Project Monitoring Evaluation and Control

Project Monitoring, Evaluation, and Control
Control is a management function which is the process of monitoring, avaluating and comparing planned results with actual results to determine the progress torward the project cost, schedule, and technical performance objectives, as well as the project's strategic fit with enterprise purposes. It's role is more predictive than investigative and answers the question what may happen according to the management type than what has happened
Steps in control cycle

(1) Establishing standards (4) Taking corrective action (2) Observing performance
(3) Comparing actual performance
Performance standards
Performance standards are based on the project pan, including at minimum the expectations for the project, established in the project objectives, goals, strategies, relative to project cost, schedule, technical specifications and strategic fit. Key standards include: - Scope of work - Project specification - Work packages - Cost estimates and budgets - Quality - Project team satisfaction - Resource utilization
Performance observation
Performance observation is the receipt of the sufficient information about the project to make an intelligent comparison of planned and actual performance Information can be obtained either from formal sources like reports, briefings, participation in review meetings, letters; or from informal sources such as casual conversations, listening to rumors or gossip etc.
Comparing planned and actual performance

During this comparison we have the opportunity to answer three key questions: - How is the project going? - If there are deviations from the project plan, what caused these deviations? - What should be done about these deviations? It is the responsibility of the project team and the senior managers Its the basis for reaching a judgment about the project's status and whether corrective action is required
Corrective action
Corrective action can take the form of replanning, reprogramming or reallocating resources, or changing the way the project is managed and organized Corrective actions center on the cost, schedule, and technical performance parameters Correcting a problem with one of the parameters of the project may have reverberations on one or both of the other parameters, thus alternatives should also be considered
Monitoring and evaluation

Monitoring is to keep track of and to check systematically all project activities. Evaluation is the examination and appraisal of how things are going on the project. Monitoring and avaluation of the project require that the project team look inward to the project and the sponsoring organization as well as outward to the stakeholders and the general system enviroment.
Evaluation
A framework for doing the evaluation can consist of a series of key questions about the project which must be answered on an ongoing basis. Project team meetings should be done regularly so that team members could think about these questions more often Example of questions: - What is going wrong? - What opportunities are emerging?
Success and failure examples

NASA's upper atmosphere research satellite was kept on cost and schedule in part because the project team combined political savvy with technical conservatism to guard the project from controversy. In addition good planning was also a factor in controlling the use of the resources correctly. EOS enviromental satellite was $13 billion above its original cost projections and 5 years behind schedule due to its managers
Management Function Evaluation

Management-related activities can be used to adress representative key questions to evaluate the project. Sorted by category: - Project planning - Project organization - Program management process - Project accomplishments - Project information
Project planning
Are the original objectives and goals realistic? Is the plan for the availability of project resources adequate? Are the original project schedule and budget realistic? Are there adequate project control systems? Was facility planning adequate? etc..
Project organization
How effective is the current organizational structure in meeting the project objective? Does the project manager have adequate authority? Is the organization o the project office staff suitable? Have the interfaces in the matrix organization been adequately defined? Do key project stakeholders understand the organization of the project office?
Program management process

Does the project manager adequately control project funds? Are the project team personnel innovative and creative by suggesting project management improvements? Does the project manager maintain adequate management of the project team? Do the project team people get together on a regular basis to see how things are going? etc..
Project accomplishments
To what extent have the original project goals been achieved? How valuable are the technical achievements? How useful are the organizational and/or management achievements? Are the results being implemented? Are the users being notified properly? Is the customer happy with the project results to date?
Project information
Key systems can provide key information on the status of the project which is necessery for the operations of the project team Such systems are: - An equipment, labor, and material IS - A cost control system - A schedule control system - A budget/financial planning/commitment approval system - A work authorization system - A method of using the collective judgment of team members to judge the progress being made
When to monitor and evaluate

Monitoring and evaluation of a project is done throughout its entire life cycle There are four major types of project evaluation: 1. Preproject evaluation 2. Ongoing project evaluation 3. Project completion evaluation 4. Postproject evaluation
Planning for monitoring and evaluation

Part of the project planning should include the development of a strategy on how the project will be evaluated during its life cycle. Evaluations should be done on a periodic basis This way it is visible for the stakeholders that the principal managers have a concern for the degree to which the project objectives and goals are achieved and an important message is sent throughout the organization
Who monitors and evaluates?

