lost either through latches or
negligence or even if the company goes into liquidation.
issued a fraudulent prospectus on behalf of a company. No shares were purchased by Peek at that
time. Several months afterwards, Peek purchased 2,000 shares of the company from the stock
exchange. He brought an action against the directors for deceit (on the basis of prospectus). Court
held, the directors were not liable as the shares were not purchased on the basis of prospectus.
Section 36 of the Companies Act, 2013 prescribes punishment for fraudulently inducing persons to invest
money.
Section 37 of the Companies Act, 2013 has paved way for class action.
✓ Normal suit or
✓ Class action suit [A group of parties having common grievance against another party, may file
a single case together. In such case, representative of such group may attend the hearings and
follow up with legal proceedings].
Sub-section 1 provides, any person shall be liable for punishment under section 447, if:
a. He makes or abets the making of an application in a fictitious name to a company for acquiring, or
subscribing for, its securities; or
b. He makes or abets the making of multiple applications in different names or different combinations
of his name or surname for acquiring or subscribing for its securities; or
c. otherwise induces, directly or indirectly a company to allot or register any transfer of any securities
to him or to any other person in a fictitious name.
Sub-section 2, provides that every company which issues a prospectus is required to reproduce
prominently the provisions of the sub- section (1) in the prospectus and every form of application
for securities.
Note:
A person who gets shares allotted in a fictitious name becomes liable as a shareholder. Thus, where
a person carried on business under an assumed name and took shares in that name, his trustee
in bankruptcy of the said person, could not avoid liability.
Sub-section 3 provides, where a person has been convicted under the section, the court may order
disgorgement of any gain made by such person. The order may also include seizure and disposal of
securities which may be found in his possession.
The amount received through disgorgement or disposal of securities under sub- section (3), is to be
credited to the Investor Education and Protection Fund. [Sub section (4)]
Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013 describes the punishment for fraud.
Meaning of fraud: The term fraud in relation to affairs of a company or a body corporate includes
Fine: Fine:
Fine: Upto Rs. 50 Minimum equal to Minimum equal to
lakhs, OR amount of fraud, amount of fraud,
Maximum: 3 times Maximum: 3 times
the amount of the amount of
fraud, AND fraud, AND
Imprisonment
upto 5 years, OR
Imprisonment: Imprisonment:
Minimum 6 Minimum 3 years
months
Maximum 10
Both fine and Maximum 10 years
imprisonment years
1. A global depository receipt is a general name for a depository receipt where a certificate issued
by a depository bank, which purchases shares of foreign companies, creates a security on a
local exchange backed by those shares.
2. GDR as per section 2(44) of this Act means any instrument in the form of a depository receipt,
by whatever name called , created by a foreign depository outside India & authorized by a
company making an issue of such depository receipts.
3. Section 41 provides, company may issue depository receipts in any foreign country after
passing a special resolution in its general meeting and subject to such conditions as may be
prescribed in the Companies (Issue of Global Depository Receipts) Rules, 2014 (as further
amended in 2020).
MANNER AND FORM OF DEPOSITORY RECEIPTS
1. The depository receipts can be issued by way of public offering or private placement or in any
other manner prevalent in the concerned jurisdiction and may be listed or traded on the listing
or trading platform in the concerned jurisdiction.
2. The depository receipts may be issued against issue of new shares or may be sponsored
against shares held by shareholders of the company in accordance with such conditions as the
Central Government or Reserve Bank of India may prescribe or specify from time to time.
1. A holder of depository receipts may become a member of the company and shall be entitled
to vote as such only on conversion of the depository receipts into underlying shares after
following the procedure provided in the Scheme and the provisions of this Act.
2. Until the conversion of depository receipts, the overseas depository shall be entitled to
vote on behalf of the holders of depository receipts in accordance with the provisions of the
agreement entered into between the depository, holders of depository receipts and the
company in this regard.
PRIVATE PLACEMENT
Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 14 of Companies (PAS) Rules, 2014 provides the provisions
which are applicable when shares are issued on private placement basis.
Private placement means any offer or invitation to subscribe or issue of securities to a select
group of persons by a company (other than by way of public offer) through private placement offer-
cum-application.
b) Number of such identified persons shall not exceed 200 in a financial year. [Rule 14(2) of PAS
Rules, 2014]
e) As per Explanation given in Rule, it is clarified that the restriction of 200 shall apply individually for
each kind of security that is equity share, preference share or debenture.
→ In the explanatory statement annexed to the notice for shareholders' approval, following disclosure
shall be made:-
g) The private placement offer-cum-application letter shall be in Form PAS-4 serially numbered
and addressed specifically to the person to whom the offer is made. [Rule 14(4)]. It shall be issued
only after resolution has been filed in the Registry. [Rule 14(8)]
h) A complete record of private placement offers shall be maintained by the company in Form PAS-
5. [Rule 14(3)]
i) No public advertisement shall be made to inform the public about such an issue.
→ Every identified person willing to subscribe to the private placement issue shall apply in the private
placement and application issued.
→ Along with the subscription money paid either by cheque, or DD, or other banking channel (not by
cash).
→ The payment shall be made from the bank account of the person subscribing and the company
shall keep the record of the bank account from where such payment for subscription has been
received.
→ In case of joint holders, the money shall be paid from the bank account of the person whose name
appears first in the subscription.
→ The monies received on an application shall be kept in a separate bank account in a scheduled
bank and shall be used only for adjustment against allotment or for repayment of money where it
is unable to allot the securities.
✓ the allotment w.r.t any offer/ invitation made earlier have been completed, or
✓ that offer or invitation has been withdrawn or abandoned by the company.
→ If the company is unable to allot the securities within that period, it shall repay the money within
15 days from the expiry of 60 days, and
→ If the company fails to repay the money within that period, it shall be liable for interest at 12%
p.a. from the expiry of 60 days.
A return of allotment in Form PAS-3 shall be filed by the company with the ROC within 15 days
from the date of allotment including a complete list of allottees, their address, number of securities
allotted, date of allotment, nominal value and amount paid on such securities, particulars of
consideration, etc.
If the company defaults in filing the return of allotment within the above period, the company, its
promoters and directors shall be liable to a penalty of
→ Rs. 1,000 for each default for each day during which the default continues
→ Subject to a maximum of Rs. 25 lakhs.
Note
Proviso to Rule 4(1) states that when a company makes an offer or invitation to subscribe to
securities, no offer or invitation of any securities shall be made to a body corporate incorporated
in, or a national of, a country which shares a land border with India, unless such body corporate or
the national, as the case may be, have obtained Government approval under the FEMA29 Rules,
2019 and attached the same with the private placement offer cum application letter.
→ The company, its promoters and directors shall be liable for penalty
→ Which may extend to:
o amount raised through the private placement or
o Rs. 2 crores, whichever is lower
→ And the company shall also refund all monies with interest at 12% to the subscribers within 30
days of order imposing the penalty.
Any offer made without complying this section shall be ‘deemed public offer’ and relevant
provisions of this Act, SEBI Act, 1992 and SCRA 1956 shall apply.
Issue of Private
prospectus Types of placement
and other Securities Penalties
prospectus
related [Section 42]
matters
Misstatement
Public offer Shelf Securities to
in prospectus
and private prospectus be dealt with
placement in Stock [Section 34 &
[Section 31]
exchanges 35]
[Section 23]
[Section 40]
Deemed
Advertisement prospectus Punishment
of prospectus for fraud
[Section 25]
[Sectio 30] [Section 447]
Variation of
terms/ objects
in prosspectus
[Section 27]
Learning Outcomes –
Calls Alteration of
Types of share At premium share capital
capital [Section 49]
[Section 52] [Section 61]
[Section 43]
Calls in
advance Further issue
Certificate of At discount
shares [Section 50] of shares
[Section 53]
[Section 46] [Section 62]
Dividend in
proportion Sweat equity Issue of bonus
Voting Rights [Section 51] shares shares
[Section 47] [Section 54] [Section 63 &
64]
Variation of Preference
shares Reduction of
shareholders
share capital,
rights [Section 55] puchase of own
[Section 48] shares, buy-back
[Section 66,67, 68-
Transfer and 70]
transmission
of shares
[Section 56,
57,58, 59]
Shares represent ownership interest in a company whereas debentures represent the lenders’ interest
in the company.
Shares and Debentures are financial instruments which help in arranging funds for the company. The
legal provisions relating to Shares and Debentures are covered under Chapter IV of the Companies Act,
2013 (comprising Sections 43 to 72) and the Companies (Share Capital & Debentures) Rules, 2014 as
amended from time to time.
Section 43 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to the kinds of share capital.
2.1 Share
Section 2(84) defines ‘share’ as a share in the share capital of a company and includes a stock.
✓ The share capital of a company is divided into small units having a certain face value. Each
such unit is called a share.
✓ The definition of ‘share’ states that the term share includes ‘stock'.
✓ If a company undertakes to aggregate fully paid-up shares of various members as per
their requests and merge those shares into one fund, then such fund is called ‘stock’. Stock is
not issued originally but it is obtained by conversion of fully paid-up shares.
Case:
Around two decade later, J. Farwell in landmark case of Borland’s Trustee v Steel Brothers &
Co Ltd2 place his trust in the opinion stated above, and observe that share is the interest of
a shareholder in the company measured by a sum of money, for the purpose of liability in
the first place and of interest in the second, and also consists of a series of mutual
covenants entered into by all the shareholders inter se in accordance with the provisions of
the Companies Act and the Articles of Association.
Preference Share
Equity Share Capital
Capital
Section 43 states that, the share capital of a company limited by shares shall be of two kinds, namely:-
Equity share capital means all share capital which is not preference share capital.
Preference share capital means that part of the issued share capital of the company which carries or
would carry a preferential right with respect to-
Rule 4 of the Companies (Share Capital & Debentures) Rules, 2014 contains provisions which need to be
followed while issuing equity shares with differential voting rights.
(iii) The voting power of shares with differential rights shall not exceed 74% of the total
voting power, at any point of time,
(vii) Company has not been penalized by Court/Tribunal during the last 3 years of any
offence under the
→ RBI Act, 1934
→ SEBI Act, 1992
→ SCRA, 1956
→ FEMA, 1999 or
→ Any other Special Act, under which such company is regulated.
2.5.2 Other Provisions for issue of equity shares with differential rights
✓ Rule 4(2) – The explanatory statement to be annexed to the notice of the general meeting
or of a postal ballot shall contain various matters like particulars of the issue including its size,
details of differential rights etc.
✓ Rule 4(3) – Company shall not convert its existing equity share capital with voting rights
into equity share capital carrying differential voting rights.
✓ Rule 4(4) – The BOD shall, inter-alia, disclose the Inter-alia is a Latin
specified particulars in the Board’s Report for the F.Y. in phrase which means
which issue of equity shares with differential rights was
“among other things”.
completed.
✓ Rule 4(5) – Holders of equity shares with differential rights shall enjoy all other rights such
as bonus shares, right shares, etc., which the holders of equity shares are entitled to.
✓ Rule 4(6) – The Register of Members shall contain all the relevant particulars of the shares
issued with differential voting rights.
CERTIFICATE OF SHARES
Section 46 of the Companies Act, 2013 contain provisions which regulate the certificate of shares.
A certificate issued under the common seal, if any, of the company or signed by two directors or by a
director and the CS, if any, specifying the shares held by a person, shall be prima facie evidence of the
title of the person to such shares.
Where shares are held in depository form, the record of the depository shall be the prima facie
evidence of the interest of the beneficial owner.
a) Private company where the MOA or AOA so provides, provided such company has not defaulted
in filing its FS u/s 137 or Annual Return u/s 92 with the ROC.
b) Specified IFSC Company where MOA or AOA so provides.
Note:
1. Since w.e.f. 29-05-2015 though Companies Amendment Act 2015, requirement to have common
seal is optional for companies, hence physical share certificate issued under sign of two director
or of one director along with company secretary is valid.
2. If the composition of the Board permits of it, at least one of the aforesaid two directors shall be
a person other than the managing or whole-time director
A case wherein originally issued share certificate has been defaced, mutilated or torn, a
renewed share certificate in replacement shall be issued, in lieu of surrenderof such
original certificate, to the company.
Note:
1. A company may replace all the existing certificates by new certificates upon sub-division or
consolidation of shares or merger or demerger or any reconstitution without requiring old
certificates to be surrendered
2. On renewed certificate it shall be stated that it is “Issued in lieu of share certificate No sub-
divided/replaced/on consolidation”
3. Company may charge such a fee as board may think fit, but not exceeding
` 50 per certificate; and no fee shall be payable pursuant to scheme of arrangement
sanctioned by the High Court or Central Government.
A case wherein share certificate originally issue has been lost or destroyed, a share
certificate in duplicate may be issued if board is consented for the same basedupon
evidences produced.
Record of renewed and duplicate certificate to be maintained
Sub-section 3 overrule the articles of a company, and say the issue of a certificateof
shares or the duplicate thereof, the particulars to be entered in the register of members
and other matters shall be in manner and form as prescribed in rule 5, 6, and 7 of the
Companies (Shares and Debentures) Rules, 2014.
Rule 5 of the Companies (Shares and Debentures) Rules, 2014 applies, where shares are not
in demat form
Share certificate is in vogue in case of shares which are held in the physical form, not
in the demat form (under the depository mode). Hence provisions contained in rule 5 of the
Companies (Shares and Debentures) Rules, 2014 pertaining to share certificate applicable
where shares are not in demat form.
3.1.2 Punishment for issuing duplicate certificate of shares with intent to defraud
Company:
Officer in default
Fine
Minimum: 5 times
Liable for action
the face value of
u/s 447
shares involved
✓ Listed shares are required to be held in electronic At present, there are two
form (i.e., dematerialised form) depositories in India, i.e.,
✓ Rule 9A of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment • National Securities
of Securities) Rules, 2014, requires every unlisted Depository Ltd. (NSDL) ,
public company to issue the securities in and
dematerialised form and facilitate the • Central Securities
dematerialisation of all its existing securities.
Depository (India) Ltd.
(CSDL)
VOTING RIGHTS
Section 47 of the Companies Act, 2013 governs the voting rights of the members of a company.
The proportion of the voting rights of equity shareholders to the voting rights of preference
shareholders shall be in the same proportion as the paid-up capital in respect of the equity shares bears
to the paid-up capital in respect of the preference shares.
Where a share capital of the company is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to
the shares of any class may be varied.
Section 47 shall not apply to a private company, where MOA or AOA of the private company
so provides and which has not defaulted in filing its financial statements or annual return
with the Registrar.
Section 48 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the variation of shareholder’s rights.
• In writing of the holders of not less than 3/4th of the issued shares of that class, OR
• By means of a SR passed at a separate meeting of the holders of shares of that class.
• If the variation affects the rights of any other class of shareholders, the consent of 3/4 th of
such other class of shareholders is also to be obtained.
• Where holders of not less than 10% of the issued shares of a class did not consent to the
variation, they may apply to the Tribunal to have the variation cancelled.
• The application shall be made within 21 days after the date on which consent was given or
resolution was passed.
• The application may be made on behalf of all shareholders entitled to make an application
by any one or more person as they may appoint in writing for this purpose
• Where such application has been made, the variation shall not have effect unless and until
it is confirmed by the Tribunal.
