ASP.

NET Core Fundamentals

1. Explain the Request Pipeline in ASP.NET Core

The request pipeline in ASP.NET Core is a sequence of middleware

components that process an HTTP request and generate a response. ASP.NET
Core uses a modular pipeline that is defined in the Startup.cs or
Program.cs file, allowing developers to add or customize middleware
components.

 Pipeline Flow:

o An HTTP request enters the pipeline.

o Middleware components process the request sequentially.

o Middleware can either:

 Pass the request to the next component using await next().

 Short-circuit the pipeline and return a response.

 Key Components:

o Routing Middleware: Matches the incoming request to a route.

o Authentication/Authorization Middleware: Validates and

authorizes user requests.

o Exception Handling Middleware: Catches unhandled

exceptions and formats responses.

o Custom Middleware: Allows developers to inject custom logic.

 Code Example:

csharp

CopyEdit

public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)

app.UseRouting();

app.UseAuthentication();

app.UseAuthorization();

app.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 {

endpoints.MapControllers();

});

2. How Does Middleware Work in ASP.NET Core? Can You

Demonstrate Creating Custom Middleware?

Middleware in ASP.NET Core operates as building blocks in the request

pipeline. Each middleware component can:

1. Perform operations before and/or after invoking the next middleware.

2. Handle or modify requests and responses.

 How Middleware Works:

o Middleware is registered using IApplicationBuilder methods (Use,

Run, or Map).

o Middleware components follow a chain of responsibility

pattern.

 Custom Middleware Example:

csharp

CopyEdit

public class CustomMiddleware

private readonly RequestDelegate _next;

public CustomMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)

_next = next;

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)

// Pre-processing logic

Console.WriteLine($"Request URL: {context.Request.Path}");

await _next(context); // Call the next middleware

// Post-processing logic

Console.WriteLine($"Response Status Code:

{context.Response.StatusCode}");

public static class CustomMiddlewareExtensions

public static IApplicationBuilder UseCustomMiddleware(this

IApplicationBuilder builder)

return builder.UseMiddleware<CustomMiddleware>();

o Usage:

csharp

CopyEdit

public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)

app.UseCustomMiddleware();

This information/document has been classified: Personal

}

3. What Is the Difference Between IApplicationBuilder and

IServiceCollection?

 IApplicationBuilder:

o Used to configure the HTTP request pipeline.

o Focused on adding middleware components.

o Example: app.UseRouting(), app.UseEndpoints().

 IServiceCollection:

o Used to configure dependency injection services.

o Registers application services, options, and configurations.

o Example: services.AddDbContext(), services.AddControllers().

 Key Differences:

o IApplicationBuilder deals with the request flow; IServiceCollection

deals with service configuration.

o Middleware (IApplicationBuilder) consumes services

(IServiceCollection) injected via DI.

4. How Does Dependency Injection Work in ASP.NET Core, and How

Is It Different from Other Frameworks?

 Dependency Injection (DI):

ASP.NET Core has a built-in DI container, which is lightweight,
extensible, and tightly integrated into the framework.

 How It Works:

o Services are registered in IServiceCollection.

o Services are resolved and injected via constructors or method

parameters.

 Example:

csharp

This information/document has been classified: Personal

CopyEdit

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)

services.AddSingleton<IMyService, MyService>();

services.AddScoped<DbContext>();

public class MyController : ControllerBase

private readonly IMyService _myService;

public MyController(IMyService myService)

_myService = myService;

 Difference from Other Frameworks:

o Java Spring: Uses annotations like @Inject and external

configuration files.

o .NET Framework: Relied on third-party DI containers (e.g.,

Autofac, Ninject).

o ASP.NET Core simplifies DI by integrating it natively into the

framework.

5. What Are IHostedService and BackgroundService? When Would

You Use Them?

 IHostedService:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o A basic interface for implementing long-running background
tasks.

o Has two methods: StartAsync and StopAsync.

 BackgroundService:

o A base class derived from IHostedService that simplifies

background task implementation using ExecuteAsync.

 When to Use:

o IHostedService: For lightweight or straightforward tasks where

more control is needed.

o BackgroundService: For tasks requiring a long-running,

asynchronous operation.

 Example of BackgroundService:

csharp

CopyEdit

public class MyBackgroundService : BackgroundService

protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken

stoppingToken)

while (!stoppingToken.IsCancellationRequested)

Console.WriteLine("Background task running...");

await Task.Delay(1000, stoppingToken);

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)

This information/document has been classified: Personal

{

services.AddHostedService<MyBackgroundService>();

Advanced Topics

6. How Would You Implement Caching in ASP.NET Core (In-Memory,

Distributed, and Response Caching)?

Caching is a critical aspect of optimizing performance in ASP.NET Core

applications by reducing redundant processing and database calls. ASP.NET
Core supports various caching strategies:

In-Memory Caching

 Description: Stores data in the memory of the web server.

 Usage: Suitable for single-server deployments.

 Implementation:

csharp

CopyEdit

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)

services.AddMemoryCache();

public class CacheExampleController : ControllerBase

private readonly IMemoryCache _cache;

public CacheExampleController(IMemoryCache cache)

_cache = cache;

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 }

[HttpGet]

public IActionResult GetCachedData()

string cacheKey = "TimeStamp";

if (!_cache.TryGetValue(cacheKey, out string cachedValue))

cachedValue = DateTime.Now.ToString();

_cache.Set(cacheKey, cachedValue, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5));

return Ok(cachedValue);

Distributed Caching

 Description: Stores cache data in a distributed storage (e.g., Redis,

SQL Server).

 Usage: Suitable for multi-server environments.

 Implementation:

csharp

CopyEdit

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)

services.AddStackExchangeRedisCache(options =>

options.Configuration = "localhost:6379";

});

This information/document has been classified: Personal

}

public class DistributedCacheExampleController : ControllerBase

private readonly IDistributedCache _cache;

public DistributedCacheExampleController(IDistributedCache cache)

_cache = cache;

[HttpGet]

public async Task<IActionResult> GetCachedData()

string cacheKey = "TimeStamp";

string cachedValue = await _cache.GetStringAsync(cacheKey);

if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(cachedValue))

cachedValue = DateTime.Now.ToString();

await _cache.SetStringAsync(cacheKey, cachedValue, new

DistributedCacheEntryOptions

AbsoluteExpirationRelativeToNow = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5)

});

return Ok(cachedValue);

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 }

Response Caching

 Description: Caches entire HTTP responses.

