Native American Mascot Report
Native American Mascot Report
Native American Mascot Report
Report
to the
March 8, 2012
EXECUTIVESUMMARY
InOregon,fifteenhighschoolshaveAmericanIndianmascotstheseracebasednicknamesare theWarriors,theBraves,theChieftains,theIndians,ortheIndianEagles.Inall cases,theschoolsandcommunitiesbelievetheyarerespectfullyhonoringNativeAmericans.To suggestthatsuchimagesmaybeoffensiveriskscommunityoutrage:communitymembers believetheyareunfairlybeingchargedwithbeingdisrespectfulorracist.Theverytopicinvites passiononbothsidesandisdivisive. WhilethecommunitiesofthesehighschoolsbelievetheyarehonoringNativeAmericans,there isagrowingbodyofsocialscienceliteratureandempiricalresearchthatindicatesthereare harmfuleffectsofsuchracialstereotypingandinaccurateracialportrayals.Thesestereotypes areparticularlyharmfultothesocialidentitydevelopmentandselfesteemofAmericanIndian youngpeople.ResearchindicatesthatusingNativeAmericansasmascotspromotes discrimination,pupilharassment,andstereotyping. TheOregonStateBoardofEducationhasbeengiventheresponsibilitybytheOregon Legislatureinstatestatutetoensurethatpersonsarenotsubjectedtounlawfuldiscrimination inourpublicschoolsonthebasisofrace,color,religion,sex,sexualorientation,nationalorigin, maritalstatus,ageordisability.NativeAmericanstudentsarealsoentitledtoaneducational environmentthatisnothostileandisconducivetotheattainmentofeducationalgoals.The boardhasaresponsibilitytoconsidertheresearchandweighthisagainstthecommunitys desiretomaintainitstraditions. Sincethe1970s,20OregonhighschoolshavechangedtheirIndianrelatednicknamesand mascots.OregonscommunitycollegesanduniversitieshavediscontinuedtheuseofIndian mascots.TheOregoniandoesnotprintnamessuchastheBraves,Redskins,andRedmen. SuperintendentCastillorecommendstheboardthoughtfullyconsidertheissuefromall perspectives.Ideally,theseconversationswouldoccuratthecommunitylevel,buttraditions andthepassiontheyevokecanmakethisdifficult. Recommendations: 1. Adoptaresolutiontobedistributedtopublicschoolsthatdescribestheissuesrelatingto NativeAmericanmascots. 2. Adoptanadministrativerulethatprohibitspublicschoolsfromusingnames,symbolsor imagesthatdepictorrefertoanAmericanIndianTribe,custom,ortraditionasamascot, nickname,logo,orteamname. 3. Tomitigatecostsandtoallowdistrictsadequatetimetoadoptnewmascots,allowpublic schoolsfiveyearstocompletethemascotadoptionprocess. 4. Giveschooldistrictsfreedomtousetheirownprocessestoselectandadoptnewmascots.
