Lester Korzilius: March 1999
Lester Korzilius: March 1999
Lester Korzilius: March 1999
Introduction
Place is an important concept in architecture. It is my contention that the grounding afforded by time and location profoundly affects the interpretation and meaning of architecture. This grounding in the world is a vital component for the resonance and importance of architecture for human beings. This is contrasted to those concepts that place the universal or absolute as a central element of their architectural philosophy. Different cultures through time have shown different interpretations of place, and this is reflected in their built environment. Two aspects of this are of particular interest. First, man is constructing a physical environment in order to give himself a place in the world. This ranges from the archetypal primitive hut (fig 4) through to the pyramids (fig 1). Both examples show, in very different degrees, a spiritual foothold that man is making in an otherwise anonymous and rootless world. The other interesting aspect reflected in the built environment is the concretisation of a way of looking at the world. The pyramids, the Acropolis, and the roman temples (figs 1-3) show a range of interpretations regarding mans permanence on earth, the afterlife, social relationships to other men, and the relationship to the spiritual. Change these interpretations, and the resulting built environment will change. The concentration of power within a society will obviously affect what is built, but regardless of this, the messages and meanings contained within this built environment must be intelligible to the majority of that particular society. While mans world view will strongly affect the physical construction of a place, the reverse is not necessarily true. For example, a society that does not believe in the afterlife will not derive the same meaning from the pyramids as those who built them. If they had a Platonic world view, they might look at these pyramids as perfect forms, and derive an aesthetic pleasure from a perception that, in and of themselves, a beauty emanates from the geometric perfection of the form. The sense of grounding and place-making afforded by the pyramids would therefore be different. On the other hand, there will be elements of places that are common to all men, irrespective of time or society. These will be elements that respond to elemental
Fig 2 - Temple of Vesta, Rome
physical or psychic components of man himself. Direction, gravity, horizon, light, warmth, security, fear, and sex are but some of these shared human components. Before looking further at these concepts, it would be useful to look at the concept of the universal. In the words of Plato: I do not mean by beauty of form such beauty as that of animals or pictures, which the many would suppose to be my meaning; buts, says the argument, understand me to mean straight lines and circles, and the plane or solid figures . . . for these I affirm to be not only relatively beautiful, like other things, but they are eternally or absolutely beautiful . . .1 While the subject discussed is beauty, a position of man relative to the world is inferred. That is that there is, outside and independent of man, a fixed and absolute. Whether this is perceived by man or not, does not change the nature of this absolute. In the 1750s Marc-Antoine Laugier in his treatise on architecture stated that absolute beauty is inherent in architecture independent of mental habit and human prejudice. 2 In more modern times Le Corbusier wrote that: Architecture is a thing of art, a phenomenon of the emotions, lying outside questions of construction and beyond them. The purpose of construction is to make things hold together; of architecture to move us. Architectural emotion exists when the work rings within us in tune with a universe whose laws we obey, recognize and respect. When certain harmonies have been attained, the work captures us. Architecture is a mater of harmonies, it is a pure creation of the spirit. 3 Taken together, the above concepts argue that the meanings derived either from or through architecture are universal in nature, not rooted in time, and are not dependent upon place to derive its meaning. Martin Heidegger in Being and Time makes an argument for a place-centric approach. He discusses the concept of Dasein, which he describes as being in
Fig 4 - Architypal primitive hut from Laugiers Essay on Architecture Fig 5 - Vitruvian man Fig 3 - Acropolis, plan
space. The world is experienced through our bodies, and we can not separate our selves from this world. In other words, the physical world is an integral part of our existence and the basis of our perceptions. For Heidegger, regions, whether a room or a city, assign a place where man can dwell in the world. These regions carry meanings. Heidegger further discusses an orientation to space such as up and down, left and right. This orientation is relative to the body and the world. It is not an absolute in the sense of Plato. Man is situated in the world, and dwells between earth and sky. Man is part of a fourfold continuum of earth, sky, mortals and divinities. In a more architectural essay, Building Dwelling Thinking, Heidegger argues that building /dwelling is the means by which man places himself in this fourfold. Buildings give a form to this dwelling and its presencing. He refers to the Greek word techne which means to make something appear. While not specifically referenced, the Greek theatre and temple at Delphi (fig 6) seems to be a good example of the fourfold presencing in the world there is made to appear a place where man and the cosmos are joined together, on the earth beneath the sky. The philosophies of Heidegger, have been adapted by several architectural theorists including Christian Norberg-Shulz and Kenneth Frampton. In particular, the ideas of dwelling in the world and the techne of making something appear have special resonance. Both theorists acknowledge Heideggers influence, but their interpretations and theories are different, not least because their theories are architecturally specific, while Heidggers theories were more general. Frampton discusses a theory of critical regionalism. He feels that particular aspects of a place are expressed through a tectonic expression of the building/ space. The tactile is important in the perception of this built form. In a later work, Studies in Tectonic Culture, a quote of Louis Kahn describes much of Framptons views: Space is architectural when the evidence of how it is made is seen and comprehended. 4 Christian Norberg-Shulz invokes the concept of Genius Loci. He speaks of
