Finite Difference Method
Finite Difference Method
In mathematics, finite-difference methods are numerical methods for approximating the solutions to differential
equations using finite difference equations to approximate derivatives.
Contents
1 Intuitive derivation
2 Derivation from Taylor's polynomial
3 Accuracy and order
4 Example: ordinary differential equation
5 Example: The heat equation
5.1 Explicit method
5.2 Implicit method
5.3 Crank-Nicolson method
6 See also
7 References
8 External links
Intuitive derivation
Finite-difference methods approximate the solutions to differential equations by replacing derivative expressions
with approximately equivalent difference quotients. That is, because the first derivative of a function f is, by
definition,
for some small value of h. In fact, this is the forward difference equation for the first derivative. Using this and
similar formulae to replace derivative expressions in differential equations, one can approximate their solutions
without the need for calculus.
where n! denotes the factorial of n, and Rn (x) is a remainder term, denoting the difference between the Taylor
polynomial of degree n and the original function. Again using the first derivative of the function f as an example,
by Taylor's theorem,
…wikipedia.org/…/Finite_difference_… 1/5
4/2/2009 Finite difference method - Wikipedia, …
which, with some minor algebraic manipulation, is equivalent to
the dominant term of the local truncation error can be discovered. For example, again using the forward-
difference formula for the first derivative, knowing that f(x i) = f(x 0 + ih),
and further noting that the quantity on the left is the approximation from the finite difference method and that the
quantity on the right is the exact quantity of interest plus a remainder, clearly that remainder is the local truncation
error. A final expression of this example and its order is:
This means that, in this case, the local truncation error is proportional to the step size.
The Euler method for solving this equation uses the finite difference quotient
to approximate the differential equation by first substituting in for u'(x) and applying a little algebra to get
The last equation is a finite-difference equation, and solving this equation gives an approximate solution to the
differential equation.
(boundary condition)
(initial condition)
One way to numerically solve this equation is to approximate all the derivatives by finite differences. We partition
the domain in space using a mesh x 0,...,x J and in time using a mesh t 0,....,t N. We assume a uniform partition both
in space and in time, so the difference between two consecutive space points will be h and between two
consecutive time points will be k. The points
Explicit method
Using a forward difference at time t n and a second-order central difference
for the space derivative at position x j ("FTCS") we get the recurrence
equation:
where r = k / h2.
So, knowing the values at time n you can obtain the corresponding ones at time n+1 using this recurrence
relation. and must be replaced by the boundary conditions, in this example they are both 0.
This explicit method is known to be numerically stable and convergent whenever . The numerical
errors are proportional to the time step and the square of the space step:
…wikipedia.org/…/Finite_difference_… 3/5
4/2/2009 Finite difference method - Wikipedia, …
Implicit method
If we use the backward difference at time t n + 1 and a second-order central
difference for the space derivative at position x j ("BTCS") we get the
recurrence equation:
The scheme is always numerically stable and convergent but usually more numerically intensive than the explicit
method as it requires solving a system of numerical equations on each time step. The errors are linear over the
time step and quadratic over the space step.
Crank-Nicolson method
Finally if we use the central difference at time t n + 1 / 2 and a second-order central difference for the space
derivative at position x j ("CTCS") we get the recurrence equation:
The scheme is always numerically stable and convergent but usually more numerically intensive as it requires
solving a system of numerical equations on each time step. The errors are quadratic over the time step and
formally are of the fourth degree regarding the space step:
However, near the boundaries, the error is often O(h2) instead of O(h4).
Usually the Crank-Nicolson scheme is the most accurate scheme for small time steps. The explicit scheme is the
least accurate and can be unstable, but is also the easiest to implement and the least numerically intensive. The
implicit scheme works the best for large time steps.
See also
Difference operator
…wikipedia.org/…/Finite_difference_… 4/5
4/2/2009 Finite difference method - Wikipedia, …
Stencil (numerical analysis)
Five-point stencil
Lax-Richtmyer theorem
References
K.W. Morton and D.F. Mayers, Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations, An
Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Oliver Rübenkönig, The Finite Difference Method (FDM) - An introduction
(http://www.imtek.de/simulation/mathematica/IMSweb/imsTOC/Lectures%20and%20Tips/Simulation%20I/FDM_introDocu.html)
, (2006) Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg
Autar Kaw and E. Eric Kalu, Numerical Methods with Applications, (2008) [1]
(http://www.autarkaw.com/books/numericalmethods/index.html)
External links
Internet Resources for the Finite Difference Method for PDEs
(http://math.fullerton.edu/mathews/n2003/finitediffpde/FiniteDifferencePDEBib/Links/FiniteDifferencePDEBib_lnk_1.html)
Finite Difference Method of Solving ODEs (Boundary Value Problems) Notes, PPT, Maple, Mathcad,
Matlab, Mathematica (http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu/topics/finite_difference_method.html)
…wikipedia.org/…/Finite_difference_… 5/5