The document discusses contract change management, focusing on uncertainties and changes that arise during procurement and contract implementation. It outlines various interventions to mitigate uncertainties, types of change orders, and the management of time delays and overruns, including justifiable and non-justifiable delays. Additionally, it covers the implications of delays on costs, claims for damages, and the rights of contractors and project owners in relation to contract obligations.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views32 pages
Lecture 5
The document discusses contract change management, focusing on uncertainties and changes that arise during procurement and contract implementation. It outlines various interventions to mitigate uncertainties, types of change orders, and the management of time delays and overruns, including justifiable and non-justifiable delays. Additionally, it covers the implications of delays on costs, claims for damages, and the rights of contractors and project owners in relation to contract obligations.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 32
WOLAITA UNIVERSITY
Procurement And Contract Management
Contract Change Management Betelhem A. December 2019 Contract Changes Management
The two most important issues considered in contract
change management are Uncertainties and Changes. Uncertainties: are issues that can be either difficult to reasonably predict or unknown during the planning phase of procurement and contract management.
Changes: are issues require alterations
during the implementation phase of procurement and contract management. Information Influence and Uncertainty Cost
Project Project Project Ti
Formulation Implementation Completion Phase Phase Phase Time Uncertainties are multi-dimensional. They can be Information related, and / or Time based, and / or Ambition related; etc. Besides, they deal with complexity, risk, opportunity, ambiguity and confusion associated with the project under consideration.
For instance, when uncertainty is understood
as the difference between the amount of information required to perform the task and the amount of information already available by the planning team. Uncertainty is higher in the early phase and reduces through time by getting more and better information.
Uncertainty is not only related to the future
but also the knowledge of the past as well, that is; information records and experience.
Uncertainty can never be eliminated.
Therefore, all projects will be planned under a certain level of uncertainty. That is why changes occur during implementation. Uncertainties can be mitigated using the following four interventions used in project contracts:
Absorbing: Understanding projects are
planned under uncertainty and changes are expected during implementations imply alternative provisions for implementation phases such as Contingencies, which are made and used to absorb changes caused by uncertainties. Dividing or Splitting: When a project uncertainty is high or there is less past experience, dividing projects into packages or different phases in order to make them smaller in sizes and their complexities, etc is to divide or split to reduce risks due to uncertainties.
Postponing: When Contracts could not clearly
state specifications, quantities and estimates; they often place Provisional Quantity or Provisional Sum to postpone uncertainties. Transferring: Lump Sum Contracts, DB and BOT delivery systems are some form of contractual approaches to transfer uncertainties from Owners to Providers. Requirement Changes Management Systems
Clauses 51 and 52 of the General Conditions of
FIDIC Red Book provided provisions for Alterations (Additions and Omissions) to enable Project Owners use the Engineer (the Consultant) to make requirement Changes.
They can cause review of designs and / or
create additional or changes in designs and / or just work orders to instruct contractors to carryout the requirement changes. While project owners retain the right to requirement changes, the contractor is obliged to accept as per the conditions of the contract.
However, the contractor is entitled to request and
agree upon new or existing rates for such changes.
Change Orders are written instructions, agreed
by the Project Owner or His Representative, directing the Project Doer to make changes. There are three kinds of Change Orders: Unilateral Change Order: provides the right to any of the parties to make changes without causing any effect on the other parties or disrespecting any laws, regulations and rules binding the contract and itself It requires notification to the other parties for knowledge.
Bilateral Change Order: Requires the agreement and / or
consent of the two contracting parties (the Project Owners and The Project Provider). requires the respects for laws, rules and regulations binding the contract and itself . It requires notification to the other parties for knowledge. Multilateral Change Order: is a type of change order that require the agreement and / or consent of the three or more contracting parties (the Project Owners, The Project Providers, The Project Financiers and / or the Regulators). It requires the respects for laws, rules and regulations binding the contract and itself It requires notification to the other parties for knowledge. Requirement changes based on the different types of change orders modifies contracts in either of or the combinations of the following three ways: Time changes only, Time changes accompanied by Cost Compensations, and Cost Changes only. Time Changes Management System
Contract Time can either be Competitively or
Directly assigned. In both cases, Time planning can be made using different approaches such as using CPM , PERT, Bar Charts, Gantt Charts, Network Diagrams and Tables can be used to show Time Plans and Accomplishments.
