Ch11 - Aggregate Demand II

macro
CHAPTER ELEVEN
Aggregate Demand II
macroeconomics
fifth edition
N. Gregory Mankiw
PowerPoint Slides
by Ron Cronovich
2002 Worth Publishers, all rights reserved
Context
Chapter 9 introduced the model of
aggregate demand and supply.
Chapter 10 developed the IS-LM model,
the basis of the aggregate demand
curve.
In Chapter 11, we will use the IS-LM
model to
see how policies and shocks affect
income and the interest rate in the
short run when prices are fixed
derive the aggregate demand curve
explore various explanations for the
CHAPTER 11 Aggregate Demand II
slide 2
Equilibrium in the IS-LM Model

The IS curve
represents equilibrium
in the goods market.
r
LM
Y = C (Y - T ) + I (r ) + G
The LM curve
represents money
market equilibrium.
r1
IS
M P = L(r ,Y )
Y1
The intersection determines

the unique combination of Y and r
that satisfies equilibrium in both
markets.
slide 3
Policy analysis with the IS-LM Model

Y = C (Y - T ) + I (r ) + G
r
LM
M P = L(r ,Y )
Policymakers can affect

macroeconomic
r1
variables with
fiscal policy: G and/or
T
monetary policy: M
IS
Y1
We can use the IS-LM

model to analyze the
effects of these policies.
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 4
An increase in government purchases

r
1. IS curve shifts
1
DG
1- MPC
causing output &
income to rise.
right
by
2. This raises money
LM
2.
r2
r1
demand, causing
the interest rate to
rise
3. which reduces
investment, so the final
1
increase in Y
is smaller than
DG
1- MPC
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
1.
IS2
IS1
Y1 Y2
3.
slide 5
A tax cut
Because consumers
save (1MPC) of the
tax cut, the initial
boost in spending is
smaller for T than
for an equal G
r
LM
r
2.
r21
and the IS curve

shifts by
- MPC
1.
DT
1- MPC
2. so the effects on r
and Y are smaller for a
T than for an equal
G.
1.
IS2
IS1
Y1 Y2
2.
slide 6
Monetary Policy: an increase in M

1. M > 0 shifts
the LM curve
down
(or to the right)
2. causing the
interest rate to
fall
LM2
r1
r2
3. which
increases
investment,
causing output &
income to rise.
CHAPTER 11
LM1
Aggregate Demand II
IS
Y1 Y2
slide 7
Interaction between
monetary & fiscal policy
Model:
monetary & fiscal policy variables
(M, G and T ) are exogenous
Real world:
Monetary policymakers may adjust M
in response to changes in fiscal
policy,
or vice versa.
Such interaction may alter the impact

of the original policy change.
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 8
The Feds response to G > 0

Suppose Congress increases G.
Possible Fed responses:
1. hold M constant
2. hold r constant
3. hold Y constant
In each case, the effects of the G

are different:
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 9
Response 1: hold M constant

If Congress raises G,
the IS curve shifts
right
If Fed holds M
constant, then LM
curve doesnt
shift.
r
LM
1
r2
r1
Results:
D Y = Y2 - Y1
IS2
IS1
Y1 Y2
D r = r2 - r1
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 10
Response 2: hold r constant

the IS curve shifts
right
To keep r
constant, Fed
increases M to
shift LM curve
Results:
right.
r
LM
1
r2
r1
D Y = Y3 - Y1
LM
IS2
IS1
Y1 Y2 Y3
Dr = 0
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 11
Response 3: hold Y constant

the IS curve shifts
right
To keep Y
constant, Fed
reduces M to shift
LM curve left.
Results:
LM
2
LM
r3
r2
r1
DY = 0
IS2
IS1
Y1 Y2
D r = r3 - r1
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 12
Estimates of fiscal policy multipliers

from the DRI macroeconometric model
Assumption
about monetary
policy
Fed holds
money supply
constant
Fed holds nominal
interest rate
constant
CHAPTER 11
Estimate Estimated
d value of value of
Y / T
Y / G
0.60
0.26
1.93
1.19
Aggregate Demand II
slide 13
Shocks in the IS-LM Model

