Chapter 3 - Block Ciphers and The Data Encryption Standard

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 47

Chapter 3 Block Ciphers and the

Data Encryption Standard

Modern Block Ciphers


will now look at modern block ciphers
one of the most widely used types of
cryptographic algorithms
provide secrecy and/or authentication
services
in particular will introduce DES (Data
Encryption Standard)
We will look at AES (Advanced Encryption
Standard) adopted in 2001 later
1

Block vs Stream Ciphers


block ciphers process messages in into
blocks, each of which is then en/decrypted
like a substitution on very big characters
64-bits or more

stream ciphers process messages a bit or


byte at a time when en/decrypting
many current ciphers are block ciphers
1

Block Cipher Principles


most symmetric block ciphers are based on a
Feistel Cipher Structure
needed since must be able to decrypt ciphertext
to recover messages efficiently
block ciphers look like an extremely large
substitution
would need table of 264 entries for a 64-bit block
instead create from smaller building blocks
using idea of a product cipher
1

Claude Shannon and SubstitutionPermutation Ciphers


in 1949 Claude Shannon introduced idea of
substitution-permutation (S-P) networks
modern substitution-transposition product cipher

these form the basis of modern block ciphers


S-P networks are based on the two primitive
cryptographic operations we have seen before:
substitution (S-box)
permutation (P-box)

provide confusion and diffusion of message


1

Confusion and Diffusion


cipher needs to completely obscure
statistical properties of original message
a one-time pad does this
more practically Shannon suggested
combining elements to obtain:
diffusion dissipates statistical structure
of plaintext over bulk of ciphertext
confusion makes relationship between
ciphertext and key as complex as possible
1

Feistel Cipher Structure


Horst Feistel devised the feistel cipher
based on concept of invertible product cipher

partitions input block into two halves


process through multiple rounds which
perform a substitution on left data half
based on round function of right half & subkey
then have permutation swapping halves

implements Shannons substitutionpermutation network concept


1

Feistel Cipher Structure

Feistel Cipher Design Principles


block size
increasing size improves security, but slows cipher

key size
increasing size improves security, makes exhaustive key
searching harder, but may slow cipher

number of rounds
increasing number improves security, but slows cipher

subkey generation
greater complexity can make analysis harder, but slows cipher

round function
greater complexity can make analysis harder, but slows cipher

fast software en/decryption & ease of analysis


are more recent concerns for practical use and testing
1

Feistel Cipher Decryption

Data Encryption Standard (DES)


most widely used block cipher in world for
a long time; will change soon
adopted in 1977 by NBS (now NIST)
as FIPS PUB 46

encrypts 64-bit data using 56-bit key


has widespread use
has been considerable controversy over
its security
1

DES History
IBM developed Lucifer cipher
by team led by Feistel
used 64-bit data blocks with 128-bit key

then redeveloped as a commercial cipher


with input from NSA and others
in 1973 NBS issued request for proposals
for a national cipher standard
IBM submitted their revised Lucifer which
was eventually accepted as the DES
1

DES Design Controversy


although DES standard is public
was considerable controversy over design
in choice of 56-bit key (vs Lucifer 128-bit)
and because design criteria were classified

subsequent events and public analysis


show in fact design was appropriate
DES has become widely used, esp in
financial applications
1

DES Encryption

Initial Permutation IP

first step of the data computation


IP reorders the input data bits
even bits to LH half, odd bits to RH half
quite regular in structure (easy in h/w)
example:
IP(675a6967 5e5a6b5a) = (ffb2194d 004df6fb)

DES Round Structure


uses two 32-bit L & R halves
as for any Feistel cipher can describe as:
Li = Ri1
Ri = Li1 xor F(Ri1, Ki)

takes 32-bit R half and 48-bit subkey and:


expands R to 48-bits using perm E
adds to subkey
passes through 8 S-boxes to get 32-bit result
finally permutes this using 32-bit perm P
1