• The decision of the Tribunal shall be binding on the shareholders.
• Within 30 days of order of the Tribunal, company shall file a copy thereof with the
Registrar.
Section 49, 50 & 51 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with making calls in respect of partly paid-up shares,
call-in-advance and all the matters incidental thereto.
When the shares are partly paid up, the company issuing them can make calls asking the shareholders
to pay the amount ‘called up’ in respect of such partly paid-up shares.
The company is permitted to pay dividends in proportion to the amount paid-up on each share, if
authorised by the AOA.
Section 52 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the provisions relating to issue of shares at a premium and the
application of such premium.
7.1 Premium
When a company issues shares at a price higher than their face value, the shares are said to be
issued at premium, and the differential amount is termed as premium
The aggregate amount of premium received shall be transferred to an account called “Securities
premium Account”.
Example: A share having face value of ₹10 is issued at ₹14. The amount over and above ₹ 10 is called
premium (i.e., ₹4).
Issue of fully
paid bonus
shares
Writing off the
Buy back of preliminary
shares u/s 68 expenses
Application
of Securities
premium
Account
Providing for Writing of the
premium payable expenses of, or the
on redemption of commission paid or
prference shares or discount allowed on,
debenture issue of shares or
debentures.
b. The amount of premium so received, whether in cash or kind, shall be carried to a separate
account to be known as the Securities Premium Account.
c. The amount to the credit of share premium account has to be maintained with the same
sanctity as paid-up share capital
d. It can be reduced only in the manner of paid-up share capital can be reduced under this act.
Section 53 of the Companies Act, 2013 prohibits the issue of shares at discount.
8.1 Discount
Where the issue price is lower than the face value of shares, such issue of shares is regarded as being
at discount and the differential amount is known as discount.
Example: A share having face value of ₹5 is issued at a lower price of ₹4. The differential amount of ₹1
is known as discount.
✓ A company shall not issue shares at a discount, except as provided in Section 54 (i.e.,
Sweat equity Shares).
✓ Any share issued by a company at a discount shall be void.
✓ Exception: A company may issue shares at a discount to its creditors when its debt is
converted into shares under any statutory resolution plan/ debt restructuring scheme as per RBI.
1) Fine: Company and every officer in default shall be liable to penalty which may extend to
2) Company shall also refund all monies received with interest at 12% p.a. from the date
of issue of such shares to the persons to whom such shares have been issued
Restrictions mentioned in Section 52 & 53 apply only in respect of issue of shares but not to the
issue of debt related products like bonds/ debentures.
Section 54 of the Companies Act, 2013 mention the provisions to be adhered to by a company issuing sweat
equity shares
9.3 Important provisions contained in Rule 8 of the Companies (Share and Debentures) Rules,
2014
✓ The SR authorising the issue of Sweat Equity shares shall be valid only for 12 months from
the date of passing [Rule 8 (3)].
✓ The valuation of intellectual property rights or of know how or value additions for
which sweat equity shares are to be issued shall be carried out by a registered valuer. A
proper report giving justification for such valuation shall also be given to the BOD by such
valuer [Rule 8(7)].
✓ Treatment of non-cash consideration: Where the sweat equity shares are issued for non-
cash consideration, the treatment of such non-cash consideration shall be as follows:
→ Where non-cash consideration is a depreciable asset – presented in the Balance sheet
in accordance with the Accounting standards.
→ Other items – expensed as provided in the Accounting standards. [Rule 8(9)].
✓ Disclosure in the Director’s Report: The BOD shall, inter-alia, disclose in the Director’s
Report for the year in which such shares are issued, the specified details of issue of sweat
equity shares [Rule 8(13)].
✓ Maintenance of Register: Company shall maintain a register of sweat equity shares in Form
SH 3 at the registered office of the company or such other place as BOD may decide in this
behalf [Rule 8(14)].
Section 55 of the Companies Act, 2013 along with Rule 9 of the Companies (Share Capital and
Debentures) Rules, 2014. contains the provisions for regulation of issue & redemption of
preference shares.
Non-participatory
(i) Authorised by passing a SR in the general meeting of the company [Rule 9(1)].
(ii) Company should not have subsisting default in the redemption of preference shares
issued earlier or in payment of dividend thereof [Rule 9(1)].
(iii) Register of members shall contain the particulars in respect of such preference shareholders
[Rule 9(4)].
Exception: For Infrastructure projects as specified in Schedule VI, preference shares can be
issued for a period exceeding 20 years but not exceeding 30 years subject to the redemption of
10% of such preference shares beginning in 21st year onwards or earlier, on a proportionate basis, at
the option of such preference shareholders.
• Premium payable on redemption shall be provided for out of the profits of the
company or out of the company's securities premium account, before such shares
are redeemed.
→ It may issue further redeemable preference shares equal to the amount due, including
dividend thereon and
→ On such issue of further redeemable preference shares, such unredeemed preference
shares shall be deemed to have been redeemed.
→ Conditions:
o Consent of holders of 3/4th in value of such preference shares
o Approval of Tribunal.
o Tribunal may pass order to redeem shares of dissenting shareholders.
Section 56 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the transfer and transmission of securities or
interest of a member of the company.
✓ A company shall not register the transfer of securities of the company, unless a proper
instrument of transfer in Form SH-4,
→ duly stamped, dated, and executed by or on behalf of the transferor and the transferee,
→ specifying the name, address, and occupation of the transferee
→ has been delivered to the company by the transferor or the transferee within 60 days
from the date of execution,
→ along with the certificate of securities or the letter of allotment of securities.
✓ Exception: Where the transfer is between persons both of whose names are entered as holders
of beneficial interest in the records of a depository.
Instrument Lost
Signed by Name, With share
of transfer in Delivered instument/
transferor address and certificate/
Form SH-4, within 60 delayed
and occupation of letter of
dated and days delivery- give
transferee transferee allotment
stamped indeminity
A company shall register an intimation of transmission of any right to securities, received by it,
from any person to whom such right has been transmitted.
Where an application for transfer of partly paid shares is made by the transferor,
The transfer of any securities or interest of a deceased person in a company by the legal representative
shall be valid as if he had been the holder at the time of execution of the instrument of transfer.
Forged transfer takes place when a company effects the transfer of shares on the basis of an instrument
of transfer containing forged signatures of the transferor.
However, if the transferee of the ‘forged transfer’ transfers the shares to another buyer who does not
know about the forgery and the company also registers the transfer in the name of the new buyer and
endorses the share certificates,
→ The company cannot deny the ownership rights of the new genuine buyer but
→ It cannot also deny the ownership rights of the original shareholder as forged transfer is
void-ab-initio, and therefore the company has to restore his name.
→ Hence, the company shall compensate the new genuine buyer who exercised good faith
in purchasing the shares.
→ The company shall get itself indemnified by the first transferee who used the forged
instrument to get the shares transferred to his name.
Section 57 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions relating to punishment for personation of a
shareholder.
If
any person deceitfully personates –
✓ Imprisonment – not less than 1 year but may extend to 3 years, and
✓ Fine – not less than ₹1 lakhs but which may extend to ₹5 lakhs.
Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains procedures to be followed by a company while refusing to
register the transfer of securities and the process for filing appeal against such refusal.
→ The company shall send a notice of refusal to the transferor and the transferee or to the
person giving intimation of such transfer, within 30 days from the date on which the
instrument of transfer, or the intimation of such transmission, was delivered to the company.
13.2 Public Company refuses to register transfer/ transmission of securities without sufficient
cause
The securities or other interest of any member in a public company are freely transferrable.
If a public company refuses without sufficient cause to register transfer/ transmission of securities
within a period of 30 days from the date on which the instrument of transfer/ intimation of transmission
was delivered to the company, the transferee may appeal to the Tribunal –
→ Imprisonment: for not less than 1 year which may extend to 3 years, and
→ Fine: not less than ₹1 lakhs which may extend to ₹5 lakhs.
Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the procedure for rectification of register of members.
Then appeal can be made to the Tribunal, or to a competent court outside India, in
respect of foreign members or debenture holders residing outside India, by
A limited company having a share capital may alter its MOA in its general meeting to:
Section 61 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides provisions for alteration of capital clause of the
MOA.
The company shall within 30 days of alteration of share capital, give a notice to the
Registrar in Form SH-7 along with the altered MOA.
Section 62 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with further issue of share capital.
✓ Rights issue,
✓ Employee Stock Options, or
✓ Preferential allotment
A right issue involves pre-emptive subscription rights to buy additional securities in a
company offered to existing shareholders.
If a company announces ‘1:10 rights issue’, it means an existing shareholder can buy one extra share
for every 10 shares held by him/her. Usually, right shares are issued at less than the prevailing
market price to encourage subscription.
→ the option given to the directors, officers or employees of a company or of its holding
company or subsidiary company or companies, if any,
→ which gives such directors, officers or employees, the benefit or right to purchase or to
subscribe for, the shares of the company at a future date at a pre-determined price
[Section 2 (37)].
Preferential allotment means issue of shares or other securities by a company to any selected
person or group of persons, whether or not those persons include existing shareholders or employees,
on a preferential basis.
→ Thus, company is authorised to issue to persons other than its existing shareholders
and to employees under ESOP. The issue of those shares is covered u/s 42 of the Act
(Private Placement).
#
The notice shall be dispatched through registered post/ speed post/through electronic mode/
courier/ any other mode having proof of delivery to all the existing shareholders at least 3 days
before the opening of the issue.
*As per Rule 12A time period within which offer shall be made for acceptance shall be not less than
seven days from date of offer.
Section 62 shall not apply to conversion of Convertible Preference shares/ Debentures into shares.
16.1 Conversion of Debentures issued by/ Loan obtained from the government
16.2 Conditions for issue of shares under ESOP Scheme [Rule 12]
In case of an unlisted company desirous to issue shares under ESOP Scheme to its directors, officers
or employees, Rule 12 requires certain conditions to be fulfilled.
Listed company while issuing shares under ESOP Scheme shall follow the provisions under
SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014.
(ii) Specified disclosures shall be made by company in the explanatory statement annexed to
the notice for passing SR [Rule 12 (2)].
(iii) The companies granting the ESOP will have the freedom to determine the exercise price
[Rule 12 (3)].
Section 63 of the Companies Act, 2013 prescribes the condition and the manner of issue of fully
paid-up bonus shares.
Free Reserves
Bonus shares may
be issued from
In other words, the undistributed profit of the company is retained by the company under the head of
capital against the issue of further shares to its shareholders. Bonus shares have, therefore, been
described as a distribution of capitalised undivided profit.
In the case of issue of bonus share there is an increase in the capital of the company by transferring of
an amount from its reserve to the capital account and thereby resulting in additional shares being
issued to the shareholders.
A bonus share is a property which comes into existence with an identity and value of its own and
capable of being bought and sold as such.
According to Section 63 (3), the bonus shares shall not be issued in lieu of dividend. But its
permissible for a company to capitalise its profits or reserves for the purpose of issuing bonus shares.
Section 64 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides provisions for notifying the Registrar in case of alteration of
Share capital.
Where a company alters its share capital as specified u/s 61 or 62, or redeems any redeemable
preference share, the company shall file a notice in Form SH-7 with the Registrar within 30 days of
such alteration/ redemption, along with an altered memorandum.
Upon default, the company and every officer in default shall be liable to a penalty of
Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the reduction of share capital.
(i) Applicable to company limited by shares or limited by guarantee and having share capital,
(ii) Prior confirmation by the Tribunal is required
(iii) Authorised by Special resolution
(iv) No reduction shall be made if the company is in arrears in repayment of any deposits
accepted by it or the interest payable thereon.
→ The Tribunal shall notify the CG, Registrar and SEBI, in case of listed companies, and the
creditors and also consider the representations made to it by these parties within 3
months within the date of receipt of the notice. If no representation is received within this
time, it shall be presumed that there is no objection to the reduction.
→ The Tribunal may make an order confirming the reduction of share capital if it is satisfied
that the debt or claim of every creditor of the company has been discharged or determined
or has been secured or his consent is obtained.
→ The Tribunal shall not sanction an application for reduction of share capital unless
• the accounting treatment, proposed by the company for such reduction is in
conformity with the accounting standards u/s 133 or any other provision of the Act,
and
• a certificate to that effect by the company’s auditor has been filed with the
Tribunal.
→ A certified copy of the order of the Tribunal and of the minute approved by the Tribunal
showing –
• The amount of share capital,
• The number of shares into which it is to be divided,
→ Order of the Tribunal confirming the reduction in share capital shall be published in
such manner as may be directed by the Tribunal.
No member of the company, past or present, shall be liable to any call or contribution in respect of
any share held by him, which exceeds the difference, if any, between –
a) The amount paid on the share, or reduced amount, if any, which is deemed to have been
paid thereon, and
b) The amount of the share as fixed by the order of reduction.
18.4 In case a creditor who was entitled to object has not been included in the list of Creditors
[Section 66 (8)]
Where the name of any creditor entitled to object to the reduction of capital is not entered into the list
of creditors by reason of his ignorance, and after such reduction, the company commits a default,
within the meaning of Section 6 of the Insolvency and bankruptcy Code, 2016 –
a) Every person who was a member of the company on the date of registration of the
order of reduction by the ROC, shall be liable to contribute to the payment of that
debt or claim, an amount not exceeding that which would have been liable to contribute if
the company had commenced winding up on the day immediately before the said date and
b) If the company is wound up, the Tribunal may, on an application made by any such
creditor and proof of his ignorance, if it thinks fit,
→ settle a list of person so liable to contribute and
→ make and enforce calls and orders on the contributories settled on the list, as if they
were ordinary contributories in a winding up.
Nothing contained in sub-section (8) shall affect the rights of the contributories among
themselves.
18.5 Punishment
Section 67 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the restrictions on purchase by the company of its own
shares.
✓ No.company having a share capital shall buy its own shares unless the consequent reduction
of share capital is effected under the provisions of this Act.
✓ A public company cannot, directly or indirectly, lend money/give financial assistance to any
person to purchase its own shares or the shares of its holding company.
Exceptions to this:
Note1:
1. In case the shares of the company are listed - Such purchase of shares shallbe made only
through a recognized stock exchange and not by way of private offers or arrangements.
2. Where shares of a company are not listed - the valuation at which shares are to be
purchased shall be made by a registered valuer.
3. The value of shares to be purchased or subscribed in the aggregate shallnot exceed
five percent of the aggregate of paid up capital and free reserves of the company;
4. Disclosures in respect of voting rights not exercised directly by the employees in respect
of shares to which the scheme relates shall be made in theBoard’s report for the relevant
financial year, namely:
(a) Names of the employees who have not exercised the voting rightsdirectly;
(b) Reasons for not voting directly;
(c) Name of the person who is exercising such voting rights;
(d) Number of shares held by or in favour of, such employees and the percentage of such
shares to the total paid up share capital of thecompany;
(e) Date of the general meeting in which such voting power was exercised;
Note2:
Section 67 sub section (1) shall not apply to Nidhi Companies, when shares are purchased by the
company from a member on his ceasing to be a depositor or borrower and it shall not be considered
as reduction of capital under Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. While complying with such
exception, the Nidhi Companies shall ensure that the interests of their shareholders are protected.
