HARNESSING TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
HARNESSING TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
HARNESSING TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Abstract
This article discusses the role of school principals in implementing the International
Baccalaureate (IB) curriculum through transformational leadership. The research aims to
analyze how principals can foster a school culture that supports the implementation of the
IB curriculum. The method used is a qualitative approach, involving in-depth interviews
and observations. The findings indicate that principals who practice transformational
leadership are able to create an innovative, collaborative learning environment that
supports teachers' professional development. This article offers recommendations for the
development of school leadership in the context of international education.
Keywords
Abstract
This study aims to explore the role of transformational leadership in fostering a culture
of innovation in International Baccalaureate (IB) schools. Given the dynamic nature of
IB education, school leaders must continuously adapt and implement innovative strategies
to enhance teaching and learning. While existing research highlights the significance of
transformational leadership in various educational settings, its specific impact on
innovation within IB schools remains underexplored.
Using a mixed-method approach, this study collected data through surveys and in-depth
interviews with IB school leaders, teachers, and administrative staff. Quantitative data
were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM), while qualitative data were
examined through thematic analysis to identify key leadership practices that drive
innovation.
The novelty of this study lies in its comprehensive examination of the direct and
indirect mechanisms through which transformational leadership fosters innovation
within IB schools, bridging a gap in the literature on leadership and educational
transformation. Additionally, this research contributes to both theory and practice by
providing a framework for IB school leaders to cultivate an innovation-driven
environment, ultimately enhancing student learning outcomes and institutional
performance.
Introduction
However, many schools face challenges in implementing the IB curriculum, such as a lack of
support from management and difficulties in shifting the mindsets of teachers and
students. Therefore, transformational leadership becomes crucial in this change process.
This article aims to explore how principals can leverage transformational leadership styles
to build a school culture that aligns with the values of the IB curriculum.
Alternative:
Literature Review
By addressing these gaps, this study aims to examine how transformational leadership
fosters a culture of innovation in IB schools, identify key leadership practices, and
provide actionable recommendations for school leaders.
References
1. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology
Press.
2. Damanik, E., & Aldridge, J. M. (2017). Transformational leadership and its impact on
school climate and teachers’ self-efficacy in Indonesian secondary schools. Journal
of Educational Administration, 55(2), 256-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-
2015-0116
3. Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a Culture of Change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
4. Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational
Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5-24.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
5. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2021). Exploring the impact of principal leadership on
school innovation: A longitudinal study. Educational Management Administration &
Leadership, 49(5), 711-731. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220962107
6. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Teacher leadership and educational change. School
Leadership & Management, 39(2), 123-141.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1574964
7. Klar, H. W., & Brewer, C. A. (2013). Successful leadership in high-needs schools: An
examination of core leadership practices enacted in challenging contexts.
Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 768-808.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13482577
8. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership
research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177-199.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244769
9. Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Pollock, K. (2020). How School Leaders Contribute to Student
Success: The Four Paths Framework. Springer.
10. Litz, D., & Scott, S. (2017). Transformational leadership in education: A review of
existing literature. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management,
5(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2017.2435
11. Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Occupying the principal
position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social
network position, and innovation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623-
670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10380667
12. Scheerens, J. (2015). School Leadership Effects Revisited: Review and Meta-Analysis of
Empirical Studies. Springer.
13. Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. Educational Forum, 69(2), 143-150.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
14. Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015). Direction-setting school leadership practices: A
meta-analytic review of evidence about their influence. School Effectiveness and
School Improvement, 26(4), 499-523.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1005106
15. Walker, A., Bryant, D., & Lee, M. (2012). International patterns in principal
preparation: Commonalities and variations in pre-service programmes. Educational
Management Administration & Leadership, 40(5), 577-597.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212451178
Methods
Data collection was carried out in two phases: the first phase involved interviews with
principals and teachers to gain insights into transformational leadership; the second phase
included classroom observations and school activities to understand the culture that has
developed. Data analysis was performed using thematic analysis techniques, allowing the
researcher to identify key themes emerging from the data.
Alternative:
Methods
1. Research Design
Respondents included:
A purposive sampling technique was used to ensure the inclusion of leaders and
educators with at least three years of experience in IB schools.
All survey items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 =
strongly agree). Before distribution, the questionnaire was pilot tested with 10 IB
teachers, resulting in minor modifications to improve clarity.
4. Data Analysis
Survey data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS 26.0.
SEM was chosen because it allows for simultaneous examination of direct and indirect
relationships between transformational leadership, teacher collaboration, and
innovation (Byrne, 2016). The following statistical procedures were applied:
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to test the reliability and validity of the
measurement models.
Path Analysis to assess the direct and mediating effects of leadership on
innovation.
Goodness-of-Fit Tests (e.g., CFI, RMSEA, SRMR) to evaluate model adequacy.
