Cost Energy and Material Analysis of Biodiesel Production Using Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalyst
Cost Energy and Material Analysis of Biodiesel Production Using Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalyst
Cost Energy and Material Analysis of Biodiesel Production Using Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalyst
Analysis of Biodiesel
Production Using
Homogeneous and
Heterogeneous Catalyst
Prepared by:
Nik Nor Azrizam Bin Nik Norizam 11609 (ID Number)
Muhamad Hazim Bin Azemi 11605 (ID Number)
Introduction
Biodiesel definition
üProduct of the reaction of an alcohol (methanol or
ethanol) with a animal fat or vegetable oil to
form glycerol, mono-alkyl esters of fatty acids
and excess methanol.
üCatalyst is used during the formation of biodiesel.
Purpose of biodiesel production
üPromising alternative to conventional petroleum
based diesel fuel.
üAnswer to overcome global warming by reducing
carbon dioxide and nitrogen dioxide gas emission.
Advantages of biodiesel
üDerived from a renewable domestic resource
(vegetable oil).
üReduces carbon dioxide emissions by 78% compared
to diesel fuel.
üNon-toxic and biodegradable.
üEnvironmental fuel.
Methods to Produce Biodiesel
a) Using supercritical methanol.
b) Using fast and slow pyrolysis.
c) Using catalyst.
Reason using catalyst method in biodiesel production
ü Convenient to use catalyst in small scale
operation.
ü Easy to conduct experiment in laboratories.
ü More cheaper compare to other methods.
ü No need additional equipment.
v
Overview
To compare biodiesel production using homogeneous and
heterogeneous catalysts.
To study on how homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts
will affect on material, energy and cost for the
process.
To compare effectiveness of homogeneous and
heterogeneous catalysts towards biodiesel production.
All simulation and modeling are done using MATLAB
software and it based on small scale batch mode
process.
3 factors are being studied which are materials, energy
and cost.
üThey contribute the most in determining which
catalyst is the best.
üTo see effect of all three factors towards
environment and business.
üAll the factor can be related to each other.
Process Diagram for Both
Homogeneous and
Heterogeneous Catalysts
( Base Line )
Figure 1 : Homogeneous Catalyst Process Diagram
Figure 2 : Heterogeneous Catalyst Process Diagram
Equipment Modeling
Heat to raise temperature (Q raise)
This heat is required to increase temperature of the system
to operating temperature and is define as
Q raise =m i C p i (T f −T i)
Heat Released by conduction or by convection (Q out
conduction / Q out convection)
This heat occurs when there is temperature different
between equipment and surrounding.
Q out convection = [ h air Aequipment (T equipment −T air )] ×total time
(T equipment −T air )
Q out conduction = [k equipment A equipment ] × total time
( x1 − x 2 )
Q ma int ain =Q out convection / conduction +Q rxn
Q drop =m i C p i (T f −T i)
HEATING TANK (PREHEATING PROCESS)
In p u t O u tp u t
F e e d in
Q
Temp
in itia l
Temp Feed
fin al out
M o d e l d ia g ra m
Pro ce ss d ia g ra m
Calculation of Heat Required in Preheating
Process
Symbol Definition
Q Heat required (J)
m veg oil Mass vegetable oil enter (kg)
Cp veg oil Specific Heat Capacity
Tf (1670 J/kg K)
Final temperature system
Ti (333K)
Initial temperature system
(298 K)
OVEN ( CALCIUM CARBONATE DECOMPOSE
PROCESS)
CaCO3
Qrxn
Heat to Heat to
maintain raise
temperature temperature
Pro ce ss d ia g ra m
M o d e ld ia g ra m
Chemical Equation in Decompose
Process
Calculation of Total Heat Required
Q required total =Q raise +Q out conduction +Q reaction
(T oven−T air )