 Usage: Reduces load for frequently accessed resources.

 Implementation:

csharp

CopyEdit

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)

services.AddResponseCaching();

public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)

app.UseResponseCaching();

[HttpGet]

[ResponseCache(Duration = 60)]

public IActionResult GetResponse()

return Ok("This response is cached for 60 seconds.");

7. What Are the Advantages of Using Kestrel as a Web Server in

ASP.NET Core?

This information/document has been classified: Personal

Kestrel is the default web server for ASP.NET Core and offers several
advantages:

 High Performance: Built on libuv/IOCP, optimized for asynchronous

I/O operations.

 Cross-Platform: Runs on Windows, Linux, and macOS.

 Lightweight: Minimal overhead, designed for efficiency.

 Integrated with ASP.NET Core: Works seamlessly with middleware,

routing, and other framework components.

 Flexibility: Can run as a standalone web server or behind a reverse

proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache).

 Security Features: Includes HTTPS support, connection limits, and

request body size limits.

8. Explain the Difference Between Model Binding and Model

Validation. How Do You Customize Them?

Model Binding:

 Purpose: Maps incoming request data (e.g., query strings, form data,
route data) to controller action parameters or model properties.

 Customization:

o Use [FromQuery], [FromBody], [FromRoute], etc., to specify

binding sources.

o Implement custom model binders:

csharp

CopyEdit

public class CustomModelBinder : IModelBinder

public Task BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)

var value =
bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue("customKey").FirstValue;

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 bindingContext.Result = ModelBindingResult.Success(value);

return Task.CompletedTask;

Model Validation:

 Purpose: Ensures data integrity by validating model properties against

attributes (e.g., [Required], [Range]).

 Customization:

o Create custom validation attributes:

csharp

CopyEdit

public class CustomValidationAttribute : ValidationAttribute

protected override ValidationResult IsValid(object value, ValidationContext

validationContext)

if (value.ToString() == "Invalid")

return new ValidationResult("Value is invalid.");

return ValidationResult.Success;

9. How Do You Handle Concurrency in ASP.NET Core When Multiple

Users Access Shared Resources?

Concurrency handling is essential for ensuring data consistency in multi-user

environments. Common strategies include:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

1. Optimistic Concurrency:

 Description: Assumes conflicts are rare. Uses a concurrency token

(e.g., timestamp or version number) to detect conflicts.

 Implementation:

csharp

CopyEdit

public class MyEntity

public int Id { get; set; }

[Timestamp]

public byte[] RowVersion { get; set; }

2. Pessimistic Concurrency:

 Description: Locks the resource during access to prevent conflicts.

 Implementation: Use database locking mechanisms (e.g., SELECT ...

FOR UPDATE).

3. Critical Section:

 Description: Use synchronization primitives (e.g., lock in C#) for in-

memory operations.

 Implementation:

csharp

CopyEdit

private static readonly object _lock = new object();

public void UpdateResource()

lock (_lock)

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 // Critical section

4. Distributed Locking:

 Use Redis or similar tools to handle distributed locks for multi-server

setups.

10. Discuss the Role and Configuration of WebHostBuilder vs.

GenericHostBuilder

WebHostBuilder:

 Used in ASP.NET Core 2.x and earlier for hosting web applications.

 Primarily for configuring an HTTP server (Kestrel, IIS).

 Example:

csharp

CopyEdit

var host = new WebHostBuilder()

.UseKestrel()

.UseStartup<Startup>()

.Build();

host.Run();

GenericHostBuilder:

 Introduced in ASP.NET Core 3.x for generic hosting.

 Supports web and non-web workloads.

 Provides a unified hosting model.

 Example:

csharp

CopyEdit

This information/document has been classified: Personal

var host = Host.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)

.ConfigureWebHostDefaults(webBuilder =>

webBuilder.UseStartup<Startup>();

})

.Build();

host.Run();

Key Differences:

Aspect WebHostBuilder GenericHostBuilder

Web applications Web and non-web

Use Case
only workloads

Unified for broader

Flexibility Limited
scenarios

Lifecycle Advanced (e.g.,

Basic
Management IHostedService)

Key Takeaway

Provide practical implementations and highlight how these techniques and

configurations align with your extensive experience in designing robust,
high-performance systems at scale.

Performance Optimization

11. How Do You Diagnose and Optimize Performance in an ASP.NET

Core Application?

Diagnosing and optimizing performance involves identifying bottlenecks,

analyzing resource usage, and applying targeted improvements.

Steps to Diagnose Performance Issues:

1. Use Logging and Monitoring:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o Leverage Application Insights, ELK stack, or Prometheus for
performance monitoring.

o Add structured logging with Serilog or NLog.

2. Profiling Tools:

o Use dotnet-trace, dotnet-counters, or Visual Studio Profiler

to analyze CPU and memory usage.

o Analyze runtime performance with PerfView or JetBrains

dotTrace.

3. Analyze HTTP Traffic:

o Use Fiddler or Postman to inspect requests and responses.

o Monitor latency using Wireshark or Browser Developer Tools.

4. Database Performance:

o Profile database queries using SQL Server Profiler or EF Core

logging.

o Optimize queries by analyzing execution plans.

Optimization Techniques:

1. Caching:

o Use In-Memory Cache, Distributed Cache, or Response

Caching.

o Implement ETag headers for resource versioning.

2. Reduce Payload:

o Use Gzip or Brotli compression.

o Serialize responses with System.Text.Json instead of

Newtonsoft.Json.

3. Asynchronous Programming:

o Use async/await for I/O-bound operations to avoid blocking

threads.

4. Load Balancing:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o Scale horizontally with load balancers like NGINX or Azure Load
Balancer.

12. What Are Some Best Practices for Improving the Performance of
APIs in ASP.NET Core?

1. Optimize API Design:

 Use pagination for large datasets.

 Implement filtering, sorting, and projection to limit returned data.

2. Minimize Overhead:

 Avoid overloading middleware.