DES Round Structure

Substitution Boxes S
have eight S-boxes which map 6 to 4 bits
each S-box is actually 4 little 4 bit boxes
outer bits 1 & 6 (row bits) select one rows
inner bits 2-5 (col bits) are substituted
result is 8 lots of 4 bits, or 32 bits

row selection depends on both data & key


feature known as autoclaving (autokeying)

example:
S(18 09 12 3d 11 17 38 39) = 5fd25e03
1

DES Key Schedule


forms subkeys used in each round
consists of:
initial permutation of the key (PC1) which
selects 56-bits in two 28-bit halves
16 stages consisting of:
selecting 24-bits from each half
permuting them by PC2 for use in function f,
rotating each half separately either 1 or 2 places
depending on the key rotation schedule K
1

DES Decryption

decrypt must unwind steps of data computation


with Feistel design, do encryption steps again
using subkeys in reverse order (SK16 SK1)
note that IP undoes final FP step of encryption
1st round with SK16 undoes 16th encrypt round
.
16th round with SK1 undoes 1st encrypt round
then final FP undoes initial encryption IP
thus recovering original data value
1

Avalanche Effect
key desirable property of encryption alg
where a change of one input or key bit
results in changing approx half output bits
making attempts to home-in by guessing
keys impossible
DES exhibits strong avalanche

Strength of DES Key Size


56-bit keys have 256 = 7.2 x 1016 values
brute force search looks hard
recent advances have shown is possible
in 1997 on Internet in a few months
in 1998 on dedicated h/w (EFF) in a few days
in 1999 above combined in 22hrs!

still must be able to recognize plaintext


alternative to DES adopted in May 2001
1

Strength of DES Timing Attacks


attacks actual implementation of cipher
use knowledge of consequences of
implementation to derive knowledge of
some/all subkey bits
specifically use fact that calculations can
take varying times depending on the value
of the inputs to it
particularly problematic on smartcards
1

Strength of DES Analytic Attacks


now have several analytic attacks on DES
these utilise some deep structure of the cipher
by gathering information about encryptions
can eventually recover some/all of the sub-key bits
if necessary then exhaustively search for the rest

generally these are statistical attacks


include
differential cryptanalysis
linear cryptanalysis
related key attacks
1

Differential Cryptanalysis
one of the most significant recent (public)
advances in cryptanalysis
known by NSA in 70's cf DES design
Murphy, Biham & Shamir published 1990
powerful method to analyse block ciphers
used to analyse most current block
ciphers with varying degrees of success
DES reasonably resistant to it
1

Differential Cryptanalysis
a statistical attack against Feistel ciphers
uses cipher structure not previously used
design of S-P networks has output of
function f influenced by both input & key
hence cannot trace values back through
cipher without knowing values of the key
Differential Cryptanalysis compares two
related pairs of encryptions
1

Differential Cryptanalysis
Compares Pairs of Encryptions
with a known difference in the input
searching for a known difference in output
when same subkeys are used

Differential Cryptanalysis
have some input difference giving some
output difference with probability p
if find instances of some higher probability
input / output difference pairs occurring
can infer subkey that was used in round
then must iterate process over many
rounds (with decreasing probabilities)
1

Differential Cryptanalysis

Differential Cryptanalysis
perform attack by repeatedly encrypting plaintext pairs
with known input XOR until obtain desired output XOR
when found
if intermediate rounds match required XOR have a right pair
if not then have a wrong pair, relative ratio is S/N for attack

can then deduce keys values for the rounds


right pairs suggest same key bits
wrong pairs give random values

for large numbers of rounds, probability is so low that


more pairs are required than exist with 64-bit inputs
Biham and Shamir have shown how a 13-round iterated
characteristic can break the full 16-round DES
1

Linear Cryptanalysis
another recent development
also a statistical method
must be iterated over rounds, with
decreasing probabilities
developed by Matsui et al in early 90's
based on finding linear approximations
can attack DES with 247 known plaintexts,
still in practise infeasible
1

