Gender Sensitivity
Gender Sensitivity
Gender Sensitivity
TRAINING FOR
COOPERATIVES
MAY 22, 2019
ST. WILLIAM’S MULTI-PURPOSE COOPERATIVE TRAINING HALL
BUTIGUE, PARACELIS, MOUNTAIN PROVINCE
SEX AND GENDER:
HOW DO THEY DIFFER?
SEX VS. GENDER
SEX GENDER
• Categorized as male or female • Masculinity and femininity
• Biological • Cultural
• Fixed at birth • Learned through socialization
• Does not change across time and • Varies over time and space
space • Unequally valued (masculinity as the
• Equally valued norm)
THUS,
Men Women
• Provides financially for the family • Takes care of the children and the
• Work as managers, construction house
builders, engineers • Works as nurse, teacher and secretary
• Portrayed as leaders • Portrayed as followers
2. GENDER STEREOTYPES IN CAPACITIES
Men Women
• Good in Math and Science • Good in arts and less intellectual
• Physically strong pursuits
• Firm decision-makers • Physically weaker and fragile
• Wishy-washy or fickle minded in
decision-making
3. GENDER STEREOTYPES IN TRAITS AND
CHARACTERISTICS
Men Women
• Active • Passive
• Aloof • Loving
• Aggressive • Peaceful
• Independent • Dependent
• Brave • Fearful
AREAS OF SOCIALIZATION
• Family
• Church
• Mass Media
• School
1. FAMILY
c.) Verbal Appellation – telling children what they are and what is expected of them.
Example:
Brave boy, pretty girl
Boys don’t cry, girls don’t hit playmates
1. FAMILY
The church sets rule on how a woman should act over man.
Example:
A wife must be submissive to his husband.
3. MASS MEDIA
• Chairman • Chairperson
• Salesman/sales girl • Salesperson/Sales staff
• Fireman • Fire fighter
• Housewife • Housemaker
• Waiter/Waitress • Wait staff
• Spokesman • Spokesperson
Sexist language is language that demeans or stereotypes men
or women, usually women.
Using non-sexist language is a matter of courtesy -- of respect
for and sensitivity to the feelings of others.
Avoid the use of he, him, his to refer to both men and women.
Use sparingly the double pronouns he/she and his/her.
35
REVISING SEXIST LANGUAGE
There are several ways to avoid sexist language that readers
increasingly find objectionable.
Some of these devices may not work in a particular context; but the
generic pronoun he can be replaced by using these methods.
FIRST: CUT THE PRONOUN.
INSTEAD OF:
The Chairperson should read the reports as they are submitted to
him by the committee members.
WRITE:
36
SECOND: REPEAT THE NOUN.
INSTEAD OF:
The judge in whose court the case is first filed has priority in hearing
the case. If venue appears to be improper, he should grant a motion to
transfer venue.
WRITE:
The judge in whose court the case is first filed has priority in hearing
the case. If venue appears to be improper, the judge should grant a
motion to transfer venue.
37
THIRD: MAKE THE ANTECEDENT PLURAL.
This tactic makes the generic singular he unnecessary.
INSTEAD OF:
A coop officer should conscientiously meet his responsibility to avoid
even the appearance of impropriety.
WRITE:
Coop officers should conscientiously meet their responsibility to avoid
even the appearance of impropriety.
38
FOURTH: USE AN ARTICLE INSTEAD OF A PRONOUN.
INSTEAD OF:
Every creditor may use legal means to enforce his credit.
WRITE:
Every creditor may use legal means to enforce a credit.
39
FIFTH: USE “ONE.”
INSTEAD OF:
A prevailing plaintiff in Baguio City is more likely to be awarded attorneys'
fees than he is in Makati City.
WRITE:
A prevailing plaintiff in Baguio City is more likely to be awarded attorneys'
fees than one in Makati City.
NOTE:
This method is not calculated to encourage writers to say, "One may begin
an appeal from an adverse judgment by filing one's notice of appeal and
then timely submitting one's brief."
Repeating one in that manner seems unnatural to most English writers.
