SYNTAX - Transformational Rule & Operations A
SYNTAX - Transformational Rule & Operations A
SYNTAX - Transformational Rule & Operations A
Pronunciation, intonation Vocabulary, Grammar, Function, Discourse, .. and in many more aspects
2
2-Level Framework
Language
Level 1 Level 2
Form
Meaning
Simple models of language study recognise at least the physical forms (sounds, letters, signs and words) contained in a language and the range of abstract meanings conveyed by these forms
4
3-Level Framework
Language
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Pronunciation (phonology)
Grammar (syntax)
Meaning (semantics)
Pronunciation - form of sound organisation to convey differences in meaning Grammar form of meaningful units that are brought into sequence to convey wider and more varied patterns of meaning Meaning the meaning conveyed by the above forms
6-Level Framework
Language
Structure
Medium of transmission
Level 1 Level 2
pragmatics
Use
Grammar
Level 5
Meaning (semantics)
Level 6
phonetics phonology
Level 3 Level 4
lexicon
syntax
discourse
morphology
The 6-level structure of language analysis proposed by Crystal are: Phonetics - The study of physical facts of pronunciation defined by the process of articulation, acoustic transmission and audition Phonology The study of how different languages organise sounds to convey different meanings
Syntax is the branch of grammar that studies how words are arranged to show relationships of meaning within and between sentences i.e the sentence structure (syntaxis is the Greek word for arrangement)
Syntactic Studies
Contribute in
Generating (un)grammatical sentences to explain grammar
3a. Disa fed the baby. 3b. Disa burped the baby. 3c. *Disa slept the baby. (intransitive verb)
Explaining creativity
"Some purple gnats are starting to tango on the microwave."
Explaining ambiguity
The lifeguard rescued the swimmer with no clothes on.
1a. Disa fed the baby. 1b. Disa burped the baby. 1c. *Disa slept the baby.
To show the difference between verb and phrasal verbs e.g run (verb) to to move very
2a. Jack and Jill ran up the hill. 2b. Jack and Jill ran up the bill. 2c. *Jack and Jill ran the hill up. 2d. Jack and Jill ran the bill up. 2e. Up the hill ran Jack and Jill. 2f. *Up the bill ran Jack and Jill. Note - prepositions do not go after noun quickly, by moving your legs more quickly than when you walk run up (phrasal verb) - to use so much of something, or borrow so much money, that you 10 owe a lot of money
Explaining Creativity
Grammarians go beyond analysing sentences by generating a set of rules that would generate tree structures in order to form new sentences e.g S NP + VP The history of VP V + NP generative syntax NP DET + N since 1957 is the study of the most V chased, ate efficient ways of writing rules Det the N girl, dog, hotdog, by substituting an abstract category with suitable words,
new sentences can be generated: - the girl chased the dog, the girl ate the hotdog - the dog ate the girl, the dog chased the hotdog etc What other sentences can you think of?
11
TASK 1
Try this individually: S VP NP V Det N ADJ NP + VP V + NP DET + (ADJ) + N (choose any 2 verbs) the (choose any 2 nouns) (choose any 2 adjectives)
Generative grammar are objective descriptions of the grammatical patterns that occur, unlike prescriptive grammar that tells us whether it is right or wrong
- Generate at least 4 sentences from your choice of words. - Compare your sentences with your partners. - How many different sentences have you got between you and your partner? 12
Explaining Creativity
By substituting chunks of the phrases with a more familiar words, we will be able to see the grammaticality of creative construction NP VP
"Some purple gnats / are starting to tango on the microwave. Some red ants / are starting to climb up the microwave. Some beautiful girls/ are starting to walk on the stage
OR make it more creative! Some brave mites/ are starting to win in the parliamentary debates Now you try it...........!
13
Explaining Ambiguity
The study of syntax is also useful in explaining meanings especially when the surface structure has more than one deep structure The notion of deep and surface structure was introduced by Chomsky in 1957 in his book Syntactic Structures. Chomsky argued that a sentence is formed based on an intended underlying meaning and some surface structure represent more than one deep structure and conversely, one deep structure can materialise into more than one surface structure 1st e.g : the Surface Structure Visiting relatives can be boring can have two D-Structure 1. It can be boring to visit relatives It should be noted that 2. Relatives who come visiting can be boring 2nd e.g : the Deep Structure Cats chase mice can have 2 S-Structure 1. Cats chase mice 2. Mice are chased by cats
this notion of D-Structure and S-Structure has altered greatly over the years but the basic insight has contributed greatly to the study of 14 linguistics
Explaining Ambiguity
The lifeguard rescued the swimmer with no clothes on S
NP VP AdjP with no clothes on
DET The
N lifeguard
NP
N swimmer
AdjP
with no clothes on
15 on It could be the either lifeguard or the swimmer who does not have any clothes
The first one is the natural, usual, unmarked word-order while the rest conveyed special effects of an emphatic or poetic kind
17
Describe the differences and similarities between the order of words in the phrases and the order of phrases in 18 sentences. Found any other examples?
What can you say about the nouns in the Japanese language?
