Guillain Barre Syndrome
Guillain Barre Syndrome
Guillain Barre Syndrome
GBS epidemiology
GBS Pathogenesis
differential diagnosis
neurophysiological testing
GBS investigation
GBS clinical spectrum
GBS antecedent event
GBS and vaccine
GBS clinical subtype
GBS in children
Autoimmune
GBS treatment
GBS prognosis
GUILLAIN-BARRE SYNDROME
Dr. Eka Widyadharma, M.Sc, Sp.S
Guillain-barre syndrome
Clinical entity characterized by rapidly
progressing limb weakness and the loss
of tendon reflexes
Affects children and adults of all age,
sexes, men>women
Preceded by viral or bacterial ilness,
upper respiratory tract infections or
gastroenteritis in 60-70% cases
Kuwabara, 2004.
Guillain-barre syndrome
Is an autoimmune disorder
encompassing heterogenous group of
pathological and clinical entities.
Antecedent infections are thought to
trigger an immune response, which
subsequently cross-react with nerves
leading to demyelination or axonal
degeneration.
Seneviratne, 2000
GBS Epidemiology
Annual incidence 0,4-4,0 ( median 1,3 ) cases per
population of 100.000.
1,15 cases per population 100.000 in Japan
Kuwabara, 2004
GBS Epidemiology
Occurs in all ages
Slight peak in late adolescence and young adulthood
CMV and C jejuni infection
Elderly susceptible for autoimmune disorders
decrease immune suppressor mechanism
Men > women ( 1,25 : 1 )
Kuwabara, 2004
GBS Epidemiology
0,6-4 cases/100.000 population throughout
the world
Europe : 1,2-1,9/100.000
Fishers syndrome 0,1/100.000
Men > women (1,5:1)
Increase steadily with advancing age
China : 0,66/100.000 in all ages
Hughes & Comblath, 2005
GBS Epidemiology
the overall death rates range from 2-12% of
increase markedly with age.
In the United States, the case-fatality ratio ranges
from 0.7% less than 15 years to 8.6% more than 65
years.
In age 60 years or more, the risk of death increases
6-fold compared with persons aged 40-59 years and
increased 157-fold compared with persons aged less
than 15 years.
Males have a death rate 1.3 times greater than
females after the age of 40 years.
Cha-Kim, 2004
GBS Epidemiology
outcome of GBS more favorable in children than adults.
Deaths are rare and 75-90% achieve full recovery. The
recovery period is longer than the duration of the acute
illness, often weeks to months, with a median estimated
recovery time of 7 months. In another series, the median
time from onset of symptoms to initial recovery was 17
days; to walk unaided was 37 days; and to be symptom
free, 66 days.
GBS PATHOGENESIS
Ganglioside
The name ganglioside was first applied by the
German scientist Ernst Klenk in 1942 to lipids newly
isolated from ganglion cells of brain. They were shown
to be oligoglycosylceramides containing Nacetylneuraminic acid (sialic acid or 'NANA' or 'SA' or
Neu5Ac) residues (or less commonly N-glycoloylneuraminic acid, Neu5Gc), joined via glycosidic
linkages to one or more of the monosaccharide units,
i.e. via the hydroxyl group on position 2, or to another
sialic acid residue.
As a result, the polar head groups of the lipids carry a
net-negative charge at pH 7.0 and they are acidic.
These lipids can amount to 6% of the weight of lipids
from brain, but they are found at low levels in all animal
tissues where like the neutral oligoglycosphingolipids
they are concentrated in 'rafts' in the plasma
membrane. They are not found outwith the animal
kingdom. One of the common monosialo-gangliosides
(ganglioside GM1) is illustrated -
Gangliosides
Gangliosides in GBS
Mollecular mimicry
CIDP
Diagnosis
Neurophysiological testing
Neurophysiological testing
Sufficient data required from
at least three sensory nerves
at least three motor nerves with multisite stimulation
F waves
Bilateral tibial H-reflexes
Sign of demyelination finding probability increase as more
nerves were studied, including late responses, F waves,
and H-reflexes
There is still no consensus on neurophysiological criteria
for classification
Hughes & Cornblath, 2005
Neurophysiological testing
USA, Australia, and Europe: early electrodiagnostic study
abnormality showing demyelination in 85% cases
13% remains normal
Motor conduction studies were abnormal earliest, sensory
later
Early abnormalities : prolonged distal and F-wave
latencies, reduced conduction velocities, partial motor
conduction block
Feature of axonal degeneration developed over time
including reduced evoked amplitude and abnormal
electromyography
Neurophysiological testing
Sensory conduction:
Sural Action Potential is frequently normal
Median SAP is abnormal
normal sural-abnormal median pattern
No particular best time to do nerve conduction studies
Better be done as soon as possible
Repeated after 1 or 2 weeks
Parameters in ENMG
Distal latency
Nerve conduction velocity
(NCV)
CMAP amplitude
CMAP duration
F-waves
Sensory conduction studies
H-reflex
Needle EMG
Distal Latency
Abnormal ?