(Sub section 1 is No.company having a share capital shall buy its own shares unless the consequent
reduction of share capital is effected under the provisions of this Act)
Section 67 does not affect the right of a company to redeem any preference shares.
Section 68 to 70 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains the provisions for buy back of securities by
the issuer company.
A company may
purchase its own
shares/ specified
securities out of:
*
Specified securities includes ESOP or other securities as may be specified by the CG.
→ Buy-back is 25% or less of aggregate of paid up capital and free reserves of the company.
→ Maximum buy-back in a financial year shall not
exceed 25% of its total paid up equity capital in The expression “free
that F.Y. reserves” includes
The ratio of aggregate debts owed by the company after buy- securities premium
back is not more than twice the paid-up share capital and its free account.
reserves.
→
𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡𝑠(𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑢𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑑)𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑢𝑦𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘
𝑃𝑎𝑖𝑑 𝑢𝑝 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙+𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑠
≤2
→ All the shares/ specified securities for buy-back are fully paid up,
→ The buy-back of listed shares/ specified securities is in accordance with the regulations of
SEBI,
Open market
Whose
shares can
be purchased
under buy-
back
(2) The buy-back shall be completed within 12 months of passing the SR or a resolution
passed by the Board authorising the buy-back.
(3) Before making the buy-back, the company shall file with the ROC and SEBI (if listed
company),
• a declaration of solvency in Form SH-9 and
• verified by an affidavit to the effect that the Board has made a full enquiry of the
company and that the company is capable of meeting its liabilities and will not be
rendered insolvent within a period of 1 year from the date of declaration of
solvency.
• This declaration shall be signed by at least 2 directors, one of whom shall be the
MD, if any.
(4) The company shall extinguish and physically destroy the shares or securities so
bought-back within 7 days of the last date of completion of buy-back.
(5) After buy-back of shares, the company shall not make further issue of the same kind
of shares including allotment u/s 62 or specified securities within 6 months except-
• By way of bonus shares or
• In discharge of subsisting obligations such as conversion of warrants, stock option
schemes, sweat equity shares, or conversion of preference shares/ debenture into
equity shares.
(7) A company shall maintain a register of shares or securities bought back in Form SH-10.
The company before the buy-back of shares, file with the Registrar a letter ofoffer in Form No.
SH.8, along with the fee. The letter of offer shall be dispatchedto the shareholders or security holders
immediately after filing the same with the Registrar of Companies but not later than twenty days from
its filing with the Registrar of Companies.
The offer for buy-back shall remain open for a period of not less than fifteendays and not
exceeding thirty days from the date of dispatch of the letter of offer, but where all members of a
company agree, the offer for buy-back may remain open for a period less than fifteen days.
In case the number of shares or other specified securities offered by the shareholders or security
holders is more than the total number of shares or securities to be bought back by the company, the
acceptance per shareholder shall be on proportionate basis out of the total shares offered for being
bought back.
The company shall complete the verifications of the offers received within fifteen days from the
date of closure of the offer and the shares or other securities lodged shall be deemed to be accepted
unless a communication ofrejection is made within twenty one days from the date of closure of
the offer.
The company shall make payment within seven days of verification process and make
payment in cash to those shareholders or security holders whose securities have been accepted.
Company will return the share certificates to the shareholders or security holders whose
securities have not been accepted at all or the balance of securities in case of part acceptance
Where a company purchases its own shares out of free reserves or securities premium account,
then a sum equal to the nominal value of share so purchased shall be transferred to the CRR
and details of such transfer shall be disclosed in the balance sheet.
DEBENTURES
Section 71 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the manner in which a company may issue debentures.
22.1 Debenture
As per Section 2(30), debenture includes debenture stock, bonds or any other instrument of a
company evidencing a debt, whether constituting a charge on the assets of the company or not.
Debentures
Non-
Unsecured Irredeemable
convertible
*Secured debentures shall be issued in compliance with Rule 18 of Companies (Share Capital
and Debentures) Rules, 2014, which states that:
b) Following companies can issue debentures for a period exceeding 10 years but not
exceeding 30 years,
c) Shall be secured by creation of a charge on the properties or assets of the company/ its
subsidiaries/ its holding company/ associate companies. Such assets or properties shall be of
value which is sufficient for the due repayment of the amount of debentures and interest
thereon.
e) Within 60 days of allotment of debentures, company shall execute a debenture trust deed
in Form SH-12 to protect the interest of the debenture holders.
Where debentures are issued by a company, the company shall create a DRR out of the profits of the
company available for payment of dividend and the amount credited shall be utilised only for
redemption of debentures.
Type of Company Mode of Issue of Debenture How much DRR? Investment till 30th
April of each FY
All India Financial Public issue/ Private Placement N/A N/A
Institutions and Banking
Company
Other Financial Public issue/ Private Same as on NBFC N/A
Institution u/s 2(72) Placement (i.e., N/A)
Companies Act 2013
Listed companies. Public issue of debentures by N/A 15% of outstanding
except 1. (i) NBFC registered with RBI & Debenture **
(ii) Housing finance companies
registered with National
Housing Bank.
(iii) Other listed company
Or Private placement of N/A N/A
debentures by above
companies
No company shall issue a prospectus/make an offer or invitation to the public or its members exceeding
500, unless company has before issue/offer appointed one or more debenture trustees.
The company shall appoint debenture trustee u/s 71 (5), after complying with the following conditions
given in the rule:
→ The names of debenture trustee shall be stated in the letter of offer and in all subsequent
notices/other communications sent to debenture holders.
→ Before appointment, a written consent shall be obtained from such proposed debenture
trustees.
→ Casual vacancy in the office of the debenture trustee may be filled by the BOD. However,
while such vacancy continues, remaining trustee or trustees, if any, may act.
→ Where the casual vacancy is caused by the resignation of the debenture trustee, the
vacancy shall only be filled with the written consent of the majority of debenture holders.
→ Removal of debenture trustee from office before the expiry of his term – Only if it is
approved by the holders of not less than 3/4th in value of the debentures outstanding, at
their meeting.
A debenture trustee shall take steps to protect the interests of the debenture holders and redress
their grievances.
Convening of meetings of debenture holders to protect their interests [Rule 18 (4)]: The meeting
of all the debenture holders shall be convened by the debenture trustee on –
a) Requisition in writing signed by debenture holders having at least 1/10th in value of the
debentures for the time being outstanding.
b) The happening of any event which constitutes a breach, default or which affects the
interest of the debenture holders.
There shall be no provision in a trust deed for securing the issue of debenture trust deed, or in any
contract with the debenture holders, or in any contract with the debenture holders, which would have
the effect of exempting a trustee thereof from, or indemnifying him against, any liability for
breach of trust, where he fails to show the degree of care and due diligence required of him as a trustee.
Such a provision shall be void.
Also, the liability of the debenture trustee shall be subject to such exemptions as may be agreed upon
by a majority of debenture holders holding not less than 3/4th in value of the total debentures at
a meeting held for the purpose.
→ He can file a petition with the tribunal if he concludes that assets of the company are
insufficient to meet its debts.
A company shall pay interests and redeem the debentures in accordance with the terms and
conditions of their issue.
22.10 Filing of Petition before the Tribunal and order thereon [Section 71 (9)]
✓ The debenture trustee may file a petition before the Tribunal where at any time he concludes
that the assets of the company are insufficient or likely to be insufficient to discharge
the principal amount as and when it becomes due.
✓ The Tribunal may, after hearing the company and or any other person interested in the
matter, by an order, impose restrictions on the incurring of any further liabilities by the
company as considered necessary by the Tribunal.
Where a company fails to redeem the debentures on the date of their maturity or fails to pay
interest thereon when it is due, the Tribunal may,
A contact with the company to take up and pay for any debentures of the company may be
enforced by a decree for specific performance.
If a company having share capital makes an allotment of any debentures, a Return of Allotment
in Form PAS 3 shall be filed with the Registrar within 30 days of allotment.
Learning Outcomes –
INTRODUCTION
Deposits are an importance source of finance for companies. It is necessary to control the companies
which invite deposits to safeguard the general and wider interest of all those persons who offer deposits
out of their hard-earned money.
The statutory provisions as contained in Chapter V (Section 73 to 76A) of the Companies Act, 2013 and
the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 govern the acceptance of deposits and their
renewal.
DEPOSIT
→ Includes any receipt of money by way of deposit or loan or in any other form, by a company,
→ But does not include such categories of amount as may be prescribed in consultation with the
RBI.
Types of
Deposits
Secured Unsecured
Deposits Deposits
2.2 Features
(viii) Every deposit accepted by the company shall be repaid with interest.
(x) A private company can accept deposits from its members only.
(xi) A public company can accept deposits from its members and also from the public if it fulfills
certain parameters.
(1) Amount received from the Central government (CG) / State government (SG), or from any other
source whose repayment is guaranteed by the CG/SG, or from any local authority, or any amount
received from a statutory authority constituted under any Act,
(2) Any amount from foreign governments, foreign or international banks, multinational financial
institution, foreign governments owned development financial institutions, foreign export credit
agencies, foreign collaborators, foreign bodies corporate and foreign citizens, foreign authorities or
persons resident outside India subject to FEMA, 1999,
(3) any amount received as a loan or facility from any banking company or from State Bank of India
or its subsidiary banks or from a notified banking institution or a corresponding new bank or from
any co-operative bank,
(4) any amount received as a loan or financial assistance from Public Financial Institutions, any
regional financial institutions or insurance companies or any scheduled banks.
(5) any amount received against issue of commercial paper or any other instruments issued in
accordance with the guidelines or notification issued by the Reserve Bank of India;
(6) any amount received by a company from any other company. (Mainly known as Inter Company
Deposits (ICD))
(10) any amount received from an employee of the company not exceeding his annual salary
under a contract of employment with the company in the nature of non-interest bearing security
deposit;
(11) any non-interest bearing amount received or held in trust;
(12) any amount received in the course of, or for the purposes of, the business of the company–
(a) as an advance for the supply of goods or provision of services accounted for in any
manner whatsoever provided that such advance is appropriated against supply of
goods or provision of services within a period of 365 days from the date of acceptance
of such advance:
However, in case of any advance which is subject matter of any legal proceedings before
any court of law, the said time limit of three hundred and sixty five days shall not apply.
(b) as advance, accounted for in any manner whatsoever, received in connection with
consideration for an immovable property under an agreement or arrangement,
provided that such advance is adjusted against such property in accordance with the
However, it is clarified that if the amount received under items (a), (b) and (d) above becomes
refundable (with or without interest) due to the reasons that the company accepting the money does not
have necessary permission or approval, wherever required, to deal in the goods or properties or services
for which the money is taken, then the amount received shall be deemed to be a deposit on the expiry of
15 days from the date they become due for refund under these rules.
(e) as an advance towards consideration for providing future services in the form of
a warranty or maintenance contract as per written agreement or arrangement, if
the period for providing such services does not exceed the period prevalent as per
common business practice or five years, from the date of acceptance of such service
whichever is less;
(f) as an advance received and as allowed by any sectoral regulator or in accordance
with directions of Central or State Government;
(13) any amount brought in by the promoters of the company by way of unsecured loan in
pursuance of the stipulation of any lending financial institution or a bank subject to the fulfilment of
following conditions:
(a) the loan is brought because of the stipulation imposed by the lending institutions on the
promoters to contribute such finance;
(b) the loan is provided by the promoters themselves or by their relatives or by both; and
(c) Such exemption shall be available only till the loans of financial institution or bank are
repaid and not thereafter.
(14) any amount accepted by a Nidhi company in accordance with the rules made under section 406
of the Act;
(15) any amount received by way of subscription in respect of a chit under the Chit Fund Act, 1982
(16) any amount received by the company under any collective investment scheme in compliance
with regulations framed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India;
DEPOSITOR
(a) Any member of the company who has made a deposit with the company in accordance with
section 73(2) of the Act, or
(b) Any person who has made a deposit with a public company in accordance with section 76 of
the Act.
ELIGIBLE COMPANY
As per Rule 2(1)(e), the term’Eligible Company’ means a public company as referred to in section 76(1),
having
An ordinary resolution is sufficient if an eligible company is accepting deposits within the limits
specified under section 180(1)(c).
Company
Private Public
Company Company
No company shall invite, accept or renew deposits from public unless it follows the manner
provided under this chapter (i.e., Chapter V of the Act).
• A banking company,
• A non-banking financial company (NBFC) as defined in the RBI Act, 1934,
• Any housing finance company (HFC) registered with the National Housing Bank, and
• Such other company as the CG may specify, after consultation with the RBI.
Other company
A banking
NBFC HFC as specified by
company
CG
A company may accept or renew deposits from its members subject to the following conditions:
(b) Circular is issued by the company to its members including therein a statement showing:
• The financial position of the company,
• The credit rating obtained,
• The total number of depositors and
• The amount due towards deposits in respect of any previous deposits accepted by
the company and
• Such other particulars in prescribed form and manner.
(c) The copy of the circular shall be filed with the Registrar 30 days before issue of the
circular.
(d) Deposit, on or before 30th April of each year, at least 20% of the amount of deposits
maturing during the following F.Y. and kept in a scheduled bank account to be called the
deposit repayment reserve account.
Such amount shall not at any time fall below 20% of the amount of deposits maturing during
the F.Y.
(e) Company certifies that it has not committed any default in repayment of deposits
accepted or payment of interest thereon. In case any default had occurred, the company
shall make good the default and 5 years had lapsed since the date of making good the
default.
(f) Company may provide security for the due repayment of the amount of deposit or the
interest thereon. In case company does not secures or only partially secures such deposits,
then the deposits shall be termed as “unsecured deposits”.
Example: Ray Pharmaceuticals Limited issued a Circular inviting ‘deposits’ from its
members on 14-02-2022. Its Annual General Meeting (AGM) was held on 07-09-2022.
Since, six months from the closure of FY 2021-22 end on 30-09-2022, the Circular remains
✓ Which accepts from its members monies not exceeding (paid up share capital + free reserves
+ securities premium account), or
✓ Which is a start-up, for 5 years from the date of its incorporation, or
✓ Which fulfils all of the following conditions:
• Not an associate or subsidiary company of any other company,
• Borrowings from such banks or financial institutions or body corporates is less than
twice the paid-up share capital or ₹ 50 crores, whichever is less, and
• Such company has not defaulted in repayment of such borrowings subsisting at the
time of accepting deposits.
However, these companies shall file the details of such deposits accepted to the Registrar in Form
DPT-3.
✓ In case a company fails to repay the deposit or part thereof or any interest thereon, the
depsoitor concerned may apply to the Tribunal for an order directing the company to pay the
sum due or for any loss or damage incurred by him due to such non-payment.
✓ The amount deposited in the Deposit Repayment Reserve Account shall be utilised only for
repayment of deposits.
✓ Exception: Specified IFSC Public Company and private company can accept deposits
from its members up to 100% of aggregate of Paid-up share capital+ Free reserves+
securities premium account.
Section 76 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 deals with
the acceptance of deposits from public by eligible companies.
Only ‘eligible companies’ are permitted to accept deposits from the public, in addition to their
members.
A special resolution shall be passed in the general meeting which shall be filed with the ROC before
making any invitation to the public for acceptance of deposits.