20
Transformational Grammar
Transformational rules enable the grammarians to show the relationship between sentences that had the same meaning but were of different grammatical form The leading idea behind transformational grammar is that we can give a better account of the complexity of natural language syntax if we view it as the output of relatively simple basic phrase structures plus transformational operations. (Ideas introduced and developed by Noam Chomsky since 1955) This view is, of course, by no means uncontroversial among linguists, many of whom have preferred the alternative of enriching phrase structure rules so as to avoid the need for transformational operations.
22
Transformational Grammar
Chomsky developed Transformational Grammar to replace Left-to-Right Grammar Every sentence exists on two levels :
Surface Structure : the actual spoken sentence. Deep Structure : underlying meaning of the sentence.
A single deep structure idea can be expressed in many different Surface structures : Deep Structure : Boy kisses Girl Surface structure : The boy kissed the girl. The boy was kissing the girl. The girl was kissed by the boy. The deep structure gives the semantic component of a sentence, while the surface structure gives the proper phonological information to express that thought.
23
Transformational Grammar
Chomsky has proposed two sets of Rules : 1. Phrase Structure Grammar : these rules dictate the form of the deep structure.
Phrase structure rules specifies the necessary phrases for proper sentence construction, and the specific word ordering that should be followed within these sentence phrases. Phrase Structure Grammar forces a hierarchical arrangement among different parts of sentences. However, it cannot help distinguish among ambiguous sentences
2. Transformational Rules : these rules help transform the deep structure into the surface structure.
Transformational rules account for the shortcomings in Phrase Structure Grammar The manipulation of verb tenses is one aspect of transformational rules. Present tense, past tense, subjunctive, past perfect, future tense are all derived through transformational rules. 24
Transforming Questions
One of the extensive transformations in the English language is the formation of questions. There are two basic types of questions in English. One is used for asking questions where the answers are expected to be 'yes' or 'no'. These are Yes/No Questions. Tag questions can be described as Yes/No Questions but they are of different sentence patterns. The other is used in situations in which the questioner is looking for the identity of a person, place, time, object, reason etc. These are called the WH-Questions.
25
Yes/No Questions
Yes/No Questions require yes or no answers. The following examples are different ways in which people ask Yes/No Question:
A: Are you from around here? B: Yes (I am from around here) A: Do you come here often? B: Yes, (I do come here often) A: Can I buy you a drink? B: No (you can(not) buy me a drink) A: Will you marry me? B: No (I will (not) marry you) A: Has she called you? B: Yes (she has called me)
The words in blue are auxilliary verbs or helping verbs.
26
Yes/No Questions
Yes/No Questions are formed by moving the highest auxiliary, i.e. the auxiliary of the main clause. (i) Form a declarative sentence using the normal phrase structure rules. Build deep structures using phrase structure rules S -- NP + Aux + VP (You) (are) (from around here) or (You) (come here often)
(ii)
Identify the auxiliary verbs or add in auxiliary verbs for the main verbs. (You) (are) (from around here) (You) (do) (come here often)
(iii) Use transformational rules to turn deep structure into surface structure. The operation involved here is movement. Move the auxiliary verb of the main clause to the front of the sentence.
S Aux + NP + VP (Are) (you) (from around here) ? (Do) (you) (come here often) ?
27
Yes/No Questions
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. John is a doctor. Jane drives a sports car. Joan played basketball last night. Jan is eating her dinner. June has rented an apartment. Jen has been living there since 1969. One verb: is (be) One verb: drives One verb: played Two verbs: is eating Two verbs: has rented Three verbs: has been living
Task describe the operation of transforming sentences 1, 4, 5 and 6 into questions Sentence 2 - Jane drives a sports car. verb drives auxiliary do + es
Deep structure Jane (does) drive a sports car Surface structure Does Jane drive a sports car?
Task - describe the operation of transforming sentence 3 into a question
28
WH-Questions
Wh-Questions allow a speaker to find out more information about topics. They are as follows: When? -------- Time Where? -------- Place Who? -------- Person Why? -------- Reason How? -------- Manner What? -------- Object/Idea/Action
29
WH-Questions
- The grammar used with WH-Questions depends on whether the topic being asked about is the subject or predicate of a sentence. Transformation rule applies when topics asked about are the predicate of a sentence - For the subject pattern, simply replace the person or thing being asked about with the appropriate wh-word.
D-S: Someone kicked her S NP (someone) + VP (Something is bothering you) S NP (something) + VP S-S : Who kicked her? S -- NP (who) + VP What is bothering you? S -- NP (what) + VP
30
WH-Questions
Procedure for forming wh-questions in English: (i) Built deep structures using phrase-structure rules. Form a declarative sentence.
- Sheila is cooking (something) S -- NP + Aux + V + NP
(ii) Encode verb-argument relations, modifier relations. Include a WH-phrase, using the normal phrase structure rules.
- Sheila is cooking (what) S -- NP + Aux + V + NP
WH-Questions
1. Deep-Structure: "Gromit has done what?"
32
WH-Questions
2. Aux-movement: "has Gromit done what?"
33
WH-Questions
3. WH-movement: "What has Gromit done?"
34
1. The first Noun Phrase in the active sentence (NP1) is placed at the end of the passive sentence .
2. The second Noun Phrase in the active sentence (NP2) is placed at the beginning of the passive sentence 3. The verb (V) is changed from past tense to past participle (V-en), and an Auxiliary verb is inserted before it 4. A particle by is inserted between the verb and the final Noun Phrase This rule will generate all regular active-passive sentences
36
The end.
37