IS shocks: exogenous changes in the
demand for goods & services.
Examples:
stock market boom or crash
change in households wealth
C
change in business or consumer
confidence or expectations
I and/or C
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 14
Shocks in the IS-LM Model

LM shocks: exogenous changes in the
demand for money.
Examples:
a wave of credit card fraud increases
demand for money
more ATMs or the Internet reduce
money demand
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 15
CASE STUDY
The U.S. economic slowdown of 2001

~What happened~
1. Real GDP growth rate
1994-2000: 3.9% (average
annual)
2001: 1.2%
2. Unemployment rate
Dec 2000:
4.0%
Dec 2001:
5.8%
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 16
CASE STUDY

~Shocks that contributed to the
slowdown~
1. Falling stock prices
From Aug 2000 to Aug 2001:

25%
Week after 9/11: -12%
2. The terrorist attacks on 9/11
increased uncertainty
fall in consumer & business
confidence
Both shocks
reduced
Aggregate
Demand IIspending and
CHAPTER 11
slide 17
CASE STUDY

~The policy response~
1. Fiscal policy
large long-term tax cut,
immediate $300 rebate checks
spending increases:
aid to New York City & the airline
industry,
war on terrorism
2. Monetary policy
Fed lowered its Fed Funds rate target
11 times during 2001, from 6.5% to
1.75%
Money
CHAPTER
11 Aggregate
II
growth Demand
increased,
interest rates
slide 18
CASE STUDY

~Whats happening now~
In the first quarter of 2002, Real GDP

grew at an annual rate of 6.1%,
according to final figures released by
the Bureau of Economic Analysis on
June 27, 2002.
However, in its news release of June 7,

2002, the NBER Business Cycle Dating
Committee had not yet determined the
date of the trough in economic activity,
though it acknowledges that the
economy
seemsDemand
to be IIpicking up.
CHAPTER
11 Aggregate
slide 19
What is the Feds policy instrument?

What the newspaper says:
the Fed lowered interest rates by one-half point
today
What actually happened:

The Fed conducted expansionary monetary
policy to shift the LM curve to the right until the
interest rate fell 0.5 points.
The
TheFed
Fedtargets
targetsthe
theFederal
FederalFunds
Fundsrate:
rate:
ititannounces
announcesaatarget
targetvalue,
value,
and
anduses
usesmonetary
monetarypolicy
policyto
toshift
shiftthe
theLM
LM
curve
curve
as
asneeded
neededto
toattain
attainits
itstarget
targetrate.
rate.
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 20
What is the Feds policy instrument?

Why does the Fed target interest rates
instead of the money supply?
1) They are easier to measure than the
money supply
2) The Fed might believe that LM
shocks are more prevalent than IS
shocks. If so, then targeting the
interest rate stabilizes income better
than targeting the money supply.
(See Problem 7 on p.306)
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 21
IS-LM and Aggregate Demand

So far, weve been using the IS-LM
model to analyze the short run, when
the price level is assumed fixed.
However, a change in P would shift

the LM curve and therefore affect Y.
The aggregate demand curve

(introduced in chap. 9 ) captures this
relationship between P and Y
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 22
Deriving the AD curve

Intuition for slope
of AD curve:
P
(M/P )
r1
IS
P
P2
P1
Y2
Y1
AD
Y
CHAPTER 11
LM(P1)
r2
LM shifts
left
LM(P2)
Y2
Aggregate Demand II
Y1
Y
slide 23
Monetary policy and the AD curve

LM(M1/P1)
The Fed can increase

aggregate demand:
r1
M LM shifts right
r2
LM(M2/P1)
IS
r
I
Y at each
value of P
P1
Y1
Y1
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
Y2
Y2
AD2
AD1
Y
slide 24
Fiscal policy and the AD curve

