Multiple Riser Configurations Top-Tensioned Risers Hybrid Riser System
Multiple Riser Configurations Top-Tensioned Risers Hybrid Riser System
Multiple Riser Configurations Top-Tensioned Risers Hybrid Riser System
1
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
2
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Attached Risers – Used on Fixed Platforms, Concrete gravity Structures & Compliant
Towers.
Steel Catenary Risers – Connect Seafloor facilities to production facilities above as
well as two floating production platforms.
Top Tensioned Risers – Completely vertical systems that terminate directly below the
facility.
Flexible & Hybrid Risers – Ideal for floating facilities as vertical & horizontal
movement take place.
Single Line Offset Risers – Relatively new, consists of a vertical steel riser section
connected by a jumper to the production vessel.
Drilling Risers – Connect the subsea BOP stack at the bottom to the rig at the top, and
transport the drilling fluid to surface.
3
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Pull tube risers (used on fixed structures ) are pipelines or flow lines that are threaded up
the center of the facility. For pull tube risers, a pull tube with a diameter wider than the
riser is preinstalled on the facility. Then, a wire rope is attached to a pipeline or flow line
on the seafloor. The line is then pulled through the pull tube to the topsides, bringing the
pipe along with it.
Steel catenary risers use this curve theory, as well. Used to connect the seafloor to
production facilities above, as well as connect two floating production platforms, steel
catenary risers are common on TLPs, FPSOs and spars, as well as fixed structures,
compliant towers and gravity structures. While this curved riser can withstand some
motion, excessive movement can cause problems.
4
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Riser towers were built to lift the risers the considerable height to reach the FPSO on the
water's surface. Ideal for ultra-deep water environments, this riser design incorporates a
steel column tower that reaches almost to the surface of the water, and this tower is
topped with a massive buoyancy tank. The risers are located inside the tower, spanning the
distance from the seafloor to the top of the tower and the buoyancy tanks. The buoyancy
of the tanks keeps the risers tensioned in place. Flexible risers are then connected to the
vertical risers and ultimately to the facility above.
5
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
6
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
While production and import/export risers transfer hydrocarbons and production materials
during the production phase of development; drilling risers transfer mud to the surface
during drilling activities. Connected to the subsea BOP stack at the bottom and the rig at
the top, drilling risers temporarily connect the wellbore to the surface to ensure drilling
fluids to not leak into the water.
7
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Objectives
8
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The riser system must be arranged so that the external loading is kept within acceptable
limits with regard to:
Tension
Bending
Torsion
Compression
Interference
9
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The first step in riser design is to develop to address the pipeline approaches towards the
platform in close co-operation with the Client.
Next for each individual pipeline a routing for the riser through the jacket bracing has to
be established.
The riser must be routed close enough to the main jacket legs or bracing members such
that it can be supported at regular intervals.
Routing the riser alongside a main leg allows supports to be spaced at almost any desired
interval.
Large diameter risers sometimes only need to be supported at plan bracing elevations.
Smaller diameter risers may have to be housed in (or outside) a caisson in order to
provide adequate support. In developing a layout all bends in the riser should be bent at
a five diameters bend radius or more, to permit pigging operations.
10
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
11
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The protection of the risers in the splash zone is particularly important as the risers
must be protected against possible boat impact. Either the riser must be protected in
the splash zone or routed behind a jacket structural member.
Risers should never be supported from a member susceptible to ship impact damage.
Routing must also bear in mind that risers will be inspected annually and they should
thus not be routed too far inside the structure such that diver access will be difficult.
Following the piper Alpha disaster it is prudent to route the risers as far away from the
living quarters as possible. This is to prevent the consequence of jet fires.
12
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Intelligent Pigging
In the selection of the internal or external diameter due consideration should be given
to intelligently pigging. As a consequence it is recommended to maintain constant
internal diameter and change the external diameter in accordance with the required
wall thickness.