> 125 % ULN if CMAP amplitude is normal
> 150% ULN if CMAP amplitude is < 80%
Abnormal?
<80% of LLN if CMAP >80% of LLN
<70% of LLN if CMAP < 80% of LLN
CMAP Amplitude
CMAP Duration
Abnormal ?
>15% increase in the negative peak duration of the proximal
evoked CMAP compared to distal CMAP -called Temporal
Dispersion
Conduction Block
Difference of CMAP
amplitude between distal
and proximal stimulation
Value ? consensus
Conduction Block
F-waves
Abnormal F-wave
H-reflex
Dorsal Root
H Reflex
Abnormal ?
Absence of H-reflex
CV
Ho et al
Dutchgr
oup
Italy
group
<95
(85)
<90
(80)
80%
(70%)
<90
(85)
<70
<80
(70)
DL
>110
>115
>125%
>110
>150
>125
CB
30
30
20%
30
30
30
TD
30
30
20%
30
30
F-wav
>120
>125
>120%
>120
>150
120-150
43 pts
72%
37%
21%
58%
63%
56%
(Low amp)
Classification contd
Primary Axonal [AMAN/AMSAN]
None of the features of demyelination in any nerve
Distal CMAP amp <80% LLN in at least 2 nerves
Inexcitable
Distal CMAP absent in all nerves
OR present in only 1 nerve with amp.<10%LLN
Classification contd
Equivocal
Does not exactly fit criteria for any group
Prolonged DL 65%
Low CMAP amp 71%
Temporal dispersion 58%
Conduction Block 13%
Slowed Motor conduction velocity 52%
Definitive diagnosis in 55% usually by 5th day
AMNS Responses
Median: Wrist-finger
Sural: Calf-Lat mall
1.
2.
3.
4.
Demyelinative
conduction block
in proximal
segment
Acute axonopathy
in proximal
segment
Reversible
conduction failure
at nodes of Raniver
(AMAN)
Impaired
excitability
[Kuwabara JNNP
2000;68:191]
Inexcitable?
EMG
Prognostic Factors
Conclusion
Electro-clinical diagnosis
No universally accepted EP criteria
Majority 56-87% -AIDP
Early GBS - normal study unlikely with significant deficit
Axonal GBS diagnosed in the absence of demyelination
features
Low CMAP only prognostic indicator
Axonal
degeneration
Segmental
demyelination
b
Normal
Prolonged
Slow
Present
Present
Prolonged or absent
Prolonged or absent
Normal
Prolonged
Slow
Absent
Absent
Decreased
GBS Investigation
LCS
The
Evaluation
Pressure
Color
Blood
Cells
Culture &
Sensitivity
Protein
Glucose
Chloride
(not routinely
evaluated)
Normal Findings
Dissosiasi sitoalbuminique
GBS feature
Acute/sub acute onset
Gradual recovery after plateau phase
Mean time nadir; improvement; recovery : 12;
28; 200 days
Plateau phase 4 wks from onset
Seneviratne, 2000
Clinical Features
Most patients are essentially well
Lack systemic symptoms, including fever, when PNS
symptoms begin
Paresthesias
Weakness
Disease Progression
Pain
C jejuni
Major cause of bacterial GE throughout the
world
Most frequent antecedent infection of GBS
Commonest pathogen identified : 20%
diarrhoea
Eur & USA 26%-30% culttured (+)
Japan 45%
Kuwabara, 2004; Seneviratne, 2000
Seneviratne, 2000
C jejuni pathogenesis
Mollecular mimicry
Gangliosides: important surface molecule in nervous
system
Antibodies formed against ganglioside-like epitope in
lypopolysacharida C jejuni cross react with peripheral
nerves causing damage
High titre of antibodies against : GM1, GM1b, GD1a or
Ga1NAc-GD1a.
