This document discusses course design for English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses. It addresses key considerations in course design such as whether the course should be intensive or extensive, assessed or non-assessed, focused broadly or narrowly, use common-core or specific materials, and consider the teacher's role as provider vs. facilitator. It also presents four case studies that illustrate how these parameters were implemented in ESP course design. The document emphasizes balancing these various parameters and evolving the course design through evaluation and feedback rather than starting from scratch.
This document discusses course design for English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses. It addresses key considerations in course design such as whether the course should be intensive or extensive, assessed or non-assessed, focused broadly or narrowly, use common-core or specific materials, and consider the teacher's role as provider vs. facilitator. It also presents four case studies that illustrate how these parameters were implemented in ESP course design. The document emphasizes balancing these various parameters and evolving the course design through evaluation and feedback rather than starting from scratch.
This document discusses course design for English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses. It addresses key considerations in course design such as whether the course should be intensive or extensive, assessed or non-assessed, focused broadly or narrowly, use common-core or specific materials, and consider the teacher's role as provider vs. facilitator. It also presents four case studies that illustrate how these parameters were implemented in ESP course design. The document emphasizes balancing these various parameters and evolving the course design through evaluation and feedback rather than starting from scratch.
This document discusses course design for English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses. It addresses key considerations in course design such as whether the course should be intensive or extensive, assessed or non-assessed, focused broadly or narrowly, use common-core or specific materials, and consider the teacher's role as provider vs. facilitator. It also presents four case studies that illustrate how these parameters were implemented in ESP course design. The document emphasizes balancing these various parameters and evolving the course design through evaluation and feedback rather than starting from scratch.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16
NAME : THERESIA SELVINDA WEA (1601542001)
PUTU DEVA ANANDA ISWARI (1601542018)
INDRA MARIONI MBADHO (1601542009) 1. What is the meaning of course design Course design is the process by which the raw data about a learning need is interepted in order to produce an integrated series of teaching-learning. 2. The aim of course design To lead the learners to a particular state of knowledge.This entails the use of the theoretical and empirical information available to produce a syllabus to develop a methodology for teaching those materials and establish evaluation procedures by which progress towards the specified goals will be measured Some of the position are pre-determined by circumstances the client,the environment.others are determined by the course designer.
3.1 Should the course be intensive or extensive?
The meaning is in an intensive course the learners’time is totally commited to that course.In contrast,an extensive course occupies only a small part of a student’s time table or professional person’s work schedule. o Advantages of intensive courses is the students are totally focused on their purpose for learning English and,if the course is residential,they can be immersed in an English-langauge environment,even outside the actual class sessions. o Disadvantage of intensive courses.Without reinforcement ,what is learnt on the intensive course may lie dormant. o Advantages of extensive courses is the course can run in parallel with the subject course or the professional activity and can relate to it ,adapted to it as the learners’experience or needs change,and generally remain flexible. o Disadvantage of extensive courses is the potential lack of continuity between classes,particularly if the classes infrequent. Assessed course Non-assessed course
(a)It raises the status of the (a)Different groups are taught
subject. by different teachers but take (b)It is taken seriously by both the same test. students and the (b) Teachers lost their freedom department. in the choice of topics and (c)It brings responsibilities. material used on the course. (c) Teachers coordinate to ensure that the testing is valid and fair. By immediate need, refer to those needs that students have at the time of the course, while delayed needs refer to those that will become more significant later. 3.5 Teacher as provider or as facilitator/consultant Teacher as provider of input Teacher in this cases is expected to control the class, to provide information about skills and language, to control activities, possible moving into pair or group work.