Q required total = [n CaCO 3 C PCaCO3 ](T f −T i) + [(k oven A oven ) × total time × 6]
( x1 − x 2 )
+ (∆H of @ 25°C + ∆H @T out )
where
( ) (
∆H @T out = [ n CaO Cp CaO +n CO 2 Cp CO 2 − n CaCO 3 Cp CaCO 3 ] ×(T out −T @ 25 °C) )
Symbol Definition
k oven Thermal conductivity of cotton (0.03 W/m K)
A oven Surface area of oven (m2)
T oven Temperature inside oven (1073 K)
T air Ambient temperature (308 K)
Total time Time required for process (10800 s)
(x1 – x2) Oven thickness (0.22m)
ΔH ̊f @ 25 Enthalpy formation at 25 C̊
Tf Final temperature (1073 K)
Ti Initial temperature (308 K)
Calculation of Total Heat Wasted
Q wasted total = (Q out conduction × total time ) +Q drop
(T oven−T air)
Q wasted total = [k ovenA oven × total time× 6] + n CaOC p CaO (T f −T i)
( x1 − x 2 )
Symbol Definition
k oven Thermal conductivity of cotton (0.03 W/m K)
A oven Surface area of oven (m2)
T oven Temperature inside oven (1073K)
T air Ambient temperature (308K)
Total time Time required for process (10800 s)
(x1 – x2) Oven thickness (0.22 m)
Tf Final temperature (1073 K)
Ti Initial temperature (308 K)
MIXER TANK (MIXING PROCESS)
Pro ce ss d ia g ra m
M o d e ld ia g ra m
Chemical Equation in Mixing Process
Symbol Definition
Q wasted total Heat released by system (J)
h air Heat transfer coefficient
(50 W/m2 K)
A mixer Area of mixer (m2)
T mixer Temperature mixer (333 K)
T air Temperature air (308 K)
Total Time Total Time for mixing
process (1800 s)
Calculation of Total Heat Required for
Homogeneous Catalyst
Symbols Definition
Cp CH3OH Specific heat capacity of methanol (86.2 J/mol K)
Cp KOH Specific heat capacity of potassium hydroxide
( 49.4626 J/mol K)
Tf Temperature final of system (333 K)
Ti Temperature initial of system (308 K)
ΔH ̊f @25 ̊C Standard enthalpy formation of product at 25 ̊ C
(J/mol)
h air Heat transfer coefficient of air (50W/m2 K)
A mixer Area of mixer (m2)
T mixer Temperature mixer (333 K)
T air Temperature air (308 K)
Time Total Time for mixing process (1800 s)
Calculation of Total Heat Required for
Heterogeneous Catalyst
Model diagram
Chemical Equation for Transesterification Process
Q wasted total = [[h air Areactor (T reactor−T air)] × total time]
Symbol Definition
Q wasted total Heat released by system (J)
h air Heat transfer coefficient
A reactor (50
AreaW/m2 K) (m2)
of mixer
T reactor Temperature reactor (333
T air K)
Temperature air (308 K)
Total Time Total Time for mixing
process (3600 s)
Calculation of Total Heat Required for
Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalyst
Q required total =Q ma int ain
Q required total =Q out convection −Q reaction
Q required total = [ h A
air reactor(T −
reactor T air) × total time] − [ ∆ H f @ 25° C + ∆ H @T out ]
o
Where,
[
∆H @ T = ( n glycerol C P glycerol ) + (n FAME CP FAME ) + (n excess MeoH CP excess MeOH ) ] prod (T −T @ 25°C ) −
[( n veg oil CP veg oil ) + (n initial MeOH CP initial MeOH ]
) reac tan t (T −T @ 25°C ) ( 6)
Symbols Definition
ΔH ̊ f @ 25 ̊ C Standard enthalpy formation of product at 25 ̊ C
(J)
ΔH ̊ @ T out Enthalpy of formation of product at operating
temperature (J)
h air Heat transfer coefficient of air (50 W/m2 K)
A reactor Area of reactor (m2)
T reactor Temperature reactor (333 K)
T air Temperature air (308 K)
Total time Total Time for mixing process (3600 s)
GRAVITY SETTLER (GLYCEROL SEPARATION
PROCESS)
[
Q w asted total= (n M eO HC p M eO H ) + (n F A M EC p ) + (n gly C p
FAM E gly ) + (n K O H C p ]
) × (T f − T i )
KOH
Symbol Definition
n MeOH Mol of methanol (mol)
Cp MeOH Specific heat capacity methanol (86.2 J/mol K)
n FAME Mol of FAME(mol)
Cp FAME Specific heat capacity FAME (1.274 J/mol K)
n gly Mol of glycerol(mol)
Cp gly Specific heat capacity glycerol
( 229. 3 J/mol K)
