Curriculum Design and Organization
Curriculum Design and Organization
Curriculum Design and Organization
Process Design
SUBJECT-CENTERED DESIGN
Subject Design
-The oldest and best known school design to
both Teachers and laypeople.
Henry Morrison claimed that the subject matter
curriculum aimed most to literacy, and therefore
should be the focus of the elementary curriculum.
Robert Hutchins indicated which subjects
such a curriculum design would comprise a
school:language, mathematics, sciences, history,
and foreign languages.
Discipline Design
-this new design acquired popularity
during 1950s and reached its peak during the
mid 1960s. The basis of discipline design is with
content’s inherent organization.
Arthur King and John Brownell
-Specific knowledge that has the following
important characteristics: a community person,
an expression of human imagination, a domain,
a tradition, a mode of inquiry, a conceptual
structure, specialized language, a heritage of
literature, a network communication, a valuative
and affective stance, and an instructive
community.
The discipline knowledge emphasizes
science, mathematics, English, history, and other
disciplines.
In the subject matter design, students is
considered to have learned if they simply
acquire information; while in the discipline
design, students experience the disciplines so
that they can understand and theorize.
Broad-Field Design
-known to others as the Interdisciplinary design.
Designers of this discipline tried to give students a comprehensive
understanding of all content areas.
Sputnik era, and Broudy and his colleagues suggested that the entire
curriculum be organized into these categories:
1. Symbolic of information (English, foreign languages, and mathematics)
2. Basic sciences
3. Development studies(social and human culture)
4. Exemplars (Art, drama, music, and literature)
5. Moral Problems (social problems)
Correlation Design
Separates and total content integration,
was born the correlation design which attempts
to identify ways in which subjects can be linked
yet maintain their own identities
Progress Design
How to think
“ The good thinker, processing a spirit of
inquiry, a desire to pose questions vital to the
world. The good thinker consider the world, actual
and desired, inquiring things valued and desired.”
The design stresses those procedures that
allow students to analyze reality and construct
frameworks different from the way the world
appears to the causal viewer.
Learner-Centered Design
-progressive proponents have come called to
be learner-centered.
-These designs are realized more often at the
Elementary and Secondary. In Elementary schools,
teachers manage to highlight the whole child. While
in the secondary level, the stress is more on
subject-centered designs, ,mainly because of the
influence of textbook and the colleges and
universities at which the discipline is a foremost
planner for the curriculum
Child-Centered Design
-Proponents of this design believe that students
must be enthusiastic in their learning environments and
that learning should not be detached from students lives
which is mostly in the paradigm of the subject-centered
designs.
According to Arthur Ellis, he stated that “ attending
to students’ needs and interest requires careful
observation of students and faith that they can articulate
those needs and interests. Also, young students’ interest
must have educational value.”
Experience-Centered Design
-This design closely look like child-centered
design for which children’s concern are the
source for shaping children’s school world. But
it’s different from the child-centered design, is
that children’s needs and interest cannot be
planned for all children.
-In this design, the teacher’s role is to build
an inspiring learning environments in which
students can explore, come into direct contact ‘
with knowledge, and observe others learning
and action. The social activity for this design is
the child’s learning.
Romantic (Radical) Design
-The radicals reflect current society as
corrupt, suppressive, and powerless to remedy
itself.
Freire – education should inform the masses
about their oppression, provoke them to feel
dissatisfied with their condition, and give them
the skills necessary for correcting the identified
injustice.
Curricular Leaders who supports radical
views consider that individuals must learn ways
of involvement in an analysis of knowledge.
Learning is reflective, it is nor externally inflicted
by someone in power. Knowledge does not
reside in an unit plan or course syllable.
Humanistic Design
-This new psychological orientation
stressed that human action was more than a
reaction to stimulus, the meaning was more
important than methods, that emphasis of
consideration should be on the subjective rather
than objective nature of human existence, and
that there is an association between learning
and feeling.
Problem-Centered Designs
- Focuses on the individual and society’s real
life problems.