13
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
A riser joint is constructed of seamless pipe with mechanical connectors welded on the
ends.
Kill/choke lines are attached to the riser by extended flanges of the connector.
The riser can be run in a manner similar to drill pipes by stabbing one stalk at a time into
the string and tightening the connector.
Flexible joints
Flexible joints allow limited angular motion of the riser. In some cases, these flexible
joints may be a series of ball joints.
Pressure compensated flexible joints should be used to decrease the torque required to
deflect the joint.
The forces acting on the joint push the inner ball against the outer casing, causing the
joint to bind.
To decrease the required torque hydraulic fluid is injected to spread apart and lubricate
the moving parts. With the large area involved, relatively small pressure are required.
14
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Slip joints
Buoyancy modules
Buoyancy modules can be attached to the riser to decrease the tension required at the
surface.
These modules may be thin-walled air cans or fabricated syntactic foam modules that are
strapped to the riser.
These buoyancy modules require careful design and the material for their
construction needs to be selected appropriately so as to ensure that they have a long-
term resistance to water absorption.
15
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The end fittings provide the important function of ensuring that the riser loads (in
tension, bending and torsion) are satisfactorily resisted whilst ensuring that a
comprehensive sealing system is attached both radially and axially.
The adequacy of terminations must be determined through careful detailed design,
prototype as well as through in-service experience.
Bending stiffener
This is normally located at the bottom and top connections. The purpose is to provide
additional resistance to over-bending of the riser at critical points (such as the ends of
the riser, where the stiffness is increased to infinity).
16
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Design Codes
API 16Q for drilling riser
API 2RD for production riser attached to floating systems
API 17B for flexible pipes
ISO 13628-5 for steel tube umbilical
API 17A: Design and operation of subsea production systems
API 17B: Flexible pipe
API 17C: Through flow line systems
API 17D: Subsea wellhead and Christmas tree equipment
API 17E: Subsea production control umbilical
API 17G: Design and operation of completion/work over riser systems
API 17I: Installation of subsea umbilical
API 17J: Un-bonded flexible pipe
API 17K: Bonded flexible pipe
17
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
References:
Petroleum and natural gas industries ISO 13628
(Design and operation of subsea production systems)
Part 1:General requirements and recommendations
Part 2: Un-bonded flexible pipe systems for subsea and marine applications
Part 3: Through flow line (TFL) systems
Part 4: Subsea wellhead and tree equipment
Part 5: Subsea umbilical
Part 6: Subsea production control systems
Part 7: Completion/work over riser systems
Part 8: Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) interfaces on subsea production
systems
Part 9: Remotely Operated Tool (ROT) intervention systems
Part 10: Specification for bonded flexible pipe
Part 11: Flexible pipe systems for subsea and marine applications
19
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Loadings: Functional Loads on Riser
Weights - For riser assessment the consequences of the following weights will have to be
determined: self weight, contents (water), buoyancy and marine growth corrosion
protection, flanges and supports.
Internal pressure - The internal design pressure should be equal to the pressure
specified in IP6** of 1.5 times the maximum working pressure. The maximum working
pressure is to be used when combined with the extreme environmental condition. It
should be noted that hydrostatic testing in the fabrication yard with the riser filled with
water can be the limiting equivalent static stress check for the riser.
External hydrostatic pressure - The external pressure will only be of importance for
thin-walled, empty risers (or gas-risers) in deeper water.
Thermal expansion - Through proper layout (see prev. slides) the effects of temperature
differentials between the internal riser contents and exterior can be minimized.
Subsea Movements - The loads imposed by the pipeline on the bottom end of the riser
due to pipeline expansion or pipeline scour or permanent platform displacement are to
be incorporated.
Topsides interaction - The relative displacement of the piping system on the deck may
have an effect on the riser.
Slug Loading - This condition will occur when pigging the pipeline.
