Presentation 1
Presentation 1
Presentation 1
Expression of a person’s EFFORT TO UNDERSTAND AND INTEGRATE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF HIS OR HER SELF-
IDENTITY as a sexual being so that there can further movement in the direction of mature interpersonal
relationship.
It can be stultifying and isolating when a person “FINDS THE LOCUS OF ALL THE PLEASURE IN HIMSELF.”
Masturbation is a COMPLETE COMPLEX PHENOMENON, and to suggest otherwise is serious disservice to people.
Sigmund Freud
Masturbation is not to regarded as a problem or entity (clinical entity) in itself
but rather should be seen as an action that expresses or reflects some internal psychosexual state.
In adolescence, for example, masturbation is often symptomatic of many nonsexual conflicts. This has
led SIECUS (Sex Information and Education Council of the U.S) to maintain that boredom, frustration,
loneliness, a poor self-image, inadequate boy-girl relationships, conflict with parents, too many
pressure in school, etc., can all create tensions that the adolescent tries to relieve through
masturbation.
In some cases it is not the masturbation that must be examined, but the conflict
of which it is symptom; and counseling or psychotherapy may be indicated.
Psychiatrist Frederick Perls
This is not to say that masturbation is always or even usually selfish act,
but a definite possibility exists that such activity will lead a person “in
the direction of narcissistic rather than interpersonal sexuality.” Clearly
masturbation is not in complete accord with the goal of sexuality,
which is other-oriented love.
When all is said and done, Goergen suggests that it is as false to say that masturbation is always
wrong as it is to say that it is never wrong. What can be most safely maintained is that
masturbation points to the unfinishedness of the process of a person’s sexual and spiritual
integration as a human being.
It is, however, to be challenged toward further growth. We must accept unfinishedness but not choose to
remain there. There will always be the tension between accepting ourselves where we are and striving after
the ideals of Christian life . . . .
We should not be ashamed of our present stage of growth nor should we stagnate there.
M oral Evaluation
Both the Magisterium of the Church – in the course of a
constant tradition – and the moral sense of the faith have
declared without hesitation that masturbation is an
INTRINSICALLY AND SERIOUSLY DISORDERED ACT.
The main reason is that, whatever the motive for acting in this way, the
deliberate use of the sexual faculty outside normal conjugal relations
especially contradicts the finality of the faculty. For it lacks the sexual
relationship called for by the moral order, namely the relationship which
realizes “the fullness of mutual self-giving and human procreation in the
context of true love”
The Church’s official teaching is reiterated in the 1994 Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC),
which says that masturbation “is intrinsically and gravely disordered action.”
At the same time, however, the CCC affirms that in order “to form an
equitable judgment about the subject’s moral responsibility and to guide
pastoral action, one must take into account the affective immaturity, force of
acquired habit, conditions of anxiety, or other psychological or social factors
that lessen or even extenuate moral culpability. (2352)
T h e i s s u e o f a p e r s o n’s m o r a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y
or guilt in masturbating
For a person to be formally guilty of a mortal sin of masturbation, his act must be fully
deliberate choice of what he fully realizes is serious evil.
If the act is performed with only partial realization or only partial choice of the will,
the person is guilty of venial sin.
If there is no free choice of the will, there is no guilt at all, even if the person is aware of
what he is doing. . . .
Serious sin must always involve a fully deliberate choice of what one be fully realizes to be
seriously wrong.
John F. Harvey, O.S.F.S
Reminded people of the moral principle that “spontaneous arousal is not a sin; the fact of struggle against
sexual fantasies indicates that one did not give full, if any, consent; and in matters of doubt concerning
consent the presumption is in favor of non-consent.” Harvey maintains that people, especially the young:
Must come to understand that one cannot sin by accident. If one is careful and sincere in
his spiritual life, in his effort to love God, he is not likely to give full consent to the act of
masturbation.
In attempting to bring these thoughts on the morality of masturbation to
a close, some final observations may be helpful toward obtaining an
overview of the matter.
The folly of masturbation, which consists in the fact that through masturbation “we silence
the Spirit urging us to love.” As a result of this, we end up “being more empty and lonely,”
because the only kind of satisfaction masturbation provides is “momentary and not growth
oriented.”