Teacher as facilitator or consultant:
(a) The ESP teacher manages rather than controls. (b) S/he may not make decisions but will negotiate with the learners. Development: (a) Teacher knows relatively little about the content. (b) Proceeds by pulling together and organizing the information. Broad focus Narrow focus the concentrated on a range of target Concentrate on a few target events, events, such as study or professional for example just the listening skill, skills or variety of genres. or just one or two genre. By pre-experience we mean that learners do not have experience of the target situation at the time of the ESP course By parallel with experience we mean that the English course runs concurrently with the study course or professional activity. 3.7 Common-core or specific material By common-core material we mean material that uses carrier content which is either of a general academic nature or of a general professional nature. By specific material we mean that the material uses carrier content that is drawn directly from the learners’ academic or professional area. 3.8 Homogeneous or heterogeneous groups and motivation Homogeneous: It is possible to undertake more specific work. The main question here is that of the motivation of learners. Heterogeneous: It is difficult to introduce much specific work, It is more appropriate to look for topics and activities that are common to the various interests in the group. The homogeneous/ heterogeneous question is the language level of the students. A fixed course design is laid down in advance of the course and is rarely deviated from. A flexible and negotiated course design allows room for change based on feedback from learners. (Nunan , 1988) 4. Balancing the parameters In planning a course, ESP teachers should first be aware of the options and of the limitations arising from institutional and learner expectations. Initial revisions may be major, but therefore the details may only need fine tuning. 5. Case studies We will now look at four case studies which illustrate the implementation of the parameters described in this chapter. Background : A British and a French company merged,adopting English as the company language. Need analysis procedure : The client provided a briefe of their aims for English and a management college made three draft course design base on different features of the briefe.This was a team taught,one week residential course to simultaneously develop management skills and English language for conducting effective meetings and discussions in English. Course framework :The course was designed to be team taughtand experiental.There are two tutors,the first tutor a human resource development expert who leads the interpersonal skills work ;the other,a language expert leads the language work.Ther role is to facilitate learning throught. Original components in language Use of notes Language guidelines relevant to first meetings Conventions and expression for saying `yes’ or`no’ Language for discussing change,that is dealing with data-based facts and figure Guide self study New aspects oraspects convered Language introducing visual aids Language for structuring a presentation Daily vocabulary development work Intensive listening practice based on video extracts of meetings Input and practice in questioning techiniques Specific practice of summarising Most of the language feedback s combined with the skills feedback Background :Arabic is the main language in Jordan; English is a foreign language. At JUST (Jordanian University of Science and Technology), English is the official medium of course.There is a compulsory undergraduate course in English which all students must pass. The purpose is to raise their level of English language and to try and ensure that no student fails their subject studies.
Need analysis procedure : An initial Target Situation Analysis
(TSA) was conducted using questionnaires with students and staff, plus structured interviews with subject lecturers.Formative evaluation during the next years refined the needs and provided valuable feedback on materials and method.
Lesson record sheets, focus groups with students, staff
discussions, questionnaires, test results and observation were all used for evaluation. Course 1: Course 2
-Compulsory for all new -Compulsory before graduating.
undergraduates. - Duration 12 weeks, total length 36 -Duration 12 weeks, total length 36 hours. hours. -The first units: cover skills for - Units 1~5 Strategies for reading: gathering information. topic sentences, -The second block: deals with paragraph organization, paragraph organization, language and development, skills for the written version. dealing with unknown words, -The third group of units: looks at finding information editing for meaning, quickly. coherence and accuracy. -Units 6~7 Writing laboratory -While the last three units cover oral reports. presentations. -Units 8~12 Explorations in reading, listening and writing. 6.Develop a course outline With the range of ESP courses that have been taught around the world and the materials published, even for a new course, we should not have to start from scratch – to invent a wheel. As with needs analysis, an important part of the process is to learn from what else we and others have done. Evolution rather than revolution or invention may be the route for innovation.
6.1Ordering: criteria for prioritizing
(a) Beginning with target events and rhetorical awareness: - Our starting point is the macro-level- the target events in which the learners want to operate successfully and the necessary rhetorical awareness. -One criterion is according to when the target events are needed by the learners. -A second key criterion is that using or learning certain language or skill is dependent on others. (b) From target events and rhetorical awareness to skill areas to: -At the course design stage these skill areas also have to be ordered and the same criteria apply: what is needed first, what is a building block, what increases confidence?
6.2 The role of materials
We stressed in the chapter on needs analysis the process of discovering, through reading, analyzing texts, observing interactions, and asking questions of experts.Looking at existing materials, we can learn about skill areas and associated language from materials.The final choice of some features to be taught and the order they are taught in will come from the materials we select. The final order (the timetable) was also influenced by practical learning issues such as: (a) varying the kind of activities throughout the day (b) not having heavy input sessions at the end of the day (c) having interactive rather than “passive”immediately after lunch. 6.6 The role of assessment and evaluation Grading is achieved not through the course order / outline but through the materials and methodology. When the language learning will be difficult, the carrier content needs to be easy (but interesting and not trivial).The more difficult an area of language, the more guidance and support a learner needs in exercises and tasks as well as more practice. We have in this unit looked at the parameters for course, design,ilustrating these with four case studies from experience.We have also looked at the questions of ordering and garding.In our final remarks we will restric ourself to two points.The first is to emphasise the importance in course design of looking at other examples from other situation.The second point is about what we have not included in this chapter : We have not described in detail either the theory or practice of the various approaches to syllabus design such as function/national,tasks-based,lexical.