LAS-StatProb-Q4-Week4 (2)
LAS-StatProb-Q4-Week4 (2)
Department of Education
REGION IV-A CALABARZON
TANZA NATIONAL TRADE SCHOOL
In general, if the absolute value of the computed value is greater than the absolute value of the
critical value, we reject the null hypothesis and support the alternative hypothesis. But if the absolute
value of the computed value is less than the absolute value of the critical value, we do not reject or we
fail to reject the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis is not supported.
In a right-tailed test, if the computed value is greater than the critical value, we reject the
null hypothesis and support the alternative hypothesis. But if the computed value is less than the
critical value, we do not reject or we fail to reject the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis
is not supported.
In a left-tailed test, if the computed value is less than the critical value, we reject the null
hypothesis and support the alternative hypothesis. But if the computed value is greater than the
critical value, we do not reject or we fail to reject the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis
is not supported.
Rejecting the null hypothesis doesn’t mean that it is incorrect, or the alternative hypothesis is
correct. The collected data suggest a sufficient evidence to disprove the null hypothesis, hence we reject
it.
Similarly, a failure to reject the null hypothesis does not mean that it is true -only that the test did
not prove it to be false. There is an insufficient evidence to disprove the null hypothesis; hence we do not
reject it.
H a : μ>70 σ =8
n = 100
Solution: It is a one-tailed test, since it does
mention about the direction of the distribution
(the alternative hypothesis uses the symbol >).
Since σ is known and n ≥ 30, we will use z-test.
The level of significance is 0.05. From Table 1, the z-critical value is 1.645. Thus, we have:
Decision: The computed z-value is 1.875 which is greater than the critical value of 1.645.
Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and support the alternative hypothesis.
Decision: The computed t-value is greater than the t-critical value at α =0.01 (i. e.
−1.736>−2.718. Since we have a left-tailed test, our conclusion is that we fail to reject the null
hypothesis.
Example 3: The government claims that P10,000 is the monthly expenses of a Filipino family with four
members. A sample of 26 families has mean monthly
expenses of P10,900 and a standard deviation of
P1,250. Is there enough evidence to reject the
government’s claim at α = 2.5%?
It is a two-tailed test, since it does not mention about the direction of the distribution. Since σ is unknown
and n < 30, we will use t-test. The degree of freedom (df = n - 1) is 25 and α =2.5 % . Therefore, the t-
critical value from Table 2 is 2.485. Thus, we have:
Decision:
The absolute value of the computed t-value is greater than the absolute of the critical t-value
at α =0.025 (i.e. |3.671|> |2.485| ). Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis.
From the t-value table at 0.05 level of significance, the critical value is _______________.
Direction: Using the steps in testing hypothesis, answer the following problems. Write your complete
solutions on a separate sheet of paper.
1. Mapalad Integrated High School determined students’ Body Mass Index (BMI) at the opening of
classes. It has been recorded that the average height of female students is 154.2 centimeters with a
standard deviation of 9 centimeters. A researcher conducted her own study and she randomly selected
40 female students. In her study, she got an average of 156.7 centimeters. Is there a reason to believe
the claims of the school? Use 5% level of significance in testing the hypothesis.
2. The manager of a certain TV station claimed that the average rating of people watching their
noontime teleserye in Manila is 62.5. A researcher randomly selected 25 people and asked them their
favorite noontime teleserye. He computed the mean and obtained 67.8 with standard deviation of 15.9.
Is there a reason to believe that the manager is correct? Use 0.01 as the level of significance.
3. According to the report of National Economic Development Authority (NEDA) last year, a Filipino
household spends an average of ₱333 a day. You took a random sample of 20 households and
determined the amount of their allotted budget each day revealing a mean of ₱420 and standard
deviation of ₱120. Using 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that the average amount spent
per day by a Filipino household has increased? Assume normality over the population.
Reflection:
Direction: In your notebook, write your personal insights about the lesson using the prompts below.
I understand that
___________________________________________________________________________________________.
I realize that
_______________________________________________________________________________________________.
I need to learn more about
___________________________________________________________________________________.
Practice personal hygiene protocols at all times.