Bank Deposits
Bank Deposits
Bank Deposits
• officers of the bank cannot be held liable for estafa under Art. 315
(1)(b)of the Revised Penal Code for authorizing the use of the
money deposited, even if the bank failed to return the amount
deposited. The money that is deposited is not held in trust by the
bank (Guingona vs. City Fiscal of Mla, 128SCRA 577)
• 3rd persons who may have a right to the money deposited cannot hold the
bank responsible unless there is a court order or garnishment. The duty of
the bank is to its creditor-depositor and not to 3rd persons (Fulton Iron
Works Co. vs. China Banking Corp., G.R. No. 32576, Nov. 6, 1930). If a
3rd person has a valid right over the money deposited, he must prove the
same before a court of competent jurisdiction.
• bank deposits are not preferred credits under the Civil Code (Central Bank
vs. Morfe, 63 SCRA 114)
• the bank has the right to compensation. It can set-off the deposits with the
indebtedness of the depositor that are due and demandable (Gullas vs. PNB,
62 SCRA 519).
Likewise, it can set-off the value of dishonored checks that were
previously credited (BPI vs. C.A., et. al., G.R. No. 136202, Jan. 25,
2007).
NOTE:
• bank deposit not a trust under the NCC. The amount is delivered to the bank
by the depositor not as trustor but as a creditor. In an ordinary trust agreement,
the trustee does not become the owner of the property; whereas in a deposit the
bank becomes the owner of the cash that was deposited subject to the
obligation to pay the depositor. Unlike an ordinary trustee who cannot use the
money held in trust for his own benefit, the bank is free to use the money
deposited for its own use.
Unilateral Freezing of Account, Not Allowed-
The person whose name appears in the passbook as depositor and
other bank documents is presumed to be the owner of the money in the
bank account. The depositary bank does not have a unilateral right to
freeze the accounts of its depositor based on its mere suspicion that the
funds therein were proceeds of fraudulent acts.(BPI Family Bank vs.
Amado Franco and Kurtis of Appeals, G.R. No. 123498, Nov. 23,
2007)
But a bank must not release the funds if the same was already
garnished at the instance of third persons.
Bank’s Insolvency: Effect on Deposit
In Phil. Bank of Commerce vs. C.A., G.R.No. 97626, March 14, 1997, The Court
described the process as follows:
1. current account deposits are accepted by the bank on the basis of deposit slips
prepared and signed by the depositor, the latter’s agent or representative;
2. who (depositor) indicates therein the current account number to which the deposit
is to be credited;
• Also, the bank may directly credit the account of the depositor
whenever the bank is obligated to pay an amount to the same
depositor.
Deposit Slips -
They serve as proof that an amount was deposited in an account.
In Prudential Bank vs. Chonney Lim, ___________________, (pg. 56,
Red Book)