Chapter

4
Design of Pressure Pipes
The design methods for buried pressure pipe installations are somewhat similar to the design methods for gravity pipe installations which were discussed in Chap. 3. There are two major differences: 1. Design for internal pressure must be included. 2. Pressure pipes are normally buried with less soil cover so the soil loads are usually less. Included in this chapter are specific design techniques for various pressure piping products. Methods for determining internal loads, external loads, and combined loads are given along with design bases. Pipe Wall Stresses and Strains The stresses and resulting strains arise from various loadings. For buried pipes under pressure, these loadings are usually placed in two broad categories: internal pressure and external loads. The internal pressure is made up of the hydrostatic pressure and the surge pressure. The external loads are usually considered to be those caused by external soil pressure and/or surface (live) loads. Loads due to differential settlement, longitudinal bending, and shear loadings are also considered to be external loadings. Temperature-induced stresses may be considered to be caused by either internal or external effects.
Hydrostatic pressure

Lams solution for stresses in a thick-walled circular cylinder is well known. For a circular cylinder loaded with internal pressure only, those stresses are as follows:
183

Copyright 2008, 2001, 1990 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Click here for terms of use.

184

Chapter Four

Tangential stress:

Pia2 (b2/r2 1) b2 a2 Pa2 (b2/r2 1) i b2 a2

Radial stress: where Pi a b r

internal pressure inside radius outside radius radius to point in question

The maximum stress is the tangential stress (Fig. 4.1). Thus,

, and it occurs at r

( t)

Pia2 (b2/a2 1) b2 a2 Pi (b2 a2) b2 a2 a a) t, Dt (4.1a) (4.1)

or

max

For cylinders (pipe) where a b and b b2 a2 (b a) (b

Pi b st a sr Pi Pi +

a2 b2

b2 a2

Pi

2b 2 b2 a2

smax = (st )r = a

Figure 4.1 Thick-walled cylinder with internal pressure.

Design of Pressure Pipes

185

where D

average diameter (b b2 a2 a) 2 D2

b D2

a and t b2 a2 2 r2

thickness 2ab D2 D2 2

a. Also, (4.1b)

2ab D2

Thus Eq. (4.1) can be rewritten using Eqs. (4.1a) and (4.1b) as follows:
max

P (D2/2) i Dt

PD i 2t

(4.2)

Equation (4.2) is recognized as the equation for stress in a thinwalled cylinder (Fig. 4.2). This equation is sometimes called the Barlow formula, but is just a reduction from Lams solution. This equation is the form most often recognized for calculating stresses due to internal pressure Pi. If the outside diameter Do is the reference dimension, Eq. (4.2) can be put into another form by introducing D Do t That is, the average diameter is equal to the outside diameter minus thickness. Equation (4.2) becomes
max

P (Do i 2t

t)

(4.3)

Pi

PiD D

smax

PiD 2t

PiD

PiD

Figure 4.2 Free-body diagram of half section of pipe with

internal pressure.

186

Chapter Four

Certain plastic pipe specifications refer to a dimension ratio (DR) or a standard dimension ratio (SDR), where DR Do t or SDR Do t

Both DR and SDR are defined the same. However, SDR often refers to a preferred series of numbers that represents Do/t for standard products. By introducing Do/t = SDR into Eq. (4.3), it can be rewritten as follows:
max

Pi (SDR 2

1)

(4.4)

The above equation may be expressed as 2

Pi

SDR

(4.5)

Equation (4.5) is often referred to as the ISO (International Standards Organization) equation for stress due to internal pressure. However, this basic equation has been known to engineers for more than a century and was originally given by Lam in Leons sur la theorie de lelasticit, Paris 1852. Obviously, ISO is a relative newcomer and should not be given credit for Lams work. To calculate these tangential stresses in the pipe wall produced by internal pressure, either Eq. (4.2) or Eq. (4.4) are often suggested by the manufacturer or by national standards. All forms are derived from Lams solution and will produce comparable results.
Surge pressure

Pressure surges are often divided into two categories: transient surges and cyclic surges. Cyclic surging is a regularly occurring pressure fluctuation produced by action of such equipment as reciprocating pumps, undamped pressure control valves or interacting pressure regulating valves, oscillating demand, or other cyclic effects. Cyclic surges may cause fatigue damage and should be designed out of the system. Transient surges are just thattransient in nature, occuring over a relatively short time and between one steady state and another. A transition surge may occur, and the system then returns to the same steady state as before the surge. Transient surges are usually not cyclic in nature although they may be repetitive. A transient surge is often referred to as water hammer. Any action in a piping system that results in a change in velocity of the water in the system is a potential cause of a water hammer surge.

