Chapter 5
Chapter 5
Chapter 5
Product Specifications
Learning Objectives
How to translate subjective customer needs into precise target specs? How could the team resolve the inevitable trade-offs among product characteristics such as cost and weight?
Guidelines of Metrics
Metrics should be complete. Ideally each customer need would correspond to a single metric,and the value of that metric would correlate perfectly with satisfaction of that need. Metrics should include the popular criteria for comparisons in the marketplace. For example, popular science, customer reports or Bicycling and mountain Bike magazines.
Guidelines of Metrics
Metrics should be dependent, not independent, variables.
Variant of the what-not-how principle Specifications indicate what the product must do, but not how the specifications will be achieved. Designers use many types of variables in product development; some are dependent, such as the mass of the fork, and some are independent, such as the material used for the fork.
Guideline of Metrics
Metrics should be practical. Metrics will be directly observable or analyzable properties of the product that can be easily evaluated by the team.
Some needs cannot easily be translated into quantifiable metrics. Team notes that the metric is subjective and would be evaluated by a panel of customers. ( Subj. )
Step3: Set Ideal and Marginally Acceptable Target Values for Each Metric
Two types of target values are useful: an ideal value and a marginally acceptable value. The ideal value is the best result the team could hope for. The marginally acceptable value is the value of the metric that would just barely make the product commercially viable.
At least X
Establish targets for the lower bound on a metric, but higher is still better.
At most X
Establish targets for the upper bound on a metric, with smaller values being better.
Between X and Y
Establish both upper and lower bounds for the value of a metric.
Exactly X
Establish a target of a particular value of a metric, with any deviation degrading performance.
A Competitive Map