Accounting Info - Updated partHDTASTF - Roldan

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

What is WorldCom?

• It is America's second-biggest
long-distance phone company,
built up over the years through a
dizzying array of mergers and
acquisitions by its founder,
Bernard Ebbers
How did WorldCom
begin?
• WorldCom came into existence
as a result of a merger between
an obscure long-distance resale
company, LDDS (Long Distance
Discount Service), and two
smaller firms, MFS
Communications and UUnet in
the early 1990s. The acquisition
spree culminated in the 1998
$37bn merger with MCI,
America's second-largest long-
distance phone company after
AT&T.
How did WorldCom
begin?
• WorldCom was not just the
biggest accounting scandal in the
history of the United States, but
also one of the biggest
bankruptcies. A
telecommunications giant, the
revelation that it had cooked
its books came on the heels of
the Enron and Tyco frauds, which
had rocked the financial markets.
Breaking down
WorldCom
WorldCom

• Its CEO, Bernie Ebbers had built the company


into one of America’s leading long-distance
phone companies, by buying other telecom
companies.

• WorldCom has become a byword


for “accounting fraud”

• a warning to investors that when things seem too


good to be true, they just might be.

• This spate of corporate crime led to


the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in July 2002
WorldCom

• But when the tech boom turned to bust, and companies


slashed spending on telecoms services and equipment,
WorldCom resorted to accounting tricks to maintain the
appearance of ever-growing profitability.

• it was revealed that in the year 2000 he had borrowed


$400 million from Bank of America to cover margin
calls using his WorldCom shares as collateral. As a
result, Ebbers lost his fortune.

• In late June 2002, World Com announced


that it had inflated assets by $ 3.5B, the
largest accounting fraud in history
WorldCom

WorldCom filed for bankruptcy on July 21, 2002, only a month after
its auditor, Arthur Andersen, was convicted of obstruction of justice
for shredding documents related to its audit of Enron, ‘America’s
Most Innovative Company’. Arthur Andersen, which had audited
WorldCom's 2001 financial statements, and reviewed WorldCom’s
books for the first quarter of 2002, was later to have ignored memos
from WorldCom executives informing them that the company was
inflating profits by improperly accounting for expenses.
Fraudulent
Activities
• This was not a sophisticated fraud. To
hide its falling profitability, WorldCom
had simply inflated net income and cash
flow by recording expenses as
investments. By capitalizing expenses it
exaggerated profits by around $3 billion
in 2001 and $797 in Q1 2002, and
reported a profit of $1.4 billion instead of
a net loss.
The Effect of Fallout
• Removal of Top Management:
− Bernard Ebbers
 Ex-WorldCom CEO

− Scott Sullivan
 Former CFO of WorldCom

− David Myers
 Former WorldCom controller

• Replacement of Board of Directors


The Effect of Fallout
• It has an effect on:

 Telecommunication Market

 Stock Market

 Investment and Lender


How did the auditors
spot the fraud?
• it overstated its profits by $3.8bn.

• The group has admitted that it did not


actually make the $1.4bn of profits it
reported in 2001, nor the $130m stated
during the first three months of 2002.
How did the auditors
spot the fraud?
• Andersen said that Mr Sullivan withheld
information during the audit.

• Andersen discovered that the expenses


had been reported as investment

• it advised WorldCom's audit committee


and its new management that financial
statements for 2001 should not be relied
upon.

• WorldCom replaced Andersen with


KPMG last month.
What Could Have
Been Done to Prevent
the Scandal?
• Internal Environment

Strategy (or lack thereof)

 A competitive strategy searches for a favorable


competitive position in a company’s
industry, aiming to establish a position in which
the company is profitable and sustainable
against its competitors. The management at
WorldCom was so determined to grow that it not
only failed to create a competitive strategy, but
also did not see that with growth comes “the
need to maintain” to prosper. In the end, that
lack of strategy prevented it from effectively
planning and determining a position to acquire
that prosperity.
What Could Have
Been Done to Prevent
the Scandal?
• Company Culture

Top Management’s Managing Style

 To prevent fraud, the opportunity to commit fraud


should be minimal or non existent. Creating a work
culture of “honesty, openness, and assistance” is key
to fraud prevention. First, it is important to hire
honest people and train them in fraud awareness,
and to present a code of conduct or ethics that is not
only stated on a piece of paper, but is truly respected
and followed by other employees including top
management.
Second, a positive work environment must be create
d. Third, employees must be provided with
assistance programs.
What Could Have
Been Done to Prevent
the Scandal?
• Company Culture

Top Management’s Managing Style

 Implementing a code of ethics and having


employees read and sign it periodically can
reinforce ethical conduct as well emphasize that it
is important to the company. The lack of a code of
ethics at WorldCom shows that no training on
awareness of fraud or ethics was conducted.
Therefore, it is very possible that when the
employees reported existing customers as new
ones, they were not aware of the obdurate
consequences that may occur.
What Could Have
Been Done to Prevent
the Scandal?
• Company Culture

Top Management’s Managing Style

 A low fraud environment could have been created if Worl


dCom’s culture consisted of positive work environment
elements such as employee assistance programs that
make it easier for the employees to not only report fraud,
but also decrease their own likelihood of committing it.
Open door policies, positive personnel, and operating
procedures could have been implemented to diminish
the barrier between employees and upper management.
Unfortunately, in the case of WorldCom, the personnel
themselves were involved in the fraud. Yet, if the
personnel were the ones to implement the positive work
environment, they might not have been involved in the
fraud in the first place.

You might also like