** Institute of Petroleum Model Code of Safe Practice, Part 6 Pipeline Safety Code
20
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Loadings: Transportation & Installation Loads
Transportation
Roll, heave, pitch, yaw and sway accelerations during transportation can be predicted
by linear motion theory. Predicted accelerations need to be resolved from space-
centered axes into body-centered axes. Beam seas, head seas, and quartering seas
should be considered although seas will generally produce the highest accelerations.
Maximum resolved body forces are unlikely to exceed 0.75g. Parts of the structure (e.g.
bottle sections, buoyancy tubes) may enter the water during transportation. Here it
should be noted that linear theory will over predict accelerations but that model test
data will give more realistic predictions.
Furthermore risers and attachments may be subjected to wave slam which should be
properly addressed.
21
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Loadings: Transportation & Installation Loads (Cont..)
Pile Driving Vibrations
In order to reduce damage to supports and attachments the following recommendation are
made:-
Apply larger diameter pipes and/or doubler plates for anode supports
Use welding rather than bolting
Employ half round pipes for grout distribution ring
Arrange the routing of attachments away from the pile sleeves
Check recent project design briefs on this subject
22
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Loadings: Environmental Loads
The design should include the following design checks.
Check against the wave loads for the design winter storm. Water particle velocities can
be extracted for wave grid runs for the structure. Because attachments are small, drag
forces should predominate.
The drag coefficient used in platform design (CD = 0.7) is significantly smaller then
measured in a laboratory environment. Its justification is that it leads to realistic total
platform leading and most platform members are governed more by total rather than
local loading. For risers, conductors and caissons this is different and local loading is
governing.
Therefore it is good engineering practice to design these components using
CD = 1.0
Increased water particle velocity allowance should be made for increased water particle
velocity due to proximity of member to which attached. As a simple rule of thumb, twice
the free stream velocity may be used at any point within half a tubular diameter.
A more accurate relation is
v = vo (1 + r²/a²)
where r is the distance from the center and a the radius of this tubular.
23
Loadings: Environmental Loads (Contd…)
24
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Loadings: Environmental Loads (Contd…)
25
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Parts of Riser:-
26
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Parts of Riser:-
27
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Parts of Riser:-
28
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Parts of Riser:-
29
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Parts of Riser:-
30
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
31
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Various analysis tools are available for riser design, examples of these are:
32
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
33
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
GENERAL
The design of the risers shall be based on the Institute of Petroleum Pipeline
Safety Code (Latest Edition) which is Part 6 of IP Model Code of Safe Practice,
and IP6 Supplements including revisions. (Other codes shall also be applicable
as per project / client standards.
With the exception of the hoop stress check, all calculations are to be based
on nominal wall thickness.
The hoop stress is to be checked using minimum thickness defined as 12½%
less than nominal thickness for diameters less than or equal to 18" and 5% less
than nominal for diameters greater than or equal to 20".
All stress criteria are to be satisfied for all points on the riser.
34
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The most important features for the finite element modeling are listed below:
Beam or bar element based on small strain theory.
Description of non-linear material properties.
Unlimited rotation and translation in 3D space.
Stiffness contribution from material properties as well as geometric
stiffness.
Allowing varying cross-sectional properties.
35
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The results from the finite element analysis are listed below:
Nodal point co-ordinates;
Curvature at nodal points;
Axial forces, bending moment, shear forces and torsion.
36
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
37
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Plots
System geometry;
Force variation along lines;
Pipe wall forces;
Geometry during variation of parameters;
Response time series;
Vessel motion transfer function;
Animation of the dynamic behavior of the complete system including
support vessel and exciting waves.
