Malocclusion 160605101556

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 34

Malocclusion

Dr Wajiha Anzar
MSc Trainee
Department Of Community
Dentistry
ANGLE’S SYSTEM OF
CLASSIFICATION
• Edward Angle introduced a system of
classifying malocclusion in year 1899.

• Based on the relation of the lower first


permanent molar to the upper first
permanent molar , he classified
malocclusions into three main classes.
• Angle classified malocclusion into the
following broad categories.
• Class I
• Class II – Division 1
• Division 2
• Class III
Angle’s Class I
• The mesio-buccal cusp of maxillary first
permanent molar occludes in buccal groove
of mandibular first permanent molar.

• The patient may exhibit irregularities such as


crowding, spacing, rotations, missing teeth
etc.
Canine Classification
CLASS I: Mesial slope of upper canine coincides
with the distal slope of lower canine.
Angle’s Class II
• The distobuccal cusp of upper first permanent
molar occludes in buccal groove of the lower first
permanent molar.

• Angle has sub-classified class II malocclusions


into two divisions :
• Division I
• Division II
Class II , Division 1
• The classII , division 1 malocclusion is
characterized by procline upper incisors
with a resultant increase in overjet.

• A deep incisor overbite can occur in the


anterior region.
• A characteristic feature of this
malocclusion is the presence of abnormal
muscle activity.
• The upper lip is usually hypotonic, short
and fails to form a lip seal.

• The lower lip cushions the palatal aspect


of the upper teeth, a feature typical of a
class II, division 1 referred to as ‘lip trap’

•Class II, Division 1 occurs when the


permanent first molars are in Class II and
the permanent maxillary central incisors
are either normal or slightly protruded out
toward the lips.
Canine Classification
• CLASS II : Distal slope of upper canine
coincides with the mesial slope of lower
canine.
Class II, Division 2
• As in Class II , Division I Malocclusion ,
the Division 2 also exhibits a Class II
molar relationship.

• The classic feature of this malocclusion is


the presence of lingually inclined upper
central incisors and labially tipped upper
lateral incisors overlapping the central
incisors.
Class II, Sub-division
• When a Class II molar relation exists on
one side and a class I relation on the other
side, it is referred to as Class II, sub-
division .

• Based on whether it is a Division I or


Division 2 it can be called Class II, Division
2, sub-division or Class II, Division2 , sub-
division.
Angle’s Class III
• The malocclusion exhibits a classIII molar
relation with the mesio-buccal cusp of the
maxillary first permanent molar occluding
in the interdental space between the
mandibular first and second molars.

• Class III malocclusion can be classified


into true ClassIII and pseudo Class III
True ClassIII

• In this classification, the maxillary first


molar is more to the back of the
mandibular first molar than normal; the
buccal groove of the mandibular first molar
is mesial to the mesiobuccal cusp of the
maxillary first molar.
• The facial profile is termed prognathic.
This is a skeletal Class III malocclusion of
genetic origin that can occur due to the
following causes:
• a- Excessively large mandible
• b- Forwardly placed mandible
• c- smaller than normal maxilla
• d- repositioned maxilla
• e- combination of the above causes

• Patients can present with a normal overjet,


an edge to edge incisor relationship or and
anteriro cross bite.
Class III
Canine Classification
• CLASS III : The distal surface of the
mandibular canine is mesial to the mesial
surface of maxillary canine by at least a
width of 1 premolar.
Pseudo Class III
• This type of malocclusion is produced by a
forward movement of the mandible during
jaw closure,

• Thus it is also called ‘postural’ or ‘habitual’


Class III malocclusion.
Class III, Sub-division
• This is a condition characterized by a
Class III molar relation on one side and a
ClassI relation on the other side.
SUMMARY
Drawbacks of Angle’s
Classification
• 1- Angle considered malocclusion only in
the anterioposterior plane. He did not
consider malocclusions in the transverse
and vertical planes.
• 2- Angle considered the first permanent
molars as fixed points in the skull. But this
is not found to be so
• 3- The classification cannot be applied in
the first permanent molars are extracted or
missing.

• 4- The classification cannot be applied to


the deciduous dentition.

• 5- The classification does not differentiate


between skeletal and dental malocclusions
• 6- The classification does not highlight the
etiology of malocclusion.

• 7- Individual tooth malpositions have not


been considered by Angle.
THANKYOU

You might also like