Pistachio Nut Consumption and Serum Lipid Levels: Original Research
Pistachio Nut Consumption and Serum Lipid Levels: Original Research
Pistachio Nut Consumption and Serum Lipid Levels: Original Research
INTRODUCTION
Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of death accounting for 29.5% of all deaths in the United States and hypercholesterolemia, which affects nearly 100 million adults, is a significant risk factor. Early population studies strongly suggested a relationship between total and saturated fat intake and CHD [1,2] and for many years reduction in total fat intake, saturated fat and cholesterol was the primary dietary recommendation to lower serum cholesterol. However, recently revised national dietary recommendations for major health organizations have de-emphasized the role of lowering total fat in
the prevention of coronary heart disease [3 6]. Mounting evidence from metabolic [710], observational [1113] and epidemiological studies [14 25] has shown that diets high in unsaturated fats can reduce cholesterol levels and suggest that lowering saturated fat and replacing carbohydrates with unsaturated fats is more effective in preventing CHD than reducing overall fat intake. The American Heart Association recommends that up to 20% of calories come from monounsaturated fat [3]. Dietary approaches focusing exclusively on the reduction of saturated fat and cholesterol may also reduce HDL-C levels, adversely affecting TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C ratios [26,27].
Address reprint requests to: Michael J. Sheridan, Sc.D., Director, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, 3300 Gallows Road, Falls Church, VA 22042-3300. E-mail: michael.sheridan@inova.com
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 26, No. 2, 141148 (2007) Published by the American College of Nutrition 141
Experimental Design
A prospective, randomized, crossover design was utilized, with subjects serving as their own controls. All subjects consumed their normal diets during a five-day baseline period. Subsequently, seven subjects were randomized to the pistachio diet for four weeks followed by four weeks on the regular diet, while eight subjects followed these diets in the reverse order. All subjects had their lipid profiles measured during the second and fourth weeks of each 4-week dietary period. Study personnel performing the statistical analyses were blinded to the dietary sequence of the subject. The study was not designed to examine any carry-over effects from the pistachio diet to the regular diet. The protocol was approved by the Inova Institutional Review Board at the Inova Fairfax Hospital and all subjects gave informed consent. Subjects were offered an honorarium of $300 for their participation, with payments of $25 for each of the first five visits and the remaining $175 paid at the conclusion of the study.
Dietary Intervention
Each subject was required to submit a consecutive three-day food diary before entering the baseline period and before any scheduled meetings with the dietitian. Food diaries were analyzed for total energy (kcal) and percent of macronutrient content (protein, carbohydrate, saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, and dietary fiber). Seven patients were then randomized to a pistachio diet. The intervention diet involved consuming pistachio nuts for 15% of their daily caloric intake, about 2 to 3 ounces per day. Pistachios were given out in pre-measured storage bags, whose kcal/day content was calculated for each individual subject. Subjects were instructed to substitute the pistachio nuts for normally consumed high fat snacks. Subjects who did not normally consume highfat snacks were asked to substitute pistachio nuts as fat calories. Otherwise, the subjects consumed their normal, regular diets. For each week of the pistachio diet, subjects kept one-day food records that were analyzed to ensure that the subjects were consuming the assigned quantity of pistachio nuts. There was no definitive compliance measure of pistachio consumption. Subjects were asked to return their pistachio storage bags at each visit. All eleven of the male subjects and two of the four female subjects were accompanied by a spouse or family member, who was queried about pistachio consumption at each of the study visits. The dietitian met weekly with each subject to discuss any issues regarding pistachio consumption. After four weeks the subjects switched diets, with those on the pistachio diet crossing over to their regular diet, and vice versa. There was no lag time between diets.
Measurements
Body weight, height, and blood pressure for each subject were measured during the baseline period and during weeks 2
142
RESULTS
Blood Pressure and Body Mass Index
There were no statistically significant changes in blood pressure or body mass index (BMI) during the study (Table 1).