Page3
INTRODUCTION
SchoolsbeganusingNativeAmericannamesandimagesbetweenthe1930sandthe1950s. Manyofthefirstmascotswerecartoonishcaricaturesthathaveevolvedintomoredignified depictions.However,sincetheearly1970s,therehasbeenamovementtoeliminateNative Americanteamnames,mascots,andlogosaltogether. ResearchsupportsthatusingaNativeAmericanasamascotpromotesdiscrimination.The AmericanPsychologicalAssociation(APA)1hascalledfortheretirementofallAmericanIndian mascots,symbols,images,andpersonalitiesbyschools,colleges,universities,athleticteamsand organizations.TheAmericanSociologicalAssociationhascalledfortheeliminationoftheuseof NativeAmericannicknames,logos,andmascotsinsports.Manynewspaperswillnotprintthe nameofsuchmascots,includingTheOregonian.TheNationalCollegiateAthleticAssociation stoppedrecognizingIndianmascotsin1998.Anumberoforganizationshavecalledonschools withIndianmascotstodiscontinuetheiruse. WhatAbouttheVikings?TheCeltics?TheFightingIrish? OnequestionthatfrequentlyarisesindiscussionsofeliminatingNativeAmericanmascotsis whethermascotsaredifferentfromotherethnicallybasedmascots.Akeydifferenceisthat NativeAmericansrepresentaraceofpeople,notanethnicorpoliticalsubgroupofarace,such astheSpartans.2 Thehistoricalexperiences,status,andpoliticalpowerthatcanbeattributedtoAmericanIndian peopleversusindividualsofEuropeandescentarealsovastlydifferent.Irishand Scandinavians,forinstance,areofEuropeanheritageandpartofthenumericallylarge, dominatewhiteAmericansociety.Moreover,IrishAmericansarethesecondlargestsubgroup inthecountryandtherearemoreAmericansofIrishdescentthanthereareIrishinIreland. ThesamecannotbesaidforAmericanIndianpeoplewhobelongtoahistoricallypersecuted, disenfranchisedgroupwhosetotalnumberscomposelessthanonepercentofthenational population.3
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html
Page4
Page5
USEOFINDIANMASCOTSINOREGON
InAprilof2006,OregonIndianEducationAssociation(OIEA)adoptedaresolutiontobanthe useofallNativeAmericanmascotsforsportsevents.Thisresolutionsupportedactionalready takenbytheNationalCongressofAmericanIndiansandNationalYouthCouncil. InDecember2006,CheButler,accompaniedbyhissisterLuhuiWhitebear(bothmembersofthe SiletztribeandmembersofOIEA),testified5beforetheStateBoardofEducation.CheButler presentedargumentsinsupportoftheOIEAresolutionanddescribedanumberofincidentshe founddisturbingconcerningschoolsuseofNativeAmericanmascots: InIllinois,Nativedollswerehungfromtreesandbalconieswhenarivalteamwitha Nativemascotwasintown. InArizona,ScalptheIndianswaschalkedinlargelettersonthelawnwhenarival teamwithaNativemascotwasintown. InSouthDakotastudentswearTheSiouxSuckshirtsandchantthissayingwhile playingarivalteamwithaNativemascot. TheNewYorkPosthasheadlinessuchasTribeonWarpathandTaketheTribeand ScalpEmwhentheNYYankeesplaytheClevelandIndians. HighschoolspostScalptheIndianswhenplayingrivalteams. Oftenthedisrespectofthemascotcomesnot fromthestudentsandstaffataschoolthathas adoptedthemascot,butteamscompeting againsttheschool. Mr.Butlerpointedoutthatnativepeopleare theonlyraceoflivingpeopleusedasmascots inprofessionalsports.Henotedthatnoneof theseotherimages(right)wouldbeseenas acceptablebythepublic. Mr.Butlerurgedtheboardtoexaminethe
Fryberg,Stephanie,etal.OfWarriorChiefsandIndianPrincesses:ThePsychologicalConsequencesofIndianMascots. BasicandAppliedSocialPsychology.2008. http://sitemaker.umich.edu/daphna.oyserman/files/frybergmarkusoysermanstone2008.pdf 5Manyoftheslideshavebeenusedinthispaper.ToseethecompletepresentationscrolltoSchoolMascotsC. Butler),http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=846
4
Page6
NATIVEAMERICANMASCOTS&IMAGERYINOREGON&OREGONSCHOOLS
NopubliccollegesoruniversitiesinOregonuseNativeAmericansasmascots. In1980,SouthernOregonUniversityendedatraditionbegunin1950whenitsmascots,theRed Raiders,weredepictedasIndianchiefs.SOUchangedtheirmascotnametotheRaiders,anda nativebirdsymbolwasused.6