Tables
Support forces;
Pipe wall forces;
Velocities and accelerations from wave and vessel motion time series;
38
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The maximum hoop stress (h) (IP-6 Section 4.2.2) should not exceed 60% of the
specified minimum yield stress (y), and is calculated by:
𝑃𝑟𝑜
𝜎ℎ = ≤ 0.60 𝜎𝑦
𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑛
Where
P = Design Pressure
ro = Outside Radius
tmin = Minimum Wall Thickness
The minimum wall thickness is equal to the nominal thickness minus the
thickness tolerance and the thickness corrosion. The hoop stress may be
increased to 0.90 y for the hydrostatic pressure condition.
39
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The expansion stresses (e) due to pressure and temperature (IP-6 Section
4.2.5.7) are calculated according to the formula below and should not exceed
72% of specified minimum yield stress:
MA = Torque
MB = In-plane Bending Moment
MC = Out of plane Bending Moment
ii = In-plane intensification factor
io = Out of plane intensification factor
Z = Section Modulus
All moments are due to the pressure and temperature expansion of the riser. The
displacements and forces at the riser to spool piece flange shall be taken into account.
40
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
(𝑀𝐵2+𝑀𝐶2) 𝐹𝑎
𝜎𝑤 = + 1
𝑍 𝐴
Where
3
Fa = Axial Force
A = Pipe metal Cross sectional Area
𝜎𝐿 = 𝜎𝑤 + 𝜎𝑝 ≤ 0.54 𝜎𝑦
𝑃. 𝑟𝑖2 2
𝜎𝑝 =
(𝑟𝑜2 − 𝑟𝑖2)
Where
ro = Out of plane Bending Moment
ri = In-plane intensification factor
41
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
SLUG LOADINGS
Contractor shall consider the effects of slug induced loadings in the design of
the risers. Loadings and design procedures, including fatigue, shall be agreed
with Client.
42
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The following environmental load stress check not specified in the IP code must
also be satisfied. This is a check that the riser will not fail under the maximum
operating plus extreme environmental loads. The intention is not to exceed the
Von Mises equivalent stress criterion.
𝜎𝑇 = 𝜎𝐿 ± 𝜎𝑆 ≤ 0.9 𝜎𝑦
Where
L = Longitudinal Stress
S = Max. Direct Stress due to 100yr Storm waves and currents
43
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Von Mises equivalent stress (eq) is calculated according to the following formula
for all points on the riser, and should not exceed 90% of specified minimum yield
stress:
Where
44
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
It is noted that the allowable Von Mises stresses in the DNV pipeline & riser code
are somewhat different; a full set allowable stresses is given in the table below.
45
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The ability of the risers to withstand cyclic loading shall be considered. The
Department of Energy F2 curve / DNV / API and Miner's rule shall be applied to
assess the cumulative damage, including from the following sources:
In addition a stress concentration factor (SCF) for single sided closure welds of
1.4 may have to be considered. The fatigue life thus calculated shall at all points
be in excess of three times the design life of the jacket. It is common practice to
carry out the detailed fatigue analysis on pre-installed risers or those risers which
are installed at the beginning of the platform life as part of the substructure
fatigue analysis.
46
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Service Cycles
Fifty shutdown and start-up cycles each year shall be assumed when assessing the
fatigue due to cyclic internal pressure and temperature loading. Note that
pressure hoop stress may exhibit the largest direct stress range over most of the
riser, rather than longitudinal stresses.
Wave Loading
A deterministic analysis shall be used to assess fatigue. The stress may either be
drawn from a dynamic analysis or a static analysis combined with dynamic
amplification factors.
Based on DnV
47
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
48
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION
Dynamic amplification can only be assessed accurately if the acceleration versus
time history is specified or calculated using a time-domain analysis of the pile
driving process. In the absence of a detailed analysis a uniform dynamic
amplification factor (DAF) should be applied of:
1.5 < DAF < 2.0.
49
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
ATTENUATION
Each blow will lead to vibrations of the anode the amplitude of which will be
reduced in time due to damping.