Dietary Intake
No differences were seen for total energy or percent of total energy from protein, carbohydrate, total fat or monounsaturated fat intake (Table 2). On the pistachio diet, a statistically significant decrease was seen for saturated fat intake (mean difference, 2.7%; 95% CI, 5.4% to 0.10%; p 0.04). Statistically significant increases favoring the pistachio diet also were observed for polyunsaturated fat intake (mean difference, 6.5%; 95% CI, 4.2% to 8.9%; p .0001) and for dietary fiber (mean difference, 15g; 95% CI, 8.4g to 22g; p 0.0003). Percent change on the pistachio diet for saturated fat intake, polyunsaturated fat intake and dietary fiber were 37%, 103% and 83%, respectively.
Statistical Analysis
The sample size estimate was based on a difference in LDL-C of 15mg/dL between the pistachio and regular diets and a standard deviation of 20mg/dL for the distribution about both means for a power of 0.80 and a type 1 error of 0.05. The required number of subjects to detect this difference was 15. As no differences in outcome trends were seen based on the sequence of the diets, outcome data were aligned and are Table 1. Subject Values
Mean (SEM) Variables Baseline Age (years) Gender (% Male) Weight (lbs.) Height (in.) BMI (kg/m2) Blood Pressure (mm Hg) Systolic Diastolic Pulse 60 (2.9) 73% 175 (6.7) 67 (1.1) 27.7 (0.90) 129 (3.7) 84 (2.7) 78 (2.2) Pistachio . . 176 (6.2) 67 (1.0) 27.8 (0.81) 128 (3.4) 84 (2.2) 76 (2.0) Regular . . 176 (6.3) 67 (1.0) 27.7 (0.82) 125 (3.9) 81 (2.4) 75 (2.4)
Lipid Values
Statistically significant differences favoring the pistachio diet were observed for HDL-C, TC/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, and B-100/A-1 (Table 3). HDL-C on the pistachio diet was 57 3.5 mg/dL versus 54 3.4 mg/dL on the regular diet (mean difference, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.48 to 4.0; p 0.02). TC/
Difference 95% CI Pistachio vs. Regular . . . . 0.14 { 0.17, 0.45} 2.7 { 5.4, 11} 2.4 { 3.2, 8.0} 1.5 { 5.7, 8.6}
p-value
Difference 95% CI Pistachio vs. Baseline . . . . 0.18 { 0.26, 0.62} 1.3 { 8.8, 6.2} 0 { 6.5, 6.5} 2.0 { 8.2, 4.2}
p-value
143
2120 (153) 2213 (159) 16 (0.69) 17 (1.2) 51 (1.40) 51 (1.8) 31 (1.2) 31 (1.1) 10 (0.87) 7.3 (0.68) 11 (1.1) 11 (1.2) 6.5 (0.52) 12 (1.1) 21 (2.9) 33 (4.0)
84 { 130, 299} 1.1 { 1.1, 3.3} 0.95 { 4.9, 3.0} 0.73 { 2.0, 3.5} 2.7 { 5.4, 0.08} 0.20 { 1.3, 1.7} 6.5 {4.2, 8.9} 15 {8.4, 22}
93 { 181, 368} 1.3 { 0.52, 3.2} 0.18 { 3.1, 3.5} 0.80 { 2.3, 3.9} 3.0 { 4.3, 1.7} 0.60 { 1.2, 2.4} 5.9 {4.0, 7.7} 12 {3.0, 21}
9.2 { 21, 2.4} 0.67 { 25, 26} 2.3 {0.48, 4.0} 0.38 { 0.57, 0.19} 15 { 31, 0.94} 0.40 { 0.66, 0.15} 2.7 { 7.1, 1.7}
19, 1.5} 23, 2.8} 0.22, 3.3} 0.55, 0.08} 31, 0.99} 0.66, 0.11} 4.8, 0.71}
135 (6.0) 146 (4.9) 138 (6.1) 132 (5.3) 119 (5.5) 124 (6.0) 1.0 {0.07} 0.83 {0.05} 0.94 {0.07}
HDL-C was 4.4 0.26 mg/dL on the pistachio diet versus 4.8 0.31 mg/dL on the regular diet (mean difference, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.19; p 0.001). LDL-C/HDL-C was 2.8 0.25 mg/dL on the pistachio diet versus 3.2 0.26 mg/ dL on the regular diet (mean difference, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.15; p 0.004). B-100/A-1 was 0.83 0.05 mg/dL on the pistachio diet versus 0.94 0.07 on the regular diet (mean difference, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.03, p 0.009). Percent changes on the pistachio diet for HDL-C, TC/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, and B-100/A-1 were 6%, 9%, 14%, and 13%, respectively. No statistically significant