Host susceptibility : important
GBS & enteritis similar ganglioside like epitopes
Kuwabara, 2004; Seneviratne, 2000
C jejuni
Haemophilus Influenza
13% serological evidence in 41 cases in
Japan
Antiganglioside antibodies (+)
AMAN ~ C jejuni
Presence of ganglioside GM1-like structure
on the surface
Seneviratne, 2000
EBV
Mycoplasma pneumonia
Parainfluenza type 1 virus
Influenza A & B virus
Adenovirus
Varicella zoster virus (VZV)
Parvovirus B19
HIV
Lyme disease
Hepatitis A,B,C, and D
Typhoid
Plasmodium falciparum
Seneviratne, 2000
AIDP image
AMAN
Majority case in China 1991-1992
76% seropositive for C jejuni
Antiganglioside antibody anti GM1, GM1b, GD1a, GD1b,
Ga1NAc-GD1a
CAMP
Motor distal latencies, motor conduction velocities, SNAP,
F Wave Normal
Wallerian degeneration of motor axon
Earliest pathologic feature:
- lengthening of node of ranvier
- distortion of paranodal myelin
- dissection of axon from Schwann cell adaxonal
plasmalemma by extending macrophage processes
- may be reversible
AMAN image
AMAN
Tendon reflexes could be preserved or
exaggerate
Hyperreflexia in 1/3 cases esp early phase
occasionally acute phase anti GM1
antibody less severe case
Characterized by rapidly progressive
weakness often with respiratory failure
Usually good recovery
Seneviratne, 2000; Kuwabara, 2004; Hughes & Cornblath, 2005
AMSAN
EP inexcitable motor nerves and evidence of
sensory & motor axonal dysfunction
Axonal degeneration with no demyelination or
inflammation
Wallerian degeneration sensory and motor fibre with
little demyelination or lymphocytic infiltration
Could follow C jejuni infection
Numerous macrophage in periaxonal and intraaxonal
space epitope in such space
The course typically fulminant
Slow and incomplete recovery
The worst form of GBS
Seneviratne, 2000; Kuwabara, 2004; Hughes & Cornblath, 2005
Ataxia in MFS
Peripheral mechanism
Abnormal joint position sense
Abnormal muscle spindle proprioception
Fisher : out of proportion to the degree of sensory loss
Central mechanism
Based on MRI and EP test
Stain of the cerebellar molecular layer with IgG anti
GQ1b antibodies
Seneviratne, 2000; Kuwabara, 2004; Hughes & Cornblath, 2005
MFS Neuropathological
Scanty, rare disorder
Demyelination and inflammation of N III& VI
Demyelination and inflammation of spinal
ganglia
Demyelination and inflammation peripheral
nerve
No axonal damage
MFS Electrophysiology
or absent SNAP
Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity
N or
Absent tibial H reflex
Absent denervation changes In limb muscle
Pure sensory
Pure dysautonomia
Pharyngeal-brachial-cervical
Paraparetic variant
GBS in children
0,5-1,5 cases/million
Most common cause of acute paralysis
Affects all ethnic group
Incidence among countries variable
Unclear genetic susceptibility
potential pathogens infections
Associated with antecedent infection
EBV, CMV, Hepatitis, VZV, HSV
M. pneumonia, Campilobacter
Role of immunization anecdotal never concincingly
establihed
Sladky, 2004
Sladky, 2004
J Child Neurol; 116
Recovery
Weeks or months
Severity at nadir quite variable
Mean disability grade : 3.5-4
(Hughes criteria)
45% score 2-3
40% score 4
15% score 5
Mortality is rare with high
quality supportive
management
90-95% completely recovered
within 6-12 months
Minor Residual deficit
Pengertian:
MHC = seperangkat gene yang menghasilkan protein yang mempunyai
peran penting dalam imunologi
MHC molecule = molekul yang dihasilkan oleh MHC
Molekul MHC :
MHC I diekspresikan oleh semua sel somatik; fungsinya
mempresentasikan antigen kpd limfosit Ts
membunuh sel
MHC II diekspresikan hanya oleh fagosit dan beberapa sel lain; fungsinya
mempresentasikan antigen kpd limfosit Th
produksi antibodi
penting pada manipulasi kekebalan spesifik
MHC
Plasma Exchange
Requires skilled personnel and specialized
equipment
May not be available in all hospitals
May increase the risk of infection and
hemorrhage due to the removal of
immunoglobulins and clotting factors
Complications and side effects : hypotension,
septicemia, pneumonia, cardiac arrhythmias,
malaise, hypoprothrombinemia with
bleeding/abnormal clotting, and hypocalcemia
Mechanism of PE
Plasma exchange or plasmapharesis -The mechanism of plasmapheresis is
the removal of immunoglobulins and
antibodies from the serum by removing
the blood from the body, separating
cells from the plasma, and replacing the
cells in fresh frozen plasma, albumin, or
saline. Adult Dose3-5 exchanges of 50
mL/kg of plasma over 1-2 wk via central
venous catheter suggested
Corticosteroids
No benefit in GBS
124 patients treated with methyl prednisolone 500 mg for
5 days compared with 118 control (Lancet, 1993): no
significant difference
Cochrane evidence based review 2003 : corticosteroid
alone should not be used in the treatment of GBS
Introduction
Date of Most Recent Substantive Amendment: 2000 02 03
Background
The cause of Guillain Barr syndrome (GBS) is inflammation of the peripheral nerves which corticosteroids would be expected to benefit.