40
MANIFESTATIONS OF GENDER
ISSUES IN
THE CO-OPERATIVE
41
WHY GENDER EQUALITY (GE)
IN CO-OPS?
42
WHY?.....
2. GE increases
productivity and
creates a
positive
environment.
43
WHY?.....
3. Integrating gender
equality benefits
the
co-operative and
creates powerful
and progressive
results.
44
SOME GENDER FACTS/ISSUES IN
CO-OPERATIVES IN THE
PHILIPPINES
1. Most members
of the Board of
Directors are
men.
45
2. Field work are
for men and
office work are
mostly for
women.
46
SOME…
6. Co-ops always
give preference
to males in the
hiring process.
50
7. Gender Equality
is only for
women—a
notion we have
when we are
invited to attend
GE seminars and
51
trainings.
8. Some employees
are good
performers but
not good
household
members.
52
9. Men have better
business
acumen and
women are
better
treasurers.
53
10. It is alright for
men to have
“coffee or beer
sessions” with
their buddies
and not alright
for women.
54
TARGETING RESULTS FROM GE
8. BE PROUD TO BE A GENDER
7. LEARN TO ACCEPT CRITICISM
ADVOCATE AND NEVER KEEP IT
– this is a pre-requisite to success
– let others know what you
and maturity.
believe and value most.
MY GE JOURNEY AS COOP MEMBER
AND GE ADVOCATE
M O N I T O R I N G & E V A L U A T I O N
ELEMENTS TO SUPPORT GENDER MAINSTREAMING
IN CO-OPS
Gender Equality and
Women Empowerment
Capacity development
Enabling Mechanisms
GAD M & E
Support from the CDA, NGAs, NGOs, LGUs, Civil Society, Academe, etc.
RECOMMENDATIONS/RESOLUTIONS
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES/PROJECTS (e.g.,
regular GAD national summit) – The co-
operative shall prove that gender programs and
projects in the Co-operative Development Plan
are implemented.
• Capacity-building of co-ops on
GAD
• Linkages/networking for GAD or
GAD-related
• Livelihood for women and men
RECOMMENDATIONS/RESOLUTIONS
81
INTRODUCTION
The State must ensure the safety and well-being of all women and girls
participating in sports by providing them comprehensive health and
medical insurance coverage, as well as integrated medical, nutritional,
and healthcare services.
Women in the military, police, and other similar services, must not be
restricted from availing combat training that are open to men or from
taking on functions other than administrative tasks.
Women in the military must have the same promotional privileges and
opportunities as men, including pay increases, additional remunerations
and benefits, and awards based on their competency and quality of
performance.
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY RELATIONS
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
In case of disagreement, the court shall decide whether:
• The objection is proper; and
• Benefit has occurred to the family prior to the objection or
thereafter.
If the benefit accrued prior to the objection, the resulting
obligation shall be enforced against the separate property of the
spouse who has not obtained consent.
QUESTION:
Suppose the husband unjustifiably refuses to allow his wife to exercise
her profession or engage in business, what are the rights of the wife?
ANSWER:
Republic Act 9262 (VAWC), under paragraph 4, Section 5, lists this
situation as an act of violence against a woman.
The provision penalizes the man (husband or live-in partner) if
he “prevents the woman from engaging in any legitimate profession,
occupation, business, or activity or controls the victim's own money or
properties, or solely controls the conjugal or common money, or
properties.”
PROPERTY REGIME OF UNIONS
WITHOUT MARRIAGE
ARTICLE 147,FAMILY CODE APPLIES TO
TWO KINDS OF RELATIONSHIPS
First, a man and a woman who are capacitated to marry
each other live exclusively as husband and wife without
the benefit of marriage.
Second, a man and a woman live together under a void
marriage where the parties do not have an existing
marriage with other persons.
ARTICLE 148 APPLIES TO FIVE
KINDS OF RELATIONSHIPS
• bigamous marriages.
• adulterous relationships.
• relationships in a state of concubinage.
• relationships where both man and
woman are married to other persons.
• multiple dalliances of the same man.
PCW MEMO CIRCULAR 2014-06
GENDER-SENSITIVE LANGUAGE
LIMITED RECOGNITION OF DIVORCE
• Divorce is not recognized in the Philippines.
