It For Managers Project - 1 Knowledge Management
It For Managers Project - 1 Knowledge Management
It For Managers Project - 1 Knowledge Management
TEAM NUMBER 11 TEAM MEMBERS: Abhishek Majumdar Amol Madhavrao Chopade Rakesh Prasad Sathish Vinay Krishna
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to Prof. Butchi Babu for introducing IT FOR MANAGERS to us and for giving us a chance to do this project. We are grateful for his continuous support without which this project would not have been completed. I express my sincere gratitude to my parents, friends and all others who have directly or indirectly inspired and helped me to complete my project with unremitting zeal and enthusiasm.
Contents
S.No 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Introduction Perception Of Knowledge Management Knowledge Management Why Knowledge Management Concepts Of Knowledge Management Role Of IT In Successful Knowledge Management Implementation Of Knowledge Management Knowledge Management In Wipro Conclusion References Contents Page No. 4 5 7 9 11 14 15 17 20 21
INTRODUCTION
This project claims that information technology is and will be quite helpful for knowledge management, however knowledge science cannot be established only by information science. This project also considers the difference between information and knowledge simply, but considers deeply the power or ability to convert from one to another, which is the ability to understand and learn things, or the ability to think and understand things instinctively or automatically. The growing importance of knowledge as a critical business resource has compelled executives to examine the knowledge underlying their businesses, giving rise to knowledge management (KM) initiatives. Given that advances in information technology (IT) have made it easier to acquire, store, or disseminate knowledge than ever before, many organizations are employing IT to facilitate sharing and integration of knowledge. But considering the complexity of KM initiatives and the variety of IT solutions available on the market, executives must often confront the challenging task of deciding what type of IT solutions to deploy in support of their KM initiatives. This project aims to shed light on the IT-KM match by investigating the role of IT in successful KM initiatives.
11% 3% 8%
13%
65%
However, the respondents were equally divided on whether knowledge management is a new term for what information professionals used to do. Also, a majority of them agree that information management is just an aspect of knowledge management, which is in line with the thinking that information management involves management of explicit knowledge (e.g. documents) while knowledge management involves the management of both explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge. Not surprisingly, there was almost a unanimous agreement that information professionals have important roles to play in knowledge management programs.
Strongly Disagree KM is just another fad 10 like Total Quality (15.9%) Management KM is a new term for 3 what information (4.8%) Professionals were already doing Information 1 management is (1.6%) just another aspect of KM Information professionals have important roles to play in KM programs 0 (0.0%)
13 (20.6%)
3 (4.8%)
36 (57.1%)
36 (57.1%)
0 (0.0%)
2 (3.2%)
30 (47.6%)
31 (49.2%)
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
The term knowledge management was first introduced in a 1986 keynote address to a European management conference (American Productivity and Quality Center 1996). Knowledge management is the name of a concept in which an enterprise consciously and comprehensively gathers, organizes, shares, and analyzes its knowledge in terms of resources, documents, and people skills. Knowledge management involves data mining and some method of operation to push information to users. Some vendors are offering products to help an enterprise inventory and access knowledge resources. KM is the process through which organizations generate value from their intellectual and knowledge-based assets. Most often, generating value from such assets involves codifying what employees, partners and customers know, and sharing that information among employees, departments and even with other companies in an effort to devise best practices. It's important to note that the definition says nothing about technology; while KM is often facilitated by IT, technology by itself is not KM. This term had immediate and vast appeal and, at the same time, spawned strongly felt criticism. The key to the knowledge-based economy is not knowledge-infused products but tacit knowledge that provides the capacity for these knowledgeinfused products and for non-codified knowledge services (Sveiby 1997). The major criticisms of knowledge management are that: It has traditionally conjured up too close an association with information management and information technology (IT). It implies that knowledge can be managed. It tends to be so broad and vague as to have little meaning. It tends to focus on the nuts and bolts of knowledge creation, capture, sharing, use and reuse, rather than providing a true vision and strategy that conveys how knowledge-based enterprises will function and succeed in the new knowledge-based economy.
