This document discusses procedures for calculating the Minimum Pressurization Temperature (MPT) for heavy wall vessels used in high temperature, high pressure hydrogen service. It outlines considerations for both fast fracture and slow stable crack growth. For fast fracture, it accounts for temper embrittlement effects and the impact of hydrogen. For slow crack growth, it examines hydrogen embrittlement threshold temperatures based on testing. The document also provides two examples of applying the methodology to calculate the MPT for typical hydroprocessing reactors. It identifies areas where additional work is needed to improve understanding and potentially make the approach less conservative.
This document discusses procedures for calculating the Minimum Pressurization Temperature (MPT) for heavy wall vessels used in high temperature, high pressure hydrogen service. It outlines considerations for both fast fracture and slow stable crack growth. For fast fracture, it accounts for temper embrittlement effects and the impact of hydrogen. For slow crack growth, it examines hydrogen embrittlement threshold temperatures based on testing. The document also provides two examples of applying the methodology to calculate the MPT for typical hydroprocessing reactors. It identifies areas where additional work is needed to improve understanding and potentially make the approach less conservative.
This document discusses procedures for calculating the Minimum Pressurization Temperature (MPT) for heavy wall vessels used in high temperature, high pressure hydrogen service. It outlines considerations for both fast fracture and slow stable crack growth. For fast fracture, it accounts for temper embrittlement effects and the impact of hydrogen. For slow crack growth, it examines hydrogen embrittlement threshold temperatures based on testing. The document also provides two examples of applying the methodology to calculate the MPT for typical hydroprocessing reactors. It identifies areas where additional work is needed to improve understanding and potentially make the approach less conservative.
This document discusses procedures for calculating the Minimum Pressurization Temperature (MPT) for heavy wall vessels used in high temperature, high pressure hydrogen service. It outlines considerations for both fast fracture and slow stable crack growth. For fast fracture, it accounts for temper embrittlement effects and the impact of hydrogen. For slow crack growth, it examines hydrogen embrittlement threshold temperatures based on testing. The document also provides two examples of applying the methodology to calculate the MPT for typical hydroprocessing reactors. It identifies areas where additional work is needed to improve understanding and potentially make the approach less conservative.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22
API 934F Task Group Procedure to Calculate the
Minimum Pressurization Temperature (MPT) for Heavy
Wall Vessels in High Temperature High Pressure Hydrogen Service - 2Cr-1Mo
Presentation at API 934F Task Group Meeting, September 18, 2012, New Orleans, LA Jim McLaughlin Consultant Basis for Calculating the MPT of Heavy Wall Vessels in High Temperature High Pressure Hydrogen Service Fast Fracture Considerations Low energy brittle fracture promoted by temper embrittlement effects Older reactor vessels (fabricated before circa 1980) without compositional controls to limit impurity levels, such as P, Sn, Sb and As Newer reactor vessels (fabricated after circa 1980) with compositional controls to limit impurity levels, such as P, Sn, Sb and As Effect of hydrogen on fast fracture new consideration Slow Stable Crack Growth Considerations Hydrogen embrittlement controls slow stable crack growth Recent research at UVa shows that hydrogen embrittlement effects rapidly disappear at a threshold temperature above which no embrittlement occurs Hydrogen embrittlement effects also function of impurity levels MPT determined by limiting temperature consideration due to fast fracture and slow stable crack growth considerations Fast Fracture Considerations - Temper Embrittlement Guidance Fast fracture addressed in same manner as in Part 3 of API579, paragraph 3.4.3.1, Pressure Vessels, Method A Need to establish starting temperature for entering Figure 3.7 to establish the Minimum Allowable Temperature (MAT) as a function of the applied stress ratio follows same temperature reduction curves as in Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2 of the ASME Code. Use an estimate of the 40 ft-lb transition temperature in the temper embrittled condition as the starting temperature Use 250F (121C) for older reactor vessels (fabricated before circa 1980) without compositional controls to limit impurity levels, such as P, Sn, Sb and As Use 300F (149C) for older reactor vessels without compositional controls and made from plate with long seam made with single ESW pass Use 150F (65C) for newer reactor vessels (fabricated after circa 1980) with compositional controls to limit impurity levels, such as P, Sn, Sb and As For reactor vessels with step cool requirements, use the maximum calculated or allowed temperature after the step cooling heat treatment with a 3.0 multiplier factor When is temper embrittlement a consideration? Suggesting that temper embrittlement be considered only when the maximum expected operating temperature (normally the end of run temperature) for the reactor vessel is 700F (371C) or higher Effect of Hydrogen on Fast Fracture New Consideration Effect of hydrogen on fast fracture at low temperatures ArcelorMittal data Effect of Hydrogen on Fast Fracture New Consideration Hydrogen has significant effect on fast fracture at low temperatures summary of ArcelorMittal data on 2Cr-1Mo with a very low FATT of -80C (-112F)
Effect of Hydrogen on Fast Fracture New Consideration Test conducted on 2Cr-1Mo with high impurity levels as prepared by Kobe Steel shows that the effect of hydrogen on fast fracture at higher temperatures decreases As the temperature approaches 150F (65C), the fracture toughness approaches 100 MPam even when soluble hydrogen levels are 3 ppm, highest expected level in refining hydroprocessing service. Conclusion: Effect of hydrogen on fast fracture insignificant above 150F (65C) Effect of Hydrogen on Fast Fracture New Consideration Combining results on the effects of hydrogen on fast fracture at low temperature per the ArcelorMittal testing, with the results of the Kobe tests at higher temperatures, the following curve can be used to define the shift in the fracture toughness transition temperature that results from the effect of hydrogen on fast fracture Slow Stable Crack Growth Considerations Hydrogen embrittlement controls slow stable crack growth considerations Hydrogen embrittlement effects as determined by a slow strain rate rising load test show that the effects disappear once the temperature reaches a threshold temperature above which hydrogen embrittlement effects are insignificant. Above threshold temperature reactor pressure limited to the full design pressure Below threshold temperature reactor pressure limited to 30% of the full design pressure Testing performed at UVa and data available from other sources are used to develop curves for the hydrogen embrittlement threshold temperature as a function of the bulk hydrogen level in the steel and the concentration of hydrogen that can accumulate in the plastic zone a head of a crack. Curves were developed for 2Cr-1Mo steel with high impurity levels and low impurity levels.
