Quality Improvement Project
Quality Improvement Project
Quality Improvement Project
QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT
Annisa Putri Nur Bahri
1306370152
Dea Indriyani
1306370000
Fauzan Al Hafiz
1306393143
Leo Hubertus Dimas
1306406801
Raisa Khairunnisa
1306370101
Ritsah Quranis
1306370026
Wuri Listiani
1406642826
The Cars
DEFINE
ANALYZ
E
MEAS
URE
CONTRO
L
IMPRO
VE
DEF
INE
MUI has
many
visitors
Increasing
number of
people
who drive
cars
We need a
Located
near
Faculty of
Law
MUI
Parking
Area
filled
beyond
capacity
Located
near
Central
Library
People
park their
cars and
take the
train
DOES NOT
parking needs
SYMPTOMS
Carelessl
y parked
cars
Capacity
is not
properly
utilized
Many
cars take
wrong
turns
PROBLEM
STATEMENT
The confusing car flow and high
number of carelessly parked
cars, which lead to the
inconvenience at MUI Parking
Area
OUR
Reduce the
number of parking
GOAL
disorders incidence by 80% of the
total cars parking at MUI by June 1st ,
2015. The incidents are :
- Carelessly parked cars
meas
ure
S
Industrial
Engineerin
g UI
Students
I
People
who have
troubles
when
parking at
MUIs
parking
area
P
System
inside
MUIs
parking
area
Number of People
people
who
who have want to
troubles
park
when
their
parking at cars at
MUIs
MUIs
parking
parking
area
area
Quality
Drivers
Capacity
Spacious &
WellOrganized
Parking Area
Quality Drivers
Provides more
parking slots (+130 slots)
Using standardized
car slots of
230x500 per slot
80% of drivers are
not confused with
car flow
Reduce number of
car clash to less
than 10%
No careless
parking
HOW WE
QUESTIONNAIRE
OBSERVATION
MEASURE?
How many cars take
Parking
Mess
19.3
%
Careless
Parked
Cars
18.2
%
No Clear
Flow
3.7%
Damaged
68%
In your opinion, is
MUI parking area
well-organized?
15%
85%
OBSERVATION
RESULTS
ANALY
ZE
Pareto diagram
observat
ion
Questionn
aire
Fishbone diagram
Infrastructur
e
Bad physical condition
Not enough
capacity
A lot of waste
space
No parking slot
Car clash
No direction of cars flow
No lighting at night
No clear
regulation
No sign of direction
Unorganize
d MUIs
Parking
Area
Lack of human
resource
(security)
No security to control
parking area
Careless
drivers
No punishment for
people who park
wrongly
Regulation
Man
Lack of disciplinary
awareness
the
ROOT
CAUSE
Is
Calculate the
sigma level
Category
Calculation
Level
Sample
Number of defect
Probability of
defect
DPMO
Yield
738
361
48.92%
Sigma level
489159.9
51.08%
1.5
IMPR
Generate Creative
Solution Ideas
MAKE
A
DISPLAY
INFORMATION
ABOUT
PARKING AREAS CAPACITY
OF
THE
Tree Diagram
GOAL
STRATEGIES
TACTICS
Adding direction sign
inside the parking area
Adding necessary
changes toward the
infrastructures of the
parking area
ACTIONS
Measure the parking
area size to estimate
the number and size of
the parking slot
Prepare the materials
and work force
necessary to work on
the parking slot
Drivers must follow
signs inside the parking
area
Drivers are only allowed
to park in designated
spot
Make a rule about the
speed limit inside the
parking area
Impact-Effort Diagram
Implementation
(Step 1)
No enough parking
space
Befor
e
AFTE
R
Implementation
(Step 2)
There are 49 percent of all
drivers done wrong turns, and
14 percent cars clashes
WORKS
TO BE
Bureaucracy
Works
Physical
Improvement
Bureaucracy
Works
Approval of
Project
Permission
Letter for
Department
Permission
Letter
Submission
for General
Director
and Facility
Permission
Letter
Submission
for PLK
Workers
Hiring to
Execute the
Project
Use
safety
equipme
nts:
Gloves
PHYSICAL
IMPROVEMENT
Paint the
line (line
width: 14
cm)
Measure
the slot
line (230
cm x 500
Install
the noleft-turn
sign
STANDARD
OPERATIONAL
PROCEDURE
Drivers enter from the
entrance way of the
parking area, which is
right after the bus
shelter.
Drivers may
parallel park by
one line in front of
serried parked
cars if there are
Cars in parallel
parking outside the
provided slots
must not use
handbrakes and
CONT
ROL
3D Directional Map
After
Improveme
nt
(Observati
on 520,
Defect 36)
Alpha= 0.05
Test Ratio :
22.54
TRz > 1.645, reject H0
(accept H1), so
improving to add slot
line and display can
reduce defect
greather than or
Category
Sample
Number of defect
Probability of
defect
DPMO
Yield
Sigma level
Calculation Level
820
46
5.61%
56097.56
94.39%
3.1
Checksheet From
Observation
Thursday,
28 May
th
2015
No. Problem
Total
False Entry
False Turning
13
False Parking
4 False Exit
Total
7
36
Total Inspected
520
Percentage
:
6,92%
Questionnare Result
Question
Yes
No
96
98
96
CONTROL
CHART
UCL=105.8
I ndividual Value
100
50
_
X=36.1
Before
Improvement
0
LCL=-33.6
-50
1
5
6
Observation
10
UCL=85.68
60
40
__
MR=26.22
20
0
LCL=0
2
5
6
Observation
10
16
UCL=14.11
I ndividual Value
12
8
_
X=6.57
4
0
After
Improvement
LCL=-0.96
1
4
Observation
UCL=9.26
8
Moving Range
Moving Range
80
6
4
__
MR=2.83
2
0
LCL=0
1
4
Observation
AFTER IMPROVEMENT
56097,56 defects per
million
Observation Data: 36
defects out of 520
occurrences
Percentage Defect from
observation: 6.92 %
Questionnaire Result: 10 out
of 300 unsatisfied drivers
False Turning
: 13
Parking Slot Existence:
10
THANKYOU