Expansionary fiscal
policy (G and/or T )
increases agg.
demand:
T C
IS shifts right
Y at each
value of P
LM
r2
r1
IS2
IS1
Y1
P1
Y1
CHAPTER 11
Y2
Aggregate Demand II
Y2
AD2
AD1
Y
slide 25
IS-LM and AD-AS

in the short run & long run
Recall from Chapter 9:
The force that

moves the economy from the short run to
the long run
is the gradual adjustment of prices.
In the short-run
then over time,
equilibrium, if
the price level
will
rise
Y >Y
Y <Y
fall
Y =Y
remain constant
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 26
The SR and LR effects of an IS shock

r
A negative IS
shock shifts IS and
AD left, causing Y
to fall.
LRAS LM(P )
1
IS2
Y
P
SRAS1
Y
Aggregate Demand II
LRAS
P1
CHAPTER 11
IS1
AD1
AD2
Y
slide 27

r
LRAS LM(P )
1
In the new shortrun equilibrium,

Y <Y
IS2
Y
P
SRAS1
Y
Aggregate Demand II
LRAS
P1
CHAPTER 11
IS1
AD1
AD2
Y
slide 28

r
LRAS LM(P )
1
In the new shortrun equilibrium,

Y <Y
IS2
Over time,
P gradually falls,
which causes
SRAS to move
down
M/P to increase,
which causes LM
to move down
CHAPTER 11
Y
P
LRAS
SRAS1
P1
Aggregate Demand II
IS1
AD1
AD2
Y
slide 29

r
LRAS LM(P )
1
LM(P2)
IS2
Over time,
P gradually falls,
which causes
SRAS to move
down
M/P to increase,
which causes LM
to move down
CHAPTER 11
Y
P
IS1
Y
LRAS
P1
SRAS1
P2
SRAS2
Aggregate Demand II
AD1
AD2
Y
slide 30

r
This process
continues until
economy reaches a
long-runYequilibrium
=Y
with
LRAS LM(P )
1
LM(P2)
IS2
Y
P
LRAS
P1
SRAS1
P2
SRAS2
Y
CHAPTER 11
IS1
Aggregate Demand II
AD1
AD2
Y
slide 31
The Great Depression

240
Unemployment
(right scale)
220
30
25
billions of 1958 dollars

200
20
180
15
160
10
Real GNP
(left scale)
140
120
1929
1931
CHAPTER 11
1933
1935
1937
Aggregate Demand II
1939
percent of labor force
5
0
slide 32
The Spending Hypothesis:
Shocks to the IS Curve
asserts that the Depression was

largely due to an exogenous fall in the
demand for goods & services -- a
leftward shift of the IS curve
evidence:
output and interest rates both fell,
which is what a leftward IS shift would
cause
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 33
The Spending Hypothesis:
Reasons for the IS shift
1. Stock market crash exogenous C
Oct-Dec 1929: S&P 500 fell 17%

Oct 1929-Dec 1933: S&P 500 fell 71%
2. Drop in investment
correction after overbuilding in the

1920s
widespread bank failures made it harder
to obtain financing for investment
3. Contractionary fiscal policy
in the face of falling tax revenues and

increasing deficits, politicians raised tax
rates and cut spending
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 34
The Money Hypothesis:
A Shock to the LM Curve
asserts that the Depression was

largely due to huge fall in the money
supply
evidence:
M1 fell 25% during 1929-33.
But, two problems with this hypothesis:
1. P fell even more, so M/P actually
rose slightly during 1929-31.