 Use lightweight serialization libraries such as System.Text.Json.

3. Leverage Caching:

 Use distributed caching (e.g., Redis) for frequently accessed data.

 Cache static data and query results.

4. Reduce Latency:

 Use HTTP/2 for faster parallel data transfer.

 Enable response compression.

5. Optimize Database Operations:

 Use NoTracking queries in EF Core for read-only operations.

 Avoid N+1 query problems by eager loading related entities.

6. Asynchronous Operations:

 Use Task.Run() sparingly and prefer async/await.

13. How Would You Implement a Rate-Limiting Feature in an

ASP.NET Core Application?

Rate limiting prevents excessive API requests, ensuring fair resource usage
and protecting against abuse.

Using Middleware:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

  Implement custom middleware to track request counts and enforce
limits.

csharp

CopyEdit

public class RateLimitingMiddleware

private readonly RequestDelegate _next;

private static readonly Dictionary<string, int> RequestCounts = new();

private const int Limit = 100; // Example limit

public RateLimitingMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)

_next = next;

public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)

var ipAddress = context.Connection.RemoteIpAddress?.ToString();

if (!RequestCounts.ContainsKey(ipAddress))

RequestCounts[ipAddress] = 0;

if (RequestCounts[ipAddress] >= Limit)

context.Response.StatusCode = 429; // Too Many Requests

await context.Response.WriteAsync("Rate limit exceeded.");

return;

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 RequestCounts[ipAddress]++;

await _next(context);

RequestCounts[ipAddress]--; // Decrease count after response

public static class RateLimitingMiddlewareExtensions

public static IApplicationBuilder UseRateLimiting(this IApplicationBuilder

builder) =>

builder.UseMiddleware<RateLimitingMiddleware>();

Using Libraries:

 Leverage libraries like AspNetCoreRateLimit for advanced rate-

limiting.

 Example:

csharp

CopyEdit

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)

services.AddInMemoryRateLimiting();

services.AddSingleton<IRateLimitConfiguration,
RateLimitConfiguration>();

public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 app.UseIpRateLimiting();

14. What Tools and Methods Do You Use for Profiling an ASP.NET
Core Application?

1. Built-In Tools:

 dotnet-trace: Captures detailed performance traces.

 dotnet-counters: Monitors runtime counters (e.g., GC, CPU, threads).

2. Visual Studio Profiler:

 Use Diagnostics Tools in Visual Studio for live performance

monitoring.

3. Third-Party Tools:

 JetBrains dotTrace: Advanced performance profiling.

 MiniProfiler: Lightweight request profiling.

4. Cloud-Based Monitoring:

 Application Insights (Azure): End-to-end application monitoring.

 New Relic or Datadog for cloud-based performance analytics.

5. Analyzing Logs:

 Use structured logging tools like Serilog to correlate logs and

performance metrics.

15. How Do You Handle Memory Management and Garbage

Collection Issues?

Memory management in ASP.NET Core relies on managed memory and

garbage collection (GC).

Best Practices for Memory Management:

1. Dispose Resources:

o Implement IDisposable for unmanaged resources.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o Use using statements for deterministic disposal.

2. Avoid Large Object Allocations:

o Use Span<T> or ArrayPool<T> to reduce large memory

allocations.

o Cache frequently used large objects.

3. Minimize Boxing/Unboxing:

o Avoid boxing value types by using generic collections (e.g.,

List<T>).

4. Optimize String Usage:

o Use StringBuilder for concatenations.

o Avoid unnecessary string allocations.

Garbage Collection Optimization:

 Use GC.TryStartNoGCRegion() for temporary high-performance

scenarios.

 Tune GC settings in runtimeconfig.json:

json

CopyEdit

"runtimeOptions": {

"configProperties": {

"System.GC.Server": true,

"System.GC.RetainVM": false

Memory Leak Detection:

 Use tools like dotMemory, PerfView, or Visual Studio Diagnostic

Tools to analyze memory usage and detect leaks.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

Key Takeaway

For a senior role, emphasize your ability to identify, analyze, and resolve
performance bottlenecks while following best practices. Showcase your
knowledge of tools, frameworks, and techniques to maintain highly
performant and scalable ASP.NET Core applications.

Security

16. How Does ASP.NET Core Implement Authentication and

Authorization?

ASP.NET Core provides a robust framework for implementing authentication

(identity verification) and authorization (access control).

Authentication:

ASP.NET Core supports multiple authentication schemes:

 Cookie-based Authentication for web apps.

 Bearer Tokens for APIs (e.g., JWT).

 OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect for modern federated

authentication.

 External providers like Google, Facebook, or Microsoft Account.

Implementation involves:

 Configuring authentication services in Startup.cs or Program.cs.

 Using middleware (app.UseAuthentication() and

app.UseAuthorization()).

 Leveraging ASP.NET Core Identity for user management, or custom

authentication handlers.

Authorization:

1. Role-based Authorization:

o Access granted based on user roles.

csharp

CopyEdit

This information/document has been classified: Personal

[Authorize(Roles = "Admin")]

public IActionResult AdminOnly() => View();

2. Policy-based Authorization:

o Define granular policies for access control.

csharp

CopyEdit

services.AddAuthorization(options =>

options.AddPolicy("RequireAdmin", policy =>

policy.RequireRole("Admin"));

});

3. Claims-based Authorization:

o Access control based on user claims.

csharp

CopyEdit

options.AddPolicy("AgePolicy", policy =>

policy.RequireClaim("Age", "18"));

17. What Are the Differences Between Cookie-Based Authentication

and JWT Authentication?

Cookie-Based
Aspect JWT Authentication
Authentication

Preferred for APIs and stateless

Usage Ideal for web applications.
systems.

Auth data stored in a cookie on Token stored in local storage or

Storage
the client. passed in headers.

Relies on server-side session Stateless; does not require server

State
state. storage.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 Cookie-Based
Aspect JWT Authentication
Authentication

Scalabili Limited by session state Highly scalable due to

ty scalability. statelessness.

Vulnerable to CSRF if not Vulnerable to XSS; tokens can be

Security
configured properly. stolen.

Session extended with each Requires refresh tokens for

Renewal
request. renewal.

