Numerical Modeling: Tube-Wave Reflections in Cased Borehole
Numerical Modeling: Tube-Wave Reflections in Cased Borehole
Numerical Modeling: Tube-Wave Reflections in Cased Borehole
Tube-wave reflections in
cased borehole
Alexandrov Dmitriy,
Saint-Petersburg State University
Outline Modeling approaches 1D effective wavenumber approach
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Limitations Conclusions
Outline
Modeling approaches:
1D effective wavenumber approach
finite-difference
Wave field in cased borehole
wave field in isotropic homogeneous fluid
wave field in isotropic homogeneous elastic media
Reflection from geological interfaces behind casing;
Reflection from corroded section of the casing;
Response of perforation in cased borehole:
Idealized disk-shaped perforation
Idealized zero-length disk-shaped perforation
1D approach limitations;
Conclusions.
Introduction
Modeling approaches
Boundary conditions:
Motion equation: r
r
x2
n
�2ui �
tik x1 ur
rf 2 = tik = l f d ik divu = - pd ik T
�t �
xk
r
�u 2 r
r f 2 = l f grad div u Ti = tik nk
�t
1 2
Dp( x, y, z , t ) - 2 �t p( x, y, z , t ) = d (t )d ( x, y, z )
vf
r 1 lf
p = -div u, =
vf r f
2
w2
DP(r , k , w ) + 2 P(r , k , w ) = d (r )
vf
i (2) k2 1
P(r , k , w ) = C f J 0 (-ia f r ) + H 0 (-ia f r ), af =w 2 - 2
4 w vf
Ur �
� a
�f 1J ( - ia f r ) � 1 a f H1 (-ia f r ) �
� (2)
� �= C f �- - a �- 2 �
� �
�
U
�z� � kJ 0 ( i f r ) � 4 r f w -
� 0kH (2)
( -ia f r ) �
Tube-wave reflections in cased borehole
AlexandrovDmitriy, StPSU, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Outline Modeling approaches 1D effective wavenumber approach
Wavefield in cased borehole Results Limitations Conclusions
Motion equation:
�2ui �
t r 1 �� uk �
ui �
r f 2 = ik tik = l f d ik divu + 2me ik , e ik = � + �
�t �
xk 2 ��
xk � xi �
r
�u 2 r r
r 2 = (l + 2m )grad div u - m rot rot u
�t
Ur �
� �a p H1(2) (-ia p r ) � �-kH1(2) (-ia s r ) �
� �= C p �
� �
�
+ Cs � (2) �
�-kH 0 (-ia p r ) � � a s H 0 (-ia s r ) �
(2)
Uz �
�
Boundary conditions
Continuity of displacement:
U r ( R + 0) = U r ( R - 0)
ur ur
U ( R + a + 0) = U ( R + a - 0)
Continuity of stress vector:
trr R+0
= trr R -0
trr R+a+0
= trr R + a -0
trz R+0
= trz R -0
trz R+a+0
= trz R + a -0
ur ur ur � ur
M
MC = D � C = D,
det M
ur
C = { C f , C pc + , C pc - , Csc+ , Csc- , C pe + , Cse+ }
Dispersion equation:
det M = 0 � k = k (w )
Zero-length perforation
(break in casing)
Limitations
Low frequency approximation
for tube-wave slowness
(White J.E. 1984):
�1 1 �
cT = r � + �
�B M �
ur p
- =0
R 2M
ur p
-
deviation = 2 R 2M
�u p �
max � r - �
�2 R 2 M �
Limitations
Relative error defined as:
fmax
2
� |R
fmin
1D ( f ) - RFD ( f ) | df
fmax
� (R
fmin 1D ( f ) + RFD ( f ) ) df
Considered model:
Reflection coefficients
Reflection coefficients
Finite-difference code h =2
1D approach R
Tube-wave reflections in cased borehole
AlexandrovDmitriy, StPSU, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Outline Modeling approaches 1D effective wavenumber approach
Wavefield in cased borehole Results Limitations Conclusions
Reflection coefficients
Finite-difference code h =4
1D approach R
Tube-wave reflections in cased borehole
AlexandrovDmitriy, StPSU, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Outline Modeling approaches 1D effective wavenumber approach
Wavefield in cased borehole Results Limitations Conclusions
Conclusions
Validated 1D approach for
multi-layered media (cased boreholes)
inhomogeneous borehole casing
idealized perforations in cased borehole
Defined the limitations for 1D
approach
References
References
Bakulin, A., Gurevich, B., Ciz, R., and Ziatdinov S., 2005, Tube-wave reflection from a
porous permeable layer with an idealized perforation: 75th Annual Meeting, Society of
Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstract, 332-335.
Krauklis, P. V., and A. P. Krauklis, 2005, Tube Wave Reflection and Transmission on the
Fracture: 67th Meeting, EAGE, Expanded Abstracts, P217.
Medlin, W.L., Schmitt, D.P., 1994, Fracture diagnostics with tube-wave reflections logs:
Journal of Petroleum Technology, March, 239-248.
Paige, R.W., L.R. Murray, and J.D.M. Roberts, 1995, Field applications of hydraulic
impedance testing for fracture measurements: SPE Production and Facilities, February,
7-12.
Tang, X. M., and C. H. Cheng, 1993, Borehole Stoneley waves propagation across
permeable structures: Geophysical Prospecting, 41, 165-187.
Tezuka, K., C.H. Cheng, and X.M. Tang, 1997, Modeling of low-frequency Stoneley-
wave propagation in an irregular borehole: Geophysics, 62, 1047-1058.
White, J. E., 1983, Underground sound, Elsevier.
Winkler, K. W., H. Liu, and D.L. Johnson, 1989, Permeability and borehole Stoneley
waves: Comparison between experiment and theory: Geophysics, 54, 66–75.
Formation parameters
Longitudinal Shear velocity Density
velocity (m/s) (m/s) (kg/m3)
Elastic half- 3500 2500 3400
spaces
Fluid 1500 - 1000
Casing 1 6000 3000 7000
(steel)
Casing 2 2840 1480 1200
(plastic)
Layer 1 3100 1800 2600
Layer 2 3700 2400 3000
Corroded 1200 600 1400
section 1
Corroded 3000 1500 3500
section 2
Corroded 4200 2100 4900
section 3