• If you’re a Filipino, it doesn’t matter where you get a divorce.
The divorce is void in the Philippines.
• This is because under the nationality principle enunciated
under Article. 15, Civil Code, all Filipinos -- wherever they
may be in the world -- are bound by Philippine laws on family
rights and duties, status, condition, and legal capacity.
• Nevertheless, a divorce decree secured outside the
Philippines are recognized in certain instances. This is
provided in Article 26, par. 2 of the Family Code which reads:
ART. 26. All marriages solemnized outside the Philippines in
accordance with the laws in force in the country where they
were solemnized, and valid there as such, shall also be valid in
this country, except those prohibited under Articles 35(1), (4),
(5) and (6), 36, 37 and 38.
Where a marriage between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner is
validly celebrated and a divorce is thereafter validly obtained
abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him or her to remarry,
the Filipino spouse shall have capacity to remarry under
Philippine law.
The twin elements for the application of this provision are:
“Adultery is committed by any married woman who has sexual intercourse with a
man not her husband and by the man who has carnal knowledge of her knowing
her to be married, even if the marriage be subsequently declared void.”
CONCUBINAGE:
The Revised Penal Code defines and concubinage in Art. 334:
“Any husband who shall keep a mistress in the conjugal dwelling, or shall have
sexual intercourse under scandalous circumstances with a woman who is not his
wife, or shall cohabit with her in any other place, shall be punished...”
Based on its definition under the law, a husband commits
concubinage by:
ANSWER:
RA No. 9262 or the "Anti-Violence Against Women and their Children
Act of 2004” has now come to the rescue of women.
Philandering husbands can now be charged criminally even for just
one incident of marital infidelity under the “psychological violence”
provision of RA 9262.
PSYCHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE:
• same rights to choose freely a spouse and to enter into marriage only with their
free and full consent. The betrothal and the marriage of a child shall have no
legal effect.
• joint decision on the number and spacing of their children and access to the
information, education and means to enable them to exercise these rights.
EXAMPLE: The woman’s niece who lives with her is a child under her care.
QUESTION:
Who are liable under the law?
ANSWER:
Husbands, former husbands, present and former boyfriends or live-in
partners, or those with whom the woman has a common child, or anyone
with whom she has/had sexual or dating relationship.
Women can also be liable under “sexual or dating relationship.” These are
the lesbian partners or former partners of the victim.
EXAMPLE:
A woman who has a child by her rapist who harasses or abuses her is
protected by this law because they have a common child.
PUNISHABLE ACTS
ECONOMIC ABUSE
• marital infidelity.
• repeated verbal abuse.
• public humiliation.
• threatening the woman that she will lose her child.
• stalking or following the woman in her workplace, school, or any public or
private place without justification.
PHYSICAL ABUSE
• battery (physical injuries).
• frustrated parricide.
SEXUAL VIOLENCE
• causing or attempting to make the woman or her child to perform
sexual acts (that do not constitute rape) by use of force, threats,
intimidation directed against the woman, her child, or her immediate
family.
• prostituting the woman or her child.
REMEDIES OF THE VICTIM
The victim or her children can request for:
• Barangay Protection Order (BPO).
• Temporary Protection Order (TPO) and Permanent Protection
Order with the court.
• file a criminal action for violation of R.A. 9262.
A BPO is an order issued by the Punong Barangay or by a kawagad
ordering the offender to desist from committing or threatening
physical harm to the victim.
It is effective for 15 days and is not extendible.
HOW DOES THE VICTIM GET A BPO?
Without or without a BPO, she can apply for a Temporary Protection Order
(TPO) from the Family Court in her place of residence, or if there is no
Family Court, in Regional Trial Court, the Municipal Trial Court or Municipal
Circuit Trial Court or Metropolitan Trial Court.
TEMPORARY PROTECTION ORDER
In the case of People v. Canja, (86 Phil. 522 (1950), a man who had a
gambling, drinking and infidelity problem frequently beat up his wife.
One evening, while the man was asleep, his wife killed him, and confessed
the crime to her daughter. Her confession revealed that she was scared that
if she did not kill her husband, he might kill her.