The eligible company shall be required to obtain the rating from a recognised credit rating agency at
least once in a year. The copy of the credit rating shall be sent to the ROC along with the Return of
deposits in Form DPT-3.
✓ Every company which accepts secured deposits from the public shall within 30 days, create
a charge on its assets.
✓ Charge shall be created only on tangible assets and not on intangible assets.
✓ The company shall appoint one or more trustees for creating security for depositors.
✓ A written consent shall be obtained from the trustees before their appointment and a
statement to this effect shall be given in the circular or advertisement.
✓ The company shall execute a trust deed in Form DPT-2 at least 7 days before issuing the
circular.
(a) on receipt of a requisition in writing signed by at least one-tenth of the depositors in value
for the time being outstanding;
(b) on the happening of any event, which constitutes a default or which, in the opinion of the
trustee for depositors, affects the interest of depositors.
Disqualification of Trustee
A person shall not be eligible to be appointed as the trustee if the person:
(a) Is a director, KMP or any other officer or an employee of the company/ its holding/
subsidiary/ associate company or a depositor in the company,
(b) Is indebted to the company/ its holding/ subsidiary/ associate company/ subsidiary of
such holding company,
(c) Has any material pecuniary relationship with the company,
(d) Has entered into any guarantee arrangement in respect of principal debts secured by
the deposits or interest thereon,
(e) Is related to any person specified in (a) above.
Removal of Trustee
✓ No trustee for depositors shall be removed from office after the issue of circular or
advertisement and before the expiry of his term except with the consent of all the directors
present at a meeting of the Board.
✓ In case the company is required to have independent directors, at least one
independent director shall be present in such meeting of the Board.
Eligible company
Eligible government
From its members From persons other than company
members
✓ An eligible company intending to invite deposits is required to issue a circular in the form of
an advertisement in DPT-1.
✓ Such advertisement shall be published in English and vernacular language in an English
newspaper and vernacular newspaper having wide circulation in the state in which registered
office is located. It shall also be placed on the website of the company, if any.
✓ A copy of the circular duly signed by a majority of directors or their authorised representatives
shall be filed with the ROC for registration at least 30 days before the issue of
advertisement.
✓ The advertisement shall remain valid till the earliest of:
(a) up to 6 months from the closure of the F.Y. or
(b) the date on which FS are laid down before the company at the AGM.
(c) or in case no AGM has been held, the latest day on which AGM should have been held.
✓ A fresh advertisement shall be issued in each succeeding F.Y. for inviting deposits during
that F.Y.
✓ The company shall furnish a deposit receipt to the depositor or his agent within 21 days
receipt of money or realization of cheque or renewal.
✓ It shall be signed by the duly authorised officer.
✓ It shall state the date of deposit, the name and address of the depositor, the amount of
deposit, the rate of interest and maturity date.
Name, Address,
other relevant PAN of the Particulars of
particulars depositor guardian, in case
of minor
Security or particulars of
charge created nominee
instructions for
payment of date and amount
interest and TDS of each deposit
• The Register of Deposits shall be maintained in the registered office of the company.
Where the premature closure of a deposit is for the purpose of earning a higher rate of interest,
the higher interest shall be paid by the company only if the deposit is renewed for a period longer than
the unexpired period of deposit.
Non- applicability of
Rule 15
✓ The minimum tenure for which a deposit shall be accepted is 6 months and maximum period of
acceptance shall be 36 months.
Exception: A company may accept or renew deposits for repayment earlier than 6 months to meet
any short-term fund requirements, subject to the condition that:
Example : Continuing the example of Swapnil Traders Private Limited, it is assumed that
aggregate of its paid-up share capital, free reserves and securities premium account is `
2,00,00,000. In order to meet its short-term requirement of funds, it can raise deposits
maximum up to ` 20,00,000 (being 10% of ` 2,00,00,000) whose repayment tenure can be
less than six months; but such tenure cannot be less than three months. Therefore, Swapnil
Traders Private Limited must ensure that the short-term deposits so accepted are repaid
only on or after three months from the date of such deposits.
A duly audited return of deposits in DPT-3 shall be filed with the ROC along with fees on or before 30th
June of that year and declaration to that effect shall be submitted by the auditor in Form DPT-3.
In case a company fails to repay deposits on maturity, after they are claimed, it shall pay penal interest
of 18% for the overdue period.
If any company inviting deposits or any other person contravenes any of the ‘deposit rules’ for which
no punishment has been provided, the company and every officer-in-default shall be punishable as
under:
Section 76A of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the punishments for contravention of the provisions of
Section 73 or Section 76.
Section 74 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains the provisions regarding repayment of deposits accepted
before the commencement of this Act.
In case of a deposit accepted by a company before the commencement of this Act, the company
shall:
→ File with the ROC, within 3 months from the date of commencement or from the date on which
payments are due, a statement of all the deposits accepted by the company and sums remaining
unpaid and interest payable thereon along with the arrangements for repayment, and
→ Repay within 3 years from the date of commencement of this Act or on or before the expiry of
the period for which deposits were accepted, whichever is earlier.
The Tribunal may, on an application made by the company, allow further time as considered
reasonable to the company to repay the deposit.
As per Rule 18, If any question arises as to the applicability of these rules to a particular company, such
question shall be decided by the Central Government in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India.
Acceptance of Deposits
[Chapter V] & Companies (Acceptance of
Deposits) Rules, 2014
Learning Outcomes –
INTRODUCTION
Whenever a company borrows money by way of loans including term loans or working capital loans
from financial institutions or banks or any other persons, by offering its property or assets, a charge is
created on such property or assets in favour of the lender. Such a charge is compulsorily registrable.
The law relating to registration of charges has been dealt in Chapter VI of the Companies Act, 2013
consisting of sections 77 to 87 as well as the Companies (Registration of Charges) Rules, 2014.
1.1 Charge
Section 2(16) defines “charge” as an interest or lien created on the property or assets of a company
or any of its undertakings or both as security and includes a mortgage.
Movable Immovable
Property property
Example : Pearl Electronics Limited raised a term loan ` 10 lakh from Everest Commercial
Bank Limited, against the security of its office building. In this case, the company shall create
a charge on specific asset i.e. its office building and such charge shall be a fixed charge. The
company can sell this particular office building either by repaying the borrowed amount in
full or after seeking permission from the charge-holder i.e. lender bank.
Example: A retail showroom contains numerous articles for sale. The owner may borrow against the security
of all those goods. But he can still sell or deal with them in the ordinary course of business. The buyer of such
goods will get it free of charge.
Example: Prism Limited had taken a loan from ABC Bank, on the security of it stock. Now, in the event
of Prism Limited failing to repay the security interest or entering liquidation, the floating charge will
change to a fixed charge. Once a floating charge gets converted to a fixed charge, the stock can neither
be sold nor used by the company in its business operations.
Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions regarding registration of charges by the company
with the Registrar.
Regsitration of charges
By the company creating By the charge-holder By the purchaser
the charge [Section 77] [Section 78] [Section 79]
• It shall be the duty of the • In case the company • Where a company
company creating the creating a charge fails to purchased some property
charge, within or outside register the charge within in whose case a charge
India, on its property or the time limit, the person was already registered,
assets or any of its in whose favour the the company purchasing
undertakings, whether charge is created can get the property shall get the
tangible or otherwise and the charge registered. charge registered in its
situated in or outside name in place of seller in
India, to register the the records of the
particulars of the charge. Registrar.
Thus, the requirements of Rule 3 relating to Registration of Creation or Modification of Charge doesn’t apply
to above company.
✓ in Form CHG-1 or
✓ in Form CHG-9 (in case of debentures),
along with the copy of the instrument of charge, if any, creating the charge duly signed by the company
and the charge-holder shall be filed with the ROC within 30 days of creation of charge along with the
prescribed fees.
(a) under the seal, if any, of the under the hand of any
company, or director or CS of the
(b) under the hand of any director or company, or an authorised
CS of the company, or an authorised officer of the charge
officer of the charge holder, or holder
(c) under the hand of some person
other than the company who isintered
in the mortgage or charge.
→ Any charge required to be created or modified by a banking company under section 77 in favour
of the Reserve Bank of India
→ when any loan or advance has been made to it under sub-clause (d) of clause (4) of section 17 of
the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (2 of 1934)
*ad valorem fees means fees in proportion to the value of the charge.
→ The company shall make an application to the ROC in Form CHG-1 or CHG-9 (in case of
debentures) seeking for extension of time.
→ The application shall be supported by a declaration from the company signed by its CS or a
director that such belated filing shall not adversely affect the rights of any other intervening
creditors of the company.
→ The ROC, upon being satisfied that the company had sufficient cause for not filing the particulars of
charge and instrument of charge, if any, within 30 days, shall allow the extension of period.
• Upon due registration of a charge, the ROC shall issue a certificate of registration in Form
CHG-2. (Form CHG-3 for modification of charge)
• Such certificate shall be conclusive evidence that the requirements of this Chapter and
rules thereunder have been complied with.
Section 77 shall not apply to certain charges which are prescribed in consultation with RBI .
→ If a charge is created but the company primarily responsible for registering the charge
fails to do so within the prescribed preriod of 30 days, the charge-holder (i.e., person in
whose favour charge is created) may apply to the Registrar for registration of the charge along
with the instrument of charge within the prescribed time, form and manner.
Section 78 of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers the holder of charge to get the charge registered in case
the company creating the charge on its property fails to do so.
→ The ROC shall, upon receipt of the application from the charge holder, give a notice to the
company.
Section 79 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the provisions relating to acquisition of a property
already subject to charge and the modification of charge.
Where a property where charge is already registered is sold with the permission of the charge
holder, it shall be the duty of the company acquiring such property to get the charge registered in
accordance with section 77.
4.2 Modification of charge when there is change in terms and conditions etc.
Where there is any modification in the charge, it shall be registered by the company in accordance
with section 77 and the Registrar shall issue a certificate of modification of charge in Form CHG-3.
Examples of modification:
*A pari passu charge holder is entitled to a proportionate share in the mortgaged property. When this is ceded
a charge holder will become a second charge holder and his right of entitlement will be subject to full
satisfaction of the First charge holders claim.
REGISTER OF CHARGES
Section 81 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions regarding Register of Charges to be
kept by the Registrar.
Section 81 (1) states that the Registrar shall, in respect of every company, keep a register
containing particulars of the charges registered under Chapter VI in the prescribed form and
manner.
In addition, Rule 7 (1) states that the particulars of charges maintained on the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs portal (www.mca.gov.in/MCA21) shall be deemed tobe the register of
charges for the purposes of Section 81.
Inspection of Register: According to section 81 (2) such register shall be open to inspection by
any person on payment of such fees as may be prescribed for each inspection.
Similarly, Rule 7 (2) states that the Register shall be open to inspection by any person on
payment of fee.
Section 85 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions regarding Register ofCharges to
be kept by a company.
(i) According to section 85 (1):
• Every company shall keep a Register of Charges in the prescribed form17 and manner at
its registered office.
• The Register shall include all charges and floating charges affecting any property or assets
• A copy of the instrument creating the charge shall also be kept at the registered office along
with the Register of Charges.
(iii) Provisions of Rule 10 are as under:
• According to Rule 10 (1), the company shall enter in the Register particulars of all the charges
registered with the Registrar on any of its property, assets or undertakings and the particulars of
any propertyacquired subject to a charge as well as particulars of any modificationof a charge
and satisfaction of charge.
• According to Rule 10 (2), the entries in the Register shall be madeforthwith after the creation,
modification or satisfaction of charge, asthe case may be.
• According to Rule 10 (3), the entries in the Register shall beauthenticated by a director or the
secretary of the company or anyother person authorised by the Board for the purpose.
Inspection of Register of Charges and Instrument of Charges:
As regards inspection, section 85 (2) states that the register of charges and the instrument of
charges shall be open for inspection18 during business hours:
(a) by any member or creditor without any payment of fees; or
(b) by any other person on payment of prescribed fees. subject to suchreasonable restrictions
as the company may, by its articles, impose.
Preservation of Register:
According to Rule 10 (4) the register of charges shall be preserved permanentlyand the
instrument creating a charge or modification thereon shall be preservedfor a period of eight
years from the date of satisfaction of charge.
Section 80 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that the registration of charge shall act as a constructive
notice.
Section 82 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the requirement to intimate the Registrar of satisfaction
any registered charges.
• If any cause is shown:- ROC shall register a note to that effect in the Register of charges
and inform the company.
✓ The instrument creating a charge/ modification shall be preserved for 8 years from the date of
satisfaction of charge by the company.
POWER OF THE REGISTRAR TO MAKE ENTRIES OF SATISFACTION AND RELEASE IN THE ABSENCE OF
INTIMATION FROM COMPANY
Section 83 of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers the ROC to make entries with respect to satisfaction
and release of charges even if no intimation has been received from the company.
If the company hasnot informed the satisfaction of charge to the ROC & ROC receives evidence of
satisfaction of charge from other source, then,
Section 86 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the punishments for the company and officer
in default in case of contravention of the provisions relating to registration of charges.
Section 87 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 12 empowers the CG to order rectification of Register of
Charges.
a) Omission in giving intimation to the ROC w.r.t. payment or satisfaction of charges within
specified time,
b) Omission or misstatement of any particulars in any filing previously made to the ROC
relating to any charge or related matters.
Where such default is made, the company or any interested person shall make an application to the
CG in Form CHG-8.
Before making an order for rectification, the CG needs to be satisfied that such default was
• accidental or
• due to inadvertence or
• because of some other sufficient cause or
• it did not prejudice the position of the creditors/ shareholders.
OVERVIEW
[Section 78]
Acquisition of property subject to charge and modification of
charge
[Chapter VI]
[Section 79]
Registration of charge to act as constructive notice
[Section 80]
Satisfaction of charge
[Section 82 & 83]
Learning Outcomes –
• State the meaning, need and importance of management & administration of company.
• Learn about the maintenance of registers and other documentation required to be kept by a
company.
• Know about meeting for conduct of the business.
• Explain the requirements for convening of a valid meeting.
INTRODUCTION
The provisions relating to management and admisnistration of companies have been dealt with under
Chapter VII of the Companies Act, 2013 [Section 88 to 122] and the Companies (Management &
Administration) Rules, 2014.
This Chapter applies to all companies, public and private, and has special provisions applicable to One
Person Company (OPC).
Section 88 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions regarding maintenance of registers of members,
debenture holders and other security holders.
✓ Every company shall keep and maintain the register of members, debenture holders and other
security holders.
✓ Form of Register :
✓ Entries have to made in the Register within 7 days of the date of approval by the Board or
Committee thereof, the allotment/transfer of shares, debentures, or any other securities.
Rule 5 contains certain requirements which are applicable to all types of registers (i.e. Register
of Members, Register of Debenture-holders and Register of any Other Security Holders).
These are stated as under:
As per Rule 5 (1), entries have to be made in the Register within 7 days of the date of
approval by the Board or Committee thereof by approving the allotment or transfer of
shares, debentures or any other securities, as the case may be.
Place of maintaining Register
According to Rule 5 (2), the registers shall be maintained at the registered office of the company
unless a special resolution is passed ina general meeting authorising the keeping of the
register at any other place within the city, town or village in which the registered office is
situated or any other place in India in which more than 1/10th of thetotal members
entered in the register of members reside.