Objectives
To examine the efficacy of corticosteroids in hastening recovery and reducing the long term morbidity from Guillain Barr syndrome (GBS).
Search strategy
Search of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group register for randomised trials and enquiry from authors of trials and other experts in the field.
Selection criteria
Types of studies: quasi randomised or randomised controlled trials Types of participants: patients with GBS of all ages and all degrees of severity Types of interventions: any
form of corticosteroid or adrenocorticotrophic hormone Types of outcome measures: Primary: improvement in disability grade on a commonly used seven point scale four weeks
after randomisation Secondary: time from randomisation until recovery of unaided walking, time from randomisation until discontinuation of ventilation (for those ventilated),
mortality, proportion of patients dead or disabled (unable to walk without aid) after 12 months, improvement in disability grade after six months, improvement in disability grade
after 12 months, proportion of patients who relapse, and proportion of patients with adverse events related to corticosteroid treatment
Data collection and analysis
We identified six randomised trials. One author extracted the data and the other checked them. We obtained some missing data from investigators.
Main results
The six eligible trials included a total of 195 corticosteroid treated patients and 187 control subjects. One trial of intravenous methylprednisolone accounted for 243 of the total
382 subjects studied (63%). This trial did not show a significant difference in any disability related outcome between the corticosteroid and placebo groups.
There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid and control groups for the primary outcome measure, improvement in disability grade four weeks after
randomisation. The weighted mean difference of the three trials for which this outcome was available showed no significant difference. The actual figure was 0.06 (95% CI
0.32 to 0.19) grade in favour of the control group.
There was also no significant difference between the groups for most of the secondary outcome measures. However in the largest trial hypertension developed less often in the
intravenous methylprednisolone group (2/124, 1.6%) than in the control group (12/118, 10.2%), a significant difference in favour of corticosteroid treatment (relative risk 0.20,
95% CI 0.04 to 0.66).
Authors' conclusions
Corticosteroids should not be used in the treatment of Guillain Barr syndrome. If a patient with Guillain Barr syndrome needs corticosteroid treatment for some other
reason its use will probably not do harm. The effect of intravenous methylprednisolone combined with intravenous immunoglobulin in Guillain Barr syndrome is being tested
with a randomised trial.
Intravenous Immunoglobulin
IVIG is an immunomodulating agent that has multiple
activities. These include modulation of complement
activation; suppression of idiotypic antibodies; saturation
of Fc receptors on macrophages; and suppression of
various inflammatory mediators, including cytokines,
chemokines, and metalloproteinases (Dalakas, 2002).
The Fc region of IgG facilitates interaction with and
signaling through Fc receptors on phagocytes, B cells,
and other cells and with Fc-binding plasma proteins (eg,
components of the complement system) (Kazatchkine,
2001).
Pharmacology
Pharmacokinetics
Important features are as follows:
Bioavailability is 100% after intravenous injection
A five-fold rise of serum IgG following intravenous
injection with a decline to 50% in 3 days and
return to normal in 3 to 4 weeks
A two-fold rise of CSF level of IgG following
intravenous injection and return to normal
within a week
The half-life of intravenous immune globulin varies
from 2 to 4 weeks
Gamimune
Gamimune-N (Miles; Elkhart, Ind; Bayer)
Sterile solution in 5% and 10% concentrations
Sodium content in mEq/mL considered trace amount
(incompatible in saline)
Not sugar-glycine based
Advanced viral removal and inactivation technologies
used in manufacturing; solvent detergent treated
Contraindicated in patients with history of prior systemic
allergic reaction to IVIG products or a history of IgA
deficiency
pH of 4-4.5
Additives in 5% solution include 9-11% maltose; in 10%
solution, 0.16-0.24 M glycine
IgA content of 270 mcg/mL
Prognosis GBS
Evidence level
Guillain-Barre syndrome
1a
1b
1b
IV
III againts
current use
IV
1b
Lambert-Eaton syndrome
1b
1b againts
curren use
Condition
Evidence level
Dermatomyositis
1b
Polymyositis
IV
Stiff-man syndrome
III/IV
1b
Kawasaki disease
1a
No evidence
CNS vasculitis
III/IV
IV
Epilepsy
III/IV
Condition
Evidence level
III/IV
Rasmussen encephalitis
IV
Landau-Kleffner syndrome
IV
III/IV
Adrenoleukodystrophy
III against
current use
5S Immunoglobulin