Interview and focus group transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis, following
Braun & Clarke's (2006) six-step framework:
5. Ethical Considerations
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of [Affiliated
University], ensuring compliance with research ethics. Participants provided informed
consent, and confidentiality was maintained through anonymous data processing.
References
1. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and
Sampler Set (3rd ed.). Mind Garden.
2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative
Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
3. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts,
Applications, and Programming (3rd ed.). Routledge.
4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative,
and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
5. Olivier, D. F., Hipp, K. K., & Huffman, J. B. (2010). Assessing and analyzing schools as
professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 847-
856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.008
6. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model
of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3),
580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
Rev 3:
1. Results
Key Findings:
The SEM analysis confirmed that visionary leadership (β = 0.62, p < 0.001),
collaboration (β = 0.54, p < 0.001), risk-taking (β = 0.48, p < 0.001), and professional
development (β = 0.51, p < 0.001) had significant positive effects on fostering a culture of
innovation.
2. Discussion
The results align with existing literature on transformational leadership and innovation in
educational settings. Several studies confirm the relationship between transformational
leadership and a culture of innovation (Leithwood & Jantzi, 2006; Bass & Riggio, 2006; Day
et al., 2016). Specifically, research by Hallinger (2018) and Moolenaar et al. (2010)
highlights the role of visionary leadership in encouraging change and innovation in schools.
The study supports the findings of Sun et al. (2017), which emphasize the significance of
collaboration among teachers in promoting innovative teaching methods. Furthermore, the
role of professional development in sustaining innovation is consistent with the
conclusions drawn by Fullan (2014) and Hargreaves & O’Connor (2018). The study also
aligns with research by Robinson et al. (2018), demonstrating that risk-taking is a critical
factor in fostering an innovative school culture.
However, contradictory findings exist. Studies such as Spillane et al. (2004) and Harris &
Jones (2019) argue that distributed leadership, rather than transformational leadership,
plays a more significant role in fostering innovation. Additionally, research by Eyal & Kark
(2004) suggests that transformational leadership alone may not suffice in environments
with rigid administrative structures, limiting innovation potential.
(Insert SEM diagram here, showing the relationship between leadership factors and school
innovation)
3. Conclusion
The study provides strong evidence that transformational leadership fosters a culture of
innovation in IB schools through visionary leadership, collaboration, risk-taking, and
professional development. Future research could explore how these factors interact with
other leadership styles to further enhance educational innovation.
Results and Discussion
1. The Role of Principals in Building Vision: School principals play a crucial role in
establishing and communicating a clear vision related to the implementation of the
International Baccalaureate (IB) curriculum (Vermeulen, Kreijns, & Evers, 2022).
This is realized by principals through training that involves IB trainers. Principals
not only impart knowledge but also build teachers' confidence in implementing the
new curriculum. This training enables teachers to better understand the
fundamental principles of the IB, as well as provide them with the practical skills
necessary to support students in the learning process. Thus, principals act as a
bridge between broader educational philosophy and everyday classroom practices.
The school’s vision and mission serve as a foundation that must be understood by
all stakeholders. The principal emphasizes that the vision, "Our school exists to
provide excellent educational experiences centered on a biblical worldview to build
world-transforming generations with Character, Faith, and Wisdom," is not just a
slogan but a guiding principle in every aspect of education, including the
implementation of the IB curriculum. By integrating the values embedded in this
vision into the IB curriculum, the principal ensures that learning focuses not only on
academics but also on character development for students.
On the other hand, the principal also recognizes that the transition to the IB
curriculum requires careful preparation. This aligns with the explanation that the
preparatory process related to the program is a fundamental task that embodies
transformational leadership characteristics (Berkovich & Eyal, 2021). Through a
series of training sessions, the principal helps teachers understand the fundamental
differences between the IB curriculum and the previous curriculum. This includes
an emphasis on a more holistic and inquiry-based learning approach, which is a
hallmark of the IB curriculum. By providing deep understanding, the principal
ensures that all teachers feel prepared to adopt the new curriculum and understand
the best ways to implement it in the classrooms.
2. Professional Development for Teachers: The principal plays a crucial role in the
professional development of teachers, especially in supporting the implementation
of the International Baccalaureate (IB) curriculum. (Lamirin et al., 2023). By
providing training guided by certified IB trainers, the principal ensures that
teachers gain a deep understanding of the IB learning philosophy. This training
focuses not only on theory but also on relevant practices, allowing teachers to
immediately apply their new knowledge in the teaching and learning process. In this
way, teachers become more prepared and confident in integrating the IB approach
into their instruction.
