Impact of Technology On Education: PUSD School Board January 17, 2006

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25

Impact of Technology

on Education

PUSD School Board


January 17, 2006
Background

 Growing trend toward globalization


 Increasing importance of technology in
society
 Students need to develop 21st century skills
 Students of today have grown up with digital
technology
Technology in US schools

 Over $10 Billion spent since 1996 on


educational technology
 Students to computer ratios:
– 1983: 125:1
– 2002: 4:1
 Over 8 million computers in US schools
 98% of schools have Internet access
Use of laptops in schools

 12% of US schools have used laptops for


instruction
 Growing trend toward 1:1 programs with 24/7
access
 Maine: laptops to all middle & some high
schools
 Large programs in Virginia, Georgia & Texas
Current educational
applications of technology

 Online blogs  Online reference


 Voice over IP tools
 Interactive  Video clips
whiteboards  Science probes
 E-books replacing  Laptops to write,
textbooks communicate &
 iPods for vocab. research
Development  Spreadsheets
Research results

 Limitations of research
 Need for evaluation & accountability for multi-
billion dollar investments
 Direct impacts: increased test scores &/or
grades
 Indirect impacts: PBL, collaborative learning,
increased student engagement/motivation
Sample research findings

 4th & 8th grade students using simulation &


higher order thinking software showed
increased math scores on 1998 NAEP
 Use of word processor had a positive impact
on quantity & quality of student writing
 5th grade students enrolled in Basic
Skills/Computer Education earned higher
reading, writing & math scores on Stanford 9
1:1Laptop research results

 Microsoft's “Anytime, Anywhere” Project ('96-


00):
– More collaborative work
– More writing & higher quality writing
– Improved research & analysis skills
– Direct own learning
– Readily engage in problem-solving & critical
thinking skills
Laptop results (con't)

 6 New Hampshire middle schools (2005)


 Teachers report:
– Greater student participation in class
– Higher levels of student motivation/engagement
– Increased ability to work in groups
– Increase in positive interaction with peers &
teacher
– Improvement in quality of writing
– Slightly higher ability to retain content
PUSD's laptop immersion at
Harvest Park Middle School

 Began as 6th grade pilot in 01/02, expanded to


7th & 8th
 04/05 enrollment of 259 students
 No significant demographic variation with
school population
 Study looked at student achievement
variables for laptop vs. non-laptop students
Harvest Park Laptops (con't)

 Findings regarding laptop students at HP:


– Higher GPAs
– Higher grades in English & math
– Met or exceeded expectations on District Writing
Assessment
– Scored at or above national average on language
arts portion of CAT 6
– Scored proficient or advanced on English & math
portions of California STAR tests
Barriers to technology
implementation in schools

 Funding – infrastructure & maintenance


 Need for substantial professional development
 Integration with curriculum & overall
educational goals
 Potential for student misuse
 Lack of standards for technological literacy
 Teacher attitudes
 Accountability measures: beyond test scores
Summary

 Evidence supports positive relation between


use of technology & student achievement
 Direct & indirect impacts
 Provision of laptops appears promising
 Need for clear plan; adequate funding;
sufficient professional development & ongoing
support; broader based evaluations.
Impacts of Class Size Reduction

PUSD School Board


January 17, 2006
Background

 CSR: reducing # students in a classroom


assigned to 1 teacher
 Education reform that is publically & politically
popular
 One of the most studied education reforms -
>1,100 studies in past 20 years
Tennessee STAR project

 Largest & most enduring study of CSR


 Longitudinal study of 7,000 students in 70
schools over a 4-year period: '85-'89
 Applied to K-3rd grade classes
 Small: 13-17; Regular: 22-25; Regular & aide
 Follow-up studies as these students
progressed through K-12 schooling
Tennessee STAR results

 Outperformed peers in all achievement


categories
 Especially true for minority students
 Strongest gains for those who entered in K &
stayed in program for 4 years
 Enduring benefits to program shown through
middle & high school grades, test scores,
graduation rates & college entrance
Wisconsin SAGE Project

 K-3 classes of 15:1 beginning in 1986


 Phased in over 3 years with priority to schools
serving low income students
 Largest impact on math test scores
 + impact on reading/language arts scores
 Greatest impact was for African-American
students
 Gains in achievement persisted for up to 6 yrs
California's CSR

 Class sizes K-3 from 29 to 19


 $4.1 billion: $3.3 operations; $0.8 facilities
 Implemented quickly: lack of qualified
teachers and available classrooms
 No testing of students until end of 2nd grade
 Modest gains in student achievement were
identified
Additional benefits of CSR

 Higher teacher morale


 Less time on classroom management
 Greater enthusiasm for school & participation
 Higher attendance levels
 Creating more responsible, productive citizens
Why does CSR work?

 Focus on instruction
 More individualized attention
 Teachers gets to know each student
 Wider range of learning activities (e.g. PBL,
hands-on)
 More positive classroom environment
 Greater student engagement/participation
 Greater parent involvement
Challenges of CSR
implementation

 Availability of qualified teachers


 Availability of facilities
 Debate regarding role of professional
development in success of CSR
 Not a quick fix for poor levels of student
achievement
Financial considerations of
CSR

 One of the costliest education reforms


 Reduce cost through shifting teacher
specialists to classrooms & reducing aides
 Added benefits of CSR may reduce overall
costs in long-run due to teacher retention;
reduced special ed referrals; safer schools;
reduced need for remediation; & reduced drop
out rates
CSR in higher grade levels

 Less evidence due to fewer # studies


 LAUSD: 20 in 8th grade English & ELD
 4th & 8th NAEP math scores with class sizes of
20
 No clear link between smaller class size at
middle & high school with gains in student
achievement
Conclusions

 Positive relation between class size & student


achievement at K-3 levels, especially for
disadvantaged students
 Debate re: optimum size: 15, 17, 20
 Enhanced with rigorous curriculum & qualified,
well-trained teachers
 No conclusions re: CSR at higher grades

You might also like