n KOH Mol of potassium hydroxide (mol)
Cp KOH Specific heat capacity potassium hydroxide
(49.4626 J/kg K)
Tf Final temperature system (308K)
Ti Initial temperature system ( 333 K)
- For heterogeneous
catalyst
Q wasted total =Q drop subs tan ce
Q wasted total [
= (n MeOHC p M eOH ) + (n FAM EC p FAM E ) + (n gly C p gly ]
) × (T f − T i)
Symbol Definition
m MeOH Mass of methanol (mol)
Cp MeOH Specific heat capacity methanol (86.2 J/mol K)
m FAME Mol of FAME (mol)
Cp FAME Specific heat capacity FAME (J/mol K)
m gly Mol of glycerol (mol)
Cp gly Specific heat capacity glycerol(229.3 J/mol K)
Tf Final temperature system (308K)
Ti Initial temperature system (333K)
HEATING TANK (METHANOL REMOVAL PROCESS)
Q required total =n MeOH C p MeOH (T f 1−T i1) +n MeOH ∆H vaporizati on+n MeOH C p MeOH (T f 2−T i 2)
Symbol Definition
n MeOH Mol of methanol (mol)
Cp MeOH Specific heat capacity methanol
Tf 1 (86.2 temperature
Final J/mol K) process 1
Ti 1 (308
InitialK)temperature process 1
n MeOH (338)
Mol methanol (mol)
ΔH vaporization Enthalpy of vaporization
Tf 2 methanol (35.3 kJ/mol)
Final temperature process 2
Ti 2 (353
InitialK)temperature process 2
( 338 K)
PURIFICATION TANK (POTASSIUM
HYDROXIDE PURIFICATION PROCESS)
Process Diagram
Model Diagram
Calculation for Amount of Water Needed
Calculation of Final Temperature of
Product
m H 2O C p H 2O (T f −T i H 2O ) =m mix C p mix (Ti mix −T f )
Symbol Definition
m H2O mass of water (g)
Cp H2O Specific heat capacity of water
Tf (Final J/g K)
4.1813temperature FAME with
Ti H2O water (K)
Initial temperature H2O (308 K)
m mix Mass of FAME with KOH (g)
Cp mix Specific heat capacity of FAME
Ti mix with KOH
Initial (J/g K) of FAME
temperature
with KOH (353 K)
DRYER (MOISTURE REMOVAL PROCESS)
Process diagram
Model diagram
Calculation of Heat Required for
Homogeneous Catalyst
Symbol Definition
n water mol of water (mol)
Cp water Specificheat capacity of water
Tf 1 (75.327temperature
Final J/mol K) process 1
Ti 1 (373
InitialK)temperature process 1
ΔH vaporization (from
EnthalpyTf purification process)
of vaporization of
Tf 2 water temperature
Final (40.65 kJ/mol)
process 2
Ti 2 (393
InitialK)temperature process 2
(373 K)
Parameter
selection
Catalyst Homogeneous Heterogeneous
Mass of vegetable oil enter system 90 kg 90 kg
Mass of methanol recover 0 kg 0 kg
Surface area of mixer 0.0628319 m2 0.1099557 m2
Surface area of reactor 0.6126106 m2 0.6283185 m2
Temperature enter preheating process 35 °C 35 °C
Temperature leave preheating process 60 °C 60 °C
Temperature enter mixing process 35 °C 35 °C
Temperature leave mixing process 60 °C 60 °C
Temperature enter transesterification process 60 °C 60 °C
Temperature leave transesterification process 60 °C 60 °C
Temperature enter separation process 60 °C 60 °C
Temperature leave separation process 35 °C 35 °C
Temperature enter removal process 35 °C 35 °C
Temperature leave removal process 80 °C 80 °C
Temperature of mixture ( FAME + KOH ) enter purification 35 °C -
process
Temperature leave drying process 120 °C -
Weight percentage of methanol in FAME 60 % 60 %
Fraction of water in FAME 0.01 -
Solubility of KOH in water 1.21 kg/L -
Area of pipe for heat recovered from methanol removal 0.7539822 m2 1.5707963 m2
Temperature of heat recovered leave 35 °C 35 °C
Temperature of heat recovered enter 80 °C 80 °C
Temperature of water 35 °C 35 °C
Mass of CaO recover from filtration process - 0
Process Diagram
Heat out from
methanol vapor
Hot
Cold water
methanol
Heat in to cold
water
MeOH recovered
Area pipe hot
MeOH
Final Temp Time
MeOH
Vapor MeOH
temperature Heat Recovered
Water
temperature
Model Diagram
Physical Diagram for Heat Recovered Process
Assumptions use :
-Heat release by methanol occur by convection mode only.