Fig 7 - Sea Ranch from Norberg-Shulzs Meaning and Place Fig 8 - Musee des Travaux (A Perret, arch) from Framptons Studies in Tectonic Culture 4
Fig 10 - Altes Museum, Berlin (KF Schinklel, arch) from Studies in Tectonic Culture
architecture as concretizing the nature of a place. He uses varied examples such as the Saqqara pyramid and the Sea Ranch complex in California (figs 1, 7) to demonstrate architecturally what he feels is the nature of the site. He speaks of man-made places relating to nature in three evolutionary ways: first, that man visualises his understanding of nature; second, that man symbolises his understanding of nature; and finally, that man creates a micro-cosmos from his understanding of the world. Both Frampton and Norberg-Shulz use examples of Jorn Utzons work to demonstrate their arguments. There is in modern times a certain cult of the individual, e.g., referring to Utzons Sydney Opera House or Scharouns Philharmonic Hall. Unfortunately this way of analysing is unsatisfactory when it comes to issues of place. It is unsatisfactory because many social and historical issues are ignored issues that have much to do with defining what a place is. The subject of history and memory relative to place is vast, and can only be touched on in a essay of this length. The philosophies noted above show a range in approach from a view of the absolute to a phenomenological place-centred approach. In support of the latter view, there are a number of further points to consider.
unique in its identity. This uniqueness is part of the societys memory. Without the grounding of place, this memory would not exist. This societal memory will strongly influence the man-made environment. Some aspects of this memory will relate to the physical characteristics of the place. For example, light is a precious resource in the Scandinavian countries, and there are similarities in approaches between Scandinavian architects. Alvar Aaltos Seinajoki library is characteristic of many of these attributes. Light is a precious resource whose presence is of fundamental importance in the experience of the building (figs 22, 23). Contrast this to buildings in the Latin countries, where the colour temperature and amount of light are very different than in the Scandinavian countries. Mexican architects such as Luis Barragan (figs 19, 20) and others have built a number of projects where strong and vivid colours are integral aspects of the design. In these places, light is strong and plentiful. The appearance and feel between the Mexican and Scandinavian buildings is readily apparent. Another aspect of place is the manner in which buildings are constructed. This includes the materials, their arrangement and composition, and the amount of craftsmanship. Through time, these buildings form the norm against which new buildings are conceived, constructed, and evaluated by that society. Several aspects make up the manner of construction, including relative wealth of a society, the amount of industrialisation, and social stratification. The norm is formed partially by habit, but also by virtue that buildings constructed in that manner are more readily achievable in that society, due to the social and technological infrastructure. Each in turn then reinforces the other. The materials used in construction have often materials that were readily available. These materials then form part of the tradition, and can be seen in vernacular and designed architecture. A desert fortress in Morocco (fig 29) is built with indigenous masonry. The western United States is plentiful with timber, and buildings constructed of wood frame are common (fig 26). Much of England has a strong tradition of stone and masonry construction (fig 27). These materials, being in common use will become a norm used by people in considering a place. However, the materials of a place go beyond strict supply and demand equations. More importantly is the acceptance of a norm of the mateFig 21 - Amphitheaters of Muyu-uray. Peru Fig 20 - Macchu Picchu
rials. These then begin to have associations and references that are common among the society, e.g., that a stone house represents home and solidity, or that glass and steel are free, modern and open. To the extent that the materials are indigenous, this is one element of many that begins to contribute to a uniqueness of place. The psychological component of a house has been explored in depth by Gaston Bachelard. He argues that our first houses, when we are young, form a psychological base that we use later in life when we evaluate not only our homes, but our place in the world. Without going further into these arguments, the point I wish to extract is that the feel of a place, whether it be in materials, style of construction, etc forms a part of the collective subconscious of that society. While these materials or style of construction may exist for very practical reasons, e.g., availability of materials, climate, etc., these practical reasons are then further reinforced by psychological reasons as the society builds new spaces for itself. These psychological reasons are often more powerful that strictly practical reasons, as demonstrated by the example (later in this paper) of