18. Explain How to Secure an ASP.NET Core API Using OAuth 2.0 and
OpenID Connect

Steps to Secure an API:

1. Add Authentication Services:

o Use the AddAuthentication and AddJwtBearer methods.

csharp

CopyEdit

services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)

.AddJwtBearer(options =>

options.Authority = "https://example.com"; // Authorization server

options.Audience = "api1"; // API resource

});

2. Configure Authorization:

o Protect API endpoints with [Authorize].

csharp

CopyEdit

[Authorize]

[HttpGet("secure-data")]

This information/document has been classified: Personal

public IActionResult GetSecureData() => Ok("Protected data");

3. Use OpenID Connect for Identity:

o Integrate with identity providers like Azure AD, Auth0, or Okta for
authentication and user info.

csharp

CopyEdit

services.AddAuthentication(options =>

options.DefaultScheme =
CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme;

options.DefaultChallengeScheme =
OpenIdConnectDefaults.AuthenticationScheme;

})

.AddOpenIdConnect(options =>

options.Authority = "https://example.com";

options.ClientId = "client-id";

options.ClientSecret = "client-secret";

options.ResponseType = "code";

});

4. Validate Tokens:

o Ensure proper token validation using the JwtBearerOptions.

o Validate claims and roles for API access.

19. What Is CORS, and How Do You Configure It in ASP.NET Core?

CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) allows web applications to

securely access resources from different domains.

Configuring CORS in ASP.NET Core:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 1. Add CORS Services:

o Register CORS policies in Startup.cs or Program.cs.

csharp

CopyEdit

services.AddCors(options =>

options.AddPolicy("AllowSpecificOrigins", builder =>

builder.WithOrigins("https://trusted.com")

.AllowAnyMethod()

.AllowAnyHeader());

});

2. Enable CORS Middleware:

o Apply the policy globally or to specific endpoints.

csharp

CopyEdit

app.UseCors("AllowSpecificOrigins");

3. Per-Controller or Action:

o Apply policies using the [EnableCors] attribute.

csharp

CopyEdit

[EnableCors("AllowSpecificOrigins")]

public IActionResult Get() => Ok("CORS enabled.");

20. How Would You Implement Secure Data Transmission Using

HTTPS and Certificates?

Securing data transmission ensures confidentiality and integrity of

communication.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

Steps to Enable HTTPS:

1. Enforce HTTPS:

o Redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS.

csharp

CopyEdit

app.UseHttpsRedirection();

2. Use Certificates:

o Configure the application to use a trusted SSL certificate.

o For local development:

bash

CopyEdit

dotnet dev-certs https --trust

o For production, use certificates from trusted CAs like Let's

Encrypt.

3. HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security):

o Add HSTS to ensure clients use HTTPS.

csharp

CopyEdit

app.UseHsts();

Mutual Authentication:

 Require client certificates for mutual authentication.

 Configure Kestrel for certificate validation:

csharp

CopyEdit

webBuilder.ConfigureKestrel(options =>

options.ConfigureHttpsDefaults(o =>

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 {

o.ClientCertificateMode = ClientCertificateMode.RequireCertificate;

});

});

Secure Protocols:

 Disable outdated protocols (e.g., TLS 1.0/1.1).

 Enable only secure protocols (e.g., TLS 1.2+).

csharp

CopyEdit

webBuilder.ConfigureKestrel(serverOptions =>

serverOptions.ConfigureHttpsDefaults(httpsOptions =>

httpsOptions.SslProtocols = SslProtocols.Tls12 | SslProtocols.Tls13;

});

});

Key Takeaway

When responding, emphasize your ability to secure applications using

industry-standard protocols, tools, and configurations. Showcase a deep
understanding of modern authentication, authorization, and data security
practices to meet enterprise-level requirements effectively.

Entity Framework Core

21. How Do You Optimize Complex Queries Using EF Core?

Optimizing complex queries is crucial for performance and scalability. Key

techniques include:

1. Use Raw SQL When Needed:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o For highly complex queries, use raw SQL with EF Core’s FromSql
methods:

csharp

CopyEdit

var result = context.Users

.FromSqlRaw("SELECT * FROM Users WHERE IsActive = 1")

.ToList();

2. Leverage LINQ-to-Entities:

o Write efficient LINQ queries that translate directly to SQL:

csharp

CopyEdit

var users = context.Users

.Where(u => u.IsActive && u.LastLogin > DateTime.UtcNow.AddDays(-30))

.Select(u => new { u.Name, u.Email })

.ToList();

3. Include Related Data Only When Necessary:

o Use Include judiciously to load related entities only when

required.

csharp

CopyEdit

var orders = context.Orders

.Include(o => o.Customer)

.Where(o => o.Total > 1000)

.ToList();

4. Pagination:

o Always paginate results for large datasets to avoid excessive

memory usage.

csharp

This information/document has been classified: Personal

CopyEdit

var pagedData = context.Products

.OrderBy(p => p.Name)

.Skip(10)

.Take(10)

.ToList();

5. Database Indexing:

o Ensure proper indexes are applied on frequently queried

columns.

6. Projection:

o Use Select to retrieve only required columns instead of entire

entities.

csharp

CopyEdit

var names = context.Users

.Select(u => u.Name)

.ToList();

22. Explain the Difference Between AsNoTracking and Tracking in EF

Core

Aspect Tracking AsNoTracking

State Tracks changes made to entities No change tracking; suitable

Management for persistence. for read-only data.

Slightly slower due to tracking

Performance Faster for large datasets.
overhead.

Useful for CRUD operations Ideal for querying or

Use Case
where updates are needed. reporting.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

Aspect Tracking AsNoTracking

Change Enables SaveChanges() to No changes are tracked or

Detection persist modifications. saved.

Example:

csharp

CopyEdit

// Tracking

var user = context.Users.FirstOrDefault(u => u.Id == 1);

user.Name = "Updated Name";

context.SaveChanges(); // Changes will be saved

// AsNoTracking

var readOnlyUsers = context.Users.AsNoTracking().ToList();

// Changes to readOnlyUsers are not tracked

23. How Do You Handle Migrations in EF Core for Large-Scale

Applications?

