DS Vs SS

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Deep Structure vs.

Surface Structure
One of the most important concepts proposed
by Chomsky
The Generativism paradigm claims that the concept of
structural analysis proposed by Structuralism paradigm is
too shallow, it only reaches the level of surface structure.
Surface structure can be defined as the syntactic form
they take as actual sentences.
forms of sentences resulted from modification/
transformation.
Consider these sentences:

(1) You close the door.


(2) The door is closed by you.
(3) Close the door!
The first sentence is active, second is passive, and the last
is imparative.
However, if you take a look those closely, you will find that
those three are very closely related, even identical.
They seem to be identical, since they have the same
undelying abstract representation that is called deep
structure.
deep structure is defined as an abstract level of
structural organization in which all the elements
determining structural interpretation are represented.
If you want to analyze the relation of those three
sentences, the first you have to know about the deep
structure of them, since deep structure is the input
of transformation rules.
We cannot apply transformation rules if you
dont have deep structure.
transformation rules are sets of rules which will change
or move constitiuents in the structures derive from
the phrase structure rules.

From the above example, it can be concluded that deep
structure then is a pure representation of thematic
relations.
Anything which is interpreted as the subject or object of a
given predicate will be in the subject or object position of
that predicate at Deep structure no matter where it is
found at Surface structure.

You might also like