the urban siting of the Berlin Philharmonic Hall. The concept of place includes private, public and urban spaces. As the concept of what is meant by private, public, and urban changes through time, so will change the nature of the resulting places. Figs 32 and 33 show the Piazza del Campo in Sienna, and mid-town Manhattan. The way that people interact is different. In Sienna, the piazza is a communal space where people can gather, and it is a focus of the community. New York urban spaces are less communal, by which I mean that in public life there is less direct interaction between people. The streets are more of a means of getting from one place to another. Sienna is integrated into the natural environs whereas Manhattan is a man-made construct whose references are not oriented in nature. While the physical environment will influence peoples actions, it was rather peoples actions that influenced the design of these public spaces. The built environment will concretise the values held by that society. Cultural institutions such as courts, museums, hospitals, schools, libraries, etc exist because they are in accordance with the value systems of those elements of society that have the power to see their implementation, either directly or
Fig 29 - Desert fortress in southern Morocco
10
indirectly. The design of each institution, in turn, is influenced by these values. The role of the afterlife, and the concept of a ruler as a god strongly define Egyptian monuments such as Queen Hatshepsuts temple and the temple of Abu Simbel (figs 30 and 31). An important function of places and buildings is to provide a psychological anchor between the individual and the world. Without this connection, the individual is rootless and feels out of place. These concretised spaces provide a tactile link to the outside world. Together with social relations with other humans beings, this forms the mediating link between the individual and the outside world.
11
12
13
Centraal Beheer Offices 1967, 1970-72 (H. Hertzberger arch) The building is the headquarters for a major Dutch insurance company, and works in a very different way from a typical office building. There is a convincing integration of community and working life. This is seen in the open floor plan, the connecting voids through floor levels, the public streets, and the many informal meeting spaces in the building. In what is perhaps both a strength and a flaw, the building is inwardly focused and its form is generated by its internal ideas. The exterior is undifferentiated, and it very difficult to find the entry. There is very little integration of the exterior environment into the interior of this office. In part this can be explained by the relatively monotonous surroundings, but more importantly I think it is due to the nature of the design idea. In this sense it is similar to Wrights Johnson Wax offices where the influence of the external world is shunned and the focus is spend on creating an internal environment. This same idea however is very powerful, and goes a long way towards creating a micro-cosmos that roots man into the world. By this I mean the building provides a place where the world of work is integrated into daily life in a meaningful and positive way. The success of building depends on the world view on the architect, and the rigorous application of these principles throughout the design.
Fig 41 - Centrall Beheer (CB); Floor plan Fig 42 - CB; Street
14
Saynatsalo Town Hall 1950-52 (A. Aalto, arch) The Saynatsalo Town Hall is a modest building in size and cost, but through some simple devices manages to underscore and amplify the institutional role of this building. The entry into the town hall is one floor above grade level. An outdoor podium is created that one reaches in a controlled, framed manner via a stair run of stairs. Physically, there is no reason to elevate the entry into the town hall. Psychologically however, the elevated platform literally and figuratively raises the building above the everyday profane world of the surrounding town. The character of the podium is further emphasized by the irregular cascading stairs which are not meant to be used, but rather visually reinforce the hilltop characteristic of the building. The council chamber is the heart of the design, and is given suitable expression in physical terms. Fig 46 shows the massing and high pitched roof that stand out. The procession, or architectural promenade, further reinforces the psychic importance given this chamber. The council chamber is one level again higher than the already elevated entry. The corridor leading to the chamber (fig 40) is processional and underscores the importance of the room being entered. The sequence from the street, to the entry, and up to the council chamber is, at the risk of an overblown metaphor, an ascension from the profane to the sacred. Additionally, there is a tactile presence to the building that helps the individual physically connect and identify with the town hall. Fig 47 shows the handrail detail, to which significant attention has been given, crafting and proportioning it to the human hand. This attitude and emphasis is carried through in many of the details such as brick patterns, the council chamber ceiling, and the articulation of different materials. This tactile connection is important because it aids in integrating the individual into place created by the building.
Fig 47 - STH; Handrail detail
15
16
17
The main living areas are contained in three pavilions. One aspect of the pavilions was to maximise the setting and views in the natural landscape. The orientation of the pavilions and their glazing is such that one pavilion does not block the views of another. A perimeter trellis/skylight allows modulated light into the rear of the pavilions, and enhances the sheltered-yet-open atmosphere that was part of the design intent.
Fig 58 - SH; Views Fig 59 - SH; Spatial hierarchy
18
19
20