The Economic Aspects of Public Debt,the incurring of debt is a symptom of bankruptcy (although theoretically speaking, the government cannot be bankrupt in a manner the private firm would), of irresponsible fiscal management, to others, it is somehow or other correlated with elections or electioneering, and with graft and corruption.
The Economic Aspects of Public Debt,the incurring of debt is a symptom of bankruptcy (although theoretically speaking, the government cannot be bankrupt in a manner the private firm would), of irresponsible fiscal management, to others, it is somehow or other correlated with elections or electioneering, and with graft and corruption.
The Economic Aspects of Public Debt,the incurring of debt is a symptom of bankruptcy (although theoretically speaking, the government cannot be bankrupt in a manner the private firm would), of irresponsible fiscal management, to others, it is somehow or other correlated with elections or electioneering, and with graft and corruption.
The Economic Aspects of Public Debt,the incurring of debt is a symptom of bankruptcy (although theoretically speaking, the government cannot be bankrupt in a manner the private firm would), of irresponsible fiscal management, to others, it is somehow or other correlated with elections or electioneering, and with graft and corruption.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22
SUBJECT: MEM 605 FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT IN EDUCATION
REPORTER: HAZEL V. CASALDON
TOPIC: ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF THE PUBLIC DEBT • To some, the incurring of debt is a symptom of bankruptcy (although theoretically speaking, the government cannot be bankrupt in a manner the private firm would), of irresponsible fiscal management, to others, it is somehow or other correlated with elections or electioneering, and with graft and corruption. • PUBLIC DEBT VS. PRIVATE DEBT • The public debt is the total amount of debt a central government or country owes. It is also known as national debt. The debtors can be the government, corporations or citizens of that country. The estimated Philippines public debt under the Aquino administration in 2016 was $ 972,678. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DEBT? Private debt • Private debt is the debt accumulated by individuals or private businesses. Private debt can take numerous forms; a personal loan, credit card, corporate bond or business loan for instance. • Private debt comes with numerous pitfalls and risks for the applicant. When a loan is provided by family or friends, missed repayments can cause tension and even result in the end of relationship. Debt incurred with a credit provider may result in high levels of interest, charges for missed payments or demands for security. Public Debt • Public debt, or national debt, is the sum of the financial obligations incurred by all government bodies of a country. This debt can be accumulated by the government directly or a government agency at any level. • Pubic debt can arise from a number of sources, for example government bonds create a debt owed by the government to a member of the public. Alternatively, Sovereign Debt is accumulated when the government of a country borrows money from the government of another. • The public technically owns the debt. However, the debt will be viewed by the rest of the world as linked to the country as whole. The choice to create public debt is ultimately not that of its owner, and is entered into by a few but paid for by many. IMPLICATIONS OF DEBT • When a person or a private business uses debt, it is placing a burden on itself to repay the funds, with interest, in the future. Taking on private debt requires borrowers to assess their income and expenses to determine whether they can easily repay the funds. Public debt, on the other hand, is incurred by a small number of people on behalf of the public at large. STRATEGIC DEBT • Both public and private debt can be used strategically. Individuals and businesses can use debt to build their credit reputations in anticipation of large purchases, such as real estate transactions, in the future. Companies also can use debt to fuel growth strategies designed to boost income and profit, which can more than make up for the extra interest expense. Governments can use debt to finance emergency response initiatives or to provide needed public services that raise citizens' quality of life and increase their access to reliable jobs. Using debt to financing job-related initiatives can have the same effect as debt-financed company growth plans: If more more people have a steady income, it will be easier to repay the debt and boost gross domestic product. THE BURDEN OF DEBT Burden- referred to “real burden”
A debt burden is a large amount of money