To ensure that this professional development has a positive impact, the principal
conducts scheduled supervision to observe the implementation of learning in the
classroom. Through this supervision, the principal can directly see how teachers
apply IB principles and provide constructive feedback. Supervision also includes
observing areas of student inquiry and the application of learning processes that
align with IB philosophy. With this approach, the principal can offer the necessary
support to teachers to enhance their teaching practices moving forward, allowing
the entire teaching team to contribute maximally to the implementation of the IB
curriculum.
In the second IB school, a similar approach is applied with a more structured inquiry
method. Students initiate their learning activities using the K (Know), W (Want to
know), and L (Learned) formats. This format helps students articulate their initial
understanding and establish questions they wish to answer during the learning
process. In this way, students are not just recipients of information but also active
participants in designing their own learning experiences. This fosters curiosity and
motivation to explore deeper.
Technology serves as a tool for accessing information and as a means for students to
express their understanding (Mertasari & Candiasa, 2022). Through various
creative projects, such as poster creation, campaigns, and short videos, students are
given the opportunity to apply the knowledge they have gained in engaging and
innovative ways. This process not only reinforces their understanding of the
material but also enhances their communication and collaboration skills, which are
vital in the modern world.
With technology as part of the IB curriculum, the learning process becomes more
interactive and engaging. Students are not just recipients of information; they
become active participants in the learning process. By technology, they can delve
deeper, analyze, and present their ideas creatively. Thus, the integration of
technology not only supports academic understanding but also prepares students to
face challenges in an increasingly digital and connected world.
Additionally, challenges also arise from the human resources side, particularly
among teachers. Many teachers may struggle when introduced to new concepts in
IB-based learning, which can lead to resistance, especially from those with a fixed
mindset. Some teachers may feel it unnecessary to adapt to new learning processes,
thus hindering the effective implementation of the curriculum. To address these
challenges, it is crucial for schools to implement comprehensive training programs
and provide ongoing support to teachers so that they feel comfortable with the
necessary changes.
A strong desire to learn not only boosts motivation but also positively impacts
students' academic performance (Normianti & Aslamiah, 2019). When students are
enthusiastic about exploration, they are more likely to actively seek information and
articulate their findings. This process encourages them to conduct research, engage
in discussions with peers, and collaborate with teachers, all of which contribute to a
deeper understanding. Consequently, students' performance in terms of content
mastery and analytical skills also increases significantly.
Next, building collaborative networks among schools can be a powerful strategy for
sharing best practices and resources. By creating forums where principals and
teachers can exchange ideas and experiences, educational institutions can learn
from one another. This not only enriches educational practices but also creates a
broader learning community. With support from peers, educational leaders will be
better prepared to face challenges and implement necessary changes in the
curriculum.
The next recommendation is to enhance communication with all stakeholders,
including students, parents, and the community. Establishing clear and open
communication channels can help foster a sense of ownership among all parties
involved in education. By involving stakeholders in the decision-making process,
schools can be more responsive to their needs and expectations. This will also help
create an inclusive culture that facilitates collaboration and support throughout the
school community.
1. Results
2. Discussion
Supporting Evidence:
o Leithwood & Jantzi (2006) demonstrated that transformational
leadership enhances teacher motivation and instructional
creativity.
o Moolenaar et al. (2010) found that collaborative school
environments—driven by strong leadership—stimulate
innovation.
o Damanpour & Aravind (2012) highlighted that leaders who
embrace change and risk-taking facilitate organizational
innovation.
o Harris & Jones (2019) argued that leaders who integrate
professional development into school culture enhance
innovation capacity.
Supporting Evidence:
o Yukl (2013) stated that effective leaders encourage risk-taking
by creating a psychologically safe environment.
o Korthagen (2017) found that leaders who promote reflective
teaching and experimentation enhance teacher creativity.
Supporting Evidence:
o Hargreaves & Fullan (2012) emphasized that sustained
professional learning leads to innovative teaching.
o Robinson et al. (2008) found that leadership that prioritizes
teacher learning contributes to student achievement and school
innovation.
o Harris & Jones (2019) confirmed that CPD is a major driver of
instructional improvement and school innovation.
References
Conclusion
References
Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2021). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and
moral reasoning. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 20(2), 131–148.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1585551
Cobanoglu, N. (2021). The relationship between the transformational leadership, the
cultural intelligence of teachers and the skills of principals’ diversity management.
European Journal of Educational Management, 1(4), 35–49.
https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.4.1.35
Dickson, A., Perry, L. B., & Ledger, S. (2018). Impacts of International Baccalaureate
programmes on teaching and learning: A review of the literature. Journal of Research
in International Education, 17(3), 240–261.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240918815801
Dr. Shaikhah J. Alainati, Dr. Nouf S. Almonawer, & Dr. Faisal A. Al-Hammad. (2023).
