Supply Chain Strategies and Practices
Supply Chain Strategies and Practices
Supply Chain Strategies and Practices
Ph.D Candidate: Qi, Yinan Dept. Of Decision Sciences & Managerial Economics March 8th, 2005
Outlines
Introduction Research questions Conceptual model Literature review & hypotheses Methodology Expected Results Q&A
Introduction
Significant challenges in todays market
Individual businesses no longer compete as solely autonomous entities, but rather supply chains
(Lambert and Cooper 2000)
How to effectively manage the flow of materials from supply resources to the customer (Mabert and
Venkataramanan, 1998)
We need appropriate strategy to manage the operations of supply chain. Match Your Supply Chain with Your Market
Mason-Jones et al. (2000)
The performance of an organization depends on the appropriate fit between two or more factors
Input
Formulation (I) Implementation (IV)
Process
Output
Environmental Variables
Strategy
Organizational Variables
Performance
Formulation (III)
Business strategy
et al., 1996)
Environmental uncertainty
(Chow et al., 1995; Narasimhan and Kim, 2002; Yusuf and Adeleye, 2002)
Research Questions
What factors will have impact on decisions of supply chain strategies? How do those factors influence the supply chain strategies?
What kinds of supply chain management practices should firms choose to improve their competitiveness based on the selected strategy?
What are their impacts on firms performance?
Conceptual Model
Environments
Business Strategy
Practices
Performance
Product Char.
Literature Review
Porters (1980) generic strategies
Cost leadership
Focus on such factors that can help a firm reduce cost and maintain a low-cost position in the competition
Differentiation
We should view the strategic management from a new view of pursuing the commonalities among firms instead of an atomistic view. (Dess and Devis, 1984)
Fisher (1997)
Responsive supply chain Respond quickly to uncertainty, innovative products, supplier selection based on speed & flexibility Operational excellence Minimize cost, eliminate waste, standardized products. Collaborative communications with customers, high value-added products Commodities with high volume, focused on operation, high efficiency Compete simultaneously on price, novelty, quality and customer service Fashion-driven /technology-driven products, manufacturing flexibility
Morash (2001)
In conclusion, the basic supply chain strategies should include lean supply chain and agile supply chain, although they were described differently in previous literature.
Conceptualization
Lean supply chain
Forming a value stream from suppliers to final customers to eliminate all kinds of buffering cost in the system and to ensure a level schedule in production in order to maintain the competitive advantage through economic of scale in a stable and predictable marketplace.
Conceptualization
Agile supply chain
Developing a flexible and reconfigurable network with partners to share competences and market knowledge in order to survive and prosper in a fluctuating market environment by responding rapidly and cost-effectively to changes
Agile supply
Fashion goods
Marketplace demand
Product variety Product life cycle Customer drivers Profit margin Dominant cost Stockout penalties Purchasing policy Forecasting mechanism
Predictable
Low Long Cost Low Physical costs Buy materials Algorithmic
Volatile
High Short Availability High Marketability costs Assign capacity Obligatory Consultative
Literature review I
Business strategy & supply chain strategy
Very few literatures regarding such a topic Supply chain strategy should support firms competitive objectives
Hypothesis 1
Hypothesis 1a
The manufacturers are more likely to adopt lean supply chain strategy when they use overall cost leadership as their business strategy .
The manufacturers are more likely to adopt agile supply chain strategy when they use differentiation as their business strategy .
Hypothesis 1b
Literature review I
Environment and Strategy
Differentiation
Agile
Lean supply chain in stable environment (Katayama and Bennett, 1996; Mason-Jones et al., 2000; Cooney, 2002; Yusuf et al., 2003)
Hypothesis 2
Hypothesis 2a The manufacturers are more likely to adopt the differentiation strategies (i.e. innovative differentiation, product differentiation and marketing differentiation) as the environments are more fluctuate. Hypothesis 2b The manufacturers are more likely to adopt the overall cost leadership strategy as the environments are more stable and predictable.
Hypothesis 3
Hypothesis 3a The manufacturers are more likely to adopt the lean supply chain strategy as the environments are more stable and predictable. Hypothesis 3b The manufacturers are more likely to adopt the agile supply chain strategy as the environments are more fluctuate.
Literature review II
Product characteristics and strategy
Functional products need efficient supply chain and Innovative products need responsive supply chain (Fisher, 1997) system classify product into four clusters and different kinds of products need different manufacturing structure (Childhouse et al.,
3
DWV
Production-dominant need scale-efficient process and mediation-dominant need scaleinefficient process (Randall and Ulrich, 2001) Fashion goods need more agile supply chain
(Bruce et al., 2004)
Innovative product need agile supply chain and standard product need lean supply chain (Huang et
al., 2002)
Hypothesis 4
Hypothesis 4a The manufacturers are more likely to select lean supply chain strategy as the products are more functional. Hypothesis 4b The manufacturers are more likely to select agile supply chain strategy as the products are more fashionable.
Building manufacturing capabilities in order: quality, delivery, flexibility, and cost Building manufacturing capabilities in order: quality, dependability, delivery, cost, flexibility, innovation
Noble (1995)
Brown and Bessant (2003), Goldman et al. (1995) Christopher (2000), Kidd (1994), Robertson and Jones (1999)
Marketability Costs
JIT system
TQM Supplier integration Internal integration Customer integration Customer enrichment Organizational change AMT
OOO
OOO OOO OOO OO O O OO
OOO
OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO
Hypothesis 5
Hypothesis 5a The manufacturers that focus on lean supply chain strategy will have high degree of adoptions of lean practices, such as JIT, TQM, supplier integration and internal integration. Hypothesis 5b The manufacturers that focus on agile supply chain strategy will have almost equal degree of adoptions of the lean and agile practices including JIT, TQM, supplier integration, internal integration, customer integration, customer enrichment, organizational change and AMT.
Literature review IV
Practices and Performance
JIT purchasing has positive impact performance (Dong et al., 2001; Kelle and Miller, 1998)
on
JIT production system has positive impact on performance (Golhar and Stamm, 1991; Joo and Wilhelm, 1993) TQM has positive impact on performance (Flynn et
al., 1994; Ahire et al., 1996; Kaynak, 2003)
(Lee
Supply chain integration has positive impact on performance (Narasimhan and Das, 1999; Fronlich and
Westbrook, 2001)
Operational performance
Cost reduction, Inventory turnover, Labor productivity etc. Pre-sale services, Product support, Dependability etc. Volume, Mix, New product flexibility
Customer service
Flexibility performance
Hypothesis 6
Hypothesis 6
H6a: The manufacturers can increase their operational performance through the extensive use of the lean and agile practices. H6b: The manufacturers can increase their customer service level through the extensive use of the lean and agile practices. H6c: The manufacturers can increase their flexibility through the extensive use of the agile practices.
Methodology
Mail survey Factor Analysis SEM/Regression
Expected Results
The business strategies, environmental uncertainty and product characteristics are very important factors that have significant impact on the selection of supply chain strategy. The cumulative model is appropriate to describe the relationship between two supply chain strategies and the eight practices bundles. The congruence between environment, strategy and practices will lead to better performance.
Q&A