Contractual Agreement finally defines the Contract
Time of a project. The Completion Time of projects include: Dates between Contract Agreement and Handing Over of Site, Mobilization Period(s), Contract Time, and Justified and Agreed Supplementary or Extension of Time. Where, Dhos = Date for Handing Over of Site; DCont = Date for Contract Agreement; Thos = Time between Contract agreement and handing over of site; Dstart = Date for Start of Construction Works; Tmob = Time for Mobilization; DComp = Date for Completion Time; Tjust = Time for Justified Delay; and Tsupp = Time for Supplementary Works or Agreements. Time Delays and Overruns Time delays can occur in components of a project or trades of works, but when their cumulative effect makes the actual completion time beyond the contract completion time, it is called time overrun. Contractors in some instances accelerate projects in order to avoid liquidated damages. In this case, though part of the project did delay; it is compensated which makes the delay irrelevant. However, contractors will lose some profit if they depend on accelerating options most often. Classification of Delay Justifiable and Non - Justifiable Delays Justifiable delays are delays that occurred due to causes which are beyond the control of project doer (contractor).
If delays are caused by project owners, the contractor
or the consultant or the supplier is directly justified for the effects on delay of the project. Force Majeur will also be one of the causes for justifiable delay. Non - Justifiable or Non - Execusable Delays are delays that occurred due to negligence to fulfill contractual obligation and are within the control of the contracting parties. Contractors or Consultants or Suppliers will be liable for Non - Justified delays.
While Justifiable delays can be either compensable or
non compensable; Non - justifiable delays will cause remedial rights for the project owners. Compensable and Non – Compensable Delays
Delay damages can involve additional costs incurred
by the contractor as a result of the extended duration of its performance. These typically include costs of idle laborers and equipment, higher costs of performance during the later period of time. Examples of the type of additional costs associated with delays include: Extended or Increased management / supervisory costs Additional payment / performance bond premiums ( how it is settled in payments) Additional liability insurance premiums Extended equipment / trailer rental costs Materials escalation costs Unanticipated weather protection Idle labor / equipment charges The other component of delay damages is the unabsorbed overhead associated with the delay period. ( if u have plenty projects it has to be divided to the No. of projects) In order to assert a valid claim for delay damages is to see your contract. There are some contractors who sign a contract with a clause: No Damage for Delay: prohibits recovering of additional costs incurred as a result of delay, regardless of the cause in creating the delay. Conditional Recovery: limits ability to recover or make a claim for delay or impact damages, so that the recovery is very much dependent on causes of delay and their CPM Network. This obviously excludes recovery for any unjustified delay damages. Additional Time and Compensation for Delays: The third view does not inhibit or limit rights to recover due to delay damages.
Certainly, the amount of compensable
damages and your ability to prove them are also a part of the decision. Typical project owners Delay Claim Liquidated Damages- are typically used when a determination of actual damages are impossible to ascertain.
Actual Damages – is collected when there is no liquidated
damages provision and off course if there is a direct involvement in the project. It includes : 1. additional supervision expenses, 2. other additional actual expenses 3. overhead expenses 4. if leased, reasonable value of loss of use and the lost rents, 5. if not leased, reasonable value of loss of use, interest expense, interest expense during the delay period and 6. foreseeable damages the owner may have incurred including lost profits from a business. . Evaluating delay claims,
In Evaluating delay claims , five
aspects must be taken into account: The effective duration of delay The effect of delay on work intended to be done The costs attributable to the delay The nature of costs / expenses The resources and acceleration / expediting measures Typical Contractors’ Delay Claim
Indirect Costs – job site overhead, extended
general conditions Home Office overheads Direct costs – Equipment, Labor and material costs Other Damages – interest on the claim, loss profits on jobs etc. Attorney Fees – if applicable in the contract document. Disruption A contractor’s work is disrupted if he is prevented from carrying out the works in accordance with an approved programme. If the prevention results from one or more of several events provided for in the contract, the contractor is able to claim for an extension of time, additional costs or both. The effect of a disruption is to prevent the contractor from working in an efficient manner or in a logical sequence. Prolongation Prolongation is a delay to a critical activity, which extends the time for completion of the whole of the works. If the cause of the delay is not the responsibility of the contractor, it is highly probable that an extension of time will be justified. Extensions of time carry with them additional costs to the contractor associated with the increase in the length of the contract period. Acceleration An acceleration arises when the contractor claims that he has had to mobilise additional resources to complete the works within the current time of completion through no fault of his own. acceleration has its own cost Remedial Rights Remedial rights are provisions entitled for non performances of the contractual obligation by the contracting parties. • Time Extension - It is a provision for justified time delays in which the delay may or may not be entitled for compensation. • Acceleration – is required when projects are needed to be completed before the contract completion time. the contractor is entitled to compensation and time extension if and only if justified delays are compensable. • Liquidated Damages
In Conclusion Following The Above Said The Best Advice For The Contractor Is: To Give Notice Timeously, in Writing, and in Terms and Condition of The Contract To Keep Adequate Records
Towards Africaoriented Risk Analysis Models A Contextual And Methodological Approach 1st Edition Korwa G Adar Richard O Iroanya Francis Nwonwu download