Page7
Page8
NATIONALPERSPECTIVE
In2001,theUnitedStatesCommissiononCivilRightscalledforanendtotheuseofNative AmericanimagesandteamnamesbynonNativeschools.TheCommissionconcludedthat [t]hesereferences,whethermascotsandtheirperformances,logos,ornames,aredisrespectful andoffensivetoAmericanIndiansandotherswhoareoffendedbysuchstereotypingandare particularlyinappropriateandinsensitiveinlightofthelonghistoryofforcedassimilationthat AmericanIndianpeoplehaveenduredinthiscountry.13 Sincetheearly1970s,morethan600highschooland collegeteamshavestoppedusingNativeAmericanteam "Thisisahumanrightsissue;weare beingdeniedthemostbasicrespect.As namesormascots,thoughnoprofessionalsportsteamin longasourpeopleareperceivedas theUnitedStateshasfollowedsuit.Thereareatleast117 cartooncharactersorstaticbeingslocked AmericanIndian,educational,psychological,sociological, inthepast,oursocioeconomicproblems civilrightsandreligiousorganizationsthatareofficially willneverbeseriouslyaddressed.Also, opposedtoracebasedathleticnicknamesormascots.14 thisissueofimageryhasadirect correlationwithviolenceagainstIndian peopleandthehighsuiciderateofour AbandoningtheuseofIndianmascotscontinuesthe youth." recognitionthatsuchimageryandnamesareoffensive.In MichaelS.Haney(Seminole) 2005,theNCAAprohibitedthedisplayofhostileand abusiveracial/ethnic/nationaloriginmascots,nicknamesorimageryatanyofthe88NCAA championshipsandthefollowingyear,prohibitedschoolswithhostileorabusivemascots, nicknamesorimageryfromhostinganyNCAAchampionshipcompetitions.15 InMay,2010,WisconsinenactedAct250.Underthislaw,schooldistrictboardshavethe burdenofprovingbyclearandconvincingevidencethattheuseofthenicknameorteamname inconnectionwiththelogoormascotdoesnotpromotediscrimination,pupilharassment,or stereotypingasdefinedbythestatesuperintendentbyrule.16
16
http://indianmascots.com/position_statement/position_statement.htm
Page9
PSYCHOLOGICALEFFECTONSTUDENTS
ResearchoverwhelminglysupportsthatusingaNativeAmericanasamascotpromotes discrimination;theuseofamascotpromotesharassment;andtheuseofamascotpromotes stereotyping.
http://www.gcorr.org/site/c.mwKWJ9NTJtF/b.3416631/k.5ABB/Native_American_Mascots.htm http://www.und.edu/org/bridges/nccj.html 19http://www.ucc.org/justice/racism/negativestereotyping.html 20http://aistm.org/american_jewish_committee.htm
17 18
Page10
21
ThispageisareprintoftheAPApositionfoundat:http://www.apa.org/pi/oema/resources/indianmascots.aspx
Page11
22 23
http://sitemaker.umich.edu/daphna.oyserman/files/frybergmarkusoysermanstone2008.pdf
http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/PublicHealth/research/centers/CAIANH/journal/Documents/Volume %2018/18(1)_Chaney_AI_Mascots_People_new.pdf
Page13
POLICIESTHATSUPPORTABANOFNATIVEAMERICANMASCOTS
In1964,CongresspassedtheCivilRightsAct.TheU.S.DepartmentofEducationstates,Title VIoftheCivilRightsActof1964prohibitsdiscriminationbasedonrace,color,ornational origininprogramsoractivitiesreceivingfederalfinancialassistance.Allfederalagenciesthat providedgrantsofassistancearerequiredtoenforcetheTitleVIregulation.Accordingto WisconsinsThePupilNondiscriminationGuidelinesforAthletics,Discussionsofrace discriminationinathleticshave,mostrecently,centeredontheuseofAmericanIndianlogos, nicknames,symbols,andimages.Underfederallaw,mostcomplaintsallegethatAmerican IndianmascotsandlogosviolateTitleVIoftheCivilRightsActof1963.24 AsreportedintheConnecticutLawReview,InMarchof1994,theU.S.DepartmentofEducation adoptedguidelinesallowingittowithholdfundsfromaschoolthatmaintainsahostile environment.ThisregulationwouldtheoreticallyallowtheDOEtowithholdfundsfroma schoolwhoseNativeAmericanmascotcreatedahostileenvironment.Applicationofthe regulationispremisedontheideathataschoolsuseofNativeAmericannamesorimagery couldsignalthattheschoolimplicitlyorexplicitlyendorsesraciallyharassingconduct. Therefore,enforcementunderthehostileenvironmentstandardwouldlookatwhetherthe