The responsibility rests withe project team and the project owner. Also the manager who has general management or project owner jurisdiction also shares in the residual responsibility. This process is done at many levels such as: - The individual professional's level - The work package level - The functional manager's level - The project team level
Project Audits
Project audits provide the opportunity to have an independent appraisal of where the project stands and the efficiency and effectiveness with which the project is being managed. Audits can be planned periodicly, but also requested when there is a sense that the project is in trouble, or when a new manager takes over in order to become accustomed with the project. Project audits should: - Determine what is going right or wrong, and why - Identify forces and factors that have prevented achievements of cost, schedule, and technical performance goals - Evaluate the efficacy of existing project management strategy - Provide for an exchange of ideas, information, problems, solutions, and strategies with the project team members
Responsibilities of the audit team

Critical review of the project documentation Interview of the project team and other project stakeholders to gain insight into their perceptions of the project affairs Participation in enough of the project activities to gain an appreciation of what is going on regarding the project and insight into the project problems and opportunities Preparation and submission of a final audit report and the defriefing of the project stakeholders on the results of the audit
Project audits implementation profile (PIP)

Developed by Pinto and Slevin to use in making periodic assessments of the current status of or key factors concerining a project Ten critical success factors can be measured - Project mission - Top management support - Project schedule/plan - Client consultation - Personnel - Technical tasks - Client acceptance - Monitoring and feedback - Communication - Troubleshooting
Postproject reviews
PPRs are used in order to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness with which projects are managed Such reviews have become commonplace to determine which project costs have been incurred reasonably in the nuclear plant industry At British Petroleum, these reviews have become an integral part of the corporate planning and control process
Conceptual phase
Project justification phase Pre-approval audit phase Approval phase Appropriation phase Construction and start-up phase Post-completion review phase Interim review
Strategic fit Broad perspectives
Financial analysis Specific market outlook

Validation of key assumptions
Approval by top management Authorization to spend money Implementation of the project
Full review
Mini review
Configuration management and control

Configuration control regulates changes that are made in a system, which if not properly done could reverberate throughout the rest of the components of the system, causing problems with budges, schedules etc.. Configuration management is the discipline which integrates the technical and administrative actions of identifying the functional and physical characteristics of a system (or product) during its life cycle Configuration management compirses three major areas of effort: Configuration identification, status accounting, and control
Configuration identification
Configuration identification is the process of establishing and describing an initial system baseline, which in turn is described in technical documentation The concept of a baseline system requires that the total system requirements and the requirements for each item of the system be defined and documented at designated points in the evolution of the system
Configuration status accounting

Configuration status accounting is the process of recording and documenting changes to an approved baseline to maintain a continuous record of the status of individual items that make up the system Also shows what actions are required and what engineering changes are complete
Configuration control
Configuration control is the process of maintaing the baseline identification and regulating all changes to that baseline. The configuration control board can provide a single-point authority for coordinating and approving engineering change proposals Such engineering changes have two potential costs. The first is the direct cost of the change itself while the second is related indirectly to the change order, or the ripple effect, e.g.,

Project Monitoring Evaluation and Control

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project Monitoring Evaluation and Control

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Read this document in other languages

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project Monitoring Evaluation and Control

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the steps in the control cycle?

What are the steps in the control cycle?

What are some key performance standards?

What are some key performance standards?

Project Monitoring, Evaluation, and Control

Steps in control cycle

(3) Comparing actual performance

Comparing planned and actual performance

Monitoring and evaluation

Success and failure examples

Management Function Evaluation

Program management process

When to monitor and evaluate

Planning for monitoring and evaluation

Who monitors and evaluates?

Responsibilities of the audit team

Project audits implementation profile (PIP)

Strategic fit Broad perspectives

Financial analysis Specific market outlook

Validation of key assumptions

Approval by top management Authorization to spend money Implementation of the project

Configuration management and control

Configuration status accounting

You might also like