1. Use Separate Migration Projects:

o Isolate migrations in a separate class library for better

organization.

bash

CopyEdit

dotnet ef migrations add InitialMigration --project MigrationsProject

2. Customize the Migration Script:

o Review and edit auto-generated scripts for large-scale changes

to ensure accuracy.

3. Manage Downtime:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o Use transactional migrations and tools like flyway or liquibase
for zero-downtime deployments.

4. Split Large Migrations:

o Break large migrations into smaller, incremental scripts to avoid

long-running operations.

5. Seed Data Strategically:

o Use the HasData method for initial data setup, but avoid large
data sets in migrations.

csharp

CopyEdit

modelBuilder.Entity<Role>().HasData(new Role { Id = 1, Name =

"Admin" });

6. Migration Execution:

o Automate migrations using CI/CD pipelines and environment-

specific configuration.

24. Discuss Best Practices for Managing Database Connections in EF

Core

1. Use Dependency Injection:

o Register DbContext with appropriate lifetime based on the

application:

csharp

CopyEdit

services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(options =>

options.UseSqlServer(connectionString));

2. Connection Pooling:

o Leverage pooling to minimize connection overhead in high-load

scenarios.

csharp

This information/document has been classified: Personal

CopyEdit

options.UseSqlServer(connectionString, sqlOptions =>

sqlOptions.EnableRetryOnFailure());

3. Close Connections Gracefully:

o Ensure Dispose() is called for DbContext to release resources.

4. Limit Connections:

o Configure connection limits in the database to avoid bottlenecks.

5. Retry Policies:

o Use retry policies to handle transient failures.

csharp

CopyEdit

options.EnableRetryOnFailure(maxRetryCount: 5);

6. Async Operations:

o Use asynchronous database calls to prevent thread blocking.

csharp

CopyEdit

var user = await context.Users.FirstOrDefaultAsync(u => u.Id == 1);

25. How Would You Handle Bulk Inserts/Updates in EF Core?

1. EF Core Bulk Extensions:

o Use third-party libraries like EFCore.BulkExtensions for high

performance.

csharp

CopyEdit

await context.BulkInsertAsync(entities);

2. Batch Processing:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o Split operations into batches for large data sets to reduce
memory usage.

csharp

CopyEdit

foreach (var batch in entities.Batch(1000))

context.AddRange(batch);

await context.SaveChangesAsync();

3. SQL Operations:

o For large-scale operations, execute raw SQL commands.

csharp

CopyEdit

await context.Database.ExecuteSqlRawAsync("INSERT INTO Table ...");

4. Disable Change Tracking:

o Use AsNoTracking or detach entities to improve bulk

performance.

csharp

CopyEdit

context.ChangeTracker.AutoDetectChangesEnabled = false;

5. Optimize SaveChanges:

o Call SaveChanges() only after bulk operations to minimize

context overhead.

csharp

CopyEdit

context.SaveChanges();

Key Takeaway

This information/document has been classified: Personal

Highlight your expertise in optimizing EF Core for high performance, scalable
applications by leveraging best practices, libraries, and advanced
configurations. Emphasize your ability to handle complex database scenarios
with precision and efficiency.

Microservices and Architecture

26. How Would You Design a Microservices Architecture Using

ASP.NET Core?

Designing microservices in ASP.NET Core involves decomposing a large

monolithic application into small, independently deployable services, each
responsible for a specific business capability. Key design considerations:

 Service Boundaries: Identify bounded contexts from domain-driven

design (DDD). Each microservice owns its own data and logic.

 Technology Stack: Use ASP.NET Core Web API for lightweight, cross-
platform microservices, leveraging built-in dependency injection,
configuration, and middleware.

 Data Management: Each microservice manages its own

database/schema to ensure loose coupling and data encapsulation.

 Communication: Implement RESTful APIs or gRPC for synchronous

calls; use messaging/event-driven architecture for async
communication.

 Service Discovery: Integrate with tools like Consul or Eureka for

dynamic service registration and discovery.

 Security: Centralize authentication and authorization via

OAuth2/OpenID Connect providers; use JWT tokens for secure service-
to-service communication.

 Resilience and Scalability: Implement retries, circuit breakers (using

Polly), and load balancing to improve fault tolerance.

 CI/CD Pipelines: Automate build, test, and deployment for

independent services using tools like Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, or
Jenkins.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

  Containerization & Orchestration: Package microservices as Docker
containers and orchestrate with Kubernetes or Azure AKS for scalability
and management.

27. What Are the Pros and Cons of Monolithic vs. Microservices
Architecture?

Aspect Monolithic Microservices

Easier to develop, test, and Highly scalable and flexible;

deploy initially; simpler independent deployment;
Pros
debugging; fewer cross- technology heterogeneity; fault
cutting concerns. isolation.

Can become a large, tightly Increased complexity in

coupled codebase; harder to deployment and management;
Cons scale specific parts; slower distributed system challenges
deployments; challenging to (network latency, fault tolerance);
adopt new tech. requires strong DevOps culture.

Performan Lower latency due to in- Potential higher latency due to

ce process calls. network communication.

Monolithic scaling is vertical Microservices scale horizontally

Scalability
(scale the whole app). and independently.

28. How Do You Implement Inter-Service Communication in ASP.NET

Core?

 RESTful HTTP APIs:

o Most common, simple to implement.

o Use HttpClientFactory for efficient, resilient HTTP calls.

o Good for synchronous request-response patterns.

 gRPC:

o High-performance, low-latency communication using HTTP/2 and

Protocol Buffers.

o Suitable for internal, intra-data-center communication.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o Supports streaming scenarios.

 Message Brokers (Asynchronous Messaging):

o Use RabbitMQ, Azure Service Bus, Kafka for event-driven

architecture.

o Improves decoupling and scalability.

o Enables eventual consistency with publish-subscribe or queue-

based patterns.

 SignalR:

o For real-time bi-directional communication where needed.

29. Explain the Role of API Gateways in Microservices Architecture.

How Would You Implement One?

 Role:

o Acts as a single entry point for clients to interact with multiple

microservices.

o Handles cross-cutting concerns such as authentication, rate

limiting, logging, request routing, and response aggregation.

o Simplifies client architecture by offloading service discovery and

protocol translation.

o Enables security policies and caching centrally.