-We don’t take into account heat release by conduction mode.
-Total Heat loss from methanol will be absorb by water.
-No heat loss from water to environment.
-We assume temperature of final methanol after heat recovered is 35 ̊ C
(liquid form).
Calculation of Heat Wasted from Methanol
Stream
n M eOHC p M eOH (T f − T i) + n MeOH∆ H condensation+ n M eOHC p M eOH (T f − T i) = h H 2O AM eOH pipe (T water− T M eOH) × total time
Symbol Definition
1.
2. Both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts have their
own advantage and disadvantage.
3. Even heterogeneous catalyst can be reused until 13
times, it still required more cost than homogeneous
catalyst.
4. From our project, we conclude that homogeneous catalyst
is better than heterogeneous catalyst at certain
conditions.
5. Using sodium methoxide catalyst for this biodiesel
production can lead towards better or clear phase
separation between FAME, glycerol and excess methanol.
6. For further improvement towards the biodiesel
production process, heat recovered from methanol can
be apply to purification process.
References
1.
2.
3. Alex H. West, Dusko Posarac and Naoko Ellis. (2007).
Simulation, Case Studies and Optimization of a
Biodiesel Process with a Solid Acid Catalyst.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL REACTOR
ENGINEERING, Vol. 5 (2007), Article A37, 1-8.
4. Alex H. West, Dusko Posarac and Naoko Ellis. (2008).
Assessment of four biodiesel production processes
using HYSYS. Plant. Bioresource Technology, 99 (2008),
6587-6601.
5. Y. Zhang, M.A. Dube, D.D. Mc Lean, M. Kates. (2003). Biodiesel
production from waste cooking oil: 1. Process design
and technological assessment. Bioresource Technology,
90 (2003), 1-16.
6. Y. Zhang, M.A. Dube, D.D. Mc Lean, M. Kates. (2003). Biodiesel
production from waste cooking oil: 2. Economic
assessment and sensitivity analysis. Bioresource
Technology, 90 (2003), 229-240.
5.
6. J.M. Marchetti, V.U. Miguel, A.F. Errazu. (2008). Techno-
economic study of different alternatives for
biodiesel production. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 89
(2008), 740-748.
8. Tsutomu Sakai, Ayato Kawashima, Tetsuya Koshikawa. (2009).
Economic assessment of batch biodiesel production
processes using homogeneous and heterogeneous alkali
catalysts. Bioresource Technology, 100 (2009), 3268-
3276.
9. Albert J. Gotch, Aaron J. Reeder, and Aleesha McCormick.
(2008). STUDY OF HETEROGENEOUS BASE CATALAYSTS FOR
BIODIESEL PRODUCTION. Journal of Undergraduate
Chemistry Research, 4, 58-62.
Q & A
Thank You ………
Kap Kun Krub ………
Terima Kasih ……