Linear Cryptanalysis
Find linear approximations with prob p !=

P[i1,i2,...,ia](+)C[j1,j2,...,jb] =
K[k1,k2,...,kc]
where ia,jb,kc are bit locations in P,C,K

gives linear equation for key bits


get one key bit using max likelihood alg
using a large number of trial encryptions
effectiveness given by: |p|
1

Block Cipher Design Principles


basic principles still like Feistel in 1970s
number of rounds
more is better, exhaustive search best attack

function f:
provides confusion, is nonlinear, avalanche

key schedule
complex subkey creation, key avalanche
1

Modes of Operation
block ciphers encrypt fixed size blocks
eg. DES encrypts 64-bit blocks, with 56-bit key
need way to use in practise, given usually have
arbitrary amount of information to encrypt
four were defined for DES in ANSI standard
ANSI X3.106-1983 Modes of Use
have block and stream modes

Electronic Codebook Book (ECB)


message is broken into independent
blocks which are encrypted
each block is a value which is substituted,
like a codebook, hence name
each block is encoded independently of
the other blocks
Ci = DESK1 (Pi)

uses: secure transmission of single values


1

Electronic Codebook Book (ECB)

Advantages and Limitations of ECB


repetitions in message may show in
ciphertext
if aligned with message block
particularly with data such graphics
or with messages that change very little,
which become a code-book analysis problem

weakness due to encrypted message


blocks being independent
main use is sending a few blocks of data
1

Cipher Block Chaining (CBC)


message is broken into blocks
but these are linked together in the
encryption operation
each previous cipher blocks is chained
with current plaintext block, hence name
use Initial Vector (IV) to start process
Ci = DESK1(Pi XOR Ci-1)
C-1 = IV

uses: bulk data encryption, authentication


1

Cipher Block Chaining (CBC)

Advantages and Limitations of CBC


each ciphertext block depends on all message blocks
thus a change in the message affects all ciphertext
blocks after the change as well as the original block
need Initial Value (IV) known to sender & receiver
however if IV is sent in the clear, an attacker can change bits of
the first block, and change IV to compensate
hence either IV must be a fixed value (as in EFTPOS) or it must
be sent encrypted in ECB mode before rest of message

at end of message, handle possible last short block


by padding either with known non-data value (eg nulls)
or pad last block with count of pad size
eg. [ b1 b2 b3 0 0 0 0 5] <- 3 data bytes, then 5 bytes pad+count
1

Cipher FeedBack (CFB)

message is treated as a stream of bits


added to the output of the block cipher
result is feed back for next stage (hence name)
standard allows any number of bit (1,8 or 64 or
whatever) to be feed back
denoted CFB-1, CFB-8, CFB-64 etc

is most efficient to use all 64 bits (CFB-64)


Ci = Pi XOR DESK1(Ci-1)
C-1 = IV

uses: stream data encryption, authentication


1

Cipher FeedBack (CFB)

Advantages and Limitations of CFB


appropriate when data arrives in bits/bytes
most common stream mode
limitation is need to stall while do block
encryption after every n-bits
note that the block cipher is used in
encryption mode at both ends
errors propogate for several blocks after
the error
1

Output FeedBack (OFB)

message is treated as a stream of bits


output of cipher is added to message
output is then feed back (hence name)
feedback is independent of message
can be computed in advance
Ci = Pi XOR Oi
Oi = DESK1(Oi-1)
O-1 = IV

uses: stream encryption over noisy channels


1

Output FeedBack (OFB)

Advantages and Limitations of OFB


used when error feedback a problem or where need to
encryptions before message is available
superficially similar to CFB
but feedback is from the output of cipher and is
independent of message
a variation of a Vernam cipher
hence must never reuse the same sequence (key+IV)

sender and receiver must remain in sync, and some


recovery method is needed to ensure this occurs
originally specified with m-bit feedback in the standards
subsequent research has shown that only OFB-64
should ever be used
1

Summary
have considered:
block cipher design principles
DES
details
strength

Differential & Linear Cryptanalysis


Modes of Operation
ECB, CBC, CFB, OFB
1

You might also like