Page14
LEGALAUTHORITY
ThereisnotcurrentlyanOregonstatuteorrulethatspecificallyaddressesmascotsinpublic schools.However,thelegalauthorityfortheStateBoardofEducationandschooldistrictsto takeactiontoprohibitNativeAmericanMascotsiswellsupportedbyseveralstatelaws. StateBoardauthoritytoadoptrules: TheStateBoardofEducationisdirectedbystatelawtoestablishpoliciesfortheadministration andoperationofOregonspublicelementaryandsecondaryschools.25Theboardalsohasbroad authoritytoadoptrulesforthegeneralgovernanceofOregonspublicschools.26Theadoption ofrulesprohibitingorregulatingtheuseofanytypeofmascot,includingNativeAmerican mascots,ispursuanttothisstatutorygrantofauthority. Statelawalsoprohibitsdiscriminationinpublicschoolsthatunreasonablydifferentiates treatment,intendedorunintended,oranyactthatisfairinformbutdiscriminatoryin operation,eitherofwhichisbasedonrace,color,religion,sex,sexualorientation,national origin,maritalstatus,ageordisability.27TheStateBoardisspecificallydirectedtoestablish rulesnecessarytoensurecompliancewithOregonsnondiscriminationlaws.28Theadoptionof rulesprohibitingorregulatingtheuseofracebasedmascots,includingNativeAmerican mascots,alsoispursuanttothisstatutorydirective. Schooldistrictresponsibilities: Inadditiontothestatutoryprohibitionsonschooldistrictsrelatingtodiscrimination: (1)TheLegislativeAssemblyhasfoundthat: (a)Asafeandcivilenvironmentisnecessaryforstudentstolearnandachievehighacademic standards. (b)Harassment,intimidationorbullyingandcyberbullying,likeotherdisruptiveorviolentbehavior, areconductthatdisruptsastudentsabilitytolearnandaschoolsabilitytoeducateitsstudentsinasafe
ORS326.011. ORS326.051. 27ORS659.850(1). 28ORS659.850(3).
25 26
Page15
Page16
COSTSTOSCHOOLDISTRICTS
Therearearangeofcoststhatareassociatedwithchangingaschoolmascot.Itisdifficultto identifyacostforeachdistrictatthestatelevelasthesecostswillvarywidelyfromdistrictto district.Mascotstypicallyappearinschoolsinavarietyofplacessuchasgymnasiums, uniforms,trophycases,signs,schoolnewspapers,andwebsites.Formanyschoolsthemascotis notprominent.Areviewoftypicalschooluniformsindicatedthatmanyschooluniformsdonot includethemascotimage,teamname,orboth. In2007,RoseburgPublicSchoolsSuperintendentLeePatersonpresentedacostestimatetothe NativeAmericanMascotAdvisoryCommitteeof$345,650ifRoseburgHighSchoolchangedits nicknamefromtheIndians.Todate,Roseburghaschangeditsmascottothefeatherbuthasnot changeditsnicknamefromtheIndians.Itisuncertainifthecostpresentedin2007alsoincluded thecostofchangingtothefeather.Additionally,Roseburgisthelargestoftheschoolsthat currentlyhaveNativeAmericanmascots.Itisanticipatedthatsmallerschoolswillhavefewer mascotimagesandthereforethecostsofreplacementwillbeless. Forexample,EnterpriseschooldistrictchangedtheirmascotfromtheSavagestotheOutlaws. Thedistrictindicatesthatthecostofthischangewas$15,000to$20,000.Thedistrictindicates thatthechangetookmorethansixyearsandincludedthestudentbodychoosinganewmascot. Somespecificcostsidentifiedbyotherdistrictsare: Gymnasiumtotalresurfacing:$30,000to$40,000 Schooluniforms:$60to$150 Schoollogoredesign:$0to$20,000
32
ORS 339.351
Page17
RECOMMENDATION
ThediscontinueduseofNativeAmericanmascotsdoesnotalsodiscontinuetheinclusionof NativeAmericanhistory,language,andcultureinschoolcurriculum.Forexample,themost recentsocialscienceacademiccontentstandardsadoptedbytheStateBoardofEducationon August15,2011includeNativeAmericanhistoryandculture.33Oregonlawalsospecifically encouragesandallowsfortheteachingofAmericanIndianlanguagesinpublicschools.34 TheOregonStateBoardofEducationhasbeengiventheresponsibilitybytheOregon Legislatureinstatestatutetoensurethatpersonsarenotsubjectedtounlawfuldiscrimination inourpublicschoolsonthebasisofrace,color,religion,sex,sexualorientation,nationalorigin, maritalstatus,ageordisability.TheboardhasanobligationtoensurethatNativeAmerican studentsarenotsubjectedtodiscriminationthatunreasonablydifferentiatestreatment, intendedorunintended,oranyactthatisfairinformbutdiscriminatoryinoperationbasedon race.NativeAmericanstudentsarealsoentitledtoaneducationalenvironmentthatisnot hostileandisratherconducivetoattainmentofeducationalgoals.Basedonnationalresearch andthestoriesofindividualNativeAmericans,theSuperintendentconcludesthatthe