that one country or organization owes to another and which they find very difficult to repay. TRADITIONAL VIEWS ON THE BURDEN OF PUBLIC DEBT • The traditional view is that public debt as in the case of private debt imposes a real burden on the community. The classical view maintains that if the government expenditure is financed through taxation the present generation bears the burden. But if government expenditure is financed through public borrowing, the present generation gets relieved from the cost and burden is shifted to the future genera- tion. • The future generation suffers when present generation reduces its saving in- order to meet the debt finance and leave a smaller amount of capital resources for the future. This will reduce the productive capacity of the future generation and accordingly they will stand to lose. DIRECT MONEY BURDEN: • Repayment of public debt involves payment of interest and the principle by the government. Hence the government will have to raise the necessary resources by way of taxation. • The direct money burden of public debt consists of the tax burden imposed on the public and it is equal to the sum of money payments for interest and the principle components. In the case of an internal debt, there will be no direct money burden because all the money payments and receipts cancel out. DIRECT REAL BURDEN: • Real burden of public debt refers to the distribution of tax burden and public securities among the people. In a sense, it is the hardship sacrifice and loss of economic welfare shouldered by the taxpayers on account of increased taxation imposed for repayment of public debt. • It is a fact that people hold public debt and they also pay taxes towards the cost of debt service. If the proportion of taxation paid by the rich towards the cost of debt, service is smaller than the proportion of public securities held by them, whereas, if the proportion of taxation paid by the poor and middle-income group towards the cost of debt service is larger than the proportion of public securities held by them, there is a direct real burden from public debt. • Whereas suppose government bonds and securities are held by the working classes, while the taxation towards the cost of debt service is paid by the rich only, then public debt will help to reduce the inequalities of income in the community. In such a circumstances there is no direct burden; instead there is a direct real benefit to the community. REPRODUCTIVE AND DEADWEIGHT DEBT • Productive or Reproductive debt- Public debt is productive when it is used in income-earning enterprises. Or productive debt refers to that loan which is raised by the government for increasing the productive power of the economy. • A productive debt creates sufficient assets by which it is eventually repaid. If loans taken by the government are spent on the building of railways, development of mines and industries, irrigation works, education, etc., income of the government will increase ultimately. • Productive loans thus add to the total productive capacity of the country. • Deadweight debt- one where there is no existing corresponding assets • Public debt is unproductive when it is spent on purposes which do not yield any income to the government, e.g., refugee rehabilitation or famine relief work. Loans for financing war may be regarded as unproductive loans. • Unproductive loans do not add to the productive capacity of the economy. That is why unproductive debts are called deadweight debts DEBT CEILING
• The establishment of borrowing ceilings
by statute stems from the belief that a country cannot borrow an amount beyond its capacity to repay. At best these ceilings are mere approximations of the country's debt capacity LIMITS ON DEBT: Statutory limits A statute of limitations is the limited period of time creditors or debt collectors have to file a lawsuit to recover a debt. Most statutes of limitations fall in the three-to-six year range, although in some jurisdictions they may extend for longer depending on the type of debt. They may vary by: • State laws • What type of debt you have • Whether the state law applicable is named in your credit agreement Normal limit • is dictated by the needs of the economy itself. • varies in relation to the needs for fulfilling certain defined goals— stabilization, distribution, allocation. • It is a matter of functional finance DEBT RETIREMENT • The act of paying off a debt completely. If one borrows a certain amount, one must eventually repay it to the lender and retire the debt. Refinancing • Refinancing is the process of replacing an existing loan with a new loan. • The new loan pays off the current debt, so that debt is not eliminated when you refinance. However, the new loan should have better terms or features that improve your finances. • Refinancing program has been accomplished thru the cooperation of the Central Bank, PNB, DBP, Veterans Bank, SSS and GSIS. CONCLUSION: According to the South China Morning Post on May 12, “Philippine Secretary of Budget and Management Benjamin Diokno estimated some US$167 billion would be spent on infrastructure during Duterte’s six-year term, under the slogan ‘Build! Build! Build!’.” That could increase current Philippine national government debt of approximately $123 billion, to $290 billion. But that does not include interest. High rates of interest that China, the most likely lender, could impose on the new debt could balloon it to over a trillion U.S. dollars in 10 years. More likely according to my analysis, at 10% interest the new debt could go to $452 billion, bringing Philippines’ debt: GDP ratio to 197%, second-to-worst in the world. That understates the burden to the Philippines, as existing national government debt would also accrue interest over that time, and such interest was not included in the analysis. Dutertenomics, fueled by expensive loans from China, will put the Philippines into virtual debt bondage if allowed to proceed.