 Implementation:

o Use Ocelot in ASP.NET Core: a popular lightweight API Gateway.

o Configure routing, authentication, and load balancing in the

ocelot.json config file.

o Alternatively, use cloud-native gateways like Azure API

Management, AWS API Gateway, or Kong.

o Integrate middleware for logging, throttling, and security.

csharp

CopyEdit

This information/document has been classified: Personal

public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)

app.UseOcelot().Wait();

30. How Would You Implement Distributed Logging and Tracing in a

Microservices Environment?

 Distributed Logging:

o Centralize logs using tools like ELK Stack (Elasticsearch,

Logstash, Kibana) or Azure Monitor, Splunk, Seq.

o Use structured logging with Serilog or NLog, enriching logs with

contextual data like service name, trace IDs.

o Implement correlation IDs passed through HTTP headers to track

requests end-to-end.

 Distributed Tracing:

o Use OpenTelemetry or Application Insights to collect

telemetry data across services.

o Trace calls spanning multiple services using correlation IDs.

o Visualize traces to identify latency bottlenecks and errors.

 Implementation:

o Inject middleware to assign and propagate correlation IDs.

o Use diagnostic libraries (e.g., System.Diagnostics.Activity) and

OpenTelemetry instrumentation in ASP.NET Core.

o Integrate with monitoring dashboards to analyze performance

and failures.

Summary

As a senior developer, I design microservices with ASP.NET Core focusing on

modularity, scalability, and resilience. I choose inter-service communication
methods based on latency and coupling requirements and implement API

This information/document has been classified: Personal

gateways to streamline client interactions and security. I emphasize robust
distributed logging and tracing to monitor complex, distributed
environments, ensuring maintainability and operational excellence at scale.

Cloud and DevOps Integration

31. How Would You Deploy an ASP.NET Core Application to

Azure/AWS?

Azure Deployment:

 App Service: The most common and straightforward way to deploy is

to Azure App Service.

o Publish directly from Visual Studio or via CLI (az webapp deploy).

o Supports continuous deployment via GitHub, Azure DevOps, or

Bitbucket.

o Easily scale vertically and horizontally.

o Supports staging slots for zero-downtime deployments.

 Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS):

o Containerize ASP.NET Core app with Docker.

o Deploy containers to AKS for microservices or complex

deployments.

o Use Helm charts for release management.

 Azure Virtual Machines:

o Manually provision VMs and deploy ASP.NET Core apps as self-

hosted services.

o More control but more management overhead.

AWS Deployment:

 Elastic Beanstalk:

o Platform-as-a-Service for easy deployment.

o Upload your build package; AWS handles provisioning, load

balancing, and scaling.

 Amazon ECS / EKS:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o Use ECS for container orchestration with Docker.

o EKS (managed Kubernetes) for Kubernetes-based container

orchestration.

 AWS Lambda with API Gateway:

o Host serverless ASP.NET Core applications for event-driven

scenarios.

32. What Is the Role of Docker and Kubernetes in Deploying ASP.NET

Core Applications?

 Docker:

o Enables containerization of ASP.NET Core applications, bundling

app and dependencies into lightweight, portable images.

o Ensures environment consistency across development, testing,

and production.

o Facilitates microservices by isolating each service in its container.

 Kubernetes:

o Orchestrates and manages containerized applications at scale.

o Handles service discovery, load balancing, rolling updates, and

self-healing.

o Enables declarative deployment and scalability for ASP.NET Core

microservices.

Together, Docker provides the packaging, Kubernetes manages deployment

and scaling.

33. Explain How to Configure CI/CD Pipelines for ASP.NET Core

Applications

 Use tools like Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, Jenkins, or GitLab

CI.

 CI Pipeline:

o Checkout source code.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o Restore NuGet packages.

o Build and run unit tests.

o Publish artifacts (e.g., DLLs, Docker images).

 CD Pipeline:

o Deploy to test/staging environment (App Service, AKS, ECS).

o Run integration or smoke tests.

o Approve and deploy to production.

o Use infrastructure-as-code tools like ARM templates, Terraform,

or Helm for environment provisioning.

 Automate rollback on failures and implement blue-green or canary

deployments for zero downtime.

34. How Do You Manage Configuration Secrets in ASP.NET Core

Applications?

 Azure Key Vault / AWS Secrets Manager:

o Store secrets securely outside the app.

o Use SDK or configuration providers to inject secrets at runtime.

 User Secrets (Development Only):

o Use the built-in user secrets manager during development.

 Environment Variables:

o Use environment variables in container or cloud environments for

secret injection.

 Configuration Providers:

o Use IConfiguration abstraction in ASP.NET Core to load secrets

seamlessly.

 Always avoid storing secrets in source control or configuration files.

35. How Would You Use Azure Functions or AWS Lambda with
ASP.NET Core?

This information/document has been classified: Personal

  Azure Functions:

o Write lightweight, event-driven functions.

o Use the Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Functions SDK.

o Trigger functions via HTTP, queues, timers, or events.

o Use dependency injection and share code with ASP.NET Core

apps.

o Great for serverless APIs, background jobs, or microservices

extensions.

 AWS Lambda:

o Use AWS Lambda .NET Core runtime to run ASP.NET Core-

based serverless functions.

o Triggered by API Gateway, S3 events, DynamoDB streams, etc.

o Package with AWS tools or Docker for deployment.

o Enables scalable, cost-effective compute for sporadic workloads.

Summary

With 17+ years of experience, I leverage cloud platforms like Azure and AWS
to deploy and scale ASP.NET Core applications efficiently. Docker and
Kubernetes are pivotal for modern containerized deployments, while CI/CD
pipelines automate quality and delivery. Secure secrets management and
serverless integrations (Azure Functions/AWS Lambda) complement scalable,
resilient, and cost-effective architectures.

Frontend Integration

36. How Do You Integrate an Angular or React Frontend with an

ASP.NET Core Backend?

 Separate Projects with API Communication:

o Typically, the frontend (Angular or React) is developed as a

standalone Single Page Application (SPA) hosted on a CDN, static
file server, or separate domain.

o The ASP.NET Core backend exposes RESTful APIs or GraphQL

endpoints consumed by the frontend via HTTP calls.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o Use HttpClient (Angular) or fetch/Axios (React) for API calls.

o Secure API endpoints with JWT tokens or cookies for

authentication.