differences between the pistachio and regular diets were seen for TC, triglycerides, LDL-C, VLDL-C, or apolipoproteins A-1 and B-100. Percent changes on the pistachio diet for TC, LDL-C, VLDL-C and apolipoproteins A-1 and B-100 were 4%, 10%, 12%, 6% and 13%, respectively. However, when pistachio diet values were compared to baseline diet values, statistically significant improvements on the pistachio diet were seen for TC/HDL-C (p 0.01), LDL-C (p 0.04), LDL-C/HDL-C (p 0.009), apolipoprotein A-1 (p 0.004), apolipoprotein B-100 (p 0.005), and B-100/A-1 (p 0.0003). Percent changes on the pistachio diet for TC/HDL-C, LDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C,
apolipoproteins A-1 and B-100, and B-100/A-1 were 11%, 11%, 8%, 11%, and 20% respectively.
7%,
DISCUSSION
The results of this study, a randomized crossover trial conducted in fifteen free-living subjects with moderate hypercholesterolemia, add to the growing body of evidence that the consumption of a daily dose of nuts in the diet can modify serum lipids beneficially. The dietary intervention consisted of the addition of pistachios, at approximately 15% of total daily calories (about 23 ounces per day), which brought polyunsaturated fat intake to about 12% of total calories. Statistically significant increases were seen in HDL-C (6%, p 0.02), and decreases in TC/HDL-C ( 9%, p 0.001), in LDL-C/HDL-C ( 14%, p 0.004), and in B-100/A-1 ( 13%, p 0.009). Decreases also were seen in LDL-C ( 9%, p 0.06). No changes in body mass index or blood pressure were observed. While measurement of serum lipids is a recommended part of cardiovascular risk detection, the predictive value of specific lipid measures remains controversial. Kinosian et al. [57,58] and Natarajan et al. [59] have reported that changes in ratios of
144
145
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Supported by an unrestricted small grant from the California Pistachio Commission. We are indebted to our subjects for their dedicated participation in the study, to Kathy Bough, RD and Eileen Brown, RN for their assistance in carrying out the study, and to Kathleen McMahon, PhD, RD for technical review of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. Keys A: Seven Countries: A Multivariate Analysis of Death and Coronary Heart Disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980. 2. Kromhout D, Menotti A, Bloemberg B, Aravanis C, Blackburn H, Buzina R, Donatas AS, Fidanza F, Giampaoli S, Jansen A: Dietary saturated fat and trans fatty acids and cholesterol and 25-year mortality from coronary heart disease: the Seven Countries Study. Prev Med 24:308315, 1995. 3. Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, Appel LJ, Daniels SR, Deckelbaum RJ, Erdman Jr JW, Kris-Etherton P, Goldberg IJ, Kotchen TA, Lichtenstein, AH, Mitch WE, Mullis R, Robinson K, WylieRosett J, St Jeor S, Suttie J, Tribble DL, Bazzarre TL: AHA Dietary Guidelines Revision 2000: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation 102:22842299, 2000. 4. US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services: Nutrition and your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Homes and Gardens Bulletin No. 232. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000. 5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health, 2nd ed. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000. 6. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III): final report. Circulation 106:31433421, 2002.
146
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
147
148