33 34
http://www.ode.state.or.us/teachlearn/subjects/socialscience/standards/adoptedsocialsciencesstandards82011.pdf ORS342.144
Page18
CONCLUSION
ThereexistsanextensivebodyofknowledgeandcredibleresearchthatNativeAmerican symbolsasmascots,logos,andteamnamespromotestereotypingandpupilharassment;little ornocredibleevidenceexiststhatcontradictssuchevidence. ThereasonableresponseoftheOregonStateBoardofEducation,whohasbeengiventhe responsibilitybytheOregonLegislatureinstatestatutetoensurethatpersonsarenotsubjected tounlawfuldiscriminationinourpublicschoolsonthebasisofrace,color,religion,sex,sexual orientation,nationalorigin,maritalstatus,ageordisabilityistoadoptaresolutionor Page19
Page20
Most items of timeline (1968-2002) retrieved on July 5, 2011 from Chronology, American Indian Sports Team Mascots,www.aistm.org
Page21
Years 1998
Retrieved on August 31, 2011 from http://www.usccr.gov/press/archives/2001/041601st.htm Retrieved on August 31, 2011 from http://www.und.edu/org/bridges/itcfct.html
Page22
2007
2010
2011
Page23
Year
2003
Mechanism
Resolution
Proposal
TostronglyrecommendeliminationofAmericanIndian mascots,nicknames,logos,fightsongs,insignias,antics, andteamdescriptorsbyallMichiganschools,byState BoardofEducation Torequestthatallinstitutionshaltuseofracebased symbolsandmascots42 TostudyuseofAmericanIndianMascotsatpublic schools43 TodiscontinueuseofNativeAmericanIndianmascotsin StateofTennessee44 Toallowforresidentstofilecomplaintsforuseofrace basedname,nickname,logo,ormascotbyfiling complaintwithstatesuperintendentofpublic instruction45 TobanNativeAmericanteammascotsfrompublic schoolswasdefeated46 TorequireallColoradoprimarypublicschoolsand charterswithNativeAmericanmascotsgetapprovalfrom stateCommissionofIndianAffairs,changemascotby 2013orface$1,000monthlyfine47 Toprohibituseofraciallyderogatoryordiscriminatory schoolorathleticteamnames,mascots,ornicknamesby OklahomaPublicSchools48
Outcome
Passed
Nebraska
1999
2011 2005
Passed
Passed Passed
Wisconsin
2010
Passed
California Colorado
2002 2010
AB2115 SB10107
Oklahoma
2009
Pending authorship
ResolutionoftheNebraskaCommissiononIndianAffairs,Res.#992,retrievedonAugust31,2011from http://www.aistm.org/nebres.htm 43StudyofAmericanIndianMascotsatSchools,retrievedonAugust31,2011from http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2011/Bills/House/PDF/H681v1.pdf 44ResolutionfortheDiscontinuationofNativeAmericanIndianMascotsintheStateofTennessee,retrievedonAugust31,2011from http://www.tncia.org/mascots.html 452009WisconsinAct250,enactedMay5,2010;retrievedonAugust31,2011from http://indianmascots.com/documents/Act%20250%20%20Web.pdf 46BillNumber:AB2115Amended,retrievedonAugust31,2011fromftp://leginfo.public.ca.gov/pub/0102/bill/asm/ab_2101 2150/ab_2115_bill_20020501_amended_asm.html 47Mascots,retrievedonAugust31,2011from http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhe re=1251683620430&ssbinary=true 48BillTrackingReports,retrievedonAugust31,2011fromhttp://newlsb.lsb.state.ok.us/advancedsearchform.aspx
42
Page24
Mascot
Page25
Mascot
9. ReedsportBraves Mission:Notfoundonline