 Hosting Frontend with ASP.NET Core:

o Optionally, serve the Angular/React app as static files from the

wwwroot folder.

o Use the UseSpa middleware in ASP.NET Core to integrate SPA

development server during development and serve compiled
assets in production.

 Development Experience:

o Enable CORS or proxy API requests to the backend during

development for smooth integration.

o Use environment-based configuration to manage API URLs.

37. What Are the Pros and Cons of Server-Side Rendering vs. Client-
Side Rendering in ASP.NET Core?

Client-Side Rendering
Aspect Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
(CSR)

Performanc Faster initial load, especially on Slower initial load due to JS

e slow devices/networks bundle download

Better SEO support, as full HTML Poor SEO without additional

SEO
is rendered on server setup (like prerendering)

User Initial content appears faster, but Faster client-side navigation

Experience subsequent navigation slower after initial load

More complex setup; needs server Simpler setup; leverages

Complexity
resources browser for rendering

Cache static assets and API

Caching Can cache rendered HTML on CDN
responses

 ASP.NET Core supports SSR via frameworks like Blazor Server,

ReactJS.NET, or Angular Universal.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

38. How Would You Implement a Web API in ASP.NET Core That
Supports Both REST and GraphQL?

 Separate Endpoints:

o Expose REST APIs using controllers with [ApiController] attributes

and HTTP verbs.

o Implement GraphQL using libraries like HotChocolate or

GraphQL.NET.

o Host GraphQL endpoint (e.g., /graphql) alongside REST API

routes.

 Shared Business Logic:

o Extract business logic into services reusable by both REST and

GraphQL layers to avoid duplication.

 Example:

csharp

CopyEdit

app.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>

endpoints.MapControllers(); // REST API

endpoints.MapGraphQL("/graphql"); // GraphQL endpoint

});

 GraphQL allows clients to request exactly what they need, reducing

over-fetching compared to REST.

39. How Do You Handle CORS Issues When Integrating Front-End

and Back-End Applications?

 Enable CORS in ASP.NET Core:

csharp

CopyEdit

services.AddCors(options =>

This information/document has been classified: Personal

{

options.AddPolicy("AllowFrontend", builder =>

builder.WithOrigins("https://yourfrontenddomain.com")

.AllowAnyMethod()

.AllowAnyHeader()

.AllowCredentials();

});

});

 Apply policy in Configure:

csharp

CopyEdit

app.UseCors("AllowFrontend");

 For development, you can allow localhost origins.

 Always restrict origins and HTTP methods in production for security.

 Alternatively, proxy API requests in the frontend development server to

avoid CORS during development.

40. Discuss SPA Pre-Rendering and Its Importance in ASP.NET Core

Applications

 SPA Pre-Rendering generates the initial HTML markup on the server

before sending it to the client, improving perceived performance and
SEO.

 In ASP.NET Core:

o Angular Universal or React SSR solutions can be integrated with

ASP.NET Core middleware.

o Pre-rendered HTML loads faster and is crawlable by search

engines.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o After initial load, the SPA hydrates and becomes fully interactive
on the client side.

 Benefits:

o Faster Time to First Meaningful Paint (TTFMP).

o Better SEO without requiring client-side JavaScript execution.

o Improved accessibility for users with JavaScript disabled.

Summary

Integrating Angular or React with ASP.NET Core involves clear separation of

concerns with API communication and optionally hosting the frontend within
ASP.NET Core. Choosing SSR vs CSR impacts performance, SEO, and
complexity. Supporting both REST and GraphQL APIs allows flexibility for
clients. CORS must be carefully configured to enable secure cross-origin
calls. SPA pre-rendering bridges the gap between rich client apps and
SEO/performance needs, making it essential for production-grade SPAs.

Scalability and High Availability

41. How Would You Design an ASP.NET Core Application to Handle

High Traffic?

 Stateless Design:
Architect the app to be stateless where possible, meaning no reliance
on in-memory session state or server affinity. This facilitates scaling
out across multiple servers.

 Asynchronous Programming:
Use async/await throughout to efficiently handle I/O-bound operations
and maximize thread usage.

 Caching:
Implement caching at multiple layers (response caching, in-memory,
distributed cache like Redis) to reduce database hits and improve
response times.

 Optimize Database Access:

Use efficient querying, pagination, indexing, and connection pooling.
Offload heavy queries to read replicas or caches.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

  Use CDN for Static Content:
Serve static assets like JS, CSS, images via CDNs to reduce server load.

 Use a Message Queue:

For expensive or long-running operations, use background processing
with queues (e.g., RabbitMQ, Azure Service Bus).

 Health Checks and Monitoring:

Integrate health checks and telemetry (Application Insights,
Prometheus) for proactive monitoring.

42. What Strategies Do You Use for Horizontal and Vertical Scaling
in ASP.NET Core?

 Horizontal Scaling (Scaling Out):

o Deploy multiple instances of the ASP.NET Core app behind a load

balancer.

o Use stateless design to allow load balancer to route requests

freely.

o Utilize distributed caching and shared storage (databases,

session stores).

o Use container orchestration (Kubernetes, Docker Swarm) for

automated scaling.

 Vertical Scaling (Scaling Up):

o Increase server resources (CPU, RAM).

o Optimize application code and database queries to make the

best use of hardware.

o Use IIS or Kestrel tuning (thread pool, max concurrent

connections).

o Vertical scaling is simpler but has physical limits and can be

costlier.

43. Explain How to Implement Load Balancing in an ASP.NET Core

Application

This information/document has been classified: Personal

  Load Balancer Types:

o Software Load Balancers: IIS ARR, NGINX, HAProxy.

o Cloud Load Balancers: Azure Load Balancer, AWS ELB/ALB.

o Hardware Load Balancers: F5, Citrix ADC.

 Implementation Details:

o Deploy multiple ASP.NET Core instances behind the load

balancer.

o Use health probes for monitoring instance health.

o Use session affinity only if absolutely necessary; otherwise keep

the app stateless.

o For containerized apps, leverage Kubernetes service load

balancing.

 Kestrel Considerations:

o Kestrel works best behind a reverse proxy that handles TLS

termination and load balancing.

o Configure forwarded headers middleware to handle proxy

headers correctly.