Other information also to be referred in register
1. In terms of Rule 5 (6), if any order is passed by any judicial or revenue authority or by Security
and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) or competent authority attaching the shares, debentures
or other securities and giving directions for remittance of dividend or interest, the necessary
reference of such order shall be indicated in the respective register.
2. According to Rule 5 (7), in case of companies whose securitiesare listed on a stock exchange
in or outside India, the particulars of any pledge, charge, lien or hypothecation created by the
promoters in respect of any securities of the company held bythe promoter including the
names of pledgee/pawnee and any revocation therein shall be entered in the register within
fifteendays from such an event.
3. According to Rule 5 (8), if promoters of any listed company, which has formed a joint venture
company with another company have pledged or hypothecated or created charge or lien in
respect of any security of the listed company in connection with such joint venture company,
the particulars ofsuch pledge, hypothecation, charge and lien shall be entered inthe register
members of the listed company within fifteen days from such an event.
Updating of change in status of members
Rule 5 (4) states that if any change occurs in the status of a member or debenture-holder or
any other security holder:
- whether due to death or insolvency or change of name or due to transfer to Investor Education
Protection Fund (IEPF) or due to any other reason entries thereof explaining the change shall
be made in the respective registers.
Rectification in register
According to Rule 5 (5), if any rectification is made in the register maintained under section 88 by
the company pursuant to any order passed by the competent authority under the Act, the
necessary reference of such order shall be indicated in the respective register
✓ Every register shall include an index of names included therein. Index is not required wherein
the number of members is less than 50.
✓ The register and index of beneficial owners maintained by a depository shall be deemed to
be corresponding register and index.
✓ The entries made in the registers and index shall be authenticated by the CS of the company or
any other person authorised by the Board for this purpose.
A company may, if so authorised by the AOA, keep in any country outside India, a part of the
register of members, or debenture holders, or other security holders, or of beneficial owners,
resident in that country. Such a register may be referred to as “Foreign Register”.
2.2.1 Conditions:
a) Within 30 days of opening the foreign register, file with the ROC notice of the situation of
the office in Form MGT-3.
b) In case of change in situation of such office or of its discontinuance, within 30 days file
a notice in Form MGT-3 with ROC of such change or discontinuance.
d) Inspection of foreign register, closing, taking extracts therefrom and copies thereof – same
manner as applicable to principal register. Exception: The advertisement before closing the
register shall be inserted in at least 2 newspapers circulating in the place wherein foreign
register is maintained.
g) The entries made in the foreign register shall be authenticated by the CS of the company
or any other person authorised by the Board by appending his signature to each entry.
The company and every officer in default shall be liable to penalty of ₹3L and ₹50,000 respectively.
Section 89 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions relating to declaration in respect of
beneficial interest in any share.
The duty of the company to pay dividend shall not be affected by this section.
- Section 89 shall not apply to a government company which has not committed a
default in filing its financial statements u/s 137 or Annual Return u/s 92 with the ROC.
- Central Government may, by notification, exempt any class (es) of persons from
complying with any of requirements of section 89, except sub-section (10), if it is
considered necessary to grant such exemption in public interest and any such exemption
may be granted either unconditionally or subject to such conditions as may be specified
in the notification.
Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013 states the requirement for every significant beneficial owner to state
his interest and other particulars to the company. MCA has issued Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners)
Rules, 2018 (SBO), which deals with identification and reporting in connection with SBO.
Has the right to An individual who, acting has the right to receive
exercise, or actually alone or together, or or participate in not less
exercises, significant through one or more than 10% of the total
influence or control, in persons or trust, distributable dividend, or
any manner other than posesses one or more of any other distributions,
through direct holdings following entitlements in in a FY through indirect
alone. the Reporting Company: holdings, or together
with direct holdings
holds indirectly, or together
with any direct holdings, not
less than 10% of voting rights
in the shares
The power to participate, directly or indirectly, in the financial and operating policy decisions
of the reporting company but is not control or joint control of those policies.
(1) To give notice in the Form BEN-4 to the person whom the company knows or has reasonable
cause to believe –
→ To be an SBO of the company,
→ To be having knowledge of the
identity of an SBO or another
person likely to have such Who have not registered
knowledge, or themselves with the
→ To have been an SBO of the company as SBO.
company at any time during (i.e., unregistered SBOs)
the 3 years immediately
preceding the date on which
notice is issued
(2) Maintain a register of SBOs in Form BEN-3 which shall be open for inspection during the
business hours on payment of such fee as may be prescribed by the company, but not
exceeding ₹ 50 for each inspection.
→ Where the person fails to give the company information required by the notice in Form
BEN-4 within 30 days or, the information given is not satisfactory, the company shall apply
to the Tribunal within 15 days of the expiry of the period specified in the notice.
→ The Tribunal may, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the parties concerned, make
such order restricting the rights attached with the shares within 60 days of receipt of
application or such other period as may be prescribed.
→ Any person aggrieved with the order of the tribunal may make an application to the
Tribunal for relaxation or lifting of the restrictions within 1 year from the date of such order.
→ If no such application has been filed within 1 year, such shares shall be transferred,
without any restrictions, to the Investors Education and Protection Fund (IEPF).
Every individual who becomes a SBO in the reporting company or whose significant beneficial
ownership undergoes any change, is required to file a declaration with the Reporting company in
Form BEN-1 within 30 days.
Officer in default
• Penalty – ₹25,000
• If the failure continues –Further
penalty of ₹200 for each day,
after first during which such
failure continues
Section 90 shall not be applicable to a Government Company which has not committed a default in filing
its FS u/s 137 or Annual Return u/s 92.
Section 91 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the closing of register of members, debenture holders
and other security holders.
✓ The register of members, debenture holders and other security holders may be closed by the
company by giving minimum 7 days’ notice period or such lesser period as specified by SEBI to its
members.
✓ Company closing the register shall give a minimum 7 days’ previous notice by an advertisement at
least once in an English & Vernacular language in English & vernacular newspaper respectively
having wide circulation in place where registered office is situated. It shall also be published on the
website notified by the CG and website of the company, if any.
o Listed company or company intending to get its securities listed to follow manner of giving 7
days’ notice as may be specified by SEBI
o Requirement of advertisement shall not applicable to private company provided that the
notice has been served on all members not less than seven days prior to closure of the
register
Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013 together with Rules 11 & 12 of Companies
(Management & Administration) Rules, 2014 provides the provisions with regard to Annual
Return.
Members and debenture holders along with the changes therein since the close of
the previous F.Y.
Promoters, directors, KMP, along with the changes therein since the close of the
previous F.Y.
Section 94 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions with regard to place of keeping the
registers and returns of a company and their inspection.
Registered office
Place of keeping
registers and returns
Can also be kept at
[Sec. 94(1)]
any other place in
Approval by Special
India in which more
Resolution
than 1/10th of the
total members reside
✓ The registers and returns shall be open for inspection during business hours, at such
reasonable time, on every working day as decided by the BOD,
→ By any member, debenture holder, other security holder or beneficial owner
without the payment of fee, and
→ By any other person on payment of fees as prescribed by the BOD but not exceeding
₹ 50/- for each inspection.
✓ Any member, debenture holder, other security holder or beneficial owner can
→ take extracts during business hours without payment of fee, and
→ also get copies on payment of fee not exceeding ₹ 10/- for each page.
7.3 Preservation of register of members etc. and annual return [Rule 15]
7.4 Penalty for refusing inspection or making any extract or copy required
✓ Company and every officer of the company in default shall be liable to a penalty of ₹
1,000/- for every day subject to a maximum of ₹ 1,00,000/- during which the default
continues.
✓ The CG may also direct an immediate inspection of the document or direct that required
extract be forthwith allowed to be taken by the person requiring it.
Section 95 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that the registers, indices, and copies of annual return shall
be a prima facie evidence of any matter directed or authorised to be inserted therein.
General meeting
(Meeting of
Board meeting Class meeting
company's
shareholders)
Meeting of a
Extra ordinary Meeting of Board special class of
Annual general
general meeting of Directors of the persons, like,
meeting (AGM)
(EGM) company creditors,
preference
shareholders, etc.
NOTICE OF A MEETING
Section 101 of the Companies Act, 2013 together with Rule 18 of the Companies (Management &
Administration) Rules, 2014 lays down the rules regulating the notice to be sent calling a meeting.
In case of Specified IFSC Public Company - Section 101 shall apply in case of a Specified IFSC public
company, unless otherwise specified in the articles of the company. [Notification No. GSR 8 (E), dated
4th January, 2017.]
In case of section 8 company, in clause (1) of Sub-section (1) of Section 101 for the words "21 days",
the words "14 days" shall be substituted. This exception shall be applicable to a section 8 company
which has not committed a default in filing its financial statements under section 137 or annual return
under section 92 with the Registrar. [Notification No. GSR 466 (E), 5-6-2015 as amended by Notification
No. GSR 584 (E), dated 13th June, 2017.
Where a notice for the GM is sent by post, it shall be deemed to be served at the expiration
of 48 hours after the letter containing the same is posted. [Rule 35(6) of the Companies
(Incorporation) Rules, 2014]
→ Any communication sent by a company through its authorised and secured computer
programme
→ which is capable of producing confirmation and keeping record of such communication
addressed to the email address provided by such member who is entitled to receive such
communication.
→ A notice may be sent through e-mail as a –
(a) Text, or
(b) As an attachment to e-mail, or
(c) As a notification providing electronic link, or
(d) URL for accessing such notice.
It is the duty of the company to prove that the omission was not deliberate.
A GM may be called at a shorter notice if consent in writing/ by electronic mode is given by:
(1) In case of AGM: not less than 95% of the members entitled to vote thereat.
(2) In case of other GM: by members of the company having
Section 102 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to explanatory statement to be
attached to a notice of a general meeting where any special business is to be transacted.
Where any special business is to be transacted at the company’s general meeting, then an
“explanatory statement” should be annexed to the notice calling such GM.
2) Any other information / facts that may enable the members to understand the meaning,
scope, and implications of the items of business and to take decision thereon.
3) If the special business relates to or affects any other company, then the extend of
shareholding in that other company of every promoter, director, manager and every other
KMP shall be disclosed, if the extend of shareholding is 2% or more of the paid-up capital of
that other company.
4) In case any business refers to any document to be considered at the meeting, then time
and place where such document can be inspected.
Ordinary Special
business business
2) If any default is made in complying with the provisions of this section, every promoter,
director, manager, or other KMP of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty
of
→ ₹ 50,000/- or
→ 5 times the benefit accruing to the promoter, director, manager, or other KMP or any of
his relatives
Whichever is higher.
Section 103 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the quorum for the meetings of the company.
Quorum = The minimum number of members who must be present in order to constitute a valid meeting.
If the number of
members exceed 5000
= 30 members personally
present.
Note: The AOA may provide for a larger number to be the quorum for meetings of the company.
a) Proxies
✓ If the quorum is not present within half -an-hour from the time appointed for the meeting
of the company –
a) The meeting shall stand adjourned to the same day in the next week at the same time
and place, or to such other date, time and place as the BOD may determine, or
b) If the meeting was called by requisitionists u/s 100, the meeting shall stand cancelled.
✓ In case of an adjourned meeting/ change of day, time or place of meeting , company shall give
not less than 3 days’ notice to the members –
• Either individually, or
• By publishing an advertisement in the newspapers (English & vernacular) having wide
circulation at the place where the registered office is situated.
✓ If quorum is not present in adjourned meeting also within half-an-hour, members present
shall form the quorum.
Note:
CHAIRMAN OF MEETINGS
Section 104 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to election of chairman
of the company and his powers.
The members personally present shall elect among themselves a person to be the
Chairman of the Company
by show of hands Unless AOA provides otherwise
Casting vote = In the event of the equality of vote on a particular business being transacted at the
meeting, the Chairman of the meeting shall have a right to cast a second vote. If there is no provision
for a casing vote in the AOA, an ordinary resolution on which there is equality of votes is deemed to be
dropped.
PROXIES
Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the appointment of proxy of a member of the
company.
Any member of a company who is entitled to attend and vote at a meeting of the company shall be
entitled to appoint another person as a proxy to attend and vote at the meeting on his behalf.
14.2 Applicability
✓ Every member entitled to vote at a meeting of the company, or on any resolution to be moved
thereat, shall be entitled to inspect the proxies.
✓ Time for inspection – during the period beginning 24 hours before the commencement of
meeting and ending with the conclusion of the meeting, at any time during the business
hours.
At least 3 days prior notice in writing of the intention so to inspect should be given to the company.
* Officer shall not be liable by reason only of issue to member at his request in writing of a form of
appointment naming the proxy, or of a list of persons willing to act as proxies, if the form or list is
available on request in writing to every member entitled to vote at the meeting by proxy
If an invitaton to
appoint as proxy any
• every officer of the company who issues
specified person is sent
invitation as aforesaid or authorises or
to any member of the
permits their issue shall be liable to
company entitled to
penalty of ₹50,000
attend and vote thereat
by proxy*
Section 106 of the Companies Act, 2013 overrules the whole of the Act and provides for
restriction on voting rights of a member.
AOA may provide that no member shall exercise any voting right in respect of any share
registered in his name
On a poll taken at a meeting, a member entitled to more than one vote, or his proxy, where allowed,
other another person entitled to vote for him, as the case may be, need not, if he votes
• Joint shareholders must vote in consensus unless the AOA provide otherwise.
• The voting in case of joint holders is done in the order of seniority, which is determined on
the basis of the order in which their names appear in the register of members. Joint holders
have a right to instruct the company as to the order in which their name appears in the register.
• Directors, who are also shareholders of the company stand in a fiduciary relationship with
the company in their capacity as directors.
• However, the director should vote as a common shareholder and need not be influenced
by the fact of his being a director.
Section 107 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the provisions relating to voting by show of
hands in a meeting of the company.
✓ Unless the voting is demanded by way of poll or by electronic means, the voting should be
done by way of hands in the first instance.
✓ The declaration by the Chairman of the meeting in the minutes books shall be conclusive
evidence that the resolution is passed.
✓ Even an insolvent shareholder can vote at the meeting by show of hands provided:
o He has no longer any beneficial interest in the shares and
Section 108 of the Companies Act, 2013, together with Rule 20 of the Companies (Management
& Administration) Rules, 2014 provides the procedure for electronic voting.
The notice of the meeting shall be sent to all the members, directors, and auditors of the company
Through electronic means, By The notice shall also be hosted on the website
By registered post
namely, registered e-mail ID courier of the company, if any, and of the agency
or speed post, or
of the recipient, or service. forthwith after it is sent to the members.
The process and manner Time schedule for The process and manner for generating
of voting by electronic casting votes by Login ID details or receiving the password and for
means remote e-voting casting of vote in a secure manner
immediately on completion of dispatch of notices, but atleast once in a vernacular newspaper and english
atleast 21 days before the date of GM newspaper having wide circulation
As per Rule 18 of the Companies (Management & Administration) Rules, 2014 , sending of notices through
electronic mode has been statutorily recognized. Accordingly, it is permitted for a company to give
notice through electronic mode.