10. RogueRiverChieftains: Mission/Vision:ThemissionofRogueRiverHighSchoolisto provideasafe,positiveatmospherewhereindividualsareinspired, accepted,supported,andchallengedinanengaging,creative environment.StaffandStudentswillberespectedandheld accountableforimprovingourcommunitywhilebeingencouraged totakeownershipofalleducationalexperiences. 11. RoseburgIndians Mission/Vision:ThemissionofDouglasCountySchoolDistrict4, anorganizationcommittedtoservingadiversestudentpopulation undergoingsignificantsocialandeconomictransition,istoprepare youthtoconfidently,responsiblyandcreativelycontributetoa changingglobalsocietybyprovidingallstudentsapersonalized andappropriateeducationsupportedbymeaningfulschool communitypartnerships. Page26
Mascot
Page27
Page28
Page31
Page32
Page33
Eagle and Condor Indigenous Peoples Alliance (2003). Resolution by the Eagle and Condor Indigenous Peoples Alliance on Eliminating Native American Indian Descriptions Naming Mascots, Logos, and Sports Team Nicknames in Oklahoma Public Schools. [Available On-line: http://www.aistm.org/2003ecipa.htm.] Fryberg, S. A. (June, 2003). Free to be me? The impact of using American Indians as mascosts. Invited address at the 16th Annual Convention of American Indian Psychologists and Psychology Graduate Students, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Fryberg, S. A. & Markus, H. R. (2003). On being American Indian: Current and possible selves. Journal of Self and Identity, 2, 325-344. Fryberg, S. A. (November, 2004a). Dude, Im honoring you: The impact of using American Indian mascots. Invited address at the North American Society for Sociology of Sports, Tucson, Arizona. Fryberg, S. A. (June, 2004b). American Indian social representations: Do they honor or constrain identities? Invited address at the Mellon Humanities Center Workshop/Research Institute for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity network, How do identities matter? Stanford University, Stanford, California. Gone, J. P. (2002). Chief Illiniwek: Dignified or damaging? In T. Straus (Ed.), Native Chicago (2nd ed., pp. 274-286). Chicago, IL: Albatross. Inter-Tribal Council of the Five Civilized Tribes (2001). The Five Civilized Tribes Intertribal Council Mascot Resolution. [Available On-line at: http://aistm.org/2001.civilized.tribes.htm.] King, C. R. (2001). Uneasy Indians: Creating and contesting Native American mascots at Marquette University. In C.R. King & C. F. Springwood (Eds.). Team spirits: Essays on the history and significance of Native American mascots (pp. 281-303). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. King, C.R., & Springwood, C.F. (2001). Beyond the cheers: Race as spectacle in college sports. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs (2001). Resolution of the Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs. [Available Online at: http://aistm.org/maryland.resolution.2001.htm.] Munson, B. (2001). Tolerance in the news. [Available On-line at: http://www.tolerance.org/news/article_tol.jsp?id=169.] Nuessel, F. (1994). Objectionable sports team designations. Names: A Journal of Onomastics 42, 101-119. Pewewardy, C. D. (1991). Native American mascots and imagery: The struggle of unlearning Indian stereotypes. Journal of Navaho Education, 9(1), 19-23. Rodriquez, R. (1998). Plotting the assassination of Little Red Sambo: Psychologists join war against racist campus mascots. Black Issues in Higher Education, 15(8), 20-24. Sheppard, H. Assembly: No redskins---Ban on name advances to Senate. Los Angeles Daily, 2004 [Available On-line at: http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20954~1923795,00.] Society of Indian Psychologist (1999). Position statement in support of retiring all Indian personalities as the official symbols and mascots of universities, colleges, or schools (and athletic teams). [Available On-line at: http://www.aics.org/mascot/society.html.] Springwood, C. F. & King, C. R. (2000). Race, power, and representation in contemporary American sport. In P. Kivisto & G. Rundblad (Eds.), The color line at the dawn of the 21st century (pp. 61-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Valley Press.