The Court did not appreciate the defense of the wife, stating that the
cruelty of the husband is not a justification to take away his life.
However, in the separate opinion of Justice Marceliano Montemayor, he
wrote that the woman deserves executive clemency based on this
justification:
“The violence with which the appellant (wife) killed her husband reveals
the pent-up righteous anger and rebellion against years of abuse, insult,
and tyranny seldom heard of. Considering all these circumstances and
provocations, including the fact as already stated, that her conviction
was based on her own confession, I repeat that the appellant (wife) is
deserving of executive clemency, not of full pardon but of a substantial if
not a radical reduction or commutation of her life sentence.”21
This shows that as early as the 1950s, a Supreme Court Justice already
had an opinion on the unfairness of the law in the treatment of women
who commit crimes propelled by the pain of abusive domestic
relationships. However, in the next fifty years, there is merely a line of
Supreme Court cases wherein battered women are convicted of
parricide in the event they retaliated against their abusers.22
A breakthrough came in 2000 in Marivic Genosa, where the Supreme
Court acknowledged that it was necessary and indispensable for the court
to find out about the state of mind of the accused woman at the time of
the commission of the crime, and to ensure that a conviction is based on
guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The Court, speaking through Justice Artemio Panganiban, was open to the
fact that the “battered wife syndrome” is a viable plea under the
traditional concept of self-defense. Hence, the case was remanded to the
Regional Trial Court of Ormoc City for reception of the testimony of the
psychiatrist, the late Dr. Alfredo Pajarillo, as an expert witness.
REPUBLIC ACT 7877
SEXUAL HARASSMENT ACT OF 1995
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
• by penile insertion.
• by sexual assault.
• insertion of penis into the anus or mouth.
• insertion of objects into the vaginal or anal orifice.
• insertion of fingers or of the tongue into the vagina.
MARITAL RAPE
Husbands do not have property rights over their wives' bodies. Sexual
intercourse, albeit within the realm of marriage, if not consensual, is
rape.
This is the clear State policy expressly legislated in Section 266-A of the
Revised Penal Code (RPC), as amended by Republic Act (R.A.) No. 8353 or
the Anti-Rape Law of 1997.
• Husbands are reminded that marriage is not a license to forcibly rape
their wives. A husband does not own his wife's body by reason of
marriage. By marrying, she does not divest herself of the human right
to an exclusive autonomy over her own body and thus, she can
lawfully opt to give or withhold her consent to marital coitus.
• A husband aggrieved by his wife's unremitting refusal to engage in
sexual intercourse cannot resort to felonious force or coercion to make
her yield. He can seek succor before the Family Courts that can
determine whether her refusal constitutes psychological incapacity
justifying an annulment of the marriage.
The Court is aware that despite the noble intentions of the herein
pronouncement, menacing personalities may use this as a tool to harass
innocent husbands. In this regard, let it be stressed that safeguards in
the criminal justice system are in place to spot and scrutinize fabricated
or false marital rape complaints and any person who institutes untrue
and malicious charges will be made answerable under the pertinent
provisions of the RPC and/or other laws. (Peo. v. Jumawan, April
21, 2014)
PRESUMPTIONS ON SURVIVORSHIP
UNDER THE RULES OF COURT
When two persons perish in the same calamity, such as a
wreck, battle, or conflagration, and it is not shown who died
first, and there are no particular circumstances from which it
can be inferred, the survivorship is presumed from the
probabilities resulting from the strength and age of the sexes
of the parties. (Sec. 5 (jj), Rule 132, ROC)
• If both were under the age of 15 years, the older is deemed to have survived. (10 and
12)
• If both were above the age of 60 years, the younger is presumed to have survived. (62
and 65)
• If one be under 15 and the other above 60, the former is presumed to have survived. (
14 and 61)
• If both be over 15 and under 60, and the sexes be different, the male is
presumed to have survived; if the sexes be the same, then the older.
(male 25 and female 35/ same sex, older)
• If one be under 15 or over 60, and the other between these ages, the
latter is presumed to have survived. (13 or 61 and 20)