13.6 Planar Dielectric Waveguides: Excessive Entirely Interfaces
13.6 Planar Dielectric Waveguides: Excessive Entirely Interfaces
13.6 Planar Dielectric Waveguides: Excessive Entirely Interfaces
..1 2
we require that effective impedances, 2s or 2p, be purely
imaginary, zero, or infinite if (1) or (2) is to have unity magnitudes.
Knowing that:
.3
And
.4
.7
Now, from the geometry of Figure 13.20, we can construct the field
distribution of a TE wave in the guide using plane wave
superposition. In the slab region (d/2 < x < d/2), we have
.8
Where
9
.10
The second term in (8) may either add to or subtract from the first
term, since either case would result in a symmetric intensity
distribution in the x direction.
Now, using r = xax + zaz , (8) becomes
.11
.12
Because 1 = n1k0 cos 1, we see that larger values of 1 imply smaller
values of 1 at a given frequency. In addition, larger 1 values result in
a greater number of spatial oscillations of the electric field over the
transverse dimension.
In the slab waveguide, as with the parallel-plate guide, we associate
higher order modes with increasing values of 1.
In the regions above and below the slab, waves propagate according
to wave vectors ku and kd as shown in Figure 13.20. Above the slab,
for example (x > d/2), the TE electric field will be of the form
..13
However, 2 = n2k0 cos 2, where cos 2, given in (5), is imaginary.
We may therefore write
.14
Where 2 is real and is given by (using 5)
.15
..16
.17
The fields expressed in (16) and (17) are those of surface waves. Note
that they propagate in the z direction only, according to exp(jz), but
simply reduce in amplitude with increasing |x|, according to the
exp(2(xd/2)) term in (16) and the exp(2(x+d/2)) term in (17).
These waves represent a certain fraction of the total power in the
mode, and so we see an important fundamental difference between
dielectric waveguides and metal waveguides: in the dielectric guide,
the fields (and guided power) exist over a cross section that extends
beyond the confining boundaries, and in principle they exist over an
infinite cross section.
In practical situations, the exponential decay of the fields above and
below the boundaries is typically sufficient to render the fields
negligible within a few slab thicknesses from each boundary.
The total electric field distribution is composed of the field in all three
regions and is sketched in Figure 13.21 for the first few modes.
Within the slab, the field is oscillatory and is of a similar form to that
of the parallel-plate waveguide. The difference is that the fields in the
slab waveguide do not reach zero at the boundaries but connect to
the evanescent fields above and below the slab.
The restriction is that the TE fields on either side of a boundary
(being tangent to the interface) must match at the boundary.
Specifically,
..18
Applying this condition to (11), (12), (16), and (17) results in the final
expressions for the TE electric field in the symmetric slab waveguide,
for the cases of even and odd symmetry:
..19
..20
The magnetic field for the TE modes will consist of x and z
components, as was true for the parallel-plate guide. Finally, the TM
mode fields will be nearly the same in form as those of TE modes, but
with a simple rotation in polarization of the plane wave components
by 90. Thus, in TM modes, Hy will result, and it will have the same
form as Ey for TE, as presented in (19) and (20).
a finite number of discrete modes will be allowed at a given
frequency, and this number increases as frequency increases. Higher-
order modes are characterized by successively smaller values of 1.
An important difference in the slab waveguide occurs at cutoff for
any mode. We know that = 0 at cutoff in the metal guides. In the
dielectric guide at cutoff, the wave angle, 1, is equal to the critical
angle, c. Then, as the frequency of a given mode is raised, its 1
value increases beyond c in order to maintain transverse resonance,
while maintaining the same number of field oscillations in the
transverse plane.
the wave angle dependence on evanescent decay coefficient, 2, as
given by (15). Note, in that equation, that as 1 increases (as
frequency goes up), 2 also increases, leading to a more rapid falloff
of the fields with increasing distance above and below the slab.
Also, at a given frequency, lower-order modes, having smaller wave
angles, will have lower values of 2 as (15) indicates.
Consequently, when considering several modes propagating together
at a single frequency, the higher-order modes will carry a greater
percentage of their power in the upper and lower regions
surrounding the slab than will modes of lower order.
One can determine the conditions under which modes will propagate
by using the transverse resonance condition, as we did with the
parallel-plate guide. We perform the transverse round trip analysis in
the slab region in the same manner that was done in Section 13.3,
and obtain an equation similar to (37):
21
for TE waves and
22
for the TM case. Eqs. (21) and (22) are called the eigenvalue
equations for the symmetric dielectric slab waveguide.
The phase shifts on reflection, TE and TM, are the phases of the
reflection coefficients, s and p
simple cutoff condition for any TE or TM mode:
.23
Using k0 = 2/, the wavelength range over which single-mode
operation occurs is
.24
EXAMPLE 13.5
A symmetric dielectric slab waveguide is to guide light at wavelength
= 1.30 m. The slab thickness is to be d = 5.00 m, and the
refractive index of the surrounding material is n2 = 1.450. Determine
the maximum allowable refractive index of the slab material that will
allow single TE and TM mode operation.
Solution. Equation (24) can be rewritten in the form,