Using a damping coefficient ksi = 0.02 the amplitude reduction for each full cycle
will be reflected in a factor r given by:
r = exp(-2ð ksi) = 0.88
50
RISERS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
51
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
52
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Load Combinations
53
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The reference life method of fatigue analysis enables the relatively simple calculation of fatigue life given that certain
parameters pertaining to the Bass Strait wave envelopes are known and do not vary.
An arbitrary stress range is input into the formula which has a unique reference fatigue life. A stress range of 690 MPa
has been chosen as the reference.
54
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
DESIGN PARAMETERS
The following design parameters should be used for a standardized design of long
bolted clamps.
1) Ultimate coefficient of friction (steel to steel/inorganic zinc silicate coating) =
0.25
2) Ultimate load safety factor on frictional resistance = 1.5
3) Ultimate load factor for punching of stub on top plate = 1.5
4) Load factor for checking and destressing of bolts= 1.1 to 1.21*
* Recommended actual "induced pretension" should include a 10% increase on the design bolt pretension
to allow for inaccuracies in bolt tensioning equipment and a further 10% increase for bolt relaxation if
bolts are tightened one at a time. The recommended "induced bolt pretension" should not exceed
0.72Fy (396 MPa).
55
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
56
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
57
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
DESIGN LOADINGS
Types of Forces on Clamps
58
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
59
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
60
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
LOADS
The design loads shall be taken as the worst
combination.
Clamp Configuration - The most suitable
configuration of clamp and support stub should
be selected taking into consideration:
the degree of restraint required
amount of adjustment required
ease of installation
See Figure on next slide for typical clamp
configurations.
Component Loads - for design purposes, the
loads acting on the clamp configuration are to
be resolved about the major axes of each
component. Refer to Figure (this slide) for
details of force components.
61
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
62
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Either a) or b) above may govern the allowable bolt tension, although b) will usually only be critical
when the clamped member is in tension exceeding 110 MPa.
63
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
The bolt design procedure will be divided into two basic parts:
Frictional Resistance - Bolt force required to prevent clamp sliding;
Radial Contact Pressure - Bolt force required to ensure that contact pressure is
maintained at all points along the clamp.
64
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
65
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Frictional Resistance
There can be six components of external load acting on the clamp (see slide 61).
However, only four of these components affect the required frictional resistance.
These are:
Torsion
Transverse shear (combined with torsion)
Longitudinal shear
Pull-off force
The above loads are used to calculate the bolt force required to prevent clamp
sliding. The pull-off force is included here since it causes a net reduction in
contact pressure, thus reducing the frictional resistance. The safety factor (SF)
to be used in these calculations is 1.5.
In addition to the above, axial tension in the clamped member will reduce the
member diameter thus reducing the radial contact pressure and the frictional
resistance. This effect shall be considered in the calculation of the bolt force
required to prevent clamp sliding.
66
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
This is a conservative formulation which does not account for the contribution of
frictional resistance from the bottom half of the clamp.
67
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
LONGITUDINAL SHEAR
68
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
F3= SF ⋅ P
69
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
70
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
71
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
LONGITUDINAL MOMENT
72
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
TRANSVERSE MOMENT
73
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
TRANSVERSE SHEAR
74
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Pull-Off
Fc = F5 + F6 + F7 + F8 + F9
75
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
76
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
77
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
It is recommended that all welds, except those fixing the side plates to the shell,
be full strength butt welds. (refer next slide)
78
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
79
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Clamp Strength
80
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
81
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
This should be less than the allowable bending moment across the width of each shell.
NOTE
In most cases the tubular will deform at relatively low bolt loads and the critical
bending moments on the shell will be due to the full bolt load and the contact pressure.
82
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
83
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
84
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
85
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
86
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
87
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
88
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
89
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
90
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
91
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
92
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
93
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
94
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
95
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
96
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
97
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
98
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
99
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
100
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN Example Calculations:
101
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
References :
102
RISER CLAMPS – ANALYSIS & DESIGN
103