The expression ‘‘electronic mode’’ shall mean any communication sent by a company through its
authorized and secured computer programme which is capable of producing confirmation and
keeping record of such communication addressed to the person entitled to receive such
communication at the last electronic mail address provided by the member.
◼ A notice may be sent through e-mail as a–
Text; or
As an attachment to e-mail; or
◼ Rule 18(3)
The e-mail shall be addressed to the person entitled to receive such e-mail as per the records of
the company as provided by the depository.
It is to be noted that the company shall provide an advanceopportunity at least once in a
financial year, to the member to registerhis e-mail address and the changes therein and such
request may be made by only those members who have not got their e-mail ID recorded or to
update a fresh e-mail ID and not from the members whose e-mail ids are already registered.
a. The subject line in e-mail shall state the name of the company, noticeof the type of meeting,
place and the date on which the meeting is scheduled.
b. If notice is sent in the form of a non-editable attachment to e-mail, such attachment shall be
in the Portable Document Format or in a non-editable format together with a ‘link or
instructions’ for recipient for downloading relevant version of the software.
c. The company’s obligation shall be satisfied when it transmits the e-mail and the company shall
not be held responsible for a failure in transmission beyond its control.
d. If a member entitled to receive notice fails to provide or update relevant e-mail address to the
company, or to the depository participant as the case may be, the company shall not be in
default for not delivering notice via e-mail.
e. The company may send e-mail through in-house facility or its registrar and transfer agent or
Scrutiniser shall maintain a register either manually or electronically to record the assent or
dissent received with details of member. Register and all other papers shall remain in the safe
custody of the scrutiniser until minutes are prepared.
Note:
Procedural aspect of Voting by E mode are covered in Rule 20. Rule 20(20) defines certain
terms as under :
‘cut-off date' means a date not earlier than seven days before the date of general meeting
for determining the eligibility to vote by electronic means or in the general meeting.
[Explanation II (ii) to Rule 20(2)]
remote e-voting' means the facility of casting votes by a member using an electronic
voting system from a place other than venue of general meeting. [Explanation II(v) to
Rule 20(2)]
✓ ‘secured system’ means computer hardware, software, and procedure that - (a) are
reasonably secure from unauthorised access and misuse; (b) provide a reasonable level
of reliability and correct operation; (c) are reasonably suited to performing the intended
functions; and (d) adhere to generally accepted security procedures; [Explanation II (vi)
to Rule 20(2)]
✓ 'voting by electronic mean' includes "remote e-voting and voting" at the general meeting
through an electronic voting system which may be the same as used for remote e-voting.
[Explanation II (vii) to Rule 20(2)
Section 109 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions for demand for voting through
poll.
Who can
demand
for poll
Section 110 of the Companies Act, 2013 r.w. Rule 22 of Companies (Management &
Administration) Rules, 2014 covers the provisions relating to passing of resolution by postal
ballot
✓ Items of business as CG may declare that can be transacted only by postal ballot.
✓ Any other item of business other than –
o Ordinary business and
o Any business in respect of which directors or auditors have a right to be heard at
the meeting.
giving loans,
extending Alteration of Alteration of AOA to
objects clause insert or remove
guarantee, provisionswhich are
providing of the MOA required to be
security in included in order to
excess of limits constitute a private
u/s 186 company
Sale of whole or
substantially Change
inregistered
whole of
office to outside
undertaking of
a company Items that can be the local limits
of any city,
transacted only by village or town
voting through a
postal ballot
change in
election of a [Rule 20] objects for
director which money
was raised
through
prospectus
OPC and other companies having members up to 200 are not required to transact any business
through postal ballot.
A member who is voting by way of postal ballot has votes in proportion to his share in the paid-up share
capital of the company and he need not use all his votes in the same way. Therefore, 4 types of ballots
may be received from the shareholders:
Section 111 of the Companies Act, 2013 gives the right to propose resolutions for consideration
at the general meetings.
• The number of members required to make a valid requisition under this section is the
same as required to requisition a general meeting u/s 100.
• The requisition must be made in writing.
• It should be signed –
o In case of company having share capital – by such number of members who hold, not
less than 1/10th of such paid up share capital of the company having right to vote.
o In case of company not having share capital – by such number of members who have
not less than 1/10th of the total voting power of all the members having right to vote.
• Time for requisition – the requisition shall be deposited at the registered office of the
company
o Requisition requiring notice of a resolution - not less than 6 weeks before the meeting.
o Other requisitions – not less than 2 weeks before the meeting.
• A reasonable sum must be deposited to meet the company’s expenses in giving effect to
proposing the resolution.
On receipt of a valid requisition u/s 111, the company shall give a notice to the members of any
resolution to be moved and circulate to members any statement with respect to the matters referred
to in proposed resolution/ business to be dealt with at the meeting.
The company is not duty bound to circulate the notice when the prerequisites are not complied with.
The company shall not be bound to circulate any statement if the CG, on an application received
either on behalf of the company or of any person who claims to be aggrieved, declares that the rights
conferred are being abused to secure needless publicity for defamatory matter.
The company and every officer in default shall be liable to a penalty of ₹ 25,000/-.
President of India or the Governor of a State if he is a member of a company, may appoint his
Section 112 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for the representation of president & governors
in companies in which they are member.
Any Body Corporates who are members/creditor of a company may appoint their representative
at any meeting by resolution of its directors or other governing body. Such Representative shall have
all rights
and Section 113 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for the representation of corporations meeting
powers of of companies and creditors.
member.
Such representative shall be
appointed by resolution of the board of directors or of the governing body of such corporation.
Section 114 of the Companies Act, 2013 defines an Ordinary and Special resolution.
Motion Resolution
Oral opinion or recommendation/ Actual votes in favour and against are cast
proposals of resolution to be passed. to adopt a motion.
Section 115 of the Companies Act, 2013 r.w. Rule 23 of Companies (Management &
Administration) Rules, 2014 deals with resolutions requiring special notice.
1) Special notice to be given to the company shall be signed, either individually or collectively by
such number of members
→ holding not less than 1% of the total voting power or
→ holding shares on which an aggregate sum of not less than ₹5,00,000/- has been paid
up.
3) The company shall immediately after receipt of notice, give its members notice of resolution
at least 7 days before the meeting.
4) Where company is unable to give such notice of special resolution, it shall publish the
notice in the newspaper (English & vernacular) at least 7 clear days before the meeting and
also be posted on the website, if any, of the company.
Section 116 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to resolutions passed at adjourned
meeting.
Where a resolution is passed at an adjourned meeting, the resolution shall be treated as passed on
the day it was actually passed and not on any earlier date.
Section 117 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to filing of resolutions and
agreements.
A copy of every resolution and an agreement in respect of matters specified therein together with an
explanatory statement shall be filed in Form MGT-14 with the ROC within 30 days of its passing and
the ROC shall register the same.
Any resolution/agreement that causes alteration of AOA shall be annexed to every copy of AOA.
Any
Unanimous resolution of
Any other
resolutions, BOD or
resolution
but which, if agreement Resolution
Resolution as may be
Special was not so executed of any class Resolution
for winding prescribed
Resolution agreed, relating to of share- u/s 179(3)*
up and placed
would have appointment holders
in public
required SR /
domain
to be passed reappointme
nt of MD
*Provided no person shall be entitled under section 399 to inspect or obtain copies of such resolutions.
Provided further that nothing shall apply in respect of a resolution passed to grant loans, or give
guarantee or provide security in respect of loans under section 179(3)(f) in the ordinary course of its
business by ,—
(b) any class of NBFC registered under Chapter IIIB of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, as may be
prescribed in consultation with the RBI;
(c) any class of HFC registered under the National Housing Bank Act, 1987, as may be prescribed in
consultation with the NHB;
MINUTES
→ Every company shall prepare, sign, and keep minutes of every general meeting, Board meeting or
of every committee of the Board,
Section 118 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to preparation and
maintenance of minutes of the meeting.
→ within 30 days of the conclusion of every such meeting, or passing of resolution by postal ballot
→ in books kept for that purpose with their pages consecutively numbered.
• Fair and correct summary of proceedings that took place at the concerned meeting.
• All appointments made at any of the meetings aforesaid.
• In case of Board meeting or meeting of committee of Board:
o The name of directors’ present
o For each resolution passed, names of directors dissenting from or not concurring
with the resolution.
• Following matters shall not be included: Any matter, which in the opinion of the
Chairman of the meeting –
o Is or could be defamatory to any person,
o Is irrelevant or immaterial to the proceedings,
o Is detrimental to the interests of the company.
• The matters to be included or excluded shall be at the absolute discretion of the
Chairman of the meeting.
Preservation of
minutes of GM shall be kept at the registered office of the company
•preserved permanently
•shall be kept in the custody of CS or any director duly authorised by the BOD
Preservation of
minutes of meetings shall be preserved permanently
of Board/ committee
•shall be kept in the custody of CS or any director duly authorised by the BOD
•shall be kept at the registered office or such other place as BOD may decide
This section shall not apply to Section 8 company except that minutes may be recorded within 30 days
in case of companies where AOA provide for confirmation of minutes by circulation.
Section 119 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to inspection of minutes book of
general meeting.
A copy of the minutes referred shall be liable to be furnished to the member, within 7 days after
the request was made in that behalf to the company, and on payment of such fees as prescribed.
Section 120 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to maintenance and
inspection of documents, record, register or minute in electronic form.
Provisions prescribed in Rules 27, 28 and 29 of the Companies (Management and Administration)
Rules, 2014 are relevant in this respect. Rule 30 states the penalty in case of contravention
Rule 27 of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014 states as under:
1. Every listed company or a company having at least 1000 shareholders, debenture-holders and
other security holders, may maintain its records, as required to be maintained under the Act
or rules made thereunder, in electronic form.
2. The records in electronic form shall be maintained in such manner as the Board of directors
may think fit:
Provided that -
(a) the records are maintained in the same formats and in accordance with all other
requirements as provided in the Act or the rules made thereunder;
(b) the information as required under the provisions of the Act or the rules made thereunder
should be adequately recorded for future reference;
(c) the records must be capable of being readable, retrievable and reproducible in printed form;
(d) the records are capable of being dated and signed digitally whereverit is required under
the provisions of the Act or the rules made thereunder;
(e) the records, once dated and signed digitally, shall not be capable of being edited or altered;
(f) the records shall be capable of being updated, according to the provisions of the Act or the
rules made thereunder, and the date of updating shall be capable of being recorded on every
updating.
The person who is responsible for the maintenance and security of electronic records
shall-
(a) provide adequate protection against unauthorized access, alteration or tampering of
records;
(b) ensure against loss of the records as a result of damage to, or failure of the media on which
the records are maintained;
(c) ensure that the signatory of electronic records does not repudiate the signed record as not
genuine;
(d) ensure that computer systems, software and hardware are adequately secured and
validated to ensure their accuracy, reliability and consistent intended performance;
(e) ensure that the computer systems can discern invalid and altered records;
(f) ensure that records are accurate, accessible, and capable of being reproduced for
reference later;
(g) ensure that the records are at all times capable of being retrieved to a readable and
printable form
(h) ensure that records are kept in a non-rewritable and non-erasable format like
pdf. version or some other version which cannot be altered or tampered;
(i) ensure that at least one backup, taken at a periodicity of not exceeding
oneday, are kept of the updated records kept in electronic form, every backup
is authenticated and dated and such backups shall be securely kept at such
places as may be decided by the Board;
(j) limit the access to the records to the managing director, company secretary
or any other director or officer or persons performing work of the company
as may be authorized by the Board in this behalf;
(k) ensure that any reproduction of non-electronic original records in electronic
form is complete, authentic, true and legible when retrieved;
(l) arrange and index the records in a way that permits easy location, access and
retrieval of any particular record; and
(m) take necessary steps to ensure security, integrity and confidentiality of records.
Inspection and copies of records maintained in electronic form:
Rule 29 states that the records maintained in electronic form shall be made available for
inspection by the company in electronic form. Copies of the records maintained in electronic
form, containing a clear reproduction of the whole or part thereof, shall be provided on
payment of not exceeding 10 per page.
General
Meetings
Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions relating to conducting Annual
general meeting of a company.
Section 97 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the power of Tribunal to call AGM in certain
circumstances.
Section 98 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the power of Tribunal to call the meeting of
members etc. in certain circumstances.
Section 99 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the punishment for contravention of the provisions of
sections 96 to 98, i.e., default in holding a meeting as AGM or on directions issued by the Tribunal.
Section 121 of the Companies Act, 2013 r.w. Rule 31 of the Companies (Management &
Administration) Rules, 2014 provides the provisions relating to preparation of report on AGM
and penalty for contravention.
Continuing failure - ₹ 500/- for each day after ₹ 500/- for each day after
further penalty the first during which failure the first during which
continues failure continues
Section 100 of the Companies Act, 2013 r.w. Rule 17 of the Companies (Management & Administration)
Rules, 2014 provides the provisions relating to extra ordinary general meetings.
3) By requisitionists –
The BOD does not proceed
to call a meeting within 21 The requisitionists
days of receipt of a valid themselves may call and hold
requisition on a day not later the meeting within 3 months
than 45 days from the date from the date of requistion
of receipt of requisition
Section 122 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the applicability of provisions of this chapter
(i.e., Chapter VII) to OPC.
Business required to In case of an OPC where there is only one director on the
be transacted at Board Board, it shall be sufficient if the resolution by such
Meeting director is entered in the minute book maintained u/s
118 and signed and dated by such director. Such date
shall be deemed to be the date of board meeting.
If any default is made in compliance with any of the provisions of this rule, the company and every
officer or such other person who is in default shall be punishable with fine which may extend to five
thousand rupees and where the contravention is a continuing one, with a further fine which may
extend to five hundred rupees for every day after the first during which such contravention continues.
[Rule 30]
Requisites of
Registers Annual Return Meetings convening a Resolutions
meeting
Sec 135 of Companies Act, 2013 lays down provisions requiring corporates to mandatorily spend a
prescribed % of their profits on certain specified areas of social upliftment in discharge of their social
responsibilities.
9.1 Constitution of CSR Committee [Section 135 (1) r.w. Companies (CSR) Rules, 2014]
#
Net worth, turnover or net profit of a foreign company shall be computed in accordance with balance
sheet and Profit and loss account prepared in accordance with the provisions Sec 381(1)(a) and Sec 198
of Act.
*Net profit means the net profit of company as per its financial statement prepared in accordance with the
applicable provisions of the Act, but shall not include the following, namely: -
(i) any profit arising from any overseas branch(es) of the company, whether operated as a
separate company or otherwise; and
(ii) any dividend received from other companies in India, which are covered under and complying
with the provisions of section 135.
Note: Schedule VII of the Act provides for the list of activities which may be included by Companies in their
CSR policies.
1. Where company has not completed period of 3 F.Y.s since its incorporation, net profits during
such immediately preceding financial years shall be considered
2. If unspent amount relates to any ongoing project refer Sec 135(6)
3. To immediate succeeding 3 financial years subject to conditions that –
(i) excess amount available for set off shall not include surplus arising out of CSR activities,
(j) Board shall pass a resolution to that effect.
