Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 17
Dependency Theory was initially developed
by Hans Singer and Raul Prebisch in the 1950s
and has been improved since then. Dependency is the condition in which the development of the nation-state of the South contributed to decline in their independence and to an increase in economic development of the countries of the North. (Cardoso and Felato, 1979). In addition, it argues that liberal trade causes greater impoverishment, not economic improvement, to less developed countries (Troye, 2003). In the 1500s, European explorers spread throughout the Americas, Africa and Asia claiming the lands of Europe. At one point, British Empire covered the about ¼ of the world. The United States which began as colonies soon sprawled out through the North America and took control of Haiti, Puerto Rico, Philippines, the Hawaiian Islands and parts of Panama and Cuba. Guns and factory-made goods were sent to Africa in exchange for slaves, who were sent to the colonies to produce goods like cotton and tobacco, which were then sent back to Europe. After the Second World War, there were many questions about international relations. One of those questions was: Because these countries are not pursuing the right economic policies or their governments are authoritarian and corrupt. Latin American scholars, however, are critical of that answer and are intrigued by their region’s underdevelopment. (Sanchez, 2014) Dependency Theory was a product of this experience. Trade protectionism through import substitution is the key to self-sustaining path to development, not liberal trade or export. In other words, rather than focusing on what poor countries are doing wrong, Dependency theory focuses on how poor countries have been wronged by richer nations. Inaddition, it argues that in a world of finite resources, we cannot understand why rich nations are rich without realizing that those riches came at the expense of another country being poor.
Inthis view, global stratification starts
with colonialism. The two main sub-theories of Dependency Theory according to (Sanchez, 2014) are:
1. North American Neo-Marxist
Approach
2. Latin American structuralist
Approach 1. NORTH AMERICAN NEO-MARXIST APPROACH
Andre Gunder Frank (1969) expoused the North
American Neo-Marxist approach. He contended the idea that less developed countries would develop by following the path taken by the developed countries. Developed countries were undeveloped in the beginning but not underdeveloped.
This means that the path taken by the developed
countries does not guarantee the same fate for the underdeveloped countries. Frank also rejected the idea that internal resources cause a country’s underdevelopment; rather, it is their dependency to capitalist system that causes lack of development. 2. LATIN AMERICAN STRUCTURALIST APPOACH
This was developed mainly by Latin American scientist
Palma (1978) noted that chief among the
arguments accounting for Latin American underdeveloped was the “excessive” reliance on exports of primary commodities. Core Nations Peripheral Nations
More Less developed
industrialized Receive an unequal nations who distribution receive the majority of the worlds wealth “Methodology for the analysis of concrete situations of Dependency” –(Cardoso & Faletto)
They believed that Latin American
economies were the result of capitalist expansion in the United States and Europe. “The idea of dependence refers to the conditions under which alone the economic and political system can exist and function in its connections with the world productive structure”
-Cardoso and Felatto (1979)
“The identification of interest networks- business, technocrafts, the military, the middle class that bind the dynamics of local political and economic processes to material and political interests in the industrialized world”