In addition, more specific criticisms have been levelled at particular views of knowledge management. The most common type of definition describes knowledge management as a set of processes directed at creating-capturing-storing-sharing-applying-reusing knowledge (Sydanmaanlakka 2000). This type of definition is criticized for making knowledge management appear to involve somewhat mechanistic and sequential process steps and for focusing attention on explicit knowledge artifacts as opposed to tacit knowledge. Knowledge engineering reflects this view of knowledge management. A definition with similar problems sees knowledge management as delivering the right knowledge to the right persons at the right time. This definition emphasizes explicit knowledge artifacts over tacit knowledge and ignores knowledge creation. Alternative definitions have been proffered that attempt to better capture the complexities of knowledge and knowledge management. For example, Snowden (2000) defines knowledge management as: The identification, optimization, and active management of intellectual assets, either in the form of explicit knowledge held in artifacts or as tacit knowledge possessed by individuals or communities. The optimization of explicit knowledge is achieved by the consolidating and making available of artifacts. The optimization of tacit knowledge is achieved through the creation of communities to hold, share, and grow the tacit knowledge.
changes in strategic directions and workforce mobility that lead to knowledge loss. New products and innovations are increasing at a faster rate than ever before, along with evolutions in customer preference and need. Managers must no longer investigate their customers superficially; they must dig more deeply than surveys and feedback forms. As organizations have become more complex and information more readily accessible, forward thinking managers have grown concerned with how to allow knowledge to flow freely and how to control and manage this vital flow of information and technology at the same time. The Benefits of Knowledge Management Whether to minimize loss and risk, improve organizational efficiency, or embrace innovation, knowledge management efforts and initiatives add great value to an organization. Some of the benefits of KM include: facilitates better, more informed decisions; contributes to the intellectual capital of an organization; encourages the free flow of ideas which leads to insight and innovation; eliminates redundant processes, streamlines operations, and enhances employee retention rates; improves customer service and efficiency; and leads to greater productivity.
10
Knowledge is everywhere and it is scattered. In knowledge management, the people are treated as assets and they are termed as human assets. Business organizations which have given importance to knowledge have become a success by implementing new knowledge based methods.
Concepts
Leveraging In-tangible Assets: Cultural concepts: Knowledge sharing, Win-Win attitude Collaboration & Networking Listening skills/External outlook Procedural concepts: Knowledge capture Knowledge dissemination Technical concepts: Knowledge storage Knowledge access Group-work, work-flow, collaborative tools
Change Management: Change is inevitable. An organization undergoes change due to so many reasons. It might happen because of environmental, economical, legal, political and technological factors. The organization which adopts change quickly will be able to cope with the new developments. In change management the business becomes sensitive to change. The business might be able to achieve the good results on the basis of how sensitive they were in adapting to changes.
12
Best Practices: The best practices in business mainly consist of a leader who leads the organization. He or she should be able to lead the human assets by example. The best practices include establishing attainable targets, flat management structure, transparent and flawless communication from top to bottom level and vice versa and constructing futuristic plans for generating positive results. Risk Management: Presence of a good risk management system will help in the smooth flow of the business for a longer period. A good risk management system should be able to understand and measure the risks. The management should sketch new policies and the policies have to be executed on the right time to overcome the risks. When the risks are monitor periodically, then the business is able to diminish various kinds of risks. Benchmarking: Benchmarking, in simple terms is the process of setting standards. The set standards are practiced in the future for better productivity both in qualitative and quantitative terms. Knowledge for business: Knowledge is power. The time has gone when people carried their businesses with good old principles. It is time to adopt quality information and knowledge of the related areas to run business in a better way. Advantages The primary advantages are:
The business can get an advantage in the competitive environment by the implementation of knowledge management and The tricky situations and stress of the business are minimized
13
14
15
16
Pre-Implementation Phase
Implementation Phase
Post-Implementation Phase
Qualifying Benefits
Dock Net
Comprehensive repository of all document categories to assist you in various business, client scenarios and other activities It contains a host of documents that includes proposals, whitepapers, presentations etc. with subscriptions and discussion forums Repository aiming to provide single access to all the information, previously available on Sales Support & TeckNet Contributions to DocKNet could come from Verticals and Horizontals o Different verticals deal with different industries o Different horizontals deal with different technologies
Konnect
Platform for collaboration, connecting people (seeking help) to people (withexperience and expertise) Share the tacit knowledge within the organization, above and beyond the explicit knowledge captured in the KNet Repositories Members listed under Konnect are volunteers; membership open to all. Confidentiality is provided to users & experts The deliverables include o Answering queries posted by the user(s) o Ensuring that the right profile is provided in Konnect, making it easier for the user to connect to the right consultant
War Rooms
Virtual space for dispersed team members to collaborate Facilitates document sharing, exchange of information, real-time online discussions, sharing work plans and online updates, monitoring the progress of activities. Access privileges and restrictions exist Only accessible through VPN and Intranet
18
Assess
Recommend
Implement Sustain
Implement KM Plan
Monitor Performance
19
CONCLUSION:
20
References:
1. http://www.wikipedia.org 2. Application On Knowledge Management In Public Administration written by Karl M Wiig. 3. Knowledge Management @ Wipro presented by Wipro Technologies. 4. Methodology Of Knowledge Management Implementation written by V.Bures, University of HRADEC KRALOVE, Faculty of Informatics and Management.
21