44. How Do You Ensure Fault Tolerance in Your ASP.NET Core

Applications?

 Graceful Degradation:
Design services to fail gracefully, returning appropriate fallback
responses or cached data.

 Retry Policies & Circuit Breakers:

Use Polly library for retry, circuit breaker, bulkhead isolation patterns to
handle transient failures, especially when calling external services.

 Health Checks:
Implement ASP.NET Core health checks to monitor the status of
dependencies (databases, external services) and enable load balancers
to route traffic away from unhealthy instances.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

  Redundancy:
Deploy multiple instances across different availability zones or regions
to minimize impact of data center outages.

 Exception Handling & Logging:

Centralized logging and alerting for quick issue detection and
resolution.

45. Discuss the Role of Distributed Caching in High-Availability

Systems

 Why Distributed Cache?

In a horizontally scaled environment, distributed caching (e.g., Redis,
Memcached, Azure Cache for Redis) allows sharing cached data
between instances, avoiding stale or inconsistent cache states.

 Benefits:

o Reduces load on the database and backend services.

o Improves response times and throughput.

o Enables cache invalidation strategies that propagate across all

app instances.

o Provides fault tolerance with clustered or replicated cache

setups.

 Implementation Tips:

o Cache frequently accessed but rarely changed data.

o Use appropriate expiration policies.

o Combine with messaging for cache invalidation or data

synchronization.

Summary

To handle high traffic in ASP.NET Core, I focus on stateless, asynchronous,

and cache-optimized design, enabling both vertical and horizontal scaling.
Load balancing is critical and implemented via cloud or software proxies with
health checks. Fault tolerance is ensured with retries, circuit breakers,
redundancy, and robust logging. Distributed caching plays a vital role in

This information/document has been classified: Personal

maintaining performance and consistency in a scalable, high-availability
architecture.

Miscellaneous

46. What Are Some Common Pitfalls in ASP.NET Core Development,

and How Do You Avoid Them?

 Improper Dependency Injection Scope:

Using wrong service lifetimes (e.g., injecting scoped services into
singleton) can cause memory leaks or unexpected behaviors.
Avoidance: Understand lifetimes (Transient, Scoped, Singleton) and use
constructor injection correctly.

 Ignoring Async Best Practices:

Blocking async code or mixing sync/async can cause thread starvation
or deadlocks.
Avoidance: Always use async all the way down and avoid .Result
or .Wait().

 Inadequate Error Handling:

Not implementing global exception handling or logging leads to poor
diagnostics.
Avoidance: Use middleware for centralized error handling and
structured logging (Serilog, NLog).

 Neglecting Security Best Practices:

Improper CORS setup, no HTTPS enforcement, or weak authentication
can lead to vulnerabilities.
Avoidance: Configure strict CORS, enforce HTTPS, implement robust
authentication/authorization.

 Misconfigured Middleware Order:

Middleware order matters and wrong order breaks functionality (e.g.,
UseRouting must come before UseEndpoints).
Avoidance: Follow official docs and carefully order middleware
components.

47. How Do You Manage Versioning in ASP.NET Core APIs?

 Approaches:

This information/document has been classified: Personal

 o URL Path Versioning: e.g., /api/v1/products

o Query String Versioning: e.g., /api/products?api-version=1.0

o Header Versioning: Custom headers like api-version: 1.0

o Media Type Versioning: Using Accept headers.

 Implementation:
Use the official Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Versioning package to
implement flexible versioning strategies, supporting multiple schemes.

 Best Practices:

o Maintain backward compatibility.

o Deprecate versions with clear communication.

o Use semantic versioning.

o Document API versions via Swagger/OpenAPI.

48. Explain the Differences Between .NET Framework and .NET Core

Aspect .NET Framework .NET Core (including .NET 5/6/7)

Cross-platform (Windows, Linux,

Cross-platform Windows-only
macOS)

Open-source Mostly closed-source Fully open-source

Installed globally on
Deployment Self-contained deployment option
Windows

Performance Slower, monolithic High-performance, modular

Larger but Windows- Smaller but growing, more modern

API Surface
centric APIs

Container
Limited Native container support
Support

Side-by-side Supported, multiple runtime versions

Difficult
Versions on same machine

This information/document has been classified: Personal

49. How Would You Handle Real-Time Communication in ASP.NET
Core (e.g., SignalR)?

 Use SignalR, a real-time communication library built into ASP.NET Core

for bi-directional communication between client and server.

 Key Features:

o Supports WebSockets, fallback to Server-Sent Events or Long

Polling.

o Manages connection lifetime and groups.

o Supports broadcasting and targeted messaging.

 Typical Use Cases: Chat apps, live dashboards, notifications, gaming.

 Implementation Steps:

o Add SignalR NuGet package.

o Configure SignalR hub classes on the server.

o Map SignalR routes in middleware.

o Use JavaScript/TypeScript client SDK for frontend integration.

50. What Are the New Features in the Latest Version of ASP.NET
Core That You’ve Worked With?

(Adjust based on the current latest version, e.g., ASP.NET Core 7 or 8

preview)

 Minimal APIs Enhancements:

Cleaner syntax for lightweight APIs with improved route handling and
OpenAPI support.

 Rate Limiting Middleware:

Built-in middleware for request throttling and preventing abuse.

 Output Caching:
Native output caching middleware for better response performance.

 Improved Hot Reload:

Faster developer productivity with real-time code updates without
restarting.

This information/document has been classified: Personal

  Enhanced gRPC Support:
Better integration with HTTP/3 and improved performance.

 New .NET MAUI Blazor Hybrid Integration:

Building cross-platform desktop/mobile apps with Blazor components.

Summary

Having deep experience in ASP.NET Core, I avoid common pitfalls by

adhering to best practices in DI, async, security, and middleware
management. I use flexible API versioning techniques with official packages.
Understanding the evolution from .NET Framework to .NET Core shapes my
architecture choices. For real-time needs, SignalR offers a robust solution.
Finally, I keep up-to-date with recent ASP.NET Core improvements like
minimal APIs, built-in rate limiting, and output caching to continuously
enhance app performance and developer productivity.

This information/document has been classified: Personal