Page34
Staurowsky, E. (1999). American Indian imagery and the miseducation of America. Quest, 51 (4), 382 392. [Available Online at: http://www.aistm.org/staurowsky.miseducation.htm.] Staurowsky, E. (1998). An Act of Honor or Exploitation?: The Cleveland Indians Use of the Louis Francis Socalexis Story. Sociology of Sports Journal, 15, 299 316. U. S. Commission on Civil Rights (April 13, 2001). Statement of U.S. Commission on Civil Rights on the use of Native American images and nicknames as sports mascots. [Available On-line: http://www.aics.org/mascot/civilrights.html.] Vanderford, H. (1996). Whats in a name? Heritage or hatred: The school mascot controversy. Journal of Law and Education, 25, 381-388. Webster, S. Loudbear, P., Corn, D., & Vigue, B. (1971, February 17). Four MU Indian students describe Willie Wampum as racist symbol. The Marquette Tribune, p. A9. Witko, T. (2005). In whose honor: Understanding the psychological implications of American Indian mascots. California Psychologist, January Issue.
Page35
Page36
Page37
In 1981, Blake Carlsen graduated from Enterprise High School, fiercely proud of being an Enterprise ... Well, we're not going to say what he was. The school's nickname 31 years ago is still deeply offensive to Native Americans. In 1992, The Oregonian was among the first newspapers in the country to stop publishing "sports team nicknames, logos or mascots widely considered to dehumanize minority groups." Today, Carlsen is principal of Enterprise High, proud home -- and we have no trouble saying this one -- of the Enterprise Outlaws. Although that change happened seven years ago, for some in the community, embers of anger still glow. Indeed, some Enterprise residents will go to their graves feeling a part of their identity was yanked away. Carlsen is in as good a position as anyone to advise other principals about how turbulent a name change can be. But, he notes, it's really the adults who are still smarting. The kids? "The kids made the transition just fine from one name to the other," the principal says. "They just want to have spirit for their team." Admittedly, what increased acceptance of this change is that Enterprise students themselves originated it. The student body voted for it. They own it. There's an important lesson in this for the many schools around the state that are still hesitating. Deep down, surely, they know they should have changed their names and logos long ago. They can start by naming a student task force to examine the issue. Then bring in tribal and other community speakers to debate it and illuminate it. Many people just aren't aware of the racism and the painful history -- involving near-destruction of some Native American tribes -- casually embedded in such hurtful words and symbols. As The Oregonian's Jerry Ulmer reported recently, Oregon high schools -- from Amity to Warrenton -continue to cling to the past, despite the urgings of an Oregon Department of Education advisory committee six years ago to move forward. The committee called for mascot names to be abolished by September 2009 and images to be removed from schools by September 2011 -- deadlines that the schools have blown right by. Since mere recommendations have not sufficed, the next logical step could be some kind of mandate. If that is necessary, then so be it. The state Board of Education will be discussing this March 8 and March 9. And the board needs to find a way to impress on Oregon schools that these changes are not voluntary. They need to happen. True, some situations may call for exceptional treatment. At Roseburg High School, for instance, the
Page38
Page39