Transformational leadership in education: Review of literature. The International
Journal of Business & Management, (April).
https://doi.org/10.24940/theijbm/2023/v11/i2/bm2302-016
Effendi, Y. R., Bafadal, I., Sudana, I. N. D., & Arifin, I. (2020). The principal transformational
leadership strategy in developing national policies for strengthening character
education in Eastern Indonesia. Acción Pedagógica, 12(2), 51–78.
https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2020-2-3ï
Farras, M. F., Hadian, D., & Hardiyana, A. (2024). The influence of transformational
leadership and organizational culture on employee performance (study of one the
companies operating in the field of publishing and book trading in the city of
Bandung). Acman: Accounting and Management Journal, 4(1), 20–28.
https://doi.org/10.55208/aj
Gordon, S. P., & McGhee, M. W. (2019). The power of formative evaluation of teaching. In
Differentiated Teacher Evaluation and Professional Learning (hal. 15–35).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16454-6_2
Idris, J. (2021). Determination of School Leaders’ Values, Their Levels of Practice and
Differences. In Proceedings of The 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research
in Education, Teaching and Learning (hal. 85–91).
https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.aretl.2020.12.115
Khan, M. A., Ismail, F. B., Hussain, A., & Alghazali, B. (2020). The Interplay of Leadership
Styles, Innovative Work Behavior, Organizational Culture, and Organizational
Citizenship Behavior. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019898264
Khumalo, S. S. (2019). The role of transformational school leadership in promoting teacher
commitment: An antecedent for sustainable development in south africa. Discourse
and Communication for Sustainable Education, 10(2), 22–32.
https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2019-0015
Lamirin, Santoso, J., & Selwen, P. (2023). Penerapan Strategi Kepemimpinan
Transformasional dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Organisasi Pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmiah
Kanderang Tingang, 14(2), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v14i2.259
Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2020). Leadership,
creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and
Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 1–35.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1661837
Lim, Y. (2022). International Baccalaureate curriculum content framework analysis :
Focusing on IB PYP. Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 25(2), 59–87.
https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2022.25.2.59
Lochmiller, C. R., Lucero, A., & Lester, J. N. (2016). Challenges for a new bilingual program:
Implementing the International Baccalaureate Primary Years Programme in four
Colombian schools. Journal of Research in International Education, 15(2), 155–174.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240916660803
Mertasari, N. M. S., & Candiasa, I. M. (2022). Formative evaluation of digital learning
materials. Journal of Education Technology, 6(3), 507–514.
https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i3.44165
Normianti, H., & Aslamiah, S. (2019). Relationship of transformational leaders of principal,
teacher motivation, teacher organization commitments with performance of primary
school teachers in Labuan Amas Selatan, Indonesia. European Journal of Education
Studies, 5(11), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2583734
Pano, N., & Gjika, I. (2020). Fostering students entrepreneurship through digital platforms.
Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 3179–3188.
https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080747
Poturak, M., Mekić, E., Hadžiahmetović, N., & Budur, T. (2020). Effectiveness of
transformational leadership among different cultures. International Journal of Social
Sciences and Educational Studies, 7(3), 120–129.
https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v7i3p119
Putro, H. C., Akhyak, & Sujianto, A. E. (2023). Transformational leadership: A strategy for
building the image of elementary education institutions. International Journal of
Educational Studies in Social Sciences, 3(2), 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.53402/ijesss.v3i2.306
Sasan, J. M., Escultor, G. R., & Larsari, V. N. (2023). The impact of transformational
leadership on school culture. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(8),
1899–1907. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i8.334
Su, Y. S., Zheng, Z. X., & Chen, J. (2018). A multi-platform collaboration innovation
ecosystem: the case of China. Management Decision, 56(1), 1–28.
https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0386
Suaco, T. P., Mangaliag, A. D., & Gadgad, M. M. (2023). Collaborative summative assessment:
Means for enduring learning and attainment of 21st century skills in the online
platform. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(1), 118.
https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n1p118
Torres, L. L. (2022). School Organizational Culture and Leadership: Theoretical Trends and
New Analytical Proposals. Education Sciences, 12(4).
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040254
Vermeulen, M., Kreijns, K., & Evers, A. T. (2022). Transformational leadership, leader–
member exchange and school learning climate: Impact on teachers’ innovative
behaviour in the Netherlands. Educational Management Administration and
Leadership, 50(3), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220932582
Yin, J. (2024). Cultural leadership and cultural intelligence level of school administrators
towards a culturally responsive leadership action program. International Journal of
Education and Humanities, 12(1), 119–121. https://doi.org/10.54097/4f5ch620
Yussef Itani, L., & Freiha, N. (2023). Transformational Leaders’ Idealized Influence: A
Communicative Approach to Leadership in Lebanon’s IB World Schools. Middle
Eastern Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 3(4), 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.47631/mejress.v3i4.555