Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporation
Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporation
Gainesboro Machine Tools Corporation
Zero dividend payout pros and cons 40% or $0.2 per share pros and cons Residual-dividend payout pros and cons
Conclusion
Founded in 1923
In early days, it has designed and manufactured a number of machinery parts, including metal presses, dies and molds. By 1975, it has evolved as innovative producer of industrial machinery and machine tools.
earnings
In 2003, dividends were decreased to a level below earnings Despite losses in 2004, small dividend was declared
Dividends is considered as a yardstick of a company's prospects Typically, mature, profitable companies pay dividends If a company with a history of consistently rising dividend payments suddenly cuts its payments, investors should treat this as a signal that trouble is looming Steady or increasing dividends is certainly reassuring, investors are wary of companies that rely on borrowings to finance those payments Holding onto profits might lead to excessive executive compensation, sloppy management, and unproductive use of assets
The firm pays out, as dividends, any cash that is surplus after
A particular pattern of dividend payments may suit one type of stock holder more than another A retiree may prefer to invest in a firm that provides a consistently high dividend yield, whereas a person with a high income from employment may prefer to avoid dividends due to their high marginal tax rate on income A key criticism of the idea of dividend clienteles is that investors do not need to rely upon the firm to provide the pattern of cash
Stock prices tend to increase when an increase in dividends is announced and tend to decrease when a decrease or omission is announced Managers have more information than investors about the firm, and such information may inform their dividend decisions, which is considered as an indication of firms health As managers tend to avoid sending a negative signal to the market about the future prospects of their firm, this also tends
Strength
Value Line rated it as an A Company
Recently restructured Artificial workforce They are expanding
Weakness
Top line and bottom-line are falling
Dividends are not being paid Very conservative
SWOT
Opportunity
World market New technology innovation JVs and acquisitions
Threat
Macroeconomic environment is not conducive New and big players are entering the market Market shock The competitors are catching up
What would be the most strategic, efficient and effective move that the management of Gainesboro should take in managing the firms equity that will not distort the stockholders and assures the companys future.
Pros
Its a growing company and needs the plough back the retained earnings Borrowing for dividend can be avoided Can be positioned as high growth and high technology firms More and more companies are not paying dividends Cash flow will be positive by 2007
Cons
Commitment! Value oriented investors(13%), Long-term retirement people(26%)
they need dividends
Pros
Inline with expectation 0.8$/share , the highest since 2001 Show positive sign of confidence Inline with growth Will stay within the 40% debt/equity ratio
Will increase by 10%( a total of ~ 20%)
Cons
Unnecessary increase in debt Growth company needs to plough back 15% growth is too optimistic Positive cash flow will be happen only in 2011, else in 2007 itself!
Even with a 15% growth
Excess cash
$ $ (25.7) (12.0)
Pros
Giving back only excess retained earnings
Cons
Dividend may not be constant
The companys image might be hampered
Pros
Will instill confidence
In turn increase the share price
Cons
As of now they have to take debt to buy back shares
Pros
Will increase the brand awareness Might increase share price Long term intangible asset
Cons
Is it required now ? Its not proven, its speculative High cost
With 40% the cash flow will become positive only in 2011 But with 30% it will happen in 2009 itself!
Its also safe(10% -20% growth should accompany a dividend of 30%-50%) Its in sync with the industry average
Thank You