Hydrogen Embrittlement Threshold Temperature (High Impurity 2Cr-1Mo) Hydrogen Embrittlement Threshold Temperature (Low Impurity 2Cr-1Mo) Suggested Hydrogen Embrittlement Threshold Temperature Curves for Use in MPT Assessment Each curve represents a constant ratio of the bulk hydrogen concentration in the steel versus the concentration at a distance of 470m from the crack tip. For the purposes of an assessment 3 different levels of hydrogen concentration at the crack tip are defined. Each of these levels represent different stress intensity levels the higher the stress intensity the greater the hydrogen concentration at the crack tip Nominal hydrogen concentration (C 470m /C bulk = 1) This is the level that would be expected with a crack similar to the crack that existed in the compact tension sample used for testing for hydrogen embrittlement Conservative hydrogen concentration (C 470m /C bulk = 1.54) This is the level that would be expected with a crack that has a higher stress intensity than the crack in the compact test specimen. Non-conservative hydrogen concentration (C 470m /C bulk = 0.5) This is the level that would be expected with a crack that has a lower stress intensity than the crack in the compact test specimen.
Hydrogen Embrittlement Threshold Temperature (High Impurity 2Cr-1Mo) Hydrogen Embrittlement Threshold Temperature (Low Impurity 2Cr-1Mo) MPT Assessment of Typical Hydroprocessing Reactors MPT assessment for 2 typical reactor vessels
Fast fracture considerations Both reactors screened base materials and welding consumables with a step cooling procedure
For this assessment the starting temperature for fast fracture curve after temper embrittlement effects are accounted for is 75F
MPT Assessment of Typical Hydroprocessing Reactors Effect of hydrogen on fast fracture
First need to determine the bulk hydrogen level in the reactor wall The following assumptions are made for this calculation Calculation is made at the maximum expected operating temperature and hydrogen partial pressure using the latest diffusivity and solubility data from Kobe Steel Assume that the cladding is cracked so that there is no benefit from the stainless steel cladding in reducing hydrogen solubility in the steel No benefit calculated for outgassing during reactor shutdown MPT Assessment of Typical Hydroprocessing Reactors Effect of hydrogen on fast fracture
Reactor 1 Fast Fracture Starting Point Temperature 75F + 31F = 106F Reactor 2 Fast Fracture Starting Point Temperature 75F + 25F = 100F MPT Assessment of Typical Hydroprocessing Reactors Slow Stable Crack Growth Hydrogen Embrittlement Effects
MPT Assessment of Typical Hydroprocessing Reactors Slow Stable Crack Growth Considerations Control Over Entire Temperature Range for MPT Assessment
Reactor 1 Reactor 2 Low Impurity 2Cr-1Mo Does Not Meet MPT Guidance Meets MPT Guidance MPT Assessment of Typical Hydroprocessing Reactors (Old Reactors without Compositional Controls) MPT assessment for 2 typical reactor vessels
Fast fracture considerations Both reactors were fabricated prior to 1980 and did not have any compositional controls to maintain low impurity levels For this assessment the starting temperature for fast fracture curve after temper embrittlement effects are accounted for is 250F Since the starting temperature for the fast fracture curve is above 150F, there will be no additional temperature added to the starting temperature to account for the effect of hydrogen on fast fracture
High Impurity 2Cr-1Mo MPT Assessment of Typical Hydroprocessing Reactors Fast Fracture Controls at Higher Temperatures and Slow Stable Crack Growth Controls at Lower Temperatures
High Impurity 2Cr-1Mo Does Not Meet MPT Guidance Meets MPT Guidance Additional Work Needed on MPT Assessment Procedure Improved understanding of the 3 curves being suggested for the hydrogen embrittlement threshold temperature as a function of bulk hydrogen levels What are typical crack sizes/geometries indicated for each of these curves in a reactor vessel Ted Anderson will discuss further Assumptions included in the MPT procedure Are they too conservative? Assuming that a crack compromises the stainless steel cladding Using the dissolved hydrogen level at the maximum expected metal temperature and hydrogen partial pressure level without any reduction provided for out gassing during shutdown 3 curves being suggested for the hydrogen embrittlement threshold temperature Use of rising load test results to define hydrogen embrittlement effects Need to conduct testing on 2Cr-1Mo-V material Hydrogen embrittlement effort Effects of hydrogen on fast fracture