✓ Shall be transferred within a period of thirty days from end of F.Y. to a special account
✓ This account is to be opened by company in that behalf for that F.Y. in any scheduled bank
to be called Unspent Corporate Social Responsibility Account
✓ Such amount shall be spent by company within a period of 3 F.Ys from date of such
transfer
✓ In case of failure to spend, company shall transfer same to a Fund specified in Schedule VII,
within period of 30 days from date of completion of 3rd F.Y.
Penalty
Company • Twice the amount required to be transferred to Fund
specified in Schedule VII or Unspent Corporate Social
Responsibility Account, or
• ₹1 crore
CSR Committee
Company not
Private company
Consists of 3 or required to appoint
having only two Foreign company
more directors an independent
directors
director
Rule 2 defines CSR policy as a statement containing approach and direction given by Board, after
recommendations of its CSR Committee, and includes guiding principles for
→ Impact assessment reports shall be placed before Board and shall be annexed to the annual
report on CSR.
→ Impact assessment expenditure may be booked towards CSR, but it shall not exceed 2% of
total CSR expenditure for that F.Y. or ₹50 lakh, whichever is higher.
9.11 Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
# Company engaged in research and development (R&D) activity of new vaccine, drugs and medical
devices in their normal course of business may undertake R &D activity of new vaccine, drugs and
medical devices related to COVID-19 for financial years 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23 subject to -
(a) such activities shall be carried out in collaboration with any of the organisations mentioned
in item (ix) of Schedule VII to the Act;
(b) details of such activity shall be disclosed separately in the Annual report on CSR included in
the Board’s Report;
→ Every entity, who intends to undertake any CSR activity, shall register itself with Central
Government by filing form CSR-1 with Registrar, with effect from 1st April 2021
o Form CSR-1 shall be signed and submitted electronically and shall be verified digitally by
a CA / CS / Cost Accountant in practice.
o Upon submission, a unique CSR Registration Number shall be generated by system
automatically.
→ Company may collaborate with other companies for undertaking CSR activities in such
manner that CSR committees of respective companies can report separately on such projects
in accordance with these rules.
9.13 CSR Expenditure [Rule 7]
Eradicating hunger, poverty and malnutrition, promoting health care and sanitation including
contribution to Swach Bharat Kosh
Promoting education, including special education and emplyoment enhancing vocation skills and
livelihood enhancement projects
Promoting gender equality, empowering women, setting up homes and hostels for women and
orphans, setting up old age homes, day care centres and other facilities for senior citizens and
measures for reducing inequalities faced by backward groups
Ensuring environmental sustainability, ecological balance, protection of flora and fauna, animal
welfare, agroforestry, conservation of natural resources, and maintaining quality of soil, air and
water including contribution to Clean Ganga Fund
Protection of national heritage, art & culture including restoration of buildings & sites of historical
importance and works of art; setting up public libraries; promotion and development of traditional
arts and handicrafts
Measures for the benefit of armed forces veterans, war widows and their dependents, Central
Armed Police Forces and Central Para Military Forces veterans, and their dependents
Training to promote rural sports, nationally recognised sports, paralympic sports and Olympic sports
Contribution to Prime Minister's National Relief fund, PM CARES Fund, any other fund set up by the
CG for socio economic development and relief and welfare of SC/ST/OBC, minorities and women.
Contributions to incubators or research development projects funded by CG, SG, or any agency or
PSU of CG/SG and contributions to public funded Universities, IITs, National Laboratories &
autonomus bodies under DAE; DBT; DST; DoP; AYUSH; MeitY and other research bodies
MCA has made a clarification via circulars that following shall be eligible CSR activity -
Learning Outcomes – F
• Understand the procedure for appointment of auditors, their removal, resignation, eligibility,
qualifications, disqualifications, and remuneration.
• Know the powers and duties of auditors.
• Know about auditing services and certain services which an auditor cannot render.
INTRODUCTION
Large business corporations are managed by the directors who represent the members who are the
real owners of the company through BOD. In the absence of any check the directors may mismanage
the finances of the organisation. Thus members appoint auditors to look into the true and fair view of
the financial affairs of the company.
The provisions relating to audit and auditors of companies have been dealt with under Chapter X of the
Companies Act, 2013 [Section 139 to 148] and the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014.
APPOINTMENT OF AUDITOR
Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides provisions for appointment of auditors.
→ Every company shall appoint an individual or firm as an auditor of the company at the
first AGM.
→ Tenure: The auditor shall hold office from the conclusion of 1st AGM till the conclusion of its
6th AGM and thereafter till the conclusion of every 6th AGM.
The company shall inform the concerned auditor of his or its appointment and also file a notice (in
the form ADT-1) of such appointment with the ROC within 15 days of the meeting in which the auditor
is appointed.
As on the date of appointment no audit firm having a common partner or partners to the other audit
firm, whose tenure has expired in a company immediately preceding the F.Y., shall be appointed as
auditor of the same company for a period of 5 years.
Note: According to Rule 3 (3) of the NFRA Rules, every body corporate, other than a company as defined in
section 2(20) of the Act, formed in India, and governed under the NFRA Rules shall, within 15 days of
appointment of an auditor u/s 139 (1), inform the NFRA in Form NFRA-1, the particulars of the auditor
appointed by such body corporate.
Section 139 (2) and Rule 5 - Classes of companies (except OPC and small
companies)
all unlisted public
all private companies all companies having paid up share capital of
companies having
Listed having paid up share below above threshold limit, but having public
paid-up share capital
companies capital of Rs. 50 crores borrowings from financial institutions, banks
of Rs. 10 crores or
or more or public deposits of Rs. 50 crores or more.
more
Cooling period
An individual auditor who has completed his term shall An audit firm which has completed his term shall not be
not be eligible for re-appointment as auditor in the same eligible for re-appointment as auditor in the same
company for 5 years from the completion of his term company for 5 years from the completion of such term
3) Company which has appointed joint auditors – the company may follow the rotation of
auditors in such a manner that both or all of the joint auditors do not complete their term
in the same year.
Appointment of first
auditors
If the BOD fails - company may CAG fails - BOD shall appoint within
appoint within 90 days at an EGM next 30 days
The first auditor shall hold office until the conclusion of the first AGM.
Appointment of subsequent
auditors
Where at any AGM, no auditor is appointed or re-appointed, the existing director shall
continue to be the auditor of the company.
NFRA Rule 8 and Rule 9 are relevant for understanding of the students and included in CA Intermediate
Syllabus.
Rule 5 requires every auditor of classes of companies and bodies corporate governed by the NFRA,
shall file a return with the Authority i.e. NFRA on or before 30th November every year in Form NFRA-2.
9 4.1 Removal of auditor before the expiry of his term [Section 140 (1)]
✓ The auditor may be removed from his office before the expiry of his term only by –
Section 140 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for removal, resignation of auditor and giving of
special notice.
If the auditor has resigned from the company, he shall file a statement in Form ADT-3 with the
company and the ROC (also with CAG in case of government companies or companies controlled
by CG/SG), indicating the reasons and other facts about his resignation, within 30 days of
resignation.
If the auditor does not comply with these provisions, he shall be punishable with penalty of
→ ₹ 50,000/-, or
→ An amount equal to the remuneration of the auditor,
whichever is less.
→ In case of continuing failure, the auditor shall be punishable with a further penalty of ₹
500/- for each day during which the failure continues, subject to a maximum of ₹2,00,000.
4.3 Appointing auditor other than retiring auditor [Section 140 (4)]
4.4 Auditor acts in a fraudulent manner or abetted or colluded in any fraud [Section
140 (5)]
• Suo moto or
• On an application made to it by –
o The CG or
o Any other person,
if it is satisfied that the auditor has, directly or indirectly, acted in a fraudulent manner, or abetted or
colluded in any fraud by/ in relation to, the company or its directors or employees, it may by an order
direct the company to change its auditors.
Such an auditor, whether individual or firm, against whom an order has been passed
→ shall not be eligible to be appointed as auditor of any company for 5 years from the date
of passing the order, and
→ shall also be liable for action u/s 447.
Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides eligibility, qualifications, and disqualifications of
auditors.
Qualifications
of an auditor
A person shall be A firm (including LLP) where majority Only partners who are
eligible to be of partners practicig in India are Chartered Accountants
appointed only if qualified for being appointed may be shall be authorized to sign
he is a CA appointed by its firm name on behalf of the firm
The following persons shall not be qualified for appointment as auditor of a company-
a) A body corporate other than LLP registered under the LLP Act, 2008,
they are
one person is related
members of a they are
to the other in such
Hindu husband and
manner as may be
Undivided wife
prescribed
Family (HUF)
REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS
Section 142 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for remuneration of auditors.
Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the powers and duties of the auditors and
compliance with the auditing standards.
• at all times
Access to books of
• whether kept at the registered office or at any other
accounts and vouchers place.
Matters of inquiry
3) Report on the
accounts of the branch •whether it has been sent to him and
office audited by other •the manner in which he has dealt with it in preparing his report.
person
4) Company's BS and
•whether in agreement with the books of account and returns
P&L account
5) Accounting standards •whether FS comply with it.
6) Financial transactions
•the auditor's observations and comments on such matters which have an
or matters which have
adverse effect on the functioning of the company.
any adverse effect
•whether any director is disqualified from being appointed as director u/s
7) Director
164 (2).
8) Maintenance of
accounts and other •any qualification, reservation or adverse remark realting to them
matters
9) Internal Financial •whether company has adequate IFC with reference to FS in place and
controls (IFC) # operating effectiveness of such controls.
•whether company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations in its FS
10) Other matters as •whether adequate provisions has been made for material forseeable
prescribed* losses
•whether there has been any delay in transferring amounts to IEPF
Where any matter is answered in the negative or with a qualification, the auditor’s report shall state the reason
for the same.
Amendment in ‘Other matters as prescribed’ – Following clauses were inserted by Companies (Audit
and Auditors) Amendment Rules. 2021:
→ Whether management has represented that, to best of its knowledge and belief, other than as
disclosed in notes to accounts,
i. no funds have been advanced/loaned/invested by company to or in any other person(s) or
entity(ies), including foreign entities (“Intermediaries”), with understanding, whether
recorded in writing or otherwise, that Intermediary shall, whether, directly or indirectly
lend/invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner by or on behalf of company
(“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide any guarantee, security or like on behalf of Ultimate
Beneficiaries;
ii. no funds have been received by company from any person(s) or entity(ies), including foreign
entities (“Funding Parties”), with understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise,
that company shall, whether, directly or indirectly, lend/invest in other persons or entities
identified in any manner by or on behalf of Funding Party (“Ultimate Beneficiaries”) or provide
any guarantee, security or like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries; and
→ Based on such audit procedures that auditor has considered reasonable and appropriate in
circumstances, nothing has come to their notice that has caused them to believe that above
representations contain any material mis-statement.
→ Whether dividend declared or paid during the year by company is in compliance with section 123
of the Companies Act, 2013.
→ Whether company, in respect of financial years commencing on or after 1st April, 2022, 2023 has
used such accounting software for maintaining its books of account which has a feature of
recording audit trail (edit log) facility and same has been operated throughout the year for all
transactions recorded in software and audit trail feature has not been tampered with and audit
trail has been preserved by company as per the statutory requirements for record retention.
7.2.5 To comply with the auditing standards –
Every auditor shall comply with the auditing standards as prescribed by the CG upon
recommendation of the ICAI in consultation with and after examination of the recommendations
made by the NFRA. Until they are notified, standards of auditing specified by ICAI are deemed to
be the auditing standards.
Every comment given by the CAG upon, or supplement to, the audit report shall be sent by the
company to every person entitled to copies of audited FS and also be placed before the AGM of
the company along with the audit report.
→ The branch auditor shall prepare a report on the accounts of the branch examined by him and
sent it to the auditor of the company who shall deal with it in his report in such manner as he
considers necessary.
→ Provisions regarding reporting of fraud by the auditor shall also extend to the branch auditor
to the extent that it relates to the concerned branch.
Note: The provisions of this section shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Cost Auditor and a Secretarial
Auditor during the performance of his duties u/s 148 and 204 respectively.
Section 144 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for auditor not to render certain services.
Design and
implementation
Management of any financial
services Prohibited information
systems
services
Rendering of
outsourced Actuarial
financial services
services
Investment Investment
banking advisory
services services
The auditor shall not, directly or indirectly, render these services to the company or its subsidiary or
holding company.
Self Firm
Subsidiary of firm
Entity in which such individual has
significant influence or control
Associate entity of firm
Entity whose name or trademark
or brand is used by such individual
Entity in which such firm has significant
influence
Section 145 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for auditors to sign audit reports, etc.
✓ The person appointed as an auditor of the company shall sign the auditor’s report or sign or
certify any other document of the company.
✓ The qualifications, observations or comments on financial transactions or matters, which
have any adverse effect on the functioning of the company mentioned in the auditor’s report
shall be read before the company in GM and shall be open for inspection by any member.
Section 146 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for auditors to attend general meeting.
All notices of and other communications relating to, any GM shall be forwarded
to the auditor of the company.
The auditor shall unless otherwise exempted by the company, attend any
GM either by himself or through his authorized representatives, who shall
also be qualified to be an auditor.
The auditor shall have a right to be heard on any matter which concerns him as
the auditor.
Section 147 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for punishment for contravention.
Section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the provisions for CG to specify the audit of items of
cost in respect of certain companies.
• The CG may, by order, in repsect of such class or classess of companies engaged in the
production of such goods or providing such services as may be prescribed, direct that
particulars relating to the utilisation of material or labour or to other cost items as may be
prescribed shall also be included in the books of account kept u/s 128 by that class of
companies.
• The CG may, by order, direct that the audit of cost records of class of companies, which are
covered above and which have a net worth or turnover of such amount as may be prescribed,
shall be conducted in the manner specified in the order.
• Cost Audit shall be conducted by a Cost Accountant who shall be appointed by the BOD on
such remuneration as may be determined by the members. It shall be in addition to audit
conducted under Sec 143.
Note:
Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 defines “Cost
Accountant”. It means a Cost Accountant who holds a valid certificate of practice under sub-section (1)
of section 6 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 and is in whole-time practice. Cost
Accountant includes a Firm of Cost Accountants and a LLP of cost accountants.
Applicable for a domestic or a foreign company engaged in production of goods or providing services
listed in table A (Regulated) or B (Non-regulated) of Rule 3, which have a overall turnover from all of its
products and services ≥ 35 crore (immediately preceding financial year).
2 10 10 20 20 40 Yes
3 0 10 10 30 40 Yes
4 10 0 10 30 40 Yes
5 20 20 40 0 40 Yes
6 0* 0* 0 40 40 No
Note:
Nothing contained in Rule 3 shall apply to a company which is classified as a micro enterprise or a
small enterprise including as per the turnover criteria under sub-section (9) of section 7 of the
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.
Every company covered by rule 3 explained above under these rules including all units and branches
thereof, shall, in respect of each of its financial year maintain cost records in form CRA-1.
The cost records shall be maintained on regular basis in such manner as to facilitate calculation of per
unit cost of production or cost of operations, cost of sales and margin for each of its products and
activities for every financial year on monthly or quarterly or half-yearly or annual basis.
The cost records shall be maintained in such manner so as to enable the company to exercise, as far
as possible, control over the various operations and costs to achieve optimum economies in utilisation
of resources and these records shall also provide necessary data which is required to be furnished
under these rules.