Design of Pressure Pipes

187

A partial listing of some typical causes of water hammer is given below. 1. Changes in valve settings (accidental or planned) 2. Starting or stopping of pumps 3. Unstable pump or turbine characteristics The magnitude of water hammer pressures generated by a given change in velocity depends on (1) the geometry of the system, (2) the magnitude of the change in velocity, and (3) the speed of the waterhammer wave for the particular system. These variables are expressed quantitatively as H where H a g V a g V (4.6)

surge pressure, feet of water velocity of the pressure wave, ft/s acceleration due to gravity (32.17 ft/s2) change in velocity of fluid, ft/s

The pressure rise, in pounds per square inch, may be determined by multiplying Eq. (4.6) by 0.43 lb/in2 per feet of water as follows: P a g V (0.43) (4.7)

The wave speed is dependent upon 1. Pipe properties a. Modulus of elasticity b. Diameter c. Thickness 2. Fluid properties a. Modulus of elasticity b. Density c. Amount of air, and so forth These quantities may be expressed as a 1 where a K 12 K/ (K/E) (D/t) C1 (4.8)

pressure wave velocity, ft/s bulk modulus of water, lb/in2 density of water, slug/ft3

188

Chapter Four

D t E C1

internal diameter of pipe, in wall thickness of pipe, in modulus of elasticity of pipe material, lb/in2 constant dependent upon pipe constraints (C1 with expansion joints along its length)

1.0 for pipe 1.938

For water at 60 F, Eq. (4.8) may be rewritten by substituting slug/ft3 and K 313,000 lb/in2. a 1 4822 (K/E)(D/t)C1

(4.9)

Equations (4.6), (4.7), and (4.8) can be used to determine the magnitude of surge pressure that may be generated in any pipeline. The validity of the equations has been shown through numerous experiments. Figure 4.3 is a plot of the pressure rise in pounds per square inch as a function of velocity change for various values of wave speed. Tables 4.l and 4.2 give the calculated wave speed according to Eq. (4.8) for ductile iron and PVC pipe, respectively. In general, wave speeds vary from 3000 to 5000 ft/s for ductile iron and from 1200 to 1500 for PVC pipes. Determine the magnitude of a water hammer pressure wave induced in a 12-in class 52 ductile iron pipe and in a class 235 DR 18 PVC pipe if the change in velocity is 2 ft/s.
Example Problem 4.1
solution

From Tables 4.1 and 4.2 and Fig. 4.3:

Pipe Class 52 DI Class 235 PVC

The resulting pressure surges are

Some appropriate rules of thumb for determining maximum pressure surges are listed below in pounds per square inch of surge per 1 ft/s change in velocity.
Pipe Steel pipe DI (AWWA C150) PVC (AWWA C900) PVC (pressure-rated) Surge pressure rise, lb/in2, per 1 ft/s velocity change 45 50 20 16

Design of Pressure Pipes

189

700 Velocity of Pressure Wave

1600

600
50

1400

00

1200 Pressure Rise P (lb/in2)

00

40 00

500

400

35

00

45

1000

00 00 30 25
300
20 00

800

600
0

200
13 40

155

400

100
1470

1200

1000

200

4 6 8 Fluid Velocity Change V (ft/s)

10

Figure 4.3 Water hammer surge calculation.

TABLE 4.1

Water Hammer Wave Speed for Ductile Iron Pipe, ft/s Class

Size 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 30 36 42 48 54

50 4206 4085 3996 3919 3859 3783 3716 3655 3550 3387 3311 3255 3207 3201

51 4409 4265 4148 4059 3982 3921 3846 3779 3718 3614 3472 3409 3362 3323 3320

52 4452 5315 4202 4114 4038 3976 3902 3853 3776 3671 3547 3495 3456 3424 3423

53 4488 4358 4248 4162 4087 4024 3952 3887 3827 3723 3615 3571 3539 3512 3512

54 4518 4394 4289 4205 4130 4069 3998 3933 3874 3771 3676 3638 3612 3590 3591

55 4544 4426 4324 4242 4169 4108 4039 4038 3917 3815 3731 3700 3678 3659 3599

Rise in Head H (ft of water)

56 4567 4454 4356 4276 4205 4144 4076 4014 3957 3855 3782 3755 3737 3721 3724

190

Chapter Four

TABLE 4.2

Water Hammer Wave Speed for PVC Pipe, ft/s (AWWA C900) DR Pressure-rated PVC SDR 14 1496 1496 1496 1496 1496 21 1210 1210 1210 1210 1210 26 1084 1084 1084 1084 1084 32.5 967 967 967 967 967 41 859 859 859 859 859 25 1106 1106 1106 1106 1106 18 1311 1311 1311 1311 1311

Size 4 6 8 10 12

Since velocity changes are the cause of water hammer surge, proper control of valving may eliminate or minimize water hammer. If fluid approaching a closing valve is able to sense the valve closing and adjust its flow path accordingly, then the maximum surge pressure as calculated from Eq. (4.6) may be avoided. To accomplish this, the flow must not be shut off any faster than it would take a pressure wave to be initiated at the beginning of valve closing and returning again to the valve. This is called the critical time and is defined as the longest elapsed time before final flow stoppage that will still permit this maximum pressure to occur. This is expressed mathematically as Tcr where Tcr L a 2L a

critical time distance within the pipeline that the pressure wave moves before it is reflected back by a boundary condition, ft velocity of pressure wave for the particular pipeline, ft/s

Thus, the critical time for a line leading from a reservoir to a valve 3000 ft away for which the wave velocity is 1500 ft/s is Tcr 2 (3000) ft 1500 ft/s 4s

Unfortunately, most valve designs (including gate, cone, globe, and butterfly valves) do not cut off flow proportionate to the valve-stem travel (see Fig. 4.4).This figure illustrates how the valve stem, in turning the last portion of its travel, cuts off the majority of the flow. It is extremely important, therefore, to base timing of valve closing on the effective closing time of the particular valve in question. This effective time may be taken as about one-half of the actual valve closing time.