2. nominal interest rates fell, which is the
opposite of what would result from a
leftward LM shift.
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 35
The Money Hypothesis Again:
The Effects of Falling Prices
asserts that the severity of the

Depression was due to a huge
deflation:
P fell 25% during 1929-33.
This deflation was probably caused

by
the fall in M, so perhaps money
played
an important role after all.
In what ways does a deflation affect

CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
the economy?
slide 36
The stabilizing effects of deflation:
P (M/P ) LM shifts right Y

Pigou effect:
P (M/P )
consumers wealth
C
IS shifts right
Y
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 37
The destabilizing effects of unexpected

deflation:
debt-deflation theory
P (if unexpected)
transfers purchasing power from
borrowers to lenders
borrowers spend less,
lenders spend more
if borrowers propensity to spend is
larger than lenders, then aggregate
spending falls, the IS curve shifts left,
and
falls Demand II
CHAPTER
11 Y
Aggregate
slide 38
The destabilizing effects of expected

deflation:
e
r for each value of i
I because I = I (r )
planned expenditure & agg.
demand
income & output
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 39
Why another Depression is unlikely

Policymakers (or their advisors) now know
much more about macroeconomics:
The Fed knows better than to let M fall
so much, especially during a
contraction.
Fiscal policymakers know better than to
raise taxes or cut spending during a
contraction.
Federal deposit insurance makes

widespread bank failures very unlikely.
CHAPTER
Automatic
stabilizers
11 Aggregate
Demand IImake fiscal policy
slide 40
Chapter summary
1. IS-LM model
a theory of aggregate demand

exogenous: M, G, T,
P exogenous in short run, Y in long

run
endogenous: r,
Y endogenous in short run, P in long

run
IS curve: goods market equilibrium
LM curve: money market equilibrium
CHAPTER 11
Aggregate Demand II
slide 41
Chapter summary
2. AD curve
shows relation between P and the IS-LM

models equilibrium Y.
negative slope because
P (M/P ) r I Y
expansionary fiscal policy shifts IS curve
right, raises income, and shifts AD curve
right
expansionary monetary policy shifts LM
curve right, raises income, and shifts AD
curve right
IS or
shocksDemand
shift the
AD curve
CHAPTER
11 LM
Aggregate
II
slide 42

Ch11 - Aggregate Demand II

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ch11 - Aggregate Demand II

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ch11 - Aggregate Demand II

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

macro

Equilibrium in the IS-LM Model

The intersection determines

Policy analysis with the IS-LM Model

Policymakers can affect

We can use the IS-LM

An increase in government purchases

2. This raises money

and the IS curve

Monetary Policy: an increase in M

Such interaction may alter the impact

The Feds response to G > 0

In each case, the effects of the G

Response 1: hold M constant

Response 2: hold r constant

Response 3: hold Y constant

Estimates of fiscal policy multipliers

Shocks in the IS-LM Model

Shocks in the IS-LM Model

The U.S. economic slowdown of 2001

The U.S. economic slowdown of 2001

From Aug 2000 to Aug 2001:

2. The terrorist attacks on 9/11

The U.S. economic slowdown of 2001

The U.S. economic slowdown of 2001

In the first quarter of 2002, Real GDP

However, in its news release of June 7,

What is the Feds policy instrument?

What actually happened:

What is the Feds policy instrument?

IS-LM and Aggregate Demand

However, a change in P would shift

The aggregate demand curve

relationship between P and Y

Deriving the AD curve

Monetary policy and the AD curve

The Fed can increase

Fiscal policy and the AD curve

IS-LM and AD-AS

The force that

The SR and LR effects of an IS shock

The SR and LR effects of an IS shock

In the new shortrun equilibrium,

The SR and LR effects of an IS shock

In the new shortrun equilibrium,

The SR and LR effects of an IS shock

The SR and LR effects of an IS shock

The Great Depression

billions of 1958 dollars

percent of labor force

The Spending Hypothesis:

Shocks to the IS Curve

asserts that the Depression was

The Spending Hypothesis:

Reasons for the IS shift

1. Stock market crash exogenous C

Oct-Dec 1929: S&P 500 fell 17%

correction after overbuilding in the

in the face of falling tax revenues and