✓ A person appointed as auditor of the company u/s 139 shall not be appointed as cost
auditor u/s 148.
✓ The cost auditor shall comply with the cost auditing standards.
The paid up share capital or turnover or outstanding loans, or borrowings or debentures or deposits,
as the case may be, as existing on the date of last audited financial statements shall be taken into
account for the purposes of this rule.
It is also worth noting that where a company ceases to fulfil any of three conditions laid down above
for three consecutive years, it shall not be required to comply with the provisions pertaining to audit
committee until such time as it meets any of such conditions.
Note: The provisions of sub-section (12) of section 143 of the Act and the relevant rules made
thereunder shall apply mutatis mutandis to a cost auditor during performance of his functions under
section 148 of the Act and rule notified thereunder.
Further sub-rule 3 to rule 4 provides exception from cost audits. The requirement for cost audit shall
not apply to a company which is covered in rule 3, and
a. Whose revenue from exports, in foreign exchange, exceeds seventy five percent of its total revenue;
or
c. Which is engaged in generation of electricity for captive consumption through Captive Generating
PIant. For this purpose, the term “Captive Generating Plant” shall have the same meaning as assigned
in rule 3 of the Electricity Rules, 2005.
1 10 10 20 10 30 No No
2 10 10 20 20 40 Yes No
3 20 20 40 0 40 Yes No
4 10 20 30 10 40 Yes No
9 10 10 20 80 100 Yes No
10 15 15 30 10 40 Yes No
11 20 20 40 8 48 Yes No
12.4 Manner and Procedure – Appointment, Removal and Resignation [Rule 6 of Companies
(Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014
The manner and procedure of selection of auditors by the members of the company at AGM has
been prescribed under the Rule 3 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014; tabled and
stated below.
Categories of Competent Responsibility of the competent authority
Companies authority
Audit Committee The competent authority shall take into
A company
which is consideration the qualifications and
required to experience of the individual or the firm
constitutean proposed to be considered for appointment
Audit as auditor and such qualifications and
Committee experience are commensurate with the size
under section and requirementsof the company
177
Where competent authority is audit committee, the committee shall recommend the name of
an individual or a firm as auditor to the Board for consideration; the Board shall consider and
recommend an individual or a firm as auditor to the members in the AGM for appointment.
a. If the Board agrees with the recommendation of the Audit Committee - It shall further
recommend the appointment of an individual or a firm as auditor to the members in the
annual general meeting.
b. If the Board disagrees with the recommendation of the Audit Committee - It shall refer
back the recommendation to the committee for reconsideration citing reasons for such
disagreement.
Note:
Section 177 of the Act, read with Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014
provides Audit Committee shall be constituted by Board of directors in case of;
It is also worth noting that where a company ceases to fulfil any of three conditions laid down
above for three consecutive years, it shall not be required to comply with the provisions
pertaining to audit committee until such time as it meets any of such conditions.
→ Company and every officer in default shall be punishable in the manner as provided in
Section 147 (1),
→ Cost auditor in default shall be punishable in the manner as provided u/s 147 (2) & (3).
Learning Outcomes –
• Understand the meaning, characteristics, and elements of different kinds of negotiable instruments.
• Know the parties to notes, bills and cheques, various ways of negotiation of the instruments and
their presentment.
• Know the concepts of noting and protest, and of dishonour of instrument.
INTRODUCTION
The main objective of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is to legalise the system by which
instruments contemplated by it could pass from hand to hand by negotiation like any other goods.
The Act was introduced on 1st March,1881. The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies to the
whole of India, but nothing herein contained affects the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, or affects any local
usage relating to any instrument in an oriental language.
The Act was amended several times. Recent three amendments made in this Act were the Negotiable
Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002; the Negotiable Instruments
(Amendment) Act, 2015 and the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2018. Latter came into effect
from September 1, 2018.
Types of Negotiable
Instrument [Sec. 13]
Bill of
Promissory note Cheque
exchange
Can be
Holders title transferred
is free from any number of
Freely defects times till its Must contain an
transferable satisfaction unconditional
from one promise or
person to order to pay
another money
The sum
payable, the
Should be time of
signed payment, the
payee, must be
certain
Characteristics Instrument
Necessarily in
of Negotiable should be
writing
Instruments delivered
PROMISSORY NOTE
Section 4 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides provisions relating to promissory
note.
A promissory note is
Maker/Drawer Payee/Drawee
Promise should be
An express promise
In writing definite and
to pay
unconditional
BILLS OF EXCHANGE
Section 5 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides provisions relating to bills of
exchange.
Bill of exchange is
→ an instrument in writing
→ containing an unconditional order,
(c) Order must be definite and (d) Drawer, drawee, and payee must
unconditional be certain.
(e) Drawer must sign the instrument (f) Sum must be certain
Mr. Sam
(drawer)
` 10,000/-
Four months after date, pay to Mr. B (Payee) a sum of Rupees Ten Thousand, for value
received.
To,
Mr. C (Drawee)
576, Arera Colony, Bhopal (M.P.)
Signature
Section 6 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides provisions relating to bills of exchange.
Payee
Drawer
Drawee in case of need – When in the bill or in any indorsement thereon the name of any person
is given in addition to the drawee to be resorted to in case of need such person is called a “drawee
in case of need”.
Note: All cheques are bills but all bills are not cheques.
ABC Bank
622, Vijay Nagar, Indore (M. P.)
Signature
A person desiring to accept for honour must, on writing on the bill in his own hand, declare that
he accepts under protest the protested bill for the honour of the drawer or of a particular indorser in
whose names, or generally for honor.
i. The holder must consent to acceptance for honor. The holder cannot be compelled to
assent to acceptance for honor.
ii. The bill must have been noted or protested for the non-acceptance or for better security.
iii. Acceptance for honor can be made by a person who is not already liable on the bill.
iv. It must be made by writing on the bill.
v. It must be for the whole amount due on the bill.
vi. Acceptance must be for the honor of any party already able on the bill.
vii. Acceptance for honor must be made before to bill is overdue.
Example: On a Bill of Exchange for ₹1 lakh, X’s acceptance to the Bill is forged. ‘A’ takes the Bill from his
customer for value and in good faith before the Bill becomes payable. As ‘A’ in this case prima facie became
a possessor of the bill for value and in good faith before the bill became payable, he can be considered as a
holder in due course. But where a signature on the negotiable instrument is forged, it becomes a nullity. The
holder of a forged instrument cannot enforce payment thereon.
✓ The holder must have paid valuable consideration. When given as a gift or has been
inherited, the transferee cannot be a holder in due course.
✓ The holder must acquire the instrument before its maturity.
✓ The holder must have obtained the instrument in good faith.
✓ The instrument must be complete and regular on the face of it.
Inland and
•Inland Instrument: A promissory note, BoE or cheque drawn or made
Foreign in India and made payable in, or drawn upon any person resident in
Instrument India shall be deemed to be an inland instrument.
[Section 11 •Foreign Instrument: Instrument which is not an inland instrument
& 12]
(iv) A, resident of Mumbai, drew a bill of exchange in Mumbai on B, a merchant in Mathura. And B
accepted the bill of exchange as payable in London. It is also an inland bill of exchange. In this
case, the bill of exchange was drawn in India on a person resident in India. It is immaterial that
the amount is payable in London. An inland instrument remains inland even if it has been
endorsed in a foreign country.
(iv) If the bills of exchange mentioned in above two examples, are endorsed in France, they will
remain inland bills.
When a negotiable instrument is transferred to any person with a view to constitute the person
holder thereof, the instrument is deemed to have been negotiated [Section 14].
When an instrument is conditionally or for a special purpose only, the property in it does not pass to the
transferee, even though it is indorsed to him, unless the instrument is negotiated to a holder in due
course [Section 46].
Subject to the provisions of section 58 [Instrument obtained by unlawful means or for unlawful
consideration], a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable to bearer is negotiable by
delivery thereof.
Exception: A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque delivered on condition that it is not to take
effect except in a certain event is not negotiable (except in the hands of a holder for value without
notice of the condition) unless such event happens.
Subject to the provisions of section 58, a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable to order,
is negotiable by the holder by indorsement and delivery thereof.
Modes of Negotiation
By delivery
Indorsement and
delivery
Actual
Sections 138 to 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides for criminal penalties in the event of
dishonour of cheques for insufficiency of funds.
• either because of –
o amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient, or
o that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with
that bank,
When a cheque is dishonored, it shall be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that the holder
of a cheque received the cheque of the nature referred to in section 138 for the discharge, in
whole or in part, or any debt or other liability.
The effect of this presumption is that the evidential burden rests on the accused.
10.3 Defense which may not be allowed in any prosecution under section 138 [Section 140]
It shall not be a defence in a prosecution of an offence under section 138 that the drawer had no
reason to believe when he issued the cheque that the cheque may be dishonored on
presentment for the reasons stated in that section.
PRESENTMENT OF INSTRUMENTS
A bill of exchange payable after sight must [if no time or place is specified therein for presentment]
be presented to the drawee thereof for acceptance [if he can, after reasonable search, be found] by
a person entitled to demand acceptance, within a reasonable time afterit is drawn, and in business
hours on a business day.
In default of such presentment, no party thereto is liable thereon to the person making such default.
If the drawee cannot, after reasonable search, be found, the bill is dishonoured.
If the bill is directed to the drawee at a particular place, it must be presented at that place,and
if at the due date for presentment he cannot, after reasonable search, be found there,the bill
is dishonoured.
Where authorised by agreement or usage, a presentment through the post office by means of
a registered letter is sufficient.
11.2 Presentment of promissory note for sight [Section 62]
A promissory note, payable at a certain period after sight, must be presented to the maker thereof
for sight (if he can after reasonable search be found) by a person entitled to demand payment, within
a reasonable time after it is made and in business hours on a business day.
In default of such presentment, no party thereto is liable thereon to the person making such default.
11.3 Drawee's time for deliberation [Section 63]
The holder must, if so required by the drawee of a bill of exchange presented to him for acceptance,
allow the drawee 48 hours (exclusive of public holidays) to consider whether hewill accept it.
11.4 Presentment for payment [Section 64]
Promissory notes, bill of exchange and cheques must be presented for payment to the
maker, acceptor or drawee thereof respectively, by or on behalf of the holder as
hereinafter provided.
Exception: Where a promissory note is payable on demand and is not payable at a specified place, no
presentment is necessary in order to charge the maker thereof.
Notwithstanding anything contained in section 6, where an electronic image of a truncated cheque is
presented for payment, the drawee bank is entitled to demand any further information regarding the
truncated cheque from the bank holding the truncated cheque incase of any reasonable suspicion
about the genuineness of the apparent tenor of instrument, and if the suspicion is that of any fraud,
forgery, tampering or destruction of the instrument, it is entitled to further demand the presentment
of the truncated cheque itselffor verification:
Provided that the truncated cheque so demanded by the drawee bank shall be retained by it, if the
payment is made accordingly.
Hours for presentment (Section 65)
Presentment for payment must be made during the usual hours of business, and, if at a bankers
within banking hours.
Presentment for payment of instrument payable after date or sight (Section 66)
A promissory note or bill of exchange, made payable at a specified period after date or sight thereof,
must be presented for payment at maturity.
Presentment for payment of promissory note payable by instalments(Section 67)
A promissory note payable by instalments must be presented for payment on the third dayafter
the date fixed for payment of each instalment; and non-payment on such presentmenthas the same
effect as non-payment of a note at maturity.
Presentment for payment of instrument payable at specified place and not elsewhere (Section
68)
A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque made, drawn or accepted payable at a specified place
and not elsewhere must, in order to charge any party thereto, be presentedfor payment at that
place.
Instrument payable at specified place (Section 69)
A promissory note or bill of exchange made, drawn or accepted payable at a specified place must, in
order to charge the maker or drawer thereof, be presented for payment at that place.
Presentment where no exclusive place specified (Section 70)
A promissory note or bill of exchange, not made payable as mentioned in sections 68 and69,
must be presented for payment at the place of business (if any) or at the usual residence,of the
maker, drawee or acceptor thereof, as the case may be.
Presentment when maker, etc., has no known place of business or residence (Section 71)
If the maker, drawee or acceptor of a negotiable instrument has no known place of business or fixed
Subject to the provisions of section 84, a cheque must, in order to charge the drawer, be presented at
the bank upon which it is drawn before the relation between the drawer andhis banker has been
altered to the prejudice of the drawer.
Presentment of cheque to charge any other person (Section 73)
A cheque must, in order to charge any person except the drawer, be presented within a reasonable
time after delivery thereof by such person.
Presentment of instrument payable on demand (Section 74)
Subject to the provisions of section 31, a negotiable instrument payable on demand must be presented
for payment within a reasonable time after it is received by the holder.
Presentment by or to agent, representative of deceased, or assignee ofinsolvent (Section
75)
Presentment for acceptance or payment may be made to the duly authorised agent of the drawee,
maker or acceptor, as the case may be, or, where the drawee, maker or acceptor has died, to his
legal representative, or, where he has been declared an insolvent, to his assignee.
Excuse for delay in presentment for acceptance or payment (Section 75A)
Delay in presentment for acceptance or payment is excused if the delay is caused by circumstances
beyond the control of the holder, and not imputable to his default,misconduct or negligence.
When the cause of the delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made within a reasonable
time.
When presentment unnecessary (Section 76)
No presentment for payment is necessary, and the instrument is dishonoured at the due date
for presentment, in any of the following cases:
(a) (i) If the maker, drawee or acceptor intentionally prevents the presentment of the instrument,
or
if the instrument being payable at his place of business, he closes such place on a business day
during the usual business hours, or
(ii) if the instrument being payable at some other specified place, neither he norany person
authorised to pay it attends at such place during the usual business hours, or
(iii) if the instrument not being payable at any specified place, he cannot after due search be found;
(b) as against any party sought to be charged therewith, if he has engaged to pay notwithstanding non-
presentment;
(c) as against any party if, after maturity, with knowledge that the instrument has notbeen
presented—
When a bill of exchange, accepted payable at a specified bank, has been duly presented there
for payment and dishonoured, if the banker so negligently or improperly keeps, dealswith or
delivers back such bill as to cause loss to the holder, he must compensate the holder for such loss.
The compensation payable in case of dishonour of promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque,
by any party liable to the holder or any endorsee, shall be determined by the following rules:
(a) the holder is entitled to the amount due upon the instrument, together with the expenses
properly incurred in presenting, noting and protesting it;
(b) when the person charged resides at a place different from that at which the instrument was
payable, the holder is entitled to receive such sum at the current rateof exchange between the
two places;
(c) an endorser who, being liable, has paid the amount due on the same is entitled to the amount
so paid with interest at 18% per annum from the date of payment until tender or realisation
thereof, together with all expenses caused by the dishonour and payment;
(d) when the person charged and such endorser reside at different places, the endorseris entitled
to receive such sum at the current rate of exchange between the two places;
(e) the party entitled to compensation may draw a bill upon the party liable to compensate him,
payable at sight or on demand, for the amount due to him, together with all expenses
properly incurred by him. Such bill must be accompaniedby the instrument dishonoured and
the protest thereof (if any). If such bill is dishonoured, the party dishonouring the same is liable
to make compensation thereof in the same manner as in the case of the original bill.