M&M (SA) Strategy
M&M (SA) Strategy
M&M (SA) Strategy
SOUTH AFRICA
An Analysis by:
Ajay Shetty PGPM- 16 - 004
Bharat Gakhar PGPM 016 - 013
Kavita Singh - PGPM 16 - 027
Shreya Bhattacharya PGPM 16 - 053
Viraj Nayak PGPM 16 - 067
Question 1:Which of the 4 options should
Chief Executive International operations
choose for M&M in South Africa?
Options available for M&M in South Africa are contract assembly, setting up of a new
manufacturing facility, wait and watch and sustain and grow using current business model
of importing CBUs and selling to other African countries.
M&Ms sale in the SUV segment is the lowest amongst competing brands in the product
line (1555 vehicles in 2010).
Also M&M has sold an aggregate of 11000 vehicles in the period 2005 to 2010.
Also , the new reduced import tariffs under APDP will give some allowance to
manufacturers who import a percentage of their components, the manufacturers must
have a plant volume of at least 50000 units to claim this benefit.
M&M competes with players such as Toyota, BMW, Land Rover in the SUV market which
have higher sales as well as better brand equity than M&M in South Africa.
High entry barriers in import and sale of CBU will not help Mahindra achieve its strategic
targets.
Investing in a new manufacturing facility will involve significant investment and with the
volume of M&M in South Africa, will pose a challenge as far as break even point is
concerned.
With contract assembly, M&M can have the benefit of improving margins be reducing lead
times thereby reducing shipping costs of CBUs which are otherwise supplied from India.
The company must partner with an assembler who has surplus capacity, ability to ramp up
, technical know how and financial capability.
Wait and watch approach may help the company overcome recessionary pressures but
the company will have to continue bearing the burden of high import duty.
Therefore, contract assembly will be the most feasible option for Mahindra and Mahindra in
South Africa.
Question 2-
M&M experience with South African
Subsidiary
The decisions made by the subsidiary organization M&M (SA) were in-line
with the growth strategy of the organization.
Their entry level strategy of :
Entering and capturing a niche segment with Bolero and Scorpio
Competitive pricing
Helped them gain market share in semi urban and rural areas.
Though this option conflicts with M&Ms business style with the vendor controlling
mobilization and deployment of resources as well as certification of vehicles, but it
appears to be the best bet given the market conditions
M&M could consider the possibility of establishing a manufacturing facility once the
macroeconomic conditions stabilized and it managed to acquire a bigger market
share.